DOCSLIB.ORG

National Crime Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 National Crime Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Crime Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 National Crime Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 National Crime Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 National Crime Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 2 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 July 2017. HC 204 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at NCA, Command Suite, Unit 1, Citadel Place, Tinworth Street, London SE11 5EF Print ISBN 9781474146210 Web ISBN 9781474146227 ID 05051709 07/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents Foreword by the Home Secretary 3 Part One – Performance Report 4 Statement by the Director General 4 Performance Report – 2016-2017 5 Introduction 6 Statement of purpose 6 Going concern statement 7 Overview 8 Vulnerability 8 Commodity 9 Prosperity 10 Performance Analysis 14 1. Understanding the threats 14 2. The Effectiveness of our response 15 3. Working with partners 17 4. Managing resources 21 Scotland 24 Northern Ireland 25 NCA output data for 2016-17 26 Sustainability Report 27 Part Two – Accountability Report 33 Corporate Governance Report 33 Directors’ report 33 Statement of the Accounting Officer’s responsibilities 34 The Governance Statement 35 Remuneration and Staff Report 50 Parliamentary accountability and audit report 62 Statement of Parliamentary Supply 62 Notes to the Statement of Parliamentary Supply 63 Remote contingent liabilities, losses and special payments 65 The Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament 66 Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 1 Part Three – Financial statements 68 Statement of comprehensive net expenditure 68 Statement of financial position 69 Statement of cash flow 70 Statement of changes to taxpayers’ equity 71 Notes to the accounts 72–89 Annex A – Core Tables 90 2 Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 Foreword by the Home Secretary In my time as Home Secretary, I have been pleased to see an increased collaboration between the NCA and its policing partners, in particular the agency’s collaboration with counter-terrorism (CT) policing. The operational successes in this area have considerably enhanced the intelligence picture of the firearms threat and helped to keep the public safe. Operation Dragonroot alone, a month-long joint NCA and CT Policing operation, resulted in the seizure of 642 substantiated firearms and the arrest of 282 suspects. Since the National Crime Agency (NCA) was created in 2013, the variety, scale and Organised criminal groups are quick to impact of the serious and organised crime modernise and the NCA must keep pace. threat has evolved. We have seen a rise in The agency must respond to the impact of reports of child sexual exploitation and new technology – for example, encrypted abuse; a number of cyber-attacks that defy communications, the dark web market place, borders and jurisdictions; and situations in and drones – whilst delivering operational the Mediterranean and Calais where results. It is vital that government and organised criminal groups have exploited policing, led by the NCA, collectively raise vulnerable humans. our game and continue to develop a shared understanding of the threats we face, build Now more than ever, it is essential that the shared capabilities, and act in concert NCA is a powerful crime fighting body with against criminals. This is the only way we the right capabilities, powers, structure and will succeed in making the UK a truly international reach to respond to this hostile environment for serious and dynamic threat. organised crime. The NCA has made significant strategic advancements in the last year. The agency’s collaboration with the new National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), and cyber specialist officers across UK policing, has helped to prevent several cyber incidents. The Joint The Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP Financial Analysis Centre (JFAC), that was Home Secretary set up in response to the Panama Papers data leak, has established itself as a key part of the UK’s anti-money laundering system. Last year also marked the International Corruption Unit’s (ICU) first full year of operation, during which it conducted significant investigations and restrained around £170m. International cooperation is vital in securing a response to the threat of bribery and corruption. Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 3 Part One – Performance Report Statement by the Director General In this financial year we have organised the threats into three broad areas: Prosperity – including cyber and financial crime; Vulnerability – including child sexual exploitation and abuse, modern slavery and human trafficking and organised immigration crime; and Commodity – including firearms and drugs. There is no greater mission for a law This approach allows us to improve our enforcement officer than to protect the public understanding of the intelligence linkages and it is with great pride that I publish the and focus our response. The report details National Crime Agency’s annual report for our progress in understanding the 2016-17. intelligence picture, ensuring relentless investigation and in building new The dedication and commitment of our capabilities to protect the public and bring officers, and the many partners we work offenders to justice. alongside, is reflected in our operational achievements, some of which are set out in Our transformation of the