ADAMS COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

670 Old Harrisburg Road, Suite 100 | Gettysburg, PA 17325 Ph: 717-337-9824 | Fx: 717-334-0786 Sherri Clayton-Williams, AICP, Director

Date: January 21, 2021

To: Adams County Transportation Planning Organization (ACTPO) Committee Members

From: Andrew D. Merkel, AICP Assistant Director/Comprehensive Planning Manager

Subject: ACTPO Meeting: January 27, 2021

The next meeting of the ACTPO Committee is Wednesday, January 27,20221 from 1:00-3:00 p.m. This meeting will be held virtually. Instructions to access the meeting are included in the meeting notice email. Attached, please find the following documents:

1) Draft agenda for the January 27th ACTPO meeting, 2) Current ACTPO Board Membership list, 3) Draft minutes from the October 28, 2020 ACTPO meeting, 4) FFY 2020 Adams County Obligation Report, 5) SARAA 2021 Five Year Plan for Gettysburg Regional Airport, 6) Act 106 of 2020 - Personal Delivery Devices Summary, 7) PennDOT Pathways Summary 8) Adams County Performance Measures (PM-1) Target Setting Letter, 9) Adams County Performance Measures (PM-2 & PM-3) Target Setting Letter, 10) Administrative Actions for the 2021-2024 TIP, 11) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Candidate Projects Information, 12) Articles and submitted comments.

Anyone needing special meeting accommodations should contact Andrew Merkel at 717-337-9824 or [email protected] at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Adams County Transportation Planning Organization January 27, 2021 1:00 – 3:00 P.M. 1. Introductory Comments – Bob Gordon, ACTPO Chairman 2. ACTPO Re-organization / Selection of Officers a. Chair b. Vice-Chair 3. Approval of Minutes: October 28, 2020 4. Staff Updates – ACOPD a. HOP / Traffic Study / Project Meetings b. Local Bridge Update – Adams County Bridge Engineer c. FFY 2020 Adams County Obligation Report d. SARAA – 2022 Five Year Plan for Gettysburg Regional Airport e. Act 106 of 2020 – Personal Delivery Devices f. PennDOT Pathways Program 5. Transit Update a. Commuter Services of Pennsylvania Update b. Appoint of Laura Neiderer as SRTP Alternate Member (Action Needed) c. Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Update 6. Performance Measures for Adams County – Adams County a. Safety Performance Measures (PM-1) (Action Needed) b. Pavement/Bridge Performance Measures (PM-2) c. System Performance Measures (PM-3) (Action Needed) 7. Long Range Transportation Plan Update – Adams County a. Sub Committee for LRTP b. Title VI, PPP, LEP c. Draft LRTP Outline d. Public Participation – Survey Strategy 8. 2021-2024 TIP Update – PennDOT, Adams County a. Administrative Actions b. HSIP Line Item Candidate Projects 9. Penn DOT Comments 10. FHWA Comments 11. Public Comments a. Submitted Written Comments b. Open Public Comment Period 12. Member Comments 13. Next Meeting, Time and Place a. 2021 ACTPO Meetings • April 28, 2021 • July 28, 2021 • October 27, 2021 (tentative until the dates of the 2021 Fall Statewide Planning Partners Meeting are known) Adams County Transportation Planning Organization Board

Voting members

Adams County Boroughs Association 3 Voting Members

David Bolton, Vice-Chair Borough of Abbottstown

David Laughman Arendtsville Borough

David Hazlett Carroll Valley Borough

Alternate: Anne Geiger East Berlin Borough

Adams County Townships Association 3 Voting Members

Robert Jackson Liberty Township

Robert Gordon, Chair Hamiltonban Township

Bob Rhoads Mt. Pleasant Township

Alternate: Vacant

Adams County Commissioners 1 Voting member

Jim Martin, Commissioner

Adams County Transportation Planning Organization Board

Adams County Planning Commission 1 Voting member

Charles “Skip” Strayer

Alternate: John Lerew, Chairman

Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority 1 Voting member

Beth Nidam

Alternate: Rich Farr

Gettysburg-Adams County Area Chamber of Commerce 1 Voting member

Peter Martin

Alternate: Darlene Brown

Adams County Industrial Development Authority 1 Voting member

Robin Fitzpatrick

PennDOT Central Office 1 Voting member

Brian Hare

Alternate: Ray Green Anthony Sansone Beth Raves

PennDOT District 8 1 Voting member

Nathan Walker

Alternate: Michelle Tarquino Adams County Transportation Planning Organization Board

Non-voting, ex-officio members:

State Representatives

Torren Ecker, Representative, District 193 Alternate: Catherine Wallen

Dan Moul, Representative, District 91 Alternate: Chris Kimple

Senator Doug Mastriano - District 33 Alternate: Bev Frey

Federal Representatives and Agencies Congressman John Joyce, PA 13th District Alternate:

Steven Sims / Kristina Heister / Zach Bolitho Gettysburg National Military Park

Jennifer Crobak, Transportation Planner U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Pennsylvania Division Office

Local Agencies Megan Shreve, Executive Director South Central Community Action Program

Mr. William D. Cameron, P.E. Adams County Bridge Engineer

Mr. Jerry Hartman Penn DOT Maintenance District 8-1

Gary Laird, President Hanover Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee

Will Clark York County Planning Commission

Warren P. Bladen Adams County Department of Emergency Services Adams County Transportation Planning Organization Board

Past Chairmen Edwin Calvert Theodore (Ted) Streeter Rich Farr Adams County Transportation Planning Organization (ACTPO) Minutes for the Committee Meeting on October 28, 2020

Attendance: Voting Members Bob Gordon Hamiltonban Township, (Chair) David Scotty Bolton Abbottstown Borough, ACBA (Vice-Chair) David Laughman Arendtsville Borough Robert Jackson Liberty Township Jim Martin Adams County Commissioner Beth Nidam CPTA – Rabbittransit Robin Fitzpatrick Adams County Economic Alliance Anthony Sansone PennDOT Central Office Nathan Walker PennDOT District 8-0 David Hazlett Carroll Valley Borough Charles “Skip” Strayer Adams County Planning Commission

Legislative Representatives Bev Frey Senator Mastriano’s Office Catherine Wallen Representative Ecker’s Office

Adams County Office of Planning and Development Sherri Clayton-Williams Andrew Merkel Laura Neiderer

Others Rich Farr CPTA - Rabbittransit Judie Butterfield Gettysburg Borough Kandi Fox Commuter Services Will Cameron County Bridge Engineer Michelle Tarquino PennDOT District 8-0 Jeff Puher PennDOT District 8-0 Anne Geiger East Berlin Borough Charlotte Shaffer Conewago Township Supervisor (Chair) Jim Van Dyke Upper Adams School District – Transportation Director

Media None

1. Introductory Comments Mr. Gordon called the meeting to order just after 1:00pm. Ms. Neiderer took roll-call. It was established that a quorum was present.

2. Approval of Minutes Mr. Bolton motioned to approve the July 29, 2020 minutes. Mr. Martin seconded, and the minutes were approved by a unanimous vote.

3. Staff Updates - ACOPD a. Mr. Merkel reported on the list of development projects that have submitted applications for Highway Occupancy Permits. Mr. Laughman asked if the project list is a standard flow of projects, an increase in current projects, or a reignition of projects that were put hold. He made note that the list of projects seems longer this time around. Mr. Merkel confirmed that the list of projects is longer and that possibly the changes to the PennDOT system could be playing a roll in that, as automatic notifications are now generated. He stated that in the past when the system was not as automated, the MPO may not have seen the projects that didn’t make it to the stage in the process which required a meeting that included the MPO. He mentioned that there does seem to be an uptick in the number, however it’s not clear exactly why that is. He mentioned that the availability of particular types of units available in the real estate market could also be playing a factor. b. Mr. Cameron reported that the 2020 interim bridge inspections are wrapping up, and there have been no major changes to bridge conditions. He noted that the routine biennial inspections will begin in the spring of 2021, which is the full cycle of inspections. He reported that construction has proceeded on Adams County bridge Number 5, the Shorb’s Mill Bridge rehabilitation project and it is expected to be completed in the summer of 2021. Lastly, they are preparing the design of the next bridge maintenance for the county owned bridges. Mr. Bolton asked if there are any resources for the local bridges that need repairs, but not currently programmed. Mr. Merkel explained that three of the five local bridges that are rated as poor condition are being programmed. Bridge funds were affected by the formula change made during the last TIP update, but we have tried to keep some of the local bridges programmed. Currently, the Country Club Rd bridge and Golden Rd bridge are next on the list as funds become available on the TIP. Mr. Laughman asked how the budget reduction will affect the projects already programmed on the TIP, if there are no funds available for that part of the TIP. Mr. Merkel said hopefully the cycle of one local bridge being in construction and one local bridge being in the design phase can continue. Mr. Laughman clarified his question and asked how the lost revenue from the state shutdown will affect the TIP. Mr. Merkel noted that PennDOT is making some efforts to adjust project amounts, but the effects are not yet known. c. Mr. Merkel reported on Eastern Regional Operations Plan that addresses reliability, mobility, and congestion. The plan covers the major projects listed in Adams county including; Gettysburg Signal Improvements, US 15 Corridor Incident Management, and US 30 Fiber Deployment. Mr. Bolton mentioned that Community Media is working on a broadband project utilizing fiber along Rt 30 and asked to be informed of any updates on the topic.

