DOING BUSINESS in GERMANY Overview on Taxation March 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

DOING BUSINESS IN GERMANY Overview on Taxation March 2015 1. Introduction 2.3. The taxable income includes the corporation’s current profits or losses as well as any capital gains. In general, the entire 1.1. Generally, taxes are administered and enforced by the profit is fully taxable. However, there are some exemptions. competent local tax office. These local tax offices administer For example, the German Corporate Tax Act provides for a in particular the income tax to be paid by individuals, 95% tax exemption of dividends received, as well as capital Corporate Income Tax (CIT) to be paid by corporations as well gains from the sale of shares in other German or foreign as Value Added Tax (VAT) and Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT), corporations, unless certain restrictions apply. However, this where applicable. Trade tax is based on the assessment of tax exemption may not be available if the selling corporation corporate taxes but is enforced and assessed by the local is a bank or other financial institution or, under certain municipalities conditions, is a holding company that holds the shares as 1.2. The Federal Central Tax OfficeBundeszentralamt ( für Steuern) trading assets. Further, to qualify for the exemption relating is, among other things, responsible for foreign taxpayers, e.g. to dividends, the parent company must hold at least 10% for the exemption and tax refund of withholding tax according of shares in the subsidiary. The tax exemption applies to double tax treaties and EU directives, advanced transfer irrespective of a minimum holding period. In return, any pricing agreements as well as the issuance of tax rulings for losses arising from the ownership of shares, as for example foreign investors and for several measures in connection with from the disposal or liquidation, are not tax deductible on the VAT on cross-border supplies and services. level of the corporation. 2.4. The CIT rate is 15%. In addition, the solidarity surcharge 2. Companies of 5.5% is levied on the amount of CIT due, resulting in an aggregate tax rate of 15.825%. The local tax office where 2.1. Corporations, such as the German Limited Liability Company the central management of the corporation is located is the (GmbH) or Stock Corporation (AG) that are tax-resident in competent office for assessing the CIT. Germany are subject to CIT on their worldwide income, unless 2.5. Corporations are also subject to municipal trade tax. relieved by double tax treaties. Corporations are resident Foreign businesses which do not have their registered office in Germany if their effective place of management or their or place of management in Germany but receive income registered officeSitz ( ) is located in Germany. The place which is allocated to a German permanent establishment are of management is the centre of the top management of a also subject to trade tax. The basic trade tax rate is 3.5% corporation. It is located where the commercial matters of which is supplemented by the application of a multiplier some importance for the corporation are effectively decided, fixed by the competent municipality and that varies from a usually at the directors’ office. The registered office of a minimum rate of 200% up to around 500%. Thus, the effective corporation is determined by the articles of association of the trade tax rate ranges from 7% to around 17.5%. As a result, corporation. Foreign corporations that have neither its place corporations are subject to CIT (including solidarity surcharge) of management nor its registered office in Germany are only and trade tax at a combined rate between 22.825% and subject to CIT on their German-source income. 33.325%. For trade tax purposes, the above mentioned 95% 2.2. The calculation of the taxable income is based on tax exemption of dividends received from other corporations the annual financial statements Handelsbilanz( ) drawn up requires a minimum shareholding of 15% as of the beginning pursuant to German generally accepted accounting principles of the respective fiscal year. which must then be modified under specific provisions of tax 2.6. Both CIT and trade tax are assessed on an annual basis. law. These notably include regulations on the treatment of However, the determination of the taxable income may hidden profit distributions and restrictions on the deductibility refer to a 12-month period deviating from the calendar year. of business expenses, in particular with respect to debt Additionally, corporations are obligated to make quarterly financing expenditures. prepayments of CIT and trade tax which are based on an estimate of the current year’s tax amount due. 2.7. For CIT and trade tax purposes, a general limitation to the 2.10. Dividends: In general, corporations have to withhold taxes deduction of interest payments applies, relating to both for all dividends and other profit distributions, irrespective third party loans and shareholder loans. Under the interest of whether the recipient or shareholder is a German or deduction ceiling (Zinsschranke), interest expenses exceeding foreign entity. The withholding tax is 25% plus the additional interest income (net interest) will only be deductible up to solidarity surcharge of 5.5%, resulting in an aggregate 30% of the corporation´s EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax rate of 26.375%. The withholding tax is credible at taxes, depreciation and amortization). The interest deduction shareholder level against the overall CIT liability. In case ceiling will apply (a) if the overall net interest exceeds that a foreign corporation is subject to limited tax liability €3 million (threshold) and (b) in case that the corporation in Germany, the withholding tax can be reduced to 15.825% does not belong to a group of companies, if a “harmful (including solidarity surcharge) if certain substance criteria debt financing” is in place, which is a debt financing by are met. An exemption from withholding tax applies under shareholders with more than 25% shareholding, related the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive for distributions to foreign parties or third parties (e.g. banks) with recourse to such EU corporations with a minimum shareholding of 10%. The shareholders or related party, and interest paid for such debt withholding tax can also be reduced to a lower rate or be exceeds 10% of the overall net interest; or (c) in case that avoided/reclaimed under a respective double tax treaty. the corporation belongs to a group of companies, if “harmful However, the reduction as well as limitation and exemptions debt financing” exists in any group company and the financing under the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive or the double tax 25% shareholder, related party or third party with recourse treaties are subject to a German anti-treaty shopping rule to the shareholder or related party is not part of the group; or whereby the limitation or exemption is not available if the the equity ratio of the borrowing corporation is lower than the recipient is an interposed entity with insufficient “substance”. one of the consolidated group. Net interest expenses that are 2.11. German partnerships, as for example the General not deductible under these rules may be carried forward to Partnership (OHG) or Limited Partnership (KG), are not subject subsequent financial years and may only be deducted within to income tax or CIT. Instead, CIT or income tax is levied at the limits of the interest deduction ceiling. the level of the partners of the partnership (transparency 2.8. Transfer pricing: Under the arm’s length principle, the principle). The income is determined “uniformly and consideration of any intercompany transaction must conform separately” on the level of the partnership and attributed to the level that would have applied if the transaction to the partners in proportion to its equity interest in the would have taken place between unrelated third parties. In partnership. The income tax rate for partners is equivalent to cases where the arm’s lengths principle is not met, the tax the tax rate for individuals. Partnerships may obtain business authority may be entitled to adjust the tax base resulting in income or conduct private asset management. Partnerships an additional taxable income. The tax office may also charge which only conduct private asset management, as for penalties. Further, tax payers are required to maintain proper example generating dividends, interest or lease income, do transfer pricing documentation in cases of intercompany not gain business income. The partnership itself is subject to cross-border transactions with respect to the type and municipal trade tax in case its activities can be qualified as content of the business relationships with related parties a trade under the German Trade Tax Act. However, the trade including details on the calculation of transfer prices. In case tax can generally be offset to a large extent with the personal that no or insufficient documentation is available, the tax income tax liability of an individual partner in proportion to its authorities are entitled to estimate a higher tax base and, equity interest in the partnership. additionally, penalty payments may be assessed. 2.9. The German rules for groups of companies (Organschaft) 3. Individuals under the Corporate Income Tax Act require a more than 50% shareholding in a subsidiary and a profit and loss transfer 3.1. Tax liability: A person’s taxation status in Germany depends agreement (Ergebnisabführungsvertrag) according to German on its residence status. An individual is deemed to be a corporate law, which is concluded between the group parent resident in Germany if the individual has a domestic domicile company and the subsidiary and executed for a period of at or a domestic customary place of abode. Nationality is not least five years. As a result, the subsidiary’s net income is a relevant criterion for determining the residence status or attributed to the group parent company for CIT and trade tax tax liability of individuals under German tax law.
Recommended publications
  • The African-American Church, Political Activity, and Tax Exemption

