-1-

STOVEBIBLIOGRAPHY (Compiled by James Franklin)

BOOKS

1. Probability and Hume'sInductive Scepticism (Oxford: Clarendon, 1973). (www.geoci- ties.com/ResearchTriangle/Facility/4118/dcs/hume/hume.html)

[reviews by I. Hinckfuss, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 52 (1974): 269-76, and by S. Blackburn, Times Liter- ary Supplement n. 3727 (10 Aug 1973): 935 (with correspondence Sept 28 and Oct 12, 1973); comment by J.E. Adler,`Stove onHume'sinductive scepticism', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 53 (1975): 167-170; Stove's replies to these three in `Hume, induction and the Irish', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 54 (1976): 140-147; further comment in S. Waterlow, `On a proposed refutation of Hume', Analysis 36 (1975): 43-46; P.J. Mc- Grath, `Hume'sinductive scepticism', Philosophical Studies (Ireland): 24 (1976): 64-81; J. Cassidy,`The na- ture of Hume'sinductive scepticism', Ratio 19 (1977): 47-54; W.K. Goosens, `Stove and inductive scepti- cism', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 57 (1979): 79-84; G. Gawlick, `Zwischen Empirismus und Skeptizis- mus', Philosophische Rundschau 26 (1979): 161-86); K. Gemes, `Arefutation of inductive scepticism', Aus- tralasian J.ofPhilosophy 61 (1983): 434-8 (repr.inTweyman, : Critical Assessments vol. 11, pp. 44-48); W.E. Morris, `Hume'srefutation of inductive probabilism', in J.H. Fetzer,ed, Probability and Causal- ity (Dordrecht, 1988), pp. 43-77; R. Lantin, `Hume and the ', Philosophia 26 (1-2) (1998): 105-17; B.K. Hinton, `Is Hume'sinductive skepticism based upon rationalistic assumptions?', Modern Schoolman 77 (2000): 309-32; further reviews in Tijdschrift voor Filoso®e 35 (1973): 646; Philosophical Books 15 (1974): 24; Philosophia 4(1974): 375; Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1974): 72; Philosophical Re- view 84 (1975): 453; British J.for the 26 (1975): 85; J. ofthe History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 413; Hume Studies 1(1975): 25; Mind 85 (1976): 297; Canadian J.ofPhilosophy 7(1977): 203; Cri- tique 39 (1983): 960]

2. Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists (Oxford: Pergamon, 1982). (www.geoci- ties.com/ResearchTriangle/Facility/4118/dcs/popper/popper.html)

[criticism in R. Sylvan, `Science and science: relocating Stove and the modern irrationalist', Research Series in Unfashionable Philosophy 1(1984): 35-54; J. Watkins, `On Stove's book, by a ®fth "irrationalist"', Aus- tralasian J.ofPhilosophy 63 (1985): 259-68; S. Yates, `Stove's critique of "irrationalists"', Metaphilosophy 18 (1987): 149-160; K. Jodkowski, `Wspolnoty uczonych, paradygmaty i rewolucje naukowe', Realizm, Racjon- alnosc, Relatywizm vol. 22 (MCS Publishing House, Lublin, 1990), pp. 439-52; K. Jodkowski, `Zde- maskow anie bandy czterech (irracjonalistow), in K. Jodkowski, ed, `Na czym polega racjonalnosc nauki', Re- alizm, Racjonalnosc, Relatywizm vol. 7 (MCS Publishing House, Lublin, 1991), with Polish translations of Sylvan and Watkins articles above and of S. Yates, `Stove o neutralizowaniu slowwskazujacych na sukces'; S.C. Hetherington, `Stove's new irrationalism', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1998): 244-9; summa- ry in J. Srzednicki & D. Wood, eds, Essays on Philosophy in Australia (Dordrecht, 1992), pp. 242-5, 282-4; comment in Z.A. Sokuler,`Several trends and problems in contemporary Western philosophical science', Vo- -2-

