DOCSLIB.ORG

American Museum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Museum AMERICAN MUSEUM Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 U.S.A. NUMBER 2688 OCTOBER 30, 1979 EUGENE S. GAFFNEY AND MALCOLM C. MC KENNA A Late Permian Captorhinid from Rhodesia IITVWW"Wkq..-, if AMERICAN MUSEUM Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 2688, pp. 1-15, figs. 1-6, tables 1, 2 October 30, 1979 A Late Permian Captorhinid from Rhodesia EUGENE S. GAFFNEY' AND MALCOLM C. MC KENNA2 ABSTRACT Two partial skulls from the late Permian torhinidae is a monophyletic group (possibly Madumabisa Mudstone in the Middle Zambezi Basin including turtles) with these derived characters: of Rhodesia belong to the captorhinid genus Pro- downturned premaxilla, ectopterygoid and tabular tocaptorhinus. Heretofore, Protocaptorhinus has absent, medial process of jugal. Protocaptorhinus been known only from the Early Permian of Texas, differs from Romeria in having a shallow median whereas Africa has yielded only one other cap- parietal embayment and differs from remaining cap- torhinid, Moradisaurus, from Niger. The Cap- torhinids in lacking a retroarticular process. INTRODUCTION In May 1976, Mr. Brian Hosking and the in Kuhn (1969), but the papers that are the junior author made a small collection of therap- most pertinent to this study are Clark and Car- sid and captorhinid skulls from a late Permian roll (1973) and Heaton (1979). locality in Rhodesia. The two captorhinid spec- The junior author provided the geologic and imens are of particular interest because they locality information (as well as the specimens), provide the second record of this group from and the senior author is alone responsible for Africa. The captorhinid skulls have been identi- the morphology and discussion sections. fied as Protocaptorhinus, a form previously known only from the Early Permian of North ACKNOWLEDGMENTS America. The Captorhinidae is usually placed We are particularly indebted to Dr. Robert in the Captorhinomorpha, an avowedly para- Carroll, McGill University, Montreal, and Drs. phyletic group that is generally considered to Malcolm Heaton and Robert Reisz, Erindale contain the ancestors of later amniotes. This University, Toronto, for sharing their speci- situation has prompted a phylogenetic study of mens and unpublished data, and for examining the Captorhinidae using shared derived char- our material and providing us with some very acters (see Gaffney, 1979, for a discussion of useful ideas. Dr. Heaton gave us free access to the methodology used here). his thesis on Eocaptorhinus which, at that time, Previous work on captorhinids and cap- was still unpublished. The very difficult prep- torhinomorphs in general has been summarized aration of the specimens was accomplished by 'Associate Curator, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History. 2Frick Curator, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History. Copyright (©) American Museum of Natural History 1979 ISSN 0003-0082 / Price $1.30 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 2688 Mr. Gil Stucker using an air abrasive machine. Rhodesia. Fossils occur in sideritic concretions Mr. Chester Tarka and Ms. Lorraine Meeker forming a lag concentrate. produced the illustrations. HolUZON: Middle Madumabisa Mudstones, We also thank Professor G. Bond and Mr. K5d of Bond (1973); late Permian (Dzhulfian) in Brian Hosking of the Geology Department, age. The captorhinids were found associated University of Rhodesia, for their hospitality and with therapsids, most of which are endothio- logistic support of the junior author, both in donts similar to Emydops (C. B. Cox, personal Salisbury and in the field. Dr. Raath, formerly commun.). Director of Museums and Monuments of Rho- COLLECTORS: Malcolm C. McKenna and desia, now at the Bernard Price Institute, Brian Hosking, May 1976. Johannesburg, generously arranged for permis- sion to collect and for the loan of specimens