British Gas Announces Significant Changes to Its GB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Gas Announces Significant Changes to Its GB Tom Crisp Editor 01603 604421 [email protected] Monday 20/11 – British Gas announces significant changes to its GB retail business model, including the withdrawal of its Standard Variable ENERGY PERSPECTIVE 02 Tariff for new customers. The Energy Networks Association launches a consultation on its Electricity Network Innovation Strategy. Bloomberg Creating a fairer market – Our New Energy Finance predicts the global energy storage market will fourth annual retail conference double six times between 2016 and 2030. EY says the coming decade POLICY 05 will be “critical” for the UK nuclear supply chain in the UK if it is to increase its capacity to deliver new build. Budget signals moratorium on new renewables spending Tuesday 21/11 – BP agrees to sell a package of its interests in the Energy industry disappointed by Budget Bruce assets in the North Sea to Serica Energy. E3G analysis finds Government made “grave renewables can make up 61% of the EU electricity mix by 2030 – strategic errors” over Hinkley above current targets and at a lower cost. Utility Warehouse confirms Point C: PAC over the half-year to 30 September its revenue rose 2.6% to £299mn, Parliamentary update - Week 47 2017 up from £291mn in 2016. REGULATION 11 Wednesday 22/11 – Chancellor Philip Hammond delivers the Autumn Budget, confirming the government will not introduce any new low- Ofgem initiates Charging carbon electricity levies – outside of existing commitments – until the Futures Forum One in, one out on SSE licence burden of current costs falls at a sustained level. The Public Accounts compliance Committee criticises the negotiation of the Hinkley Point C deal. EU Prescriptive licence condition on member states endorse the provisional deal that had been reached on back-billing to be introduced reform of the EU Emissions Trading System post-2020. Statkraft and INDUSTRY STRUCTURE 16 Statoil’s 402MW Dudgeon offshore windfarm in Great Yarmouth officially opens. British Gas sees huge customer losses but proposes fairer tariffs Thursday 23/11 – Centrica announces that between 30 June and the National Grid reports steady H1 end of October 2017 it GB business lost 823,000 energy supply 2017 performance accounts. The Shetland New Energy Solution proposal put forward by NUTWOOD 20 National Grid and Aggreko is rejected by Ofgem. The regulator also Evolution, not revolution, in GB confirms a £260,000 fine for supplier E over failures relating to its energy retail supply please – agents. Peter Atherton Friday 24/11 – The Environmental Audit Committee announces the MARKETS 22 launch of an inquiry to scrutinise the government’s approach to develop “world leading” Green Finance capabilities. Results from Ofgem’s large-scale randomised control trial suggest increased switching among customers who have been on standard variable tariffs for over three years. The EU’s Third Report on the State of the Energy Union argues that the energy transition is not possible without adapting the infrastructure to the needs of the future energy system. On 22 November we held to the energy system and that, as the scope of the our annual retail energy services market expands, so does the perception conference, this year titled of what engagement truly means. Rather than Fairness and Competition defining fairness specifically, it was perhaps better in the Retail Energy Market. to begin by identifying the principles that underpin fair markets. Now that we are in a world James Cunningham of price caps, the agenda is Miller said that a principles-based, rather than Writer refocussing on showing outcomes-based, approach to fairness will become 01603 959884 energy markets work for all increasingly important in shaping the required J.Cunningham@cornwall- insight.com consumers. But there are regulatory and policy responses to market two other key themes developments. He concluded that the issue of influencing the domestic sector. They are fairness is unlikely to be solved by a single silver technological innovation in companies’ bullet, but will instead require a suite of measures, propositions and services for customers, but also some of which were likely to endure the need to help those customers that cannot and Weights and measures will not engage, especially if they are vulnerable. Rachel Fletcher, Senior Partner at Ofgem, then This Energy Perspective reports on the main argued that there is an issue of social fairness themes and messages from the event. within the energy market. As of April 2017 some Setting out your stall 60% of customers were still on standard tariffs. Cornwall Insight CEO Gareth Miller opened Fletcher suggested that new suppliers will have to proceedings by noting that, as in previous years, increase their market share to survive, and that an the debate about competition in the market will ongoing focus on customer engagement will inevitably touch on the relative balance between support continued innovation. She emphasised the Big Six and Small and Medium Suppliers Ofgem’s