DOCSLIB.ORG

COAL: Affordable, Reliable and Essential by Ellsworth Dickson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COAL: Affordable, Reliable and Essential by Ellsworth Dickson For economic and practical reasons, coal will be with us for the indefinite future COAL: affordable, reliable and essential by Ellsworth Dickson Trial mining and coal processing operations at the Fortune Minerals Mount Klappan Coal Project in northern British Columbia. Photo courtesy Fortune Minerals Ltd. COAL HAS BEEN USED for cooking and over two centuries at our current rate of of the rank scale and is the most valuable. heating for over 4,000 years and still plays consumption. Anthracite is found almost exclusively in an indispensible role in many countries Coal is the altered remains of ancient veg- northern British Columbia and Yukon. where it is the only realistic fuel or energy etation that accumulated in peat bogs and While coal has been criticized from an option. This is because coal, the most swamps. Called the first coal age, the for- environmental standpoint, carbon capture abundant and economical fossil fuel on mation of coal began in the Carboniferous and storage may provide the potential to earth, is found in at least 70 countries. Coal Period 360-290 million years ago. Over the reduce carbon dioxide emissions from coal currently provides over 23% of global millions of years, the effects of pressure use to almost zero. Below are summaries of primary energy requirements. It gener- and temperature transformed this organic various coal projects. ates about 39% of the world’s electricity substance into the various grades of coal. and nearly 70% of global steel production The type or classification of coal is known CanAm Coal Corp. [COE-TSXV] is a coal depends on coal. Coal-fired plants are the as its rank, which depends on the degree producing and development company. most important sources of fossil-fuel gen- of change the peat underwent. Low rank CanAm has completed two acquisitions erated electricity in Canada. In addition, coals, such as lignite and sub-bituminous during the past year: gaining control of Canada exports over 28 million tonnes of coals are soft with a low energy content. RAC Mining LLC, a predominantly metal- coal annually to over 20 countries. Higher rank coals such as bituminous and lurgical coal producer, and acquiring a Worldwide, proven reserves of coal are anthracite contain more carbon and pro- 50% ownership stake in Birmingham Coal over 1 trillion tonnes – enough to last for duce more energy. Anthracite is at the top & Coke Inc., a predominantly thermal coal 50 www.resourceworld.com SEPTEMBER 2011 producer. The company now has an own- exploration leases located within the Hinton which hosts an indicated resource of 29.5 ership stake in four producing coal mines, region of Alberta. The company’s flagship million tons. The company also added 9.04 one development mine, permits and leases project is the Vista Coal Project which has million tons of indicated coal resources at covering about 5,000 acres, and over 110 the potential to be one of the largest export its Winner property. employees. Development assets include thermal coal mines in North America. The EastCoal Inc. [ECX-TSXV], through its exclusive rights to a proprietary coal-to- Vista Coal Project contains over 20 km of subsidiaries, Ukraine Energy and EastCoal liquids technology, which converts coal continuous, gently-dipping, strike length Company, owns the Verticalnaya Coal into liquid fuels; the Buick Coal Project and a measured and indicated resource base Mine located in southeast Ukraine which has significant coal resources. Operations of over 985 million tonnes of low sulphur, it plans to re-open on a significantly and assets are in Alabama and Colorado. high volatile bituminous, export quality expanded basis. Following the start of Cardero Resource Corp. [CDU-TSX] thermal coal. A recently completed pre-fea- de-watering the lower levels of the main has a 75% interest in the Carbon Creek sibility study defined an initial marketable Verticalnaya shaft mine, the company is Coal Project, an advanced-stage metal- reserve of over 260 million tonnes. now rehabilitating some 120 metres of lurgical coal development project in the Colonial Coal International Corp. previously flooded roadways. EastCoal is Peace River Coal Field, northeast British [CAD-TSXV] is a Vancouver, BC-based min- also planning to mine a bulk sample from Columbia. The project has NI 43-101 com- ing development company specializing in the H8 seam, to be carried out whenever pliant measured and indicated resources metallurgical coal. The company currently de-watering and rehabilitation permits. A of 114 million tonnes with an additional has 100% interests in two resource-stage 400 tonnes-per-hour barrel washer plant is 89 million tonnes inferred. This summer’s coal properties in the Peace River Coal being constructed in England for installa- drilling is designed to increase the mea- Field in northeast British Columbia. tion by the first quarter of 2012. This will sured component of the resource, leading Compliance Energy Corp. [CEC-TSXV] process the coal to be produced from the to a new resource estimate and preliminary has coal interests in British Columbia. H11 seam until a central