DESCRIPTION for study. Dr. C. B. Cox, University of London, King's College, identified the associ- Among the captorhinid taxa used for com- ated anomodont material. parisons here, Captorhinus and Eocaptorhinus are by far the best known, being represented by ABBREVIATIONS a number of well-preserved skulls. Price (1935) INSTITUTIONS and Fox and Bowman (1966) have produced OU, University of Oklahoma descriptions of Captorhinus, and Heaton (1979) QG, National Museums of Rhodesia has described Eocaptorhinus in even greater ANATOMICAL detail. Considering that the two taxa differ only ang, angular pfr, prefrontal in the number of tooth rows (providing that one art, articular pm, premaxilla accepts the hypothesis that they are different at bo, basioccipital po, postorbital all), this skull type is as well known as any den, dentary ps, parasphenoid Recent form. Romeria and Protocaptorhinus, fr, frontal pt, pterygoid however, are known from three and two skulls, ju, jugal qj, quadratojugal respectively, all of which lack significant por- la, lacrimal qu, quadrate mx, maxilla sm, septomaxilla tions of the palate (Clark and Carroll, 1973). na, nasal sq, squamosal The currently known material of Romeria and pa, parietal st, supratemporal Protocaptorhinus and the excellent specimens pal, palatine vo, vomer of Captorhinus and Eocaptorhinus were avail- pf, postfrontal able for comparison with the Rhodesian Pro- tocaptorhinus during the course of this study. SYSTEMATICS In many cases comparisons had to be restricted to Captorhinus and Eocaptorhinus because of FAMILY CAPTORHINIDAE the poor preservation of Romeria and Protocap- Protocaptorhinus Clark and Carroll, 1973 torhinus specimens. In the following descrip- tion, Protocaptorhinus always refers to the Protocaptorhinus, sp. North American material, the Rhodesian skulls SPECIMENS: QG 1105, anterior portion of are not identified as Protocaptorhinus until the skull; QG 1106, posterior portion of skull (see Discussion section. figs. 1-3). LOCALITY: Small patch of badlands lying at SKULL the base of a large hill just south of the con- fluence of the Sengwa and Lutope rivers, PREMAXILLA: The premaxilla is best seen on 18°07' S. latitude, 28°12' E. longitude'; Gokwe the right side of QG 1105 where only a portion Tribal Trust Area, Middle Zambezi Basin, of the internarial region is badly damaged. The preserved areas agree closely with Captorhinus 'UTM grid reference PL283009 on 1:50,000 series of and Eocaptorhinus as described by Fox and Rhodesia, sheet 1828A. Bowman (1966) and Heaton (1979). Although 1979 GAFFNEY AND MC KENNA: CAPTORHINID 3 all the premaxillary teeth are damaged to some SEPTOMAXILLA: Although one was presum- extent, it does seem clear that each bone has ably present, the septomaxilla is not visible. four teeth. Protocaptorhinus, Captorhinus, and LACRIMAL: The lacrimal is preserved best on Eocaptorhinus have four or five premaxillary the right side of QG 1105 and extends from the teeth and a distinct size gradation in these teeth anterior edge of the orbit to the posterior edge with the anteriormost being longest and widest of the nares. It compares closely with Pro- and the posteriormost being shortest and small- tocaptorhinus, Captorhinus, and Eocap- est. The Rhodesian specimen is consistent with torhinus. these characters but the anteriormost tooth does NASAL: The limits and dorsal surface of the not seem to be relatively as large as that seen right nasal are clearly preserved in QG 1105 in the North American taxa. although the area bordering the nares is some- MAXILLA: Both maxillae are preserved in what damaged. The left nasal is broken and QG 1105, but the left maxilla is somewhat crushed but agrees in morphology with the crushed. The external limits and shape of the right. The only distinction between the nasal of maxilla agree with that seen in Protocap- the Rhodesian skull and Captorhinus is the torhinus, Captorhinus, and Eocaptorhinus. The slightly more extensive prefrontal contact