    The African-American Church, Political Activity, and Tax Exemption

    JAMES_EIC 1/11/2007 9:47:35 PM The African-American Church, Political Activity, and Tax Exemption Vaughn E. James∗ ABSTRACT Ever since its inception during slavery, the African-American Church has served as an advocate for the socio-economic improve- ment of this nation’s African-Americans. Accordingly, for many years, the Church has been politically active, serving as the nurturing ground for several African-American politicians. Indeed, many of the country’s early African-American legislators were themselves mem- bers of the clergy of the various denominations that constituted the African-American Church. In 1934, Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code to pro- hibit tax-exempt entities—including churches and other houses of worship—from allowing lobbying to constitute a “substantial part” of their activities. In 1954, Congress further amended the Code to place an absolute prohibition on political campaigning by these tax-exempt organizations. While these amendments did not specifically target churches and other houses of worship, they have had a chilling effect on efforts by these entities to fulfill their mission. This chilling effect is felt most acutely by the African-American Church, a church estab- lished to preach the Gospel and engage in activities which would im- prove socio-economic conditions for the nation’s African-Americans. This Article discusses the efforts made by the African-American Church to remain faithful to its mission and the inadvertent attempts ∗ Professor of Law, Texas Tech University School of Law. The author wishes to thank Associate Dean Brian Shannon, Texas Tech University School of Law; Profes- sor Christian Day, Syracuse University College of Law; Professor Dwight Aarons, Uni- versity of Tennessee College of Law; Ms.
  • System of Church Tax in Germany

