A Recommendation for a Bicycle Network in Berlin Based on the Guidelines of Copenhagen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Recommendation for a Bicycle Network in Berlin Based on the Guidelines of Copenhagen UNICA Euromaster in Urban Studies 4Cities Etropolszky, Karen Alice Master Thesis 2013 A recommendation for a bicycle network in Berlin based on the guidelines of Copenhagen Supervisor: Fernando Moliní Second reader: Martin Zerlang Submission: September 1st, 2013 Year of defence: 2013 Abstract The following research investigates the cycling infrastructure in Copenhagen and Berlin within the framework of a comparative case study. After identifying the guidelines of the Copenhagen cycling network, the guidelines are applied to Berlin in order to create a bicycle network recommendation. The research questions are the following: How would the city of Berlin develop their cycling infrastructure when following the guidelines of the city of Copenhagen? What are the benefits and disadvantages of cycling? What role does cycling play in a European context? Which factors play a role in cycling behavior? What is the current status of these factors in the two case studies? How can the development guidelines of Copenhagen be applied on the case study of Berlin? The research is both qualitative and quantitative, involving expert interviews and a self-conducted survey with over 400 participants. The final product of the research is a network recommendation for cycling infrastructure in the city of Berlin, comprised of both a more detailed plan for the inner city, and one for the entire city. Acknowledgments The idea for the following research derived from my growing interest in urban mobility. After spending my first winter on a bicycle, I believe that bikes have a significant potential in urban areas and I would like to contribute to the discussion on urban cycling. I would like to thank everyone who in some way or form contributed to making this research possible. I would especially like to thank: My thesis supervisor Fernando Moliní, who guided me through my work and was available at all times, even during holidays for questions and feedback, those participating in my survey and interviews, everyone who contributed to my education and work experience, my parents, without whom I would have not had the opportunity to receive my education, Thomas, for all his time and effort helping me, Gilda and last but not least Mads for the support. Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Research question ...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................1 1.3 Research constraints ...........................................................................................................4 1.3.1 Limitations ...................................................................................................................4 2 The context of cycling .................................................................................................................5 2.1 Developments in Urban Mobility .........................................................................................5 2.2 The benefits of cycling .........................................................................................................6 2.2.1 Health benefits ............................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Environmental benefits ................................................................................................6 2.2.3 Economic benefits .......................................................................................................7 2.2.4 Social benefits ..............................................................................................................7 2.2.5 Transport efficiency benefits ........................................................................................8 2.3 Disadvantages of cycling ......................................................................................................8 2.4 Cycling and the EU ...............................................................................................................8 2.5 Cycling in numbers in the EU ............................................................................................. 10 3 Factors influencing cycling behaviour ........................................................................................ 12 3.1 Factors directly influencing cycling road infrastructure ...................................................... 12 3.1.1 The types of cycling road infrastructure ..................................................................... 12 3.1.1.1 Shared streets and shared lanes ............................................................................. 12 3.1.1.2 Bike lanes ............................