prosy Filoso®i 1983 (11): 123-33; J.R. Kantor,`Scienti®c unity and spiritistic disunity', Psychological Record 34 (1984): 69-71; T.Theocharis & M. Psimopolous, `Where science has gone wrong', Nature 329 (1987): 595-8; A.J.M. Garrett, `Probability,philosophyand science', in J. Skilling, ed, Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods (Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 107-16; The Skeptic 12 (4) (1992): 51 & 13 (2) (1993): 47; K. Windschuttle, The Killing of History (Sydney, 1994), ch. 7; D. Miller, Critical Rationalism (Chicago, 1994), pp. 52-4; reviews in Times Literary Supplement no. 4187 (1 July 1983): 693; Critique 39 (1983): 960; Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'eÂtranger 108 (1983): 369; Philosophy of Science 50 (1983): 350; Quadrant 27 (6) (June 1983): 80; Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 62 (1984): 99; NewScientist 19/1/84, p. 36; Philosophi- cal Books 25 (1984): 250; British J.for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1984): 307; NewIdeas in Psychology 2 (1984): 81; Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (1985): 368; Dialogue (Canada) 24 (1985): 177; British J.of Sociology of Education 6(1985): 243; Studia Philosophica (Switzerland) 44 (1985): 237; Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 23 (1) (1987): 119; Philosophical Studies (Ireland): 31 (1986/7): 356; Philosophy and Litera- ture 12 (1988): 155]

3. The Rationality of Induction (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986).

[comment in B. Gower,`Stove oninductive scepticism', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 68 (1990): 109-112; B. Indurkhya, `Some remarks on the rationality of induction', Synthese 85 (1990): 95-114; M. Rowan, `Stove on the rationality of induction and the uniformity thesis', British J.for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1993): 561-6; P.Maher,`The hole in the ground of induction', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 74 (1996): 423-32; S. Campbell, `The fallacyofinductive skepticism', The Skeptic Autumn 2001: 25-30; reviews in Philosophy of Science 54 (1987): 612; Philosophical Books 28 (1987): 189; Canadian Philosophical Reviews 7(1987): 464; History and Philosophy of Logic 8(1987): 116; Times Literary Supplement no. 4367 (19 Dec 1986): 1429; Philosophy 63 (1988): 286; Dialogue (Canada) 27 (1988): 178; Modern Schoolman 65 (1988): 292; Reviewof 42 (1988): 411; Nous 23 (1989): 396; Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 67 (1989): 447; Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'eÂtranger 115 (1990): 716; International Studies in Philosophy 22 (1990): 137; Aquinas 33 (1990); 453]

4. The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical Follies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).

[translated by Eugenia MartiÂn, El Culto de PlatoÂn y Otras Locaras Filoso®cas (Madrid: Ediciones Catedra SA, 1993); reviews in Times Literary Supplement 22 Feb 1991; Philosophical Investigations 14 (1991): 351; News Weekly 8June 1991; Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 70 (1992): 123; Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'eÂtranger 117 (1992): 572; Philosophical Books 33 (1992): 25; Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1993): 264; Dialogue (Canada) 32 (1993): 402; Canadian Philosophical Reviews 14 (1994): 59-63, comment in A. Mus- grave,`Conceptual and Stove's Gem', in M.L. Dalla Chiara, ed, Philosophy of Science in Florence (Dordrecht, 1999), repr.inA.Musgrave, Essays on Realism and Rationalism (Amsterdam, 1999), pp. 177-84, and as `Idealism and antirealism', in R. Klee, ed, Scienti®c Inquiry: Readings in the Philosophy of Science (N.Y., 1999), pp. 344-52; M. Huben, `Skepticism of philosophical thought', 1998, www.suite101.com/arti- cles.cfm/skepticism/13673] -3-

5. Cricketversus Republicanism, ed. J. Franklin & R.J. Stove (Sydney: Quakers Hill Press, 1995). [Comment in SydneyMorning Herald 6/1/95 p. 10, 7/1/95 p.18; Courier Mail 1/3/95 p. 8; Media Watch 32 (1995): 20; Philosophy 70 (1995), p. 300; Heraclitus 40 (Mar.1995): 14; Australian Ra- tionalist no. 38 (1995): 38; reviews in Adelaide Review no. 135 (Jan. 1995): 27; Australian 3/5/95: 12; Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 73 (1995): 511; Policy (Autumn, 1995); The Horatian,Summer 1994-5: 41-5; Salisbury Review (Dec, 1995): 41-2.]

