DOCSLIB.ORG

Operative Part of the Verdict

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operative Part of the Verdict SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE СУД БОСНЕ И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Case No.: X-KR-05/24 Date: Delivered 29 July 2008 Published 13 January 2009 Before: Judge Hilmo Vučinić, Presiding Judge Paul Melchior Brilman Judge Shireen Avis Fisher PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. MILOŠ STUPAR, MILENKO TRIFUNOVIĆ, BRANO DŽINIĆ, ALEKSANDAR RADOVANOVIĆ, SLOBODAN JAKOVLJEVIĆ, VELIBOR MAKSIMOVIĆ, DRAGIŠA ŽIVANOVIĆ, BRANISLAV MEDAN and MILOVAN MATIĆ FIRST INSTANCE VERDICT Counsel for the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mr. Ibro Bulić Mr. Kwai-Hong Ip Counsel for the Accused Miloš Stupar: Ms. Ozrenka Jakšić Mr. Radivoje Lazarević Counsel for the Accused Milenko Trifunović: Mr. Rade Golić Mr. Petko Pavlović Counsel for the Accused Brano Džinić: Ms. Suzana Tomanović Mr. Boriša Ilić Counsel for the Accused Aleksandar Radovanović: Mr. Dragan Gotovac Ms. Nada Mandić Counsel for the Accused Slobodan Jakovljević: Mr. Boško Čegar Mr. Slavko Aščerić Counsel for the Accused Velibor Maksimović: Mr. Danilo Mrkaljević Ms. Vera Lazić Counsel for the Accused Dragiša Živanović: Mr. Stanko Petrović Mr. Ratko Gengo Counsel for the Accused Branislav Medan: Mr. Borislav Jamina Mr. Zoran Kisin Counsel for the Accused Milovan Matić: Mr. Miloš Perić Mr. Ratko Jovičić Case No. X-KR-05/24 2 29 July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS VERDICT .................................................................................................................................9 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .......................................................................................................15 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS OF EVIDENCE.......................................................................17 A. Generally .....................................................................................................................17 B. Credibility of S4 ..........................................................................................................18 1. Plea Agreements and Immunity Generally.........................................................18 2. Discrepancies between Investigative Statements................................................20 3. Credibility of Facts................................................................................................22 C. Mitrović Credibility....................................................................................................22 III. SUMMARY OF EVENTS ......................................................................................................26 A. Background and Summary of Events.......................................................................26 1. Preparation for Attack on Srebrenica.................................................................26 2. Attack on Srebrenica and Aftermath ..................................................................27 3. Participation of RS MUP Units in the Aftermath ..............................................30 4. Widespread and Systematic Attack.....................................................................32 5. Structure of the 2nd Šekovići Detachment ...........................................................33 B. Operations of the 2nd Šekovići Detachment and the 3rd Skelani Platoon...............34 1. 10 July – 11 July ....................................................................................................34 2. 12 July.....................................................................................................................35 3. 13 July: Sandići Meadow......................................................................................36 4. 13 July: Kravica Warehouse ................................................................................37 5. 14 July – 15 July ....................................................................................................40 C. The Execution at the Kravica Warehouse................................................................42 IV. LAW OF GENOCIDE ...........................................................................................................52 A. Elements of the Crime ................................................................................................52 B. Actus Reus ....................................................................................................................54 C. Mens Rea......................................................................................................................54 1. Intent to Kill..........................................................................................................55 2. Genocidal Intent ....................................................................................................56 a. “Aim” (“Intent”)................................................................................................56 Case No. X-KR-05/24 3 29 July 2008 b. “to Destroy” ......................................................................................................56 c. “In Whole or in