EU-Turkey Relations Theories, Institutions, and Policies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EU-Turkey Relations Theories, Institutions, and Policies EU-Turkey Relations Theories, Institutions, and Policies Edited by Wulf Reiners · Ebru Turhan EU-Turkey Relations “Never have relations between Turkey and the European Union been so tense. Yet rarely have we had the opportunity to realize how important this relationship is, for good and ill. At such a critical juncture, this edited volume by Reiners and Turhan provides a much needed theoretical, empirical and policy compass to guide us through the turbulent waters of what remains an existentially important relationship for both the European Union and Turkey.” —Nathalie Tocci, Special Advisor to EU HRVP Josep Borrell, and Director of the Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), Rome, Italy “This is an important and original contribution. It offers concrete suggestions concerning how to end the current stalemate in Turkey-EU relations and recreate the basis of a new partnership. It should appeal to a broad audience of scholars, students and practitioners.” —Ziya Öni¸s, Professor, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey “This volume amounts to a quintessential handbook of EU-Turkey relations after 2009. The theoretical and empirical breadth of its contributions and their state-of-the art analyses in light of domestic, bilateral and global influences provide valuable insights for the interested public, policymakers, and experts alike. Instead of reaffirming stereotypes, the authors highlight the complexities of the relationship, providing an excellent basis for future studies as much as further political debate.” —Thomas Diez, Professor, University of Tübingen, Germany “This volume focuses on the last decade of the relations between the EU and Turkey when profound changes have taken place both in Europe and the World. The book’s unique contribution rests on the fact that it introduces a systematic and multidimensional analysis of the field bringing together studies on theories, actors, and policies. It should be praised as the result of a fruitful collaboration between scholars from the EU and Turkey—all of them European—when relations at the political level ran into hurdles.” —Çi˘gdem Nas, Secretary General, Economic Development Foundation (IKV) / Associate Professor, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey “With excellent timing Reiners and Turhan have brought together a distinguished team of experts to look at the dynamics of a relationship that is often problematic but of critical importance to both the EU and Turkey. The volume covers not only the current disputes between the two sides but offers a balanced, thoughtful but critical analysis of the multi-faceted EU-Turkey relationship over the past decade or so, providing us with an excellent and comprehensive study.” —Geoffrey Edwards, Senior Fellow and Emeritus Reader, University of Cambridge, UK Wulf Reiners · Ebru Turhan Editors EU-Turkey Relations Theories, Institutions, and Policies Editors Wulf Reiners Ebru Turhan German Development Institute / Turkish-German University Deutsches Institut für Istanbul, Turkey Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) Bonn, Germany ISBN 978-3-030-70889-4 ISBN 978-3-030-70890-0 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70890-0 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa- tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface Gülü seven dikenine katlanır—who loves the rose should put up with its thorns. When we started the systematic re-assessment of the ever-evolving EU–Turkey relations more than three years ago, we saw the urgent need for a volume with handbook character that provided an update of the existing literature and a comprehensive study of the new complexities that epitomize the relationship. The world has changed since then more than most would have anticipated, creating an even greater need for this volume. We are happy and relieved that the plan has finally come together, despite the thorny character of this ‘academic rose’. Challenges concerned the complexity and dynamic evolution of the topic and the large scope of the volume, as well as the conditions under which it had to be coordinated, written and prepared. However, the greatness of a rela- tionship lies not only in the challenges it faces, but in how it meets them. This insight—and attitude—is not only true for a comprehensive transna- tional knowledge cooperation project like the volume at hand, but also for EU–Turkey relations in general. We are proud that the idea