4. Transit Update a. Ms. Fox reported for Commuter Service of Pennsylvania. She reported that 86 new members joined last month. HACC and Gettysburg College are participating in college month promotions. Telework is still the leading mode. Commuter Services is looking at transit feasibility to Plainville Brands, as many employees travel from York County area. There has been an 18% increase in commuters tracking their commutes from January to August. b. Mr. Farr reported for CPTA. Ridership is at about 70%. Adams County outperformed all other fixed route services on a percentage basis. Service is operating at about 60%. CPTA received CARES funding directly from the federal government. The funds are being used to support operations, PPE purchases, security and camera systems, and call center upgrades so that representatives can work from home if the need be. A grant is being submitted to FTA for plexiglass barriers for the drivers. A pilot application has been submitted to PennDOT for fixed route service connecting Gettysburg and Hanover through New Oxford, focusing on employment opportunities. At Home in Adams County collaborated on that study. CPTA has also advanced different programs for veterans, including shared ride for transportation to medical services and a fixed route reimbursement program.

5. Long Range Transportation Plan Update – Adams County a. Mr. Merkel shared the list of individuals who volunteered for the sub-committee which will help provide feedback for the LRTP update. They are: Bob Gordon, David Bolton, David Laughman, Anne Geiger, Beth Nidam, Robin Fitzpatrick, Michelle Tarquino, Jeff Puher, and Jamie Lemon. b. Mr. Merkel shared the draft outline of the LRTP update. Mr. Merkel included that staff has been in contact with PennDOT and other MPOs regarding a regional travel model effort, however it is not certain that the timing will allow for the inclusion of Adams County. Mr. Merkel noted that travel demand modeling is important because it depicts where commutes occur in the region. He noted that 65% of the workforce in Adams County commutes outside of the county. c. Ms. Neiderer reported on the Title VI Review that the MPO underwent in August and September. Many documents regarding the MPOs non-discrimination process have been revised or are in the process of being revised. d. Ms. Neiderer reported on the update of the Public Participation Plan and the specific topics of the plan that will be updated. Mr. Laughman asked if there is a penalty if the MPO doesn’t receive participation from a particular population. Ms. Neiderer explained that the Title VI review is for the benefit of the MPO in the event there is a legal suit regarding discrimination and there is no penalty for non-compliance. She stated that although the MPO will do its best to provide opportunities for meaningful access to participation for all groups, there is no quota for receiving participation from individual populations. e. Ms. Neiderer reported on the update of the Limited English Proficiency Plan and the specific topics of the plan that will be updated. She stated that staff may seed advisement on various topics related to the plan, including complaint logs and LEP frequency logs.

6. Performance Measures Mr. Merkel reported on the 2019 performance measures for bridges and pavement. He mentioned that in most cases, the performance of bridges in Adams County is better than the state average. He also reported that pavement conditions in Adams County are better than the state average in all categories.

7. 2019-2022 TIP Update - PennDOT Mr. Sansone explained that there were 6 modifications made to the 2019-2022 TIP since the July ACTPO meeting. There is no action needed for administrative modifications and the 2019-2022 TIP is closed out. Mr. Bolton commented that it is nice to see some projects coming in under budget.

8. 2021-2024 TIP Update – PennDOT a. Mr. Sansone explained that a TIP amendment is proposed to add the construction phase of the RT94 and RT234 intersection project to the 2021-2024 TIP. He mentioned that it does not change the schedule of any other projects on the TIP. Mr. Bolton made a motion to approve the amendment and Mr. Strayer seconded. The motion passed unanimously. b. Mr. Sansone reported on 4 administrative modifications to the 2021-2024 TIP. c. Mr. Merkel explained that a process has been outlined by PennDOT to identify and prioritize projects for Highway Safety Improvement Funds (HSIP). He went on to explain that there are specific eligibility requirements for using HSIP funds for a project and MPO Staff met with PennDOT staff to review eligible projects in the county. He stated that staff will next meet with specific municipalities to review the projects. In January, staff will then make recommendations to the board for programming. Mr. Walker added that in July when ACTPO last met, there were no eligible projects identified for HSIP funds, so PennDOT District 8-0 staff looked at additional locations which resulted in positive cost-benefit analysis. d. Mr. Merkel presented the Federal Planning Finding Letter from the Federal Highway Administration. He explained the letter provides feedback and recommendations to the state on the planning process. He mentioned some recommendations in the letter include improvements to the long range transportation planning process, integration of performance based planning and programming and asset management, recommendations for public safety, air quality safety groups, and efforts related to public outreach. He noted in the past, the Federal Planning Finding Letter has resulted in dramatic changes to the planning process.

9. PennDOT Comments Mr. Walker reported that there have been no projects let since that last meeting in July, mostly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are four projects due to be let between now and February 2021. Mr. Gordon mentioned that the roundabout was completed in Hampton and he heard positive feedback about the projects from a resident.

10. FHWA Comments – No Comments

11. Public Comments a. Mr. Gordon explained that two written comments were received, one positive and one negative. Mr. Merkel explained that the comments were received outside of the public comment period, so they are being presented to the board. He also mentioned that because of the virtual nature of the meetings and outreach efforts currently, written comments can be submitted prior to meeting and staff will present them to the board ahead of meetings. b. Ms. Butterfield reported that Gettysburg Borough will be submitting an application for funding to the PennDOT Multi-modal Transportation Fund for the Gettysburg Interloop Phase B2. She noted that Susan Naugle is the contact for the grant application. c. Mr. Bolton noted that Abbottstown Borough is also working on an application for the Multi- modal Funding Grant for North and South German Street. The borough is seeking improvement, including resurfacing, bike lanes, and sidewalks.

12. Member Comments a. Mr. Laughman asked if there is something the MPO needs to do regarding its status as a non-attainment status of orphan maintenance. Mr. Merkel explained the designation relates to air quality performance and the designations determine if MPOs receive CMAQ funds. He went on to explain that orphan maintenance areas were areas that were noncompliant with either ozone or particulate matter standards, but because of court rulings that changed the standards, some areas were re-designated. He said it does change some technical aspects, however, the biggest impact to the board that the MPO no longer receives CMAQ funds. b. Mr. Laughman asked if any CARES funding would go to our highways and benefit Adams County’s TIP. Mr. Merkel deferred the question to Mr. Walker, who noted that at this point, and to his knowledge, PennDOT is receiving the same allocation of funds.

13. Next Meeting, Time and Place Mr. Merkel presented the tentative meeting schedule for 2021. The next meeting will be held January 27th, 2021 at 1:00 pm. The format is to-be-determined. The meeting was adjourned at 2:32 pm.

