Common Name Botanical Name Alleghany
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Phytochemical-Constituents, Safety and Efficacy of Commonly Used Medicinal Plants for the Treatment of Malaria in Ethiopia-A Review
Pharmacy & Pharmacology International Journal Review Article Open Access Phytochemical-constituents, safety and efficacy of commonly used medicinal plants for the treatment of malaria in Ethiopia-a review Abstract Volume 7 Issue 6 - 2019 Background: Malaria is among the ten top leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children under-5 years. Due to the rise of drug-resistant parasites and limited therapeutic Tigist Abera, Rekik Ashebir, Hirut Basha, efficacy of the available drugs, there is a need to search novel antimalarial drugs from Eyob Debebe, Abiy Abebe, Asfaw Meresa, medicinal plants commonly utilized as traditional medicines. Traditional medicines Samuel Woldekidan are often more available, affordable, sometimes are perceived as more effective than Traditional and Modern Medicine Research Directorate, conventional antimalarial drugs, cultural acceptable and the relatively lower cost. Hence Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Ethiopia traditional medicine becomes the novel candidate for the search and development of drugs for the prevention and treatment of malaria. Correspondence: Tigist Abera, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Objective: The present study aimed to review phytochemical constitute, safety and efficacy Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, commonly used medicinal plants for malaria treatment in Ethiopia. Email Methods: A web-based literature search was done by using scientific databases including Received: October 07, 2019 | Published: November 26, 2019 Pub Med, Science -
Reconstructing the Basal Angiosperm Phylogeny: Evaluating Information Content of Mitochondrial Genes
55 (4) • November 2006: 837–856 Qiu & al. • Basal angiosperm phylogeny Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes Yin-Long Qiu1, Libo Li, Tory A. Hendry, Ruiqi Li, David W. Taylor, Michael J. Issa, Alexander J. Ronen, Mona L. Vekaria & Adam M. White 1Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, The University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. [email protected] (author for correspondence). Three mitochondrial (atp1, matR, nad5), four chloroplast (atpB, matK, rbcL, rpoC2), and one nuclear (18S) genes from 162 seed plants, representing all major lineages of gymnosperms and angiosperms, were analyzed together in a supermatrix or in various partitions using likelihood and parsimony methods. The results show that Amborella + Nymphaeales together constitute the first diverging lineage of angiosperms, and that the topology of Amborella alone being sister to all other angiosperms likely represents a local long branch attrac- tion artifact. The monophyly of magnoliids, as well as sister relationships between Magnoliales and Laurales, and between Canellales and Piperales, are all strongly supported. The sister relationship to eudicots of Ceratophyllum is not strongly supported by this study; instead a placement of the genus with Chloranthaceae receives moderate support in the mitochondrial gene analyses. Relationships among magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots remain unresolved. Direct comparisons of analytic results from several data partitions with or without RNA editing sites show that in multigene analyses, RNA editing has no effect on well supported rela- tionships, but minor effect on weakly supported ones. Finally, comparisons of results from separate analyses of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes demonstrate that mitochondrial genes, with overall slower rates of sub- stitution than chloroplast genes, are informative phylogenetic markers, and are particularly suitable for resolv- ing deep relationships. -
Honey Bee Suite © Rusty Burlew 2015 Master Plant List by Scientific Name United States
Honey Bee Suite Master Plant List by Scientific Name United States © Rusty Burlew 2015 Scientific name Common Name Type of plant Zone Full Link for more information Abelia grandiflora Glossy abelia Shrub 6-9 http://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/all/abelia-x-grandiflora/ Acacia Acacia Thorntree Tree 3-8 http://www.2020site.org/trees/acacia.html Acer circinatum Vine maple Tree 7-8 http://www.nwplants.com/business/catalog/ace_cir.html Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple Tree 5-9 http://treesandshrubs.about.com/od/commontrees/p/Big-Leaf-Maple-Acer-macrophyllum.htm Acer negundo L. Box elder Tree 2-10 http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?kempercode=a841 Acer rubrum Red maple Tree 3-9 http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?taxonid=275374&isprofile=1&basic=Acer%20rubrum Acer rubrum Swamp maple Tree 3-9 http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?taxonid=275374&isprofile=1&basic=Acer%20rubrum Acer saccharinum Silver maple Tree 3-9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acer_saccharinum Acer spp. Maple Tree 3-8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple Achillea millefolium Yarrow Perennial 3-9 http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?kempercode=b282 Aesclepias tuberosa Butterfly weed Perennial 3-9 http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?kempercode=b490 Aesculus glabra Buckeye Tree 3-7 http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?taxonid=281045&isprofile=1&basic=buckeye -