6. Darwinian Fairytales (Avebury Press, Aldershot, 1995). [Comment in S. Blackburn, `I rather think I am a Darwinian', Philosophy 71 (1996): 605-16; J. Franklin, `Stove's anti-Darwinism', Philosophy 72 (1997): 133-6; Reviews in Perspective (Dec, 1996): 13-5; Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 75 (1997): 133-5, repr.in Rationalist News 31 (2) (Apr 1997): 8-9; History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 20 (1998): 108-10; Network (Scienti®c and Medical Network), no. 68 (Dec, 1998): 45-8 (www.cis.plym.ac.uk/SciMedNet/library/re- viewsN66+/N68DarwinianFairyTales.htm).]

7. Anything Goes (Macleay Press, Sydney, 1998; repr.as Scienti®c Irrationalism: Origins of aPostmodern Cult Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, 2000). (reprint of Popper and Af- ter,with introduction by K. Windschuttle (www.newcriterion.com/constant/stove1.htm) and Afterword by J. Franklin) [Discussion in A. Olding, `Popper for afters', Quadrant 43 (12) (Dec, 1999): 19-22; reviews in Australian Book Review (June, 1999); The Skeptic 19 (3) (Spring, 1999): 38; Sceptic (U.K.) 12 (3-4) (1999): 45; Washington Times 27/2/00; Comment in SydneyMorning Herald 19/12/98]

8. Against the Idols of the Age: A David Stove Reader: Essays Selected with an introduction by RogerKimball (Transaction, NewBrunswick, 1999) [Reviews in National Post of Canada 28/12/99 (www.isteve.com/Philosophy.htm); Spectator 30/1/00; Washington Times 27/2/00; www.theoccasional.com/Books/B-Goldman2/b-gold- man2.html; The Mises Review 6(2) (Summer,2000): 20-4; Partisan Review 67 (3) (Summer 2000): 500-3 (www.bu.edu/partisanreview/archive/2000/3/campbell.html); Virginia Quarterly Review 76 (3) (Summer,2000): 103; Australian'sReviewofBooks Nov, 2000, 12-13; Philosophy and Litera- ture 24 (2000): 497-9; Quadrant 45 (1-2) (Jan-Feb, 2001): 114-6; comment in Australian Financial Review 6/10/00, p. 82 ]

ARTICLES 1. `Goths within the gates', Honi Soit (SydneyUniversity) 21 (5) (7 Apr 1949): 5 & 8. [on `certain vicious aspects of the policyofthe Public Library of NSW'] -4-

2. `Liberals, democracyand the anti-Communist bill', Honi Soit (4 May 1950). p. 5; [comment in P.Coleman, `Nothing but the bill', Honi Soit (18 May 1950), pp. 4-5.]

3. `The conditions of knowing', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 30 (1952): 47-61. 4. `Anote on "relativism"', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 30 (1952): 188-191. 5. `Two problems about individuality', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 33 (1955): 183-188. [comment in J. Bobik, `Anote on a problem about individuality', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 36 (1958): 210-215]

6. `Are professors overpaid?', The Observer (Sydney) 19 Apr 1958: 133-134. 7. `Popperian con®rmation and the paradox of the ravens', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 37 (1959): 149-151. [critcism in J.W.N. Watkins, `Mr Stove's blunders', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 37 (1959): 240-1]