processing plant, economic assessment in late 2011. Through the Comox Joint Venture, the com- servicing both the H11 and H8 seams is Cline Mining Corp. [CMK-TSX] recently pany owns 60% of the Raven Underground installed in 2014. shipped its first commercial sale of metal- Coal Project and is the manager and operator Fortune Minerals Ltd. [FT-TSXV] is lurgical grade coking coal from its coal of the joint venture. The semi-soft, cok- focused on the development of its Mount mine located near the town of Trinidad in ing coal resource is NI 43-101 compliant Klappen anthracite metallurgical coal southern Colorado. The coal was transferred and consists of 72 million tonnes of mea- project in northwest British Columbia to into rail cars from the company’s newly sured and indicated resources, as well as, production. The recently announced joint constructed bulk rail load-out facility at 59 million tonnes of inferred resources. The venture agreement between its wholly- Jansen Yard, near Trinidad. A coal market- Raven Project is 82 km from a deep water owned subsidiary, Fortune Coal Ltd., and ing program is in full effect to establish and ocean port, and is a near term producer POSCO Canada Ltd. and its wholly-owned settle long term customer relationships. favourably located near power and transpor- subsidiary, POSCO Klappan Coal Ltd., to Bulk samples of the product coal are being tation corridors. Compliance has received an advance the Mount Klappan coal project produced and distributed to the major exploration permit from the Government of to production, has now closed. POSCAN’s national and international steel industry BC’s Ministry of Energy and Mines for the parent company, POSCO is based in South participants. Cline also owns the Lossan its New Island Copper Project 10 km south- Korea and is one of the world’s premier Coal Mine Project in northeastern British west of Port Alice, BC. steel producers. Columbia. Lossan coal is metallurgical (steel Corsa Coal Corp. [CSO-TSXV] has com- Mount Klappan hosts 2.8 billion tonnes making) coal with two grades – coking and menced mining operations at its Casselman of high rank anthracite coal, making this pulverized coal injection. An independent underground mine in Pennsylvania, its first one of the largest undeveloped deposits NI 43-101 report shows an in-place raw coal underground operation. The Casselman of metallurgical coal in the world. About resource of 239.6 million tonnes. Lossan is Mine has an indicated resource of 16.3 $86 million was spent to develop this asset, near rail service to year round Ridley Island million tons of coal. The first truckloads including $65 million by Gulf Canada Pacific international tide-water coal terminal of coal from the mine have been shipped Resources before being taken over by at Prince Rupert, BC. to, and successfully processed at the com- ConocoPhillips. A positive definitive feasi- Coalspur Mines Ltd. [CPT-TSX; CPL- pany’s coal preparation plant in Somerset bility study has been completed, and over ASX] is a coal exploration and development County, Pennsylvania. Corsa recently 200,000 tonnes of coal was test mined from company with over 33,200 hectares of coal purchased the Alumbaugh coal property the Lost Fox and Hobbit Broatch deposits SEPTEMBER 2011 www.resourceworld.com 51 for pilot plant processing and trial cargos Natal province of South Africa. mately 20 km north of the Baitag Chinese of 100,000 tonnes of finished coal prod- Goldsource Mines Inc. [GXS-TSXV; border and 3 km west of the Olonbulag ucts to customers in North America, Asia G5M-FWB] has discovered one of Canada’s coal deposits. In addition, Lucky Strike has and Europe. The project is in the environ- most promising new coal deposits in eastern planned a 1,500-metre, due diligence drill- mental assessment process to develop a 3 Saskatchewan and, to date, has outlined coal ing program on the CN coal properties in million tonne-per-year mine and process resources of more than 170 million tonnes of Mongolia with camp setup and mobiliza- plant and a new road to the highway and good quality, sub- bituminous thermal coal. tion of equipment under way since August the port of Stewart, BC. The summer drill program, at its 100%- 10. Lucky Strike signed definitive agree- EmberClear Corp. [EMB-TSXV], in owned Border Project near Hudson Bay, ments to acquire an 80% interest in the CN addition to acquiring coal projects, is also Saskatchewan is designed to test several coal properties, subject to the completion developing the Good Spring Integrated geophysical anomalies for potential expan- of legal and technical due diligence and Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) facilities sion of coal resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 278 Subpart B—Coal Preparation Plants and Coal Preparation Plant
