DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Practice Guidelines for Management Planning in NATURA 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Practice Guidelines for Management Planning in NATURA 2000 Co-financed by the European Union M.Sc. Programme “Management of Protected Areas” Best practice guidelines for management planning in NATURA 2000 Author: Mgr. Ján Černecký Supervisor: Joanna Borg B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. Carried out at: Department of Economics University of Klagenfurt Universitaetsstrasse 65-67 9020 Klagenfurt Ph +43 (0) 463/ 27 00 4192 e-mail: [email protected] Klagenfurt, May 2011 Citation: J. CERNECKY: BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT PLANNING IN NATURA 2000, KLAGENFURT, 2011, P. 94 MGR . JÁN Č ERNECKÝ DECLARATION OF HONOUR I herewith declare that I am the sole author of the current master thesis according to art. 51 par. 2 no. 8 and art. 51 par. 2 no. 13 Universitätsgesetz 2002 (Austrian University Law) and that I have conducted all works connected with the master thesis on my own. Furthermore, I declare that I only used those resources that are referenced in the work. All formulations and concepts taken from printed, verbal or online sources – be they word-for-word quotations or corresponding in their meaning – are quoted according to the rules of good scientific conduct and are indicated by footnotes, in the text or other forms of detailed references. Support during the work including significant supervision is indicated accordingly. The master thesis has not been presented to any other examination authority. The work has been submitted in printed and electronic form. I herewith confirm that the electronic form is completely congruent with the printed version. I am aware of legal consequences of a false declaration of honor. Klagenfurt, 10 May 2011 Signature: PAGE 2 MGR . JÁN Č ERNECKÝ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing the thesis is very interesting part for every person in his/her life and it is important life step for the future personal progress. There are many people directly or indirectly involved in the process of preparation and writing the thesis and it is important to thank them. I would like to thank especially to my supervisor MSc. Joanna Borg for helping me to complete this thesis and make some good progress in it, to provide me with best ideas and comments. Understanding and accepting new approaches, especially in nature conservancy is very difficult and long process and I would like to thank; Michael Jungmeier, Michael Getzner and all others who prepared and are actually running the Management of protected areas master and provided opportunity with unique experience and lot of knowledge. I would like to thank also WWF for their support in my studies and State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic for allowing me to participate on all courses. IT tool for management measures and online survey would not be finished without help of my colleagues and friends Ján Snopko and Stanislav Motyčka, therefore I would like to thank them as well. Filling up surveys and questionnaires was important for my results and I would like to thank to the national experts for filling up online survey and for the precious time dedicated to fill it. My special thanks goes to my little daughter Sofia and my wife Ľudmila for their understanding and emotional support in hard times where I tried to fulfill all stressful deadlines and could not dedicate much time to them. PAGE 3 MGR . JÁN Č ERNECKÝ Table of Contents Declaration of Honour .............................................................................2 Acknowledgements .................................................................................3 1 Summary ...........................................................................................6 2 Introduction ......................................................................................7 2.1 NATURA 2000 and actual situation in management planning........................... 7 2.1.1 Actual international legislation support for NATURA 2000 management planning .................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 NATURA 2000.................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Actual situation in NATURA 2000 ........................................................ 10 2.1.4 Management planning....................................................................... 14 3 Objectives and purpose ................................................................... 23 4 Methods........................................................................................... 24 4.1 Literature overview and survey methodology.............................................. 24 4.2 IT tool for management measures methodology ......................................... 26 4.3 Guidelines methodology .......................................................................... 26 5 Results............................................................................................. 27 5.1 Management planning in NATURA 2000 in selected Member States................ 27 5.1.1 Management planning in Germany...................................................... 27 5.1.2 Management planning in Poland ......................................................... 28 5.1.3 Management planning in UK (Wales)................................................... 31 5.1.4 Management planning in Hungary....................................................... 32 5.1.5 Management planning in Denmark...................................................... 