DOCSLIB.ORG

Kerdiffstown Landfill Remediation Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kerdiffstown Landfill Remediation Project Kerdiffstown Landfill Remediation Project Kildare County Council Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) Volume 2 of 4: Main Report 32EW5604 DOC 0054 | Final August 2017 ent Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) Volume 2 of 4: Main Report Table of Authors Chapter Author(s) Company Chapter 1 Introduction Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 2 Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 3 The Need for the Proposed Project Colin Dunsmuir Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 4 Description of the Proposed Project Colin Dunsmuir Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 5 Consideration of Alternatives Colin Dunsmuir Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 6 The Consultation Process Muriel Ennis Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. TMS Environment Ltd on behalf of Chapter 7 Air Quality, Odour and Climate Imelda Shanahan Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. TMS Environment Ltd on behalf of Chapter 8 Noise and Vibration Tom Ryan Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Macro Works Ltd on behalf of Jacobs Chapter 9 Landscape and Visual Richard Barker Engineering Ireland Ltd. Irish Archaeological Consultancy on Chapter 10 Archaeology, Cultural Heritage and Architectural Faith Bailey behalf of Jacobs Engineering Ireland Heritage Ltd. Chapter 11 Biodiversity Corey Cannon Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 12 Soils, Geology, Contaminated Land and Groundwater Mark Burston Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 13 Water – Hydrology Oonagh Duffy Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 14 Traffic and Transport Joseph Campbell Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 15 Waste Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 16 Population and Human Health Emily King Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 17 Material Assets Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 18 Environmental Interactions Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 19 Schedule of Environmental Commitments Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. Chapter 20 Summary of Residual Impacts Rachel Kelly Jacobs Engineering Ireland Ltd. 32EW5604 DOC 0054 Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) Volume 2 of 4: Main Report Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 20 1.1 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................................................... 20 1.2 Kerdiffstown Landfill Remediation Project (the proposed Project) ............................................................ 20 1.3 Client.......................................................................................................................................................... 20 1.4 Objectives of the Proposed Project ........................................................................................................... 20 1.5 Environmental Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................... 20 1.6 Report Structure ........................................................................................................................................ 22 2. Approach to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ....................................................................... 23 2.1 Introduction to the EIA Process ................................................................................................................. 23 2.2 EIA Screening Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 EIA Scoping ............................................................................................................................................... 25 2.4 EIA Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 26 3. The Need for the Proposed Project ....................................................................................................... 29 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 29 3.2 Site History ................................................................................................................................................ 29 3.3 Project Boundaries .................................................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Current Site Layout .................................................................................................................................... 33 3.5 The Need for the Proposed Project ........................................................................................................... 36 3.6 Area Surrounding the Proposed Project .................................................................................................... 41 3.7 Current Environmental Controls ................................................................................................................ 42 3.8 Needs for the Proposed Project – Waste Policy Perspective ................................................................... 47 3.9 Local Policy Context .................................................................................................................................. 47 3.10 References ................................................................................................................................................ 48 4. Description of the Proposed Project ..................................................................................................... 49 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 49 4.2 Main Features of the Proposed Project ..................................................................................................... 50 4.3 Proposed Works and Methods .................................................................................................................. 70 4.4 Commissioning .......................................................................................................................................... 76 4.5 Raw Material Requirement and Sourcing.................................................................................................. 77 4.6 Waste Recovery and Disposal .................................................................................................................. 77 4.7 End-Use, Aftercare and Maintenance ....................................................................................................... 78 4.8 Vulnerability of the Project to Risks of Major Accidents and/or Disasters ................................................. 82 4.9 Guidance ................................................................................................................................................... 86 5. Consideration of Alternatives ................................................................................................................ 