Enabling Paradigm Shift Towards Low-Carbon Transport in Montenegro

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enabling Paradigm Shift Towards Low-Carbon Transport in Montenegro Enabling Paradigm Shift Towards Low-carbon Transport in Montenegro | Montenegro UNDP 7 December 2019 Enabling Paradigm Shift Towards Low-carbon Transport in Project/Programme Title: Montenegro Country(ies): Montenegro National Designated Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism Authority(ies) (NDA): Accredited Entity(ies) (AE): UNDP Date of first submission/ 2019-12-06 version number: Date of current submission/ 2019-12-06 version number Please submit the completed form to [email protected], using the following name convention in the subject line and file name: “CN-[Accredited Entity or Country]-YYYYMMDD” PROJECT / PROGRAMME CONCEPT NOTE Template V.2.2 Notes • The maximum number of pages should not exceed 12 pages, excluding annexes. Proposals exceeding the prescribed length will not be assessed within the indicative service standard time of 30 days. • As per the Information Disclosure Policy, the concept note, and additional documents provided to the Secretariat can be disclosed unless marked by the Accredited Entity(ies) (or NDAs) as confidential. • The relevant National Designated Authority(ies) will be informed by the Secretariat of the concept note upon receipt. • NDA can also submit the concept note directly with or without an identified accredited entity at this stage. In this case, they can leave blank the section related to the accredited entity. The Secretariat will inform the accredited entity(ies) nominated by the NDA, if any. • Accredited Entities and/or NDAs are encouraged to submit a Concept Note before making a request for project preparation support from the Project Preparation Facility (PPF). • Further information on GCF concept note preparation can be found on GCF website Funding Projects Fine Print. PROJECT / PROGRAMME CONCEPT NOTE Template V.2.2 GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 1 OF 13 A. Project/Programme Summary (max. 1 page) ☒ Project A.2. Public or ☒ Public sector A.1. Project or programme ☐ Programme private sector ☐ Private sector Yes ☐ No ☒ A.3. Is the CN submitted in ☐ Confidential A.4. Confidentiality1 response to an RFP? If yes, specify the RFP: ☒ Not confidential ______________ Mitigation: Reduced emissions from: ☐ Energy access and power generation ☒ Low emission transport ☐ Buildings, cities and industries and appliances A.5. Indicate the result ☐ Forestry and land use areas for the Adaptation: Increased resilience of: project/programme ☐ Most vulnerable people and communities ☐ Health and well-being, and food and water security ☐ Infrastructure and built environment ☐ Ecosystem and ecosystem services A.7. Estimated A.6. Estimated mitigation adaptation impact 77,000 t CO direct impact (tCO2eq over 2e (number of direct NA 468,000 tCO indirect lifespan) 2e beneficiaries and % of population) A.8. Indicative total project Amount: USD 50.5 million A.9. Indicative GCF Amount: USD 12.4 cost (GCF + co-finance) funding requested million A.10. Mark the type of financial instrument ☒ Grant ☐ Reimbursable grant ☐ Guarantees ☐ Equity requested for the GCF ☐ Subordinated loan ☐ Senior Loan ☐ Other: specify___________________ funding A.12. Estimated A.11. Estimated duration a) disbursement period: 6 years project/ Programme 20 years of project/ programme: b) repayment period: n/a lifespan A.13. Is funding from the Yes ☐ No ☒ ☐ A or I-1 Project Preparation Other support received ☐ If so, by A.14. ESS category3 ☒ B or I-2 Facility requested?2 who: ☐ C or I-3 A.15. Is the CN aligned A.16. Has the CN been with your accreditation Yes ☒ No ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ shared with the NDA? standard? Yes ☒ No ☐ A.18. Is the CN A.17. AMA signed (if If no, specify the status of AMA included in the Entity Yes ☒ No ☐ submitted by AE) negotiations and expected date of Work Programme? signing: Montenegro’s transport sector is a significant source of GHG emissions, estimated at 563,000 tCO2e in 2015 and forecasted to grow to 993,000 tCO2e (30% of the national GHG emissions) by 2030. Building on the recently-approved National Transport Strategy, A.19. Project/Programme the project aims at creating an enabling environment and facilitating investment in low- rationale, objectives and carbon passenger transport that will reduce at least 30,000 tCO2e over the project approach of duration, 77,000 t CO2e of direct emissions (in the 10-year lifetime of project assets) and programme/project (max 468,000 tCO2e of indirect emissions (over a 20-year period if the effort is sustained after 100 words) project termination). It will do so by increasing the use of the public transport system, and supporting public and private investment in electric vehicles, as well as and mainstreaming climate change considerations in transport sector policies. 1 Concept notes (or sections of) not marked as confidential may be published in accordance with the Information Disclosure Policy (Decision B.12/35) and the Review of the Initial Proposal Approval Process (Decision B.17/18). 