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1.3 Separated paths / Cycle tracks ............................................................................... 14 3.1.1.4 Standalone paths ................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Intersection Design and lights .................................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Safety and separation ................................................................................................ 15 3.1.4 Traffic Calming ........................................................................................................... 16 3.1.5 Land use planning ...................................................................................................... 16 3.1.5.1 Density and distances............................................................................................. 16 3.1.5.2 Network density ..................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Other factors ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Bike sharing ............................................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Bicycle parking and security ....................................................................................... 18 3.2.3 Health and social status ............................................................................................. 18 3.2.4 Weather and topology ............................................................................................... 18 3.2.5 Government and policies ........................................................................................... 19 3.2.5.1 Information and Networking .................................................................................. 20 3.2.5.2 Finances ................................................................................................................. 20 4 Case Studies .............................................................................................................................. 21 4.1 Copenhagen ...................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Berlin ................................................................................................................................. 22 4.3 Berlin and Copenhagen in comparison ............................................................................... 23 4.4 Short historic perspective of cycling ................................................................................... 24 4.4.1 Historic perspective Copenhagen ............................................................................... 25 4.4.2 Historic perspective Berlin ......................................................................................... 26 4.5 Share of cycling ................................................................................................................. 27 4.5.1 Share of cycling Copenhagen ..................................................................................... 28 4.5.2 Share of cycling Berlin ................................................................................................ 32 4.6 The types of cycling road infrastructure ............................................................................. 35 4.6.1 Infrastructure Copenhagen ........................................................................................ 35 4.6.1.1 Green waves and lights .......................................................................................... 41 4.6.1.2 Intersection design ................................................................................................. 42 4.6.1.3 Bicycle bridges ....................................................................................................... 43 4.6.2 Infrastructure Berlin................................................................................................... 44 4.7 Safety ................................................................................................................................ 53 4.7.1 Safety Copenhagen .................................................................................................... 53 4.7.2 Safety Berlin .............................................................................................................. 54 4.8 Traffic calming ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 060528 Tramnetz.Pdf