87 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 87 5.2 Alternative Locations ................................................................................................................................. 87 5.3 Alternative Layouts .................................................................................................................................... 88 5.4 Alternative Designs .................................................................................................................................... 94 5.5 Alternative Processes ................................................................................................................................ 99 5.6 References .............................................................................................................................................. 113 6. The Consultation Process .................................................................................................................... 114 32EW5604 DOC 0054 1 Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) Volume 2 of 4: Main Report 6.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 114 6.2 Public and Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed End-Use .................................................................. 115 6.3 EIA Scoping Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 118 6.4 Result of EIAR Scoping Consultation ...................................................................................................... 119 6.5 Consultation Feedback ............................................................................................................................ 122 6.6 Ongoing Consultation .............................................................................................................................. 122 7. Air Quality, Odour and Climate ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme
    M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief of Evidence (Including Traffic, Non-agricultural Material Assets, Waste, Hydrology, Inter-relationships & Cumulative Impacts) by Eileen McCarthy BE., MICE, MIEI, PE Main Brief / FINAL M7 Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme Main Brief 1. Introduction 1.1 My name is Eileen McCarthy. I am an Associate Director with Arup. I hold an honours degree in Civil Engineering from University College Cork (UCC) (1987). I am a Chartered Member of the Institute of Civil Engineers in London, a Chartered Member of Engineers Ireland and a licensed professional engineer in USA. 1.2 I have over 25 years relevant experience and in particular, managed the planning and design for various road schemes including M20 Cork – Limerick Motorway Scheme, M7/N24 Ballysimon Road Improvement Scheme, N22 Baile Bhuirne to Macroom scheme and the Naas Southern Ring Road in Kildare. 1.3 I have been directly responsible for the project management of the M7 Osberstown Interchange and R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme since commencement of work on this application to An Bórd Pleanála in October 2012. I will be assisted as required by members of our design team when addressing specific queries which may arise during cross-examination. 1.4 The objective of my brief of evidence is to set the scene at the commencement of this hearing. I am mindful of the Boards direction to avoid repetition of the contents of the Environmental Impact statement, and therefore, make reference to various sections of the EIS throughout as opposed to repetition.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment at Naas Town Hall, Main Street, Naas County Kildare
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AT NAAS TOWN HALL, MAIN STREET, NAAS COUNTY KILDARE LICENCE NUMBER: 18E0515 FOR: KILDARE COUNTY COUNCIL I.T.M.: 689221/719481 LICENCEE: DAVE BAYLEY NOVEMBER 2018 Naas Town Hall, Main Street, Archaeological Testing Naas, Co. Kildare Licence Number: 18E0515 ABSTRACT Irish Archaeological Consultancy Ltd has prepared this report on behalf of Kildare County Council, to study the impact, if any, on the archaeological and historical resource of the proposed redevelopment of the Naas Town Hall, which is located on Main Street, Naas, Co. Kildare (ITM 689221/719481). The testing was undertaken by David Bayley and Muireann Ní Cheallacháin of IAC Ltd under licence 18E0515. The proposed development area is located in the townland of Naas West, parish of Naas, and barony of Naas North. The eastern boundary of the site is on the townland boundary with Naas East, Main Street North. The proposed development area is within the zone of potential for the historic town of Naas (RMP KD019-030). The proposed development area contains the site of a recorded monument, the site of White Castle (KD019-030018). The existing town hall, which was formerly a gaol, is also listed within the Record of Protected Structures for Kildare (RPS NS 19-047) and the NIAH building survey (NIAH 11814041). Four site investigation test pits were excavated in the rear yard during June 2018, which were archaeologically monitored. One test trench and one test pit were excavated within the rear yard in October 2018. The works confirmed the presence of an overburden layer within the yard area and identified the footing of a stone and mortar wall to the immediate west of the town hall structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Executive's Report
    Chief Executive’s Report On submissions/observations received to the Draft Naas Local Area Plan 2021 - 2027 Appendix 1: Summary of Submissions/Observations Received The submissions summarised in Appendix 1 exclude the following: • Submissions No. 1 to 12 inclusive. These submissions are from the Prescribed Authorities and are summarised in Section 3 of the Chief Executive’s Report. • Submissions that relate to the requests for the zoning of land. These submissions are summarised in Section 4 of the Chief Executive’s report and refer to the following submissions: 92, 118, 166, 210, 243, 245, 260, 298, 321, 335, 343, 344, 349, 355, 360, 446, 456, 467, 482, 504, 506, 508, 524, 548, 552, 594, 598, 615, 646, 656, 657, 658, 666, 667, 668, 675, 676, 678, 679, 680, 686, 694, 696. Sub. Name Summary of Submission No. 013 M Murphy The submission relates to Permeability Measure 63. The submission does not understand the need for this as there is already an entrance from the R445. The proposed pathway is approximately 50 meters from the existing one and serves no additional benefit to the community. Negative implications: • Health and safety risk for children to have another entrance\exit to busy road. • Security risk to the residence of the estate. • Creates a walk-through area where increased footfall will have a negative effect on the privacy and security of the residents. • Risk entrance will encourage loitering and anti-social behaviour. • Litter will increase from additional footfall. • Use of bicycles along a quiet walkway is a danger to people walking. Submission believes the proposal is a total waste of taxpayers’ money and could recommend several ways where the money could be better spent to improve the community.