33 5.1.6 Management planning in Romania ...................................................... 34 5.1.7 Management planning in Slovakia....................................................... 36 5.1.8 Management planning in Netherlands.................................................. 38 5.1.9 Management planning in Cyprus......................................................... 39 5.1.10 Management planning in Austria (Burgenland)................................... 40 5.1.11 Analysis of survey results ............................................................... 41 5.2 Guidelines ............................................................................................. 54 5.2.1 Planning phase ................................................................................ 54 5.2.2 Budget ........................................................................................... 57 5.2.3 Data collection and basic evaluation.................................................... 59 5.2.4 Stakeholder involvement................................................................... 64 5.2.5 Strategic plan and management objectives .......................................... 67 5.2.6 Management measures ..................................................................... 69 5.2.7 Socio – economic benefits ................................................................. 71 5.2.8 Implementation of the plan................................................................ 74 5.2.9 Monitoring....................................................................................... 74 5.2.10 Management effectiveness.............................................................. 77 6 Conclusion ....................................................................................... 81 6.1 Overall conclusion .................................................................................. 81 6.2 In depth discussion of the impact of results................................................ 84 6.3 Limitation of the study ............................................................................ 85 PAGE 4 MGR . JÁN Č ERNECKÝ 7 References....................................................................................... 87 7.1 Literature.............................................................................................. 87 7.2 Internet Resources ................................................................................. 89 List of Figures ....................................................................................... 91 List of Tables......................................................................................... 92 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................... 93 Appendix ............................................................................................... 94 PAGE 5 MGR . JÁN Č ERNECKÝ 1 SUMMARY Management planning in NATURA 2000 sites is a very complex issue. It is especially relevant at this point in time because the process of designation in most of the Member States is finishing and proper management of the sites needs to be established. This thesis aims to assess the actual situation in management planning for NATURA 2000 sites and propose the best practice guidelines through the execution of: 1. An analysis of the actual situation in NATURA 2000 and management planning in Europe – theoretical overview based on literature overview, online sources and expert opinion 2. A more in-depth analysis of the situation with regards to management planning for NATURA 2000 sites in selected Member States (MS) – practical results and an overview at the national level, based especially on an online survey completed by the national experts for NATURA 2000 issues in selected Member States. The analysis is based on the responses of 10 Member States, namely the Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Cyprus, Hungary, Slovakia, Poland, Austria, Romania and UK. 3. A proposal of guidelines for management planning in NATURA 2000 sites, based on best-practice observed from the analysis of the online survey responses, interviews with national NATURA 2000 experts, the literature
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changes in Family Policies and Outcomes: Is There Convergence?
    OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 157 Changes in Family Policies Willem Adema, and Outcomes: Is there Nabil Ali, Convergence? Olivier Thévenon https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz13wllxgzt-en For Official Use DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2014)3 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE For Official Use Official For DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2014)3 OECD SOCIAL, EMPLOYMENT AND MIGRATION WORKING PAPERS No. 157 Changes in family policies and outcomes: is there convergence? Willem Adema, Nabil Ali and Olivier Thévenon JEL Classification: D1 (Household Behavior and Family Economics), J12 (Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure), J13 (Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth), J18 (Demographic economics – public policy) Key words: Family and Child outcomes, Female Employment, Taxes and Benefits, Child Care and Parental Leave. Authorised for publication by Stefano Scarpetta, Director, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. All Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers are now available through the OECD website at www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers English Complete document available on OLIS in its original format - This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of Or. English international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2014)3 DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS www.oecd.org/els OECD SOCIAL, EMPLOYMENT AND MIGRATION WORKING PAPERS www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads Area (On the Reforestation
