LIS Evidence Base Summary Deck Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LIS Evidence Base Summary Deck Final Liverpool City Region Local Industrial Strategy: Summary of Evidence Liverpool City Region is a growing economy . GVA Growth 2007-2017 Liverpool City Region is a £32bn economy - measured £35,000 130 by Gross Value Added (GVA). In the last decade, we have added over £6bn to our economy, against the £30,000 125 backdrop of the deepest recession the UK has experienced since the Second World War. 120 £25,000 115 Our economy stagnated during the recession, while £20,000 others were shrinking, and it took longer for the full 110 impact to be felt in LCR. This means it has taken us £15,000 105 longer to recover, while other economies started to rebound as early as 2009, our recovery did not start £10,000 100 until 2013. £5,000 95 We are now experiencing strong levels of growth, for £0 90 three of the last four years we have grown faster than the 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 national average, and between 2016 and 2017, our GVA £ millions Indexed growth (Right Hand Side) economy grew by more than 5%. Source: ONS 1 . but we have performance gaps to close GVA per head (2010-2017) A delayed recovery has widened the gap between 28,000 LCR and the UK in terms of relative output, and UK 26,000 productivity. 24,000 North West 22,000 Our economy generates £20.4k of GVA for every LCR resident, 77% of the UK level. Since 2010, the gap has 20,000 Liverpool City Region increased from £4.5k to £6.7k per person. 18,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Our productivity (GVA per filled job) tracks much closer GVA per filled job (2010-2017) to national levels, and is 89% of the UK level. Despite 54,000 this, every filled job in the LCR produces £6k less 52,000 UK output than the UK. 50,000 48,000 North West 46,000 44,000 Liverpool City 42,000 Region 40,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: ONS 2 . .and so, to close these gaps, we need to improve our performance against the five foundations In October 2018, HM Government published a Policy Prospectus for Local Industrial Strategies to “build on unique local strengths to ensure every community, and the country, reaches their economic potential and creates high quality good jobs.” Local Industrial Strategies should boost productivity and earning potential across local areas by focusing on the five foundations of productivity. 3 1 – People 1.5 million peopleOur live population in the City Region, andis ourgrowing population has grown year we have experienced a slow rate of population growth, growing slower than any other LEP. % Change in population by LEP (1997 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -2017) London South East Midlands Source: Mid Year SwindonPopulation Estimates and Wiltshire – Greater Cambridge and Greater… but at a relatively slow rate . Leicester and Leicestershire West of England Hertfordshire South East Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Coast to Capital Greater Lincolnshire - The Marches on New Anglia -year since 2003. However, comparatively, Coventry and Warwickshire Oxfordshire Thames Valley Berkshire Buckinghamshire Thames Valley Heart of the South West Solent Dorset Enterprise M3 Gloucestershire Greater Birmingham and Solihull Leeds City Region York, North Yorkshire and East… Derby, Derbyshire, Nottingham… Greater Manchester Worcestershire Sheffield City Region Black Country Cheshire and Warrington Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire Humber Lancashire Tees Valley North East 5 Cumbria Liverpool City Region … and we have a number of ageing communities Dependency Ratio (2017) At the City Region level, the ageing population is less prominent than for other areas of the UK. However, 0.70 0.68 this masks the prevalence of the ageing society in 0.66 other areas of the City Region, particularly Sefton and 0.64 Wirral. 0.62 0.60 In both of these areas, the dependency ratio is also 0.58 considerably higher than the UK level, reflective of the 0.56 high proportion of residents age 65+ and smaller 0.54 Working Age Populations. In these areas, the Working 0.52 Age Population face a greater burden in supporting 0.50 the ageing and youth population. 