    h Fahrscheine bitte vor Fahrtantritt entwerten. Legende Service MetroTram + Straßenbahn-Netz Tarifbereich Berlin A B C A B Haltestellen in Berlin C Haltestellen in Brandenburg Tickets must be validated before use. 2 S+U-Bahn-Linie mit AB 7 Umsteigemöglichkeit Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) S+U-Bahn + MetroBus-Netz M1 MetroTram-Linie 10773 Berlin 50 Straßenbahn-Linie www.bvg.de - [email protected] imode.bvg.de - wap.bvg.de M19 MetroBus-Linie S Waidmannslust iT M1 Rosenthal Nord B4 50 Guyotstr. < BVG Call Center: (030) 19 44 9 Halt nur in Pfeilrichtung Hauptstr./Friedrich-Engels-Str. Hugenottenplatz Tag und Nacht. Rund um die Uhr. 6 Arnouxstr. f0 b0 Bus-Anbindung zum Flughafen Auch am Wochenende. Wiesenwinkel 8 M21 S+U Wittenau Uhlandstr./ B4 Navarraplatz Fernbahnhof BVG Fahrinfo SMS S Tegel S+U Karl-Bonhoeffer-Nervenklinik Wilhelmsruher Damm Angerweg M1 Schillerstr. Französisch Buchholz Kirche p BVG-Fundbüro Standort-Nr. senden an 77 3 77 S8 Berlin Blankenfelder Str. Nordendstr. Waldemarstr. BVG Fundbüro Uhlandstr. Nordend Rosenthaler Str. Barrierefreier Nahverkehr am U-Bhf Kleistpark/U-Bhf Bülowstr. Potsdamer Str. 182 (nahe Pallasstraße) S Schönholz Platanenstr. Marienstr./Pasewalker Str. uT S Wartenberg B4 B4 MetroTram/Tram Heinrich-Böll-Str. 10783 Berlin (Schöneberg) U6 Skladanowskystr. Kuckhoffstr. Pasewalker Str./Blankenburger Weg bedingt barrierefreie Fahrzeuge u4 (030) 19 44 9 M21 Pastor-Niemöller-Platz U8 H.-Hesse-Str./ Pankower Str. Grabbeallee/Pastor-Niemöller-Platz Waldstr. Galenusstr. S1 S8 S85 B4 Tschaikowskistr. M2 Heinersdorf B4 Zingster Str. M4 M5 StiftswegMendelstr. S Pankow-Heinersdorf M4 M17 Falkenberg B4 S-Bahn Berlin GmbH Bürgerpark Pankow www.s-bahn-berlin.de U Kurt-Schumacher- Würtzstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle-Body-City: Experiences of Urban Cycling in Copenhagen
    Bicycle-Body-City: Experiences of Urban Cycling in Copenhagen Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Research (MRES) Lucinda Libershal Casbolt (BA) Department of Anthropology Macquarie University Sydney, Australia Supervised by Dr Christopher Houston Submitted 9 October 2015 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 4 Statement of Authorship ................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 6 Beginnings ............................................................................................................................ 7 I. Morning Beats .......................................................................................................................... 7 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 III. For Context .......................................................................................................................... 17 Part 1: The Bicycle-Body .............................................................................................. 22 I. Annie .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycling Infrastructure in Denver, Colorado a THESIS
    The Power of Policy Image: Bicycling Infrastructure in Denver, Colorado A THESIS Presented to The Environmental Studies Department The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Environmental Policy By Carter Eng May 2019 ____________________________ Corina McKendry Associate Professor of Political Science ____________________________ Elizabeth Coggins Assistant Professor of Political Science 1 Table of Contents From Toy to Essential Tool in Building a Modern City ................................................... 3 Policy Image and Equilibrium ...................................................................................... 4 The Importance of Bicycling Infrastructure in Cities ...................................................... 9 Denver on Right Path to Implement Bicycle Infrastructure ......................................... 12 The Impact of Policy Image on Cycling Infrastructure Implementation ....................... 14 Denver’s Recent AT Policy Image Success ................................................................... 21 Public Health Framing of Bicycling Infrastructure ....................................................... 28 Denver As a Model for Other Cities ............................................................................ 32 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 33 2 From Toy to Essential Tool in Building a Modern City Bicycling in Denver, and the U.S. more broadly, has made the important
    [Show full text]
  • Towards New Urban Mobility: the Case of London and Berlin
    Towards New Urban Mobility New Towards The case of London and Berlin case of London The Towards New Urban Mobility The case of London and Berlin LSE Cities and InnoZ, 2015 3 3 Research Directors Philipp Rode Executive Director of LSE Cities and Senior Research Fellow, London School of Economics and Political Science London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Christian Hoffmann, Director of User Research, London Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change WC2A 2AE (InnoZ) UK Research Team Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 7706 [email protected] Jens Kandt www.lsecities.net Lead Researcher, LSE Cities Duncan Smith Research Officer, LSE Cities Andreas Graff Researcher, InnoZ Innovation Centre for Mobility and