and anterior limit of the maxilla forms part of the less extensive lacrimal contact in the former. narial margin, there is a mid-length dorsal PREFRONTAL: The prefrontal in QG 1105 is swelling, and a posterior jugal contact; all as in badly damaged on the left side, but complete the New World forms. The mid-length swelling on the right. It forms the border of the orbit coincides with the position of the largest max- anterodorsally and extends forward to separate illary teeth, some of which may become dis- the nasal and lacrimal for much of their tinctly larger than the other maxillary teeth. lengths. It agrees in detail with Protocap- The Rhodesian form, however, has maxillary torhinus, Captorhinus, and Eocaptorhinus. teeth that are somewhat more similar to each FRONTAL: The frontal is best seen in QG other in size and conspicuously enlarged ca- 1105 but fragments of it as well as the fronto- niniform teeth are absent. Bolt and De Mar parietal suture are preserved in QG 1106. The (1975) noted some variation in this feature in frontal agrees closely with Protocaptorhinus, Captorhinus. Captorhinus, and Eocaptorhinus. The lower jaws have not been removed from PARIETAL: QG 1106 has a complete right the skulls of the Rhodesian specimens but it is parietal and portions of the left preserved but possible to determine that a single row of teeth the posteromedial surface is damaged making is present as in Protocaptorhinus and Eocap- the midline parietal suture and the pineal fora- torhinus. men impossible to determine. The parietal in The number of maxillary teeth is in doubt the Rhodesian form differs slightly from Pro- because of the presence of the lower jaws, but tocaptorhinus, Captorhinus, Eocaptorhinus, on the right side 19 maxillary teeth are visible, and romeriids in apparently having a medial whereas the damaged left side shows evidence constriction about midway along its length. of a minimum of 12 teeth. Heaton (1979) re- Also, as restored here, the proportions of the ported 17 to 22 teeth in Eocaptorhinus, and parietal are somewhat closer to those seen in Clark and Carroll (1973) stated that Protocap- Romeria (Clark and Carroll, 1973) in that the torhinus had 18 to 22.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptile Family Tree
    Reptile Family Tree - Peters 2015 Distribution of Scales, Scutes, Hair and Feathers Fish scales 100 Ichthyostega Eldeceeon 1990.7.1 Pederpes 91 Eldeceeon holotype Gephyrostegus watsoni Eryops 67 Solenodonsaurus 87 Proterogyrinus 85 100 Chroniosaurus Eoherpeton 94 72 Chroniosaurus PIN3585/124 98 Seymouria Chroniosuchus Kotlassia 58 94 Westlothiana Casineria Utegenia 84 Brouffia 95 78 Amphibamus 71 93 77 Coelostegus Cacops Paleothyris Adelospondylus 91 78 82 99 Hylonomus 100 Brachydectes Protorothyris MCZ1532 Eocaecilia 95 91 Protorothyris CM 8617 77 95 Doleserpeton 98 Gerobatrachus Protorothyris MCZ 2149 Rana 86 52 Microbrachis 92 Elliotsmithia Pantylus 93 Apsisaurus 83 92 Anthracodromeus 84 85 Aerosaurus 95 85 Utaherpeton 82 Varanodon 95 Tuditanus 91 98 61 90 Eoserpeton Varanops Diplocaulus Varanosaurus FMNH PR 1760 88 100 Sauropleura Varanosaurus BSPHM 1901 XV20 78 Ptyonius 98 89 Archaeothyris Scincosaurus 77 84 Ophiacodon 95 Micraroter 79 98 Batropetes Rhynchonkos Cutleria 59 Nikkasaurus 95 54 Biarmosuchus Silvanerpeton 72 Titanophoneus Gephyrostegeus bohemicus 96 Procynosuchus 68 100 Megazostrodon Mammal 88 Homo sapiens 100 66 Stenocybus hair 91 94 IVPP V18117 69 Galechirus 69 97 62 Suminia Niaftasuchus 65 Microurania 98 Urumqia 91 Bruktererpeton 65 IVPP V 18120 85 Venjukovia 98 100 Thuringothyris MNG 7729 Thuringothyris MNG 10183 100 Eodicynodon Dicynodon 91 Cephalerpeton 54 Reiszorhinus Haptodus 62 Concordia KUVP 8702a 95 59 Ianthasaurus 87 87 Concordia KUVP 96/95 85 Edaphosaurus Romeria primus 87 Glaucosaurus Romeria texana Secodontosaurus
    [Show full text]
  • HOVASAURUS BOULEI, an AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN from the UPPER PERMIAN of MADAGASCAR by P.J