    System of Church Tax in Germany

    Dr. Jens Petersen The system of church tax in Germany The church tax will be 9% (or 8% in Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg) from the income tax. The churches, who have the status of a public body have the legal right to raise taxes. This based apon the Germen Constitution in conjunction with the federal church laws. These are the protestant, roman-kath., old-kath., some jewish and other small churches. The churches conclude wether they raise taxes and about the percentage. The administration itself is carreid-over to IRS because here is the established administration. This based on an bilateral contract. The IRS will get fees between 2% and 4% (according to the federal state). The churches have the legal right to get the data of their members from the IRS the fullfill their own tax-systems. At the time they did not need them because the IRS administrate the tax levy. The church tax is the most important part of the churches household. It will be about 70% to 80% of it. Other incomes: funds, fees, accomplishments (benefits) from the state (very old legal title; based on a treaty of 1804), other revenues. Income tax will be raised from income and salary a.s.o. The church tax from the income-tax will collect in conjunction with the income-tax (tax bill). The church tax of salary will retained by the employer and he refers them to the appropriate IRS. This refers it to the local church. Wether the employee is member of a church the employer will check out from the tax-card (Lohnsteuerkarte).
  • 302746 ICE Country Guide

    302746 ICE Country Guide

    International Core of Excellence 2018 ICE Essentials Foreword Local insight into key foreign jurisdictions—International Core of Excellence The impact of the U.S. tax reform will be felt not only in the U.S. but around the world. While it likely will take some time for stakeholders to familiarize themselves fully with the new rules and evaluate their implications and consequences, U.S. businesses soon will have to make real- world decisions that will affect their foreign operations: decisions regarding cash repatriation, adjustments to ownership structures for foreign investments, acquisition financing where multiple jurisdictions are involved, organization of supply chain activities, etc. When that time comes, the focus will no longer be solely on the new U.S. rules. Companies will be looking for practical solutions that best serve the interest of their businesses and those solutions will have to accommodate non-U.S. tax factors—for example, it is important to be aware that steps taken to limit a tax cost in the U.S. may eventuate in a higher tax burden outside the U.S. In this respect, one thing has not changed: U.S. companies will still need to integrate non-U.S. tax considerations into their decision-making. Now more than ever, they will need reliable and timely information—as well as actionable insights—on tax policy, legislation and practices affecting their foreign operations if they are to maintain a competitive edge. We are committed to helping you and your organization navigate the opportunities and challenges of a rapidly evolving global tax environment. The foreign country specialists in the International Core of Excellence (ICE) team have the technical and practical experience to help you identify and address the impact of foreign tax rules on U.S.
  • Taxation and Investment in Denmark 2015 Reach, Relevance and Reliability

    Taxation and Investment in Denmark 2015 Reach, Relevance and Reliability

    Taxation and Investment in Denmark 2015 Reach, relevance and reliability A publication of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Contents 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment 1.2 Currency 1.3 Banking and financing 1.4 Foreign investment 1.5 Tax incentives 1.6 Exchange controls 2.0 Setting up a business 2.1 Principal forms of business entity 2.2 Regulation of business 2.3 Accounting, filing and auditing filing requirements 3.0 Business taxation 3.1 Overview 3.2 Residence 3.3 Taxable income and rates 3.4 Capital gains taxation 3.5 Double taxation relief 3.6 Anti-avoidance rules 3.7 Administration 3.8 Other taxes on business 4.0 Withholding taxes 4.1 Dividends 4.2 Interest 4.3 Royalties 4.4 Branch remittance tax 4.5 Wage tax/social security contributions 5.0 Indirect taxes 5.1 Value added tax 5.2 Capital tax 5.3 Real estate tax 5.4 Transfer tax 5.5 Stamp duty 5.6 Customs and excise duties 5.7 Environmental taxes 5.8 Other taxes 6.0 Taxes on individuals 6.1 Residence 6.2 Taxable income and rates 6.3 Inheritance and gift tax 6.4 Net wealth tax 6.5 Property tax 6.6 Social security contributions 6.7 Other taxes 6.8 Compliance 7.0 Labor environment 7.1 Employee rights and remuneration 7.2 Wages and benefits 7.3 Termination of employment 7.4 Labor-management relations 7.5 Employment of foreigners 8.0 Deloitte International Tax Source 9.0 Office locations Denmark Taxation and Investment 2015 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment Denmark is a parliamentary democracy.
  • Tax and Transfer Research Group, Berlin