    § 434.20 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) treat coal rine drainage, coal prepara- ration plants and coal preparation tion plant process wastewater, or plant association areas, as indicated, drainage from coal preparation plant including discharges which are associated areas, which remove pollut- pumped, siphoned, or drained from the ants regulated by this part from such coal preparation plant water circuit waters. This includes all pipes, chan- and coal storage, refuse storage, and nels, ponds, basins, tanks and all other ancillary areas related to the cleaning equipment serving such structures. or beneficiation of coal of any rank in- (p) The term ‘‘coal refuse disposal cluding, but not limited to, bitu- pile’’ means any coal refuse deposited minous, lignite, and anthracite. on the earth and intended as perma- nent dispoal or long-term storage § 434.21 [Reserved] (greater than 180 days) of such mate- rial, but does not include coal refuse § 434.22 Effluent limitation guidelines deposited within the active mining representing the degree of effluent area or coal refuse never removed from reduction attainable by the applica- tion of the best practicable control the active mining area. technology currently available (q) The term ‘‘controlled surface (BPT). mine drainage’’ means any surface mine drainage that is pumped or si- (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR phoned from the active mining area. 125.30–125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61, (r) The term ‘‘abandoned mine’’ 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the fol- means a mine where mining operations
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Water Quality on Coal Thermoplasticity Feng Zhang
    Effect of water quality on coal thermoplasticity Feng Zhang A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Engineering School of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering Faculty of Engineering June 2018 II III Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Associate Professor Seher Ata and Dr. Ghislain Bournival for their support, guidance and encouragement throughout my research study. I am especially grateful to Seher, who was the supervisor of my undergraduate thesis, for trusting my ability to complete this research degree. Special thanks to Professor Alan Buckley for his help with my understanding on coal surface chemistry and surface analysis. Also, many thanks to Mr. Noel Lambert, for providing valuable information related to this research topic, as well as preparing and transporting the coal and process water samples. I appreciate Dr. Bin Gong, Dr. Yin Yao for their help with the XPS analysis and SEM analysis. I would like to thank Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) for funding this research project and providing the coal and process water samples. Lastly, thanks to my family and friends, especially to my girlfriend, Hongni Yin, for their endless support throughout these two years. IV Abstract Process water reuse is a common practice in Australian coal preparation plants. It is an effective solution to on-site water scarcity and to minimize environmental impacts. This study investigates the effect of inorganic mineral salts in the process water on the thermoplastic properties of metallurgical coals after a short period of mild oxidation. Two different Australian metallurgical coals were treated with the process water received from a coal preparation plant based in Queensland, AU, and exposed to air at ambient temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump
    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INERTINITE-RICH LUMP COALS. Nandi Malumbazo A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philoso- phy in the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering at the University of the Witwatersrand. Johannesburg, 2011 DECLARATION I, Nandi Malumbazo, declare that the thesis entitled: “CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INER- TINITE-RICH LUMP COALS” is my own work and that all sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and ac- knowledged by means of references. Signature: ……………………………………………………………….. Date:………………………………………………………………………… Page i ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Two Highveld inertinite-rich lump coals were utilized as feed coal samples in order to study their physical, chemical structural and petrographic variations during heat treat- ment in a packed-bed reactor unit combustor. The two feed lump coals were selected as it is claimed that Coal B converts at a slower rate in a commercial coal conversion process when compared to Coal A. The reason for this requires detailed investigation. Chemical structural variations were determined by proximate and coal char CO2 reactiv- ity analysis. Physical structural variations were determined by FTIR, BET adsorption methods, XRD and 13C Solid state NMR analysis. Carbon particle type analysis was con- ducted to determine the petrographic constituents of the reactor generated samples, their maceral associations (microlithotype), and char morphology. This analysis was undertaken with the intention of tracking the carbon conversion and char formation and consumption behaviour of the two coal samples within the reactor. Proximate analysis revealed that Coal A released 10 % more of its volatile matter through the reactor compared to Coal B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dirty Secrets of Coal Cleaning: Pollution and Enforcement Options At
