198 9Apjs. . .70. .731L the Astrophysical Journal Supplement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 70:731-812, 1989 August .731L © 1989. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. .70. 9ApJS. A CO SURVEY OF REGIONS AROUND 34 OPEN CLUSTERS 198 David Leisawitz Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; and Astronomy Program, University of Maryland Frank N. Bash Astronomy Department, The University of Texas at Austin AND Patrick Thaddeus HarvcU’d-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Received 1988 August 15; accepted 1988 December 12 ABSTRACT The Columbia 1.2 m millimeter-wave telescope was used to search systematically regions around 34 open star clusters for emission from the / = 1 —► 0 rotational transition of 12 CO. The survey sensitivity is sufficient to enable 3 a detection of lines as weak as 1 K (7^*) over a range in velocity ± 83 km s-1 centered on the stellar radial velocity. Around each cluster, a region at least 25 pc or 10 cluster angular diameters was mapped with a uniform sampling interval of 7(5; a typical region was ~ 4 deg2. The criteria used to select clusters for observation are outlined. The clusters have well-determined distances ranging from -1 to 5 kpc and ages < 100 Myr. Sample selection effects are discussed. A description is given of features of the interstellar matter associated with each of the surveyed clusters. Whenever possible, a distinction is made between interstellar matter that is physically associated with a cluster and material that lies along the line of sight but is otherwise not related to the cluster. In general, we find that (a) all the surveyed clusters younger than ~ 5 Myr have associated with them at least 4 one molecular cloud more massive than 10 M0\ (b) clusters older than ~ 10 Myr do not have associated with 3 them molecular clouds more massive than a few times 10 Af0; (c) molecular clouds are receding from young clusters at ~ 10 km s'1, and they also apparently are being destroyed by their interaction with the stars. Sites of ongoing star formation are found in a number of the clouds associated with young clusters. Subject headings: clusters: open — interstellar: molecules — nebulae: H n regions — stars: formation I. introduction Green, and Peters (1977; hereafter BGP) used CO spectral It is widely accepted that interstellar molecular clouds are line observations of regions around 63 young clusters to the birthplaces of stars, and, in recent years, a good deal of derive a characteristic molecular cloud lifetime. Spectroscopic discussion has centered on the question of whether and how and photometric observations of the stars in open clusters, molecular clouds are destroyed by star formation. Detailed interpreted with the aid of stellar evolution models, provide a studies of individual, isolated regions are inadequate if what chronometer with which the cluster ages can be gauged. one seeks is an understanding of the mechanism by which In principle, for example, if CO emission were to be de- stars interact with clouds in general. This is because the tected in regions around clusters younger than some age A, appearance of an individual region can be affected by initial but not in regions around clusters older than A, then one conditions, because the exact state of evolution of the system might conclude that the molecular cloud lifetime (after star under study is unknown, and because uncertainties exist in formation begins) is A. Indeed, the BGP survey indicated the positions and motions of the nascent stars relative to the that, on average, only clusters that contain stars of spectral clouds. type earlier than B0 show evidence for an associated molecu- Fortunately, there is a way to address the question of how lar cloud. Unfortunately, the BGP spatial resolution of ~ 2' stars interact with nearby interstellar matter (ISM) that cir- made severe undersampling of their regions necessary, and no cumvents or dilutes the impact of complications that arise in general conclusions regarding the nature of the cluster-cloud studies of individual regions. The method consists of examin- interaction could be drawn from their observations. ing, systematically, the interstellar contents of young open It was clear that several interesting questions could be cluster environments, considering clusters of a range of ages. addressed only with a CO survey more thorough than that of This approach was first employed by Gordon, Howard, and BGP. First, simply, what effect do stars have on the molecular Westerhout (1968; hereafter GHW) who used the 21 cm line clouds in which they form? Do the clouds survive their as a probe of the atomic gas in 28 cluster neighborhoods. interaction with the stars? What fraction of the molecular gas Schwartz (1971) sought radio continuum emission as an indi- is processed into stellar form? What physical mechanism cator of the presence of ionized gas around 41 clusters. Bash, dominates the interaction between a young cluster and the 731 © American Astronomical Society • Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System .731L 732 LEISAWITZ, BASH, AND THADDEUS Vol. 70 stellar matter to have been detected optically. A catalog of .70. molecular clouds in its vicinity, thus affecting the cloud life- . time and the arm-interarm contrast of molecular clouds in these clusters with an extensive bibliography has been pro- spiral galaxies? Also possibly influenced by the cluster-cloud vided by Alter, Ruprecht, and Vanysek (1970), supplemented interaction are the cloud-cloud velocity dispersion and the by Ruprecht, Balazs, and White (1981). A substantial fraction 9ApJS. stellar initial mass function (IMF). ( ~ 35%) of the cataloged clusters have been studied photo- 198 To learn more about the molecular gas content of young metrically, and for this fraction, distances, ages, and visual cluster environments, and spurred on by a major improve- extinctions are generally available. A smaller fraction, -10%, ment since BGP in millimeter receiver technology and by the have been observed spectroscopically and have measured ra- availability of a telescope designed specifically to survey large dial velocities (see, e.g., Hron 1987; Wramdemark 1982). The angular areas, we decided to map regions around a number of physical characteristics of 1180 open clusters are contained in young open clusters systematically for CO emission. the computer data base compiled by Lyngâ (1987), and some The present survey is one of several CO surveys of the statistical properties of the system of clusters are considered Milky Way conducted with the Columbia millimeter-wave by Lyngâ (1982) and Janes, Tilley, and Lyngâ (1988). telescope. Although CO surveys of the entire Galactic plane It was our aim to select from the set of known galactic have been made, with the Columbia telescope as well as with clusters, in a manner as free of bias as practicable, those others, these surveys were intended to show the large-scale which are the best suited for millimeter-wave observation. We molecular gas content of the Galaxy and, for a number of begin this section with a discussion of selection criteria and reasons, they do not provide the data that we seek. The inner then describe the characteristics of the sample and consider Galaxy either has been undersampled (Knapp, Stark, and the degree to which it is representative. Wilson 1985; Sanders et al 1986, and references therein), covered with a spatial resolving power too low to provide a) Cluster Sample Selection Criteria detailed information about distant star-forming complexes Four criteria were used to select a sample of clusters to (Dame et al. 1987, and references therein), or thoroughly survey in CO. A cluster must (a) be well-studied, (b) its mapped, but with limited Galactic latitude coverage (Cohen, distance must He in the range l<d (kpc) < 5, (c) its age must Dame, and Thaddeus 1986; Dame 1983). Confusion is an be <100 Myr, and (d) its declination must be > -20°. By additional major complication in the inner Galaxy. “well-studied,” we mean that agreement should exist among Because the molecular component of the outer Galaxy fills independent pubhshed estimates of the distance and age of a a relatively large part of the sky, coverage there has been cluster; additional weight is accorded to clusters with mea- either incomplete or obtained with low spatial resolution. In sured radial velocities. the low-angular-resolution survey of Dame et al. (1987), those Practical considerations led to the restriction on cluster of our clouds that are detected generally are not resolved. The distance. Since very few Galactic molecular clouds have a low-resolution survey, not surprisingly, turns out to be espe- dimension that exceeds 50 pc (see, e.g., Dame etal. 1986; cially sensitive to detections of local dark clouds that subtend Liszt, Xiang, and Burton 1981; Sanders, ScoviUe, and Solomon large solid angles and relatively massive clouds. 1985), it seemed reasonable to confine our observations gener- The Galactic plane surveys do show us the large picture of ally to within 25 pc of the cluster center in projected distance. the molecular Galaxy and thus provide a natural framework The sampling interval chosen for our CO observations was within which to evaluate the survey of open cluster neighbor- 7Í5, shghtly less than the beamwidth of the Columbia tele- hoods. Our survey is a link between the Galactic plane scope (see § III). A map of radius 25 pc at a distance of 1 kpc surveys and studies of individual star-forming complexes. The with this sampling would require 400 spectra or more, and open cluster survey coverage is compared to the coverage of one at a distance of 5 kpc would require about 20 spectra. To the Dame et al. (1987) survey in Figure 1. avoid biasing the sample by spending excessive time mapping Two major topics are treated in this paper: selection of a a few very nearby cluster regions, few clusters less than 1 kpc sample of clusters for observation and empirical results of a away were selected for observation.
Recommended publications
  • III. the Young Open Cluster NGC 1893 in the HII Region W8