Date: 10/27/20 11:02AM FFY 2019 Adams TIP Page 1 of 1 Rpt # TIP302 FHWA Obligation Report Obligations 10/1/19 to 9/30/20

MPMS PROJECT TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR PHASE DISTRIC COUNTY STATE OBLIGATION* PROG. TOTAL FED FUNDS T ROUTE FFY 2020 FFY 2019 TO 2022 REMAINING

102333 US 15 Improvements - Adams Intersection Safety Improvements: South Ridge Road, North Ridge Road and County Line Road PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 15 $6,481,068 $6,481,068 $0 (turnarounds). Lengthen the acceleration/deceleration lanes on US 15 on the north side of the PA-94/US 15 interchange. US 15 from Adams/York County Line to South Ridge Road in Latimore and Huntington Townships. 94897 94 & 234 Intersection Imp Intersection improvement, adding left turn lanes and protected phasing to the intersection of PA 94 (Carlisle PENNDOT Final Design 8 Adams 94 $81,482 $138,225 $56,743 Pike) and PA 234 (East Berlin Road) in Reading Township, Adams County. 94897 94 & 234 Intersection Imp Intersection improvement, adding left turn lanes and protected phasing to the intersection of PA 94 (Carlisle PENNDOT Right of Way 8 Adams 94 $276,200 $276,200 $0 Pike) and PA 234 (East Berlin Road) in Reading Township, Adams County. 94897 94 & 234 Intersection Imp Intersection improvement, adding left turn lanes and protected phasing to the intersection of PA 94 (Carlisle PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 94 $1,920,293 $4,201,663 $2,281,370 Pike) and PA 234 (East Berlin Road) in Reading Township, Adams County. 105336 Baltimore Pike Rsf 3 Resurface, drainage and guide rail on PA 97 (Baltimore Pike) from SR 0194 (East King Street) to Mud PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 97 $2,474,617 $2,474,617 $0 College Road in Germany, Mount Joy, Union Townships and Littlestown Borough, Adams County. 113071 SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek This project consists of a bridge replacement on "SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek" in Conewago PENNDOT Final Design 8 Adams 116 $450,000 $450,000 $0 Township, Adams County. 113071 SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek This project consists of a bridge replacement on "SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek" in Conewago PENNDOT Utility 8 Adams 116 $100,000 $100,000 $0 Township, Adams County. 113071 SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek This project consists of a bridge replacement on "SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek" in Conewago PENNDOT Right of Way 8 Adams 116 $13,000 $13,000 $0 Township, Adams County. 73602 234 & 3001 Improvements Upgrade signing/pavement markings and minor pave/shoulder upgrade on SR 234 (Heidlersburg Road) and PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 234 $158,776 $158,776 $0 SR 3001 (Old Harrisburg Road) in Tyrone and Huntington Townships, Adams County. 18049 Mengus Mill Rd Bridge This project consists of a bridge replacement on T-438 (Mengus Mill Road) over Piney Creek in Germany PENNDOT Final Design 8 Adams 7207 $160,000 $160,000 $0 Township, Adams County. 18049 Mengus Mill Rd Bridge This project consists of a bridge replacement on T-438 (Mengus Mill Road) over Piney Creek in Germany PENNDOT Utility 8 Adams 7207 $40,000 $40,000 $0 Township, Adams County. 101480 US 30 Resurfacing #4 Resurface US Route 30 from Gettysburg Borough Line to Old Route 30 in Franklin and Cumberland PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 30 $(150,419) $0 $0 Townships, Adams County. 110654 Frederick Pike Resurface Resurface PA-194 from the Mason Dixon Line to Littlestown Borough line in Germany Township. PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 194 $(257,132) $313,778 $0

18148 Old Carlisle Rd Bridge Bridge replacement on State Route 4001 (Old Carlisle Road) over Opposum Creek in Butler Township, PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 4001 $(5,902) $0 $0 Adams County. 74952 Shippensburg Road Bridge Bridge replacement on State Route 4010 (Shippensburg Road) over Conewago Creek in Franklin and PENNDOT Preliminary Engineering 8 Adams 4010 $(1,000) $0 $0 Menallen Townships, Adams County. 74952 Shippensburg Road Bridge Bridge replacement on State Route 4010 (Shippensburg Road) over Conewago Creek in Franklin and PENNDOT Final Design 8 Adams 4010 $(159,838) $0 $0 Menallen Townships, Adams County. 74952 Shippensburg Road Bridge Bridge replacement on State Route 4010 (Shippensburg Road) over Conewago Creek in Franklin and PENNDOT Utility 8 Adams 4010 $(15,957) $0 $0 Menallen Townships, Adams County. 74952 Shippensburg Road Bridge Bridge replacement on State Route 4010 (Shippensburg Road) over Conewago Creek in Franklin and PENNDOT Right of Way 8 Adams 4010 $(15,000) $0 $0 Menallen Townships, Adams County. 74952 Shippensburg Road Bridge Bridge replacement on State Route 4010 (Shippensburg Road) over Conewago Creek in Franklin and PENNDOT Construction 8 Adams 4010 $(22,211) $0 $0 Menallen Townships, Adams County. * Negative amounts in the obligation column are a result of de-obligating unused funds for a project. De-obligation is a release of funds due to either the cancelation or completion of a project.

Federal Aviation Administration Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet Harr isburg Airports District Off ice LOCID wos Airport Gettysburg Regional Airport State PA Date of Submission 17-Nov-20 .•-,-..• FEDERAL FEDERAL Environmental ProjedStart Completion FY Description Work Code NPR Entitlement Dlsaetionary PFC STATE funds LOCALfunds TOTAL Status (MM/DD/VY) IMM/DD/YY)

Construct South Aircraft Parking Apron, Phase V 2022 (Const) STAPCO 41 s 150 s 700 s 47 s 47 s 944 Completed 11/1/2022 12/31/2024

2023 Remove Obstructions, Phase II (Acquire Easements SAOTOB 90 s 100 s 6 $ 5 s 111 Completed 11/1/2023 12/31/2024

Construct South Aircraft Parking Apron, Phase VI (Const) STAPCO 41 $ so $ 800 s 47 s 47 $ 944 Completed 11/1/2023 12/31/2D25 Construct South Aircraft Parking Apron, Phase VII 2024 (Const) STAPCO 41 s 150 $ 700 $ 47 $ 47 $ 944 Completed 11/1/2024 12/31/2026

Construct South Aircraft Parking Apron, Phase VIII 2025 (Const) STAP CO 41 $ 150 $ 700 s 47 s 47 $ 944 Completed 11/1/2025 12/31/2027

construct :,n ow Kemovat tqu,pment l!>'Kt):,torage 2026 Building, Ph I (Design) STBDSN 38 s 150 s 8 $ 8 s 166 Needs Submitted 11/1/2026 12/31/2027 Personal Delivery Devices (PDD ) What Local Municipalities Need to Know

On November 1, 2020, Senate Bill 1199 (Personal Delivery Devices) was enacted without Governor Wolf’s signature. It is now Act 106 of 2020 and will go into effect on January 30, 2021. Pennsylvania is one of 20+ states that allow for PDD CHARACTERISTICS Personal Delivery Devices (PDD). A PDD comes in all different shapes, What is a PDD? sizes, and use cases. However, Act 106 A PDD is ground­based delivery device that is manufactured for transporting cargo or goods and is operated by a driving system that allows for autonomous and/or does establish some limitations. remote operations. Per the Pennsylvania vehicle code, PDDs are classified as pedestrians and Width are afforded the same rights. PDDs must operate like a pedestrian with 32 inches or less three exceptions: 1. PDDs must yield the right­of­way to all pedestrians and pedalcyclists in a Length pedestrian area. 42 inches or less 2. PDD must travel in the same direction of traffic when traveling on a roadway or shoulder/berm. Height 3. In specific circumstances, a PDD may operate within the travel lane of 72 inches or less a roadway. Weight (w/o cargo) Where can a PDD operate? 550 pounds or less PDDs are permitted to operate in any pedestrian area (i.e. sidewalk, crosswalk, safety zone, pedestrian tunnel, overhead pedestrian crossing or similar area for Speed (pedestrian areas) pedestrians), and on a roadway or shoulder/berm of a roadway posted at 25mph 12mph or less or less. Assuming there are no limiting safety restrictions and use is practicable, PDDs shall Speed (shoulder/roadway) operate using the following priority: 25mph or less 1. Utilize the shoulder or berm of a roadway. 2. Utilize a pedestrian area such as a sidewalk. Although the law establishes maxi­ 3. Utilize the roadway as practicable to the outside edge. mums, the majority of PDDs in the US PDDs will operate in two Phases. are less than 3 feet tall and travel at Phase 1 (0‐180 days) – The PDD will be operated through an autonomous or 5mph or less. remote driving system. However, a PDD operator must be within 30 feet of the PDD and maintain line of sight of the PDD. After 180 days, a PDD will automatically transition to Phase 2 unless the authorized entity agrees to remain within Phase 1. Phase 2 (180 days+) ­ The PDD will be operated through an autonomous or remote driving system. However, a PDD must be monitored remotely and, if necessary, controlled or overridden remotely. How is a PDD Authorized? Per the law, PennDOT is responsible for developing policies governing the operations of PDDs and the application process to grant authorization. PennDOT has the sole authority to issue, approve, renew, revoke, suspend, condition or deny issuance or renewal of PDD authorizations. Per the law, a PDD application must contain: 1. Contact information; 2. List of municipalities where the PDD will operate; 3. Anticipated roadways/pedestrian areas where the PDD will operate; 4. Description of Operator training procedures; 5. Manufacturer/model of the PDD; 6. Description of how first responders would stop or disable the PDD; 7. Description of cargo the PDD will be carrying (hazardous material is prohibited); 8. Safety and maintenance inspection schedule; 9. Operating phases the PDD is capable of operating in; 10. Proof of insurance (minimum $100,000 liability); 11. Details on education campaign PDD developed for municipalities, motorists, and the general public; 12. Accident procedures; 13. List of unique identifier numbers; and 14. Any information or records deemed reasonably necessary to aid PennDOT’s review of the submitted application and for the administration, enforcement and ongoing compliance. Once authorized, an application is good for 1 year.