    The Dirty Secrets of Coal Cleaning: Pollution and Enforcement Options at Pennsylvania Coal Preparation Plants October 14, 2014 The Environmental Integrity Project • Lisa Widawsky Hallowell Grant funding was made possible through the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds (FPW), and is intended to support Clear Water Conservancy’s work in advancing the quality of our environment. FPW is a nonprofit, grant-making organization supporting water quality needs throughout Pennsylvania. Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 2 II. OVERVIEW OF COAL PREP PLANT PERMITS ............................................................... 4 III. ANALYSIS: WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................. 5 A. Summary of Laws Related to Releases to Water and Land ............................................. 6 1. The Clean Water Act .................................................................................................... 6 2. Other Laws Requiring Disclosure of Chemicals and Releases .................................... 9 B. Storage of Large Volumes of Chemicals at Coal Preparation Plants ............................. 10 C. Incomplete Permit Applications that Fail to Disclose Metals and other Coal Pollutants in Permit Applications .............................................................................................................. 12 D. No Limits for Metals or Coal Cleaning Pollutants Commonly
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Abstract Booklet
    TWENTY - FIFTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL PITTSBURGH COAL CONFERENCE COAL - ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACTS BOOKLET September 29 - October 2, 2008 The Westin Convention Center Pittsburgh, PA USA The Westin Hotel and Convention Center Hosted By: University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering A NOTE TO THE READER This Abstracts Booklet is prepared solely as a convenient reference for the Conference participants. Abstracts are arranged in a numerical order of the oral and poster sessions as published in the Final Conference Program. In order to facilitate the task for the reader to locate a specific abstract in a given session, each paper is given two numbers: the first designates the session number and the second represents the paper number in that session. For example, Paper No. 25-1 is the first paper to be presented in the Oral Session #25. Similarly, Paper No. P3-1 is the first paper to appear in the Poster Session #3. It should be cautioned that this Abstracts Booklet is prepared based on the original abstract that was submitted, unless the author noted an abstract change. The contents of the Booklet do not reflect late changes made by the authors for their presentations at the Conference. The reader should consult the Final Conference Program for any such changes. Furthermore, updated and detailed full manuscripts are published in the CD-ROM Conference Proceedings will be sent to all registered participants following the Conference. On behalf of the Twenty-Fifth Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, we wish to express our sincere appreciation to Ms. Heidi M. Aufdenkamp, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Development of Dry Coking/Coal
    Development of Coking/Coal Gasification Concept to Use Indiana Coal for the Production of Metallurgical Coke, Liquid Transportation Fuels, Fertilizer, and Bulk Electric Power Phase II Final Report September 30, 2007 Submitted by Robert Kramer, Ph.D. Director, Energy Efficiency and Reliability Center Purdue University Calumet Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ………………………………………………..…………… 3 List of Figures …………………………………………………………………… 5 List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………. 6 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 7 Process Description ……………………………………………………………. 11 Importance to Indiana Coal Use ……………………………………………… 36 Relevance to Previous Studies ………………………………………………. 40 Policy, Scientific and Technical Barriers …………………………………….. 49 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………. 50 Appendix ………………………………………………………………………… 52 2 Executive Summary Coke is a solid carbon fuel and carbon source produced from coal that is used to melt and reduce iron ore. Although coke is an absolutely essential part of iron making and foundry processes, currently there is a shortfall of 5.5 million tons of coke per year in the United States. The shortfall has resulted in increased imports and drastic increases in coke prices and market volatility. For example, coke delivered FOB to a Chinese port in January 2004 was priced at $60/ton, but rose to $420/ton in March 2004 and in September 2004 was $220/ton. This makes clear the likelihood that prices will remain high. This effort that is the subject of this report has considered the suitability of and potential processes for using Indiana coal for the production of coke in a mine mouth or local coking/gasification-liquefaction process. Such processes involve multiple value streams that reduce technical and economic risk. Initial results indicate that it is possible to use blended coal with up to 40% Indiana coal in a non recovery coke oven to produce pyrolysis gas that can be selectively extracted and used for various purposes including the production of electricity and liquid transportation fuels and possibly fertilizer and hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • COAL CONFERENCE University of Pittsburgh · Swanson School of Engineering ABSTRACTS BOOKLET