organisation, this report. The public in the UK and abroad alongside partners, must continue and I have are safer as a result of our efforts. been delighted to welcome new members to our Board to assist in this focus. We have We are not complacent, however; the nature also established an Independent Reference of serious and organised crime evolves, as Group, comprising members of the public do the tactics deployed by criminals and we who provide advice to the Board, assisting us must keep pace. With the developments in in our consideration of public consent for the technology, serious and organised crime is exercise of our powers and responsibilities. increasingly global with victims and offenders often not connected by proximity. Organised We lead the fight to cut serious and crime has the ability to reach into and impact organised crime with determination and all communities, often affecting the most focus and I commend the work of the vulnerable in our society. This requires the National Crime Agency to you. continuing evolution of the British policing model. Lynne Owens CBE QPM MA Director General Date: 7 July 2017 4 Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 Performance Report Report – 2016-2017 – 2016-2017 95% 1738 conviction rate disruptions against groups, on NCA cases in UK courts individuals, threats or vulnerabilities £28.3m 1441 1176 assets arrests arrests recovered in the UK overseas £82.8m assets denied as a result of NCA activity to criminals via restraint, assets frozen and cash seized 89.5 tonnes of Class A drugs seized a further 58 tonnes of Class B 599 1896 firearms children seized safeguarded or protected 528 as a result of of these were guns NCA activity 2906430 NCA Infographic_3rd.indd 1 Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 07/07/20175 12:45 Introduction The National Crime Agency (NCA) is tackling those threats that require a global responsible for protecting the UK’s response, such as cyber crime, the security communities from the effects of serious and of borders, international corruption and use organised crime. of the dark web. This is our fourth annual report, and it sets out how we have worked to keep the public Statement of purpose safe over the past year. The Director General has operational Our highest priority, as set out by the independence, and is accountable to the Government’s Serious and Organised Crime Home Secretary and through the Home Strategy, is to identify and disrupt serious Secretary to Parliament. The agency is also and organised crime by investigating and subject to scrutiny by the Scottish Parliament securing the prosecution of those and the Northern Ireland Assembly. responsible. The NCA is a non-ministerial department, We tackle the criminal groups who exploit funded directly by Parliament via the supply the vulnerable through modern slavery and estimate. We also receive funding for human trafficking, organised immigration ring-fenced projects from other government crime, or by making and distributing departments, and contributions from the indecent images of children. Scottish Government and the Police Service of Northern Ireland. Our work to disrupt and seize money from organised criminals impacts on their ability The Home Secretary sets the NCA’s strategic to continue to undertake their illegal activity. priorities. Within that framework, the Director General sets the NCA’s operational By ensuring that the most serious and priorities. These two sets of priorities inform dangerous offenders serve custodial the ways in which we lead, support and sentences and seizing illicit commodities coordinate operational activity under the such as firearms, we help to remove those National Control Strategy aligned to the threats to society. Government’s Serious and Organised Crime Strategy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STRATEGIC PLAN Funding in the US (Circa 1980) MANAGING RISK to ENSURE INTELLIGENCE ADVANTAGE
    Intelligence Reform And Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 FY2016-2020 IC S&T Executive Order 12333 (1981) Industrial R&D Funding Begins Exceeding Government R&D STRATEGIC PLAN Funding in the US (Circa 1980) MANAGING RISK TO ENSURE INTELLIGENCE ADVANTAGE National Security Act of 1947 Office of Strategic Services Disbanded (1945) 1 About the Cover: The cover uses a red and blue double helix to represent multiple concepts relating to the Intelligence Community’s (IC’s) science and technology (S&T) efforts. For example, starting at the bottom and moving up the image on the cover one observes—in chronological order—a number of key “red” challenges and “blue” technological achievements in the history of the IC. The use of this construct was not chosen randomly, however. Akin to how the base pairs in strands of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) correspond to one another, researchers and technologists within the IC S&T enterprise aspire to create capabilities that link to the threat environment of today—and in the future. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, the choice of a DNA strand is meant to convey the critical importance of basic research to the IC’s mission. Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................ iii Vision, Mission, and Guiding Principles for Intelligence Community Science and Technology Enterprise Investments ........................................................................... v Chapter 1 — Introduction ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Work of the National Crime Agency
