DOCSLIB.ORG

OWENS VALLEY NATIVE FISH SANCTUARY B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OWENS VALLEY NATIVE FISH SANCTUARY B RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE OWENS PUPFISH, CYPRINODON RADIOSUS Published by U.S. Fish ana Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 9Z, 7fy Date THIS IS THE COMPLETED RECOVERY PLAN OF THE OWENs PUPFISH. IT HAs BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPREsENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE PLAN FORMULATION. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1984. RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE OWENS PUPFISH, CYPRINODON RADIOSUS. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, PORTLAND, OREGON. 47 pp. ADDITIONAL COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED FROM; FISH AND WILDLIFE REFERENCE SERVICE 1776 E. JEFFERSON STREET, FOURTH FLOOR ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20852 TELEPHONE; 1-800-582-3421 (IN MARYLAND; 1-301-468-1737) Acknowledgments The authors of this recovery plan are Thomas L. Taylor, California Department of Fish and Game (present address: California Department of Parks and Recreation, P.O. Box 2390, Sacramento, California 95811) and Jack E. Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2800 Cottage Way, Room E-1823, Sacramento, California 95825). We are greateful to the reviewers who provided technical assistance on earlier drafts of this plan. In particular, we wish to acknowledge Louis A. Courtois (California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento), Larry L. Eng (California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento), Gail C. Kobetich (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento), Robert R. Miller (The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), Peter B. Moyle (University of California, Davis), Edwin P. Pister (California Department of Fish and Guile, Bishop), Donald W. Sada (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno), and Darrell M. Wong (California Department of Fish and Game, Bishop). Were it not for the tireless efforts of Edwin P. Pister and other members of the Desert Fishes Council, the Owens pupfish and its habitats would have vanished long ago. Cover Photograph: Fish Slough with White Mountains in the background. Photograph taken 30 March 1981 by Thomas L. Taylor. Owens Pupfish Recovery Plan Executive Summary 1. Point or condition when species can be considered recovered. Species can be considered recovered when five populations, each with a minimum overwintering population of SUU, have been establisned in five separate areas. The populations must have been free of threats for a period of five consecutive years with no foreseeable threats in the near future. 2. What must be done to reach recovery? Present populations need to be secured. Three new retugia need to be established and their habitats secured. 3. What specifically must be done to meet needs of #2? Habitat and populations will be secure When. I) exotic species are controlled or eliminated, 2) emergent vegetation is controlled, and 3) sufficient water quality is guaranteed. For new refugia, habitats must be secured, management plans snould be developed and implemented, and puptish should be introduced. 4. What management/maintenance needs nave been identified to keep tne species recovered? Management plans will be developed and implemented. A monitoring program is proposed. Also, public education and law enforcement progrems (including periodic review of applicable laws and regulations) are included. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I. INTRODUCTION ........ 1 Taxonomy ........ 2 Description ........ 2 Ecology ........ 4 Historic Distribution and Decline . 6 Causes of Decline ........ 8 Current Status and Conservation Efforts ........ 9 PART II. RECOVERY ....... 16 Objectives ....... 16 Step-down Outline ....... 18 Narrative ....... 22 Literature Cited .......38 PART III. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ....... 41 APPENDIX ....... 47 List of Agencies Asked to Submit Review Comments. 47 OMENS PUPFISH RECOVERY PLAN PART I. INTRODUCTION The Oweris pupfish ( Cyprinodon radiosus) orginally ranged throughout much of the Owens Valley, California. They were once abundant in shallow marshy areas and springs along the Owens River from Fish Slough in Mono County to Owens Lake in Inyo County, but domestic and agricultral use of the springs and water diversions have eliminated most of the habitat of the Owens pupfish. The introduction of exotic predator and competitors has also contributed to the extirpation of populations. For 14 years the Owens pupfish was believed to be extinct, but in 1956 a small population was "discovered" in Fish Slough. The significance of this population was not realized until it was redi scovered in 1964. This small population has been the source for all Owens pupfish populations that subsequently have been reestablished and exist today (Miller and Pister 1971). The depl eted status of this species has been widely recognized in the governmental and scientific communities. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the Owens pupfish as endangered in 1967 (Federal Register 32:400i). The State of California also lists this species as endangered (California Department of Fish and Game 1980) as does the American Fisheries Society (Deacon et al. 1979). 2 Taxonomy The Owens pupfish was orginally referred to as C. macularius (Kennedy 1916). This taxonomic identification was questioned when sufficient information was collected to indicate that pupfish in the Amargosa and Owens River drainages should be considered taxonomically distinct from those in the Colorado River system (Miller 1943). In 1948, Miller published his findings describing the Owens pupfish, _C. radiosus, as a new species endemic to the Owens Valley. The type locality for the Owens pupfisn is the northwest spring of Fish Slough (Miller 1946), which is currently within the Owens Valley Native Fish Sanctuary. Relationships of C. radiosus, are considered to ue closer to the ancestral form of 4prinodon (cf. macuiarius), which entered the Owens and Deatn Valley areas during the Pliocene, than with C. nevadensis or C. salinus (Miller 1981). Description The Owens pupfish is a small, deep-bodied fish with a laterally compressed shape. Maximum total length for this species is 60 mm (2 3/8 in) but most are typically 30 to 45 mm (11/4 to 1 3/4 in). i4prinodon radiosus closely resembles _C. _macularius _ _ _ _ except that they lack the spine-like projections on the circuli of the scales and the interspaces among the circuli possess prominent reticulations (Miller 1948). The structural scale pattern of C. radiosus is similar to that of C._ nevadensis and _C. _diabolis _ _ _ of the Amargosa River drainage as 3 well as C. salinus and C._ milleri of Death Valley. Cyprinodon radiosus differs from the pupfishes in the Amargosa and Death Valley regions by possessing a very anteriorly positioned dorsal fin (predorsal length averages 53.3% of SL 1 in males and 54.8% in females) a thickened first dorsal fin ray, a higher average number of dorsal (i = 11.1), anal (i =10.4), and pelvic (i = 6.9) fin rays; a much more slender head (averages 21.9% of SL), and a larger caudal peduncle (averages 28.6% of SL in males and 26.2% in females) (Miller 1948). The species is illustrated in Miller (1948:Plate IX), Moyle (1976.257) and Soltz and Naiman (1978:12-13). Owens pupfish, like other species of Cyprinodon, are sexually dichromatic. Adult males possess a blue color overlying an olive color dorsally and slate ventrally (Miller 1948). Lateral bars are deep purplish with some gold color among the posterior bars. Lower parts of the head are silver and blue. The dorsal and anal fins are blue with an orange-amber border. The caudal fin may or may not possess a terminal black band. Miller (1948) characterizes the color of females as deep olive with brown lateral blotches and vertical bars shade toward purplish. The fins are yellowish with pale margins on the dorsal and anal. An ocellus is present on the posterior portion of the dorsal fin in females. Breeding colors of the Owens pupfish are described in detail by Miller and Pister (1971). 1 Standard length (SL) is the distance from the tip of the snout to the end of the vertebral column. 4 Except for color differences, tne Owens puptisn exnibits little sexual dimorphism. However, Miller (1948) noted that males possessed a deeper body, head, and caudal peduncle than females. The caudal peduncle is longer in males and the fins, particularly the anal, are larger. Sexes exhibit little variation in other mensural characters. Ecology Male pupfish are larger than females and are territorial. The spawning season extends from April to October depending on weather conditions. Once the water temperature exceeds 2O°C, spawning begins. Males become territorial and bright blue in color when spawning. Males defend their territory from otner male pupfish as well as all other fish species. Females that enter a male's territory are courted. Eacn female can spawn a total of bi.) to 200 eggs per season, but rarely lays more than one or two eggs at a time (Barlow i961). The eggs are transparent, demersal, and approximately 2 mm in diameter. They hatch in about 7 to 10 days, depending on water temperature. In captivity, pupfish larvae are large enough to feed from the day of hatching on small food items the size of brine shrimp nauplii (Great- and Haycock 1971). In the wild, pupfish fry live along the shorelines where the warm water supports abundant quantities of food. The fish mature in 3 to 4 months, permitting one spawning prior to their first overwintering period. Runoff from winter and spring rains creates extensive shallow areas wnich provide excellent spawning and nursery habitat for the pupfish. 5 During spring, the size of the pupfish population increases dramatically as this habitat enlarges and warms (Brown 1971).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Ana Sucker Habitat, Santa Ana River