What authority does a municipality have? A municipality may, by ordinance or resolution, do the following: 1. Permit the use of a PDD on a roadway, or shoulder or berm of a roadway, under their jurisdiction where the posted speed limit is greater than 25mph, but not greater than 35mph. 2. Prohibit the use of a PDD on any roadway, or shoulder or berm of a roadway, or pedestrian area under their jurisdiction where the municipality, after consultation with the authorized entity, determines that the operation of the PDD would constitute a hazard. In addition, municipalities can identify a “weather emergency or other hazardous events,” and PDDs must temporarily cease or restrict operations.

What must an authority PDD entity provide a municipality? Per the law, authorized entities must: • Notify the municipality at least 30 days prior to commencing operations. • Employ an educational campaign to educate and bring awareness of PDDs to the municipality, motorists, and the general public. • Self­report to local law enforcement any accidents involving a PDD that resulted in bodily injury, death or damage to property within 24 hours of the accident.

Additional Information Additional information can be found atwww.penndot.gov/pdd . If you have any questions, please [email protected] . Pennsylvania Transportation Funding

Background Currently, the Department of Transportation receives approximately 75% of its funding from state sources and 25% of its funding from federal sources for a total of approximately $9.1 billion in annual funding. In other publications a total transportation budget of $10.1B is referenced and includes monies towards the Turnpike, State Police, debt service, and other agencies. For the purposes of this document, discussion is limited to PennDOT funding ($9.1B).

Current PennDOT Funding Overview ($ Billions) Motor License Fund $2.23 2% Public Transportation Trust Fund 22% $6.95 Multimodal Transportation Fund

State Funding Federal Funding Lottery 3% 53% 2% 2% Public Transportation Assistance Fund 16% Federal HTF Highway & Bridge

Federal HTF Public Transit

Name Source/Description % of Dept Dollar Budget Amount State Funding Motor License Fund Funded 75% by the Liquid Fuels Tax 53% $4,860M or “gas tax”, 25% through registrations and fees Public Transportation Trust Funded in large part through the 16% $1,512M Fund Turnpike payments, also sales tax and lottery fund payments. Multimodal Transportation Created by Act 89, MTF is dedicated 2% $153M Fund funding for ports, rail, aviation, and bike/ped. Lottery Funded by PA Lottery proceeds. 2% $171M Dedicated to free and reduced fare public transportation for Pennsylvanians 65 years and older. Public Transportation Funded by Fees on tires, rental 3% $258M Assistance Fund vehicles, and leased vehicles. Federal Funding

1—9/1/20

HTF Highway and Bridge Federal Highway Trust Fund dollars 22% $2,022M allocated for highway and bridge projects. HTF Public Transportation Federal Highway Trust Fund dollars 2% $204M Funding allocated for public transportation.

Funding Threats and Needs

The unmet needs represent amounts needed above the current funding levels. The threats represent potential reductions in existing funding amounts. COVID Impacts refer to the projected budget implications of the COVID-19 pandemic.

THREATS:

- Potential Federal Transportation Funding Reduction – If federal appropriations are reduced beginning in federal fiscal year 2021 due to the insolvency of the Highway Trust Fund, then PA’s highway and public transportation funding through FY 2029-30 could be reduced by a cumulative $6 billion. o Since 2008, this crisis has been averted by Congress transferring a total of $140 billion from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund. This sort-term solution may be used again. However, the inadequacy of federal gas tax revenues to fully fund the Highway Trust Fund creates a level of uncertainty in sustaining the fund into the future. The federal gas tax was last increased in 1993. - Potential Repeal of the Act 89 Vehicle Sales Tax Transfer - Beginning in FY 2022-23, when PTC payments are to be reduced, and replacement funds coming from the general fund could be in jeopardy, then public transportation funding through FY 2029-30 could be reduced by a cumulative $3.6 billion. o The PTC’s mandated payments to PennDOT’s Public Transportation Trust Fund of $450 million through FY 2021-22 and $50 million per year through 2057 are slotted to be backfilled (at a minimum of $450 million per year) with vehicle sales tax revenue that is transferred from the general fund beginning in FY 2022-23. This will be a negative impact to the General Fund. o Due to COVID-19 impacts there is concern whether the PTC will be able to make its FY 2020-21 payments, in which case the multimodal need estimated in the following charts would increase by an additional $450 million.

COVID-19 IMPACTS *numbers as of Sept. 1 Contact PennDOT for the latest estimates.:

- $842 Million in losses from the COVID-19 crisis – Pennsylvania’s prudent and lifesaving response to the health crisis coupled with decrease travel throughout the nation and region significantly reduced the department’s gas tax and other revenues.

Program Reductions ($ In thousands): Highway Related: Highway Construction 288,240 Highway Maintenance 297,667 Green Light Go 10,000 Reinvestment in Facilities 11,000

2—9/1/20

State Bridge 42,053 Payments to Locals 102,443 Turnpike – from Gas Tax 17,723 Other Current Year Lapses 20,000 Total Highway Related 789,126

Multimodal Related: Transfer to CFA 6,587 Public Trans Assistance Fund 45,980 Total Multimodal 52,567

Total Reductions 841,693

UNMET NEEDS:

Unmet needs refer to the needs above current funding levels.

- 1.9 Billion in unmet needs for the National Highway System. o Currently $700 Million in unmet basic annual interstate funding needs. The department has planned a gradual increase in interstate funding over the next few years that shifts funding away from traffic routes and local roads. ▪ We have identified an annual need of $1.2 billion to meet cyclical asset management needs. Currently, we spend between $450 - $500 million per year on the Interstate System. The plan put forward by the Financial Guidance Work Group will increase Interstate investment by approximately $150 million in FFY 2021 and grow the investment by $50 million/year until it reaches $1 billion (FFY 2028). o $1.2 Billion in annual unmet needs for the balance of the National Highway System (i.e. not including the interstates). The need for funding on roads outside of the interstate system was a common plea from the members of the general assembly during this year’s appropriations hearings. ▪ The previously mentioned increase in funding to the interstates will divert funding from the remainder of the system, thus growing the unmet needs for the remainder of the National Highway System. - System Modernization and Upgrades of the NHS (including Interstates) - There is an unmet annual need of $2.1 billion – 3.2 billion for modernization and upgrades to the interstate system and modest upgrades to the remainder of the NHS system. - Maintenance and Operations - In addition to approximately 40,000 miles of highway and 25,400 bridges, PennDOT owns and maintains a myriad of other assets across the state. These assets follow a life cycle of build, maintain, preserve and then repeat when the asset reaches its useful life. Each group of assets have relatively consistent required maintenance cycles for various activities to extend their useful life.

