DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Resources NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT . CHAPTER 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES PURPOSE UPDATE CHRONOLOGY The purpose of this chapter is to provide a NOVEMBER 30, 2005—VERSION 1 comprehensive summary of biological resources in Napa County and a mapped inventory of these features. The data assembled will provide a scientific basis for future regional and site-specific assessments of project impacts and for the evaluation of mitigation measures, conservation proposals, and enhancement opportunities for biological resources. It will also serve as a basis to evaluate current and future policies at the local and Countywide level as they relate to biological resource protection and enhancement. CALIFORNIA NEWT NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Western Mountains Evaluation Area.....................................................................................4-55 TABLE OF CONTENTS Eastern Mountains Evaluation Area......................................................................................4-56 Angwin Evaluation Area ........................................................................................................4-58 Livermore Ranch Evaluation Area.........................................................................................4-58 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................4-1 Southern Interior Valleys Evaluation Area.............................................................................4-59 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................4-1 Central Interior Valleys Evaluation Area................................................................................4-60 Specialized Terms Used.........................................................................................................4-1 Pope Valley Evaluation Area.................................................................................................4-60 Berryessa Evaluation Area....................................................................................................4-61 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................................................4-3 Knoxville Evaluation Area......................................................................................................4-62 Federal Policies ......................................................................................................................4-3 State Policies..........................................................................................................................4-5 FISHERIES RESOURCES..................................................................................................................4-64 Local Policies..........................................................................................................................4-6 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................4-64 Methodology..........................................................................................................................4-64 METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................................4-8 Watershed Characterization..................................................................................................4-64 Evaluation Areas.....................................................................................................................4-8 Characterization of Steelhead Utilization in Napa County.....................................................4-72 Maps/Database Development.................................................................................................4-9 Sensitive Biotic Community Identification .............................................................................4-11 NEW BIOLOGICAL DATABASE.........................................................................................................4-76 Land Cover Conversion Calculations....................................................................................4-12 Identification of Wildlife Movement Areas.............................................................................4-12 CONCLUSIONS AND REPORT UPDATE RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................4-76 Evaluation Areas...................................................................................................................4-14 Conclusions and Report Update Recommendations from Fisheries Resources...................4-77 CONTEXT ......................................................................................................................................4-14 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................4-78 Regional/Statewide Biological Context .................................................................................4-14 Biological Database Expansion.............................................................................................4-78 Countywide Biological Context .............................................................................................4-14 Biological Database Maintenance.........................................................................................4-78 BIOTIC COMMUNITIES ....................................................................................................................4-15 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................4-79 Community Descriptions.......................................................................................................4-15 References Cited ..................................................................................................................4-79 Sensitive Biotic Communities................................................................................................4-41 Other Documents Used.........................................................................................................4-86 SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ............................................................................................................4-43 Definition of Special-Status Species.....................................................................................4-43 APPENDIX A ........................................................................................................................... BIO-A-1 Special-Status Plants............................................................................................................4-44 Special-Status Wildlife..........................................................................................................4-45 APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................... BIO-B-1 WILDLIFE MOVEMENT AREAS.........................................................................................................4-46 APPENDIX C ........................................................................................................................... BIO-C-1 Importance of Wildlife Movement Areas ...............................................................................4-46 Types of Movement Areas....................................................................................................4-47 APPENDIX D ........................................................................................................................... BIO-D-1 Reasons for Movement.........................................................................................................4-47 PPENDIX Movement Requirements......................................................................................................4-48 A E.............................................................................................................................BIO-E-1 Potential Wildlife Movement Areas .......................................................................................4-48 EVALUATION AREA RESOURCES....................................................................................................4-51 Napa River Marshes Evaluation Area...................................................................................4-51 Jamieson and American Canyons Evaluation Area..............................................................4-52 Carneros Evaluation Area.....................................................................................................4-53 Napa Valley Floor Evaluation Area.......................................................................................4-54 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—VERSION 1, NOVEMBER 2005 -4-i- NAPA COUNTY BASELINE DATA REPORT FIGURES MAPS Follows page Follows page 4-1 Use of the Napa County Biological Database .......................................................................4-88 4-1 Evaluation Areas...................................................................................................................4-88 4-2 Napa County Conservation Areas.........................................................................................4-88 4-2 Wildlife Movement—CalWild Linkages..................................................................................4-88
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species Account CALLIPPE SILVERSPOT BUTTERFLY Speyeria Callippe Callippe
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office Species Account CALLIPPE SILVERSPOT BUTTERFLY Speyeria callippe callippe CLASSIFICATION: Endangered Federal Register 62:64306 ; December 5, 1997 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr3183.pdf CRITICAL HABITAT : None designated RECOVERY PLAN: Draft Recovery Plan For The Callippe Silverspot Butterfly (Under development) FIVE-YEAR REVIEW October 20, 2009. We recommended no change in status. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2518.pdf (Latest info on this species.) DESCRIPTION The callippe (ca-LIP-ee) silverspot is a medium-sized butterfly in the brush foot family (Nymphalidae). It has a wingspan of about 5.5 centimeters (2.2 inches). The upper wings are brown with extensive black spots and lines, and the basal areas are extremely dark. The undersides are brown, orange-brown and tan with black lines and distinctive black and bright silver spots. The basal areas of the wings and body are densely hairy. The caterpillars are dark- colored with many branching sharp spines on their backs. Identification of the subspecies is challenging in some parts of its range because it can hybridize with Lilian’s and Comstock’s silverspot butterflies, producing offspring that are intermediate in appearance. Life History and Ecology The callippe silverspot butterfly has one flight of adults per year. It undergoes complete metamorphosis (a structural transformation during the development of an organism) from egg to larval, pupal and adult stages. Egg Stage During the early summer flight season, females lay their eggs on the dry remains of the larval food plant, Johnny jump-up ( Viola pedunculata ), or on the surrounding debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Lingual-Luring by an Aquatic Snake