Medical Ethnobotany of the Albanian Alps in Kosovo
Medical ethnobotany of the Albanian Alps in Kosovo Behxhet Mustafa, University of Prishtina Avni Hajdari, University of Prishtina Feriz Krasniqi, Kosovo Academy of Sciences and Arts Esat Hoxha, University of Prishtina Hatixhe Ademi, University of Prishtina Cassandra Quave, Emory University Andrea Pieroni, Univ Gastron Sci Journal Title: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine Volume: Volume 8 Publisher: BioMed Central | 2012-01-28, Pages 6-6 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-6 Permanent URL: https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/rnh2w Final published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-6 Copyright information: © 2012 Mustafa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Accessed September 26, 2021 3:06 AM EDT Mustafa et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2012, 8:6 http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/8/1/6 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Medical ethnobotany of the Albanian Alps in Kosovo Behxhet Mustafa1, Avni Hajdari1*, Feriz Krasniqi2, Esat Hoxha1, Hatixhe Ademi1, Cassandra L Quave3 and Andrea Pieroni4 Abstract Background: Ethnobotanical studies are crucial in South-Eastern Europe for fostering local development and also for investigating the dynamics of Traditional Environmental Knowledge (TEK) related to plants in one of the most crucial European hotspots for biocultural diversity. The current medico-ethnobotanical survey was conducted in rural alpine communities in Kosovo. The aims of the study were twofold: 1) to document the state of TEK of medicinal plants in these communities; 2) to compare these findings with that of similar field studies previously conducted among local populations inhabiting the Montenegrin and Albanian side of the same Alpine range. -
Field Grown Cut Flowers
Nursery FACTSHEET September 2015 Field Grown Cut Flowers INTRODUCTION The culture of field grown flowers is an area of floriculture that is generating a lot of interest and is enjoying a steady growth rate. It provides a way to enter the floriculture industry without the $100 to $150 per square metre capital costs that are involved in some greenhouse crops. Recently, the largest area of growth has been in the specialty cut flowers as opposed to the more traditional field grown crops like statice, dahlias and gypsophila. As gardening increases in popularity, home consumers are becoming familiar with the many new and different flower species. In turn, consumers are starting to look for and demand these flowers in floral design work. Site Selection Whether you plan to lease or own the land, there are basic, yet important, site considerations (see Table 1). It is easier if you start with a suitable site rather than try to modify it later. Table 1. Considerations when selecting a production site Soil: It should be fertile and well drained. Soil tests are a basic management tool. Even if you are familiar with the soil in the area, it must be tested to determine pH, organic matter and nutrient levels. A pH of 6.0–6.5 is suitable for most cuts. Know the requirements of your crop before you make any major changes. Water: Good quality water must be available in sufficient quantities. Have the water source tested to determine essentials like pH and EC (salinity). Terrain: Flat land is easier to work. Watch out for low lying pockets that might be prone to early and late frosts, or flooding during the wet months. -
Boxwood Blight: a New Ornamental Disease Threat
DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE Agriculture and Natural Resources RESEARCH & EXTENSION University of Arkansas System FSA7577 Boxwood Blight: A New Ornamental Disease Threat Keiddy E. Importance (Figure 2). Although the plant attempts Urrea-Morawicki to regrow, repeated infections and Boxwood blight caused by two defoliation weaken it and can lead to Instructor/Diagnostician - related fungi, Calonectria pseud- Plant Health Clinic plant death. Dark brown to black stem onaviculata, (previously known as streak or cankers are also symptoms of Cylindrocladium pseudonaviculatum infection (Figure 3). These lesions can Sherrie E. Smith or. Cylindrocladium buxicola) and Plant Pathologist/Instructor be found occurring anywhere from the Calonectria henricotiae (previously Plant Health Clinic soil line to the twig tips. Under high known as Cylindrocladium buxicola) humidity conditions, masses of white is an important disease of Boxwood fruiting bodies are produced on the (Boxus). Boxwood blight was first undersurface of infected leaves (Figure described in the United Kingdom in the 4), containing the distinctive spores of mid-1990s and in New Zealand in 2002. the fungi (Figure 5). These white struc- Since these initial reports, the disease tures are readily visible with a hand has become widespread throughout the lens and are useful in distinguishing United Kingdom, New Zealand, Europe boxwood blight from another boxwood and Asia. In the United States, Boxwood disease, Volutella blight. The Volutella blight was reported for the first time blight fungus (Volutella buxi) produces in 2011 in North Carolina and salmon colored fruiting bodies on leaf Connecticut. By 2018, twenty-five states undersurfaces. Symptoms of Volutella had confirmed the disease, and it was blight and Phytophthora root rot are first identified in Arkansas in Pulaski sometimes confused with boxwood county in 2019. -