    Tax and Transfer Research Group, Berlin

    UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM WIRTSCHAFTS- UND SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FAKULTÄT Lehrstuhl für Finanzwissenschaft Hans-Georg Petersen International Experience with Alternative Forms of Social Protection: Lessons for the Reform Process in Russia Diskussionsbeitrag 44 Potsdam 2004 Hans-Georg Petersen University of Potsdam and German Institute of Economic Research, Berlin Tel.: (+49) 0331 977 3394 E-mail: [email protected] International Experience with Alternative Forms of Social Protection: Lessons for the Reform Process in Russia Prof. Dr. Hans-Georg Petersen1 University of Potsdam and German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Report for the Russian Foundation for Social Reforms in the Framework of the Project to Promote Structural Reforming in the System of the Population’s Social Protection Supported by the World Bank Mit den Finanzwissenschaftlichen Diskussionsbeiträgen werden Manuskripte von den Verfassern möglichen Interessenten in einer vorläufigen Fassung zugänglich gemacht. Für Inhalt und Verteilung sind die Autoren verantwortlich. Es wird gebeten, sich mit Anregungen und Kritik direkt an sie zu wenden und etwaige Zitate aus ihrer Arbeit vorher mit ihnen abzustimmen. Alle Rechte liegen bei den Verfassern. ISSN 0948 - 7549 1 The author would like to thank Mathias Brehe and Klaus Müller for great support. Of course, responsibility for any remaining errors rests with the author alone. 1 Contents Charts and Tables 3 1. Introduction 5 2. Basic Issues of Social Protection 8 2.1. Targets, Means and Benefits of Social Protection 8 2.2. Standard Risks and Possible Institutional Settings for Social Protection 12 2.2.1. Market Structure for Pension and Health Insurance 12 2.2.2. Systems of Social Protection and Security 14 2.2.2.1.
  • 2021 Clergy Tax Return Preparation Guide for 2020 Returns

    2021 Clergy Tax Return Preparation Guide for 2020 Returns

    2021 Clergy Tax Return Preparation Guide For 2020 Returns A Supplement to the 2021 Clergy Tax Return Preparation Guide for 2020 Returns For the 2020 tax year, the Church Pension Group (CPG) is providing the 2021 Clergy Tax Return Preparation Guide for 2020 Returns and the 2021 Federal Reporting Requirements for Episcopal Churches, Schools, and Institutions (Federal Reporting Requirements Guide) as references to help clergy, treasurers and bookkeepers, and tax preparers in better understanding clergy taxes. These guides are available on CPG’s website at cpg.org. This supplement complements the guides. The supplement is presented in two sections. First, a section on tax highlights addresses recent tax changes. Second, a question-and-answer format addresses key tax issues, and information provided in the guides and how it specifically applies to clergy of The Episcopal Church. Note: If you have questions about clergy federal income taxes that are not covered here, please call CPG’s Tax Hotline: Nancy Fritschner, CPA (877) 305-1414 Mary Ann Hanson, CPA (877) 305-1415 Dolly Rios,* CPA (833) 363-5751 *Fluent in English and Spanish Please note that the service these individuals will provide is of an informational nature. It should not be viewed as tax, legal, financial, or other advice. You must contact your tax advisor for assistance in preparing your tax returns or for other tax advice. Tax Highlights The SECURE (Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement) Act of 2019 is now law. Most provisions in the law became effective January 1, 2020. Listed below are some of the most important changes that could have a significant impact on you.
  • Mormon Profit: Brigham Young, Tithing, and the Bureau of Internal Revenue