2 See here for access to project preparation support request template and guidelines 3 Refer to the Fund’s environmental and social safeguards (Decision B.07/02) PROJECT / PROGRAMME CONCEPT NOTE Template V.2.2 GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 2 OF 13 B. Project/Programme Information (max. 8 pages) B.1. Context and baseline (max. 2 pages) 1. Context. Montenegro is one of the smallest and youngest countries in the world. It has approximately 620,000 inhabitants and is located in the western part of the Balkan peninsula. In accordance with the Biennal Update Report (BUR), submitted in 2019, GHG emissions in Montenegro have decreased by 40% in 2015, to 3.49 million tCO2e compared to 1990 levels. Transport in Montenegro’s is the only sector with growing GHG emissions, reaching 0.573 million tCO2e or 20% of the national GHG emissions in 2015, and forecasted to reach 0.993 million tCO2e or 30% of the national GHG emissions in 20304. 2. The Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) aims at a 30% reduction of GHG emissions by 2030, compared to the 1990 levels. NDC is being implemented through Montenegro’s National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS), adopted in 2015. NCCS puts a strong focus on harmonization with the EU’s climate change legislative framework. It identifies transport as a top priority sector for climate change action, sets up a quantified target of 30% of personal mobility to be made by public transport in 2030, and calls for measures to promote the uptake of more efficient vehicles, e-mobility, public, non-motorized and other sustainable transport modes. This approach has been integrated in the National Transport Strategy (NTS), adopted in July 2019. 3. Scope of the project (climate mitigation solution).The project focuses on reducing road passenger transport emissions through two actions: improvement of public transport services, and electrification of the public and private passenger vehicle fleets (buses and cars, which will be jointly referred to as “vehicles” in this note). The former would provide a change in the transport mode used by a substantial part of the population from private cars and taxis to urban and interurban public transport, as well as to waterborne services, contributing to the NCCS target of a modal share for public transport of 30% by 2030; the latter provides a direct reduction of GHG emissions and the introduction of electric vehicles in a bus and car market dominated by highly-emiting second-hand vehicles. 4. Two root causes explain GHG emissions growth from road passenger transport: neglected public transport services and a fast-growing car fleet with high emission patterns. Specifically: • Public transport by bus provides low quality services, with old buses, unreliable schedules and low frequency; furthermore, the lack of integration among operators results in inconvenient transfers, need of various tickets and lack of adequate coverage of the territory. The deterioration of public transport services is explained by the weakness of the public institutions in charge of it, an outdated regulatory framework, and defensive management practices focusing on short-term financial stability at the expense of the social and environmental benefits of public transport. As a consequence, the mobility gap between those with and without a car is growing, increasing the vulnerability of already socially-disadvantaged groups and women. • The growing car fleet and its high emissions levels are the consequence of (i) this inadequacy of public transport; (ii) increasing car affordability (motorization rate growth slightly above 2% in the last 5 years), despite low population growth and a sluggish economy, based on the importation of high-emiting second-hand cars from the EU; and (iii) low awareness among the population of the climate impact of car transport. 5. Barriers to the climate mitigation solution fall in two categories: 6. Barriers to the improvement of public transport: • Inadequate regulatory framework of public transport services. Concession contracts are outdated (in Podgorica they expired and have been informally extended) and do not adequately incentivize bus companies to improve service quality. This barrier is addressed by activity 1.1 (see section B.3), building upon current actions efforts undertaken by the GoME (in the context of its NTS) and the city of Podgorica (in the context of its Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan) with the support of EIB and EBRD tp establish an integrated policy approach to passenger mobility. • Lack of integration of public transport services. Public transport authorities lack the resources and technical competences to effectively enforce concession contracts and integrate the services provided by different companies into a consistent system with unified fares, convenient transfers, wide geographical coverage and high customer satisfaction. Although revised in 2018 for interurban services, public transport regulation does not encourage cooperation among operators, does not include key tools such as e-ticketing and does not envisage the adaptation of mobility services to vulnerable users’ needs. Users’ perception of public transport is very negative, which explains the strong growth of taxi services (966 licenses in Podgorica alone), as they provide reliability, privacy and comfort with reasonable fares.
