Reporting Period

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reporting Period Reporting Period: 23 May to 5 June 2014 Donor: OFDA/USAID Submission Date: 5 June 2014 Incidents Update: During the reporting period, nine new natural disaster incidents were reported North Region: Sar-e-Pol Province: According to initial information obtained from ANDMA on 26 May, 350 families were reportedly affected by a landslide in Balkhab district on 18 May. Following an initial assessment by the district authorities, an assessment team consisting of SCI, ZOA, WFP, ARCS and ANDMA was mobilized to re-assess the affected area and found 66 houses destroyed and 70 houses damaged in Dahna Halka, Dahna Gaward and Gaward villages. Islamic Relief committed to covering the food needs of all the affected families, but there is still gap in provision of NFIs. Access to the affected villages is a challenge due to the lack of paved road. As such, ANDMA, Provincial Governor (PG) and the district authorities decided to distribute food and NFIs in the more accessible Pay Ziarat area, located between the district center and the affected area. In a separate incident, a flash flood on 30 May reportedly affected Barghali, Adreng, Qalai Sukhta, Laghaman, Alaf Safid, Yarganda, Shahr-e-Gaday, Setoot and Gulnazar villages in Sar- e-Pol city. A joint assessment team consisting of ANDMA, DRRD, the Water Management Department, ZOA and WFP conducted assessments in Barghali and Adreng villages. Sixty three families were found to be affected (23 HH destroyed, 40 HH damaged) in Barghali village and twenty two families were found affected (12 HH destroyed, 10 HH damaged) in Adreng village. Assessment of the remaining villages is ongoing, and a response will be coordinated once the assessments are concluded. Balkh Province: The following districts were affected as the result of flash floods on 30 May: 1. Kishindi District: An unknown number of families were reportedly affected in several villages. A joint assessment team consisting of PIN, WFP, DRRD and ANDMA carried out an assessment on 1 June. The findings of the assessment indicate that 221 families were affected (61 houses destroyed, 160 houses damaged) in 12 villages (Mirzayee, Charkhab, Dehak, Khalifa, Safid Khaak, Andarab, Laark, Lar kochko, Mian dehi, Aqkupruk, Sarab and Lorband). In addition, one person was killed and 17 intakes, three bridges and an estimated 31km of roads in different villages were damaged. The road between the district center and Tunj village was totally destroyed. PIN, UNICEF and SCI will provide NFIs, while WFP will cover food needs by next week. 2. Sholgara District: Following an assessment conducted by ARCS, seventy-five families were found to be affected. CARE and UNICEF committed to providing NFIs, while 1 ANDMA will cover food needs. The committed assistance will be distributed jointly next week. 3. Chemtal District: Following an assessment conducted by ARCS, seventy-six families were found to be affected. CARE and UNICEF committed to providing NFIs, while ANDMA will cover food needs. The committed assistance will be distributed jointly next week. 4. Chahar Bolak District: Following an assessment conducted by ARCS, eighty-six families were found to be affected. CARE and UNICEF committed to providing NFIs, while ANDMA will cover food needs. The committed assistance will be distributed jointly next week. Faryab Province : A landslide incident was reported in Nazir Abad/Kohi Khana village of Maimana district on 29 May. Three families were affected (three houses and HH items completely destroyed). A joint assessment was conducted by IOM, ANDMA and SCI in presence of ANDMA DG on the same day. ANDMA committed to providing 15,000 AFN and food items to each family while SCI will cover their NFI needs. In a separate incident, a result on 30 May affected the districts listed below. According to the district governors and CDC members, more than one thousand families were reportedly affected: 1. Pashtonkot District: According to initial information obtained from ANDMA and district authorities, 1,077 families were reportedly affected, 166 animals killed, numerous acres of agricultural land were washed away, bridges and roads were destroyed and three people were killed in Halwakhor, Sayer, Jijigak, Mirshikar, Kulani, Tokali and Ghalmori villages. A joint assessment team consisting of Islamic Relief, the head of CDC, ARCS and district local authorities was assigned to conduct an assessment and share the findings with PDMC members. Islamic Relief will cover the needs of the affected families once the assessment is concluded. 