    99 Palaeont. afr., 24 (1981) HOVASAURUS BOULEI, AN AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN FROM THE UPPER PERMIAN OF MADAGASCAR by P.J. Currie Provincial Museum ofAlberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T5N OM6, Canada ABSTRACT HovasauTUs is the most specialized of four known genera of tangasaurid eosuchians, and is the most common vertebrate recovered from the Lower Sakamena Formation (Upper Per­ mian, Dzulfia n Standard Stage) of Madagascar. The tail is more than double the snout-vent length, and would have been used as a powerful swimming appendage. Ribs are pachyostotic in large animals. The pectoral girdle is low, but massively developed ventrally. The front limb would have been used for swimming and for direction control when swimming. Copious amounts of pebbles were swallowed for ballast. The hind limbs would have been efficient for terrestrial locomotion at maturity. The presence of long growth series for Ho vasaurus and the more terrestrial tan~saurid ThadeosauTUs presents a unique opportunity to study differences in growth strategies in two closely related Permian genera. At birth, the limbs were relatively much shorter in Ho vasaurus, but because of differences in growth rates, the limbs of Thadeosau­ rus are relatively shorter at maturity. It is suggested that immature specimens of Ho vasauTUs spent most of their time in the water, whereas adults spent more time on land for mating, lay­ ing eggs and/or range dispersal. Specilizations in the vertebrae and carpus indicate close re­ lationship between Youngina and the tangasaurids, but eliminate tangasaurids from consider­ ation as ancestors of other aquatic eosuchians, archosaurs or sauropterygians. CONTENTS Page ABREVIATIONS . ..... ... ......... .......... ... ......... ..... ... ..... .. .... 101 INTRODUCTION .
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • A Small Lepidosauromorph Reptile from the Early Triassic of Poland
    A SMALL LEPIDOSAUROMORPH REPTILE FROM THE EARLY TRIASSIC OF POLAND SUSAN E. EVANS and MAGDALENA BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA Evans, S.E. and Borsuk−Białynicka, M. 2009. A small lepidosauromorph reptile from the Early Triassic of Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica 65, 179–202. The Early Triassic karst deposits of Czatkowice quarry near Kraków, southern Poland, has yielded a diversity of fish, amphibians and small reptiles. Two of these reptiles are lepido− sauromorphs, a group otherwise very poorly represented in the Triassic record. The smaller of them, Sophineta cracoviensis gen. et sp. n., is described here. In Sophineta the unspecial− ised vertebral column is associated with the fairly derived skull structure, including the tall facial process of the maxilla, reduced lacrimal, and pleurodonty, that all resemble those of early crown−group lepidosaurs rather then stem−taxa. Cladistic analysis places this new ge− nus as the sister group of Lepidosauria, displacing the relictual Middle Jurassic genus Marmoretta and bringing the origins of Lepidosauria closer to a realistic time frame. Key words: Reptilia, Lepidosauria, Triassic, phylogeny, Czatkowice, Poland. Susan E. Evans [[email protected]], Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Uni− versity College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. Magdalena Borsuk−Białynicka [[email protected]], Institut Paleobiologii PAN, Twarda 51/55, PL−00−818 Warszawa, Poland. Received 8 March 2006, accepted 9 January 2007 180 SUSAN E. EVANS and MAGDALENA BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA INTRODUCTION Amongst living reptiles, lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards, amphisbaenians, and tuatara) form the largest and most successful group with more than 7 000 widely distributed species. The two main lepidosaurian clades are Rhynchocephalia (the living Sphenodon and its extinct relatives) and Squamata (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians).