blossomed as a true, transformative collab- oration between scholars from the EU and Turkey during times when cooperation at the political level has remained troubled. We initiated it during our time at the Turkish German University (TDU) in our capacity as coordinators of the Jean Monnet Module ‘INSITER—Inside the Turkey–EU Relations’ (2016–2019). During joint research activi- ties in Berlin, Brussels, Istanbul and Paris, we conceptualized the central v vi PREFACE elements for the different parts of the volume. The situation in Turkey, in Germany–Turkey and EU–Turkey relations had already become compli- cated, but the view at the ‘Rotonde de la Villette’ in Paris reminded us that EU-Turkey relations encompass manifold components that will endure.1 In recent months, collaborative work on the project helped us bridge the distance between the EU and Turkey as we worked remotely from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, we could not stress enough how fortunate and thankful we are that this fasci- nating group of scholars accepted our invitation to work with us. It is the balanced mix of authors from both the EU and Turkey that makes the volume a particularly rich academic bouquet. In this spirit of cross-border and interdisciplinary collaboration, the volume has benefitted from the Jean Monnet Module INSITER, co- funded by the Erasmus+ program of the EU. It is published with support from the Managing Global Governance (MGG) program of the German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwick- lungspolitik (DIE). While the MGG partner countries are a defined group beyond Turkey, the underlying rationale for and questions around coop- eration with these countries also apply to the EU/Germany–Turkey rela- tionship. MGG facilitates knowledge cooperation, policy dialogue, and training on, with and between emerging economies (or rising powers), Germany and the EU to jointly address global challenges. Central refer- ence points are the global goals prominently enshrined in the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The book is full of evidence of how the EU and Turkey hold the potential for mutually addressing these major economic, social and environmental challenges at the domestic, regional and global levels. The individual political agendas of the EU and Turkey and the common challenges are complex and inter- twined, require both intensified cooperation and deepened analysis, and thus—in their respective and unique way—also speak to the discussion on cooperation with and among rising powers. Since Turkey shares many characteristics of the rising powers on which MGG typically focuses, the volume also contributes to the debate on important overarching ques- tions of inter- and transnational cooperation, and the quest for global partnerships and effective multilateralism in times of global power shifts. 1 This fine building is located in the 19th arrondissement of Paris. It was originally erected as a customs facility and part of the city walls of Paris. The EU-Turkey Customs Union Agreement is one of the relatively stable components of EU-Turkey relations. PREFACE vii In this context, we are particularly grateful that this piece of knowledge co-creation can be published as an open access volume, making it widely available not only in the EU and Turkey but to researchers, policymakers and students around the globe, including but not limited to the MGG network. Clearly, this book would not have been possible without support and maintenance from many sides. We would like to thank our authors for working to a high standard, their trust in us and their perseverance over months. Special thanks go to Dimitris Tsarouhas and Wolfgang Wessels for the encouragement and support to identify the right publishing house. In this context, we are much obliged to the external reviewers for their fertilizing inputs, as well as to Ambra Finotello, Rebecca Roberts, and John Justin Thomyyar from Palgrave for the valuable guidance during the publication process.
Recommended publications
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Gemeinsame Versammlung 389