    III. the Young Open Cluster NGC 1893 in the HII Region W8

    MNRAS 443, 454–473 (2014) doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1170 Sejong Open Cluster Survey (SOS) – III. The young open cluster NGC 1893 in the H II region W8 Beomdu Lim,1,2‹† Hwankyung Sung,2‹ Jinyoung S. Kim,3 Michael S. Bessell4 and Byeong-Gon Park1 1Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776 Daedeokdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-348, Korea 2Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-Ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-747, Korea 3Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave. Tucson, AZ 85721-0065, USA 4Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, MSO, Cotter Road, Weston, ACT 2611, Australia Downloaded from Accepted 2014 June 11. Received 2014 June 10; in original form 2014 March 31 ABSTRACT http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/ We present a UBVI and Hα photometric study of the young open cluster NGC 1893 in the H II region W8 (IC 410 or Sh 2-236). A total of 65 early-type members are selected from photometric diagrams. A mean reddening of the stars is E(B − V)=0.563 ± 0.083 mag. The published photometric data in the near- and mid-infrared passbands are used to test the reddening law towards the cluster, and we confirm that the reddening law is normal (RV = 3.1). Zero-age main-sequence fitting gives a distance modulus of V0 − MV = 12.7 ± 0.2 mag, equivalent to 3.5 ± 0.3 kpc. From Hα photometry, 125 Hα emission stars and candidates are identified as pre-main-sequence (PMS). The lists of young stellar objects and X-ray sources published by previous studies allow us to select a large number of PMS members down to at The Australian National University on September 16, 2014 1M.
  • Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae

    Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae

    Filter Performance Comparisons For Some Common Nebulae By Dave Knisely Light Pollution and various “nebula” filters have been around since the late 1970’s, and amateurs have been using them ever since to bring out detail (and even some objects) which were difficult to impossible to see before in modest apertures. When I started using them in the early 1980’s, specific information about which filter might work on a given object (or even whether certain filters were useful at all) was often hard to come by. Even those accounts that were available often had incomplete or inaccurate information. Getting some observational experience with the Lumicon line of filters helped, but there were still some unanswered questions. I wondered how the various filters would rank on- average against each other for a large number of objects, and whether there was a “best overall” filter. In particular, I also wondered if the much-maligned H-Beta filter was useful on more objects than the two or three targets most often mentioned in publications. In the summer of 1999, I decided to begin some more comprehensive observations to try and answer these questions and determine how to best use these filters overall. I formulated a basic survey covering a moderate number of emission and planetary nebulae to obtain some statistics on filter performance to try to address the following questions: 1. How do the various filter types compare as to what (on average) they show on a given nebula? 2. Is there one overall “best” nebula filter which will work on the largest number of objects? 3.
  • Winter Constellations

    Winter Constellations

    Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great ​ ​ hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar ​ ​ ​ nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. ​ ​ 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming ​ “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the ​ Orion Nebula.
  • Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer Observations of the Evolution of Massive Star-Forming Regions

    Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer Observations of the Evolution of Massive Star-Forming Regions

    The Astrophysical Journal, 744:130 (24pp), 2012 January 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/130 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. WIDE-FIELD INFRARED SURVEY EXPLORER OBSERVATIONS OF THE EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE STAR-FORMING REGIONS X. P. Koenig1,4,D.T.Leisawitz1, D. J. Benford1, L. M. Rebull2, D. L. Padgett1, and R. J. Assef3,4 1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 2 Spitzer Science Center (SSC), California Institute of Technology, M/S 220-6, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 169-530, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA Received 2011 July 8; accepted 2011 October 18; published 2011 December 22 ABSTRACT We present the results of a mid-infrared survey of 11 outer Galaxy massive star-forming regions and 3 open clusters with data from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). Using a newly developed photometric scheme to identify young stellar objects and exclude extragalactic contamination, we have studied the distribution of young stars within each region. These data tend to support the hypothesis that latter generations may be triggered by the interaction of winds and radiation from the first burst of massive star formation with the molecular cloud material leftover from that earlier generation of stars. We dub this process the “fireworks hypothesis” since star formation by this mechanism would proceed rapidly and resemble a burst of fireworks. We have also analyzed small cutout WISE images of the structures around the edges of these massive star-forming regions.
  • 2012 年發表 53 篇 1. Chang,Chan-Kao , Lai,Shao-Yu