Societal Change (InnoZ) GmbH Support and Advice Torgauer Strasse 12 - 15 Alexandra Gomes, LSE Cities 10829 Berlin Alun Humphrey, National Centre for Social Research Germany Ben Plowden, Transport for London Catarina Heeckt, LSE Cities Tel: +49 (0)30 238884-0 Colin Shepherd, Transport for London [email protected] Florian Lennert, InnoZ www.innoz.de Jillian Anable, University of Aberdeen Joe Stordy, Transport for London Supported by Imke Steinmeyer, Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment Nihan Akyelken, University of Oxford Piotr Fryzlewicz, London School of Economics and Political Science Robert Vollmer, infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences Robin Hickman, University College London Samantha Kennedy, Transport for London Thorsten Brand, infas Institute for Applied Social Sciences Production and Graphic Design Peter Griffiths Managing Editor, LSE Cities Atelier Works www.atelierworks.co.uk This Report is intended as a basis for discussion. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material in this report, the authors and/or LSE Cities will not be liable for any loss or damage incurred through the use of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Travel Program Student Guidebook – Berlin
    Student Travel Program Student Guidebook – Berlin Prepare to Fly 2 ​ Packing 2 ​ Work Attire 2 ​ Useful Items 2 ​ Phone & WiFi 2 ​ SIM Cards 2 ​ Useful Apps 2 ​ Arrival in Berlin 3 ​ Getting To Us 3 ​ Landing 3 ​ From Tegel (TXL) 3 ​ From Schönefeld (SXF) 4 ​ From Berlin Central Station/Hauptbahnhof 5 ​ Public Transportation 6 ​ Using the BVG 6 ​ Ticketing 6 ​ Alternative Modes of Transportation 7 ​ Staying in Berlin 7 ​ Housing 7 ​ Food/Shopping 7 ​ Food/Groceries 7 ​ Drug Store/Misc Items 7 ​ Clothing 8 ​ Money/Banking 8 ​ Cash vs. Card 8 ​ Tipping 8 ​ Travel Notifications 8 ​ Ick bin ein Berliner! – In and Around Berlin 8 ​ Berlin Culture – How to Act like a Berliner 8 ​ A Random Collection of Tips for Life in Berlin 8 ​ Sightseeing 10 ​ Restaurants/Bars 10 ​ Nightlife 11 ​ Neighborhoods 11 ​ Day Trip/Weekend Destinations 12 ​ Team 12 ​ Contact/Help/FAQs 12 ​ 1 Prepare to Fly Here we provide a few tips on how to get ready for your trip to Berlin and a few things to keep in mind before you fly. Packing Work Attire The office dress code is very casual – jeans, a comfy sweater or t-shirt are more than acceptable. We also are big fans of walking around in slippers or socks! Beyond office-wear, Berlin style is very diverse, fashionable and functional. You can honestly wear whatever you like – no one will look twice. Clubbing style is also extremely casual. You’d be more likely turned away from a club for dressing up too much instead of dressing ​ ​ down. So don’t stress about bringing a selected wardrobe – dress how you feel comfortable, and bring layers for weather readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Reach Us
    THE CONVENTION CENTER IN THE CAPITAL HOW TO REACH US. Car from all directions: keep going towards Berlin-Mitte • from the direction of the A24 and A19: Leave the A10 at the Pankow junction and follow the A114 until you reach the Pankow exit. Continue towards Berlin ‚Zentrum/ Mitte‘ until you reach the ‚Prenzlauer Allee‘, which becomes ‚Karl- Liebknecht-Strasse‘ (B2/B5). Turn right into the ‚Spandauer Strasse‘ and after approx. 200 m turn left into the ‚Anna-Louisa-Karsch Strasse‘. The main entrance is on the Spree embankment. There is a public car-park at Spandauer Strasse 3. • from the direction of the A2 and A9: Leave the A10 at the Nuthetal junction and follow the A115 towards Berlin ‚Zentrum‘. At the Funkturm junction drive towards ‚Hamburg/Flughafen Tegel‘ and leave the motorway at the ‚Kaiserdamm‘ exit, towards ‚Berlin-Mitte/Tiergarten‘. Follow the ‚Strasse des 17. Juni‘ and turn right just before the ‚Brandenburger Tor‘. Then turn left into the ‚Behrenstrasse‘ as far as the ‚Glinkastrasse‘ and turn left. Turn right at the next crossroads into ‚Unter den Linden‘. This street becomes the ‚Karl-Liebknecht Strasse‘ (B2/B5). Turn left into the ‚Spandauer Strasse‘ and after approx. 200 Fraunhofer-Forum Berlin m left into the ‚Anna-Louisa-Karsch Strasse‘. The main entrance is Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2 on the Spree embankment. There is a public car-park at Spandauer 10178 Berlin Strasse 3. Phone: +49 89 1205-5013 • from the direction of the A13: [email protected] From the Schönefelder junction follow the A113 towards ‚Berlin- www.forum.fraunhofer.de Grünau / Dreieck Treptow‘.
    [Show full text]
  • BERLIN to Go