0.48 0.46 0.44 Halton Knowsley Liverpool Sefton St. Helens Wirral Dependency Ratio UK Level Source: Mid Year Population Estimates 6 Overall, our Working Age Population is growing. We have a Working Age Population of 977k which has grown (with fluctuations) over the last 30 years. Liverpool City Region Working Age Population (1997-2017) 990 980 Thousands 970 960 950 940 930 920 910 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: Mid Year Population Estimates 7 . And the WAP is becoming more skilled. Our skills profile is improving. Since 2004, the proportion of highly skilled residents has increased, at the same time, the proportion of residents with no qualifications has fallen. Change in qualification levels (2004-2018) 35% 33% 30% 25% 24% 19% 19% 20% 18% 16% 15% 15% 15% 10% 11% 10% 5% 0% % with NVQ4+ - aged 16-64 % with NVQ3 only - aged 16-64 % with NVQ2 only - aged 16-64 % with NVQ1 only - aged 16-64 % with no qualifications (NVQ) - aged 16-64 Jan 2004-Dec 2004 Jan 2018-Dec 2018 Source: Annual Population Survey 8 . But we need more highly skilled workers While our skills profile is improving, comparatively, we have a low proportion of highly skilled workers (NVQ4+), and a high proportion of residents with no qualifications. A highly skilled population is a key component of a competitive, productive economy. Qualification levels of the Working Age Population (2018) 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% % with NVQ4+ - aged 16-64 % with NVQ3 only - aged 16-64 % with NVQ2 only - aged 16-64 % with NVQ1 only - aged 16-64 % with no qualifications (NVQ) - aged 16-64 Source: Annual Population Survey LCR North West UK 9 Our employment rate is growing. Employment Rate (2004 -2018) Each year a growing number of our residents are 76% employed, with significant growth in our employment 74% 72% rate from 2014 onwards. This fast rate of growth has 70% closed the gap considerably between the LCR 68% employment rate and that of the UK. 66% 64% 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 As of 2018 72% of our Working Age Population were LCR North West UK in employment, compared to 74% in the North West and the UK rate of 75%. Unemployment Rate (2004 -2018) 12% At the same time, our unemployment rate has fallen 10% significantly from 6.2% in 2004, to 4.1% in 2018. As of 8% 2018, the unemployment rate was lower than that of 6% both the North West and the UK. 4% 2% 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Liverpool City Region North West UK Source: Annual Population Survey 10 With 26% of our Working Age Population currently inactive, LEPs in the UK, this is Economic Inactivity Rate (2018) . but a high proportion of our WAP is inactive. 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% a key driver of our output gap with the UK 5% 0% Black Country Tees Valley Liverpool City Region Greater Birmingham and Solihull Source: Annual Population Survey North East Greater Manchester Leeds City Region we have the third highest rate of economic inactivity Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Derby, Derbyshire, Nottingham… Leicester and Leicestershire . Sheffield City Region Lancashire Humber London Greater Lincolnshire Cheshire and Warrington Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire Coventry and Warwickshire Solent South East Dorset New Anglia Coast to Capital York, North Yorkshire and East… Cumbria o Greater Cambridge and Greater… f all Hertfordshire South East Midlands Heart of the South West The Marches West of England Worcestershire Buckinghamshire Thames Valley Swindon and Wiltshire Thames Valley Berkshire 11 Oxfordshire Enterprise M3 Gloucestershire . and disconnected from the world of work Liverpool City Region Labour Supply (2018) We have 274k residents that are economically inactive, a high proportion of these (30%) do not participate in the labour force due to long term sickness. Long term sickness is highest in St Helens Working Age Population WAP 968k 100% (37.4%) and lowest in Liverpool (26.9%). Of our working age population, we have a proportionately Unemployed 25k higher number of residents that do not want a job when Self compared with the UK. In addition to sickness there are a Economically Active Employees 620k employed 74% number of reasons for this, such as stay at home parents 73k and people who have retired early – essentially lifestyle Wants choices. a job 47k Economic Inactivity by reason Does not Economically Inactive Long-term sick (30%), Student (23%), want 26% Looking after family/home(23%), Retired (12%), Temporary sick (2%), a job Other (10%) 201 k Source: Annual Population Survey 12 Inactivity is underpinned by complex health-related challenges Male Life EXpectancy at Birth (2018) 80 Our economic inactivity rate reflects the range of complex health and wellbeing challenges residents in 78 the City Region face: 76 • One in four people of working age in the LCR have 74 limiting health conditions; Halton Knowsley Liverpool Sefton St. Helens Wirral • Life expectancy is two and a half years lower than England Average for England; Source: Public Health England Prevalence of Common Mental Health Disorders (2018) • The prevalence of ill health is increasing; and 30 • There is a high prevalence of mental health 25 disorders1. 20 15 10 Unfavourable health conditions in the LCR contributes to 5 both the employment and productivity gap. 0 Halton Knowsley Liverpool Sefton St.