recent work on improving engagement (SaMS), various issues of innovation, and political including its trials of a database of disengaged and regulatory interventions. However, he added customers (reflecting a CMA report that the context against which these discussions recommendation), penalties on suppliers for failed are now taking place has shifted dramatically. switches to make them clean data and improve consumer confidence, and putting in more reliable Miller said that the energy market is currently switching arrangements by 2020. Interestingly she going through a period of change more profound also suggested that technological advances could than at any point since price controls lapsed in the increase the likelihood of deeper segmentation early 2000s. He highlighted some of the work within the market. being done by Ofgem to address the issues of vulnerability and fairness, including a consultation Responding to criticisms that the recent comments on the supplier hub model, the implementation of from Ofgem CEO Dermot Nolan on price controls its disengaged customer database, and the were “aggressive”, Fletcher disagreed. Instead a implementation and planned extension of a price responsible regulator should question whether the cap for prepayment and vulnerable customers. structure of the market remains fit for purpose, These initiatives, Miller said, have the potential to adding that market arrangements need to be catalyse enduring change. structured in a way that allows customers to fully benefit from innovation. She gave the example of There have also been some notable changes in peer-to-peer energy trading, which may be being the business models of suppliers. Miller particularly hindered by the requirement to register meters to flagged the recent announcement of the proposed suppliers only for all the energy that flows through merger between the retail businesses of SSE and them at a specific time. npower, which evidenced that the traditional vertical integration model adopted by the largest Self-service players was disintegrating. Sara Vaughan, Strategy and Corporate Affairs Miller suggested that switching is not necessarily Director at E.ON UK, gave a large supplier’s the best metric of showing how customers relate perspective on current changes in the market, 2 emphasising that competition has already led to For example Steve Smith pointed out that the established players taking “radical action” in order switching process in energy is much simpler than to retain customers. She argued that there is a in other sectors, such as banking, but questioned need for regulation in the energy market to protect whether the required will from the industry was vulnerable customers, but that there is less need there to improve and speed up the switching to protect customers who could engage but simply process. He added that simply providing smart choose not to. On price controls Vaughan said that meters won’t make the market fairer, unless the they were an imperfect solution that could data from them is then made available for negatively impact customers, and that to be something useful to be done with it. effective they must still allow room for competition. Dodimead suggested that the potential future Chris Houghton, Managing Director of Retail at benefits of behind the meter technologies, such as OVO Energy, then gave a counter opinion, saying smart heating systems, will outstrip those offered that price caps will benefit the market by by SMETS 2 meters. But Rossiter said there was increasing competition and driving innovation in still a cost barrier to these types of systems. the market. He suggested that the profit pressures It was recognised that new technologies would resulting from a price cap would force companies create a more fragmented market, potentially to become more innovative with their business offering benefits to some consumers and an model to reduce costs. Houghton added that in the awareness that there may be consequences of this energy market there is a need for better fragmentation for all users including those not competition, rather than just more competition. directly affected, which may increase detriment. Pick and mix Village store Anna Moss, Retail Team Leader at Cornwall The afternoon session kicked off with a Insight, introducing a session on innovation and presentation by Pixie Energy Director Nigel smarter markets, began by highlighting the vast Cornwall, who articulated a vision of a new energy range of options available to domestic customers, supply landscape from a local perspective. with 65 active suppliers offering nearly 200 tariffs. Access to these deals is also much easier through Cornwall argued that policy and regulatory change the increasing presence of price comparison sites, has so far failed to keep up with the requirements and these options are now easier to understand. of the local energy supply industry and that it is Collective switches have also helped drive therefore time for some fresh thinking. Cornwall engagement by persuading some disengaged supported a root and branch review of the supplier customers to change supplier.
