0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Initial Study / Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration August 12, 2020 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Prepared for: Napa Valley Community College District 2277 Napa-Vallejo Highway Napa, CA 94558 Prepared by: GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150 Santa Rosa, California 95407 August 12, 2020 Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND Table of Contents Project Information ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction and CEQA Requirements ........................................................................... 1-1 CEQA Lead Agency Contact Information ....................................................................... 1-1 Project Background and Objectives ............................................................................... 1-1 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-2 Environmental Protection Actions Incorporated Into the Proposed Project ................... 1-9 Required Agency Approvals ......................................................................................... 1-12 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 1-12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................................... 2-1 Environmental Analysis .............................................................................................................. 3-1 Aesthetics ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 Agriculture and Forest Resources .................................................................................. 3-4 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 3-5 Biological Resources .................................................................................................... 3-10 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................... 3-18 Energy .......................................................................................................................... 3-22 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................ 3-24 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................... 3-28 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................... 3-30 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................................ 3-37 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................ 3-41 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................ 3-43 Noise ............................................................................................................................. 3-44 Population and Housing ............................................................................................... 3-48 Public Services ............................................................................................................. 3-49 Recreation .................................................................................................................... 3-51 Transportation............................................................................................................... 3-52 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 3-59 Utilities and Service Systems ....................................................................................... 3-61 Wildfire .......................................................................................................................... 3-65 Mandatory Findings of Significance ............................................................................. 3-66 References ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 Report Preparers ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 Napa Valley Community College District ........................................................................ 5-1 GHD ................................................................................................................................ 5-1 Sub-consultants .............................................................................................................. 5-1 Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND | Page i Table index Table 1-1 Proposed Student Housing Unit Types ............................................................................... 1-4 Table 3.3-1 Construction Air Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day) ................................................... 3-6 Table 3.3-2 Operational Period Emissions .......................................................................................... 3-7 Table 3.3-3 Community Risk Impacts at Off-site MEI .......................................................................... 3-8 Table 3.3-4 Community Risk Impacts from Combined Sources on Project Site Receptors ................ 3-9 Table 3.8-1 Annual Project GHG Emissions (CO2e) in Metric Tons and Per Capita .......................... 3-29 Table 3.13-1 Typical Ranges of Construction Noise Levels at 50 feet, Leq (dBA) .............................. 3-45 Table 3.13-2 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ..................................................... 3-47 Table 3-17-1 Bicycle Facility Summary ................................................................................................ 3-53 Table 3-17-2 Student Survey Respondent Residences by Zip Code .................................................. 3-55 Figure index Figure 1 Regional Location Map .......................................................................................................... 1-13 Figure 2 Project Area ........................................................................................................................... 1-14 Figure 3 Preliminary Grading Plan ....................................................................................................... 1-15 Figure 4 Annotated Site Plan ............................................................................................................... 1-16 Figure 5 Building Schematics .............................................................................................................. 