2. Qaysar District: According to initial information obtained from ANDMA and district authorities, an unknown number of families were reportedly affected, 200 animals killed, acres of agriculture land was damaged, a number of bridges and roads were destroyed and three people were killed in Ghondasank, Korab, Jairaghal, Tashlak, Eity Salok, and Tirailik villages. A joint assessment team consisting of ACTED, ARCS, WFP and district local authorities were assigned to conduct an assessment and share the findings with PDMC members. 3. Belcheragh District: According to initial information obtained from ANDMA and district authorities, an unknown number of families were affected by flooding in Khorchi, Toghlamast, and Charmgary villages. The main road between Maymana and Bilcheragh district is closed for traffic. A joint assessment team consisting of IOM, CHA, SCI, WFP, NRC, ARCS and district local authorities was assigned to conduct an assessment and share the findings with PDMC members. 2 4. Gurziwan District: Two villages (Qorchi, Toghlamast) were reportedly flooded, and a joint assessment team consisting of IOM, CHA, SCI, WFP, NRC, ARCS and district local authorities was assigned to conduct an assessment and share the findings with PDMC members. In addition, 164 families were identified by district authorities and CDC as being affected by recent flooding in Qarayee area, Almar district. The needs of the affected families were referred to ANDMA for their intervention. Qarayee is one of the most insecure areas in Almar district, and access is a challenge for humanitarian organizations. In a separate report, seventy-five families were reportedly displaced by flooding from Astana valley of Shirintagab district and have settled in Chaghatak village of Dawlatabad district. A joint assessment team consisting of IOM, UNHCR, NRC, UNICEF and OCHA was assigned to carry out an assessment and share the findings with PDMC members. Northeast Region: Badakhshan Province: As a result of heavy rainfall and flooding on 31 May and 3 June, the following districts were affected: 1. Kishem District : An unknown number of families were reportedly affected in Khushka Dara, Sare Tangi, Dara-Pasha, Dara Afghanhaa, Saray Gharbee and Farajghani villages. A joint assessment was conducted by IOM, WFP, ARCS and ANDMA on 2 June. The findings of the assessment indicate that there was only limited damage to agriculture land, canals, roads and water points. 2. Tagab District: IOM, WFP, ARCS and ANDMA carried out an assessment in Carasde village, and found that eight families were affected. In addition, two water canals and 100 jeribs of agricultural land were damaged. NFI and food needs have been referred to ANDMA. 3. Faizabad District: As a result of heavy rainfall and flooding in Gul Dara village, three families were affected, one person was killed and one individual sustained injuries. NFI and food needs have been referred to ANDMA and WFP for their intervention. 4. Argo District: As a result of flooding in Dara, Hazaraa Dewana and Nawabad Tagharchak villages, four families were affected, and some agricultural land and one water canal were also damaged. An assessment conducted by IOM, ANDMA and WFP found no need for NFIs and food items. 5. Baharak District: Heavy rainfall and flooding in Payen Shahr village on 3 June moderately affected twenty houses, destroyed one water canal and damaged 200 jeribs of agricultural land. An assessment conducted by IOM, ANDMA and WFP found no need for NFIs and food items. 3 West Region: Ghor Province (UPDATE): According to initial information obtained from ANDMA on 18 May, an unknown number of families were affected by flash floods in Shahrak, Dolaina and Dowlatyar districts. The floods also damaged agricultural land. A joint assessment team consisting of ACF, WFP, ARCS, ANDMA and district authorities was assigned to assess the affected areas in order to verify the needs of the affected families. The assessment findings indicated that 61 families were affected in Shahrak, 30 families in Dolaina and 33 families in Dowlatyar districts. ACF committed to providing NFIs to the affected families, while WFP will cover their food needs. In a separate incident reported by ANDMA, flash floods in Saghar and Tolak districts on 20 May affected an unknown number of families. The flooding also damaged agricultural land and four individuals were reportedly killed. An assessment team consisting of ANDMA and representatives from other agencies was assigned to assess the affected areas. The assessment findings indicate that 40 families were affected in Tolak and 67 families in Saghar districts. IOM committed to providing Family Revitalization Kits to the affected families, while