Recommended publications
  • The Interconnector Pipeline a Key Link in Europe's Gas Network
    The Interconnector Pipeline A Key Link in Europe’s Gas Network Mark Futyan Oxford Institute of Energy Studies March 2006 Mark Futyan is a postgraduate student at Columbia Business School in New York. He previously worked for Interconnector (UK) Limited between 2001 and 2005. During this period, he was involved in a variety of engineering and commercial projects. For information or questions on this research, please contact: [email protected]. Copyright © 2006 Mark Futyan The contents of and views expressed in this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members, nor do they represent the views of Interconnector (UK) Limited. ISBN 1-901795-44-6 ii Preface The Interconnector pipeline has rarely been out of the news since it was first proposed in the early 1990s. It is probably not too much of an exaggeration to say that it has transformed short term trading in north west Europe, causing companies to enter into commercial behaviour that they had not previously considered possible or, in some cases, desirable. Equally interesting were predictions (before it was built) that the project was likely to be a waste of time, followed by periodic claims that: gas was flowing in the wrong direction; that larger or smaller volumes of gas should be flowing; and that shippers on one side or the other were responding inappropriately to price signals. For a gas research programme this made the Interconnector a particularly suitable research project which fits perfectly into our work on European gas issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy: Flexibility Markets & Services from Distributed Energy Resources 1/82
    Monica Giulietti Chloé Le Coq Bert Willems Karim Anaya CERRE 2019 | Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy: Flexibility Markets & Services from Distributed Energy Resources 1/82 The project, within the framework of which this report has been prepared, has received the support and/or input of the following organisations: Enel and Microsoft. As provided for in CERRE's by-laws and in the procedural rules from its “Transparency & Independence Policy”, this report has been prepared in strict academic independence. At all times during the development process, the research’s authors, the Joint Academic Directors and the Director General remain the sole decision-makers concerning all content in the report. The views expressed in this CERRE report are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. In addition, they do not necessarily correspond either to those of CERRE, or to any sponsor or to members of CERRE. © Copyright 2019, Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) [email protected] www.cerre.eu CERRE 2019 | Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy: Flexibility Markets & Services from Distributed Energy Resources 2/84 Table of contents Table of contents .............................................................................................................. 3 Table of Figures ................................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Corporate Responsibility Report Centrica Plc Corporate Responsibility Report 2008
    2008 Corporate responsibility report Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Contents 3 Chief Executive’s introduction 4 Assurance and scope 5 Excerpt from Corporate Citizenship’s Assurance Statement 6 2008 Highlights 7 Business overview 8 Our approach 14 CR Committee and Governance 17 Business principles 22 Key Performance Indicators 25 Key impact areas 26 Climate change and the environment 44 Customer service 56 Securing future energy supplies 64 Health and safety 72 Employees 83 Supply chain 87 Local impact 92 Our stakeholders 94 Customers 97 Investors 99 Employees 101 Suppliers and business partners 103 Governments and regulators 105 Communities 107 NGOs and consumer organisations 109 Media 110 Trade unions 111 Appendix – Memberships 2 Centrica plc Corporate responsibility report 2008 www.centrica.com/cr08 Chief Executive’s introduction Introduction from Sam Laidlaw 2008 was my first full year as a member of the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Throughout the year, the Committee challenged our current performance and debated areas of future activity across a range of critical business issues. Through this continual process of improvement, I have confidence that we are making good progress in developing the necessary structures and processes, allied to a management commitment that will build a sustainable and environmentally aware business for the future. In this report, you can read about our initiatives and performance over the year, as well as our forward- looking plans for 2009 and beyond. As our CR programmes mature, there is an increasing amount of available information to present to our internal and external audiences. As in previous years, we have chosen to use the online environment to report.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies
    The UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Final Report A report to the DTI Renewable Energy Development & Deployment Team June 2003 Imperial College London Centre for Energy Policy and Technology & E4tech Consulting ii Executive summary Background and approach This report considers how innovation systems in the UK work for a range of new and renewable energy technologies. It uses a broad definition of 'innovation' - to include all the stages and activities required to exploit new ideas, develop new and improved products, and deliver them to end users. The study assesses the diversity of influences that affect innovation, and the extent to which they support or inhibit the development and commercialisation of innovative new technologies in the UK. The innovation process for six new and renewable energy sectors is analysed: • Wind (onshore and offshore) • Marine (wave and tidal stream) • Solar PV • Biomass • Hydrogen from renewables • District and micro-CHP In order to understand innovation better, the report takes a systems