Parish and Town Council Election Results In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Local Government Boundary Commision for England Electoral Review of South Norfolk
SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SOUTH NORFOLK E Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of South Norfolk March 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 OLD COSTESSEY COSTESSEY CP EASTON CP D C This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestry's Stationary Office @ Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil preceedings. NEW COSTESSEY The Local Governement Boundary Commision for England GD100049926 2017. B Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information MARLINGFORD AND COLTON CP applied as part of this review. BAWBURGH CP BRANDON PARVA, COSTON, A RUNHALL AND WELBORNE CP EASTON BARNHAM BROOM CP BARFORD CP COLNEY CP HETHERSETT TROWSE WITH LITTLE MELTON CP NEWTON CP SURLINGHAM CP GREAT MELTON CP KIRBY BEDON CP CRINGLEFORD WRAMPLINGHAM CP CRINGLEFORD CP KIMBERLEY CP HETHERSETT CP BIXLEY CP WICKLEWOOD BRAMERTON CP ROCKLAND ST MARY CP KESWICK AND INTWOOD CP PORINGLAND, ROCKLAND FRAMINGHAM FRAMINGHAMS & TROWSE PIGOT CP H CAISTOR ST EDMUND CP H CLAXTON CP NORTH WYMONDHAM P O P C L C M V A E H R R C S E G T IN P O T ER SWARDESTON CP N HELLINGTON E T FRAMINGHAM YELVERTON P T CP KE EARL CP CP T S N O T E G EAST CARLETON CP L WICKLEWOOD CP F STOKE HOLY CROSS CP ASHBY ST MARY CP R A C ALPINGTON CP HINGHAM CP PORINGLAND CP LANGLEY WITH HARDLEY CP HINGHAM & DEOPHAM CENTRAL -
Parish Share Report
PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST. -
Keswick and Intwood Parish Council Meeting on 25 November 2009
Keswick and Intwood Parish Council Meeting on 25th November 2009. Minutes of the meeting held at The Reading Rooms, Keswick at 19.00. Present: Alan Gelder (AG); Joe Loades (JL); Kevin Hanner (KH); Ruth Ripman (RR); Hayley Spouge (HS) and Phillip Brooks (PB) (Clerk). Also Present: Oliver Butcher (PCSO); Tim Philpott (PCSO); and members of the public: Marguerite Russell (MR) and Olive Dick (OD). Apologies were received from: Christopher Kemp (Councillor Cringleford Ward) (CK); Garry Wheatley (Councillor Cringleford Ward) (GW) and Daniel Cox (Norfolk County Councillor) (DC). 1. To consider apologies for absence: Resolved to accept apologies from Lars Tibell (LT) and Diana Bulman (DB) both unavoidable away from Norwich. AG said that DB had informed him that she would be resigning from the Council because of the amount of time she was now spending away from Norwich. Kevin Hanner was co-opted as a member of the Parish Council. PB reminded the Council that this was the last declared meeting before AG resigned his position as Councillor and Chairman in the New Year. RR said she was willing to assume the position on AG’s resignation. 2. To receive declaration of interests in items on the Agenda: No interests were declared. 3. Public Participation. It was resolved to adjourn the meeting for public participation: MR said she was concerned about the track and path through Big Wood which had been blocked to walkers by gates installed by the landowner. They were regularly used for leisure walking (OD indicated there had been contact with the Ramblers Association in this regard) but they were also functional in providing a safe route on foot between Keswick New Hall and Low Road. -
Minutes 08-03-12
DRAFT Keswick and Intwood Annual Parish Meeting 12th March 2008. Minutes of the meeting held at The Reading Rooms, Keswick at 19.00. Present: Alan Gelder (AG): John Morrison (JM) Linda Thursby (LTh); Phillip Brooks (Clerk) Also Present: Geoff Rivers (Chief Executive, South Norfolk Council) (GR); Mike Grayley (Quality Project Officer NCAPTC) (MG); Derek Clarke (Southwatch Co- ordinator) (DC); Peter Riches (Gurney Estate Liaison Officer) (GELO) (PR); Judith Virgo (Norfolk County Councillor) JV; Christopher Kemp (Councillor Cringleford Ward) (CK); Garry Wheatley (Councillor Cringleford Ward) (GW); Margit Beavon (MB); and Diana Bulman (DB). Apologies received: Joe Loades; Lars Tibell; John Payne. 1. Items notified for discussion by local government electors registered in the parish of Keswick and Intwood. No items were notified for discussion. 2. Questions arising from Publication of the Parish Plan (copies of which were available at the meeting). There were no questions. AG invited everyone to stay for the Parish Council meeting which followed the Annual Parish meeting when latest developments in relation to the Plan would be discussed. 3. Future Plans and Arrangements for the Reading Room. AG summarised the work which was underway to make the Reading Room a more attractive focal point for the community. In particular he said that the kitchen had been refurbished using a grant from the Awards for All Scheme (part of the Big Lottery Fund); and other work and facilities were being obtained with the aid of a grant from the Geoffrey Watling Trust. Currently the outside areas were being renovated and improved with the help of (free) labour provided by the Norfolk Probation Service; and in the longer term it was planned to undertake major roof repairs, demolition of the chimney and an extended car park using (hopefully) a further grant from the Geoffrey Watling trust. -