8. `Areply to Mr Watkins', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 38 (1960): 51-54. [with J.W.N. Watkins, `Reply to Mr Stove's reply', 38 (1960): 54-58; W.J. Huggett, `Discussion, on not being gulled by ravens', 38 (1960): 48-50; P.C. Gibbons, `On the severity of tests', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 40 (1962): 79-82]

9. Critical notice of K. Popper, The Logic of Scienti®c Discovery,Australasian J.ofPhiloso- phy 38 (1960): 173-187. [comment in J. Agassi, `The role of corroboration in Popper'smethodology', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 39 (1961): 82-91]

10. `Two cultures? or goodbye to all that', The Australian Highway (Workers' Educational Association of NSW) 41 (3) (June, 1960): 57-60. [comments in `Heat overStove', 41 (4) (Sept, 1960): 90-3]

11. `John Anderson and cultural freedom in Australia', The FreeSpirit (Australian Associa- tion for Cultural Freedom) 8 (1) (May/June 1962): 6-7. 12. `Velikovskyincollision', Quadrant 8(4) (Oct/Nov1964): 35-44; repr.in Kronos 6:3. 13. `Hume, probability,and induction', Philosophical Review 74 (1965): 160-177, repr in V.C. Chappell, ed, Hume: A Collection of Critical Essays (Garden City,N.Y., 1966, London, 1968), pp. 187-212, in Philosophy Today no. 3, ed. J.H. Gill (N.Y., 1970), and in S. Twey- man, ed, David Hume: Critical Assessments (London, 1995), vol. II, pp. 29-43. [criticism in D. Goldstick, `Hume's"circularity" charge against inductive reasoning', Dialogue (Canada) 11 (1972): 258-266]

14. `Hempel and Goodman on the ravens', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 43 (1965): 300-310. -5-

15. `Hempel'sparadox', Dialogue 4(1966): 444-455. 16. `On logical de®nitions of con®rmation', British J.for the Philosophy of Science 16 (1966): 265-272. 17. University Letter: `The Humphreys Affair', Quadrant 11 (3) (May/June 1967): 54-56. 18. Article `Keynes, John Maynard', in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. P.Edwards (N.Y., 1967) vol 4 pp. 333-4. 19. (with C.A. Hooker) `Relevance and the ravens', British J.for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1968): 305-315. [further in C.A. Hooker,`The ravens, Hempel and Goodman', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 49 (1971): 82-89; J.L. Mackie, `The relevance criterion of con®rmation', British J.for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1969): 27-40; criticism in L. Gibson, `Ravens and relevance and a likelihood solution of the paradox of con- ®rmation', British J.for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1969): 75-80 ]

20. `The scienti®c ma®a', Science Yearbook (SydneyUniversity Science Association) 1969: 96-101. [Original version in Honi Soit 7/9/1967 repr.in`The Velikovskystory: the scienti®c ma®a', Pensee 2(2) (May,1972) and at http://www.kronia.com/journals/scima®a.txt]

21. `Deductivism', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 48 (1970): 76-98. [criticism in F.N. Harpley, `Hume'sprobabilism', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 49 (1971): 146-151; J. Hearne, `Deductivism and practical reasoning', Philosophical Studies 45 (1984): 205-8]

22. `University notes: Sydney', Quadrant 14 (2): (Mar/Apr 1970): 37-39. 23. `Mr Gibson on ravens and relevance', British J.for the Philosophy of Science 21 (1970): 287-288. 24. `Santamaria and the philosophers', Honi Soit 43 (32) (29/10/70): 11. 25. `Misconditionalisation', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 50 (1972): 173-183. 26. `An error in Selby-Bigge's Hume', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 51 (1973): 77. 27. `Laws and singular propositions', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 51 (1973): 139-143. 28. `Hume, the causal principle and Kemp Smith', Hume Studies 1(1975): 1-24. [criticism in F.E. Sparshott, `In defense of Kemp-Smith', Hume Studies 1(1975): 66-9; E. Craig, `Hume'slet- ter to Stewart', Hume Studies 1(1975): 70-5; H.B. Dalrymple, `Hume'scausal principle', Southwest Philo- sophical Studies 1(1976): 46-9; R.J. Glossop, `In defence of David Hume', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 55 (1977): 59-63]