Recommended publications
  • 900 History, Geography, and Auxiliary Disciplines
    900 900 History, geography, and auxiliary disciplines Class here social situations and conditions; general political history; military, diplomatic, political, economic, social, welfare aspects of specific wars Class interdisciplinary works on ancient world, on specific continents, countries, localities in 930–990. Class history and geographic treatment of a specific subject with the subject, plus notation 09 from Table 1, e.g., history and geographic treatment of natural sciences 509, of economic situations and conditions 330.9, of purely political situations and conditions 320.9, history of military science 355.009 See also 303.49 for future history (projected events other than travel) See Manual at 900 SUMMARY 900.1–.9 Standard subdivisions of history and geography 901–909 Standard subdivisions of history, collected accounts of events, world history 910 Geography and travel 920 Biography, genealogy, insignia 930 History of ancient world to ca. 499 940 History of Europe 950 History of Asia 960 History of Africa 970 History of North America 980 History of South America 990 History of Australasia, Pacific Ocean islands, Atlantic Ocean islands, Arctic islands, Antarctica, extraterrestrial worlds .1–.9 Standard subdivisions of history and geography 901 Philosophy and theory of history 902 Miscellany of history .2 Illustrations, models, miniatures Do not use for maps, plans, diagrams; class in 911 903 Dictionaries, encyclopedias, concordances of history 901 904 Dewey Decimal Classification 904 904 Collected accounts of events Including events of natural origin; events induced by human activity Class here adventure Class collections limited to a specific period, collections limited to a specific area or region but not limited by continent, country, locality in 909; class travel in 910; class collections limited to a specific continent, country, locality in 930–990.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Analysis of the Montenegrin Legal, Institutional and Financial Frameworks in the Field of E- Mobility
    Situation Analysis of the Montenegrin Legal, Institutional and Financial Frameworks in the Field of E- Mobility Study prepared by EnergyInstitute Hrvoje Požar | Zagreb |February 2019 The GEF unites 182 countries in partnership with international institutions, non- governmental organizations (NGOs), and the private sector to address global environmental issues while supporting national sustainable development initiatives. Today the GEF is the largest public funder of projects that improve the global environment. As an independently operating financial organization, the GEF provides grants for projects related to biodiversity, climate change, international waters, land degradation, the ozone layer, and persistent organic pollutants. Since 1991, GEF has achieved a strong track record both with developing countries and with countries whose economies are in transition, and has provided $9.2 billion in the form of grants and leveraging worth $40 billion in the co-financing of more than 2,700 projects in over 168 countries. www.thegef.org. UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and that can drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground, in some 170 countries and territories, we offer a global perspective and local insight that helps to empower lives and build resilient nations. This study was prepared for the project 'Towards Carbon Neutral Tourism in Montenegro'. It was implemented by UNDP in cooperation with the Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism, the Ministry of Economy and the Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs and was funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).