    Santa Ana succker (Catostomus santaanae) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Santa Ana sucker habitat, Santa Ana River. Photo credit Christine Medak (USFWS). U.S. Fish and Wildliffee Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, CA March 10, 2011 2011 5-Year Review for Santa Ana sucker 5-YEAR REVIEW Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed. Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Desert Pupfish Abundance to Selected Environmental Variables
    Environmental Biology of Fishes (2005) 73: 97–107 Ó Springer 2005 Relation of desert pupfish abundance to selected environmental variables in natural and manmade habitats in the Salton Sea basin Barbara A. Martin & Michael K. Saiki U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Western Fisheries Research Center-Dixon Duty Station, 6924 Tremont Road, Dixon, CA 95620, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 6 April 2004 Accepted 12 October 2004 Key words: species assemblages, predation, water quality, habitat requirements, ecological interactions, endangered species Synopsis We assessed the relation between abundance of desert pupfish, Cyprinodon macularius, and selected biological and physicochemical variables in natural and manmade habitats within the Salton Sea Basin. Field sampling in a natural tributary, Salt Creek, and three agricultural drains captured eight species including pupfish (1.1% of the total catch), the only native species encountered. According to Bray– Curtis resemblance functions, fish species assemblages differed mostly between Salt Creek and the drains (i.e., the three drains had relatively similar species assemblages). Pupfish numbers and environmental variables varied among sites and sample periods. Canonical correlation showed that pupfish abundance was positively correlated with abundance of western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis, and negatively correlated with abundance of porthole livebearers, Poeciliopsis gracilis, tilapias (Sarotherodon mossambica and Tilapia zillii), longjaw mudsuckers, Gillichthys mirabilis, and mollies (Poecilia latipinna and Poecilia mexicana). In addition, pupfish abundance was positively correlated with cover, pH, and salinity, and negatively correlated with sediment factor (a measure of sediment grain size) and dissolved oxygen. Pupfish abundance was generally highest in habitats where water quality extremes (especially high pH and salinity, and low dissolved oxygen) seemingly limited the occurrence of nonnative fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Introduced Tilapias on Native Biodiversity
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15: 463–483 (2005) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.699 The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity GABRIELLE C. CANONICOa,*, ANGELA ARTHINGTONb, JEFFREY K. MCCRARYc,d and MICHELE L. THIEMEe a Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA b Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Australia c University of Central America, Managua, Nicaragua d Conservation Management Institute, College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA e Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA ABSTRACT 1. The common name ‘tilapia’ refers to a group of tropical freshwater fish in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as baitfish for certain capture fisheries, for aquaria, and as a food fish. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. 2. Tilapias are well-suited to aquaculture because they are highly prolific and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the ‘aquatic chicken’ because of their potential as an affordable, high-yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments } from subsistence or ‘backyard’ units to intensive fish hatcheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Species Mapping for the Green Visions Plan