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The work of the National Crime Agency Oral and written evidence 15 October 2013 Keith Bristow QPM, Head, National Crime Agency Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 and 23 October 2013 HC 659-i Published on 6 December 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £6.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Ian Austin MP (Labour, Dudley North) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament. Rt Hon Alun Michael (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Karl Turner MP (Labour, Kingston upon Hull East) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • A Counterintelligence Reader, Volume 2 Chapter 1, CI in World
    CI in World War II 113 CHAPTER 1 Counterintelligence In World War II Introduction President Franklin Roosevelts confidential directive, issued on 26 June 1939, established lines of responsibility for domestic counterintelligence, but failed to clearly define areas of accountability for overseas counterintelligence operations" The pressing need for a decision in this field grew more evident in the early months of 1940" This resulted in consultations between the President, FBI Director J" Edgar Hoover, Director of Army Intelligence Sherman Miles, Director of Naval Intelligence Rear Admiral W"S" Anderson, and Assistant Secretary of State Adolf A" Berle" Following these discussions, Berle issued a report, which expressed the Presidents wish that the FBI assume the responsibility for foreign intelligence matters in the Western Hemisphere, with the existing military and naval intelligence branches covering the rest of the world as the necessity arose" With this decision of authority, the three agencies worked out the details of an agreement, which, roughly, charged the Navy with the responsibility for intelligence coverage in the Pacific" The Army was entrusted with the coverage in Europe, Africa, and the Canal Zone" The FBI was given the responsibility for the Western Hemisphere, including Canada and Central and South America, except Panama" The meetings in this formative period led to a proposal for the organization within the FBI of a Special Intelligence Service (SIS) for overseas operations" Agreement was reached that the SIS would act
    [Show full text]
  • The First Americans the 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park
    United States Cryptologic History The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park Special series | Volume 12 | 2016 Center for Cryptologic History David J. Sherman is Associate Director for Policy and Records at the National Security Agency. A graduate of Duke University, he holds a doctorate in Slavic Studies from Cornell University, where he taught for three years. He also is a graduate of the CAPSTONE General/Flag Officer Course at the National Defense University, the Intelligence Community Senior Leadership Program, and the Alexander S. Pushkin Institute of the Russian Language in Moscow. He has served as Associate Dean for Academic Programs at the National War College and while there taught courses on strategy, inter- national relations, and intelligence. Among his other government assignments include ones as NSA’s representative to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council, and on the staff of the National Economic Council. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: (Top) Navy Department building, with Washington Monument in center distance, 1918 or 1919; (bottom) Bletchley Park mansion, headquarters of UK codebreaking, 1939 UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park David Sherman National Security Agency Center for Cryptologic History 2016 Second Printing Contents Foreword ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 British Signals Intelligence and the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland ABSTRACT Historians for Decades Have Placed Room 40, the Fi
    British Signals Intelligence and the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland ABSTRACT Historians for decades have placed Room 40, the First World War British naval signals intelligence organization, at the centre of narratives about the British anticipation of and response to the Easter Rising in Ireland in 1916. A series of crucial decrypts of telegrams between the German embassy in Washington and Berlin, it has been believed, provided significant advance intelligence about the Rising before it took place. This article upends previous accounts by demonstrating that Room 40 possessed far less advance knowledge about the Rising than has been believed, with most of the supposedly key decrypts not being generated until months after the Rising had taken place. INTRODUCTION A key moment in twentieth century Irish history, on Easter Monday 1916 a group of rebels launched in Dublin an uprising against British rule. Carefully prepared in advance, the Irish rebels had previously sought German assistance in providing arms and in organizing transport for famed Irish nationalist Roger Casement. The Germans agreed to provide this assistance, dispatching Casement aboard a German submarine and organizing a covert landing of munitions aboard a merchant ship masquerading as the Norwegian steamer Aud. The arms, however, were intercepted and Casement captured by the British authorities. Notwithstanding these reverses, the uprising went forward shortly thereafter on Easter Monday, 24 April 1916. Though apparently catching the British authorities in Ireland by surprise, the uprising was put down by the British in a violent crackdown. For decades, signals intelligence has been treated as the linchpin in our understanding of the British anticipation of and response to these events.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Constables' Council Minutes