approach, and a generic model of the innovation system is developed and used to explore each case. The systems approach has its origins in the international literature on innovation. The organising principles are twofold: • The stages of innovation. Innovation proceeds through a series of stages, from basic R&D to commercialisation – but these are interlinked, and there is no necessity for all innovations to go through each and every stage. The stages are defined as follows: Basic and applied R&D includes both ‘blue skies’ science and engineering/application focused research respectively; Demonstration from prototypes to the point where full scale working devices are installed in small numbers; Pre-commercial captures the move from the first few multiples of units to much larger scale installation for the first time; Supported commercial is the stage where technologies are rolled out in large numbers, given generic support measures; Commercial technologies can compete unsupported within the broad regulatory framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy White Paper: Powering Our Net Zero Future
    Introduction ENERGY WHITE PAPER Powering our Net Zero Future December 2020 | CP 337 1 Energy White Paper The Energy White Paper Powering our Net Zero Future Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy by Command of Her Majesty December 2020 CP 337 © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit: nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available on our website at: www.gov.uk/beis Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-2219-6 CCS0220144090 12/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Introduction Contents Foreword 02 Introduction to the Energy White Paper 04 CHAPTER 1 | Consumers 18 CHAPTER 2 | Power 38 BEIS modelling 60 CHAPTER 3 | Energy system 64 Transport 88 CHAPTER 4 | Buildings 96 CHAPTER 5 | Industrial energy 118 CHAPTER 6 | Oil and gas 132 Glossary 148 References 156 Energy White Paper ENERGY WHITE PAPER Ministerial foreword The government presents this white paper at a time of unprecedented Tackling climate change will require peacetime challenge to our country. decisive global action and significant investment and innovation by the public Coronavirus has taken a heavy toll and private sectors, creating whole new on our society and on our economy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the GB Energy B2C Retail Market – 'The Disruption Of
    22nd Edition November 2020 World Energy Markets Observatory A brief history of the GB energy B2C retail market – ‘the disruption of incumbents’ Over the last 15 years, the GB energy retail market has changed significantly. A look back to 2005 shows 12 suppliers, with the ‘Big 6’ incumbent energy retailers – EDF Energy, British Gas, SSE, Scottish Power, npower (RWE) and E.ON having a market share of effectively 100% of the 30 million customers in the UK.1 Only 15 years later, the market in 2020 looks dramatically million in gas.3 Of these, 22% were customers switching away different - with over 50 suppliers, and the market share of the from the six largest suppliers.4 legacy incumbents’ being reduced to circa 70%. Moreover, suppliers previously thought of as “challengers” or “small Not every new entrant or challenger that has entered the suppliers” have made large acquisitions and/or grown market has been successful. In particular, in 2018 we witnessed significantly. The market is now dominated by Ovo Energy, 14 exits from the market, with Ofgem, the energy regulator, EDF, British Gas, Scottish Power and E.ON. needing to use supply of last resort arrangements for over one million customers.5 Further, a series of acquisitions from Figure 1 provides a chronicle (2005 to 2020) of how the market Octopus Energy (including ENGIE, Co-Operative Energy, structure has changed and how the UK energy retail market Affect Energy and Iresa Energy) have seen their customer base has become one of the most competitive in Europe. The increase to over one million in less than five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility 2050 Regulation, Investment and Innovation in a Rapid Energy Transition
    UTILITY 2050 REGULATION, INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION IN A RAPID ENERGY TRANSITION MARCH 2021 UTILITY 2050 - REGULATION, INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION IN A RAPID ENERGY TRANSITION THE UK’S NET-ZERO EMISSIONS BY 2050 TARGET BECAME LAW IN 2019 • WE KNOW THAT ACHIEVING IT WILL REQUIRE FAR-REACHING AND DISRUPTIVE CHANGE ACROSS MANY DIFFERENT SECTORS. • A KEY ELEMENT OF SUCCESS IS A VIRTUALLY CARBON FREE POWER SECTOR. • HOW WILL THIS AFFECT ENERGY UTILITIES? • WHAT NEEDS TO CHANGE FOR A DECARBONISED POWER SECTOR TO THRIVE? 2 UTILITY 2050 - REGULATION, INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION IN A RAPID ENERGY TRANSITION THE UTILITY 2050 PROJECT WAS A PARTNERSHIP OF ENERGY INDUSTRY PROFESSIONALS, FINANCIERS AND ACADEMICS WITH A SHARED OBJECTIVE TO EXPLORE WHAT NET ZERO COULD MEAN FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR. We found that there are growing The energy sector has an ‘innovation dilemma’: pressures in the retail and wholesale It is challenging to plan for and regulate the DECISIONS WITHIN THIS DILEMMA FALL INTO THREE BROAD markets caused by the net-zero energy market even 2-5 years ahead. Equally, CATEGORIES: energy transition. there is a pressing need to make decisions, in the face of deep uncertainties, which are (1) Enabling innovation whilst protecting These need a deeper rethink of the business commensurate with hitting the 2050 consumers in the retail market; models that make up the energy market and net-zero target. the regulation which supports them. (2) Evolving the business model for large generators; and (3) Balancing the contributions of retail Please cite this report as: Author affliations, titles and links and wholesale innovation. Hall, S., Cole, D., Workman, M., Hardy, J., Mazur, C., Anable, J., (2021) Utility 2050 – Regulation, investment and innovation in a rapid energy transition, Atkins, London Available at: .