1-17 Appendix Index Appendix A - Biological Resources Evaluation Appendix B - Noise Assessment Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND | Page ii Project Information Introduction and CEQA Requirements The Napa Valley Community College District (College), serving as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency, has prepared this Initial Study to provide the public, responsible agencies, and trustee agencies with information about the potential environmental effects of the Napa Valley College Student Housing Project (hereafter referred to as the “project”). The College is considering a student housing initiative aimed at providing a valuable housing resource to its community of students. The project is currently programmed for CEQA adoption in Fall 2020, and Division of the State Architect (DSA) approval in Summer 2021. The purpose of this Initial Study is to provide a basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report, a Mitigated Negative Declaration or a Negative Declaration. This Initial Study has been prepared to satisfy the requirements of CEQA (Public Resources Code, Div 13, Sec 21000-21177) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sec 15000- 15387). Section 15063(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines states the content requirements of an Initial Study as follows: 1. A description of the project including the location of the project; 2. An identification of the environmental setting; 3. An identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries; 4. A discussion of the ways to mitigate the significant effects identified, if any; 5. An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; 6. The name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the Initial Study. CEQA Lead Agency Contact Information The CEQA lead agency for the project is the Napa Valley Community College District. The contact person for the College is: Matt Christensen, Senior Director, Facilities Services Napa Valley Community College District 2277 Napa-Vallejo Highway Napa, CA 94558 Email: [email protected] Phone: 707-256-7580 Project Background and Objectives In 2017, the College submitted a Request for Qualifications
Recommended publications
  • Natural Environment Study Addendum
    Natural Environment Study Addendum State Route 1 HOV Lanes Tier I Corridor Analysis of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternatives (05 SCR-1-PM 7.24-16.13) and Tier II Build Project Analysis 41st Avenue to Soquel Avenue/Drive Auxiliary Lanes and Chanticleer Avenue Pedestrian-Bicycle Overcrossing (05 SCR-1-PM 13.5-14.9) EA 0C7300 April 2018 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to Caltrans, Attn: Matt Fowler, California Department of Transportation – District 5, 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401; 805-542-4603 Voice, or use the California Relay Service 1 (800) 735-2929 (TTY), 1 (800) 735-2929 (Voice), or 711. This page intentionally left blank. State Route 1 HOV Lanes Project Natural Environmental Study Addendum CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT STUDY ADDENDUM METHODS .......................................... 1 2 RESOURCES AND IMPACTS EVALUATION............................................................................... 1 2.1 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT SPECIES ....................................................................................... 1 2.2 SPECIAL STATUS ANIMAL SPECIES .................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 California
    [Show full text]
  • Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District and Associated CEQA Findings
    1030 Seminary Street, Suite B Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Napa, California 94559 Subdivision of the State of California Phone: (707) 259-8645 www.napa.lafco.ca.gov We Manage Local Government Boundaries, Evaluate Municipal Services, and Protect Agriculture Agenda Item 9a (Action) TO: Local Agency Formation Commission PREPARED BY: Brendon Freeman, Executive Officer Dawn Mittleman Longoria, Analyst II MEETING DATE: February 1, 2021 SUBJECT: Proposed Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District and Associated CEQA Findings RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Making Determinations – Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District (NSD) approving the proposed annexation with standard conditions and making California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings (Attachment One). BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Applicant: Napa Valley College Tax Sharing Agreement: Yes – master (landowner petition) tax exchange agreement Proposed Action: Annexation to NSD Landowner Consent: 100% APN: 046-450-054 Protest Proceedings: Waived Area Size: 23.1 acres CEQA: Napa Valley College Student Address: 100 Magnolia Drive Housing Project Initial Study, Mitigated Jurisdiction: City of Napa Negative Declaration, & Mitigation Sphere of Influence Consistency: Yes Monitoring & Reporting Program Policy Consistency: Yes Current Land Uses: Undeveloped The purpose of the proposal is to facilitate the planned development of the affected territory consistent with the Napa Valley College Student Housing Project. The project will be located to the north of the Napa Valley College’s existing Performing Arts Center. The project involves a mix of apartments and traditional dorm-style units, study rooms and social gathering spaces, a new vehicle connection and parking lot, new pedestrian connections, and new wastewater and storm water infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development
    Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development Agreement Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachments April 16, 2021 ATTACHMENT A Existing Site Photographs Existing access road Existing water tank site Existing "house site" on one of the proposed Development Parcels ATTACHMENT B Prepared For: Michelle Irace, Planning Manager Department of Community Development 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482 APNs: 001-040-83, 157- 070-01, 157-070-02, and 003-190-01 Prepared by Jacobszoon & Associates, Inc. Alicia Ives Ringstad Senior Wildlife Biologist [email protected] Date: March 11, 2021 Updated: April 8, 2021 Biological Assessment Report Table of Contents Section 1.0: Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 2.0: Regulations and Descriptions ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Natural Communities and Sensitive Natural Communities .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Special-Status Species...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Some Important Ornamental Flowering Plants of Solan, Hima- Chal Pradesh with Enumeration
    Asian J. Adv. Basic Sci.: 2015, 3(2), 84-90 ISSN (Print): 2454 – 7492 ISSN (Online): 2347 – 4114 www.ajabs.org Survey of Some Important Ornamental Flowering Plants of Solan, Hima- chal Pradesh with Enumeration Aditya Kumar1*, Sayeeda Kousar Bhatti 2, Chhavi Mangla 3 and Ashok Aggarwal 4 1Department of Botany, Dayanand Post Graduate College, Hisar, Haryana, INDIA 2School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, INDIA 3Department of Botany, DAV College (Lahore), Ambala City, Haryana, INDIA 4Department of Botany, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, INDIA * Correspondance: E-mail: [email protected] (Received 01 June, 2015; Accepted 06 June, 2015; Published 09 June, 2015) ABSTRACT: The paper documents the knowledge of some important ornamental flowering plants of Solan, Hima- chal Pradesh. In the present investigation, seasonal trips were made to collect the plants from different sites of dis- trict Solan, Himachal Pradesh. The ornamental flowering plants were observed and some of the plants with medici- nal as well as ornamental importance were selected. Proper field note of each specimen was recorded and their iden- tification was done by giving botanical name, local name, parts used, habitat and general morphology. Fifteen or- namentally important plant species belonging to 15 genera and 11 families were studied. The purpose of study is to explore and document the important plant species as they play a vital role in decorative purposes, perfume indus- tries and as well as in the field of medicines. Keywords: Ornamental flowering plants; Solan, Himachal Pradesh; Economic and Medicinal Importance.. INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of life, ornamental plants also plays an equally important part plants have served humankind as source of fuel, food, in cleansing urban air, cooling the atmosphere around clothing, shelter and medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • California Geophytesgeophytes
    $12.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 44, NO.3 • DECEMBER 2016 FREMONTIAFREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY SPECIAL ISSUE: VOL. 44, NO. 3, DECEMBER 2016 FREMONTIA CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA GEOPHYTESGEOPHYTES V44_3_cover.pmd 1 2/20/17, 5:26 AM CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 FREMONTIA Phone: (916) 447-2677 Fax: (916) 447-2727 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] VOL. 44, NO. 3, DECEMBER 2016 MEMBERSHIP Copyright © 2016 Members receive many benefits, including subscriptions to Fremontia and California Native Plant Society the CNPS Bulletin. Membership form is on inside back cover. Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Benefactor . $600 International or Library . $75 M. Kat Anderson, Guest Editor Patron . $300 Individual . $45 Michael Kauffmann, Editor Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 CORPORATE/ORGANIZATIONAL Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer 10+ Employees . $2,500 4-6 Employees . $500 7-10 Employees . $1,000 1-3 Employees . $150 california Native STAFF & CONTRACTORS Plant Society Dan Gluesenkamp: Executive Director Marin: Charlotte Torgovitsky Chris Brown: Admin Assistant Milo Baker: Leia Giambastiani, Sarah Protecting California’s Native Flora Jennifer Buck-Diaz: Vegetation Ecologist Gordon Since 1965 Catherine Curley: Assistant Botanist Mojave Desert: Timothy Thomas Joslyn Curtis, Assistant Veg. Ecologist Monterey Bay: Christopher Hauser The views expressed by authors do not Julie Evens: Vegetation Program Dir. Mount Lassen: Woody Elliot necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon Mcbride Mcbride Mcbride
    RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT GUIDE FOR TIMBER HARVEST PLANS IN COASTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY RARE AND ENDANGEREDRARE AND PLA ENDANGEREDNT GUIDE FOR PLANT TIMBER GUIDE HARVEST FOR TIMBER PLANS HARVEST IN COASTAL PLANS MENDOCINO IN COASTAL COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT GUIDE FOR TIMBER HARVEST PLANS IN COASTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY Field Guide Rare and Endangered Field GuideField Guide Plant Field Guide RareRare and and Endangered Endangered Plant Plant Field Guide for Timber Harvest Plans FieldField Guide Guide for forTimber Timber Harvest Harvest Plans Plans in inCoastalin Coastal Coastal Mendocino MendocinoMendocino County County County GordonGordonGordon McBride McBride McBride This Guide was published by Mendocino County Resource Conservation District This Guide was published by 410 Jones St., Suite C-3 MendocinoUkiah, CACounty 95482 Resource Conservation District 410 JonesPhone: St., (707) Suite 462 C-3664-3 Ukiah, CA 95482 Phone: (707) 462-3664 This publication can be downloaded for free from Edited by our website: Tamara Camper, Shayne Green, www.mcrcd.org EditedEdited by by This publication can be downloaded for free from Darcie Mahoney & Geri Hulse-Stephens our website: Tamara Camper, Shayne Green, Tamara Camper, Shayne Green, www.mcrcd.org Darcie Mahoney &43 Geri Hulse-Stephens 43 Darcie Mahoney & Geri Hulse-Stephens RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT GUIDE FOR TIMBER HARVEST PLANS IN COASTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY RARE AND ENDANGEREDRARE AND PLA ENDANGEREDNT GUIDE FOR PLANT TIMBER GUIDE HARVEST FOR TIMBER PLANS HARVEST IN COASTAL PLANS
    [Show full text]