3—9/1/20

The below visual shows additional funding needs over the next 10 years. TRANSPORTATION UNMET FUNDING NEEDS (Figures in Millions of Dollars) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 National Highway System 1,900 1,995 2,095 2,199 2,309 2,425 2,546 2,673 2,807 2,948 System Modernization and Upgrades 2,100 2,205 2,315 2,431 2,553 2,680 2,814 2,955 3,103 3,258 Non-NHS and Maintenance & Operations 4,100 4,305 4,520 4,746 4,984 5,233 5,494 5,769 6,058 6,360

Facilities 50 53 55 58 61 64 67 70 74 78

Multimodal 1,200 1,260 1,323 1,389 1,459 1,532 1,608 1,689 1,773 1,862 Total Transportation Funding Need 9,350 9,818 10,308 10,824 11,365 11,933 12,530 13,156 13,814 14,505

4—9/1/20

OS-2 (12-15)

November 12, 2020

Dear Planning Organizations:

Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR § 490) regarding National Performance Management Measures for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Pennsylvania has established the 2021 targets for the following Safety Performance Measures:

1) Number of fatalities 2) Rate of fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) 3) Number of serious injuries 4) Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT 5) Number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries.

The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) is required to establish these targets by August 31st each year. The 2021 targets found in Table 1 of the enclosure are based on a data-driven trend analysis of the statewide fatality and suspected serious injury numbers (2% annual fatality reduction and maintaining level suspected serious injuries).

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are required to establish targets within 180 days of PennDOT establishing its targets (by February 27, 2021) either by agreeing to plan and program projects in support of the PennDOT targets, or by establishing their own quantifiable targets. For consistency, PennDOT is requesting Rural Planning Organizations (RPOs) follow the same procedure. Table 2 of the enclosure reflects values for your MPO/RPO based on the same methodology that was used at the state level.

MPOs/RPOs wishing to establish their own quantifiable targets are requested to coordinate with PennDOT as early as possible, but no later than December 31, 2020.

A state is determined to have met or made significant progress toward meeting established targets if the outcome in 4 of 5 performance measures is better than the baseline number. For Pennsylvania’s 2019 targets, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) will report this determination by March 31, 2021.

Preliminary data indicate Pennsylvania did not meet our 2019 targets and will be subject to the provisions of 23 United States Code § 148 (i). This will require the Department to submit an implementation plan that identifies gaps, develops strategies, action steps and best practices, and includes a financial and performance review of all

Office of the Deputy Secretary for Planning 400 North Street, Keystone Building, 8th Floor | Harrisburg, PA 17120 | 717.787.3154 | www.penndot.gov 2021 Safety Target Setting Page 2 November 12, 2020

HSIP funded projects. This plan will be due June 30, 2021. In addition, we will be required to obligate in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2022 an amount equal to the FFY 2017 HSIP apportionment.

For more information please visit the FHWA Safety Performance Management website at https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/spm/.

Your response is requested before February 27, 2021.

Please complete the following:

______Planning Organization Name

Select one of the following options for establishing Safety Performance Measures:

The MPO/RPO agrees to plan and program projects so that they contribute ☐ toward the accomplishment of the established statewide targets. Table 2 of the enclosure reflects the corresponding MPO/RPO values using the same methodology that was established at the state level. By selecting this option, the MPO/RPO can and should still strive to reduce fatalities and serious injuries to the greatest extent possible through the portfolio of safety projects included in their Transportation Improvement Program.

The MPO/RPO has established quantifiable targets for each performance ☐ measure for our planning area. The targets and methodology used to develop them are enclosed with this letter. This option will require PennDOT coordination with the Federal Highway Administration to ensure that the targets established are not just aspirational but achievable based on the projects that are programmed on the MPO/RPO’s Transportation Improvement Program. If choosing this option, please notify the Center for Program Development and Management (CPDM) by December 31, 2020.

Concurrence: Authorized MPO/RPO Representative Date 2021 Safety Target Setting Page 3 November 12, 2020

Should you have any questions, please contact Casey Markey, Transportation Planning Manager, Center for Program Development and Management, at 717.787.1251 or [email protected].

Sincerely, Sincerely,

Larry S. Shifflet Melissa J. Batula, P.E. Deputy Secretary for Planning Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration

Enclosure

MPO/RPO Target Setting Enclosure September 8, 2020

Table 1: Statewide Targets:

5-year Rolling Averages

Performance Measure TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE 2017-2021 2017-2021 2015-2019

Number of Fatalities 1,088.2 1154.8 Fatality Rate 1.059 1.135 Number of Serious Injuries 4,551.2 4166.6 Serious Injury Rate 4.431 4.097 Number of Non-motorized 800.8 741.6 Fatalities and Serious Injuries * Future VMT estimated to be 0.5% higher per year starting in 2020

Table 2: Adams MPO Supporting Values: 5-year Rolling Averages TARGET ACTUAL BASELINE Performance Measure 2017-2021 2017-2021 2015-2019

Number of Fatalities 11.3 12.4 Fatality Rate 1.250 1.380 Number of Serious Injuries 53.8 45.8 Serious Injury Rate 5.953 5.098 Number of Non-motorized 2.4 3.6 Fatalities and Serious Injuries * Future VMT estimated to be 0.5% higher per year starting in 2020

OS-2C (12-15)

November 18, 2020

Dear Planning Organizations:

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) and Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act established a series of performance measures to ensure effective use of Federal transportation funds. Title 23 Part 490 of the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR 490) establishes measures to assess pavements on the National Highway System (NHS), bridges carrying the NHS, and pavements on the Interstate, which are collectively referred to as the PM-2 measures. 23 CFR 490.105 establishes measures to assess the performance of the NHS, freight movement on the Interstate, and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program. These measures are collectively referred to as the PM-3 measures. More information on Transportation Performance Management (TPM) is available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/faq.cfm.

PM-2 Performance Measures include: . Percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Good condition . Percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Poor condition . Percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding the Interstate System) in Good condition . Percentage of pavements on the NHS (excluding the Interstate System) in Poor condition . Percentage of NHS bridge deck area classified as in Good condition . Percentage of NHS bridge deck area classified as in Poor condition

PM-3 Performance Measures include: . Percent of Person-miles Traveled on the Interstate System that are Reliable . Percent of Person-miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS that are Reliable . Interstate System Truck Travel Time Reliability Index . Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay (PHED) per Capita . Percent Non-Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) Travel . On-Road Mobile Source Emissions Reduction for CMAQ-funded Projects

In May 2018, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) established 2- year and 4-year targets in coordination with Pennsylvania’s Planning Partners. All MPO/RPOs agreed to support the PennDOT statewide and regional PM-2 and PM-3 targets established at that time. In June 2019, PennDOT submitted a Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) that published the PM-2 targets along with its plan to achieve them while progressing towards lowest life cycle cost planning and programming. The TAMP is available at: https://www.penndot.gov/ProjectAndPrograms/Asset-Management/Documents/PennDOT- TAMP.pdf

Deputy Secretary for Planning and Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration 400 North Street, Keystone Building, 8th Floor |Harrisburg, PA 17120 | 717.787.3154 | www.penndot.gov

2021 PM-2 and PM-3 Target Setting Page 2 November 18, 2020

PennDOT Mid Performance Period Report

PennDOT recently submitted a Mid Performance Period Progress Report to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on September 30, 2020. This progress report includes: . The actual performance derived from the latest data collected through the midpoint of the performance period; . A discussion of PennDOT’s progress toward achieving each established 2-year target; . A discussion on progress of PennDOT’s efforts in addressing congestion at truck freight bottlenecks within the state; . Adjustments to the 4-year targets for select performance measures with a discussion of the basis for the adjustment and how the revised targets support expectations in the long-range statewide transportation plan and the TAMP; . MPO CMAQ performance plans for the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC), Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) and Lancaster Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)s.

The FHWA makes a formal determination of significant progress in the achievement of 2- and 4-year targets. If significant progress is not made, states will be required to document actions to achieve targets in future performance periods. Attachments 1-3 (addressing both the PM-2 and PM-3 measures) provide a summary of the actual 2-year performance and progress toward achieving the established statewide targets. Additional information is provided on individual MPO/RPO performance for select measures.

Adjustments to 4-Year Performance Targets and Coordination

The Mid Performance Period Progress Report offers an opportunity for PennDOT and its Planning Partners to review and adjust the 4-year targets for each of the PM-2 and PM-3 performance measures. All bridge, pavement, reliability, freight and CMAQ emission targets were assessed in coordination between PennDOT and Pennsylvania’s MPO/RPOs. The CMAQ congestion and Non-SOV measure targets were reviewed by all relevant state DOT and MPO partners for each urbanized area (e.g. Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas).