    FSC National Risk Assessment For Austria DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-AT V1-0 National approval National decision body: Technical project group for CWRA (hosted by FSC Germany) Date: 08.11.2017 International approval FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date: 03 April 2018 International contact Name: Ulrich Malessa Email address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 03 April 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Germany – Verein für verantwortungsvolle maintenance Waldwirtschaft e.V. FSC-NRA-AT V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR AUSTRIA 2018 – 1 of 112 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Austria ......................................................... 3 Background information .............................................................................................................. 4 What do we mean by FSC Controlled Wood? ..................................................................... 4 Why is the risk assessment necessary?.............................................................................. 4 Proceeding in a participatory process ................................................................................. 5 Timeline for the approval of the Austrian FSC risk assessment .......................................... 5 Structure of the document ................................................................................................... 8 Evaluation and control
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Beyond Parties
    Center for the Study of Democracy (University of California, Irvine) Year Paper - Democracy Beyond Parties Peter Mair Leiden University, The Netherlands This paper is posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/05-06 Copyright c 2005 by the author. Democracy Beyond Parties Abstract This paper is concerned primarily with the way in which the changing char- acter of political parties impacts upon their standing, legitimacy, and effective- ness. We see an emerging notion of democracy that is being steadily stripped of its popular component–a notion of democracy without a demos. As I try to show in this paper, much of this has to do with the failings of political parties. I am not suggesting that there has been a wholesale failure of parties; rather, I am seeking to draw attention to an ongoing process in which there are party failings, and in which democracy itself tends to adapt and change to these fail- ings. This process then provokes its own momentum, in which parties become steadily weaker, and in which democracy becomes even more stripped down. CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu This paper derives from a wider project on the politics of popular democracy, and is concerned primarily with the way in which the changing character of political parties impacts upon their standing, legitimacy, and effectiveness.1 The argument that is developed here owes much to that originally advanced by E.E. Schattschneider in The Semi-Sovereign People (1960) and to his contention that control over political decision-making sometimes lay beyond the reach of the ordinary citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Natura 2000 Co-Financing
    ASSESSMENT OF THE NATURA 2000 CO-FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS OF THE EU FINANCING INSTRUMENT A project for the European Commission Noo070307/2010/567338/ETU/F1 March 2011 FINAL REPORT M. Kettunen, O. Carter, S. Gantioler & D. Baldock (IEEP) P. Torkler, A. Arroyo Schnell, A. Baumueller & E. Gerritsen (WWF) M. Rayment, E. Daly & M. Pieterse (GHK) Citation and disclaimer This report should be quoted as follows: Kettunen, M., Baldock D., Gantioler, S., Carter, O., Torkler, P., Arroyo Schnell, A., Baumueller, A., Gerritsen, E., Rayment, M., Daly, E. & Pieterse, M. 2011. Assessment of the Natura 2000 co-financing arrangements of the EU financing instrument. A project for the European Commission – final report. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, Belgium. 138 pp + Annexes. The contents and views contained in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission. The Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) is an independent institute with its own research programmes. Based in London and Brussels, the Institute’s major focus is the development, implementation and evaluation of EU policies of environmental significance, including agriculture, fisheries, regional development and transport. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Conclusions of the Trends II Analysis