    9. 6. 54 AMTSBLATT — GEMEINSAME VERSAMMLUNG 389 GEMEINSAME VERSAMMLUNG ORDENTLICHE SITZUNGSPERIODE MAI 1954 PROTOKOLLE DER SITZUNGEN PROTOKOLL DER SITZUNG VOM DIENSTAG, 11. MAI 1954 VORSITZENDER: HERR SCHI AVI Togni, Debre, Bertrand, Caron, Mollet, De- Alterspräsident housse, Laffargue, Sassen und Müller. Eröffnung der ordentlichen Sitzungsperiode 1953/54 Die Sitzung wird um 11 Uhr unterbrochen. Die Sitzung wird um 10.50 Uhr eröffnet. Die Sitzung wird um 11.10 Uhr wieder er­ öffnet. Die ordentliche Sitzungsperiode 1953/54 wird für eröffnet erklärt. Prüfung der Mandate Es spricht der Alterspräsident. Als Berichterstatter nimmt das Wort Abg. Laffargue. Mandatsniederlegung Die Versammlung stimmt dem Prüfungs­ ergebnis des Ausschusses zu, wonach die Prüfung Die Versammlung nimmt die Mandatsnieder­ der folgenden 18 italienischen und 2 belgischen legung der Abgg. Spaak und Vermeylen zur Mitglieder keine Beanstandungen ergeben hat: Kenntnis. Ezio Amadeo, Antonio Boggiano Pico, Enrico Carboni, Antonio Carcaterra, Giuseppe Caron, Aleide De Gasperi, Nicolas Dethier, Amintore Prüfung der Mandate Fanfani, Henri Fayat, Alessandro Gerini, Teresio Guglielmone, Ugo La Malfa, Giovanni Malagodi, Folgende Abgg. werden durch Los zu Mit­ Giuseppe Pella, Stefano Perrier, Alessandro gliedern des Ausschusses zur Prüfung der Man­ Schiavi, Vincenzo Selvaggi, Alberto Simonini, date bestimmt: Attilio Terragni, Giuseppe Togni. 390 EUROPÄISCHE GEMEINSCHAFT FÜR KOHLE UND STAHL 9. 6. 54 Wahl des Präsidiums Ausschuß für Fragen der Investitionen: Das Wort nimmt Abg. Struye. Pierre Billotte, P. A. Blaisse, Roger Car~ cassonne, Antonio Carcaterra, Heinrich Deist, Äbg. De Gasperi wird durch Akklamation Pierre De Smet, Nicolas Dethier, Jean Fohr- zum Präsidenten gewählt. mannj Teresio Guglielmöne, P. J. Kapteyn, Georges Laffargue, Nicolas Margue, Jean Ma- Präsident De Gasperi nimmt die Wahl an roger, Francöis de Menthon, Roger Motz, Giu­ und übernimmt den Vorsitz.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the European Union Promotes Democracy Through Membership Conditionality Ryan Phillips
    Why the European Union Promotes Democracy through Membership Conditionality Ryan Phillips Government & International Relations Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT 06320, USA, E-mail: [email protected] Prepared for 2017 EUSA Conference – Miami, FL DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE Abstract Explanations of why the European Union promotes democracy through membership conditionality provide different accounts of its normative rationale. Constructivists argue that the EU’s membership policy reflects a norm-driven commitment to democracy as fundamental to political legitimacy. Alternatively, rationalists argue that membership conditionality is a way for member states to advance their economic and security interests in the near abroad. The existing research, however, has only a weak empirical basis. A systematic consideration of evidence leads to a novel understanding of EU membership conditionality. The main empirical finding is that whereas the constructivist argument holds true when de facto membership criteria were first established in the 1960s, the rationalist argument more closely aligns with the evidence at the end of the Cold War when accession requirements were formally codified as part of the Copenhagen Criteria (1993). Keywords: democracy promotion, political conditionality, enlargement, European Union, membership Word Count: 7177 1 Introduction On October 12, 2012 in the Norwegian capital of Oslo, Thorbjørn Jagland declared, ‘The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2012 is to be awarded to the European Union. The Union and its forerunners have for over six decades contributed to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe’ (Jagland 2012). In awarding the EU the Nobel Peace Prize, the former prime minister voiced a common view of the organization as well as its predecessors, namely that it has been a major force for the advancement of democracy throughout Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Giugno 2017
    067 ISSN 2284-4740 067 05 giugno 2017 la bêtise IL VELTRONI TRUFFATO “Non voglio fare polemica con il segretario che ho votato alle primarie”. Walter Veltroni, “Corriere della sera”, 2 giugno 2017 LA TRUFFA DI FRANCESCHINI. SE CI SARANNO I NUMERI… “Trovo fuorviante e sbagliata l’equazione sistema tedesco uguale larghe intese. Non è così. Se ci sono i numeri, il Pd si alleerà con le forze più vicine: la sinistra e gli alleati centristi di oggi”. Dario Franceschini, “Repubblica”, 28 maggio 2017 ONOGROCRAZIA ACUTA E SENZA RIMEDIO “Pur di curare mia figlia mi sono affidato a delle maghe, degli stregoni che sono quelli che veramente lucrano sulle teorie no-vax e sono persone che ti fanno pagare 350 euro a visita più 1000 euro per farmaci galenici fabbricati in luoghi oscuri”. Davide Faraone, Sottosegretario Pd alla Salute, “La Gabbia, La7”, 24 maggio 2017 ALTRIMENTI SI DISTURBA IL TRESETTE “In Consiglio dei ministri, non si fa politica” Paolo Gentiloni, Pd, presidente del Consiglio, “La Stampa”, 28 maggio 2017 AHI SERVA