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 34 No. 1 pp 67-74, 2000 Copyright 2000 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Evidence of Lingual-luring by an Aquatic Snake HARTWELL H. WELSH, JR. AND AMY J. LIND Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1700 Bayview Dr., Arcata, California 95521, USA. E-mail: hwelsh/[email protected] ABSTRACT.-We describe and quantify the components of an unusual snake behavior used to attract fish prey: lingual-luring. Our earlier research on the foraging behavior of the Pacific Coast aquatic garter snake (Thamnophis atratus) indicated that adults are active foragers, feeding primarily on aquatic Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in streambed substrates. Juvenile snakes, however, use primarily ambush tactics to capture larval anurans and juvenile salmonids along stream margins, behaviors that include the lingual-luring described here. We found that lingual-luring differed from typical chemosensory tongue-flicking by the position of the snake, contact of the tongue with the water surface, and the length of time the tongue was extended. Luring snakes are in ambush position and extend and hold their tongues out rigid, with the tongue-tips quivering on the water surface, apparently mimicking insects in order to draw young fish within striking range. This behavior is a novel adaptation of the tongue-vomeronasal system by a visually-oriented predator. The luring of prey by snakes has been asso- luring function (Mushinsky, 1987; Ford and ciated primarily with the use of the tail, a be- Burghardt, 1993). However, Lillywhite and Hen- havior termed caudal luring (e.g., Neill, 1960; derson (1993) noted the occurrence of a pro- Greene and Campbell, 1972; Heatwole and Dav- longed extension of the tongue observed in vine ison, 1976; Jackson and Martin, 1980; Schuett et snakes (e.g., Kennedy, 1965; Henderson and al., 1984; Chizar et al., 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Letter for PG&E Midterm Pruning Report
    Effect of different grazing regimes on Viola pedunculata populations at King Ranch - 2010 December 16, 2010 Prepared by: Elizabeth Bernhardt Tedmund Swiecki Prepared for: Sue Wickham Solano Land Trust 1001 Texas Street, Ste C Fairfield, CA 94533 P HYTOSPHERE R ESEARCH 1027 Davis Street, Vacaville, CA 95687-5495 707-452-8735 email: [email protected] URL: http://phytosphere.com 2010 - King Ranch V. pedunculata grazing study Page 2 of 16 SUMMARY This report discusses second year results of a study that investigates how specific changes to the grazing regime at King Ranch affects cover of Viola pedunculata, the larval food plant of the Callippe silverspot butterfly. In 2007, we established plots in six clusters of three plots each at widely spaced locations on the ranch, with three clusters on each of two common soil types. Cover in these plots was read in spring 2007 and 2008 to serve as a baseline. One plot in each cluster was excluded from grazing early in the grazing season in 2009 and 2010. A second plot in each cluster was excluded from grazing late in the season in 2009 and 2010. The plots excluded from grazing did not differ in V. pedunculata cover or grass cover compared to plots which had not been excluded from grazing. Although grass cover and vegetation height were negatively correlated with V. pedunculata cover, excluding plots from grazing for short periods did not result in V. pedunculata cover differences. Vegetation height and cover were correlated with precipitation during the growing season. Due to the interactions that exist between grazing impacts and weather, we recommend that the study be continued for at least two to three more years, so that treatment effects can be assessed over a wider range of weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In
    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
    [Show full text]
  • MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS the VERANDA at INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1
    MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS THE VERANDA AT INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 LINCOLN AVE CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA July 16, 2020 Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Group 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B Napa, California 94559 Attention: Ms. Olivia Ervin Prepared by Monk & Associates, Inc. 1136 Saranap Avenue, Suite Q Walnut Creek, California 94595 Contact: Ms. Sarah Lynch 1136 Saranap Ave., Suite Q Walnut Creek California 94595 (925) 947-4867 FAX (925) 947-1165 Biological Resources Constraints Analysis MONK & ASSOCIATES The Veranda at Indian Springs 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 Lincoln Ave Calistoga, California APNs 011‐034‐003; ‐004; -005; ‐006; ‐021; ‐022; 028; ‐029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................................... 1 3. STUDY METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 1 4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES .................................... 2 4.1 Evaluation for Waters of the U.S. and Waters of the State .................................................... 3 4.1.1 APPLICABILITY TO THE PROJECT SITE..................................................................................... 3 5. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ISSUES .