Recommended publications
  • Huw Jenkins, LCR Combined Authority
    SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OVERVIEW Huw Jenkins, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority LCR European Structural and Investment Fund (ESIF) Strategy • LCR awarded £193m to deliver ESIF Strategy • Covers: ERDF, ESF and Rural Development • All calls focused on delivery of agreed local priorities • DCLG manages the ESIF Programme: appraises project applications and awards offer letters ERDF Projects Overview PA 1 R&D/Innovation PA 3 SME Competitiveness PA 4 Transition to Low Carbon • Sensor City • Business Growth Programme • Low Carbon EcoInnovatory • LCR 4.0 • New Markets 2 • LCR Future Energy • Health Enterprise Innovation • The Enterprise Hub • NPIF Exchange • Specialist Manufacturing Service • Innovate2Succeed • Place Marketing for Investment • LCR Activate • SME/International Trade • SUD INVESTMENTS (PA 4 & PA6) • NPIF • Thermal Road • Baltic Creative (Norfolk St) • NPIF What is a SUD Strategy? • Part of LCR ERDF allocation • Government asked Core City Regions to develop SUD Strategies in 2015 • SUD strategies set out integrated actions to tackle challenges affecting urban areas • The Combined Authority will have a greater say in project selection as an Intermediary Body • The local ESIF Partnership Committee will continue to provide advice on local strategic fit to the Combined Authority and DCLG • DCLG appraises and issues contracts to successful projects as before Underpinning Strategies The following strategies have shaped the development of the LCR SUD Strategy: • European Structural and Investment Fund Strategy • LCR
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7A , Item 7. PDF 406 KB
    BLACKPOOL COUNCIL PEER REVIEW OF INTERNAL AUDIT AGAINST THE UK PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT STANDARDS CARRIED OUT BY Stephanie Donaldson Jean Gleave ASSESSMENT DATES: 8 – 10 June 2016 FINAL REPORT DATE: 13th October 2016 1. Introduction 2. Approach / Methodology 3. Conclusion: Overall Assessment 4. Observations / Recommendations Appendix 1 Review Team Experience / Qualifications Appendix 2 Detailed Assessment Table Appendix 3 Action Table Appendix 4 Additional Points for Consideration Blackpool Council Peer Review of Internal Audit against the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards 1 Introduction 1.1 All principal local authorities and other relevant bodies subject to the Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2015 (amended) must make provision for internal audit in accordance with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS) as well as the (CIPFA) Local Government Application Note. 1.2 A professional, independent and objective internal audit service is one of the key elements of good governance in local government. 1.3 The PSIAS require that an external assessment of an organisation’s internal audit function is carried out once every five years by a qualified, independent assessor or assessment team from outside of the organisation. External assessments can be in the form of a full external assessment, or a self- assessment with independent external validation. 1.4 The North West Chief Audit Executives’ Group (NWCAE) has established a ‘peer-review’ process that is managed and operated by the constituent authorities. This process addresses the requirement of external assessment through ‘self-assessment with independent external validation’ and this report presents the summary findings of the review carried out on behalf of Blackpool Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Combined Authority End of Year Review 2020-2021 Pdf 447 Kb
    LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY To: The Metro Mayor and Members of the Combined Authority Meeting: 4 June 2021 Authority/Authorities Affected: All EXEMPT/CONFIDENTIAL ITEM: No REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY END OF YEAR REVIEW 2020- 2021 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to highlight some of the achievements of the LCR Combined Authority during the 2020-21 municipal year. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 It is recommended that the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority: (a) agree the End of Year Review 2020-21; and (b) any amendments/insertions be made in consultation with the Metro Mayor and Chief Executive. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) is the Combined Authority for the Liverpool City Region, an area that covers the metropolitan county of Merseyside and the adjacent Borough of Halton. The Combined Authority was established on 1st April 2014 by statutory instrument under the provisions of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. 3.2 The LCR Combined Authority is led by the directly elected Metro Mayor Steve Rotheram and brings together Liverpool City Region‟s six local authorities which are Halton Borough Council, Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council, Liverpool City Council, Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council, St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council and Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (“the six Constituent Authorities ”). In addition to the Metro Mayor, the membership of the Combined Authority also includes the Leaders of the five constituent Local Authorities, the elected Mayor of Liverpool City Council, the Chair of the Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), Co-opted and Associate Members and designated Deputy Portfolio Holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Culture & Internationalism Research