    [Show full text]
  • An Bord Pleanála ASSISTING INSPECTOR's REPORT TO
    An Bord Pleanála Ref.: HA0046 / MA0013 An Bord Pleanála ASSISTING INSPECTOR’S REPORT TO SENIOR INSPECTOR NATURE AND PURPOSE OF REPORT: To inform the report of the Board’s Senior Inspector on traffic and transport issues arising, including the adequacy of baseline information, the assessment of the likely impacts on traffic and transportation and the appropriateness and validity of traffic modelling; the need for the scheme having regard to policy provision, the strategic function of the road and road safety; and detailed design issues having regard to relevant roads standards. Local Authority : Kildare County Council. Proposed scheme : M7 Osberstown Interchange and R407 Sallins Bypass scheme. Dates of Site Inspection : 08/05/14 and 15/05/14 Date of oral hearing : 3rd , 4 th and 6th of June 2014 Inspector : John Desmond HA0046 / MA0013 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 65 Part A 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.1 The application site, comprising those lands contained within the indicated boundary in drawings figure 1.2 ‘Proposed Scheme Layout’, of EIS Volume 3, can be best described in three sections. • The proposed Osberstown Interchange entails work along a c.1.6km length of the M7 extending west / southwest from the underbridge to the Grand Canal Naas line. The proposed interchange is located at approximately the point of an existing agricultural access overbridge. The site extends to (and includes part of) the existing roundabout on the Western Distributor Road in Millennium Park, Naas, c.250m from the existing edge of the M7 mainline and c.200m to the north of the existing edge of the mainline where it will connect to the Sallins bypass.
    [Show full text]
  • M7 NAAS NEWBRIDGE BYPASS UPGRADE, M7 OSBERSTOWN INTERCHANGE, R407 SALLINS BYPASS M7 Naas Newbridge Bypass Upgrade, Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass
    NOAC Customer Service Workshop Niall Morrissey Director of Services Roads Transportation and Public Safety Kildare County Council M7 NAAS NEWBRIDGE BYPASS UPGRADE, M7 OSBERSTOWN INTERCHANGE, R407 SALLINS BYPASS M7 Naas Newbridge Bypass Upgrade, Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass This contract consists of three major elements Widening the existing M7 motorway from two lanes to three lanes both eastbound and westbound for approximately 14km, between Junction 9 Naas North, at Maudlins (Perpetual Motion Ball) and the M7/M9 interchange at Junction 11 Replacing and relocating the existing ramps at Junction 10 Naas South to the main Naas Newbridge dual carriageway, construction of a new interchange at Osberstown between Junctions 9 and 10 which will be designated Junction 9a The Sallins Bypass which includes approximately 1.7km of Dual Carriageway and 2.0km of single carriageway, together with a 1.2km single carriageway link road from the Bypass to Sallins town centre The scheme includes 6 new structures, including two bridges over the River Liffey, a bridge over the Grand Canal, the new Osberstown Interchange bridge over the M7 motorway, a road bridge carrying Osberstown Road over the Sallins Bypass and a bridge under the Dublin Cork railway line M7 Naas Newbridge Bypass Upgrade, Osberstown Interchange & R407 Sallins Bypass Building on Recovery – Capital Investment Programme 2016 – 2021 Project Ireland 2040 NDP 2018 - 2027 Unique funding partnership Transportation Infrastructure Ireland Department of Transport Tourism and
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Section Page 18.0 Cultural Heritage
    December 2008 -i- 07507150231 Environmental Impact Statement A.2 Walshestown Pit Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 18.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE & ARCHAEOLOGY........................................ 18-1 18.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 18-1 18.1.1 Outline of Scope of Works .................................................... 18-1 18.2 Methodology .................................................................................... 18-2 18.2.1 Consultations........................................................................ 18-2 18.3 Existing Environment ....................................................................... 18-4 18.3.1 The Landscape..................................................................... 18-4 18.3.2 Historical and archaeological background............................. 18-4 18.3.3 Prehistoric Period ................................................................. 18-4 18.3.4 Early Medieval Period........................................................... 18-4 18.3.5 Medieval period .................................................................... 18-7 18.3.6 The Later Medieval Period.................................................... 18-8 18.3.7 The Post-Medieval Period .................................................... 18-9 18.3.8 Protected Structures............................................................. 18-9 18.4 Archaeological Assessment ............................................................18-14 18.4.1 Cartographic
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report