    Towards the European higher education area : survey of main reforms from Bologna to Prague Summary and conclusions Guy HAUG and Christian TAUCH Review of structures and trends in the countries not covered in 1999 in the Trends 1 report Trends 1 was mainly based on a survey of structure and trends in higher education in the EU/EEA countries. Trends 2 surveyed the other signatory countries of the Bologna Declaration. This review: - confirms all the main conclusions reached in the Trends 1 report; - reinforces the observation concerning the move towards a two-tier system, but not necessarily corresponding to the definitions used for the degree structure outlined in the Bologna Declaration (e.g. the notions of "postgraduate" or "binary" system of higher education); - confirms the observation concerning the move towards accreditation; - shows that long study programmes at all levels, and rather inflexible mono- disciplinary curricula still exist in several countries and would need to be adjusted to meet the principles of the Bologna Declaration. The follow-up process to the Bologna Declaration: widespread interest and support - The Bologna Declaration is on all agendas: all countries have established a unit or a forum to explain and discuss its content and implications. It serves as a new source of dialogue between Ministries and higher education institutions, and between sub-sectors of higher education; - It is mostly seen as confirming/reinforcing national priorities: this is the process' biggest strength, i.e. it "crystallises" major trends and reveals that issues and solutions have a European dimension; as a consequence the process is not (or no longer) seen as an intrusion, but as a source of information on the most suitable way forward for Europe; - It has been used to accelerate, facilitate and guide change: the main role of the Declaration has become to serve as a long term agenda for structural change; - A major strength of the process is its complementarity with other developments in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe
    DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY AND INTERVENTION BARNETT PAPERS IN SOCIAL RESEARCH Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe Co-ordinating authors: Stuart Basten (University of Oxford), Tomas Frejka (University of Oxford) Contributing authors: Liga Abolina (University of Latvia), Liili Abuladze (Estonian Interuniversity Population Research Centre), Svitlina Aksyonova (Mykhailo Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Research, Kiev), AnĎelko Akrap (University of Zagreb), Ekaterina Antipova (Belarusian State University), Mirjana Bobic (University of Belgrade), Ivan Čipin (University of Zagreb), Liudmila Fakeyeva (Belarusian State University), Ionut Foldes (Babes-Bolyai University), Aiva Jasilioniene (MPIDR), Dora Kostova (MPIDR), Irena Kotowska (Warsaw School of Economics), Boris Krimer (Mykhailo Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Research, Kiev), Elena von der Lippe (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin), Iryna Kurylo (Mykhailo Ptukha Institute of Demography and Social Research, Kiev), Ausra Maslauskaite (Demographic Research Centre of Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas), Julia Mikolai (University of Liverpool), Cornelia Muresan (Babes-Bolyai University), Vasic Petar (University of Belgrade), Michaela Potančoková (Vienna Institute of Demography), Tatyana Pronko (UNFPA in Belarus), Allan Puur (Estonian Interuniversity Population Research Centre), Mirjana Rasevic (Institute of Social Sciences), Anna Rybińska (Warsaw School of Economics), Luule Sakkeus (Estonian Interuniversity Population Research Centre), Jože Sambt (University
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Marin, Dalia Working Paper The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Munich Discussion Paper, No. 2010-14 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Munich, Department of Economics Suggested Citation: Marin, Dalia (2010) : The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany, Munich Discussion Paper, No. 2010-14, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, München, http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.11435 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/104307 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Dalia Marin: The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Munich Discussion Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Fertility in Europe
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND mono- graphs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. BACK PAGE COPY TO BE SUPPLIED Low fertility in Europe The aftermath of the economic crisis of 2008 has undone much of the progress on improving employment and growth in Europe over the last 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria, Finland and Sweden in the European Union
    SMALL COUNTRIES IN THE INTERNAL MARKET Fritz Breuss Austria, Finland and Sweden in the European Union Economic Effects EU integration has made rapid progress over the past decade. After establishing the Internal Market in 1993, the EU achieved the highest possible level of economic integration in 1999 by completing the eco- nomic and monetary union (EMU) with the introduction of the euro as the common currency. Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the EU in 1995, but Sweden is not yet participating in EMU. Against this back- ground, the present article analyses economic developments in these three member states and, using an integration model, sets out to estimate the respective macro-economic effects of EU membership. The re- sults suggest that Finland has benefited most from accession to the EU, ahead of Austria and Sweden. Fritz Breuss is an economist at WIFO and Jean Monnet professor at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (Research Institute for European Affairs). The author is grateful to Wolfgang Pollan and Michael Wüger for useful and constructive comments. The data were processed and analysed with the assistance of Christine Kaufmann • E-Mail-addresses: [email protected], [email protected] In the fourth round of enlargement, Finland, Austria and Sweden joined the Euro- pean Union on 1 January, 1995, bringing the number of member states to 15. The new members were all "rich" countries, whereas in the two preceding rounds with Greece (1981) and Portugal and Spain (1986) "poor" countries had acceded to the EU. The accession process of the most recent round lasted between three and over five years, counting from the submission of the request for EU membership (Austria 17 July 1989, Finland 18 March 1992, Sweden 1 July 1991; Norway 25 November 1992, Switzerland 20 May 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany
    Marin, Dalia: The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20-Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Munich Discussion Paper No. 2010-14 Department of Economics University of Munich Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Online at https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.11435 The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20 - Jobs, Skills, and ‘Reverse Maquiladoras’ in Austria and Germany Dalia Marin University of Munich and Bruegel September 2009 2 Abstract Many people in the European Union fear that Eastern Enlargement leads to major job losses. More recently, these fears about job losses have extended to high skill labor and IT jobs. The paper examines with unique firm level data whether these fears are justified for the two neighboring countries of Eastern Enlargement Austria and Germany. We find that Eastern Enlargement leads to surprising small job losses of less than 0.5 percent of total employment in Germany and of 1.5 percent in Austria, because jobs in Eastern Europe do not compete with jobs in Austria and Germany. Low cost jobs of affiliates in Eastern Europe help Austrian and German firms to stay competitive in an increasingly competitive environment. However, we also find that multinational firms in Austria and Germany are outsourcing skill intensive activities to Eastern Europe taking advantage of cheap abundant skilled labor there. We find that the firms’ outsourcing activities to Eastern Europe are a response to a human capital scar- city in Austria and Germany which has become particularly severe in the 1990s. We indeed find a reverse pattern of ‘Maquiladoras’ emerging with Eastern Enlargement in Austria and Germany compared to what economists have found for the North American Free Trade Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: the Case of the Anti-Temelín Campaign*
    ONDŘEJ CÍSAŘ Masaryk University, Brno Internationalization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: The Case of the Anti-Temelín Campaign* Abstract: The article analyzes different types of coalition formations that were established and hoped to be established during the transnationally coordinated campaign against the second Czech nuclear power plant in Temelín. The case study concentrates on the role the EU played in the campaign. Due to the ongoing accession process, the opponents of the power plant viewed this process as a unique opportunity for halting the plant’s construction. They actively lobbied the European Commission to make the Czech Republic’s accession to the EU conditional on discontinuing the construction. The perceived significance of the EU explains the political strategies the opponents developed at the end of the 1990s, in order to persuade the European Commission to become involved in the campaign. Keywords: transnational contention, social movements, international institutions, European Union, coali- tion, conflict, nuclear energy, Temelín. Introduction Transnational social movement organizations have recently become a major research problem in the study of social movements. The process of trans-nationalization, es- pecially in the framework of the so-called political process model, has been subject to special scholarly attention (see Tarrow 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; Imig and Tarrow 2001; Imig 2004; della Porta and Tarrow 2005; Tarrow 2005). The authors working within the tradition of the political process model have developed a sophisticated set of the- oretical concepts that has made it possible to explain the timing of the mobilization and the demobilization of social movements, the strategies movements employ and, to a certain extent, the political influence movements are capable of exerting (Kriesi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Payment Systems in the Euro Area
    Payment systems in the euro area Euro area Table of contents List of abbreviations............................................................................................................................... 73 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 75 1. Institutional aspects ..................................................................................................................... 76 1.1 The general institutional background ................................................................................ 76 The Settlement Finality Directive (SFD)............................................................................ 77 The Cross-Border Credit Transfers Directive.................................................................... 77 The E-money Directive...................................................................................................... 78 The Investment Services Directive.................................................................................... 78 The Regulation on cross-border payments in euros ......................................................... 78 1.2 The role of the Eurosystem ............................................................................................... 79 1.2.1 Payment systems oversight.................................................................................... 79 1.2.2 Activities in the area of securities clearing and settlement systems......................
    [Show full text]