    Mormon Profit: Brigham Young, Tithing, and the Bureau of Internal Revenue

    Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2019 Mormon Profit: Brigham oung,Y Tithing, and the Bureau of Internal Revenue Samuel D. Brunson Follow this and additional works at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Tax Law Commons Mormon Profit: Brigham Young, Tithing, and the Bureau of Internal Revenue Samuel D. Brunson* Since the enactment of the modern federal income tax, churches have been exempt from taxation. But that exemption is neither necessary nor inevitable. In fact, at the end of the 1860s, the Bureau of Internal Revenue decided that tithing received by the Mormon church was taxable under the Civil War income tax. At the time, Mormons distrusted the federal government and the federal government, in turn, distrusted the Mormons. The question of taxation was a small part of a larger legal and existential battle between the Mormons and the government. This Article situates the question of the taxability of tithing in the broader legal and relational conflict. More important, it tells the story of how the income tax threatened to fundamentally change the Mormon church and how Mormon leaders reacted to that threat, both with increasingly sophisticated legal arguments and, in the event their legal argumentationfailed, with plans to take the tax law into account. CONTENTS IN TRO D U CTIO N ................................................................................................... 42 I. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX .......................................... 47 A . The Civil W ar Incom e Tax .......................................................................... 47 B. The Bureau of Internal Revenue ............................................................ 49 * Georgia Reithal Professor of Law, Loyola University Chicago School of Law. I am grateful for comments from David J.
  • The Swiss Tax System –– Main Features of the Swiss Tax System

    The Swiss Tax System –– Main Features of the Swiss Tax System

    The Swiss Tax System – Main features of the Swiss tax system The Swiss Tax System The Swiss Tax – Federal taxes – Cantonal and communal taxes 2019 edition Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft Confédération suisse Confederazione Svizzera Confederaziun svizra 2019 Swiss Confederation Swiss Tax Conference Information Committee Federal Tax Administration FTA Issuer Swiss Tax Conference Information Committee Author Federal Tax Administration 3003 Bern Illustrations Barrigue Lausanne Print JP OPTIMUM SA 1110 Morges Unit price 1 – 10 units: CHF 9 11 – 100 units: CHF 7 101 units or more: CHF 5 Flat-rate price for schools: CHF 5 / unit ISSN 1664-8447 2nd edition 2019 Preface This brochure is suited primarily for foreign nationals interested in learning about the Swiss tax system. It gives an easy-to-under- stand overview of the taxes levied by the Confederation, cantons and communes. This brochure is issued by the Information Committee of the Swiss Tax Conference, which all cantonal tax administrations and the Fed- eral Tax Administration are part of. One of the Committee’s aims is to foster relations between tax administrations and taxpayers by providing all interested parties with tax-related information in an objective manner. This should help the general public to have a better understanding of tax issues. Swiss Tax Conference Information Committee The Chairman: Lino Ramelli Bellinzona, June 2019 1 Contents Main features of the Swiss tax system 1 General ................................................................................5 1.1 Development of the tax system ........................................5 1.2 Overview of the introduction and duration of the individual federal taxes, customs duties and contributions ......................................................................... 7 2 Who levies taxes in Switzerland? .....................................9 3 Basic principles of fiscal sovereignty ..............................12 3.1 Principle of equality before the law (art.
  • Religious Tax Exemption and the "Charitable Scrutiny" Test

    Religious Tax Exemption and the "Charitable Scrutiny" Test

    RELIGIOUS TAX EXEMPTION AND THE "CHARITABLE SCRUTINY" TEST I. INTRODUCTION Churches and other religious organizations have enjoyed the benefits of tax exemption in this country since the late nineteenth century. During this time, many American churches have grown, flourished, and garnered both wealth from and favor in society. Tax exemption has become "big business." A study conducted in 1996 concluded that nearly half the country's population donates to a church or other place of worship in any given month.1 A similar study in 2000 showed an increase; now over half (fifty-four percent) of all adults donate to churches in a typical month. 2 When considering donations over an entire year, the figure climbs to seventy-five percent.3 In fact, the majority of all donations made in the United States are directed toward churches and religious causes. According to the American Association of Fund-Raising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy, in 1998 Americans contributed $174.52 billion to charities, directing the lion's share ($76.06 billion), as always, toward religious entities. 4 Many of these donations are undoubtedly made as a result of the preferential tax treatment afforded the gifts.5 While tax-exempt status has long benefited American churches and religious institutions, given the development of modern case law and a changing attitude toward the role that religion plays in American life, churches may not continue to enjoy the benefits of tax exemption. As federal courts develop new (and arguably tenuous) justifications for the existence of religious tax exemptions and begin to condition continuing 1 Press Release, Barna Research Group/Barna Research Online, The Non-Profit Donation: Broad-Based but Meager (June 7, 1996) [hereinafter The Non-Profit Donation] (on file with author).
  • Minister's Tax & Financial Guide – 2021 Edition