    LIVERPOOL CITY REGION CULTURE & INTERNATIONALISM RESEARCH OCTOBER 2020 Cover photography credits: Front cover: (left) Slavery Rememberance Day Libation – Pete Carr, (right) Kyle Glenn Back cover: Kirschner Amao This research was commissioned in March 2020 and published in October 2020. The report and associated documents use the term Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) in relation to ethnic minority people. This is based on its use in many of the data sources cited within this research, including the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The International Working Group (IWG) acknowledges that there has been debate on the usage of this term for some time, with it becoming increasingly contested during the life of this research. The IWG appreciates that there are alternative and more appropriate ways of describing people from an ethnic minority background and will ensure this is reflected in all future work and communications. International Working Group Since the completion of this research, the International Working Group has been renamed the International Strategy and Delivery Group (ISDG). This has not been retrospectively amended in the report, however, the IWG will be referred to as the ISDG in all future communications. 2 LIVERPOOL CITY REGION CULTURE & INTERNATIONALISM RESEARCH Contents Introduction ...................................................................................4 Section 1 - Residents ......................................................................8 Section 2 - International Students ................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Liverpool City Region Combined
    MEETING OF THE LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY To: The Members of the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority Dear Member, You are requested to attend a meeting of the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority to be held on Friday, 22nd January, 2021 at 1.00pm. This meeting is being held remotely. The meeting will be live webcast. To access the webcast please go to the Combined Authority’s website at the time of the meeting and follow the instructions on the page. If you have any queries regarding this meeting, please contact Trudy Bedford on telephone number (0151) 330 1330. Yours faithfully Chief Executive WEBCASTING NOTICE This meeting will be filmed by the Combined Authority for live and/or subsequent broadcast on the Combined Authority’s website. The whole of the meeting will be filmed, except where there are confidential or exempt items. If you do not wish to have your image captured or if you have any queries regarding the webcasting of the meeting please contact the Democratic Services Officer on the above number or email [email protected]. A Fair Processing Notice is available on the Combined Authority’s website at https://www.liverpoolcityregion-ca.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/Fair-Processing- Notice-CA-Meeting-Video-Recording.pdf. (Established pursuant to section 103 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 as the Halton, Knowsley, Liverpool, St Helens, Sefton and Wirral Combined Authority) LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE LCR COMBINED AUTHORITY HELD ON 18 DECEMBER 2020 (Pages 1 - 10) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Alternative Paths to City- Region Policy and Governance
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository CONSTRUCTING ALTERNATIVE PATHS TO CITY- REGION POLICY AND GOVERNANCE John Harrison Department of Geography Loughborough University Loughborough Leicestershire United Kingdom LE11 3TU +44(0)1509 228198 [email protected] Draft – June 2015 Hincks, S., and Deas, I., (Eds.) Alternative Paths to Territorial Policy and Governance. Routledge: London. 1 | Page CONSTRUCTING ALTERNATIVE PATHS TO CITY- REGION POLICY AND GOVERNANCE “… regional economic growth has to some extent become a symbolic area of policy where governments have to look interested without necessarily solving the problems.” (Niklasson, 2007, p.27) 1. INTRODUCTION: AN ALTERNATIVE TO WHAT? Something which is not hard to find in narratives about territorial governance and policymaking is alternatives, with intellectual and practical debates over regional economic development proving to be no exception. Intellectual alternatives have been derived, in the main, from the either/or debate between ‘territoriality’ and ‘relationality’ as opposing ontological and epistemological standpoints which characterised regional studies throughout the 1990s and 2000s. As avant-garde relational approaches were championed as superior alternatives to supposedly more antiquated territorial-scalar approaches, the legacy of this territorial/relational divide in regional studies remains evident through a lexicon of spatial grammar distinguishing ‘spaces of flows’ from ‘spaces of places’