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    GENERAL INDEX A.GILIM, and n. Aesopic tradition, , and abstractions, n. nn. –, Acarnania, Aetna, , Acastus, Aetna, n. Accius, and n. Agamemnon, n. , , , accusative, , n. , –, , –, , – Agdistis, Achelous, Agenor, Achilles, , , , , , , , ages, myth of, see races, myth of –, , , , , Agias of Troezen, , Acontius, , n. , , agriculture, , , , , , – and n. , , , , , –, Actaeon, n. , , , , n. , –, ; Actor, agriculture section in Works and Acusilaus of Argos, and n. , Days, , , –, and n. Agrius, Adad, aidos, n. , ; personified, , adamant, adjective(s), , , Aietes, Admonitions of Ipuwar,andn. Aigipan, Adodos, ainos, , –, Adrasteia, Aither, and n. Adriatic (sea), Aithon, , n. Aegean (sea), , , aitiology, , , nn. –, Aegimius, – and n. , , , and Aegle, , n. , , , , Aelian Ajax son of Oileus, Historical miscellany, , Ajax son of Telamon, , , – and n. Aeolic dialect, , –, , Akkadian, n. , n. , , , , –; East Al Mina, , or Asiatic Aeolic, –, Alalu, , n. , , Alcaeus, , , n. Aeolids, , , Alcidamas, , , , , , Aeolis, Eastern, , , –, , n. Aeolism, , , , Alcinous, , n. , n. , Aeolus, –, , , , Aeschines, Alcmaeonidae, Aeschylus, , , , and Alcmaeonis, n. , Alcman, n. , and n. , Prometheus Bound, n. , and n. n. Alcmaon, – general index Alcmene, –, –, Antoninus Liberalis, , , n. , , , Anu, –, , –, –, aoidos see singer Alcyone, , , , aorist, , –, Alexander Aetolus, , n. apate, ; personified, Alexander the Great, n. , Aphrodite, , , n. , and n. , n. , and n. ,
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology
    The Ruins of Paradise: Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology by Matthew M. Newman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard Janko, Chair Professor Sara L. Ahbel-Rappe Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Benjamin W. Fortson Professor Ruth S. Scodel Bind us in time, O Seasons clear, and awe. O minstrel galleons of Carib fire, Bequeath us to no earthly shore until Is answered in the vortex of our grave The seal’s wide spindrift gaze toward paradise. (from Hart Crane’s Voyages, II) For Mom and Dad ii Acknowledgments I fear that what follows this preface will appear quite like one of the disorderly monsters it investigates. But should you find anything in this work compelling on account of its being lucid, know that I am not responsible. Not long ago, you see, I was brought up on charges of obscurantisme, although the only “terroristic” aspects of it were self- directed—“Vous avez mal compris; vous êtes idiot.”1 But I’ve been rehabilitated, or perhaps, like Aphrodite in Iliad 5 (if you buy my reading), habilitated for the first time, to the joys of clearer prose. My committee is responsible for this, especially my chair Richard Janko and he who first intervened, Benjamin Fortson. I thank them. If something in here should appear refined, again this is likely owing to the good taste of my committee. And if something should appear peculiarly sensitive, empathic even, then it was the humanity of my committee that enabled, or at least amplified, this, too.
    [Show full text]
  • 0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx
    Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Initial Study / Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration August 12, 2020 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Prepared for: Napa Valley Community College District 2277 Napa-Vallejo Highway Napa, CA 94558 Prepared by: GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150 Santa Rosa, California 95407 August 12, 2020 Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND Table of Contents Project Information ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction and CEQA Requirements ........................................................................... 1-1 CEQA Lead Agency Contact Information ....................................................................... 1-1 Project Background and Objectives ............................................................................... 1-1 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-2 Environmental Protection Actions Incorporated Into the Proposed Project ................... 1-9 Required Agency Approvals ......................................................................................... 1-12 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 1-12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Conservation League Walk Into
    This park receives supportMarin in part Conservation from a nonprofit League organization. For further information, contact: Marin State Park Association WalkP.O. Box 223, Into Inverness, (Conservation) CA 94937 History #11 China Camp State Park Saturday, May 5, 2012 Marin Conservation League 1623–A Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, CA 94901 415.485.6257 marinconservationleague.org Marin Conservation League was founded in 1934 to preserve, protect and enhance the natural assets of Marin County. Marin Conservation League Walk Into (Conservation) History # 11 CHINA CAMP STATE PARK MAY 5, 2012 – 9:30 to 1:00 Today’s Walk As early as 1957, a state report Walk Leaders: had recognized that “this area Our walk begins at the north kiosk Yvonne Brown, Friends of China Camp (should) be included in the State entrance to the Park and parking Park System to meet existing and lot for Back Ranch Meadows Louise Kanter Lipsey, Community Activist future pubic needs.” That report camping area. We will follow the Kathy Cuneo, Ph. D., Botanist suggested a park of 2,700 acres, Shoreline Trail that ascends slightly Nona Dennis, Marin Conservation League with 6 miles of shoreline on San and then follows the contour in Rafael and San Pablo Bays. In and out of the wooded canyons of 1970, the Association of Bay Area San Pedro Ridge, crosses the Back how to help the Friends of China into public ownership only with a governments (ABAG) proposed Ranch Fire Road, and loops back Camp keep the Park open against huge collaborative citizen effort a greenbelt plan that called for to the south side of parking area.
    [Show full text]