DOCSLIB.ORG

Be-206 Austria's National Inventory Report 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Be-206 Austria's National Inventory Report 2002 BE-206 AUSTRIA’S NATIONAL INVENTORY REPORT 2002 Submission under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2002 AUSTRIA’S NATIONAL INVENTORY REPORT 2002 Submission under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2002 BE-206 Vienna, October 2002 Authors Marion GANGL Andreas HRABAL Günther LICHTBLAU Stephan POUPA Klaus RADUNSKY Manfred RITTER Elisabeth WAITZ Peter WEISS Manuela WIESER ǖsa WINKLER Weitere Informationen zu Publikationen des Umweltbundesamtes finden Sie unter: http:/www.ubavie.gv.at Impressum Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Lände 5, A-1090 Wien Eigenvervielfältigung © Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Wien, Oktober 2002 Alle Rechte vorbehalten (all rights reserved) ISBN 3-85457- 645-5 Austria´s National Inventory Report 2002 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As a Party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Austria is required to produce and regularly update National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. To date, National Greenhouse Gas Inventories have been produced for the years 1990 to 2000. By taking decision 3/CP.5 (see document FCCC/CP/1999/6/Add.1) the Conference of the Parties (COP) has undertaken to implement the UNFCCC guidelines on reporting and re- viewing (FCCC/CP/1999/7). According to this decision Parties shall submit a National Inven- tory Report (NIR) containing detailed and complete information on their inventories, in order to ensure the transparency of the inventory (See paragraph 32 of FCCC/CP/1999/7). This is the second version of the National Inventory Report (NIR) submitted by Austria. This version is an update of the NIR submitted in 2001 taking into account several comments made by two expert review teams (Austria’s GHG inventory submission 2001 was reviewed during an in-country review and by a centralized review). The structure of the NIR has also been changed and follows quite closely the proposal as in- cluded in Annex I of document FCCC/SBSTA/2002/Add.2. There are 5 chapters (Chapter 1: Introduction-General Issues, Chapter 2: Trend in GHG Emissions, Chapter 3: Key Sources; Chapter 4: Sector Analysis and Chapter 5: Improvement Program) as well as an executive summary. Abbreviations and references used are also included as well as the emissions for the year 2000 as included in the tables of the common reporting format. It is the intention of this report to better understand the calculation of the Austrian GHG emis- sion data. Those who want to know more details will have to consult the background litera- ture cited in this document. The preparation and review of Austria’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory as well as the preparation of the NIR is the responsibility of the Department of Emissions/Climate Protec- tion/Noise Abatement of the Federal Environment Agency. The project leaders have been: Klaus Radunsky and Manfred Ritter Specific responsibilities for the NIR 2002 have been as follows: Executive Summary Klaus Radunsky Chapter 1.1 Marion Gangl Chapter 1.2 Elisabeth Waitz Chapter 1.3 Andreas Hrabal Chapter 1.4 Elisabeth Waitz Chapter 1.5 Andreas Hrabal Chapter 1.6 Stephan Poupa Chapter 2 Åsa Winkler Chapter 3 Elisabeth Waitz Chapter 4.1 Stephan Poupa Chapter 4.2 Åsa Winkler Chapter 4.3 Stephan Poupa Chapter 4.4 Elisabeth Waitz Chapter 4.5 Peter Weiss 4 Austria´s National Inventory Report 2002 Chapter 4.6 Åsa Winkler Chapter 5 Andreas Hrabal Manuela Wieser was responsible for the finalization of the NIR. The Austrian Federal Environment Agency expresses its thanks and appreciation to the pro- ject leaders for their contributions and cooperative effort in producing a national methodology and emission inventory of high quality. Contributors to the development of methodologies have been acknowledged in the respective sections of the Sector Analysis of the NIR. Austria´s National Inventory Report 2002 Introduction – General Issues 5 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION – GENERAL ISSUES...........................................................7 1.1 Institutional Arrangement for Inventory Preparation..............................................7 1.1.1 Austria’s Obligations ....................................................................................................7 1.1.2 History of NISA.............................................................................................................8 1.1.3 Adaptation of NISA according to the Kyoto Protocol....................................................8 1.2 Inventory Preparation Process ...............................................................................11 1.2.1 The CORINAIR System..............................................................................................11 1.2.2 General Methods Used ..............................................................................................12 1.2.3 Main Data Suppliers...................................................................................................13 1.2.4 Data Management......................................................................................................13 1.2.5 Reporting....................................................................................................................13 1.