WFP will cover their food needs. Farah Province: According to initial reports from ANDMA on 18 May, flash floods in Shibkoh, Lash wa Joyan, Juain, Posht Rod, Qalakah districts and Farah city affected an unknown number of families and resulted in damage to agricultural land and irrigation canals. An extraordinary PDMC meeting was convened on 18 May to coordinate assessment activities. Three assessment teams, including IOM, were deployed to the affected district on 19 May. The assessment findings indicate that only agricultural lands were affected in the flooded districts, with no damages to houses reported. Herat Province: An unknown number of families were reportedly affected by a flash flood in Chesht Sharif district on 18 May. The flood also damaged agricultural land. An assessment team comprised of ANDMA and WFP was assigned to assess the area and verify the needs of affected families.
Recommended publications
  • Update Conflict Displacement Faryab Province 22 May 2013
    Update conflict displacement Faryab Province 22 May 2013 Background On 22 April, Anti-Government Elements (AGE) launched a major attack in Qaysar district, making Faryab province one of their key targets of the spring offensive. The fighting later spread to Almar district of Faryab province and Ghormach of Badghis Province, displacing approximately 2,500 people. The attack in Qaysar was well organized, involving several hundred AGE fighters. According to Shah Farokh Shah, commander of 300 Afghan local policemen in Khoja Kinti, some of the insurgents were identified as ‘Chechens and Pakistani Taliban’1. The Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) has regained control of the Qaysar police checkpoints. The plan is to place 60 Afghan local policemen (ALPs) at the various checkpoints in the Khoja Kinti area. Quick Response Forces with 40 ALPs have already been posted. ANSF is regaining control in Ghormach district. Similar efforts are made in Almar and Pashtun Kot. Faryab OCCT has decided to replace ALP and ANP, originally coming from Almar district, with staff from other districts. Reportedly the original ALP and ANP forces have sided with the AGE. Security along the Shiberghan - Andkhoy road has improved. The new problem area is the Andkhoy - Maymana road part. 200 highway policemen are being recruited to secure the Maymana - Shibergan highway. According to local media reports the Taliban forces have not been defeated and they are still present in the area. There may be further displacement in view of the coming ANSF operations. Since the start of this operation on 22 April, UNAMA documented 18 civilian casualties in Qaysar district from ground engagements between AGEs and ANSF, IED incidents targeting ANP and targeted killings.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship Between Aid and Security in Afghanistan’S Faryab Province Geert Gompelman ©2010 Feinstein International Center
    JANUARY 2011 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship between Aid and Security in Afghanistan’s Faryab Province Geert Gompelman ©2010 Feinstein International Center. All Rights Reserved. Fair use of this copyrighted material includes its use for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, those who wish to reproduce text and image files from this publication for such uses may do so without the Feinstein International Center’s express permission. However, all commercial use of this material and/or reproduction that alters its meaning or intent, without the express permission of the Feinstein International Center, is prohibited. Feinstein International Center Tufts University 200 Boston Ave., Suite 4800 Medford, MA 02155 USA tel: +1 617.627.3423 fax: +1 617.627.3428 fic.tufts.edu Author Geert Gompelman (MSc.) is a graduate in Development Studies from the Centre for International Development Issues Nijmegen (CIDIN) at Radboud University Nijmegen (Netherlands). He has worked as a development practitioner and research consultant in Afghanistan since 2007. Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank his research colleagues Ahmad Hakeem (“Shajay”) and Kanishka Haya for their assistance and insights as well as companionship in the field. Gratitude is also due to Antonio Giustozzi, Arne Strand, Petter Bauck, and Hans Dieset for their substantive comments and suggestions on a draft version. The author is indebted to Mervyn Patterson for his significant contribution to the historical and background sections. Thanks go to Joyce Maxwell for her editorial guidance and for helping to clarify unclear passages and to Bridget Snow for her efficient and patient work on the production of the final document.