PennDOT has not adjusted any of the PM-2 targets. PennDOT has adjusted the PM-3 targets as summarized in Table 1. The adjusted statewide targets were provided in PennDOT’s Mid Performance Period Progress Report to FHWA. PennDOT provided a presentation on the assessment of PM-2 and PM-3 targets at the September 16th Planning Partners call. The call included a discussion on the target setting process and requested comments on the proposed adjustments to the PM-3 target values. No MPO/RPOs indicated concerns regarding adjustments to the reliability, freight or CMAQ emission targets.

2021 PM-2 and PM-3 Target Setting Page 3 November 18, 2020

Table 1: Adjustments to Statewide PM-3 Targets (All Other PM-2 and PM-3 Targets Remain Same as Baseline Report)

Original Adjusted Measure Basis for Adjustment Target Target In the baseline report, PennDOT's target was developed to maintain status quo for operations. Based on a review of the first three years of data, there are yearly variations in the reliability measure. PennDOT has identified impacts of construction projects on reliability while work zone traffic restrictions are in effect. PennDOT’s 2021 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) has an increased focus on interstate highways, which will result in more construction projects. Major projects which will be underway in 2021 include the I-83 widening Interstate in Harrisburg, I-95 reconstruction in Delaware and Philadelphia 89.8% 89.5% Reliability Counties, the Southern Beltway interchange with I-79 near Pittsburgh, and I-81 reconstruction near Carlisle. Smaller projects like bridge rehabilitations also impact reliability when long-term lane closures are required. The target adjustment reflects a desire to maintain the status quo as planned in the baseline report while taking into account year-to- year variability with a multitude of construction scenarios. Other congestion management techniques to improve reliability will need to be planned and are beyond the timeframe of the 4-year target for this performance period.

The impacts of construction work zones on the freight reliability measure cannot be mitigated prior to the 2021 construction season. Truck PennDOT will continue to monitor data to develop appropriate Travel 1.34 1.40 mitigation strategies to improve freight reliability in future performance Time periods. The 4-year target is intended to account for anticipated Index construction projects which will impact 2021 performance and unknown freight impacts due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The original target was set assuming PM10 benefits of CMAQ projects CMAQ across the entire SPC region. The target should only be for the actual PM10 17.47 0.00 nonattainment/maintenance area which just includes Liberty Clairton. Emissions No CMAQ projects are anticipated in this area over the 4-year performance period. The statewide target was adjusted to zero. The DVRPC region is now in attainment for CO and no longer requires CMAQ CO 1135.40 250.00 a target. As such, the statewide number is adjusted only to reflect the Emissions SPC area.

2021 PM-2 and PM-3 Target Setting Page 4 November 18, 2020

MPO/RPO Target Establishment

Per federal regulations, the MPO/RPOs must establish targets no later than 180 days after PennDOT adjusts their targets. The MPO/RPOs must establish targets by either:

. Agreeing to plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the accomplishment of the relevant PennDOT target for that performance measure; or . Committing to a quantifiable target for that performance measure for their metropolitan planning area.

To ensure compliance with 23 U.S.C. §134, please respond to this letter by selecting an option for the adjusted PM-3 measures below before March 29, 2021. Note this action only applies to the measures for which PennDOT has adjusted targets.

Planning Organization Name

Please select one of the following options for the relevant PM-3 measures:

The MPO/RPO decision-making body agrees to support the adjusted statewide PM-3 ☐ targets by planning and programming projects that contribute to meeting or making significant progress toward the established PennDOT performance targets.

The MPO/RPO decision-making body commits to establishing their own quantifiable ☐ targets for these measures and has attached their methodology. MPOs/RPOs that establish their own targets will report the methodology used to develop them and are requested to coordinate with PennDOT as early as possible.

Concurrence: Date: Authorized MPO/RPO Representative

Should you have any questions, please contact Casey Markey, Transportation Planning Manager, at 717.787.1251 or [email protected].

Sincerely, Sincerely,

Larry S. Shifflet Melissa J. Batula, P.E. Deputy Secretary for Planning Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration

Enclosure 2021 PM-2 and PM-3 Target Setting Page 5 November 18, 2020

Attachment 1: Summary of Performance Measure Targets and 2-Year Performance 4-Year 4-Year 2017 2-Year (2019) 2-Year Performance Measures Original Adjusted Baseline Performance Target Target Target Percentage of Pavements of the Interstate 71.5% 60.0% System in Good Condition Percentage of Pavements of the Interstate 0.4% 2.0% System in Poor Condition

Percentage of Pavements of the Non-Interstate 47.8% 49.0% NHS in Good Condition Percentage of Pavements of the Non-Interstate

37.6% 35.0% 33.0% (Statewide) 2

Pavement NHS in Good Condition -

PM Percentage of Pavements of the Non-Interstate 15.9% 15.2% NHS in Poor Condition Percentage of Pavements of the Non-Interstate 2.0% 4.0% 5.0% NHS in Poor Condition

Percentage of NHS Bridges 23.7% 27.0% 25.8% 26.0% Classified as in Good Condition

Bridge Percentage of NHS Bridges Classified as in Poor

(Statewide) 5.1% 5.1% 5.6% 6.0% Condition

Percent of the Person-Miles Traveled on the 89.8% 89.9% 89.8% 89.8% 89.5%

Interstate That Are Reliable Percent of the Person-Miles Traveled on the 88.5% 87.4% Non-Interstate NHS That Are Reliable (Statewide) Reliability Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index 1.35 1.36 1.34 1.34 1.40

Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Per 14.6% 17.2% SOV

- Capita: Philadelphia

Annual Hours of Peak Hour 10.1% 11.8% Excessive Delay Per Capita: Pittsburgh

3 - Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (Non-

Delay and Non and Delay 27.9% 28.2% 28.0% 28.1% PM (Urbanized Area) SOV) Travel: Philadelphia – – Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (Non- 24.8% 25.5% 24.6% 24.4% CMAQ CMAQ SOV) Travel: Pittsburgh

Total Emission Reductions: PM2.5 25.870 143.210 10.760 20.490

Total Emission Reductions: NOx 971.780 971.050 337.700 612.820

Emissions Total Emission Reductions: VOC 302.380 231.780 109.460 201.730 – – (Statewide) Total Emission Reductions: PM10 24.780 0.000 9.540 0.000 CMAQ CMAQ Total Emission Reductions: CO 1135.400 2969.640 567.700 1135.400 250.000 (MPO/RPO Performance on PM-2 Measures Provided on PennDOT SharePoint Site) https://spportal.dot.pa.gov/Planning/ProgramCenter/Performance%20Reports/Forms/AllItems.aspx https://www.penndot.gov/ProjectAndPrograms/Asset-Management/Documents/PennDOT-TAMP.pdf 2021 PM-2 and PM-3 Target Setting Page 6 November 18, 2020

Attachment 2: Summary of MPO/RPO PM-3 Reliability Performance Truck Travel Time Interstate Reliability Non-Interstate Reliability Area Reliability Index (MPO/RPO) 2017 2017 2017 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Baseline Baseline Baseline Statewide 89.8% 89.6% 89.9% 87.4% 88.2% 88.4% 1.34 1.39 1.36 Total Statewide 89.8% -> Adjusted to 89.5% 87.4% 1.34 -> Adjusted to 1.40 Target 2 & 4-Year Target 4-Year Target 2 & 4-Year Target