STAMPA! GOVERNANCE AUTONOMA, PERCHÉ SCELTA PERSONALMENTE DAL PRESIDENTE DEL CONSIGLIO “Ma l’idea di affidare a una governance autonoma il controllo della tivù pubblica, liberandola dalla morsa dei partiti, godeva invece, almeno sulla carta, di un diffuso consenso. Persino quello, a parole , dei partiti, in testa quello di Renzi”. Michele Serra, L’amaca, “Repubblica 2.0”, 3 giugno 2017 segue a pagina 12 Comitato di presidenza onoraria: Mauro Barberis, Piero Bellini, Daniele Garrone, Sergio Lariccia, Pietro Rescigno, Stefano Rodotà, Gennaro Sasso, Carlo Augusto Viano, Gustavo Zagrebelsky. *Hanno fatto parte del Comitato di Presidenza Onoraria: Norberto Bobbio (Presidente), Vittorio Foa, Alessandro Galante Garrone, Giancarlo Lunati, Italo Mereu, Federico Orlando, Claudio Pavone, Alessandro Pizzorusso, Paolo Sylos Labini.
    [Show full text]
  • HQ Eurocorps
    26th Feb. 2015 Brussels Subcommittee on Security and Defence Lieutenant-general BUCHSENSCHMIDT Commander Eurocorps EUROCORPS, a tool for the European Union, NATO and UN Use it or lose it ! 1 EUROCORPS is an Army Corps Headquarters: Similar to its sister HRF HQs but also Unique in its kind Has reached a turning point in its existence. 2 CENTRAL LOCATION WITHIN HRF COMMUNITY 3 RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE OPERATIONAL NRF 7 NRF 15 A UNIQUE STATUS 1992, La Rochelle : a political will Directly subordinated to CHODs and POL DIR 2009, Treaty of Strasbourg : Financial and legal autonomy A UNIQUE SUBORDINATION Common Committee (CoCo) Auditing Air Committee Eurocorps Committee Committee (AUDITCOM) (ECC) (ACEC) Naval Budget & Coordination Financial Info Info Board Committee (NCB) (BFC) ANs ANs Security Info Committee ANs Expert Groups (ECSC) HQ EC ECSAB Resources Board EC HQ Board A UNIQUE GEOGRAPHICAL SITUATION European Parliament A European capital Council of Europe European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg Higher education center National School of Administration (ENA) University of Strasbourg Institute of Political Studies (IEP) Council of Europe 8 Force structure Total Eurocorps: Permanent XXX +/- 1100 HQ 400 X MN 700 MNCS MN II I I HQSPT Signal CIS MN DEU MN X DEU/FRA FGB Other TCN 5 000 Privileged Force generated Capabilities 9 A UNIQUE MULTINATIONAL STRUCTURE 5 6 Framework Nations Germany Belgium France Luxembourg Spain • Mastered multinationality • Responsibility and burden sharing • Lower cost for each nation 3 Associated Nations AN ENHANCED MULTINATIONALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the European Parliament the Guarantor of the Independence of European Citizens
    SPECIAL COVERAGE 2019 European Elections - lessons to be learnt @ Multimedia Centre EP. Centre Multimedia @ | 3nd July, election of the new President of the European Parliament, David Sassoli in Brussels. MAKING THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE GUARANTOR OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF EUROPEAN CITIZENS by David Maria Sassoli We are in the midst of historic changes: youth unemployment, migration, climate change, the digital revolution, new world balances, which in order to be tackled need new ideas and the courage to know how to combine great wisdom and maximum audacity. But we also need the institutions to take on these challenges, amongst which is the European Parliament. The new President of the European Parliament, David Sassoli argues that in the parliamentary term that is beginning now, the procedures need to be strengthened to make the Parliament the leading player in a full European democracy. Summer-Autumn 2019 - The Progressive Post !12 9 We need to recover the spirit of Ventotene We often think of the world we live in, of the people prospects, relaunch sustainable and the pioneering impulse of the Founding freedoms we enjoy. But let's say it to our- investments and strengthen the process Fathers, who were able to put aside the selves, given that others in the East or West, of convergence between our regions and hostilities of war, and to put an end to the or in the South, find it hard to recognise, that territories. failures of nationalism, giving us a project so many things make us different – not bet- capable of combining peace, democracy, ter, simply different – and that we Europeans The digital revolution is profoundly chang- rights, development and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of European Integration History Revue D