    [Show full text]
  • Radoje Vujadinović Associate Professor
    Curriculum vitae PERSONAL INFORMATION Radoje Vujadinović Mila Radunovića S1/48, 81000 Podgorica (Montenegro) +382 20 243 204 +382 67 544 766 [email protected] www.ucg.ac.me/mf POSITION Associate professor on the following courses: Road Vehicles, Maintenance of Road Vehicles, Traffic Planning, Road Traffic and Ecology, Energy Efficiency in Road Transport, Road Transport and the Environment, Transport and Environmental Protection WORK EXPERIENCE 1998–2018 University of Montenegro, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Working experience: 20 years of professional experience in the transport sector, in particular at the intersection of energy, environment and transport in Montenegro obtained in research and practice; Specific experience: Preparation of environmental impact assessment, feasibility studies, conceptual designs, preliminary designs, main designs for facilities for production electricity from renewable energy sources Research areas: Measurement exhaust emission from vehicles, Modeling of CO2 emission, Biofuels, Energy Efficiency in Road Transport, Renewable Energy Source (water, sun, wind), Sustainable Development. PERSONAL SKILLS Mother tongue(s) Montenegrin Foreign language(s) UNDERSTANDING SPEAKING WRITING Listening Reading Spoken interaction Spoken production English C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Slovenian B2 B2 B1 B1 B1 Russian A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 Levels: A1 and A2: Basic user - B1 and B2: Independent user - C1 and C2: Proficient user Common European Framework of Reference for Languages Communication skills Good communication skills gained through my two decade long experience as associate and professor at the University of Montenegro Organisational / managerial skills Vice Dean for Finance 2016- Head of Center for Engines and Vehicles 2016- Job-related skills Basic (Microsoft Office, Internet and Email, AutoCad), Programming (Matlab, Fortran), LEAP, COPERT III, COPERT IV, VECTO, CO2MPAS etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes4u Project Feasibility Study on the Roman Heritage Route in the Adriatic and Ionian Region
    Routes4U Project Feasibility Study on the Roman Heritage Route in the Adriatic and Ionian Region Routes4U Feasibility Study on an Iron Age cultural route in the Danube Region Routes4U Project Routes4U Feasibility study on an Iron Age cultural route in the Danube Region ROUTES4U FEASIBILITY STUDY ON AN IRON AGE CULTURAL ROUTE IN THE DANUBE REGION August 2019 The present study has been developed in the framework of Routes4U, the Joint Programme between the Council of Europe and the European Commission (DG REGIO). Routes4U aims to foster regional development through the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe programme in the four EU macro-regions: the Adriatic and Ionian, Alpine, Baltic Sea and Danube Regions. A special thank you goes to the author Martin Fera, and to the numerous partners and stakeholders who supported the study. The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. www.coe.int/routes4u 2 / 57 Routes4U Feasibility study on an Iron Age cultural route in the Danube Region CONTENTS Contents ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 5 II. ANALYSIS OF THE “STATE OF THE ART” OF IRON AGE HERITAGE IN THE DANUBE REGION...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION on TOURISM in 2009 Ministry of Tourism INTRODUCTION