    Target Species Habitat Mapping California Quail and Mountain Quail (Callipepla californica and Oreortyx pictus) Family: Phasianidae Order: Galliformes Class: Aves WHR #: B140 and B141 Distribution: California quail are found in southern Oregon, northern Nevada, California, and Baja California, and have been introduced in other states such as Hawaii, Washington, Idaho, Colorado, and Utah (Peterson 1961). In California, they are widespread but absent from the higher elevations of the Sierra Nevada, the Cascades, the White Mountains, and the Warner Mountains, and are replaced by the related Gambel’s quail (C. gambelii) in some desert regions (Peterson 1961, Small 1994). In southern California, they are found from the Coast Range south to the Mexican border, and occur as far east as the western fringes of the Mojave and Sonoran deserts, such as in the Antelope Valley (Garrett and Dunn 1981, Small 1994). California quail range from sea level to about 5000 ft (1524 meters; Stephenson and Calcarone 1999) Mountain quail are resident from northern Washington and northern Idaho, south through parts of Oregon, northwestern Nevada, California, and northern Baja California (Peterson 1961). In southern California, mountain quail are found in nearly all of the mountain ranges west of the deserts, including the southern Coast Ranges, from the Santa Lucia Mountains south through Santa Barbara and Ventura counties, and the Peninsular Ranges south to the Mexican border (Garrot and Dunn 1981, Small 1994). In the Transverse Ranges, a small population occurs in the western Santa Monica Mountains, and larger populations occur in the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains (Small 1994). Mountain quail are found at elevations from below 2000 ft (610 meters) to over 9000 ft (2743 meters; Stephenson and Calcarone 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Zooarchaeology As If It Mattered: Use of Faunal Data To
    In, Zooarchaeoloqy and Conseryation Biology 2004, R. Lee Lyman and Kenneth P. Cannon,-eds. pp. 25-44, The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 2 Doing Zooarchaeologyas if It Mattered: Use of Faunal Data to AddressCurrent Issuesin Fish ConservationBiology in OwensValley, California VIRGINIA L. BUTLERAND MICHAEL G. DELACORTE "V cologists are increasingly incorporating conceptssuch as "legacy" into l::Jtheir explanations of current ecosystems(Harding et al. 1:998). This approach acknowledges that understanding the structure and function of extant ecosystems(or predicting future responsesto climate change)re- quires knowledge of historical forces that have beenoperating for decades, centuries, or longer (Foster 2.000;Moorhead et al. 1:999).Indeed, recog- nition of the needfor such long-term historical records is demonstratedby the level of National ScienceFoundation funding for the Long-Term Eco- logical Research(LTER) network (Kaiser 2.oo1:b;LTER Network 2.001:). Over 1:,1:00researcqers funded by the LTER carry out researchon 2..4des- ignated sites that have been studied;from a few years to several decades (Kaiser 2.O01:b).These studies cover a range of topics with the overall goal of "investigating ecological processesover long temporal and broad spa- tial scales" (LTER Network 2.001:).This goal is precisely that of zoo- archaeology.Yet, to our knowledge, zooarchaeologicalexpertise and data have not been incorporated into the LTER network. Our point is simply I that ecological sciencesseeking to understand the long-term properties of ecosystemshave direct accessto such information through zooarchaeology. Zooarchaeology needsto tollaborate with wildlife sciencesbecause of the increasing speedwith which habitats and biotas are being lost in the face of human population growth and habitat destruction (Minckley and Deacon 1:991:;Vitousek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare and Contrast the Water Environment Between Death Valley Pupfish Specie and Devil’S Hole Pupfish Specie
    Compare and Contrast the Water environment between Death Valley Pupfish Specie and Devil’s Hole Pupfish Specie By Roy Tianran Gao 1 Table of Contents Title page 1 Abstract 3 Introduction and Background 3 Water Temperature 4 Salinity 6 Water Level 7 Conservation 10 Conclusion 11 References 12 2 ABSTRACT The two types of pupfish (Cyprinodon) in Death Valley National Park are Death Valley pupfish and Devil’s Hole pupfish. Death Valley pupfish has been existed over 10,000 years and Devil’s Hole pupfish has been existed for over 20,000 years. Both of the pupfishes are endangered species. The average number of Death Valley pupfish has decreased by about 100 since 1990s, and the number of Devil’s Hole pupfish has decreased by 400 since 1995. Comparing the water level, water temperature and the water salinity between the two species of pupfish would help to define the living requirements and reason of decreasing population. The research toward the result is based on 7 journal articles, 4 websites, and 1 book. As the result shows, Death Valley Pupfish and Devil’s Hole Pupfish live in different water environments and functioned differently. Understanding the water environment of the two types of pupfishes will help people building new habitats for pupfishes and increase their population so that would be possible to avoid the extinction of pupfishes from the earth. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Pupfish is a small killifish in the Southwest of America. There are five pupfish species in Death Valley which are Armargosa pupfish, Saratoga Pupfish, Devil’s Hole pupfish, Death Valley pupfish, and Cotton ball Marsh pupfish (National Park Service, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon Tularosa)