    An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report Applications : 09.HA0046 M7 Osberstown Interchange and R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme : 09.MA0013 Kildare County Council M7 Osberstown Interchange Upgrade Motorway Scheme Order 2013 : 09.KA0031 Kildare County Council M7 Osberstown Interchange and Sallins Bypass Scheme, Compulsory Purchase Order 2013 Applicant : Kildare County Council Site Inspections : 13 th and 19 th March, 6 th , 15 th and 17 th May 2014 Oral Hearing : 3 rd , 4 th and 6 th June 2014 Inspectors : Mairead Kenny and John Desmond HA0046 / MA0013 / KA0031 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 75 INTRODUCTION The report concerns the proposed M7 Osberstown Interchange and R407 Sallins Bypass Scheme and considers three concurrent applications KA0031, MA0013 and HA0046. The report should be read in conjunction with the accompanying report of Mr John Desmond, Planning Inspector which addresses the traffic and transport impacts of the scheme, the modelling undertaken, the need for the scheme, alternatives investigated and related matters. A related scheme is before the Board at present, namely the M7 Naas to Newbridge Bypass Upgrade Scheme. The two schemes have a physical interface at the proposed Osberstown Interchange. The applicant states that the operation of this scheme prior to the Naas to Newbridge Bypass Upgrade would not be feasible for reasons of traffic capacity. Cumulative impacts arising are considered in the EIS. The current scheme may be constructed in two phases, the Osberstown Interchange and the Sallins Bypass. The prior construction and operation of Osberstown Interchange is assessed as an ‘interim scenario’. The Board has previously considered an application for an interchange at this, albeit one of lesser capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Inception Report
    Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Inception Report IBE0600Rp0008_F02/Aug2012 rpsgroup.com/ireland Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Inception Report DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title Eastern CFRAM Study Document Title IBE0600Rp0008_HA09 Inception Report_F02 Document No. IBE0600Rp0008 DCS TOC Text List of Tables List of Figures No. of This Document Appendices Comprises 1 1 144 1 1 5 Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date D01 Preliminary Various M Brian G Glasgow Belfast Internal Feb 2012 D02 Draft Various M Brian G Glasgow Belfast Mar 2012 F01 Draft Final Various M Brian G Glasgow Belfast July 2012 F02 Final Various M Brian G Glasgow Belfast Aug 2012 rpsgroup.com/ireland Copyright: Copyright - Office of Public Works. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission of the Office of Public Works. Legal Disclaimer: This report is subject to the limitations and warranties contained in the contract between the commissioning party (Office of Public Works) and RPS Group Ireland. Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Inception Report – FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THIS INCEPTION REPORT ............................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Hydrometric Area 09 ........................................................................................ 3 1.1.2 Dodder CFRAM Study and Tolka
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage
    Roughan & O’Donovan – AECOM Alliance Kildare County Council Consulting Engineers M7 Naas to Newbridge By-Pass Upgrade Scheme Chapter 13 Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage 13.1 Introduction This report assesses the impact, if any, on the archaeological, architectural and cultural heritage resource of the proposed M7 Widening from Greatconnell to Johnstown, Co Kildare (OS Sheet 19), including the proposed upgrade of Newhall Interchange (Refer Figure 1.1, EIS Volume 3). This study determines, as far as reasonably possible from existing records, the nature of the cultural heritage resource in and within the vicinity of the proposed scheme using appropriate methods of study. Desk-based assessment is defined as a programme of study of the historic environment within a specified area or site that addresses agreed research and/or conservation objectives. It consists of an analysis of existing written, graphic, photographic and electronic information in order to identify the likely heritage assets, their interests and significance and the character of the study area, including appropriate consideration of the settings of heritage assets (Institute of Field Archaeologists 2012). This leads to the following: Determining the presence of known archaeological and built heritage sites that may be affected by the proposed development; Assessment of the likelihood of finding previously unrecorded archaeological remains during the construction programme; Determining the impact upon the setting of known cultural heritage sites in the surrounding area; Suggested mitigation measures based upon the results of the above research. The study has been carried out in accordance with the Code of Practice that was agreed between the NRA and the Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands (now the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, DoAHG) and EPA Guidelines and advice notes (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Database Irish Historical Statistics Database of Irish Historical Statistics - Agricultural Crops Notes 2