    Ministry of Tourism INFORMATION ON TOURISM IN 2009 Ministry of Tourism INTRODUCTION The 2009 tourist season progressed in extraordinary circumstances, giv- en the economic crisis which largely influenced tourist trends not only in our country but in the region as well. The projections of the 2009 Economic Policy are achieved. Finan- cial and physical indicators are at the level of the last year’s indicators, and surveys show a high level of satisfaction of tourists. Having in mind objective conditions, the achieved results can be considered a large suc- cess. Activities focused on preparing the season Ministry of Tourism Within the preparations for this year’s tourist season, considerable funds were in- vested in improving communal and road infrastructures. During the season, the work of communal services and power supply sys- tem were at a satisfactory level, and when speaking about water-supply, a number of activities were undertaken to reduce losses of the existing network by replacing worn-out pipes, and finding new springs in order to provide a longer-term solution to the problem. It is expected that majority of works will be completed next season, so municipality networks will be ready for the completion of the Project Regional Water-supply System. ● road infrastructure - more than 27 million € invested ● airport infrastructure – more than 6 million € invested ● transmission and distribution network improved– more than 4 million € invested ● infrastructure on border crossings improved and the time tourists spend on border crossings
    [Show full text]
  • Trends and Prospects Montenegro
    The Authority on World Travel & Tourism Travel & Tourism: Trends and Prospects MONTENEGRO 1 CHAIRMAN MARRIOTT COSTA CRUISES LOEWS HOTELS WILDERNESS SAFARIS INTERNATIONAL Pier Luigi Foschi Jonathan M Tisch Andy Payne ABERCROMBIE & KENT INC Chairman & Chief Executive Chairman & Chief Executive Chief Executive Officer Geoffrey J W Kent JW Marriott, Jr Officer Officer Founder, Chairman & CEO Chairman & Chief Executive VIRTUOSO LTD Officer CTRIP.COM MESSE BERLIN GMBH Matthew D Upchurch CTC INTERNATIONAL Raimund Hosch Chief Executive Officer PRESIDENT & CEO Arne M Sorenson Min Fan President & Chief Executive President & Chief Operating Chief Executive Officer Officer ZAGAT SURVEY LLC Tim Zagat WORLD TRAVEL & Officer DEPARTMENT OF MGM RESORTS Co-Founder, Co-Chair & Chief TOURISM COUNCIL MELIÁ HOTELS Executive Officer David Scowsill TOURISM & COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, GOVERMENT Jim Murren ZARA INVESTMENT Sebastián Escarrer OF DUBAI Chief Executive Officer HOLDING CO LTD Vice Chairman Khalid A bin Sulayem VICE CHAIRMEN Yassin K Talhouni Director General MISSION HILLS GROUP OUTRIGGER ENTERPRISES Dr Ken Chu Chief Executive Officer WORLD TRAVEL & GROUP DLA PIPER Chairman & Chief Executive TOURISM COUNCIL Dr Richard R Kelley Sir Nigel Knowles Officer Jean-Claude Baumgarten HONORARY MEMBERS Chairman Emeritus Co-Chief Executive Officer MÖVENPICK HOTELS & MANDARIN ORIENTAL RIOFORTE INVESTMENTS DOLPHIN CAPITAL RESORTS ACCOR Edouard Ettedgui SA INVESTORS Jean Gabriel Pérès Gérard Pélisson Group Chief Executive Manuel Fernando Espírito
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Tourism of Montenegro
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346794369 CULTURAL TOURISM OF MONTENEGRO Article in Journal of Awareness · November 2020 DOI: 10.26809/joa.5.037 CITATIONS READS 0 47 2 authors, including: Nikola M. Vukčević University of Donja Gorica 12 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Nikola M. Vukčević on 19 December 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Awareness Cilt / Volume 5, Sayı / Issue 4, 2020, pp. 527-534 E - ISSN: 2149-6544 URL: https://journals.gen.tr/joa DOİ: https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.5.037 Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article CULTURAL TOURISM OF MONTENEGRO 1 Nikola M. VUKČEVIĆ* & Nina VUKČEVIĆ** * Teaching Assistant at Faculty of Arts and Communication, University of Donja Gorica, Podgorica, MONTENEGRO, e-mail:[email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0515-0353 ** PR Manager of National Tourism Organisation of Montenegro, Ministry of Sustainable Develompent and Tourism of Montenegro, MONTENEGRO, e-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-527X Received: 07 October 2020; Accepted: 21 October 2020 ABSTRACT In this paper the proposed approaches to the management of cultural tourism and tourism in general are considered. The first is a review of the historical context of cultural tourism, and, through the collection of the opinions of numerous authors, an overview of the concept itself. Then there was a parallel between broken concepts, culture and tourism, and synergy and networking of these two terms. Furthermore, Montenegro is taken to be the study case, as country which has been recognizable in previous years, as one of the prosperous tourist countries in the region and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Mapping Report MONTENEGRO