    2012 年發表 53 篇 1. Chang,Chan-Kao , Lai,Shao-Yu

    2012 年發表 53 篇 1. Chang,Chan-Kao , Lai,Shao-Yu , Ko,Chung-Ming, et al. , Information on the Milky Way from the 2MASS All Sky Star Count: Bimodal Color Distributions ,The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 759, Issue 2, 94, 10 p..( 2012) 2. Chen,W.P. , Hu,S.C.-L. , Errmann,R., et al. , A Possible Detection of Occultation by a Proto-planetary Clump in GM Cephei ,The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 751, Issue 2, 118, 5 p..( 2012) 3. Hwang,Chorng-Yuan , Tsai,Mengchun, Star Formation in the Central Kiloparsec of Nearby Active Galaxies ,Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 372, Issue 1, id. 0120..( 2012) 4. Ip, W.-H., ENA diagnostics of auroral activity at Mars ,Planetary and Space Science, v. 63, pp. 83, (2012) 5. J.M. Nester and C.-H. Wang, Can torsion be treated as just another tensor field? ,International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, v. 7, pp. 158, (2012) 6. Lee, C.-H., Riffeser, A., Koppenhoefer, J., et al., PAndromeda?First Results from the High-cadence Monitoring of M31 with Pan-STARRS 1 ,The Astronomical Journal, Volume 143, Issue 4, article id. 89, 16 pp. (2012) 7. Lin, Z.-Y., Lara, L. M., Vincent, J. B., and Ip, W.-H., Physical studies of 81P/Wild 2 from the last two apparitions ,Astronomy and Astrophysics, v. 537, pp. A101, (2012) 8. Ngeow, C.-C., On the Application of Wesenheit Function in Deriving Distance to Galactic Cepheids ,The Astrophysical Journal, v. 747, pp. 50, (2012) 9. Ngeow, C.-C., Kanbur, S. M., Bellinger, E. P., et al., Period- luminosity relations for Cepheid variables: from mid-infrared to multi- phase, Astrophysics and Space Science, v.
  • Astronomy Magazine Special Issue

    Astronomy Magazine Special Issue

    γ ι ζ γ δ α κ β κ ε γ β ρ ε ζ υ α φ ψ ω χ α π χ φ γ ω ο ι δ κ α ξ υ λ τ μ β α σ θ ε β σ δ γ ψ λ ω σ η ν θ Aι must-have for all stargazers η δ μ NEW EDITION! ζ λ β ε η κ NGC 6664 NGC 6539 ε τ μ NGC 6712 α υ δ ζ M26 ν NGC 6649 ψ Struve 2325 ζ ξ ATLAS χ α NGC 6604 ξ ο ν ν SCUTUM M16 of the γ SERP β NGC 6605 γ V450 ξ η υ η NGC 6645 M17 φ θ M18 ζ ρ ρ1 π Barnard 92 ο χ σ M25 M24 STARS M23 ν β κ All-in-one introduction ALL NEW MAPS WITH: to the night sky 42,000 more stars (87,000 plotted down to magnitude 8.5) AND 150+ more deep-sky objects (more than 1,200 total) The Eagle Nebula (M16) combines a dark nebula and a star cluster. In 100+ this intense region of star formation, “pillars” form at the boundaries spectacular between hot and cold gas. You’ll find this object on Map 14, a celestial portion of which lies above. photos PLUS: How to observe star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies AS2-CV0610.indd 1 6/10/10 4:17 PM NEW EDITION! AtlAs Tour the night sky of the The staff of Astronomy magazine decided to This atlas presents produce its first star atlas in 2006.
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In

    A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In

    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
  • Astronomy 2008 Index

    Astronomy 2008 Index

    Astronomy Magazine Article Title Index 10 rising stars of astronomy, 8:60–8:63 1.5 million galaxies revealed, 3:41–3:43 185 million years before the dinosaurs’ demise, did an asteroid nearly end life on Earth?, 4:34–4:39 A Aligned aurorae, 8:27 All about the Veil Nebula, 6:56–6:61 Amateur astronomy’s greatest generation, 8:68–8:71 Amateurs see fireballs from U.S. satellite kill, 7:24 Another Earth, 6:13 Another super-Earth discovered, 9:21 Antares gang, The, 7:18 Antimatter traced, 5:23 Are big-planet systems uncommon?, 10:23 Are super-sized Earths the new frontier?, 11:26–11:31 Are these space rocks from Mercury?, 11:32–11:37 Are we done yet?, 4:14 Are we looking for life in the right places?, 7:28–7:33 Ask the aliens, 3:12 Asteroid sleuths find the dino killer, 1:20 Astro-humiliation, 10:14 Astroimaging over ancient Greece, 12:64–12:69 Astronaut rescue rocket revs up, 11:22 Astronomers spy a giant particle accelerator in the sky, 5:21 Astronomers unearth a star’s death secrets, 10:18 Astronomers witness alien star flip-out, 6:27 Astronomy magazine’s first 35 years, 8:supplement Astronomy’s guide to Go-to telescopes, 10:supplement Auroral storm trigger confirmed, 11:18 B Backstage at Astronomy, 8:76–8:82 Basking in the Sun, 5:16 Biggest planet’s 5 deepest mysteries, The, 1:38–1:43 Binary pulsar test affirms relativity, 10:21 Binocular Telescope snaps first image, 6:21 Black hole sets a record, 2:20 Black holes wind up galaxy arms, 9:19 Brightest starburst galaxy discovered, 12:23 C Calling all space probes, 10:64–10:65 Calling on Cassiopeia, 11:76 Canada to launch new asteroid hunter, 11:19 Canada’s handy robot, 1:24 Cannibal next door, The, 3:38 Capture images of our local star, 4:66–4:67 Cassini confirms Titan lakes, 12:27 Cassini scopes Saturn’s two-toned moon, 1:25 Cassini “tastes” Enceladus’ plumes, 7:26 Cepheus’ fall delights, 10:85 Choose the dome that’s right for you, 5:70–5:71 Clearing the air about seeing vs.
  • Interstellar Extinction in the Direction of Young Open Star Clusters