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) ..................................................13 1.3.1 Quality Management System (QMS)..........................................................................14 1.3.2 Inspection bodies .......................................................................................................16 1.3.3 Accreditation Act ........................................................................................................16 1.3.4 Implementation of QA/QC ..........................................................................................17 1.3.5 Treatment of confidentiality issues.............................................................................18 1.4 Uncertainty Assessment .........................................................................................18 1.4.1 First comprehensive uncertainty analysis ..................................................................18 1.4.2 Procedure...................................................................................................................20 1.5 Completeness...........................................................................................................21 1.5.1 Sources and sinks......................................................................................................21 1.5.2 Gases.........................................................................................................................21 1.5.3 Geographic coverage.................................................................................................21 1.5.4 Notation keys..............................................................................................................21 1.6 Recalculations..........................................................................................................22 1.6.1 Preamble....................................................................................................................22 1.6.2 Recalculation of National Total ..................................................................................23 1.6.3 Recalculation of CO2 Emissions by Categories .........................................................24 1.6.4 Recalculation of CH4 Emissions by Categories..........................................................25 1.6.5 Recalculation of N2O Emissions by Categories .........................................................26 1.6.6 Recalculation of HFC Emissions by Categories.........................................................27 1.6.7 Recalculation of PFC Emissions by Categories.........................................................27 1.6.8 Recalculation of SF6 Emissions by Categories ..........................................................27 2 TREND IN TOTAL EMISSIONS.....................................................................29 2.1 Emission Trends for aggregated GHG emissions in CO2 equivalents................29 6 Austria´s National Inventory Report 2002 Introduction – General Issues 2.2 Emission Trends by gas for GHG emissions ........................................................30 2.3 Emission Trends by sources for GHG emissions.................................................32 2.4 Emission Trends for indirect GHG and SO2...........................................................34 3 KEY SOURCES .............................................................................................37 3.1 Austria’s key source categories .............................................................................37 3.2 Description of methodology used for identifying key source categories...........39 3.2.1 Level of disaggregation and identification of key source categories ..........................40 3.2.2 Level Assessment 1990 and 2000 .............................................................................40 3.2.3 Trend Assessment 1990 to 2000 ...............................................................................40 3.2.4 Identification of key source categories .......................................................................40 3.3 Consequences of key source category selection .................................................41 4 SECTOR ANALYSIS......................................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changes in Family Policies and Outcomes: Is There Convergence?
    OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 157 Changes in Family Policies Willem Adema, and Outcomes: Is there Nabil Ali, Convergence? Olivier Thévenon https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz13wllxgzt-en For Official Use DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2014)3 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE For Official Use Official For DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2014)3 OECD SOCIAL, EMPLOYMENT AND MIGRATION WORKING PAPERS No. 157 Changes in family policies and outcomes: is there convergence? Willem Adema, Nabil Ali and Olivier Thévenon JEL Classification: D1 (Household Behavior and Family Economics), J12 (Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure), J13 (Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth), J18 (Demographic economics – public policy) Key words: Family and Child outcomes, Female Employment, Taxes and Benefits, Child Care and Parental Leave. Authorised for publication by Stefano Scarpetta, Director, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. All Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers are now available through the OECD website at www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers English Complete document available on OLIS in its original format - This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of Or. English international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2014)3 DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS www.oecd.org/els OECD SOCIAL, EMPLOYMENT AND MIGRATION WORKING PAPERS www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads Area (On the Reforestation
    FSC National Risk Assessment For Austria DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-AT V1-0 National approval National decision body: Technical project group for CWRA (hosted by FSC Germany) Date: 08.11.2017 International approval FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date: 03 April 2018 International contact Name: Ulrich Malessa Email address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 03 April 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Germany – Verein für verantwortungsvolle maintenance Waldwirtschaft e.V. FSC-NRA-AT V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR AUSTRIA 2018 – 1 of 112 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Austria ......................................................... 3 Background information .............................................................................................................. 4 What do we mean by FSC Controlled Wood? ..................................................................... 4 Why is the risk assessment necessary?.............................................................................. 4 Proceeding in a participatory process ................................................................................. 5 Timeline for the approval of the Austrian FSC risk assessment .......................................... 5 Structure of the document ................................................................................................... 8 Evaluation and control
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Beyond Parties
    Center for the Study of Democracy (University of California, Irvine) Year Paper - Democracy Beyond Parties Peter Mair Leiden University, The Netherlands This paper is posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/05-06 Copyright c 2005 by the author. Democracy Beyond Parties Abstract This paper is concerned primarily with the way in which the changing char- acter of political parties impacts upon their standing, legitimacy, and effective- ness. We see an emerging notion of democracy that is being steadily stripped of its popular component–a notion of democracy without a demos. As I try to show in this paper, much of this has to do with the failings of political parties. I am not suggesting that there has been a wholesale failure of parties; rather, I am seeking to draw attention to an ongoing process in which there are party failings, and in which democracy itself tends to adapt and change to these fail- ings. This process then provokes its own momentum, in which parties become steadily weaker, and in which democracy becomes even more stripped down. CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu This paper derives from a wider project on the politics of popular democracy, and is concerned primarily with the way in which the changing character of political parties impacts upon their standing, legitimacy, and effectiveness.1 The argument that is developed here owes much to that originally advanced by E.E. Schattschneider in The Semi-Sovereign People (1960) and to his contention that control over political decision-making sometimes lay beyond the reach of the ordinary citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Natura 2000 Co-Financing
    ASSESSMENT OF THE NATURA 2000 CO-FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS OF THE EU FINANCING INSTRUMENT A project for the European Commission Noo070307/2010/567338/ETU/F1 March 2011 FINAL REPORT M. Kettunen, O. Carter, S. Gantioler & D. Baldock (IEEP) P. Torkler, A. Arroyo Schnell, A. Baumueller & E. Gerritsen (WWF) M. Rayment, E. Daly & M. Pieterse (GHK) Citation and disclaimer This report should be quoted as follows: Kettunen, M., Baldock D., Gantioler, S., Carter, O., Torkler, P., Arroyo Schnell, A., Baumueller, A., Gerritsen, E., Rayment, M., Daly, E. & Pieterse, M. 2011. Assessment of the Natura 2000 co-financing arrangements of the EU financing instrument. A project for the European Commission – final report. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, Belgium. 138 pp + Annexes. The contents and views contained in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission. The Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) is an independent institute with its own research programmes. Based in London and Brussels, the Institute’s major focus is the development, implementation and evaluation of EU policies of environmental significance, including agriculture, fisheries, regional development and transport. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Conclusions of the Trends II Analysis