    [Show full text]
  • ERM Household Assessment Report
    ERM Household Assessment Report Assessment Location: Dashti Qala, khwaja Ghar, Taloqan districts of Takhar province. Type of crises: Conflict Darayem Kesham,districts of Badakhshan, khwaja Ghar, Dashti Qala, Namak Crisis Location: Aab,districts of Takhar, Qaysar district of Faryab province. Assessment Team: ACTED, DACAAR,IDS/WFP, SFL, ME, DoRR Crisis date: Month of January 2019 to February 2019. Date of Notification: 13.02.2019-and 07.March.2019 Date of Assessment: 03. March. 2019 to03. April.2019 HHs: Families: Individuals: Affected Population: 214 214 1277 1. Brief assessment’s findings and planned response. ALERT AND ASSESSMENT Cause of displacement: military operation conducted by ANSF/ by supporting airstrikes against to AOGs in, all villages of Dashti Qala, district of Takhar province, and also the AOGs attacked to the position of ANP in khwaja Ghar district caused the families displaced to secure villages of khwaja Ghar district and Taloqan district, the number of families displaced from Darayem and keshem districts of Badakhshan to Taloqan and some families displaced from Qaysar district of Faryab to Taloqan district, and displaced the high number of IDPs families to secure village of Dashti Qala district, Rustaq and Taloqan. Displacement data: Month of January and February 2019 from conflict areas to all secured villages of Dashti Qala district, khwaja Ghar district, Taloqan district of Takhar province. Number of households assessed: 980 Number of households eligible under ERM assistance: 214. COORDINATED RESPONSE: Food – WFP will provide two-month food ration in-kind to all 214 households NFIs– UNHCR will provide the NFIs kit for 214-households. Shelter– ACTED under ERM project will distribute 2,000 AFN per HH for all 204- families in this caseload and 10 families will not receive cash and will receive assistance from other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Badghis Province
    AFGHANISTAN Badghis Province District Atlas April 2014 Disclaimers: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. http://afg.humanitarianresponse.info [email protected] AFGHANISTAN: Badghis Province Reference Map 63°0'0"E 63°30'0"E 64°0'0"E 64°30'0"E 65°0'0"E Legend ^! Capital Shirintagab !! Provincial Center District ! District Center Khwajasabzposh Administrative Boundaries TURKMENISTAN ! International Khwajasabzposh Province Takhta Almar District 36°0'0"N 36°0'0"N Bazar District Distirict Maymana Transportation p !! ! Primary Road Pashtunkot Secondary Road ! Ghormach Almar o Airport District p Airfield River/Stream ! Ghormach Qaysar River/Lake ! Qaysar District Pashtunkot District ! Balamurghab Garziwan District Bala 35°30'0"N 35°30'0"N Murghab District Kohestan ! Fa r y ab Kohestan Date Printed: 30 March 2014 08:40 AM Province District Data Source(s): AGCHO, CSO, AIMS, MISTI Schools - Ministry of Education ° Health Facilities - Ministry of Health Muqur Charsadra Badghis District District Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS-84 Province Abkamari 0 20 40Kms ! ! ! Jawand Muqur Disclaimers: Ab Kamari Jawand The designations employed and the presentation of material !! District p 35°0'0"N 35°0'0"N Qala-e-Naw District on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, Qala-i-Naw Qadis city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation District District of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Flash Floods Update No
    Afghanistan: Flash Floods Update No. 8 (as of 2 April 2019) SITUATION OVERVIEW • Heavy rains caused flash flooding on 27, 28 and 29 March in six provinces - Faryab, Balkh, Jawzjan, and Sar-e-Pul province in the North- ern Region, and Hirat and Badghis in the Western Region. While assessments are on- going, an estimated 17,000 people have been affected with Balkh and Hirat suffering the worst impacts. These are the first major floods in the Northern Region in the season. • In Balkh, unconfirmed reports suggest several fatalities in Chemtal district, with up to 645 families (4,515 people) affected throughout the Province. • In Hirat Province, assessments are ongoing, however the Ministry of Health has reported that eight people died and nine were injured in six districts following flash flooding, while more than 1,000 families may have been affected. • This new flooding adds to the impact of the overall flood emergency, with Farah and Kandahar the most effected to date. Since the