    Database of Irish Historical Statistics - Agricultural Crops Notes 1 Database Irish Historical Statistics Database of Irish Historical Statistics - Agricultural Crops Notes 2 Datasets in the Irish Database Agricultural Statistics: Agriculture Crops Stock Census Statistics Age Housing Population Language Literacy Occupations Registrar General Statistics Vital Statistics Births Marriages Deaths Emigration Miscellaneous Statistics Famine Relief Board of Works Relief Works Scheme Database of Irish Historical Statistics - Agricultural Crops Notes 3 Agricultural Statistics Annual statistics were collected each year of crops acreages and livestock numbers from 1847. The spatial units used by the census enumerators were as follows: The database holds agricultural data for each year from 1847 to 1871 thereafter data is decennial by which time information was no longer collected for baronies. Agriculture Crops (acreages) Baronies 1852-1871 Counties 1881, 1891, 1901, 1911 Electoral Divisions 1847-51 Poor Law Unions 1852-1871, 1881, 1891, 1901, 1911 Stock Baronies 1847-1871 Counties 1881, 1891, 1901, 1911 Poor Law Unions 1847-1871, 1881, 1891, 1901, 1911 Spatial Unit Table Name County crops81_cou County crops91_cou County crops01_cou County crops11_cou Barony crops52_bar Barony crops53_bar Barony crops54_bar Barony crops55_bar Barony crops56_bar Barony crops57_bar Barony crops58_bar Barony crops59_bar Barony crops60_bar Barony crops61_bar Barony crops62_bar Barony crops63_bar Barony crops64_bar Barony crops65_bar Barony crops66_bar Barony crops67_bar
    [Show full text]
  • The Mid-East Project Ireland 2040 in the Mid-East
    The Mid-East Project Ireland 2040 in the Mid-East The Mid-East (Eastern and Midlands Regional Assembly) Key Facts and Projects NSO 1 - Compact Growth 627 new social housing builds in the Mid-East in 2018 3,321 total new dwelling completions in the Mid-East in 2018 11 successful applicants to the Urban Regeneration and Development Fund NSO 2 - Enhanced Regional Connectivity The M7 Naas to Newbridge Bypass Widening – implementation/construction stage M11 Capacity Enhancement (Phase 1 & Phase 2) – planning/design stage Slane Bypass – detailed appraisal stage NSO 3 - Strengthened Rural Economies and Communities 10 projects were approved for funding from the first call of the Rural Regeneration and Development Fund NSO 4 - Sustainable Mobility The Dart Expansion Programme to Drogheda, Celbridge and Maynooth. Initial sequencing of investment in the Mid-East will focus on electrification of these lines NSO 5 - A Strong Economy, supported by Enterprise, Innovation and Skills 13,088 in IDA supported employment, 20,266 in EI supported employment 187 in Údarás supported employment 1 successful applicant for the latest round of the Regional Enterprise Development Fund 2 successful applicants for the latest round of the Disruptive Technologies Innovation Fund NSO 6 - High Quality International Connectivity The Mid-East will benefit from its close access to Dublin Port and Airport and the ongoing investment in both NSO 7 - Enhanced Amenity and Heritage Improve the condition and visitor experience at National Monument sites such as Brú na Bóinne Over €700,000 has been allocated to enhance access to the Wicklow Mountains National Park 218 successful applicants from the Mid-East in the last round of the Sports Capital Programme The average sports capital grant for the region was €33,495 NSO 8 - Climate-Resilient Society Ten flood relief schemes including the Arklow Flood relief Scheme NSO 9 - Sustainable Management of Water and other Environmental Resources There are currently 15 water and waste water projects in progress in the Mid-East e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 9 : Cultural Heritage
    ’s Land Restoration Ltd Behan Lands at Blackhall, Co. Kildare Waste Licence Application : Environmental Impact Statement Restoration of Former Gravel Quarry SECTION 9 : CULTURAL HERITAGE 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.1.1 Background This section of the EIS outlines the Architectural, Archaeological and Cultural Heritage issues with respect to proposed quarry restoration project at Blackhall, Punchestown, Co. Kildare. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process for anticipating the effects on the environment caused by a development. An Environmental Impact Statement is the document produced as a result of that process (EIS). Where effects are identified that are unacceptable, these can then be avoided or reduced during the design process (Environmental Protection Agency 2003:1). This study determines, as far as reasonably possible from existing records, the nature of the cultural heritage resource within the area of proposed development using appropriate methods of study. Desk based research is defined as an assessment of the known or potential archaeological resource within a specified area consisting of a collation of existing written and graphic information. The assessment takes place in order to identify the likely character, extent, quality and worth of the known or potential archaeological resource in order to make an assessment of its merit in context, leading to one or more of the following: The formulation of a strategy to ensure the recording, preservation or management of the cultural heritage resource; The formulation of a strategy for further investigation, whether or not intrusive, where the character and value of the resource is not sufficiently defined to permit a mitigation strategy or other response; The formulation of a proposal for further archaeological investigation within a programme of research.
    [Show full text]