29. `Dr Johnson, British moralist', Quadrant 19 (4) (July,1975): 83-86, repr.in. Quadrant Twenty-Five Years, ed. P.Coleman, L. Shrubb & V.Smith (St Lucia, 1982), pp. 380-7. -6-

30. `Hume, induction and the Irish', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 54 (1976): 140-147. [replies to critics of Probability and Hume'sInductive Scepticism;comments in I. Hinckfuss, `Stove,induc- tion and the Irish', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 55 (1977): 64-8; M.C. Bradley, `Stove onHume', 55 (1977): 69-73, C. Mortensen, `Koopman, Stove and Hume', 55 (1977): 74-5]

31. `Whyshould probability be the guide of life?', in D.W.Livingston & D.T.King, Hume: A Re-Evaluation (N.Y., 1976), pp. 50-68, reprinted in R. McLaughlin, ed, What?, Where?, When?, Why? (Dordrecht/Boston, 1982), pp. 27-48. 32. `David Hume: 1776-1976', Quadrant 20 (11) (Nov, 1976): 52-54. 33. `Hume, Kemp Smith and Carnap', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 53 (1977): 189-200. 34. `The force of intellect: ®fty years of John Anderson', Quadrant 21 (7) (July 1977): 45-46. 35. `Popper on scienti®c statements', Philosophy 53 (1978): 81-88. [Discussion in M. Rowanand A. Smithson, `Stove onPopper'sscienti®c statements', Philosophy 55 (1980): 258-62]

36. `On Hume'sis-ought thesis', Hume Studies 4(1978): 64-72. 37. `Part IX of Hume's Dialogues', Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 300-309, repr.in Tweyman, David Hume: Critical Assessments vol. V,pp. 254-64. [comment Ð favourable, for once Ð by J. Franklin in Philosophical Quarterly 30 (1980): 69-71 (repr.in Tweyman, vol. V,pp. 254-64); criticism by D.E. Stahl, `Hume's Dialogues IX defended', Philosophical Quar- terly 34 (1984): 505-7; J.K. Campbell, `Hume'srefutation of the cosmological argument, International Jour- nal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (1996): 159-73.]

38. `The problem of induction', Proceedings of the Russellian Society 3(1978): 11-23. 39. `The nature of Hume'sskepticism', in D. Norton, D. Capaldi & W.L. Robison, eds, McGill Hume Studies (San Diego, 1979), pp. 203-225, repr.inTweyman, David Hume: Critical Assessments vol. II, pp. 274-94. 40. `The plurality of worlds: a dialogue', Quadrant 23 (1/2) (Jan/Feb, 1979): 37-41. [originally and in full in Proceedings of the Russellian Society,3(1978): 37-64]

41. `HowPopper'sphilosophybeg an', Philosophy 57 (1982): 381-387. [criticism in J.M. Brown, `Popper had a brand newbag', Philosophy 59 (1984): 512-5]

42. `Aquestion of origins', Quadrant 26 (3): (Mar 1982): 47-50. 43. `Hume'sargument about the unobserved', in Studies in the Eighteenth Century ed. J. Hardy & J. Eade (Oxford, 1983), pp. 189-206. 44. `Velikovskybecome respectable', Quadrant 27 (10) (Oct 1983): 75-76. -7-

45. `Paralytic epistemology,orthe soundless scream', NewIdeas in Psychology 2(1984): 21-24. [a comment on P.Feyerabend, `On the limits of research', NewIdeas in Psychology 2(1984): 3-7]

46. `Arejoinder to Clube and Napier's`Velikovskians in collision'', Quadrant 28 (1/2) (Jan/Feb, 1984): 35. [a reply to S.V.M. Clube and W.M. Napier,`Velikovskians in collision', Quadrant 28 (1/2): 33-34]