  • Line 406 Rare Plant Survey
    E-2: Line 406 Rare Plant Survey April 2009 PG&E Line 4061407 Natural Gas Pipeline Draft EIR TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL Rare Plant Survey, PG&E Line 406 Project in Yolo County, California PREPARED FOR: Marjorie Eisert/ CH2M HILL PREPARED BY: Tim Armstrong/ CH2M HILL Andy Mieske/ Garcia and Associates DATE: June 27, 2007 Introduction This project is one of several new local gas transmission pipeline projects forecasted in PG&E's long-range investment plans for the local gas transmission system. Connection of PG&E's Line 400/401, located at the base of the Capay Hills in Yolo County to Line 172A in the town of Yolo, will increase the capacity of their local gas transmission system (Figure 1 ). PG&E's ten-year investment plan for the local transmission system includes the construction of a new pipeline from Line 172A in the town of Yolo east to Line 123 in Roseville some time after 2010. The proposed project (Line 406) consists of approximately 14 miles of a 30-inch diameter gas transmission pipeline. In addition to the main pipeline, additional support structures for the pipeline will be required. Main line and bridle valves and blow-off stacks will be installed at Line 400/401 and an above ground and fenced pressure limiting and metering station at Line 172A will be constructed. Other pipeline appurtenances include above ground line-markers, electrolysis test stations (ETS), and possibly a mainline valve with an above ground handwheel operator. The proposed in-service date is September 1, 2009 with the start of construction projected to be May 1, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties James P. Smith Jr. Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr., "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Walker Ridge and Bear Valley Area, Lake and Colusa Counties" (2018). Botanical Studies. 76. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/76 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE WALKER RIDGE - BEAR VALLEY AREA (LAKE AND COLUSA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA) Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. & John O. Sawyer, Jr. Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Tenth Edition: 01 July 2018 Chlorogalum pomeridianum var. pomeridianum • soaproot F E R N S Dichelostemma multiflorum • wild-hyacinth Dichelostemma volubile • snake-lily, twining brodiaea Dipterostemon capitatum ssp. capitatum • blue dicks Aspidotis densa • Indian's dream Hastingsia alba • white-flowered schoenolirion Equisetum arvense • field horsetail Triteleia hyacinthina • white brodiaea Equisetum laevigatum • smooth scouring-rush Triteleia laxa • Ithuriel's spear Pellaea andromedifolia var. pubescens • coffee fern Triteleia peduncularis • long-rayed triteleia Pellaea mucronata var.
    [Show full text]
  • Observaciones Sobre La Flora Y Vegetación De Los Alrededores De Tocopilla (22ºs, Chile)
    BoletínE. BARRERA del Museo / Tipos Nacional de musgos de Historia depositados Natural, en Chile,el Museo 56: Nacional27- 52 (2007) de Historia Natural 27 OBSERVACIONES SOBRE LA FLORA Y VEGETACIÓN DE LOS ALREDEDORES DE TOCOPILLA (22ºS, CHILE) FEDERICO LUEBERT 1,2 NICOLÁS GARCÍA 1 NATALIE SCHULZ 3 1 Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 9206, Santiago, Chile. ���������������������������������������������E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Institut für Biologie - Systematische Botanik und Pflanzengeographie, Freie Universität Berlin, Altensteinstraße 6, D-14195 Berlin, Deutschland. E-mail:����������������������������������� [email protected] 3 Institut für Geographie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kochstr. 4/4��������� 91054 Erlangen, Deutschland. E-mail: [email protected] RESUMEN La flora de los alrededores de Tocopilla está compuesta por 146 especies de plantas vasculares. Entre las formas de vida, las terófitas presentan el mayor número de especies en la flora (43%), pero están totalmente ausentes durante los años secos. Dos unidades de vegetación pueden ser identificadas: matorral desértico de Nolana peruviana, en las quebradas y laderas bajo 500 m de altitud, y matorral desértico de Eulychnia iquiquensis y Ephedra breana, en las laderas sobre 500 m. Se discuten algunos aspectos relativos a la flora y la relación entre el clima y la vegetación. Palabras clave: Ambientes áridos, Biogeografía, Clima, Comunidades vegetales, Desierto de Atacama. ABSTRACT Observations on the flora and vegetation of Tocopilla surroundings (22ºS, Chile). The flora of Tocopilla and adjacent zones is composed of 146 vascular plant species. Among the life- forms, the therophytes represent the highest proportion of the flora (43%), but are absent during the dry years.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Biological Resources Reports
    City of Suisun City - Walters Road West Project Draft EIR Appendix C: Biological Resources Reports Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\3004\30040001\DEIR\30040001_Sec11-00_App Dividers.doc REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THE WALTERS ROAD PROPERTY SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: WALMART c/o Robert A. Karn & Associates 707 Beck Avenue Fairfield, California 94533 Prepared by: OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Wetland Regulatory Consultants 1390 Willow Pass Road, Suite 370 Concord, California 94520 Phone: (925) 825-2111 − FAX (925) 825-2112 Contact: Jeff Olberding JULY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 1 4.0 REGULATORY SETTING............................................................................................. 2 4.1 Federal Regulatory Setting ..................................................................................... 2 4.1.1 Plants and Wildlife...................................................................................... 2 4.1.2 Wetlands/Waters......................................................................................... 2 4.1.3 Migratory Bird Treaty Act.........................................................................
    [Show full text]