Part”.........................................................................................57 d. “A national, ethnical, racial or religious group” ...............................................57 D. Proof of Genocidal Intent...........................................................................................58 E. Findings on Protected Group.....................................................................................59 1. The Accused knew that the Victims of the Killings at the Kravica Warehouse were Bosniaks from Srebrenica...........................................................59 2. The Bosniaks of Srebrenica were a “Part” of a “Protected Group” ................60 V. GENOCIDAL PLAN AND CONTEXT – THE “LIBERATION” OF SREBRENICA ......................63 A. The “Liberation” of Srebrenica ................................................................................63 B. Phase One: Military Takeover of Srebrenica...........................................................64 C. “The Second Part”: Phase Two – Eradication of the Bosniaks..............................67 1. The Role of the Security and Intelligence Organs in Phase Two......................69 2. The Role of the MUP forces in Phase Two..........................................................70 D. Phase Two: Eradication of Bosniaks – Forcible Transfer ......................................71 1. Preparation for the Transfer Plan.......................................................................71 2. The Deception ........................................................................................................73 E. Phase Two: Eradication of Bosniaks – Killing of the Men......................................75 1. Preparation for the Killing ...................................................................................75 2. The Killing Plan: 12 July 1995 .............................................................................78 a. The Killing Plan: Potočari.................................................................................79 b. The Killing Plan: The Column..........................................................................82 3. The Killing Plan: 13 July 1995 .............................................................................87 a. Killing................................................................................................................87 i. Ambush, Shelling, and Murder....................................................................87 ii. Organized Multiple Killings.......................................................................87 b. Induced Surrender .............................................................................................88 c. Transfer and Collection for Execution ..............................................................88 d. Simultaneity ......................................................................................................89 4. The Killing Plan: 14 July – 19 July 1995.............................................................90 5. No Deviation from the Killing Plan .....................................................................91 F. Phase Two: Eradication of Bosniaks – The Decision to use the MUP Special Police to Implement the Plan Came From the Top.........................................93 1. The Order to Use the MUP Special Police came “From the Top”....................93 2. Importance of the MUP Special Police................................................................95 3.The Mission of the MUP came “From the Top”..................................................96 a. Civilian Structures.............................................................................................96 b. Military Structures ............................................................................................97 Case No. X-KR-05/24 4 29 July 2008 4. Activities of the MUP were known “To the Top”...............................................99 5. The Killings at Kravica were Consistent with the Plan “By the Top” ...........101 G. Genocide was Committed in Srebrenica in Accordance with this Plan ..............102 VI. THE ACCUSED – GENOCIDAL INTENT ............................................................................105 A. The Accused knew the Basic Elements of the Genocidal Plan .............................105 1. Timing...................................................................................................................107 2. Content .................................................................................................................107