Fragrant Annuals Fragrant Annuals
TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety JanuaryJanuary // FebruaryFebruary 20112011 New Plants for 2011 Unusual Trees with Garden Potential The AHS’s River Farm: A Center of Horticulture Fragrant Annuals Legacies assume many forms hether making estate plans, considering W year-end giving, honoring a loved one or planting a tree, the legacies of tomorrow are created today. Please remember the American Horticultural Society when making your estate and charitable giving plans. Together we can leave a legacy of a greener, healthier, more beautiful America. For more information on including the AHS in your estate planning and charitable giving, or to make a gift to honor or remember a loved one, please contact Courtney Capstack at (703) 768-5700 ext. 127. Making America a Nation of Gardeners, a Land of Gardens contents Volume 90, Number 1 . January / February 2011 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM THE AHS 2011 Seed Exchange catalog online for AHS members, new AHS Travel Study Program destinations, AHS forms partnership with Northeast garden symposium, registration open for 10th annual America in Bloom Contest, 2011 EPCOT International Flower & Garden Festival, Colonial Williamsburg Garden Symposium, TGOA-MGCA garden photography competition opens. 40 GARDEN SOLUTIONS Plant expert Scott Aker offers a holistic approach to solving common problems. 42 HOMEGROWN HARVEST page 28 Easy-to-grow parsley. 44 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK Enlightened ways to NEW PLANTS FOR 2011 BY JANE BERGER 12 control powdery mildew, Edible, compact, upright, and colorful are the themes of this beating bugs with plant year’s new plant introductions. -
Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa
Systematic Botany (2010), 35(2): pp. 425–441 © Copyright 2010 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa David C. Tank 1,2,3 and Michael J. Donoghue 1 1 Peabody Museum of Natural History & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 U. S. A. 2 Department of Forest Resources & Stillinger Herbarium, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P. O. Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Javier Francisco-Ortega Abstract— Previous attempts to resolve relationships among the primary lineages of Campanulidae (e.g. Apiales, Asterales, Dipsacales) have mostly been unconvincing, and the placement of a number of smaller groups (e.g. Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, Escalloniaceae) remains uncertain. Here we build on a recent analysis of an incomplete data set that was assembled from the literature for a set of 50 campanulid taxa. To this data set we first added newly generated DNA sequence data for the same set of genes and taxa. Second, we sequenced three additional cpDNA coding regions (ca. 8,000 bp) for the same set of 50 campanulid taxa. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive sample of cam- panulid diversity to date, including ca. 17,000 bp of cpDNA for 122 campanulid taxa and five outgroups. Simply filling in missing data in the 50-taxon data set (rendering it 94% complete) resulted in a topology that was similar to earlier studies, but with little additional resolution or confidence. -
Artemisia Arctica Ssp. Arctica
Floricultural Potential for Adaptable, Wind-Tolerant, Flowering Perennial, Artemisia arctica Less. ssp. arctica ‘Boreal Wormwood’ David Koser Master of Professional Studies (MPS) in Horticulture University of Minnesota 5/13/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Artemisia arctica ssp. arctica, commonly known as ‘Boreal Wormwood’, is an herbaceous perennial of the family Asteraceae which grows to a height of approximately 25-40 cm and produces subtle, slightly aromatic, drooping, yellow to slightly red, disk flowers from July to September. It is natively found within inhospitable environments throughout the meadows and mountains of Northwestern North America and Northeast Asia. Consequently, this subspecies is extremely adaptable and resilient, possessing the ability to withstand: highly acid to slightly alkaline soil pH, moderate to dry soil moisture levels, low to moderately-high soil nitrate levels, soil disturbance caused by frequent freeze and thaw events, intense sunlight, high winds, violent storms, moderately-high heat stress and extreme cold. Accordingly, this subspecies has excellent market potential as a hardy, adaptable, low-maintenance, herbaceous, flowering perennial for retail and wholesale nursery markets in northern climates. Specifically, its late bloom-time, as well as its storm, flood and drought tolerance, make it an appealing option for consumers seeking to add mid- to late-summer seasonal interest to their gardens, and improve their landscaping’s resilience to global climate change. Historically, this subspecies was also used by native peoples to treat a large diversity of ailments, ranging from diabetes and cancer to the common cold, and may possess phytotherapeutic benefits that would enable it to be marketed as a value-added, medicinal product. -