beginning of 2019, more than 163,000 people have now been af- fected by floods, including those in the past week. A total of more than 42,000 people have been dis- placed. • Due to the above-average snow and rainfall throughout the winter, the conditions for more flooding through the spring remain a concern and humanitarian organizations are planning to ensure they have enough supplies for the remainder of the season. HUMANITARIAN NEEDS AND RESPONSE Northern Region Balkh Afghan Red Crescent Society (ARCS) assessment teams have so far identified 187 families in need (49 houses completely destroyed & 138 severely damaged) in Mazar-e-Sharif, while 161 families in Solara and 297 families in Chemtal districts have been assessed as affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Origin Report Afghanistan
    Country of Origin Report Afghanistan March 2019 Page 1 of 124 Country of Origin Report Afghanistan| March 2019 Publication details The Hague Text by: Department for Country of Origin Information Reports (CAB) Disclaimer: The Dutch version of this report is leading. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands cannot be held accountable for misinterpretations based on the English version of the report. Page 2 of 124 Country of Origin Report Afghanistan| March 2019 Table of contents Publication details ............................................................................................2 Table of contents .............................................................................................3 Introduction ....................................................................................................5 1 Country information .................................................................................... 7 1.1 Political developments ......................................................................................7 1.1.1 Government of National Unity ...........................................................................7 1.1.2 Elections ........................................................................................................8 1.1.3 Corruption in government ............................................................................... 16 1.2 High Peace Council (HPC) ............................................................................... 17 1.2.1 Peace talks with the Taliban ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict-Induced Internal Displacement—Monthly Update
    CONFLICT-INDUCED INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT—MONTHLY UPDATE UNHCR AFGHANISTAN DECEMBER 2012 HIGHLIGHTS IDPs (Internally Displaced Total Increase Decrease Overall change Total displaced as at Total recorded Persons) are persons or 30 November 2012 December 2012 December 2012 December 2012 31 December 2012 in 2012 groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or leave their homes or 481,877 4,450 29 4,421 486,298 203,457 places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to, avoid the effects • IDPs overall: As at 31 December, 486,298 persons (76,335 families) are internally dis- of armed conflict, situations placed due to conflict in Afghanistan. of generalized violence, • violations of human rights or December 2012 : 4,450 individuals (830 families) have been newly recorded as displaced natural or human-made due to conflict of whom 180 individuals (4%) were displaced in December, while 587 indi- disasters, and who have not viduals (13%) were displaced in November and 341 individuals (8%) were displaced in crossed an internationally recognized State border ( UN October 2012. The remaining 3,342 individuals (75%) were displaced prior to October Secretary General, Guiding 2012. Principles on Internal Dis- • Overall in 2012 : Since January 2012, a total of 203,457 conflict-induced IDPs have been placement, E/CN.4/1998/53/ Add.2, 11 February 1998). recorded in Afghanistan. This figure includes 94,299 conflict-induced IDPs (46%) who were displaced in 2012 whereas 109,158 (54%) individuals were displaced prior to 2012. DISPLACEMENT TRENDS BY REGION No new displacement was recorded in the South and Central regions as well as Region end-Nov 2012 Increase Decrease end-Dec 2012 in the Central Highlands.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN North-East