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-03-68-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 June 2006 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Original: English Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Carmel Agius, Presiding Judge Hans Henrik Brydensholt Judge Albin Eser Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 June 2006 PROSECUTOR v. NASER ORIĆ JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Jan Wubben Ms. Patricia Viseur Sellers Mr. Gramsci Di Fazio Ms. JoAnne Richardson Mr. José Doria Counsel for the Accused: Ms. Vasvija Vidović Mr. John Jones Case No.: IT-03-68-T 30 June 2006 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. THE ACCUSED 1 B. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES 2 1. Charges of Murder and Cruel Treatment 2 2. Charges of Wanton Destruction 3 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EVALUATION OF THE EVIDENCE 5 A. GENERAL MATTERS REGARDING THE ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE 5 B. AUTHENTICITY OF EXHIBITS 8 1. Prosecution Objections to the Admission of Documents Tendered by the Defence 9 2. Defence Objections to the Admission of Documents Tendered by the Prosecution 9 (a) Objections Based on Lack or Insufficient Chain of Custody 9 (b) Objections to Exhibits Which Have not Been Presented to any Witness 11 (c) Objections Based on the Nature of the Document 11 i. Computer Files 11 ii. ‘Combat Action Information Sheets’ from the ABiH 2nd Corps 12 (d) Objections Based on the Source of the Document 12 i. Documents Provided by the Republika Srpska Liaison Office 12 ii. Documents Provided by Republika Srpska Bureau for Co-operation With the Tribunal 13 iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Miroslav Deronjic, “Bearing in Mind His Genuine Remorse Expressed on Numerous Occasions During His Contacts with OTP Investigators”.521
    Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-02-61-S Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 March 2004 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Presiding Judge Carmel A. Agius Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 March 2004 PROSECUTOR v. MIROSLAV DERONJI] SENTENCING JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Mark B. Harmon Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Slobodan Cvijeti} Mr. Slobodan Ze~evi} Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. THE ACCUSED.................................................................................................................................. 2 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 4 A. OVERVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS ....................................................................................................... 4 B. PLEA AGREEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 6 C. TESTIMONY OF THE ACCUSED............................................................................................................. 7 D. SENTENCING HEARING
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the Use of the Media
    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations The Hague, 30 June 2006 Nations Unies PROSECUTOR V. NASER ORIĆ SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT International Please find below the summary of the judgement today read out by Judge Agius: Criminal Tribunal for the former Introduction Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is sitting today to International pour deliver its Judgement in the trial of Naser Orić. l’ex-Yougoslavie This case deals with crimes of murder and cruel treatment of prisoners and of wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages alleged to have happened in Srebrenica in 1992 and 1993 for which the Accused was indicted on 13 March 2003. The Accused stood trial for the following charges: first, under COUNT 1, he is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute of the Tribunal (“Statute”) for murder as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. Under COUNT 2, the Accused is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute for cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. The Prosecution never alleged that these crimes of murder and cruel treatment were committed by the Accused, but only accused him pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Statute as being responsible for these crimes committed by his subordinates whilst he was holding a position of superior authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Zakon O Nacionalnom Parku „Drina“
    ZAKON O NACIONALNOM PARKU „DRINA“ Član 1. Ovim zakonom uređuju se granice, zone i režimi zaštite, pitanja upravljanja, zaštite i razvoja Nacionalnog parka „Drina“ (u daljem tekstu: Nacionalni park). Član 2. Nacionalni park je područje izuzetnih prirodnih vrijednosti, koje čini klisurasto- kanjonska dolina rijeke Drine kao jedna od najznačajnijih riječnih dolina Republike Srpske, sa brojnim staništima endemičnih i reliktnih biljnih vrsta, te izuzetnim diverzitetom flore i faune, koje je namijenjeno očuvanju postojećih prirodnih vrijednosti i resursa, ukupne pejzažne, geološke i biološke raznovrsnosti, kao i zadovoljenju naučnih, obrazovnih, duhovnih, estetskih, kulturnih, turističkih, zdravstveno-rekreativnih potreba i ostalih aktivnosti u skladu sa načelima zaštite prirode i održivog razvoja. Član 3. Na pitanja od značaja za zaštitu, razvoj, unapređivanje, upravljanje, finansiranje, kaznene odredbe i održivo korišćenje Nacionalnog parka koja nisu uređena ovim zakonom primjenjuju se posebni propisi kojim se uređuju pitanja nacionalnih parkova, zaštite prirode i drugi zakoni i podzakonski akti kojima se reguliše ova oblast. Član 4. (1) Nacionalni park prostire se na području opštine Srebrenica u ukupnoj površini od 6.315,32 hektara. (2) Opis spoljne granice Nacionalnog parka: Početna tačka opisa granice obuhvata Nacionalnog parka je u tromeđi opština Srebrenica, Višegrad i Rogatica (tačka A). Granica ide ka sjeveroistoku do tromeđe opština Srebrenica, Višegrad i Bajine Bašte u Srbiji (tačka B). Od tačke A do tačke B, granica ide jezerom Perućac, odnosno granicom između opština Srebrenica i Višegrad. Od tromeđe opština Srebrenica, Višegrad i Bajine Bašte u Srbiji (tačka B), granica ide do krune brane Perućac (tačka V). Od tačke B do tačke V, granica ide jezerom Perućac, odnosno granicom između Bosne i Hercegovine i Srbije.