    Towards the European higher education area : survey of main reforms from Bologna to Prague Summary and conclusions Guy HAUG and Christian TAUCH Review of structures and trends in the countries not covered in 1999 in the Trends 1 report Trends 1 was mainly based on a survey of structure and trends in higher education in the EU/EEA countries. Trends 2 surveyed the other signatory countries of the Bologna Declaration. This review: - confirms all the main conclusions reached in the Trends 1 report; - reinforces the observation concerning the move towards a two-tier system, but not necessarily corresponding to the definitions used for the degree structure outlined in the Bologna Declaration (e.g. the notions of "postgraduate" or "binary" system of higher education); - confirms the observation concerning the move towards accreditation; - shows that long study programmes at all levels, and rather inflexible mono- disciplinary curricula still exist in several countries and would need to be adjusted to meet the principles of the Bologna Declaration. The follow-up process to the Bologna Declaration: widespread interest and support - The Bologna Declaration is on all agendas: all countries have established a unit or a forum to explain and discuss its content and implications. It serves as a new source of dialogue between Ministries and higher education institutions, and between sub-sectors of higher education; - It is mostly seen as confirming/reinforcing national priorities: this is the process' biggest strength, i.e. it "crystallises" major trends and reveals that issues and solutions have a European dimension; as a consequence the process is not (or no longer) seen as an intrusion, but as a source of information on the most suitable way forward for Europe; - It has been used to accelerate, facilitate and guide change: the main role of the Declaration has become to serve as a long term agenda for structural change; - A major strength of the process is its complementarity with other developments in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe
    DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY AND INTERVENTION BARNETT PAPERS IN SOCIAL RESEARCH Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe Co-ordinating authors: Stuart Basten (University of Oxford), Tomas Frejka (University of Oxford) Contributing authors: Liga Abolina (University of Latvia), Liili Abuladze (Estonian Interuniversity Population Research Centre), Svitlina Aksyonova (Mykhailo Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Research, Kiev), AnĎelko Akrap (University of Zagreb), Ekaterina Antipova (Belarusian State University), Mirjana Bobic (University of Belgrade), Ivan Čipin (University of Zagreb), Liudmila Fakeyeva (Belarusian State University), Ionut Foldes (Babes-Bolyai University), Aiva Jasilioniene (MPIDR), Dora Kostova (MPIDR), Irena Kotowska (Warsaw School of Economics), Boris Krimer (Mykhailo Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Research, Kiev), Elena von der Lippe (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin), Iryna Kurylo (Mykhailo Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Research, Kiev), Ausra Maslauskaite (Demographic Research Centre of Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas), Julia Mikolai (University of Liverpool), Cornelia Muresan (Babes-Bolyai University), Vasic Petar (University of Belgrade), Michaela Potančoková (Vienna Institute of Demography), Tatyana Pronko (UNFPA in Belarus), Allan Puur (Estonian Interuniversity Population Research Centre), Mirjana Rasevic (Institute of Social Sciences), Anna Rybińska (Warsaw School of Economics), Luule Sakkeus (Estonian Interuniversity Population Research Centre), Jože Sambt (University
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Marin, Dalia Working Paper The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Munich Discussion Paper, No. 2010-14 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Munich, Department of Economics Suggested Citation: Marin, Dalia (2010) : The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany, Munich Discussion Paper, No. 2010-14, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, München, http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.11435 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/104307 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Dalia Marin: The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Munich Discussion Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Fertility in Europe
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND mono- graphs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. BACK PAGE COPY TO BE SUPPLIED Low fertility in Europe The aftermath of the economic crisis of 2008 has undone much of the progress on improving employment and growth in Europe over the last 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria, Finland and Sweden in the European Union
    SMALL COUNTRIES IN THE INTERNAL MARKET Fritz Breuss Austria, Finland and Sweden in the European Union Economic Effects EU integration has made rapid progress over the past decade. After establishing the Internal Market in 1993, the EU achieved the highest possible level of economic integration in 1999 by completing the eco- nomic and monetary union (EMU) with the introduction of the euro as the common currency. Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the EU in 1995, but Sweden is not yet participating in EMU. Against this back- ground, the present article analyses economic developments in these three member states and, using an integration model, sets out to estimate the respective macro-economic effects of EU membership. The re- sults suggest that Finland has benefited most from accession to the EU, ahead of Austria and Sweden. Fritz Breuss is an economist at WIFO and Jean Monnet professor at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (Research Institute for European Affairs). The author is grateful to Wolfgang Pollan and Michael Wüger for useful and constructive comments. The data were processed and analysed with the assistance of Christine Kaufmann • E-Mail-addresses: [email protected], [email protected] In the fourth round of enlargement, Finland, Austria and Sweden joined the Euro- pean Union on 1 January, 1995, bringing the number of member states to 15. The new members were all "rich" countries, whereas in the two preceding rounds with Greece (1981) and Portugal and Spain (1986) "poor" countries had acceded to the EU. The accession process of the most recent round lasted between three and over five years, counting from the submission of the request for EU membership (Austria 17 July 1989, Finland 18 March 1992, Sweden 1 July 1991; Norway 25 November 1992, Switzerland 20 May 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany