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (31 August – 6 September 2020) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2020 (AS OF 6 SEPTEMBER) 151,190 People displaced by conflict 98,320 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2020 (AS OF 6 SEPTEMBER) 46,110 Number of people affected by natural disasters UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Conflict incident IN 2020 (AS OF 29 AUGUST) Internal displacement 486,050 Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 2,090 Returnees from Pakistan 3,190 Returnees from other countries North-east: 78,610 people displaced by conflict HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Fighting between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state armed PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & group (NSAG) continued across the north-east. According to initial reports, 11 FUNDING civilians died and 32 others were wounded by recent fighting in Kunduz province. The ongoing fighting in Imam Sahib district reportedly displaced more 1,580 1.13B families (about 11,060 people) from Alchin, Talawka and Mullah-Sardar villages Requirements (US$) – HRP to the district administrative centre in Kunduz province. To date, the recent 2020 fighting in Kunduz resulted in the displacement of estimated 10,730 families 334.3M (approximately 75,110 people). In Takhar province, fighting also reportedly displaced 500 families (3,500 people) from Nahr-e-Ab area of Farkhar district to 30% funded (US$) in 2020 Taloqan city. AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN FUND (AHF) 2020 During the reporting period, interagency assessment teams identified 1,977 families (approximately 13,839 people) displaced by conflict to receive 41.53M humanitarian assistance in Badakhshan, Baghlan, Kunduz and Takhar provinces. Contributions (US$) Humanitarian assistance reached 19,215 people affected by the conflict in Kunduz and Takhar provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Northeast: Over 17000
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (16 December – 22 December 2019) KEY FIGURES IDPS IN 2019 (AS OF 22 DEC) 422,600 People displaced by conflict 413,300 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTER IN 2019 (AS OF 1 DEC) 295,900 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident RETURNEES IN 2019 (AS OF 19 DEC) 461,700 Internal displacement Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 25,400 Returnees from Pakistan 25,600 (AS OF 20 NOV) Returnees from other countries Northeast: Over 17,000 people received HRP REQUIREMENTS & FUNDING humanitarian assistance 612M Requested (US$) Fighting between the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a Non- State Armed Group (NSAG) continued in Kunduz province. An NSAG 455M allegedly prevented the movement of civilians on the main roads linking 74% funded (US$) Kunduz to Baghlan and Takhar roads and reportedly killed one civilian in the Omar Khel area of Aliabad district in Kunduz province on 19 December. AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN FUND (AHF) Across the region, 17,353 people received humanitarian assistance. Moreover, 1,162 internally displaced people (IDPs) who were affected by 95.79M conflict were assessed and will receive assistance in the coming days in Contributions including carry-over Baghlan, Takhar and Kunduz provinces. (US$) 70.16M East: 10,521 people received humanitarian aid Expenditure (US$) Fighting and military operations continued in various districts in Nangarhar, 25.63M Kunar and Laghman provinces. Last week, interagency assessment teams Available for allocation (US$) identified 2,446 IDPs across eastern region as being in need of life-saving humanitarian assistance and will receive support in the coming days.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Engagement with the Taliban in Afghanistan
    Talking to the other side Humanitarian engagement with the Taliban in Afghanistan Ashley Jackson and Antonio Giustozzi HPG Working Paper December 2012 About the authors Ashley Jackson is a Research Fellow with the Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG). Antonio Giustozzi is Visiting Professor in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. Acknowledgements Sara Pantuliano, Eva Svoboda, Alex Strick van Linschoten and Matthew Foley provided helpful inputs and guidance. Due to the sensitive nature of this research, the authors would like to thank many other individuals who assisted in this endeavour but who prefer to remain nameless. Finally, the authors would like to thank the men and women who gave their time to be