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwashing Vs. Renewable Energy Generation
    Greenwashing Vs. Renewable energy generation: which energy companies are making a real difference? Tackling the climate crisis requires that we reduce the UK’s carbon footprint. As individuals an important way we can do this is to reduce our energy use. This reduces our carbon footprints. We can also make sure: • All the electricity we use is generated renewably in the UK. • The energy company we give our money to only deals in renewable electricity. • That the company we are with actively supports the development of new additional renewable generation in the UK. 37% of UK electricity now comes from renewable energy, with onshore and offshore wind generation rising by 7% and 20% respectively since 2018. However, we don’t just need to decarbonise 100% of our electricity. If we use electricity for heating and transport, we will need to generate much more electricity – and the less we use, the less we will need to generate. REGOs/GoOs – used to greenwash. This is how it works: • If an energy generator (say a wind or solar farm) generates one megawatt hour of electricity they get a REGO (Renewable Energy Guarantee of Origin). • REGOs are mostly sold separately to the actual energy generated and are extremely cheap – about £1.50 for a typical household’s annual energy use. • This means an energy company can buy a megawatt of non-renewable energy, buy a REGO for one megawatt of renewable energy (which was actually bought by some other company), and then claim their supply is renewable even though they have not supported renewable generation in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Difference Investing in the Communities Where We Live and Work Making a Difference: Investing in the Communities Where We Live and Work
    Making a difference Investing in the communities where we live and work Making a difference: Investing in the communities where we live and work As Britain’s leading supplier of energy and related services, it’s essential we act responsibly in everything we do. Our commitment to doing what’s right in the communities we serve is at the heart of our business. With our resources and nearly 30,000 people, we’re uniquely placed to help tackle some of the challenges that face the 11 million homes we supply with energy and services. For example, almost a third of privately rented homes do not meet the Government’s Decent Homes Standard. Over 4 million UK households are in fuel poverty. And at the same time, the UK is short on the skills needed to power the homes of the future. Many organisations across the country are doing a fantastic job in addressing some of these challenges. This brochure outlines the ways in which we aim to make a difference, through collaborating with some of these expert partners. A helping hand We want to help people who need extra support to keep their homes warm and working. In 2015, we invested £8.5 million in energy grants through the British Gas Energy Trust to help people living in fuel poverty. In 2016 we’re continuing to build on our successful partnership with Shelter. In their 50th anniversary year, we are working together to help shape new standards for homes in the 21st century. Building Britain’s skills The UK is facing a real skills shortage, and youth unemployment remains a challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy in the UK 2018
    13/09/2018 09:45 13/09/2018 1 v2.indd 2018 UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy 2018 Energy in the UK the in Energy The voice of the energy industry energy the of voice The 36355_EUK_Energy in the UK 2018_LR2.job 09/13/2018 09:58:42 1-A $[color] $[color] B - 1 09:58:42 09/13/2018 2018_LR2.job UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy Contents Foreword 4 From the Climate Change Act to 16 The Energy Overview 6 EMR, Transforming UK Generation Employment within Energy 7 - The Climate Change Act Sets the Scene 16 The Heart of the UK Economy 8 - Investment in Renewables 17 People of UK Energy 10 - Renewable Generation across 19 - Skills 12 the UK -Young Energy Professionals (YEP) 13 - Delivering Security of Supply 22 - Equality and Diversity in Energy 14 - Further Steps Away From Coal 23 - Pride in Energy 15 - Air Quality and Environmental 25 Protection 2 3 36355_EUK_Energy in the UK 2018 v2.indd 2 13/09/2018 09:45 $[color] A - 2 09:58:42 09/13/2018 2018_LR2.job UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy Now and Tomorrow, Building