    Thirty-Fifth Annual INTERNATIONAL PITTSBURGH COAL CONFERENCE University of Pittsburgh · Swanson School of Engineering ABSTRACTS BOOKLET Clean Coal-based Energy/Fuels and the Environment October 15-18, 2018 New Century Grand Hotel Xuzhou Hosted by: The conference acknowledges the support of Co-hosted by: K. C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong A NOTE TO THE READER This Abstracts Booklet is prepared solely as a convenient reference for the Conference participants. Abstracts are arranged in a numerical order of the oral and poster sessions as published in the Final Conference Program. In order to facilitate the task for the reader to locate a specific abstract in a given session, each paper is given two numbers: the first designates the session number and the second represents the paper number in that session. For example, Paper No. 25.1 is the first paper to be presented in the Oral Session #25. Similarly, Paper No. P3.1 is the first paper to appear in the Poster Session #3. It should be cautioned that this Abstracts Booklet is prepared based on the original abstracts that were submitted, unless the author noted an abstract change. The contents of the Booklet do not reflect late changes made by the authors for their presentations at the Conference. The reader should consult the Final Conference Program for any such changes. Furthermore, updated and detailed full manuscripts, published in the Conference Proceedings, will be sent to all registered participants following the Conference. On behalf of the Thirty-Fifth Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, we wish to express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Energy Uses of Coal
    CCC/ 291 NOVEMBER 2018 NON-ENERGY USES OF COAL DR IAN REID NON-ENERGY USES OF COAL IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E APSLEY HOUSE, 176 UPPER RICHMOND R OAD LONDON, SW15 2SH UNITED KINGDOM +44[0]20 3905 3870 WWW.IEA-COAL.ORG AUTHOR DR IAN REID IEA CCC REPORT NUMBER CCC/291 ISBN 978–92–9029–614–0 © IEA CLEAN COAL CENTRE PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2018 3 IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E – NON-ENERGY USES OF C OAL PREFACE This report has been produced by the IEA Clean Coal Centre and is based on a survey and analysis of published literature, and on information gathered in discussions with interested organisations and individuals. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. It should be understood that the views expressed in this report are our own, and are not necessarily shared by those who supplied the information, nor by our member organisations. The IEA Clean Coal Centre was established in 1975 and has contracting parties and sponsors from: Australia, China, the European Commission, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, the UAE, the UK and the USA. The overall objective of the IEA Clean Coal Centre is to continue to provide our members, the IEA Working Party on Fossil Fuels and other interested parties with independent information and analysis on all coal-related trends compatible with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. We consider all aspects of coal production, transport, processing and utilisation, within the rationale for balancing security of supply, affordability and environmental issues. These include efficiency improvements, lowering greenhouse and non-greenhouse gas emissions, reducing water stress, financial resourcing, market issues, technology development and deployment, ensuring poverty alleviation through universal access to electricity, sustainability, and social licence to operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited
    Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited Annual Environmental Management Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Consents, Lease and Licences ................................................................................ 2 1.1.1 Development Consents ................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Mining Leases .................................................................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Licenses ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Mining Operation Plan ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1.5 Environmental Management Plans 5-year Review ......................................................... 3 1.2 Mine Contacts .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Inspection by Department of Industry and Investment NSW (DTIRIS) ...................... 4 2 OPERATIONS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD .................................................... 4 2.1 Exploration ............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Land Preparation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHALLENGE of COAL PREPARATION by Anthony G