Adams Not Applicable 86.2% 89.8% 93.4% Not Applicable Altoona 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.7% 83.9% 84.4% 1.21 1.25 1.18 Centre 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 91.3% 93.2% 94.9% 1.13 1.33 1.15 DVRPC 65.5% 66.0% 66.6% 81.2% 82.6% 83.2% 2.01 2.04 1.99 Erie 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 83.8% 86.7% 88.2% 1.25 1.23 1.29 Franklin 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.8% 96.5% 94.6% 1.08 1.11 1.09 Harrisburg 91.3% 92.7% 92.4% 91.0% 92.4% 90.3% 1.32 1.33 1.31 Johnstown Not Applicable 93.0% 94.5% 95.6% Not Applicable Lancaster 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2% 95.3% 92.1% 1.09 1.12 1.17 Lebanon 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.5% 97.7% 95.4% 1.12 1.14 1.15 Lehigh Valley 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 86.4% 84.6% 85.4% 1.32 1.34 1.35 NEPA 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 91.9% 90.9% 93.1% 1.26 1.25 1.28 North Central 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.0% 95.7% 95.6% 1.10 1.11 1.50 Northern Tier 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 99.1% 94.7% 1.24 1.17 1.18 Northwest 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% 91.5% 91.8% 1.18 1.32 1.17 Reading 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.2% 94.2% 95.0% 1.12 1.38 1.19 S. Alleghenies 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.9% 96.7% 94.2% 1.11 1.13 1.16 Scranton 98.3% 98.3% 98.2% 87.4% 90.3% 90.1% 1.39 1.28 1.35 SEDA-COG 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.7% 96.4% 96.2% 1.11 1.11 1.12 SPC 92.9% 91.6% 92.1% 87.0% 87.7% 88.9% 1.42 1.49 1.46 SVTS 99.3% 99.2% 100.0% 95.1% 96.7% 95.9% 1.18 1.59 1.14 Wayne 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1.11 1.12 1.17 Williamsport 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 98.3% 97.4% 1.16 1.18 1.19 York 100.0% 97.5% 94.9% 90.0% 89.6% 90.7% 1.22 1.32 1.28 Table Notes: . The 2- and 4-year reliability targets only apply statewide. MPO/RPO values are provided for informational purposes only. . At the mid-performance period (2019), Pennsylvania met the established 2-year target for interstate reliability. The state did not meet the 2-year truck travel time reliability index target. Although a 2-year target is not applicable to the non-interstate reliability measure, the mid-performance period data exceeds the 4-year target. . PennDOT reliability targets were originally developed based on 2017 baseline values. The goal was to maintain baseline reliability throughout the four-year performance period. MPO/RPO values indicate areas that maintained their regional baseline value (green) or worsened over the baseline (red). 2021 PM-2 and PM-3 Target Setting Page 7 November 18, 2020

Attachment 3: Summary of MPO/RPO Emission Benefits from CMAQ-Funded Projects (Listed MPO Targets are Only Included in Relevant MPO CMAQ Performance Plans – PennDOT does not report these targets as part of the Baseline and Mid-Performance Period Reports) Emissions (kg/day) 2019 2021 2021 2018-2019 Measure MPO 2-year Original Adjusted Actual 2-year Target 4-year Target 4-year Target Benefits Statewide 109.46 201.73 231.03 DVRPC (PA only) 37.61 69.31 142.79 SPC 58.06 107.00 66.76 VOC Lehigh Valley N/A N/A 20.19 Emissions Lancaster N/A 3.60 0.40 0.25 Reading N/A N/A 0.32 NEPA N/A N/A 0.72 Statewide 337.70 612.82 936.29 DVRPC (PA only) 23.42 42.50 652.4 SPC 256.11 464.77 250.00 152.55 NOx Lehigh Valley N/A N/A 126.64 Emissions Lancaster N/A 1.03 1.16 Reading N/A N/A 3.08 NEPA N/A N/A 0.46 Statewide 10.76 20.49 37.87 DVRPC (PA only) 1.08 2.06 24.21 SPC 7.01 13.35 10.00 6.21 Lehigh Valley N/A N/A 5.48 PM2.5 York N/A N/A 1.41 Emissions Harrisburg N/A N/A 0.41 Lancaster N/A 0.04 0.06 Lebanon N/A N/A 0.06 Johnstown N/A N/A 0.03

PM10 Statewide 9.54 17.47 0.00 0.00 Emissions SPC 9.54 17.47 0.00 0.00 Statewide 567.70 1135.40 250.00 133.37 CO DVRPC (PA only) 282.74 565.47 Removed Target N/A Emissions SPC 284.97 569.93 250.00 133.37 Table Notes: . Pollutant Definitions include VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds; NOx = Nitrogen Oxides; PM = Particulate Matter for specified size particles; and CO = Carbon Monoxide . Emission benefits are estimated based on the total CMAQ-funded project emission benefits as reported in FHWA's CMAQ annual database. Project benefits are calculated by PennDOT and Planning Partners using available tools. . DVRPC is now in attainment for CO and a CO target is no longer required for that region FFY 2021-2024 ACTPO TIP MODIFICATIONS FORM Oct 28, 2020 to Jan 27, 2021 $(000)

Informed ACTPO Committee: January 27, 2021 Adams MPO Administrative Modifications - Highway/Bridge Funds FFY 2021 FFY 2022 FFY 2023 FFY 2024 FFY 2023 & Remarks Item Project Title MPMS Ph Prog Fed Sta. Fed. Sta. Loc. Fed. Sta. Loc. Fed. Sta. Loc. Fed. Sta. Loc. >

94 & 234 Intersection Imp Before Adding the final design phase of 94 & 234 Intersection Imp in FFY 2021 for $21,930 to 1 94897 FD 94/026 Adjust STP 22 complete final design tasks and deliver the PSE package for bidding purposes. This Adams After STP 22 project consists of an intersection Conewago Creek Bridge Before BOF 368 105 improvement, adding left turn lanes and protected phasing to the intersection of PA Before STP 1,028 1,186 94 (Carlisle Pike) and PA 234 (East Berlin 1015/016 Adjust BOF Road) in Reading Township, Adams County. 2 78640 CON The current estimated let date is scheduled on Adjust STP -22 Feb. 25, 2021.

After BOF 368 105

Adams After STP 1,006 1,186

Increasing the construction phase of Mummasburg Road Bridge Before 185 670 Mummasburg Road Bridge in FFY 2021 for $500,000 to the current estimated cost. This Adjust 185 project consists of a bridge replacement on SR 3017 (Mummasburg Road) over Mud 3 3017/028 87435 CON Adjust 581 Run in Franklin Township, Adams County. 500 The current estimated let date is scheduled on After 185 Jan. 14, 2021. 670 Removing the utility phase of Eisenhower Adams After 581 500 Drive Extension in FFY 2021. This phase will be added back on to the 2021 TIP at a Eisenhower Drive Extension Before 581 later date when funds are needed to advance 500 the utility phase. This project consists of connecting Eisenhower Drive from High 4 58137 UTL 0/RWY Adjust 581 Street to Route 116 in Conewago Township, -500 Adams County. The current estimated let Adams After date is scheduled on Aug. 25, 2022. FFY 2021-2024 ACTPO TIP MODIFICATIONS FORM Oct 28, 2020 to Jan 27, 2021 $(000) Administrative Modifications - Highway/Bridge Funds FFY 2021 FFY 2022 FFY 2023 FFY 2024 FFY 2023 & Remarks Item Project Title MPMS Ph Prog Fed Sta. Fed. Sta. Loc. Fed. Sta. Loc. Fed. Sta. Loc. Fed. Sta. Loc. >

Cashflowing the construction phase of PA 116 over Trib Marsh Crk Before NHPP 313 1,600 MPMS 106665 "PA 116 over Trib Marsh 5 116/044 106665 CON Adjust NHPP -313 -1,300 1,613 Crk" from FFY 2023-2024 to FFY 2025- 2028. This is to better align with the current Adams After NHPP 300 estimate let date of 5/9/2024. This project Highway Reserve Before NHPP 1,600 consists of a bridge rehabilitation on PA 116 (Fairfield Road) over Tributary to Marsh 6 87793 CON Adjust NHPP 313 1,300 -1,613 Creek in Highland Township, Adams County. Adams After NHPP 1,913 1,300

Cashflowing the construction phase of SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Before NHPP 1,670 1,285 MPMS 113071 "SR 116 Bridge over 7 116/051 113071 CON Adjust NHPP -1,670 -630 1,913 387 Conewago" from FFY 2021-2022 to FFY 2023-2024. This is to better align with the Adams After NHPP 655 1,913 387 current estimate let date of9/30/2021. This Highway Reserve Before NHPP 1,913 1,300 project consists of a bridge replacement on "SR 116 Bridge over Conewago Creek" in 8 87793 CON Adjust NHPP 1,670 630 -1,913 -387 Conewago Township, Adams County.