the Future 27 A Changing Retail Market 36 for Customers - Engaging with Customers 36 - Integrating Renewable Generation in the 27 - The Smart Meter Revolution 38 System and the Need for Flexibility - Supporting Customers in 39 - Decarbonisation at Customers’ Level 30 Vulnerable Circumstances - Improving Efficiency in Energy 30 - The Challenge of Heat 31 Energy UK Members 42 - Decarbonising UK Transport 32 2 3 36355_EUK_Energy in the UK 2018 v2.indd 3 13/09/2018 09:45 $[color] B - 2 09:58:42 09/13/2018 2018_LR2.job UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy Foreword Last year I wrote about how the energy We will also be feeding into the Five Year system was changing.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTENDING ENERGY COMPANIES Updated on 30 / 10 / 2019 (Sorted by Alphabetical Order of Country)
    12 - 14 November 2019 | Paris, France ATTENDING ENERGY COMPANIES updated on 30 / 10 / 2019 (sorted by alphabetical order of Country) Afghanistan, BAYAT POWER Albania, OSHEE ALBANIA Albania, OST albania Algeria, Sonelgaz Austria, E-Conrol Austria, Energie Graz GMBH Austria, Energie Steiermark Austria, EVN AG Austria, KNG-Kränten Netz GmbH Austria, Netz Niederösterreich GmbH Austria, Wien Energie GmbH Austria, Wiener Netze GmbH Bahrain, Electricity and Water Authority Bahrain, EWA Belgium, Brussels Network Operations Belgium, EDF Luminus Belgium, Elia Asset Belgium, Elia Group Belgium, Elia system Operator Belgium, Enel SpA Belgium, Engie Belgium, Engie Electrabel Belgium, Engie Generation Europe Belgium, Fluvius System Operator CVBA Belgium, i-DE (Iberdrola) Belgium, Luminus Belgium, Ores Belgium, Resa Belgium, Sibelga Belgium, SUEZ Belgium, Veolia Bosnia and Herzegovina, Elektro Doboj Bosnia and Herzegovina, Elektroprivreda of Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina, JP Elektroprivreda BiH Brazil, Centrais Elétricas de Santa Catarina Brazil, Copel Distribuição S.A. Bulgaria, CEZ Electro Bulgaria AD Bulgaria, CEZ ESCO Bulgaria Bulgaria, ESO EAD Bulgaria, EVN Bulgaria, Overgas Mrezhi Cameroon, ENEO Cameroon, KPDC: KRIBI POWER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY SA. Canada, Hydro-Québec Canada, New Brunswick Power (Canada) Canada, Saint John Energy Chile, Empresas Lipigas Chile, Enel Generación CHILE China, Enedis Côte d'Ivoire, CIE( Compagnie Ivoirienne d'Electricité) Côte d'Ivoire, GS2E Croatia, CROATIAN ENERGY MARKET OPERATOR Ltd Croatia, Enedis Croatia, Gradska plinara Zagreb d.o.o. Croatia, HEP - Distirbution System Operator Ltd. Croatia, HEP d.d. Croatia, HEP ELEKTRA d.o.o. Croatia, HEP PLIN d.o.o. Croatia, HEP Trgovina d.o.o. Croatia, HEP-ESCO Ltd. Croatia, HEP-TRGOVINA d.o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Gas Industry in the UK: Providing Pictures
    spective from the gas monopoly years to the fully the evolution of the Gas liberated market today through three lenses of Industry in the uk policy frameworks. It poses the challenges and outlook for the future given the infrastructure and By Calliope Webber price linkages that are currently in play. The rise of the United Kingdom’s gas market and ● The monopoly years: launching British Gas its regional integration within the north-western Originally, gas used in the UK was synthetic gas European gas market over the course of more manufactured from coal (or “town”) gas, and the than a century is a gas market integration success market was run primarily by county councils and story. It is characterised by important energy policy small private firms. After World War II that changes and changing market circumstances both changed with the Gas Act of 1948, which in Europe generally as well as at an intra- nationalised the UK gas industry. When it came regional level. into effect in May 1949, over 1,000 privately The objective of this paper is to use the GMI owned and municipal gas companies were model as a framework to describe the evolution of merged into 12 area Gas Boards – geographically the UK gas market. It provides a descriptive retro- organised and collectively known as British Gas. The world’s first commercial LNG delivery was made from Algeria to the UK by the Methane Princess with the shipment arriving at Canvey Island on October 12, 1964. 198 t h e e V o l u t I on of the G A s Industry I n t h e u k This was the beginning of the publicly owned, Similarly, the electricity supply monopoly was vertically integrated monopoly for the downstream run by the Central Electricity Generating Board supply of gas in the UK.
    [Show full text]