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION HISTORY REVUE D’HISTOIRE DE L’INTÉGRATION EUROPÉENNE ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR GESCHICHTE DER EUROPÄISCHEN INTEGRATION edited by the Groupe de liaison des professeurs d’histoire contemporaine auprès de la Commission européenne 2007, Volume 13, Number 2 The Liaison Committee of Historians came into being in 1982 as a result of an important international symposium that the Commission had organized in Luxembourg to launch historical research on Euro- pean integration. The committee is composed of historians of the European Union member countries who work on contemporary history. The Liaison Committee: – gathers and conveys information about work on European history after the Second World War; – advises the European Union on research projects concerning contemporary European history. Thus, the Liaison Committee was commissioned to make publicly available the archives of the Community institutions; – enables researchers to make better use of the archival sources; – promotes research meetings to get an update of work in progress and to stimulate new research: seven research conferences have been organized and their proceedings published. The Journal of European Integration History – Revue d’histoire de l’intégration européenne – Zeitschrift für Geschichte der europäischen Integration is in line with the preoccupations of the Liaison Committee. Being the first history journal to deal exclusively with the history of European Integration, the Journal offers the increasing number of young historians devoting their research to contemporary Europe, a permanent forum. The Liaison Committee works completely independently and according to historians’ critical method. ❋ Le Groupe de liaison des professeurs d’histoire contemporaine auprès de la Commission des Communautés européennes s’est constitué en 1982 à la suite d’un grand colloque que la Commis- sion avait organisé à Luxembourg pour lancer la recherche historique sur la construction européenne.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 26-03-2020 - 14:58 20200325IPR75812
    Press release 26-03-2020 - 14:58 20200325IPR75812 COVID-19: MEPs call for a more unified EU response • 687 MEPs participated in the first vote of the special plenary to deal with COVID-19 urgency measures • MEPs called for enhanced solidarity among member states to tackle the challenges • Long-term EU measures must mitigate the economic impact and invest more in research MEPs and the Commission’s President discussed how the EU can enhance collaboration among EU countries in the common fight against COVID-19. Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 1 I 4 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume Duch Guillot EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Press release Showing strong support for EU measures to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic, MEPs spoke up for strong EU solidarity to help citizens in Thursday’s plenary debate. Prior to a crucial urgency vote on the first batch of measures proposed by the Commission to help members states tackle the pandemic in an efficient and coordinated way, MEPs called for EU countries to collaborate and to keep internal borders open to allow medical equipment and goods to be delivered. Respecting strict sanitary precautions, lead MEPs from all political groups gathered in a special session in the Brussels chamber on Thursday, with others following the debate from home. Thanks to special procedures put in place, all MEPs were able to cast their votes remotely: 687 MEPs participated in the first vote to approve the urgency procedure. Click on the names to view individual statements by group leaders and the Commission. Opening the debate, President David Sassoli reiterated that the Parliament would not cease to function despite the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Briefs
    Rethinking EU Crisis Management From Battlegroups to a European Legion? Niklas Nováky Summary June 2020 This paper discusses an idea to create a European Legion that has been put forward by Radoslaw Sikorski, MEP. This would be a new kind of EU military unit, made up of volunteers rather than national contingents contributed by the member states. The idea stems from Sikorski’s desire to reform the EU’s existing battlegroups, which have been operational for 15 years but have never been used, despite numerous opportunities. The paper argues that although the EU’s 2007 Lisbon Treaty imposes heavy restrictions on the Union’s ability to deploy military force, it does not rule out conducting operations with a volunteer force. At the same time, a volunteer-based European Legion force would have to be created initially by a group of member states outside the EU framework. These states could