    [Show full text]
  • Tiago Rodrigues Simões
    Diapsid Phylogeny and the Origin and Early Evolution of Squamates by Tiago Rodrigues Simões A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Tiago Rodrigues Simões, 2018 ABSTRACT Squamate reptiles comprise over 10,000 living species and hundreds of fossil species of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians, with their origins dating back at least as far back as the Middle Jurassic. Despite this enormous diversity and a long evolutionary history, numerous fundamental questions remain to be answered regarding the early evolution and origin of this major clade of tetrapods. Such long-standing issues include identifying the oldest fossil squamate, when exactly did squamates originate, and why morphological and molecular analyses of squamate evolution have strong disagreements on fundamental aspects of the squamate tree of life. Additionally, despite much debate, there is no existing consensus over the composition of the Lepidosauromorpha (the clade that includes squamates and their sister taxon, the Rhynchocephalia), making the squamate origin problem part of a broader and more complex reptile phylogeny issue. In this thesis, I provide a series of taxonomic, phylogenetic, biogeographic and morpho-functional contributions to shed light on these problems. I describe a new taxon that overwhelms previous hypothesis of iguanian biogeography and evolution in Gondwana (Gueragama sulamericana). I re-describe and assess the functional morphology of some of the oldest known articulated lizards in the world (Eichstaettisaurus schroederi and Ardeosaurus digitatellus), providing clues to the ancestry of geckoes, and the early evolution of their scansorial behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Modestoetal2007.Pdf
    Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082© 2007 The Linnean Society of London? 2007 149•• 237262 Original Article SKULL OF EARLY PERMIAN CAPTORHINID REPTILES. P. MODESTO ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 149, 237–262. With 12 figures The skull and the palaeoecological significance of Labidosaurus hamatus, a captorhinid reptile from the Lower Permian of Texas SEAN P. MODESTO1*, DIANE M. SCOTT2, DAVID S. BERMAN1, JOHANNES MÜLLER2 and ROBERT R. REISZ2 1Section of Vertebrate Palaeontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA 2Department of Biology, University of Toronto in Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada Received May 2005; accepted for publication February 2006 The cranial skeleton of the large captorhinid reptile Labidosaurus hamatus, known only from the Lower Permian of Texas, is described on the basis of new, undescribed specimens. Labidosaurus is distinguished from other captorhin- ids by the more extreme sloping of the ventral (alveolar) margin of the premaxilla, a low dorsum sellae of the para- basisphenoid, a reduced prootic, a narrow stapes, and a relatively small foramen intermandibularis medius. Despite the presence of a single row of teeth in each jaw, the skull of Labidosaurus resembles most closely those of mor- adisaurines, the large multiple-tooth-rowed captorhinids of the latest Early and Middle Permian. A phylogenetic analysis confirms that the single-tooth-rowed L. hamatus is related most closely to moradisaurines within Cap- torhinidae, a relationship that supports the hypothesis of a diphyletic origin for multiple rows of marginal teeth in captorhinids (in the genus Captorhinus and in the clade Moradisaurinae).
    [Show full text]
  • Clades™ Prehistoric Card Game a Clade Is a Section of the Evolutionary Family Tree­—Basically Any Branch, Including All Its Sub-Branches
    CLADES™ PREHISTORIC Card Game A clade is a section of the evolutionary family tree —basically any branch, including all its sub-branches. A clade is a family of organisms, or living things, that are all more closely related to each other than they are to any other organisms. In this game you match cards according to their clades. Contents: Deck of 83 Clades Prehistoric cards. Includes 27 cards of each color and 2 bonus cards. There are also 5 animal description cards not used in play. Object: Spot matching card triples to collect the biggest animal pile! Setup Deal 1 face-down card to each player as their personal card. For now, players keep these cards face-down and don’t look at them. Deal 12 face-down shared cards to the middle of the play area. If you’re learning or teaching the game: • Before dealing, set aside the bonus cards and the cards showing only one or two animals. Play with just the cards showing three animals. • Deal 7 shared cards instead of 12. CLADESPrehistoricRules2.indd 1 10/17/17 10:15 AM All players help flip the 12 shared cards face-up. Sort the cards into three Making Triples rows according to their clades: top for Mammalia (mammals), middle for Sauropsida (sauropsids, or reptiles and birds), and bottom for Arthropoda In Clades Prehistoric, any two cards can make a triple with exactly one other (arthropods, or “bugs”). When the table is ready, each player picks up their card in the deck. personal card and looks at it.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Peptides in Reptiles