    [Show full text]
  • Skupština Opštine Srebrenica Odluke, Zaključci, Programi I Javni Konkursi
    BILTEN SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA BROJ: 1/2015 Srebrenica, Januar 2015. god. SKUPŠTINA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE, ZAKLJUČCI, PROGRAMI I JAVNI KONKURSI Broj:01-022-185 /14 ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Srebrenica, 26.12.2014. god. Broj:01-022-184/14 Na osnovu člana 31. Zakona o budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske Srebrenica, 26.12.2014. god. ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 121/12 ), a u skladu sa Zakonom o trezoru ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 16/05 i Na osnovu člana 5. Zakona o Budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske 92/09) i člana 30. Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni glasnik ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 121/12), člana 30. Zakona Republike Srpske", broj: 101/04, 42/05, 118/05 i 98/13) i člana 32. Statuta Opštine Srebrenica ("Bilten opštine Srebrenica", broj: 10/05), o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj 101/04, 42/05,118/05 i 98/13) i člana 32. Statuta Opštine Srebrenica 26.12.2014. godine je usvojila: ("Bilten opštine Srebrenica", broj: 10/05), Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj 26.12.2014. godine je Odluku usvojila: o izvršenju Budžeta opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu Odluku Član 1. o usvajanju Budžeta opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu Ovom Odlukom propisuje se način izvršenja Budžeta Opštine Član 1. Srebrenica za 2015. godinu (u daljem tekstu: budžet). Budžet opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu sastoji se od: Ova Odluka će se sprovoditi u saglasnosti sa Zakonom o budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske i Zakonom o trezoru. 1. Ukupni prihodi i primici: 6.883.00000 KM, od toga: a) Redovni prihodi tekućeg perioda: 6.115.500,00 KM; Sve Odluke, zaključci i rješenja koji se odnose na budžet moraju biti u b) Tekući grantovi i donacije: 767.500,00 KM.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina O O Indictment
    Sud £¡H / Cyfl GnX Kfivicno cdjeljenje ¡ Apelaciono odjeljenj«/ KpMBKSHo cftjejo€hbe K Ane/ia^hoHO OAfefbert* Odjcl I i Oc je III / Ofljs/i I * Ofl|»/i II Odsjek za sudsfcu upravu/Oflejes 33 cy/^cicy ynpsoy BOSNIA AND HERZEGO PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BIH fflGWJ) U^/vfA q^ SARAJEVO Number: KT-RZ-10/05 Sarajevo, 12 December 2005 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Preliminary Hearing Judge - Pursuant to Article 35 (2) (h) and Article 226 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code of BiH, I hereby issue the O INDICTMENT AGAINST: 1. STUPAR MILOS, a.k.a. "MISO", son of Slavojka (maiden name Ninic), born 7 December 1963 in TiSci, Sekovici where he is holding permanent residence, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, police officer, married, father of four children, served the Army in 1982 in Nis, average financial situation, with no previous conviction, criminal proceedings are being conducted against him for a criminal offence of light bodily injury, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH number: X-KRN-05/25 to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 2. TRIFUNOVlt MILENKO, a.k.a "COP", son of Ivan and Milojka Obradovic, O born 7 January 1968 in the village of Kostolomci, Srebrenica Municipality, residing in Skelani bb in his private house, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, JMBG: 0701967183154, trader, unemployed, completed Vocational Trade School, married, father of two minor children, expecting a newborn child, served the Army in 1987 in Pec and Prizren, with no military rank or medal, registered in military records of Srebrenica, indigent financial situation, no other criminal proceedings are being conducted against him, with no previous conviction, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Član 4
    SLUŽBENI GLASNIK OPŠTINE SREBRENICA BROJ: 2/2019 Srebrenica, 15.10.2019. god. SKUPŠTINA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE, ZAKLJUČCI, PROGRAMI I JAVNI KONKURSI AKTI NAČELNIKA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Član 4. Broj: 01-022-122/19 Ova odluka ne predstavlja osnov za promjenu Srebrenica, 02.04.2019. god. imovinsko pravnih odnosa u pogledu predmetnih prostorija koje se daju na korištenje, ašto će biti U skladu sa članom 39. Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi definisano i samim ugovorom. ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 97/16), člana 34. Statuta opštine Srebrenica ("Službeni glasnik opštine Srebrenica", broj: 2/18), a na prijedlog Član 5. Načelnika opštine, Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj dana 24.04.2019. Ova Odluka stupa na snagu danom donošenja i ista će godine donosi: se objaviti u "Službenom glasniku opštine Srebrenica". ODLUKU Obrazloženje o davanju kancelarijskog prostora 38m² - II sprat ranije robne kuće u "Srebreničanka" na korištenje Skupština opštine Srebrenica dodjeljuje predmetnu MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica prostoriju MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica na korištenje da bi se obezbjedio nesmetan i funkcionalan rad Član 1. Društva. Ovom odlukom daje se na korištenje poslovna DOSTAVLJENO: prostorija (38 m²) smještena na II spratu nekadašnje 1. Načelniku opštine; robne kuće Srebreničanka (Trg Mihajla Bjelakovića bb) 2. Stručnoj službi SO; Muslimanskom dobortvornom društvu "Merhamet" 3. MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica; Srebrenica. 4. a/a. Član 2. PREDSJEDNIK SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE Nedib Smajić, s.r. MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica će navedeni prostor koristiti bez nadoknade na vremenski period od 10 godina (sa mogućnostima raskida, odnosno produženja vremenskog trajanja ugovora). Predmetni prostor se nalazi u dosta zapuštenom stanju te MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica na sebe preuzima obavezu adaptacije istog.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Confidential RUF Apppeal Judgment
    SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE СУД БОСНЕ И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ THE COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Case No: S1 1 K 002995 10 Kri (X-KR-09/823-2) Date of pronouncement: 3 October 2012 Written copy sent on: 25 December 2012 Trial Panel: Minka Kreho, Presiding Judge Ljubomir Kitić, Judge Željka Marenić, Judge PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. Dragan Nešković and Zoran Ilić VERDICT Prosecutor of the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Erik Larson Defense Counsel for the Accused: Dragan Nešković: Vesna Tupajić Škiljević and Goran Nešković Zoran Ilić: Miloš Perić and Petko Pavlović 1 S1 1 K 002995 10 Kri 3 October 2012 I. IZREKA No: S1 1 K 002995 10 KrI (Ref. X-KR-09/823-2) Sarajevo, 3 October 2012 IN THE NAME OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Judge Minka Kreho as the Presiding Judge, and Judges Ljubomir Kitić and Željka Marenić as members of the Panel, with the participation of Legal Advisor Emil Pinkas, as the record-taker, in the criminal case of the Accused Dragan Nešković and Zoran Ilić, charged with the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in relation with sub-paragraphs a), d), e) and k), as read with Articles 29 and 180(1) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter: the CC of BiH), deciding upon the Indictment of the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina number T20 0 KTRZ 0000565 of 13 September 2010, which was amended on 22 June 2012, having held a main public hearing (partly closed to the public) in the presence of the Prosecutor
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Address: Press
    Press Release . Communiqué de presse (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations REGISTRY Nations Unies GREFFE The Hague, 11 April 2003 J.L./ P.I.S. / 745e ARREST AND TRANSFER OF NASER ORI] International Criminal Tribunal for the former On Thursday 10 April 2003, SFOR forces arrested Naser Ori} in Tuzla, Bosnia and Yugoslavia Herzegovina. The accused was transferred to the Detention Unit of the International Criminal Tribunal Pénal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia the following day. International pour l’ex-Yougoslavie The Indictment against Naser Ori} was confirmed on 28 March 2003. According to the Indictment, Naser Ori} (born on 3 March 1967 in Poto~ari, municipality of Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina) was the Commander of the forces of the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ABiH) in the Srebrenica area in Eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Indictment states that, “by virtue of his position and authority as Commander, Naser Ori} commanded all units that were operating within his area of his responsibility. This includes all units involved in combat activities in the municipality of Srebrenica and Bratunac, in particular the combat activities in Rupovo Brdo on 10 June 1992, Ratkovi}i on 21 and 27 June 1992, Je`estica on 8 August 1992, Fakovi}i on 5 October 1992, Bjelovac between 14 and 19 December 1992 and Kravica on 7 and 8 January 1993 and all units including the Military Police involved in the detention and custody of Serb individuals in Srebrenica ”. The Indictment alleges that, between 24 September 1992 and 20 March 1993, members of the Military Police under the command and control of Naser Ori} detained several Serb individuals in the Srebrenica Police Station and in the building behind the Srebrenica Municipal Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Arhivski Pogledi” 1 „Archival Views” 1