47. `The feminists and the universities', Quadrant 28 (9) (Sept, 1984): 8. 48. `Universities and feminists once more', Quadrant 28 (11) (Nov, 1984): 60. 49. `Jobs for the girls: feminist vapours', Quadrant 29 (5) (May 1985): 34-35. [comment in P.Shrubb, `Jobs for the girls', Quadrant 29 (7) (July 1985): 14-16]

50. ` and the Jazz Age', Encounter 65 (1) (June 1985): 65-74. [also as `Cole Porter and Karl Popper,orthe Jazz Age in the philosophyofscience, Proceedings of the Rus- sellian Society 10 (1985): 14-30; and reprinted as ch. 1 of The Plato Cult;replies to objections in Encounter 65 (3): 78-9, 65 (4): 80, 65 (5): 78, 66 (1): 78, 66 (2): 80, 66 (3): 79, 66 (5): 77 and 67 (3): 79]

51. `Afarewell to arts: Marxism, semiotics and feminism', Quadrant 30 (5): (May,1986): 8-11. [comment in P.Stavropoulos, `Conservative intellectuals and feminism', Australian Journal of Political Sci- ence 25 (1990): 218-27]

52. `Afarewell to arts: Replies to David Stove,with his rebuttal', Quadrant 30 (7/8) (Ju- ly/Aug 1986): 9-15. 53. `The Columbus argument', Commentary 84 (6) (1987): 57-58. [reply to objections in Commentary 85 (4): 9-10; more fully as `Whyyou should be a conservative', Proceed- ings of the Russellian Society 13 (1988): 1-13; comments in R. Kimball, `One very simple principle', The New Criterion 17 (3) (Nov, 1998): 4-15]

54. `What is wrong with our thoughts?: a neo-positivist credo', Proceedings of the Russellian Society 12 (1987): 1-20, repr.asch. 7 of The Plato Cult. 55. `Righting wrongs' Commentary 85(1) (Jan 1988): 57-59. 56. `Ahero not of our time', Quadrant 32 (5) (May 1988): 40-43. 57. `Freud: business arising out of the minutes', Quadrant 32 (9) (Sept 1988): 40-41. [comment on F.Crews, Skeptical Engagements;replies in R. Conway,`Roasting Freud with a Stove', Quad- rant 33 (1/2) (Jan/Feb 1989): 58-9 and J. Covell, `Short notes on Sigmund Freud', 33 (1/2) (Jan/Feb 1990): 60] -8-

58. `The oracles and their cessation: a tribute to Julian Jaynes', Encounter 72 (4) (Apr 1989): 30-38. [reply to objection in Encounter 73 (2): 79]

59. `The end of history?', The National Interest 17 (Fall 1989): 97-98, repr.in Quadrant 33 (10): (Oct 1989): 32-33. [comment on F.Fukuyama, The End of History]

60. `Changing the world', Salisbury Review (June, 1989): 48-50. 61. `D'Holbach'sdream: the central claim of the Enlightenment', Quadrant 33 (12): (Dec 1989): 28-31. 62. `The diabolical place: a secret of the Enlightenment', Encounter 74 (4) (May 1990): 9-15. 63. `O Pioneers! ...', Encounter 74 (5) (June 1990): 38-40. 64. `Enlightenment, racism and racial prejudice', Salisbury Review 8(4) (June, 1990): 16-20. [original, `Enlightenment and racial prejudice'; also as `Racial and other antagonisms' Proceedings of the Russellian Society 14 (1989): 1-10; comment in P.Coleman, `Quadrant takes a mortal blow', SMH 18/11/97, p. 19.]

65. `The intellectual capacity of women', Proceedings of the Russellian Society 15 (1990): 1-16. [comment in J. Teichman, `The intellectual capacity of David Stove', Philosophy 76 (2001): 149-57.]