    ENG Enlarged Partial Agreement on Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe December 2020 Country Mapping Report MONTENEGRO Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe Country Mapping report Montenegro with a view to identify potential for extension of existing Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe as well as emerging themes for new cultural routes Prepared by: Aleksandra Kapetanović December 2020 Country Mapping report for Montenegro | 2 Content 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 2. Framing and context of the report ................................................................................... 14 2.1. Background/ the aim of the Country Mapping report for Montenegro ........................... 14 2.2. Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe ................................................................... 14 2.3. Montenegro as a member of the Enlarged Partial Agreement on Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe (EPA) ..................................................................................................... 18 2.4. Current Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe in Montenegro .................................. 19 2.5. Activities in order to join the University Network for Cultural Routes Studies ................. 26 3. National Heritage Policies and Legislations ....................................................................... 27 3.1. Cultural heritage of Montenegro ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Low Carbon Tourism in Montenegro Final Report
    SURVEY ON LOW CARBON TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO FINAL REPORT Report prepared by: E3 Consulting Energy-Ecology-Economy 2015. Survey on Low Carbon Tourism in Montenegro is conducted in July 2015 in cooperation with the Centre for sustainable development and E3 Consulting Podgorica. 2 SURVEY ON LOW CARBON TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO, 2015. PROJECT SUPERVISORS: PhD Jelena Janjusevic, director of the Centre for sustainable development Radica Zekovic, Analyst, Centre for sustainable development Viktor Subotic, UNDP Montenegro Dragana Cenic, UNDP Montenegro Ana Pajevic, UNDP Montenegro PROJECT TEAM: MSci Milica Dakovic, Project supervisor Budimka Golubovic, Project manager PhD Andrija Djurovic, Methodologist MSci Aleksandar Janicic, Economic Analyst Aleksandra Popovic, Economic Analyst Ivana Jankovic, Economic Analyst Maida Muratovic, Environmental Protection Specialist 3 SURVEY ON LOW CARBON TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO, 2015. 4 SURVEY ON LOW CARBON TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO, 2015. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Survey on low-carbon tourism in Montenegro was conducted in 6 coastal municipalities (Bar, Budva, Herceg Novi, Kotor, Tivat, Ulcinj) and Old Royal Capital Cetinje and it included three target groups: 1) 1,000 visiting tourists; 2) 100 travel and tourism sector representatives; and 3) relevant central & local authorities in the area of tourism and environmental protection. Tourists, travel and tourism sector representatives and relevant central & local authorities in the area of tourism and environmental protection in general showed quite poor awareness level on low carbon growth and knowledge on low carbon services and products throughout the travel and tourism supply chain. Still, general perception is that Montenegro is pure and nature-friendly tourism destination. There were no concretely stated low carbon travel and tourism products or services offered in Montenegro, except for Marina Porto Montenegro with ecological standards for yachts.