    Interstellar Extinction in the Direction of Young Open Star Clusters

    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 IARJSET International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 6, Issue 5, May 2019 Interstellar Extinction in the Direction of Young Open Star Clusters Alok K. Durgapal* Center of Advanced Study, Department of Physics, D. S. B. Campus, Kumaun University Nainital, India Abstract: The total to selective extinction law in optical and near-IR wavelengths for twenty young open star clusters namely Berkeley 7, Collinder 69, Hogg 10, NGC 2362, Czernik 43, NGC 6530, NGC 6871, Bochum 10, Haffner 18, IC 4996, NGC 2384, NGC 6193, NGC 6618, NGC 7160, Collinder 232, Haffner 19, NGC 2401, NGC 6231, NGC 6823, NGC 7380 have been studied. It is found that fifteen clusters follow normal extinction law and five clusters show an anomalous behavior. Keywords: Star cluster: Reddening, interstellar dust- Interstellar extinction I. INTRODUCTION The interstellar dust which is remnant of star formation process can transmit and redirect the light of stars ([2]). As a result it becomes very difficult to determine accurate distances and magnitudes of astronomical objects ([11]); to overcome this difficulty we must have knowledge of composition of interstellar dust in every line of sight. The interstellar extinction is caused either by general interstellar medium (ISM) or by localized region of higher mean density ([9], [15]). Study of interstellar extinction provides information about components of the molecular cloud from which a star was formed. Young stars contain dust around them so young open star clusters are the ideal objects for extinction study ([5], [8], [10], [16], [17]). First started with Trumpler in 1920 and then many investigators studied extinction in the Galaxy.
  • 2014 Observers Challenge List

    2014 Observers Challenge List

    2014 TMSP Observer's Challenge Atlas page #s # Object Object Type Common Name RA, DEC Const Mag Mag.2 Size Sep. U2000 PSA 18h31m25s 1 IC 1287 Bright Nebula Scutum 20'.0 295 67 -10°47'45" 18h31m25s SAO 161569 Double Star 5.77 9.31 12.3” -10°47'45" Near center of IC 1287 18h33m28s NGC 6649 Open Cluster 8.9m Integrated 5' -10°24'10" Can be seen in 3/4d FOV with above. Brightest star is 13.2m. Approx 50 stars visible in Binos 18h28m 2 NGC 6633 Open Cluster Ophiuchus 4.6m integrated 27' 205 65 Visible in Binos and is about the size of a full Moon, brightest star is 7.6m +06°34' 17h46m18s 2x diameter of a full Moon. Try to view this cluster with your naked eye, binos, and a small scope. 3 IC 4665 Open Cluster Ophiuchus 4.2m Integrated 60' 203 65 +05º 43' Also check out “Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum to the east (IC 4756 and NGC 6633) A loose open cluster with a faint concentration of stars in a rich field, contains about 15-20 stars. 19h53m27s Brightest star is 9.8m, 5 stars 9-11m, remainder about 12-13m. This is a challenge obJect to 4 Harvard 20 Open Cluster Sagitta 7.7m integrated 6' 162 64 +18°19'12" improve your observation skills. Can you locate the miniature coathanger close by at 19h 37m 27s +19d? Constellation star Corona 5 Corona Borealis 55 Trace the 7 stars making up this constellation, observe and list the colors of each star asterism Borealis 15H 32' 55” Theta Corona Borealis Double Star 4.2m 6.6m .97” 55 Theta requires about 200x +31° 21' 32” The direction our Sun travels in our galaxy.
  • Cassiopeia - the Queen