66. `The demons and Dr Dawkins', American Scholar 61 (1) (1992): 67-78. [on R. Dawkins, The Sel®sh Gene; originally in Proceedings of the Russellian Society 16 (1991): 1-25; replies to critics in American Scholar 61 (3) (1992): 480]

67. `Anew religion', Philosophy 67 (1992): 233-240 (www.royalinstitutephilosophy/arti- cles/stove_new_religion.htm). [criticism in M. Levin, `Stove ongene worship', Philosophy 68 (1993): 240-3]

68. `The subjection of John Stuart Mill: the intellectual capacity of women and equality be- tween the sexes', Philosophy 68 (1993): 5-13. [replies by B. Brecher,`Whypatronize feminists: A reply to Stove onMill', Philosophy 68 (1993): 397-400; by I. Thiel, `On Stove onMill on Women', Philosophy 69 (1994): 100-1; by F.G. Downing, `Acynical re- sponse to the subjection of women', Philosophy 69 (1994): 229-30; by D.G. Brown, `Stove's reading of Mill', Utilitas 10 (1998): 122-6.]

69. `So you think you are a Darwinian?', Philosophy 69 (1994): 267-77 (www.royalinsti- tutephilosophy/articles/stove_darwinian.htm). [originally `Errors of heredity,orthe irrelevance of Darwinism to human life', Proceedings of the Russellian Society 18 (1993)] -9-

BOOK REVIEWS 1. N. Goodman, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 33 (1955): 128-132. 2. A.J. Ayer, Philosophical Essays, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 34 (1956): 60-5. 3. R. Harrod, Foundations of Inductive Logic, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 36 (1958): 71-9. 4. E. Nagel, Sovereign Reason and Logic Without Metaphysics, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 36 (1958): 151-3. 5. `Bertrand Russell, Andersonian', reviewof"B. Russell", The Wisdom of the West, Nation no. 35 (16 Jan 1960): 22-3 [revealed the true authorship; see C. Spadoni, `Who wrote Bertrand Russell's Wisdom of the West? Papersofthe American Bibliographical Society 80 (1986): 359-67; L. Cumming, `Aremarkable philosophical hybrid', Quadrant 33 (1/2) (Jan/Feb 1989): 61-2]

6. `Beard-and-sandals dept.?', reviewofA.G. Price, ed, The Humanities in Australia, The Observer 30 Apr 1960: 26. 7. J.J. Katz, The Problem of Induction and its Solution, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 41 (1963): 269-72. 8. A. Flew, Hume'sPhilosophy of Belief,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 41 (1963): 427-32. 9. `Darwin'sGrandfather', reviewofD.King-Hele, Erasmus Darwin, Quadrant 8(2) (June/July,1964): 79-80. 10. I. Schef¯er, The Anatomy of Inquiry,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 43 (1965): 109-13. 11. B. Skyrms, Choice and Chance,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 46 (1968): 189-91. 12. W.Salmon, The Foundations of Scienti®c Inference,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 47 (1969): 86-9. 13. I. Lakatos, ed, The Problem of Inductive Logic, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 47 (1969): 243-8. [comment in P.Baillie, `Falsi®ability and probability', Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 48 (1970): 99-100]

14. S. Blackburn, Reason and Prediction, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 52 (1974): 72-4. 15. B.A. Brody, Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 53 (1975): 283-4. 16. I. Hacking, The Emergence of Probability,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 54 (1976): 180-1. -10-