    [Show full text]
  • Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate
    ILLYRIAN POLICY OF ROME IN THE LATE REPUBLIC AND EARLY PRINCIPATE Danijel Dzino Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics University of Adelaide August 2005 II Table of Contents TITLE PAGE I TABLE OF CONTENTS II ABSTRACT V DECLARATION VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF PLATES AND MAPS IX 1. Introduction, approaches, review of sources and secondary literature 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Rome and Illyricum (a short story) 2 1.3 Methodology 6 1.4.1 Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Policy as an interaction between systems 9 1.4.2 The Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Working hypothesis 11 1.5 The stages in the Roman Illyrian relationship (the development of a political/constitutional framework) 16 1.6 Themes and approaches: Illyricum in Roman historiography 18 1.7.1 Literature review: primary sources 21 1.7.2 Literature review: modern works 26 2. Illyricum in Roman foreign policy: historical outline, theoretical approaches and geography 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Roman foreign policy: Who made it, how and why was it made, and where did it stop 30 2.3 The instruments of Roman foreign policy 36 2.4 The place of Illyricum in the Mediterranean political landscape 39 2.5 The geography and ethnography of pre-Roman Illyricum 43 III 2.5.1 The Greeks and Celts in Illyricum 44 2.5.2 The Illyrian peoples 47 3. The Illyrian policy of Rome 167 – 60 BC: Illyricum - the realm of bifocality 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Prelude: the making of bifocality 56 3.3 The South and Central Adriatic 60 3.4 The North Adriatic 65 3.5 Republican policy in Illyricum before Caesar: the assessment 71 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Tourism in Montenegro – Economic Dynamics, Spatial Developments and Future Perspectives
    HRVATSKI GEOGRAFSKI GLASNIK 73/1, 165 – 180 (2011.) UDK 379.8:911.3](497.16) Preliminary communication 911.3:33](497.16) Prethodno priopćenje Coastal Tourism in Montenegro – Economic Dynamics, Spatial Developments and Future Perspectives Matthias Bickert, Daniel Göler, Holger Lehmeier Montenegro seeks its future perspectives in tourism. And there are good reasons for that: The country was considered to be the fastest growing tourism market worldwide in 2007. Notwithstanding a slight decrease during the last years, tourism is still seen as a crucial factor for future economic development. This seems to be a viable option if we consider Montenegro’s natural potential, its beneficial position on the Adriatic coastline and the experience in tourism gained in the many years since the 1970s. These dynamic developments were motivation enough to explore tourism in Montene- gro in a research project with strong empirical evidence, organised as co-operation between Universities from Germany, Albania, Montenegro and Serbia. Our empirical approach included semi-structured, flexible interviews with different types of stakeholders. Since tourism in Montenegro is still almost entirely limited to the coast, we chose three coastal hot-spots in tourism, namely Kotor, Budva and Ulcinj. Our results show that the current development in tourism can surely be considered as progressive and dynamic. But it is also strongly affected by multiple polarisations and divergent trends. There is a need for infrastructural upgrades in the mass tourism sector, which is for the most part a low budget market with very difficult future perspectives. At the same time, there is a small but growing number of very exclusive offers, often seen as the vanguard of Montenegro’s future as an upper class tourists’ destination.
    [Show full text]
  • International Yachting Guide Montenegro Outlook Wind & Weather
    INTERNATIONAL YACHTING GUIDE Wild Beauty N Pr´canj PODGORICA Herceg Novi u i r Tivat e Kotor Zelenika t CETINJE Porto Montenegro Budva o Petrovac Skadar Lake Slovenia Croatia N Bosnia and Herzegovia Bar ADRIATIC SEA Serbia p Italy Albania Ulcinj Content Preface 2 The Adriatic Sea … A Water Paradise With this Yachting Guide the National Tourism Organisation invites nautical 3 Outlook tourists to spend their holidays on the Montenegrin coast and its waters. 3 Wind & Weather This publication offers basic informa- tion as well as internet links and 4 Going Ashore addresses for holiday planning. For more detailed information and book- Port Locations ing requests we will gladly help. 5 e Port of Herceg Novi We are looking forward to your visit and hope you have a relaxing and 6 r Port of Zelenika exciting holiday in the wild beauty of Montenegro. 7 t Porto Montenegro Your National Tourism 8 u Marina Prcanj Organisation Montenegro 9 i Port of Kotor 10 o Marina Budva This Yachting Guide is meant as an aid to nautically interested tourists 11 p Marina Bar who intend to visit the waters and ports of Montenegro. This yachting 12 Laws & Provisions guide does not claim to be a harbour guide or pilotage aid. We would 14 Charter Companies in Montenegro like to thank the Maritime Safety Department in Bar, the Ministry 14 Montenegro in Numbers of Tourism and the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and 15 Important Phone Numbers and Addresses Telekommunication for their co- operation and support. 15 National Parks and Diving in Montenegro 16 Car Rental The Adriatic Sea … A Water Paradise The Adriatic Sea stretches over 820 kilometres from northwest to south- east and covers an area of 132,000 square metres offering a water play- ground par excellence.
    [Show full text]