    Chief Constables’ Council Minutes Wednesday 13 – Thursday 14 October 2016 CEOP HQ, Vauxhall, London Security classification: Official Disclosable under FOIA 2000: Author: Shelley Perera Force/organisation: National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) Date created: 19 October 2016 Attendees CC Sara Thornton NPCC Chair CC Andy Marsh Avon and Somerset CC Mark Collins Bedfordshire/Dyfed Powys CC Alec Wood Cambridgeshire CC Simon Byrne Cheshire Commissioner Ian Dyson City of London CC Iain Spittal Cleveland CC Mick Creedon Derbyshire DCC Peter Goodman Derbyshire CC Debbie Simpson Dorset CC Michael Barton Durham CC Stephen Kavanagh Essex DCC Rod Hanson Gloucestershire CC Ian Hopkins Greater Manchester CC Jeff Farrar Gwent CC Olivia Pinkney Hampshire A/ACC Amanda Pearson Hampshire CC Charlie Hall Hertfordshire CC Alan Pughsley Kent CC Steve Finnigan Lancashire CC Simon Cole Leicestershire CC Andy Cooke Merseyside ACC Andy Ward Merseyside AC Mark Rowley Metropolitan Police Service AC Helen King Metropolitan Police Service AC Martin Hewitt Metropolitan Police Service DAC Helen Ball Metropolitan Police Service CC Simon Bailey Norfolk CC Simon Edens Northamptonshire CC Steve Ashman Northumbria CC Dave Jones North Yorkshire CC Sue Fish Nottinghamshire DCC Simon Torr Nottinghamshire 2 OFFICIAL Minutes of Chief Constables’ Council, 12-13 October 2016 CC Phil Gormley Police Scotland CC George Hamilton PSNI CC Peter Vaughan South Wales CC Stephen Watson South Yorkshire CC Jane Sawyers Staffordshire CC Mike Bowron States of Jersey Police CC Steve Jupp Suffolk
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Army Intelligence
    A Short History of Army Intelligence by Michael E. Bigelow, Command Historian, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Introduction On July 1, 2012, the Military Intelligence (MI) Branch turned fi fty years old. When it was established in 1962, it was the Army’s fi rst new branch since the Transportation Corps had been formed twenty years earlier. Today, it remains one of the youngest of the Army’s fi fteen basic branches (only Aviation and Special Forces are newer). Yet, while the MI Branch is a relatively recent addition, intelligence operations and functions in the Army stretch back to the Revolutionary War. This article will trace the development of Army Intelligence since the 18th century. This evolution was marked by a slow, but steady progress in establishing itself as a permanent and essential component of the Army and its operations. Army Intelligence in the Revolutionary War In July 1775, GEN George Washington assumed command of the newly established Continental Army near Boston, Massachusetts. Over the next eight years, he dem- onstrated a keen understanding of the importance of MI. Facing British forces that usually outmatched and often outnumbered his own, Washington needed good intelligence to exploit any weaknesses of his adversary while masking those of his own army. With intelligence so imperative to his army’s success, Washington acted as his own chief of intelligence and personally scrutinized the information that came into his headquarters. To gather information about the enemy, the American com- mander depended on the traditional intelligence sources avail- able in the 18th century: scouts and spies.
    [Show full text]
  • National Intelligence Council's Global Trends 2040
    A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL MARCH 2021 2040 GLOBAL TRENDS A MORE CONTESTED WORLD A MORE CONTESTED WORLD a Image / Bigstock “Intelligence does not claim infallibility for its prophecies. Intelligence merely holds that the answer which it gives is the most deeply and objectively based and carefully considered estimate.” Sherman Kent Founder of the Office of National Estimates Image / Bigstock Bastien Herve / Unsplash ii GLOBAL TRENDS 2040 Pierre-Chatel-Innocenti / Unsplash 2040 GLOBAL TRENDS A MORE CONTESTED WORLD MARCH 2021 NIC 2021-02339 ISBN 978-1-929667-33-8 To view digital version: www.dni.gov/nic/globaltrends A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL Pierre-Chatel-Innocenti / Unsplash TABLE OF CONTENTS v FOREWORD 1 INTRODUCTION 1 | KEY THEMES 6 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 | THE COVID-19 FACTOR: EXPANDING UNCERTAINTY 14 STRUCTURAL FORCES 16 | DEMOGRAPHICS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 23 | Future Global Health Challenges 30 | ENVIRONMENT 42 | ECONOMICS 54 | TECHNOLOGY 66 EMERGING DYNAMICS 68 | SOCIETAL: DISILLUSIONED, INFORMED, AND DIVIDED 78 | STATE: TENSIONS, TURBULENCE, AND TRANSFORMATION 90 | INTERNATIONAL: MORE CONTESTED, UNCERTAIN, AND CONFLICT PRONE 107 | The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts 108 SCENARIOS FOR 2040 CHARTING THE FUTURE AMID UNCERTAINTY 110 | RENAISSANCE OF DEMOCRACIES 112 | A WORLD ADRIFT 114 | COMPETITIVE COEXISTENCE 116 | SEPARATE SILOS 118 | TRAGEDY AND MOBILIZATION 120 REGIONAL FORECASTS 141 TABLE OF GRAPHICS 142 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv GLOBAL TRENDS 2040 FOREWORD elcome to the 7th edition of the National Intelligence Council’s Global Trends report. Published every four years since 1997, Global Trends assesses the key Wtrends and uncertainties that will shape the strategic environment for the United States during the next two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • GCHQ): New Accommodation Programme