    Cassiopeia - the Queen

    May 18 2021 Cassiopeia - The Queen Observed: No Object Her Type Mag Alias/Notes NGC 7801 Non-Existent IC 11 Non-Existent NGC 358 Non-Existent NGC 629 Non-Existent IC 155 Non-Existent NGC 771 Non-Existent IC 1795 Non-Existent NGC 896 IC 1824 Non-Existent Single Star IC 1831 Non-Existent IC 1851 Non-Existent NGC 7438 Non-Existent IC 5366 Non-Existent NGC 7795 Non-Existent Sub Total: 13 Observed: Yes Object Her Type Mag Alias/Notes ABELL 82 Pl Neb 12.7 IC 1454 BERK 2 Open Cl I 1 m BERK 58 Open Cl IV 2 p 9.7 CR 15 Open Cl II 2 p 8.1 Tr 1 CR 26 Open Cl II 3 m n 6.5 Mel 15 Inside IC 1805 LBN CR 34 Open Cl I 3 p 6.8 CR 36 Open Cl III 2 m 7 Tr 3 CR 463 Open Cl III 2 m 5.7 IC 10 Glxy IBm 11.8 UGC 192 MCG 10-1-1 IRAS 177+5900 PGC 1305 IC 59 Brt Nebula E+R Sh2-185 Gamma Cassiopiae LBN 620 IC 63 Brt Nebula E+R LBN 623 Ghost Nebula IC 166 Open Cl II 1 r 11.7 IC 289 Pl Neb 4+2 12.3 Hubble 1 PK 138+2.1 PNG 138.8+2.8 IC 1590 Open Cl n 7.4 Cr 8 (Inside of NGC 281) IC 1747 Pl Neb 3b 13.6 PK 130+1.1 PNG 130.2+1.3 IC 1805 Brt Nebula E Sh2-190 LBN 654 (Cr 26 in brightest part) Heart Nebula IC 1848 Open Cl I 3 p n 6.5 Cr 32 (Inside LBN 667 Soul Nebula) IC 1871 Brt Nebula E KING 13 Open Cl II 2 m KING 14 Open Cl III 1 p 8.5 KING 16 Open Cl I 2 m 10.3 LBN 667 Brt Nebula E Soul Nebula (Surrounds IC1848) NGC 103 Open Cl II 1 m 9.8 NGC 110 Open Cl IV 1 p NGC 129 H79-8 Open Cl III 2 m 6.5 Cr 2 NGC 133 Open Cl IV 1 p 9.4 NGC 136 H35-6 Open Cl II 1 p Cr 4 Page 1 of 2 May 18 2021 Cassiopeia - The Queen Observed: Yes Object Her Type Mag Alias/Notes NGC 146 Open Cl II
  • Sejong Open Cluster Survey (SOS)-IV. the Young Open Clusters

    Sejong Open Cluster Survey (SOS)-IV. the Young Open Clusters

    Sejong Open Cluster Survey (SOS) - IV. The Young Open Clusters NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 Beomdu Lim1,5, Hwankyung Sung2, Michael S. Bessell3, Jinyoung S. Kim4, Hyeonoh Hur2, and Byeong-Gon Park1 [email protected] Received ; accepted Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45. 1Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776 Daedeokdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-348, Korea 2Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, arXiv:1502.00105v1 [astro-ph.SR] 31 Jan 2015 Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-747, Korea 3Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, MSO, Cotter Road, Weston, ACT 2611, Australia 4Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave. Tucson, AZ 85721-0065, USA 5Corresponding author, Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science & Technology Research Fellow –2– ABSTRACT Young open clusters located in the outer Galaxy provide us with an oppor- tunity to study star formation activity in a different environment from the solar neighborhood. We present a UBVI and Hα photometric study of the young open clusters NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 that are situated toward the Galactic anticenter. Various photometric diagrams are used to select the members of the clusters and to determine the fundamental parameters. NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 are, on average, reddened by hE(B − V )i = 0.92 ± 0.05 and 0.74 ± 0.17 mag, respectively. The properties of the reddening toward NGC 1931 indicate an abnormal reddening law (RV,cl = 5.2 ± 0.3). Using the zero-age main se- quence fitting method we confirm that NGC 1624 is 6.0 ± 0.6 kpc away from the Sun, whereas NGC 1931 is at a distance of 2.3 ± 0.2 kpc.