    The Endangered White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa) genome reveals low diversity and heterogenous patterns of differentiation Andrew Black1, Janna Willoughby2, Anna Br¨uniche-Olsen3, Brian Pierce4, and Andrew DeWoody1 1Purdue University 2Auburn University 3University of Copenhagen 4Texas A and M University College Station November 24, 2020 Abstract The White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa), endemic to New Mexico in Southwestern North America, is of conservation concern due in part to invasive species, chemical pollution, and groundwater withdrawal. Herein, we developed a high quality draft reference genome and use it to provide biological insights into the evolution and conservation of C. tularosa. Specifically, we localized microsatellite markers previously used to demarcate Evolutionary Significant Units, evaluated the possibility of introgression into the C. tularosa genome, and compared genomic diversity among related species. The de novo assembly of PacBio Sequel II error-corrected reads resulted in a 1.08Gb draft genome with a contig N50 of 1.4Mb and 25,260 annotated protein coding genes, including 95% of the expected Actinopterigii conserved orthologs. Many of the previously described C. tularosa microsatellite markers fell within or near genes and exhibited a pattern of increased heterozygosity near genic areas compared to those in intergenic regions. Genetic distances between C. tularosa and the widespread invasive species C. variegatus, which diverged ~1.6-4.7 MYA, were 0.027 (nuclear) and 0.022 (mitochondrial). Nuclear alignments revealed putative tracts of introgression that merit further investigation. Genome-wide heterozygosity was markedly lower in C. tularosa compared to estimates from related species, likely because of smaller long-term effective population sizes constrained by their isolated and limited habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 06 Fisheries & Aquatic Resources.Pdf
    CHAPTER 6 Fisheries and Aquatic Resources CHAPTER 6 FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCES This chapter describes the existing fisheries and aquatic resources conditions, the applicable regulations, and potential impacts from implementation of the Proposed Project Alternative and other alternatives on the fisheries and aquatic resources in the Project Area. 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section describes the environmental setting related to fisheries and aquatic resources that may be influenced by implementation of the Proposed Project Alternative or other alternatives in the Project Area including Lake Mary, Mammoth Creek extending from Lake Mary to its confluence with Hot Creek, and Hot Creek from its confluence with Mammoth Creek downstream to the USGS Hot Creek Flume Gage. 6.1.1 LAKE MARY Lake Mary is a cirque lake (a deep, steep-walled basin on a mountain) formed by the filling of remnant moraine depressions left by receding glaciers (USGS 1999). Lake Mary contains prominent granite features, and cold, clear water, making it a popular angling destination. A "fishing enhancement" program is implemented by both the Town of Mammoth Lakes and CDFG to maintain the lake’s appeal as a “trophy” trout destination. The recreational fishery in Lake Mary is maintained by both the Town of Mammoth Lakes and CDFG because of its economic importance to the Mammoth Lakes Basin (Mammoth City Concierge 2010). Lake Mary has been, and continues to be managed as a put-and-take recreational fishery. Hatchery rainbow trout have been regularly planted by CDFG beginning in the late spring and extending through the summer. The lake also is often planted with “Alpers trout.” The Alpers trout is a genetic hybrid of rainbow trout, Kamloops trout and steelhead, raised in the streams and ponds of Alpers Owens River Ranch.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Safe Harbor Agreement
    SAFE HARBOR AGREEMENT WITH THE BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE FOR OWENS PUPFISH (Cyprinodon radiosus), INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by Bishop Paiute Tribe, Environmental Management Office and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SPECIES COVERED BY THIS AGREEMENT ................................................................ 3 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ENROLLED PROPERTY .................................................................. 5 4.0 BASELINE DETERMINATION ........................................................................................ 8 5.0 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................ 11 6.0 INCIDENTAL TAKE OF COVERED SPECIES ............................................................. 15 7.0 NET CONSERVATION BENEFIT .................................................................................. 20 8.0 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES ........................................................................ 21 9.0 AGREEMENT AND PERMIT DURATION .................................................................... 23 10.0 ASSURANCES TO THE TRIBE REGARDING TAKE OF COVERED SPECIES ....... 23 11.0 MODIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................ 23 12.0 OTHER MEASURES .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Owens Pupfish (Cyprinodon Radiosus) 5-Year Review