interviewed and share their experiences. Humanitarian Policy Group Overseas Development Institute 203 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NJ United Kingdom Tel. +44 (0) 20 7922 0300 Fax. +44 (0) 20 7922 0399 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.odi.org.uk/hpg ISBN: 978 1 909464 01 8 © Overseas Development Institute, 2012 Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce materials from this publication but, as copyright holders, ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. This and other HPG Reports are available from www.odi.org.uk/hpg. Contents Executve summary iii Chapter 1 Introducton 1 1.1 Overview of the project 1 1.2 Methodology 1 1.3 Terminology and definitions 2 Chapter 2 Ad agency access n Afghanstan 3 Chapter 3 Ad agency perspectves on engagement wth the Talban 5 3.1 Community acceptance approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict: 2020
    AFGHANISTAN MIDYEAR REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 AFGHANISTAN PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT MIDYEAR REPORT: 1 JANUARY—30 JUNE 2020 UNITED NATIONS ASSISTANCE MISSION IN AFGHANISTAN JULY 2020 1 AFGHANISTAN MIDYEAR REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW 3 II. EID AL-FITR CEASEFIRE (24-26 MAY 2020) 6 III. ANTI-GOVERNMENT ELEMENTS 8 Spotlight: IED attack against an Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission vehicle on 27 June 2020, killing two staff members 11 Spotlight: Public execution of two men by the Taliban in Faryab province on 26 June 2020 13 IV. PRO-GOVERNMENT FORCES 14 Spotlight: Afghan National Army mortar attack in response to Taliban fire in Helmand province on 29 June 2020 15 V. INCIDENTS AFFECTING HEALTHCARE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC 18 VI. RECRUITMENT AND USE OF CHILDREN 20 VII. IMPACT OF THE ARMED CONFLICT ON VICTIMS AND RELATIVES 22 Impact of the armed conflict on the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights 23 Efforts by the parties to the conflict to address harm caused 27 VIII. METHODOLOGY 28 IX. ENDNOTES 29 Photo on Front Cover: © Jawad Jalali 2 AFGHANISTAN MIDYEAR REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 I. OVERVIEW rom 1 January to 30 June 2020, UNAMA tributed to the Taliban and the Afghan national se- documented 3,458 civilian casualties curity forces. (1,282 killed and 2,176 injured). Despite periods of reductions in violence, includ- UNAMA reiterates that ultimately, the best way to Fing during the week leading up to the signing of the protect civilians is to stop the fighting through a 29 February US-Taliban agreement and the cease- negotiated political settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 October 2010
    SIOC – Afghanistan: UNITED NATIONS CONFIDENTIAL UN Department of Safety and Security, Afghanistan Security Situation Report, Week 40 1 – 7 October 2010 JOINT SECURITY ANALYSIS The number of security incidents remained consistent with the previous weeks, though there were regional variations. The NR and SR recorded decreases while the SER and CR recorded increases. The types of incidents recorded also returned to their normal distribution with armed clashes and IED incidents accounting for two thirds of all reports, and stand-off attacks increased slightly to average levels after last week’s lull. The geographical focus of security incidents remains the SR, SER, and ER with notable activity also recorded in Kunduz, Baghlan, Faryab and Wardak as security force operations continue countrywide. Two incidents affected UN staff members, while three additional incidents affected the aid community. In Kandahar city a UN national staff member was warned to quit his job or face dire consequences. Additionally, a UN national staff member previously abducted has again been threatened by his captors. An INGO compound was attacked in Badakhshan, though no casualties or damage was reported. Additionally, a convoy of a demining NGO (UN implementing partner) was ambushed in Samangan: One staff member was killed and three were injured. Four national employees of an INGO en route to Chaghcharan were abducted by a group of armed men. The abductees were released shortly after when community elders intervened. The continued abduction of aid workers while usually resolved quickly and peacefully and continues to negatively impact programme delivery in many areas of the country and particularly in the northern areas.
    [Show full text]