    Minister's Tax & Financial Guide – 2021 Edition

    2021 MINISTER’S TAX & FINANCIAL GUIDE Appreciation This guide is a successor edition of a guide originally authored by Dan Busby. The availability of this guide today would not be possible were it not for Dan’s original authorship of it and his improvements to it over the years. ECFA is most grateful for Dan’s vision in creating this resource and for his contribution of its content to ECFA for publication of subsequent editions. ECFA expresses our sincere appreciation to Mr. Michael Batts, CPA, and managing partner, Batts Morrison Wales & Lee, P.A., Orlando, Florida, and the staff of the firm for their valued assistance in reviewing the two sample tax returns included in this guide. 2021 Minister’s Tax and Financial Guide © 2020 by ECFA (Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability) Requests for information should be addressed to: ECFA, 440 West Jubal Early Drive, Suite 100, Winchester, VA 22601 ISBN 978-1-949365-27-6 Publisher’s note: This guide is published in recognition of the need for clarification of the income tax laws for ministers. Every effort has been made to publish a timely, accurate, and authoritative guide. The publisher, author, and reviewers do not assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy of the text or any other contents. Taxpayers are cautioned that this book is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. Readers should seek the professional advice of a tax accountant, lawyer, or preparer for specific tax questions. References to IRS forms and tax rates are derived from preliminary proofs of the 2020 forms or 2019 forms, and some adaptation for changes may be necessary.
  • And on the Seventh Day, God Codified the Religious Tax-Exemption

    And on the Seventh Day, God Codified the Religious Tax-Exemption

    Idaho Law Review Volume 5 Number 1 Concordia Law Review Article 2 April 2021 And on the Seventh Day, God Codified the Religious ax-T Exemption: Reshaping the Modern Code Framework to Achieve Statutory Harmony with Other Charitable Organizations and Prevent Abuse Dominic Rota Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho-law-review Recommended Citation Dominic Rota, And on the Seventh Day, God Codified the Religious ax-ExT emption: Reshaping the Modern Code Framework to Achieve Statutory Harmony with Other Charitable Organizations and Prevent Abuse, 5 IDAHO L. REV. (2021). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho-law-review/vol5/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Idaho Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AND ON THE SEVENTH DAY, GOD CODIFIED THE RELIGIOUS TAX- EXEMPTION: RESHAPING THE MODERN CODE FRAMEWORK TO ACHIEVE STATUTORY HARMONY WITH OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AND PREVENT ABUSE Dominic Rota* INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 57 I. A HISTORY OF RELIGIOUS TAX EXEMPTION .......................................... 62 A. From the Book of Genesis to the Decree of Constantine .............. 63 B. From Early American Society to the Modern Statutory Scheme ...... 65 II. THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF RELIGIOUS TAX EXEMPTION ..................
  • Nicaragua Page 1 of 5

    Nicaragua Page 1 of 5

    Nicaragua Page 1 of 5 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report » Western Hemisphere » Nicaragua Nicaragua BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report Report September 13, 2011 The constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom and, in practice, the government generally enforced these protections. The government generally respected religious freedom in law and in practice. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. The government showed intolerance toward those who commented on sociopolitical matters, including religious groups. There were some reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. The U.S. government discusses religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 49,998 square miles and a population of 5.7 million. More than 80 percent of the population belongs to Christian groups. Roman Catholicism remains the dominant religion. According to the 2005 census by the government's Nicaraguan Institute of Statistics and Census, 58.5 percent of the population was Catholic and 21.6 percent was evangelical Protestant, a category that included Assemblies of God, Pentecostals, Mennonites, and Baptists. An April 2010 public opinion survey from independent private polling firms indicated that 56.2 percent of the population was Catholic and 24.9 percent was evangelical. Both Catholic and evangelical leaders viewed these results as inaccurate.