    „ARHIVSKI POGLEDI” 1 „ARCHIVAL VIEWS” 1 Izdavač: Publisher: Društvo arhivskih zaposlenika Association of Archival Employees in Tuzlanskog kantona Tuzla Canton Za izdavača: For Publisher: Selma Isić Selma Isić Redakcija: Editorial Board: Mr. Omer Zulić (predsjednik), dr. Silvija Mr. Omer Zulić (president), dr. Silvija Babić, dr. Miroslav Novak, dr. Sead Babić, dr. Miroslav Novak, dr. Sead Selimović, dr. Izet Šabotić, mr. Adnan Tinjić, Selimović, dr. Izet Šabotić, mr. Adnan Tinjić, mr. Jasmin Jajčević, Selma Isić, mr. Jasmin Jajčević, Selma Isić, Hatidža Fetahagić Hatidža Fetahagić Sekretar Redakcije: Secretary of the Editorial Board: Mr. Adnan Tinjić Mr. Adnan Tinjić Glavni i odgovorni urednik: Editor-in-Chief: Mr. sc. Omer Zulić Mr. sc. Omer Zulić Urednik: Editor: Prof. dr. Izet Šabotić Prof. dr. Izet Šabotić Lektor: Proofreading: Hatidža Fetahagić Hatidža Fetahagić Korektori: Copy editing: Selma Isić Selma Isić Mr. Jasmin Jajčević Mr. Jasmin Jajčević Prevod na engleski jezik: English translations: Mr. Adnan Tinjić Mr. Adnan Tinjić Prevod sa slovenačkog jezika: Slovenian translations: Maksida Hajdarević Maksida Hajdarević Dizajn korica: Cover design: Mr. Adnan Tinjić Mr. Adnan Tinjić Štampa: Printed by: "OFF-SET" Tuzla "OFF-SET" Tuzla Za štampariju: Printing office representative: Mirela Aljić Mirela Aljić Tiraž: Edition: 200 primjeraka 200 copies Svi rukopisi se šalju na e-mail adresu All manuscripts should be sent to glavnog i odgovornog urednika: the Editor-in-Chief e-mail address: [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]; [email protected] Stavovi autora izneseni u radovima Opinions of authors expressed in their objavljenim u ovom časopisu nisu istovremeno i papers published in the journal do not reflect stavovi Redakcije, nego su isključivo stavovi views or stances of the Editorial Board, they are autora.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Villages of the Srebrenica Region Reduced to Ashes
    Milivoje Ivanisevic SERBIAN VILLAGES OF THE SREBRENICA REGION REDUCED TO ASHES SERBIAN VILLAGES OF THE SREBRENICA REGION REDUCED TO ASHES Institute for Research on the Suffering of the Serbs in XX c. Belgrade, 2010. SERBIAN VILLAGES OF THE SREBRENICA REGION REDUCED TO ASHES This presentation of the crimes committed by the Muslims against the Serbian people of Central Podrinje is just a fraction of the entire pogrom of the Serbian population in that region throughout the war. The destruction of Serb settlements and their cultural and religious institutions in that region bear wounds, which have evidently not yet been healed. According to one of the several hundred important documents of the BiH Army in our possession, the following has been stated: “ At the end of January or beginning of February in 1993, within the Zone of Responsibility of the 8th OG (Operating Group, author’s remark), a vast, linked, free territory had been formed, with its centre in Srebrenica, covering 95% of the Srebrenica municipality, 90% of the Bratunac municipality, 60% of the Vlasenica municipality, and 50 % of the territory of the Zvornik municipality. Furthermore, a direct physical link with the liberated villages of the Zepa region was established.” 1 By that time (at the end of January or the beginning of February in 1993), according to the same document, in the above listed municipalities, the Muslims had occupied an area of more than 850 km2 of the entire territory. Their undisputed military success had nearly resulted in the complete extermination of the many Serb settlements in the aforementioned municipalities and had also produced much tribulation amongst the inhabitants of Serb nationality.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategije Razvoja Opštine Srebrenica Za Period 2018. – 2022.Godine
    Strategije razvoja opštine Srebrenica za period 2018. – 2022.godine 1. Mladen Grujičić 2. Dušica Kovačević 3. Mela Karić 4. Hasudin Mustafić 5. Bojan Pejić Srebrenica, 2017. godine I -UVOD Slika 1: Geografski položaj opštine Srebrenica Izvor: Odjeljenje za prostorno uređene i stambeno komunalne poslove, Opština Srebrenica 1.1. Geografski položaj i opšti podaci Opština se nalazi na sjeveroistoku Republike Srpske-BiH. Locirana je u središnjem dijelu toka rijeke Drine na koju se prislanja u dužini od 45 km, od čega je oko 23km Perućačko jezero, HE Bajina Bašta. Graniči sa opštinama Bratunac, Milići, Rogatica i Višegrad u BiH, i opštinom Bajina Bašta u Republici Srbiji. Prije rata u okviru regionalno-teritorijalnog uređenja u Republici Bosni i Hercegovini, Srebrenica je pripadala Tuzlanskom okrugu. Tabela 1. Opšti podaci Pokazatelji Opština Srebrenica Površina (km2) 531,96 Gustina naseljenosti (stanovnika/km2) 22 Broj stanovnika (2016.god.) 11698 Broj nezaposlenih (31.03.2017. god.) 1786 Broj zaposlenih (2016. god.) 2000 Prosječna neto plata u 2016.god. (KM) 834 Oranična površina (ha) 11.136 Izvor: Republički zavod za statistiku, Republika Srpska Prostorni plan Republike Srpske (usvojen) 2 1.2. Saobraćajna povezanost Opština se ne nalazi na glavnim regionalnim saobraćajnim koridorima. Pojedini djelovi opštine su bolje povezani sa Republikom Srbijom i sa drugim područjima Bosne i Hercegovine, nego sa urbanim centrom. Do opštine postoje samo putne komunikacije. Prema tome opština Srebrenica spada u saobraćajno slabo povezanu opštinu. Srebrenica je pored regionalnih putnih pravaca (Bratunac-Skelani, Bratunac-Srebrenica-Skelani i Zeleni Jadar-Milići) prije rata imala izrazito razvijenu putno-komunikacionu mrežu makadamskih lokalnih - opštinskih seoskih puteva, koji su se koristili za potrebe stanovništva, turizma, lovnog turizma i privrede.
    [Show full text]