Adams After NHPP 1,670 630 913

Before FFY Totals 4,236 0 0 2,576 0 0 3,826 0 0 2,900 0 0 0 Program Summary - Net Changes Adjustments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 After FFY Totals 4,236 0 0 2,576 0 0 3,826 0 0 2,900 0 0 0 Receive Use B/C Estimate Determine Candidate Determine Estimate Ratio and Apply Locations Life Cycle B/C Ratio PennDOT Enhance District Countermeasure Costs of Overall Benefits For From Central Costs of For All Connects Data Set Coordination Alternatives Countermeasure To Prioritize HSIP Office and Countermeasure Countermeasure Outreach (or Concepts) Alternatives Selected Funding Planning Alternatives Alternatives Partners Candidates

HSM Method Collaboration Included Costs Included Costs Present Findings Application Network Screening* Tool** • • Observed Crashes Communicate and Coordinate with • Engineering / Design • Maintenance • Utilize FHWA BCA • Develop Comparative • Use Data Gathered, • Predicted Crashes Planning Regions to Share Input on • Right-of-Way Acquisition • Operation Tool or PennDOT Table Detailing: Costs Computed, • Expected Crashes Network Screening and Selected Locations • Utility Relocation • Replacement Costs Tools A + B - Locations and B/C Results in • Excess Value (Based on Engineering Judgement for • Construction if Life Cycle is Less - Alternatives Application Process Additional Data Analysis, etc.) • Inspection Than 20 Years - B/C Ratio • Setting Priorities - Project Cost - Project Benefit

And/Or

Systemic Safety Data Expansion Studies Costs Benefits Communication Improvements • • • • Use CMF and • Screen Candidate • Provide Expanded Location Safety Study / Crash Study Calculate Future Ensure the District and Planning • KABCO Crash Data Locations Information Roadside Safety Audit (RSA) Value of All Costs Regions are Communicating with • the Municipalities Prior to any - Crash Cluster • KABCO Trend Intersection Control Candidate Being Included on the Reports • Location Notes Evaluation (ICE) - Systemic Safety TIP • Planned or Recently Crash Lists Completed Projects • Additional Comments or High-Level Potential Countermeasure Options

For Discrete Sites For Systemic Safety Locations Future Value Selection Acronyms Future Value • Identify Focus Crash Types and • Gather CMFs n • Determine the Prioritization of Screen Candidate Locations • FV = PV (1 + i ) AADT – Annual Average Daily Traffic - Determine CMFs for Projects that have B/C > 1.0 Recommended • Aggregate Locations for Proven • B/C – Benefit Cost Ratio Where: For Systemic Safety Countermeasures using Systemic Safety Countermeasures, Improvements B/C Ratio Analysis CMF – Crash Modification Factor FHWA CMF Clearinghouse such as: FV = Future Value May Not Apply – - High Friction Surface Treatment FHWA Federal Highway Administration PV = Present Value - Rumble Strips HSIP – Highway Safety Improvement Program i = Interest Rate - Cable Median Barrier n = Number of Years HSM – Highway Safety Manual - Wrong-Way Ramp Entry ISIP – Intersection Safety Implementation Plan and other strategies identified in KABCO – Injury Classification Scale the RDIP, ISIP, SMAP, and HSM Part D * K – Fatal Injury

* A – Severe Injury

* B – Moderate Injury

* C – Minor Injury SummarizeStudies Analysis SummarizeStudies Analysis

* O – Property Damage Only HSM Method - Until statewide network screening includes limited access segments, ramps, and intersections • • * containing ramp terminals, alternate methods** (such as IHSDM – Interactive Highway Safety Design Model RDIP – Roadway Departure Implementation Plan Create HSM-Based Project Create Systemic Safety Profile for Each Candidate Improvement Location Lists and ISATe – Enhanced Interchange Safety Analysis Tool) must be utilized to determine need at these – SMAP Speed Management Action Plan Location & Justification locations. The alternate method in determining need must yield output that can translate to acceptable life TIP – Transportation Improvement Program cycle costs & B/C ratios. ** Note: More safety analysis tools will likely be developed and others may become obsolete.

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) SUPPORT District 8-0 Process For Candidate Selection and Application

PROJECT NAME: HSIP LINE ITEM

MPMS ID: 87811 First Appearance on TIP: 09/21/2009

PROJECT DETAILS

Primary Improvement Type: Highway Safety Im- provement Program

State Route #: N/A

Name: N/A

Length: N/A

Geographic Limits: Adams County

Description: Highway Safety Line Item

Estimated Let Date: N/A

Estimated Year of Construction: N/A

Estimated Total Project Cost: N/A

FUNDING SOURCE

Federal: $3,516,000 (HSIP) | 2nd 4-Years: $2,637,000 (HSIP) | 3rd 4-Years: $3,516,000 (HSIP) State:

FUNDING SUMMARY Phase Previous 2021 2022 2023 2024 2nd 4-Years 3rd 4-Years

Prelim. Engineering

Final Design

Utility

Right of Way

Construction

Total $879,000 $879,000 $879,000 $879,000 $2,637,000 $3,516,000

FY 2021—2024 $3,516,000

FY 2025—2028 $2,637,000

FY 2029—2032 $3,516,000

2021—2024 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 67 County Alternative Location Description Estimated Cost Present Value Cost PA B/C PA Benefit LEGEND

Install raised median barrier with access 1 $3,202,264 $3,264,049 2.32 $7,583,182 B/C > 1.0 SR 30 - management Chambersburg Road 2 Increase clear zone $1,877,768 $2,033,663 4.21 $8,555,315

3 Install roundabout $1,862,170 $1,971,635 4.22 $8,330,078

4 SR 234 - East Berlin Change intersection skew angle $1,013,593 $1,047,775 2.65 $2,780,604 Adams Road and Stoney Point Road Relocate township owned leg of Stoney 5 Point Road (northern leg) to intersect with $1,222,729 $1,213,511 0.48 $586,625 Kimberly Lane approximately 750' east

Install traffic signal with dilemma zone 6 SR 1015 - Hanover $516,099 $611,984 10.18 $6,231,522 detection Street and Red Hill 7 Road Increase triangle sight distance $501,868 $542,479 12.59 $6,828,492

January 20, 2021 Andrew Merkel, Adams County Office of Planning & Development (ACTPO) [email protected] 670 Old Harrisburg Road Suite 100 Gettysburg, PA 17325 Phone: 717-337-9824 FAX: 717-334-0786

Dear Andrew Merkel:

After I read the Public Notice in the GBT’s today about the ACTPO Meeting via Zoom scheduled for Wednesday, January 27th at 1:00 PM, I wanted to bring these concerns and questions to your attention.

Do you plan to send an email flyer or notice about the ACTPO Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, January 27th at 1:00 PM via Zoom to the Boroughs and Townships in Adams County so they can post them on their websites and Facebook pages? Not everyone reads the Gettysburg Times, however Conewago residents do check the Township’s website and Facebook page for notices.

Essentially, the Zoom link printed in the Gettysburg Times Public Notice is not USER Friendly. This almost eliminates any public comment because many residents in the county are not comfortable with this limited access method. In fact, it marginalizes 55 plus residents who are not digital natives. Even the digital natives would have difficulty typing in the link to access the Zoom meeting and Password, etc. The link and codes listed are ridiculous. Even the phone call method is hard for people who are not comfortable with this method. Although it is a challenge, citizens must have access to government that is less complicated. Citizens understand how the Pandemic restrictions impact government meetings. However, it is imperative to simplify the process.

Recommendations: • Create a video for the Townships and the Boroughs to post on their websites and Facebook pages to explain to the citizens how they can participate. • Insist on less complicated links • Use Community Media to video tape your meetings • Livestream video of meeting on the Adams County Facebook page, or YouTube Channel (needs to be more than audio) • Archive them on the ACTPO section of the Adams County website • Post Agenda and Documents associated with meeting’s agenda on the ACTPO Section of the county’s website in a timely manner for citizens to review • Implement the use of emerging technologies and tools to improve efficiency • Invite the Gettysburg Times to your meetings or send a press release to them

Finally, Adams County citizens look forward to greater transparency and access. The Zoom link provided in the Public Notice in the Gettysburg Times is unbelievably complicated. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

A popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy; or, perhaps both. - James Madison, 1832

Respectfully, Ellen Ryan Conewago Township, Adams County Resident

CC: Sherri Clayton-Williams, Director Office of Planning and Development Email: [email protected]