    EDITION Nº 02/2017 BERLIN to go BUSINESS NEWS TO TAKE AWAY IN THE NEWS: CITY OF FREEDOM CREATIVE INDUSTRIES STARTUP SCENE #FREIHEITBERLIN Mehr als eine Heizung. Ein Heizsystem mit Zukunft. solide modular vernetzt Die Heizsysteme der Titanium Linie sind immer eine wegweisende Systemlösung. Hochwertige Materialien und intelligente Produktdetails sorgen für eine besondere Langlebigkeit und Energieeffi zienz. Ihr modularer Aufbau ermöglicht zukünftige Erweiterungen und ihre Vernetzung über das Internet garantiert Ihnen eine komfortable Bedienung auch von unterwegs – mit dem Buderus Control Center Connect. www.buderus.de/zukunft Die Klassifi zierung zeigt die Energieeffi zienz des Buderus Systems bestehend aus Logamax plus GBH192iT150S PNR400, Systembedieneinheit Logamatic RC300 plus 4 Stück Flachkollektoren Logasol SKT 1.0. Die Klassifi zierung kann je nach Komponenten oder Leistungsgrößen eventuell abweichen. Bosch Thermotechnik GmbH · Buderus Deutschland · www.buderus.de Bessemerstr. 76A Berliner Straße 1 12103 Berlin 16727 Velten Tel.: 030/75488-0 Tel.: 03304/377-0 [email protected] [email protected] Am Magnapark 4 Feldmark 9 Hansestr. 5 14542 Werder OT Plötzin 17034 Neubrandenburg 18182 Bentwisch Tel.: 03327/5749-110 Tel.: 0395/4534-201 Tel.: 0381/60969-12 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] BUD_AZ_Mehr als eine Heizung_A4.indd 1 17.02.17 14:42 EDITORIAL LEGAL NOTICE DEAR READER, BERLIN to go Berlin is the city of freedom – a place where creativity, entrepre- BUSINESS NEWS TO TAKE AWAY neurial spirit and joie de vivre determine the rhythm. Artists, designers, musicians and filmmakers from all over the world is a Berlin Partner publication value Berlin as a stage, as an inspiration and as a city where Publisher: creativity can be lived without any limitation.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Cycling Agenda for the City of Toronto
    EMERGING URBANISl\l AND CYCLING DEVELOPMENT A NEW CYCLING AGENDA FOR THE CITY OF TORONTO By: Jennifer J. Laforest Bachelor of Applied Arts (BAA) Interior Design, Algonquin College 2008 A Major Research Paper Presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Planning tn Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010 © Jennifer J. Laforest 2010 PROPfHTY UF RYERSON UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this major research paper. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this paper by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. - {Laforest, 2010) .. The right to the city cannot be conceived ofas a simple visiting right or as a return to traditional cities. It can only beformulated and renewed right to urban life." - Henri Lefebvre 3 (Laforest, 2010) EXf'clItin Summary This rt'port titled Emerging Urbanism and Cycling Development - a New Cycling Agendafor the City of Toronto is assembled to infoffil a comprehensive cycling program for the City of Toronto. It offers an assemhly of secondary research to help construct long-term cycling strategy in Toronto based on new urban I.heories as well as a thorough understanding of opportunities particular to the City of Toronto. The assembly of secondary research for this report was researched over a period of a year and assembled in partial completion of graduate training in urban development at Ryerson University in Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle-Safety-Evidence-Received.Pdf
    Written submissions received for the Transport Committee’s investigation into cycle safety in London Contents: Dr Rachel Aldred, University of East London 1 Brake 2 Brighton & Hove City Council 10 British Cycling 11 City of Copenhagen 14 Croydon Cycling Campaign 17 Cycxi Ltd 18 Cycling Buddy 20 Cycling Embassy of Great Britain 21 Dr Robert Davis, London Boroughs Cycling Officers Group Delegate 36 Dutch Cycling Embassy 46 The Freight Transport Association 48 Headway 50 Hounslow Cyclists 54 Kingston Cyclists 57 Kingston Upon Hull 60 London Borough of Croydon 61 London Borough of Ealing 62 London Borough of Hackney 66 London Borough of Hillingdon 74 London Borough of Southwark 76 London Councils 85 London Cycling Campaign 94 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 118 London TravelWatch 119 Metropolitan Police Service 145 Professor Parkin, South Bank University 149 Road Danger Reduction Forum 152 Road Haulage Association 163 Road Peace 168 Royal Borough of Greenwich 175 SRAM 179 Southwark Cyclists, RoadPeace and Southwark Living Streets 180 Cllr Vincent Stops, London Borough of Hackney 217 Sustrans 223 Transport for London 243 Wellington City Council 250 Wheels for Wellbeing 252 Peter Wood, Open University 262 Dr James Woodcock Cambridge 267 GLA investigation into cycling in London Written submission from Dr. Rachel Aldred, Director, University of East London Sustainable Mobilities Research Group, 24/07/2012 I am a sociologist focusing on sustainable transport. I have recently directed several relevant projects. One is Cycling Cultures, a two year Economic and Social Research Council funded project, looking at experiences of cycling in four relatively high-cycling English urban areas (see www.cyclingcultures.org.uk/).