then make it available to the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy as, for example, a permanent battlegroup. An existing model would be the multinational Eurocorps. Keywords CSDP – Crisis management – Battlegroups – European Legion – European Council – Eurocorps 1 Introduction Since the EU’s Common (formerly European) Security and Defence Policy (ESDP/CSDP) became operational in 2003, the Union has launched a total of 13 military operations within its framework. Of these, eight have been executive in character, meaning that they were authorised to use force if this had been deemed necessary to fulfil their mandate. The most recent CSDP military operation is Operation IRINI in the Mediterranean, which the EU launched on 31 March 2020 to help enforce the UN’s arms embargo on Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • 11012411.Pdf
    Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna DOTTORATO DI RICERCA Cooperazione Internazionale e Politiche per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile International Cooperation and Sustainable Development Policies Ciclo XX Settore/i scientifico disciplinari di afferenza: Storico, politico e sociale SPS/13 DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE IN ROMANIA: from Socialism to EU Membership Presentata da: Mirela Oprea Coordinatore Dottorato Relatore Prof. Andrea Segrè Prof. Stefano Bianchini Esame finale anno 2009 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With their accession to the European Union, twelve new countries - Romania among them - (re)entered the international community of international donors. In the history of development aid this can be seen as a unique event: it is for the first time in history that such a large number of countries become international donors, with such short notice and in such a particular context that sees some scholars announcing the ‘death’ of development. But in spite of what might be claimed regarding the ‘end’ of the development era, development discourse seems to be rather vigorous and in good health: it is able to extert an undeniable force of attraction over the twelve countries that, in a matter of years, have already convinced themselves of its validity and adhered to its main tenets. This thesis collects evidence for improving our understanding of this process that sees the co-optation of twelve new countries to the dominant theory and practice of development cooperation. The evidence collected seems to show that one of the tools employed by the promoters of this co-optation process is that of constructing the ‘new’ Member States as ‘new’, inexpert donors that need to learn from the ‘old’ ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union
    SYLLABUS OF THE COURSE NAME OF THE COURSE 1. COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FIELD OF SCIENCE 2. POLITICAL SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION LANGUAGE OF TUITION 3. ENGLISH UNIT OFFERING THE COURSE 4. THE CHAIR OF EUROPEAN STUDIES CODE OF THE COURSE 5. 26-ES-S2-E2-CFaSP TYPE OF THE COURSE 6. OBLIGATORY FIELD OF STUDIES (SPECIALISATION) 7. European Studies, (Regional Policy) 8. TYPE OF STUDIES MASTER YEAR OF STUDIES 9. 1 YEAR SEMESTER 10. SPRING MODE OF STUDIES 11. DISCUSSION SESSION 30 HOURS 12. PRELIMINARY REQUIREMENTS The workshop requires students to have basic knowledge of the institutional and legal framework of the European Union, contemporary international relations and political geography. Basic knowledge of the modern history of Europe and its direct neighborhood is recommended. Student should be able to work in teams and to perform critical analysis of a text. AIMS OF THE COURSE: The aim of the course is to learn students about the institutional framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, its mechanisms, programmes, initiatives. The course presents a theoretical approach to security studies and foreign policy as well as the historical development of the CFSP The course discloses several case studies related to the CFSP. Students learn how to evaluate the effectiveness of the CFSP of the EU, its strengths and weaknesses. Students apply various theoretical approaches (i.e. normative power Europe; geopolitics; intergovernmentalism) in critical debate on the 13. CFSP. COURSE CONTENTS 1) Introduction to the course 2) Foreign policy and security policy – theoretical approach; the essence of notion; foreign policy at the level of international organization 3) The European Union as a global actor – unfulfilled promise? What kind of actor? Toward the strategic sovereignty? Normative power Europe.
    [Show full text]