    Marin, Dalia: The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Munich Discussion Paper No. 2010-14 Department of Economics University of Munich Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Online at https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.11435 The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20 - Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Dalia Marin University of Munich and Bruegel September 2009 2 Abstract Many people in the European Union fear that Eastern Enlargement leads to major job losses. More recently, these fears about job losses have extended to high skill labor and IT jobs. The paper examines with unique firm level data whether these fears are justified for the two neighboring countries of Eastern Enlargement Austria and Germany. We find that Eastern Enlargement leads to surprising small job losses of less than 0.5 percent of total employment in Germany and of 1.5 percent in Austria, because jobs in Eastern Europe do not compete with jobs in Austria and Germany. Low cost jobs of affiliates in Eastern Europe help Austrian and German firms to stay competitive in an increasingly competitive environment. However, we also find that multinational firms in Austria and Germany are outsourcing skill intensive activities to Eastern Europe taking advantage of cheap abundant skilled labor there. We find that the firms’ outsourcing activities to Eastern Europe are a response to a human capital scar- city in Austria and Germany which has become particularly severe in the 1990s. We indeed find a reverse pattern of ‘Maquiladoras’ emerging with Eastern Enlargement in Austria and Germany compared to what economists have found for the North American Free Trade Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: the Case of the Anti-Temelín Campaign*
    ONDŘEJ CÍSAŘ Masaryk University, Brno Internationalization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: The Case of the Anti-Temelín Campaign* Abstract: The article analyzes different types of coalition formations that were established and hoped to be established during the transnationally coordinated campaign against the second Czech nuclear power plant in Temelín. The case study concentrates on the role the EU played in the campaign. Due to the ongoing accession process, the opponents of the power plant viewed this process as a unique opportunity for halting the plant’s construction. They actively lobbied the European Commission to make the Czech Republic’s accession to the EU conditional on discontinuing the construction. The perceived significance of the EU explains the political strategies the opponents developed at the end of the 1990s, in order to persuade the European Commission to become involved in the campaign. Keywords: transnational contention, social movements, international institutions, European Union, coali- tion, conflict, nuclear energy, Temelín. Introduction Transnational social movement organizations have recently become a major research problem in the study of social movements. The process of trans-nationalization, es- pecially in the framework of the so-called political process model, has been subject to special scholarly attention (see Tarrow 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; Imig and Tarrow 2001; Imig 2004; della Porta and Tarrow 2005; Tarrow 2005). The authors working within the tradition of the political process model have developed a sophisticated set of the- oretical concepts that has made it possible to explain the timing of the mobilization and the demobilization of social movements, the strategies movements employ and, to a certain extent, the political influence movements are capable of exerting (Kriesi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Payment Systems in the Euro Area
    Payment systems in the euro area Euro area Table of contents List of abbreviations............................................................................................................................... 73 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 75 1. Institutional aspects ..................................................................................................................... 76 1.1 The general institutional background ................................................................................ 76 The Settlement Finality Directive (SFD)............................................................................ 77 The Cross-Border Credit Transfers Directive.................................................................... 77 The E-money Directive...................................................................................................... 78 The Investment Services Directive.................................................................................... 78 The Regulation on cross-border payments in euros ......................................................... 78 1.2 The role of the Eurosystem ............................................................................................... 79 1.2.1 Payment systems oversight.................................................................................... 79 1.2.2 Activities in the area of securities clearing and settlement systems......................
    [Show full text]