Trees, Shrubs, and Perennials That Intrigue Me (Gymnosperms First
Big-picture, evolutionary view of trees and shrubs (and a few of my favorite herbaceous perennials), ver. 2007-11-04 Descriptions of the trees and shrubs taken (stolen!!!) from online sources, from my own observations in and around Greenwood Lake, NY, and from these books: • Dirr’s Hardy Trees and Shrubs, Michael A. Dirr, Timber Press, © 1997 • Trees of North America (Golden field guide), C. Frank Brockman, St. Martin’s Press, © 2001 • Smithsonian Handbooks, Trees, Allen J. Coombes, Dorling Kindersley, © 2002 • Native Trees for North American Landscapes, Guy Sternberg with Jim Wilson, Timber Press, © 2004 • Complete Trees, Shrubs, and Hedges, Jacqueline Hériteau, © 2006 They are generally listed from most ancient to most recently evolved. (I’m not sure if this is true for the rosids and asterids, starting on page 30. I just listed them in the same order as Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II.) This document started out as my personal landscaping plan and morphed into something almost unwieldy and phantasmagorical. Key to symbols and colored text: Checkboxes indicate species and/or cultivars that I want. Checkmarks indicate those that I have (or that one of my neighbors has). Text in blue indicates shrub or hedge. (Unfinished task – there is no text in blue other than this text right here.) Text in red indicates that the species or cultivar is undesirable: • Out of range climatically (either wrong zone, or won’t do well because of differences in moisture or seasons, even though it is in the “right” zone). • Will grow too tall or wide and simply won’t fit well on my property. -
Native Vascular Plants
!Yt q12'5 3. /3<L....:::5_____ ,--- _____ Y)Q.'f MUSEUM BULLETIN NO.4 -------------- Copy I NATIVE VASCULAR PLANTS Endangered, Threatened, Or Otherwise In Jeopardy In South Carolina By Douglas A. Rayner, Chairman And Other Members Of The South Carolina Advisory Committee On Endangered, Threatened And Rare Plants SOUTH CAROLINA MUSEUM COMMISSION S. C. STATE LIR7~'· '?Y rAPR 1 1 1995 STATE DOCU~ 41 ;::,·. l s NATIVE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDANGERED, THREATENED, OR OTHERWISE IN JEOPARDY IN SOUTH CAROLINA by Douglas A. Rayner, Chairman and other members of the South Carolina Advisory Committee on Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants March, 1979 Current membership of the S. C. Committee on Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants Subcommittee on Criteria: Ross C. Clark, Chairman (1977); Erskine College (taxonomy and ecology) Steven M. Jones, Clemson University (forest ecology) Richard D. Porcher, The Citadel (taxonomy) Douglas A. Rayner, S.C. Wildlife Department (taxonomy and ecology) Subcommittee on Listings: C. Leland Rodgers, Chairman (1977 listings); Furman University (taxonomy and ecology) Wade T. Batson, University of South Carolina, Columbia (taxonomy and ecology) Ross C. Clark, Erskine College (taxonomy and ecology) John E. Fairey, III, Clemson University (taxonomy) Joseph N. Pinson, Jr., University of South Carolina, Coastal Carolina College (taxonomy) Robert W. Powell, Jr., Converse College (taxonomy) Douglas A Rayner, Chairman (1979 listings) S. C. Wildlife Department (taxonomy and ecology) INTRODUCTION South Carolina's first list of rare vascular plants was produced as part of the 1976 S.C. En dangered Species Symposium by the S. C. Advisory Committee on Endangered, Threatened and Rare Plants, 1977. The Symposium was a joint effort of The Citadel's Department of Biology and the S. -
Fv{Âçä~|ÄÄ Géãçá{|Ñ CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
fv{âçÄ~|ÄÄ gÉãÇá{|Ñ CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA cxÇÇáçÄätÇ|t fàtàx YÄÉãxÜ `ÉâÇàt|Ç _tâÜxÄ NATIVE PLANT LIST A RESIDENT’S GUIDE 2017 fv{âçÄ~|ÄÄ gÉãÇá{|Ñ CHESTER COUNTY NATIVE PLANT LIST A Resident’s Guide Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 So what exactly is a Native Plant? ................................................................. 1 Go native with these 6 basics: ........................................................................ 2 In Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 NATIVE PLANT LIST OVERVIEW ............................................................................. 5 TREES ................................................................................................................. 6 EVERGREEN ................................................................................................... 6 DECIDUOUS ................................................................................................... 6 FLOWERING ................................................................................................... 7 SHRUBS .............................................................................................................. 8 EVERGREEN ................................................................................................... 8 DECIDUOUS ..................................................................................................