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region and Warrington Sub-Regional Improvement Board
    Record of meeting Liverpool City Region and Warrington sub-regional improvement board 09 May 2018 Attendance Sub-regional improvement board members Judy Boyce Liverpool City Council Tim Warren Catholic Diocese of Liverpool Damian Cunningham Diocese of Shrewsbury Hillary Smith Warrington Borough Council Jill Farrell Halton Borough Council Nicky Bevington Regional Schools Commissioner’s Office, Lancashire and West Yorkshire Invited representatives Yvonne Gandy Teaching Schools Council Pat Speed Head of Great Cosby Catholic Primary School Neil Dyment Teaching Schools Representative Tim Long Head of Bridgewater High School Kirsty Haw Teaching Schools Representative DfE officials in attendance included Suzanne Romano Chair Discussion points Sub-regional improvement board members were reminded of the confidentiality of the papers and discussion at the meeting and that they must declare any actual or potential interests that might impact upon their impartiality in the review and prioritisation of applications. Conflicts of interest were dealt with in line with the published terms of reference. Strategic School Improvement Fund (SSIF) round 3 An overview was provided of SSIF round 3 applications. Sub-regional improvement board members considered the applications and fed in their views on: 1. the fit of the proposal with the identified sub-regional priorities, including whether the schools selected were those that would most benefit from the support; and 2. whether the applicant and specified providers have the capacity and capability to successfully deliver the activity such that it delivers the desired outcomes. The views in the meeting on round 3 applications were broadly in support of the applications submitted; on the whole, the applications were viewed as thoughtful and collaborative.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposition for Local Government Reorganisation in Lancashire
    Proposition for Local Government Reorganisation in Lancashire September 2020 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Case for change and our proposal .......................................................................................................... 6 2 Driving economic recovery and levelling up ................................................................................... 14 3 Innovative delivery in health and social care ................................................................................. 21 4 Better community services ..................................................................................................................... 24 5 Principles of working ................................................................................................................................ 28 6 Next steps and how to take this forward .......................................................................................... 31 Appendix 1 – Economic snapshot .................................................................................................................. 33 1 Executive Summary 2 Executive Summary Current context and the emerging proposal Lancashire is a £30.8bn polycentric economy with 1.5m residents, 732,000 jobs and 53,000 businesses. The county has significant strengths in advanced manufacturing and engineering with innovation assets and major companies. But
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Powerhouse Factsheet Key Figures on the City Regions in the Northern Powerhouse June 2015
    Northern Powerhouse factsheet Key figures on the city regions in the Northern Powerhouse June 2015 Introduction The idea of a ‘Northern Powerhouse’ was first introduced in June 2014 by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, in a speech in Manchester. He made the case that the lack of economic and physical connections between the cities and city regions of the North of England was holding back their growth, with significant implications for the national economy. In the Chancellor’s own words: “the whole is less than the sum of its parts…so the powerhouse of London dominates more and more.” For Osborne, the solution to this challenge is the creation of a Northern Powerhouse – “not one city, but a collection of northern cities - sufficiently close to each other that combined they can take on the world.” Since the Chancellor’s initial speech, a raft of interventions have been announced to help turn the rhetoric of a Northern Powerhouse into reality – including the Greater Manchester Devolution Deal, Transport for the North, and the Northern Transport Strategy. With the creation of a Northern Powerhouse set to be a key priority for the new Government, this briefing sets out the current economic profile of the key city regions across the North and compares their performance with that of London and of the UK as a whole. Reflecting the policy pledges contained within the Conservative manifesto, for the purposes of this analysis the Northern Powerhouse is made up of the city regions of Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, Hull and