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ): New Accommodation Programme Twenty–third Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 5 May 2004 HC 65 Published on 15 June 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £10.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Allan MP (Liberal Democrat, Sheffield Hallam) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Mrs Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Jon Cruddas MP (Labour, Dagenham) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow Pollock) Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Nigel Jones MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheltenham) Ms Ruth Kelly MP (Labour, Bolton West) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, West Renfrewshire) Mr Siôn Simon MP (Labour, Birmingham Erdington) Mr Gerry Steinberg MP (Labour, City of Durham) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) The following was also a member of the Committee during the period of this inquiry. Mr Nick Gibb MP (Conservative, Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Mr George Osborne MP (Conservative, Tatton) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Impact of Revealing the Ultra Secret
    DOCID: 3827029 Harold C. Deutsch UNCLASSIFIED @>pproved for Release bv NSA on 10-26-2006. FOIA Case# 51639 The Historical Impact of Revealing The Ultra Secret (Reprinted, with permission from Parameters Journal ofthe U.S. Army War College) We really should not have been greatly surprised. Enigma messages.3 To say this much was, of course, to When Group Captain (Colonel) F. W. Winterbotham·s affirm that the machine had not been invulnerable, that work, The Ultra Secrel, burst on our consciousness in its secrets had been at least partially unveiled, and that it 1974, it undoubtedly produced the most sweeping was Soviet rather than Western specialists who had sensation thus far created by an historical revelation.1 It achieved the near-impossible. Kahn did make one was sweeping. especially, in the sense of seeming to reference to the term " Ultra" but seemed to regard it as demand immediate and wholesale revision of historical merely another designation for the solving of the Japanese assumptions about virtually all that determined the course cipher system known as·· Magic." of World War II in the Atlancic sector. In view of the bombshell impact of Winterbotham's It astonishes one to reflecr on how little speculation book in the following year, it is astonishing how little there had been hitherto about the extent of codebreaking sensation resulted from the publication in 1973 of on the part of the Western Allies and how few pressures Gustave Bertrand's Et1ig"14 ou /11 p/111 grll'flde enigme de there had been on governments to answer perplexing la guerre 1939-1945.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authorized History of GCHQ, Britain's Secret Cyber-Intelligence
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 3 Studies Commentary Behind the Enigma: The Authorized History of GCHQ, Britain’s Secret Cyber-Intelligence Agency (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020). Dr. John Ferris I was asked to write the authorized history of GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) because not that many people work in the history of ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2021 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES signals intelligence, which practitioners call sigint. In fact, I may have been studying the history of that topic longer than any other scholar. Beyond that, over the years I’ve built up a reputation among siginters who are interested in history, as actually understanding the techniques of their craft, of being able to make sense of what they do and, above all, of being able to do something that was uncommon, to answer the so what? question. In this case the so what question is, all right, you've produced this material through some complex means, which may be extremely difficult, time- consuming, and sophisticated, but so what? Once you've generated that material, who cares? Who uses that material, how is it used and how can you assess how is it used? Those are questions which I've been dealing with as a historian since the 1980s, but which few other scholars have tried to tackle. So, when in 2014-15, Government Communications Headquarters decided that it needed to have an authorized history, I was the obvious candidate, in all due modesty. Why did GCHQ decide that it needed an authorized history? Signals intelligence agencies, especially Anglophone ones, have been very reticent - I might almost say anal - about maintaining secrecy for their practice.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Policing: Three Years On
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee College of Policing: three years on Fourth Report of Session 2016–17 HC 23 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee College of Policing: three years on Fourth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 29 June 2016 HC 23 Published on 9 July 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Victoria Atkins MP (Conservative, Louth and Horncastle) James Berry MP (Conservative, Kingston and Surbiton) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield, Southgate) Nusrat Ghani MP (Conservative, Wealden) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Naz Shah MP (Independent, Bradford West) Mr Chuka Umunna MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following were also members of the Committee during the Parliament. Keir Starmer MP (Labour, Holborn and St Pancras) Anna Turley MP (Labour (Co-op), Redcar) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom and in print by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]