    Owens Pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Billy Perry, CSUMB U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California January 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Owens Pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Synthesis Document Fish and Fisheries of the Salton Sea
    1 Final Synthesis Document Fish and Fisheries of the Salton Sea Dr. Barry Costa-Pierce Institute of Marine Science University of Southern Mississippi Ocean Springs, MS 39564 Tel: 228-875-9368 Fax: 228-875-0528 [email protected] http://www.masgc.org/director/costapierce.html Background There are three distinct phases of development of the fish community of the Salton Sea : 1 . the ancient and modem freshwater phase; 2. the marine introduction and establishment phase ; 3. the hypersaline tilapia phase . The Freshwater and Marine Phases Lake Cahuilla filled the Salton basin to the Coachella Valley at various times until the latter part of the 16th century (Weide 1976) . Archaeological excavations of the ancient lake basin have found the following species of freshwater fish : Elops affinis (machete) Gila robusta (bonytail), Mugil cephalus (striped mullet), Ptchocheilus lucius, and Xyrauchen texanus (humpback sucker) (Yohe 1990) . Desert Cahuilla Indians developed highly sophisticated stone traps to catch migrating fish in the ancient lake (Costa-Pierce 1985), the remains of which can be seen today along State Road 86 in Salton City, just north of the Tarantula Ridge . After the modem Sea was formed in 1905-06, Evermann (1916) reported sizeable populations of the following fishes in order of their abundance . 2 Fish reported in the Salton Sea in 1916 Fish Species Reported Abundance Cyprinus carpio "the most abundant species" Common carp Mugil cephalus "second most common" Striped mullet Xyrauchen texanus "common" but several with a starved appearance Humpback sucker Salmo gairdneri (now "common", some in "bleached but Oncorhynchus mykiss) excellent condition" Rainbow trout Gila robusta "common, but not observed" Bonytail Cyprinodon macularius "found at Figtree John Spring" Desert pupfish Source: Walker et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Restoration As a Means of Controlling Non-Native Fish in a Mojave Desert Oasis G
    Habitat Restoration as a Means of Controlling Non-Native Fish in a Mojave Desert Oasis G. Gary Scoppettone,1,2 Peter H. Rissler,1 Chad Gourley,3 and Cynthia Martinez4 Abstract depth (TD) than non-native Sailfin molly (Poecilia lati- Non-native fish generally cause native fish decline, and pinna) and Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) in warm once non-natives are established, control or elimination is water stream habitat, and Ash Meadows speckled dace in- usually problematic. Because non-native fish colonization habited significantly faster water than non-natives in cool has been greatest in anthropogenically altered habitats, water stream habitat. Modification of the outflow of Kings restoring habitat similar to predisturbance conditions may Pool Spring from marsh to warm water stream, with offer a viable means of non-native fish control. In this MWCV, TD, and temperature favoring native fish, investigation we identified habitats favoring native over changed the fish composition from predominantly non- non-native fish in a Mojave Desert oasis (Ash Meadows) native Sailfin molly and Mosquitofish to predominantly and used this information to restore one of its major warm Ash Meadows pupfish. This result supports the hypoth- water spring systems (Kings Pool Spring). Prior to restora- esis that restoring spring systems to a semblance of pre- tion, native fishes predominated in warm water (25–32°C) disturbance conditions would promote recolonization stream and spring-pool habitat, whereas non-natives pre- of native fishes and deter non-native fish invasion and dominated in cool water (•23°C) spring-pool and marsh/ proliferation. slack water habitat. Native Amargosa pupfish (Cyprino- don nevadensis) and Ash Meadows speckled dace (Rhi- Key words: Ash Meadows, Cyprinodon nevadensis, habi- nichthys osculus nevadensis) inhabited significantly faster tat manipulation, Mojave Desert, non-native fish control, mean water column velocities (MWCV) and greater total Rhinichthys osculus nevadensis, thermo springs.
    [Show full text]