    [Show full text]
  • • (OP1 Si ,C1-R"T .L.A%
    AIR MG —A— (A %-1 ) Chief, Foreign Division oll" 24 August 1951 . / Chief of . Station, Karlsruhe Operational. IPastime\Facilities Attached for use when star-behind operations are initiated, are two enclosures indicating restaurants and outdoor meeting points suitable for agent contacts. These have been provided by J. should be kept on file in Washington only. C DECLASS IF I ED AND RELEASED BY CENTRAL I NTELL IS ENCE AGENCY SOURCES METHOOSEX EHPT ION MO NAZI WAR CR IMES 01 SCLODURrADL.,,, DATE 20 07 • P'J! U1E104a___, t7.7 77; o Distributiont 2 - FDA (w/attach) 1 - COS 1 - BOB • (OP1 si ,C1-r"T .L.A% POINTS IN BERLIN SUITABLF, FOR OUTDOOR mtEmlis 1. Berlin-Britz Telephone booth in front of Post Office on the corner of . Chaussee Strasse and Tempelhofer Weg. 2. Berlin-Charlottenburg Streetcar stop for the line towards Charlottenburg in front Of S-Bahnhof Westend.. 3. Berlin-Friedenau Telephone booth on the corner of Handjery Strasse and Isolde Strasse (Maybach Platz). 4. Berlin-Friedrichsfelde Pillar used for posters on the corner of Schloss StrasSe and Wilhelm Strasse. 5. .Berlin=Friedrichshain Streetcar stop for line 65 in the direction of Lichtenberg located on Lenin Platz. 6. Derlin-Grffnau Final stop for bus lines A 36 and 38 in Grffnau. 7. Berlin-Gruneuald Ticket counter in S-Bahnhof Halensee. 8. Berlin-Heinersdorf Pillar used for posters on the corner of Stiftsweg and Dreite Strasse. 9. Berlin-Hermsdorf Ticket counter located inside S-Bahnhof Hermsdorf. 10. Berlin-Lankuitz Pillar used for posters on the corner of Marienfelde Strasse and Emmerich Strasse.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Inspiration Personal Experiences from Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands Bicycle Transportation Inspiration
    bicycle transportation inspiration Personal experiences from Denmark, Sweden, and The Netherlands Bicycle Transportation Inspiration The reflections and insights in this publication are first-person accounts of the following students, who visited Denmark, Sweden, and The Netherlands to explore how cities can be improved to make cycling a more integral part of daily life. Daniel Chibbaro Rutgers University Samuel Copelan University of Oregon Sydney Herbst University of Oregon Holly Hixon University of Oregon Kirsten Jones University of Delaware Patrick Kelsey Tufts University Emily Kettell University of Oregon Christina Lane University of Oregon Kyle Meyer University of Oregon Jared Morford Iowa State University Heather Murphy University of Colorado Denver Olivia Offutt California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Hank Phan California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Myra Tetteh University of Michigan Emily Thomason Virginia Commonwealth University Bradley Tollison California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Jody Trendler University of Texas, Austin Xao Xiong University of Oregon Yazmin Valdez-Torres Florida State University Dr. Marc Schlossberg University of Oregon, Professor Adam Beecham Program Coordinator 2015 Bicycle Transportation Field Seminar hosted by the University of Oregon Bicycle Transportation Inspiration, copyright 2016 The Bicycle Transportation Planning Class There is something inexplicably happy-making about being on a bike, feeling safe and comfortable doing so, and being joined in the endeavor by thousands of others at all times of day in all locations in a city every day of the year. It is a feeling one can only get through experience, and if you want to have that feeling of freedom on a bike, visiting cities in Denmark and the Netherlands are a great way to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Claiming the Responsivity Gap: the Co-Creation of Cycling Policies In
    Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 8 (2020) 100270 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trip Re-claiming the responsivity gap: The co-creation of cycling policies in Berlin’s mobility law ⇑ Dirk von Schneidemesser a, ,1, Jeremias Herberg a,b,2, Dorota Stasiak a a Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Potsdam, Germany b Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University, The Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Calls for more bicycle use have been heard from across the political spectrum in Germany for years. Cycling Nonetheless, policies that lead to a transition away from car use and toward the bicycle in urban mobility Case study remain absent. Against this background, we explore a mode of citizen engagement in the policy process in Policy which citizens take the initiative and claim a political space to include their user expertise in the policy process. Citizen participation The case is a recent development in the field of urban mobility in Berlin, Germany in which citizen activists Germany directly integrated citizen knowledge into policy outcomes. This was enabled by claiming the political space and thereby determining the spectrum of possibility, ultimately leading to an unprecedented process of co‐ creative legislation that marked a unique shift in German mobility policy, with the result that Berlin became the first German state to pass a bicycle law in June of 2018. We argue that the political space these citizens claimed was a key factor for enabling policy change, as previous attempts in invited political spaces had not led to a departure from the status quo.
    [Show full text]