    THE CHALLENGE OF COAL PREPARATION By Anthony G. Fonseca Director, Coal Utilization, CONSOL Inc. Library, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT About 45-50% of the coal mined in the U.S. passes through coal preparation plants; east of the Mississippi River this number increases to about 75-80%. Although the cost for coal preparation is worthwhile to some, the coal industry faces the challenges of continuing downward pressure on the price of coal and the impact of new environmental regulations. Coal preparation, as commercially practiced today, is an effective process achieving 75-80% ash reduction, 15-80% trace element reduction, and 85-90% Btu recovery; it is less effective for pyrite reduction (35-70%), and on-line operating time (40-60%), and suffers from obsolete control systems. Methods will be discussed for reducing costs of coal preparation and improving the performance of coal preparation plants. Comments are included on equipment selection, especially for –28 mesh coal, and prep plant operation and control practices. Btu recovery ash and pyrite reduction, fines processing including dewatering and slurry fuel use options are emphasized. Trace element removal and expert control systems for maximization of prep plan operation also will be highlighted. INTRODUCTION Coal preparation is the practice whereby raw coal is modified to a more preferred form to enable its utilization. The methods employed to achieve this preferred modification need to be cost-effective, while also being appropriate to the raw coal, the scale of production and the ultimate end user requirements. Since the cost of coal preparation is a measurable part of mine construction and mine operation, any improvement in the process, any efficiency gain or cost reduction obtained, and any improvements in coal product compatibility to end user requirements achieved, are looked on favorably if or when the product is profitably marketed.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Coal Processing
    Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines COAL PROCESSING WORLD BANK GROUP Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Coal Processing Introduction such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors, are taken into account. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are The applicability of specific technical recommendations should technical reference documents with general and industry- be based on the professional opinion of qualified and specific examples of Good International Industry Practice experienced persons. When host country regulations differ 1 (GIIP) . When one or more members of the World Bank Group from the levels and measures presented in the EHS are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as Guidelines, projects are expected to achieve whichever is more required by their respective policies and standards. These stringent. If less stringent levels or measures than those industry sector EHS guidelines are designed to be used provided in these EHS Guidelines are appropriate, in view of together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which specific project circumstances, a full and detailed justification provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially for any proposed alternatives is needed as part of the site- applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of specific environmental assessment. This justification should multiple industry-sector guidelines may be necessary. A demonstrate that the choice for any alternate performance complete list of industry-sector guidelines can be found at: levels is protective of human health and the environment www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/Content/EnvironmentalGuidelines Applicability The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in The EHS Guidelines for Coal Processing cover the processing new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Coal Mining Weir International, Inc
    INTRODUCTION TO COAL MINING WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. HISTORY OF COAL IN THE UNITED STATES . Coal was one of man’s earliest sources of heat and light . Coal was first discovered in the United States along the Illinois River in the 1670s . First commercial mining occurred near Richmond, Virginia in 1750 . Between 1850 to 1950, coal was the most important energy fuel in the country . Today, coal accounts for more than half of the electric power generation . Coal is also critical for supplying coke for the nation’s steel industry ORIGIN OF COAL . Most of the coal was formed about 300 million years ago . Remains of vegetation sank to the bottom of swamps, forming a soggy, dense material called peat . Deposits of sand, clay and other mineral matter buried the peat . Increasing pressure from deeper burial and heat gradually transformed the peat into coal . The formation of one foot of coal requires an estimated three to seven feet of compacted plant matter TYPES OF COAL . Coal is classified in four general categories or “ranks”: Anthracite Increasing rank Bituminous Increasing carbon content Sub-bituminous Lignite Increasing heating value . The ranking of coal is based primarily on its carbon content and calorific value . The amount of energy in coal is measured in British Thermal Unit (Btu) per pound . Approximately 90% of the coal in the US is in the bituminous or sub-bituminous category MINING METHODS Surface Mining Underground Mining . Surface mining is: . Underground mining is typically employed where surface mining is not economical Generally the least expensive and most productive mining method to extract coal .
    [Show full text]