17. T.Penelhum, Hume,Dialogue (Canada): 15 (1976): 505-9. 18. `Galton'seugenics', reviewofD.W.Forest, Fr ancis Galton, Quadrant 20 (3) (Mar 1976): 51-3. 19. `Cricket vs republicanism', reviewofR.Robinson, On Top Down Under: Australia's CricketCaptains, Quadrant 22 (6) (June 1977): 36-7; repr.in Rep (Newsletter of the Re- publican Movement of Aotearoa NewZealand Inc) Aug 1997 and in I. Salusinszky, ed, The OxfordBook of Australian Essays (Melbourne, 1997), pp. 169-70. 20. B. Stroud, Hume,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 56 (1978): 90-2. 21. `Konrad Lorenz', reviewofA.Nesbitt, Konrad Lorenz, Quadrant 22 (2) (Feb 1978): 72-3. 22. `Bradman', reviewofI.Rosenwater, Sir Donald Bradman, Quadrant 23 (5) (May 1979): 70-1. 23. `Alovesome thing', reviewofM.Had®eld, AHistory of British Gardening,Quadrant 24 (3) (Mar 1980): 78-9. 24. `The green world', reviewofJ.H. Parry, The Discovery of South America, Quadrant 24 (6) (June 1980): 78-80. 25. `Minute detail', reviewofP.Coustillas, London and the Life of LiteratureinLate Victori- an England: The Diary of George Gissing,Quadrant 25 (4): 71-2. 26. `The sweetest game', reviewofA.Ross, ed, The Penguin Cricketer'sCompanion, Quad- rant 26 (1/2) (Jan/Feb 1982): 123. 27. T.L. Beauchamp and A. Rosenberg, Hume and the Problem of Causation, Times Literary Supplement no. 4116 (19 Feb 1982): 182. 28. `English cottage gardens', reviewofA.Scott James, The Cottage Garden, Quadrant 27 (5) (May 1983): 76-7. 29. `Whyhav e philosophers?', reviewofS.A. Grave, AHistory of Philosophy in Australia, Quadrant 29 (7) (July,1985): 82-3. 30. I.J. Good, Good Thinking,Critical Philosophy 2(1) (1985): 85-6. 31. `Et in Arcadia ego', reviewofL.Gilbert, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Quadrant 30 (12) (Dec 1986): 78-9. 32. `An Oxford companion to Ð gardens!' Quadrant 31 (6) (June 1987): 77-8, reviewof The OxfordCompanion to Gardens ed. G. & S. Jellicoe, P.Goode & M. Lancaster. 33. `Bombs aw ay', reviewofA.Kenny, The Ivory Tower,American Scholar 56 (1) (Winter 1987): 148-150. -11-

34. A. Olding, Modern Biology and Natural Theology,Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 69 (1991): 360-2.

UNPUBLISHED 1. `Universals as atoms', 1953. 2. `Bradleyonthe principle of individuation', 1954. 3. `Location', 1955. 4. `Strawson on induction', 1955. 5. `Bernoulli'stheorems and logical probability', 1960s. 6. `The revolution at Berkeley', roneoed, 1966. 7. `The Trathen affair', 1970. 8. `Inductivism and arguing to win', ANZAAS, 1984. 9. `Eternal golden sales?', reviewofD.Hofstadter, Metamagical Themas c. 1986. 10. On living retired, c. 1987. 11. `The hairsbreadth escape', 1990. [Enlightenment, communism, electricity]

12. `David Armstrong, Challis Professor of Philosophy', 1991. 13. Against anti-smoking, 1993.

LETTERS

Letters of interest include one in Honi Soit 23 Mar 1981, accusing the cartoonist Patrick Cook of being a liar [see J. Bedford, `Portrait of the cartoonist' National Times Sept 14-20, 1980, p. 41], and one in Quadrant 34(10) (Oct 1990), on Professor Bill Rubinstein'stactics in the campaign to discoverwar criminals; Bulletin 4/12/65, p. 44.

OBITUARIES OF DAV ID STOVE

By D.M. Armstrong, Quadrant 38 (7/8) (July/Aug 1994): 36-7; summarised in University of Syd- neyNews 26 (21) (17 Aug 1994): 4, Australian Academy of the Humanities Proceedings 1994, pp. 68-70 and in Australasian J.ofPhilosophy 72 (1994): 410. By J. Franklin, Australian 21/6/94, repr.in AAHPSSS newsletter no. 48 (1994). By L. Reinhardt, delivered to SydneyUniversity Arts Faculty. -12-

An appreciation in R. Kimball, `Who was David Stove?', The NewCriterion (Mar 1997): 21-8, expanded in Against the Idols of the Age (www.newcriterion.com/constant/idolsintro.htm).