    Pharmaceuticals 2014, 7, 723-753; doi:10.3390/ph7060723 OPEN ACCESS pharmaceuticals ISSN 1424-8247 www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Review Antimicrobial Peptides in Reptiles Monique L. van Hoek National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, and School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, MS1H8, 10910 University Blvd, Manassas, VA 20110, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-703-993-4273; Fax: +1-703-993-7019. Received: 6 March 2014; in revised form: 9 May 2014 / Accepted: 12 May 2014 / Published: 10 June 2014 Abstract: Reptiles are among the oldest known amniotes and are highly diverse in their morphology and ecological niches. These animals have an evolutionarily ancient innate-immune system that is of great interest to scientists trying to identify new and useful antimicrobial peptides. Significant work in the last decade in the fields of biochemistry, proteomics and genomics has begun to reveal the complexity of reptilian antimicrobial peptides. Here, the current knowledge about antimicrobial peptides in reptiles is reviewed, with specific examples in each of the four orders: Testudines (turtles and tortosises), Sphenodontia (tuataras), Squamata (snakes and lizards), and Crocodilia (crocodilans). Examples are presented of the major classes of antimicrobial peptides expressed by reptiles including defensins, cathelicidins, liver-expressed peptides (hepcidin and LEAP-2), lysozyme, crotamine, and others. Some of these peptides have been identified and tested for their antibacterial or antiviral activity; others are only predicted as possible genes from genomic sequencing. Bioinformatic analysis of the reptile genomes is presented, revealing many predicted candidate antimicrobial peptides genes across this diverse class. The study of how these ancient creatures use antimicrobial peptides within their innate immune systems may reveal new understandings of our mammalian innate immune system and may also provide new and powerful antimicrobial peptides as scaffolds for potential therapeutic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile” Diversity and Evolution George A
    “Reptile” Diversity and Evolution George A. Lozano Department of Biology University of Ottawa Summary Sauropsids Turtles Diapsids/Saurians Plesiosaurs † and ichthyosaurs † Lepidosaurs Tuatara Squamates (snakes, geckos, iguanas, monitors ) Archosaurs (crocodiles, dinosaurs, pterosaurs ) Dinosaurs 2 George A. Lozano Amniota Synapsida Sauropsida Diapsida Turtles Ancestral amniotes & Turtles Turtles - Testudina 250 species Carapace (vertebrae and ribs) Appendicular girdles INSIDE the shell Beak, no teeth (along with aves) Ear ossicle columella (ind?) 4 George A. Lozano Sauropsida Diapsida/Sauria Turtles 250 Archosaurs Ichthyosaurs† Lepidosaurs Plesiosaurs† 9.1K 7K Ear ossicle collumella, 3 rd ind. evol.) Lepidosaurs “scaly” reptiles 6700 species : 4000 lizards, 2700 snakes Tuatara: ancestral diapsid skull Squamata: derived diapsid skull, hemipenes Iguanas Geckos Snakes Skinks Gila monsters, monitor lizards, Komodo dragon 6 George A. Lozano Tuatara Turtles Squamates Modified Euryapsid: Aves diapsid Plesiosaur Ichthyosaur Snakes 8 George A. Lozano Sauropsida Diapsida Turtles Archosaurs Crocodiles Dinosaurs Pterosaurs† Dinosaurs Ornithischians† Saurischians •Ceratopsids •Duck-billed dino Sauropods† Theropods •Stegosaurus •Ankylosaurus Dinosaurs Ornithischians† Saurischians •-ceratops (uni, tri…) •Duck-billed dino Sauropods† Theropods •Stegosaurus •Diplodocus •Ankylosaurus •Brachiosaurus T. rex † Velociraptor † Birds 12 George A. Lozano Sauropod and ornithischian (ankylosaurus) 13 George A. Lozano 14 George A. Lozano Dinosaurs
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Environmental Drivers of Paleozoic Tetrapod Dispersal Across Pangaea
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07623-x OPEN Physical and environmental drivers of Paleozoic tetrapod dispersal across Pangaea Neil Brocklehurst1,2, Emma M. Dunne3, Daniel D. Cashmore3 &Jӧrg Frӧbisch2,4 The Carboniferous and Permian were crucial intervals in the establishment of terrestrial ecosystems, which occurred alongside substantial environmental and climate changes throughout the globe, as well as the final assembly of the supercontinent of Pangaea. The fl 1234567890():,; in uence of these changes on tetrapod biogeography is highly contentious, with some authors suggesting a cosmopolitan fauna resulting from a lack of barriers, and some iden- tifying provincialism. Here we carry out a detailed historical biogeographic analysis of late Paleozoic tetrapods to study the patterns of dispersal and vicariance. A likelihood-based approach to infer ancestral areas is combined with stochastic mapping to assess rates of vicariance and dispersal. Both the late Carboniferous and the end-Guadalupian are char- acterised by a decrease in dispersal and a vicariance peak in amniotes and amphibians. The first of these shifts is attributed to orogenic activity, the second to increasing climate heterogeneity. 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK. 2 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany. 3 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. 4 Institut