    [Show full text]
  • Local Economic Strategy Development Under Rdas and Leps: Applying the Lens of the Multiple Streams Framework
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Nottingham Trent Institutional Repository (IRep) Local Economic Strategy Development under RDAs and LEPs: Applying the Lens of the Multiple Streams Framework Will Rossiter, Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom Liz Price, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom Abstract Following the decision to abolish the Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) in England by the newly elected Coalition Government in 2010, Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) were introduced to drive economic development at a local level. However, the limited Government prescription as to both the form and function of LEPs has contributed to a fundamental ambiguity as to their roles and ‘legitimate spheres’ of activity. In the context of this ambiguity, this paper uses the Multiple Streams Framework (Kingdon, 1995) to analyse the challenges faced by RDAs and LEPs in developing effective economic development strategies. The paper identifies the dimensions of strategic capability that LEPs must develop if they are to mature as effective agents of local economic development in England. Keywords Economic development, economic development strategies, economic policy, Regional Development Agencies, Local Enterprise Partnerships, Multiple Streams Framework, policy entrepreneur. A shorter version of this paper has been published in Local Economy, OnlineFirst, 29th August 2013 and Local Economy November/December 2013 vol. 28 no. 7-8 852-862 by SAGE Publications Ltd, All rights reserved. © Will Rossiter and Liz Price http://lec.sagepub.com/content/28/7-8/852 Corresponding author Will Rossiter [email protected] 01158482875 Nottingham Business School Nottingham Trent University 8th Floor, Newton Building, Goldsmith Street, Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Birmingham a City Region Powered by Technological Innovation
    Greater Birmingham A city region powered by technological innovation The Local Enterprise Partnership’s City Deal Proposal 5 July 2012 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Contents 1. Foreword 2 2. Executive Summary 3 3. Economic Overview 4 4. Our City Deal 5 5. What our proposals will deliver 5 6. Phase 2 City Deal 6 7. Governance 6 8. Conclusion 7 9. Our Proposals Proposal 1: GBS Finance 8 Proposal 2: Skills for Growth Accelerator 14 Proposal 3: Development of Public Assets 17 Accelerator Proposal 4: Life Sciences Accelerator 22 Proposal 5: Green Deal Accelerator 26 UNCLASSIFIED 1 UNCLASSIFIED Foreword We are delighted to submit this joint City Deal proposal to Government. Ours is a bold agenda for change designed to create the conditions necessary for long term sustainable growth. It reflects a shared vision of the private and public sector partners that form the LEP to become a globally competitive city region. Our proposals seek to exploit our assets and address our key economic challenges. They seek shared growth and opportunity with our partners, our businesses, and our communities. The City Deal will not only support immediate job creation but also improve our skills base and invest in our infrastructure to meet the economic needs of the future. Key to driving the successful implementation of our ambitious plans will be world class technology. While our City Deal reflects the unique set of circumstances in the Greater Birmingham and Solihull area, it will also prove to be the key to the recovery of UK Plc. It comes at a time when there is growing optimism in the West Midlands that our strong manufacturing base and growing export market will produce the sustained economic growth that the country is seeking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth and Decline of Cities and Regions
    Ruth Lupton and Anne Power The growth and decline of cities and regions Report Original citation: Lupton, Ruth and Power, Anne (2004) The growth and decline of cities and regions. CASE Brookings census briefs, 1. Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27358/ Originally available from Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) Available in LSE Research Online: March 2010 © 2004 The authors LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. CENTRE FOR ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION An ESRC Research Centre The Growth and Decline of Cities and Regions Ruth Lupton and Anne Power July 2004 INTRODUCTION The London School of Economics has a founding commitment to understanding the causes of social and economic change. It works to show changes in patterns of development internationally, whether at a large or CASE-BROOKINGS small scale.Within the UK and in the capital in particular, it tries to keep a CENSUS BRIEFS finger on the pulse of change and to influence both directly and indirectly the development of policy.
    [Show full text]