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Arizona Vertebrate Paleontology
    Heckert, A.B., and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2005, Vertebrate Paleontology in Arizona. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin No. 29. 168 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ARIZONA VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY CALEB LEWIS1, ANDREW B. HECKERT2 and SPENCER G. LUCAS1 1New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375; 2Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32067, Boone, NC 28608-2067 Abstract—We provide a bibliography of Arizona vertebrate paleontology that consits of approximately 625 references covering vertebrate occurrences ranging in age from Devonian to Holocene. Not surpris- ingly, references to Triassic and Neogene vertebrates are the most numerous, reflecting the particular strengths of the Arizona record. We break the bibliography down into various taxic groups and provide a complete, unified bibliography at the end of the paper. Keyworks: Arizona, bibliography, fossil, vertebrate, paleontology INTRODUCTION tracks from the Paleozoic and Mesozoic of the state. The Lower Permian Coconino and Lower Jurassic Navajo sandstones in Our aim in presenting a bibliography of Arizona vertebrate northern Arizona are especially known for their vertebrate and paleontology is to provide a valuable research tool for all those invertebrate trackways. conducting vertebrate paleontology research in Arizona. This Abstracts were generally omitted from the bibliography bibliography will also be made available as individual, download - partly to save space, but also due to the difficulty in tracking able Endnote® libraries on the New Mexico Museum of Natural down all published abstracts, many of which exist only in the History and Science paleontological resources website (www. “gray literature” and are duplicated by subsequent full-length nmfossils.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Elachistosuchus Huenei Janensch, 1949 (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Upper Triassic of Germany and Its Relevance for the Origin of Sauria
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Anatomy of the Enigmatic Reptile Elachistosuchus huenei Janensch, 1949 (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Upper Triassic of Germany and Its Relevance for the Origin of Sauria Gabriela Sobral1☯*, Hans-Dieter Sues2☯, Johannes Müller1☯ 1 Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin, Germany, 2 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, MRC 121, Washington, DC, United States of America ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Sobral G, Sues H-D, Müller J (2015) Abstract Anatomy of the Enigmatic Reptile Elachistosuchus huenei Janensch, 1949 (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the The holotype and only known specimen of the enigmatic small reptile Elachistosuchus hue- Upper Triassic of Germany and Its Relevance for the nei Janensch, 1949 from the Upper Triassic (Norian) Arnstadt Formation of Saxony-Anhalt Origin of Sauria. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0135114. μ doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135114 (Germany) is redescribed using CT scans of the material. This re-examination revealed new information on the morphology of this taxon, including previously unknown parts of the Editor: Shree Ram Singh, National Cancer Institute, UNITED STATES skeleton such as the palate, braincase, and shoulder girdle. Elachistosuchus is diagnosed especially by the presence of the posterolateral process of the frontal, the extension of the Received: January 27, 2015 maxillary tooth row to the posterior margin of the orbit, the free posterior process of the Accepted: July 19, 2015 jugal, and the notched anterior margin of the interclavicle. Phylogenetic analyses using two Published: September 9, 2015 recently published character-taxon matrices recovered conflicting results for the phyloge- Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all netic position of Elachistosuchus–either as an archosauromorph, as a lepidosauromorph or copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, as a more basal, non-saurian diapsid.
    [Show full text]