05 July 2016
2126 Hingham Town Council MINUTES of the Town Council meeting held on Tuesday 05 July 2016. Present Councillors Mr Eldridge – Chairman Mrs Dore – Vice Chairman Mr Bendle, Mrs Chan, Mr Stickland, Mrs Maltby, and Miss Lys There were 7 members of the public present. 1. Apologies for absence – received from Mrs Riley, Miss Thomas and Mr Shingfield 2. Guest Speaker – Steve Beckett - South Norfolk Council – proposed revisions to the conservation area boundary Mr Beckett was welcomed to the meeting and outlined the draft proposals for re aligning the conservation area in Hingham, which will have the effect of removing some of the modern housing from the area (for example Lonsdale Crescent and Rectory Gardens). It was asked as to whether any of the trees falling within these areas are protected by TPO’s (as, if not, once they are no longer within a conservation area, they would not be subject to the protection currently applied). 3. Public participation session Concerns were raised regarding the overgrown state of the public footpaths between Norwich Road and Seamere Road and Norwich Road and Hardingham Road. It was also mentioned that the “no cycling, no horses” sign on Norwich Road/Lincoln Avenue footpath is unreadable and the yellow directional sign on Seamere Road (approach to Mill Corner) is obscured by vegetation. Vegetation on Ringers Lane/ Norwich Street and by the School House is also overgrown. (The Clerk to report these the relevant authorities). Concerns were also raised regarding flooding to the lower parts of Hingham in particular Seamere Road, where ditches in private ownership are overgrown, preventing water from flowing away. -
Little Ouse and Waveney Project
Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project May 2006 214980-UA02/01/B - 12th May 2006 Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 13 th Jan J. For January TEN A E. Lunt 2006 Purseglove workshop 24 th May E. Lunt J. B Draft for Comment 2006 Purseglove This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any o ther project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a pur pose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage re sulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report. -
Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham -
County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List Of
County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List of 1471412 It 44 Norfolk Census 1851 Index 6115160 Norfolk Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It 1 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1811-1825 375230 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1825-1839 375231 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1839-1859 375232 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1715-1734 1596461 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1734-1749 1596462 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1770-1774 1596563 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1774-1781 1596564 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1790-1797 1596566 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1798-1803 1596567 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1812-1819 1596597 Norfolk Marriages Parish Registers 1539-1812 496683 It 2 Norfolk Probate Inventories Index 1674-1825 1471414 It 17-20 Norfolk Tax Assessments 1692-1806 1471412 It 30-43 Norfolk Wills V.101 1854-1857 167184 Norfolk Alburgh Parish Register Extracts 1538-1715 894712 It 5 Norfolk Alby Parish Records 1600-1812 1526778 It 15 Norfolk Aldeby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 6 Norfolk Alethorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Arminghall Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Ashby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 7 Norfolk Ashby Parish Register Extracts 1646 894712 It 5 Norfolk Ashwell-Thorpe Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Aslacton Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Baconsthorpe Parish Register Extracts 1676-1770 894712 It 6 Norfolk Bagthorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Bale Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Bale Parish Register Extracts 1538-1716 894712 It 6 Norfolk Barmer Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barney Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barton-Bendish Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It -
Electoral Arrangements Review Committee
ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes of a meeting of the Electoral Arrangements Review Committee of South Norfolk District Council held at South Norfolk House, Long Stratton on 14 August 2018 at 10:30am. Committee Members Present: Councillors: C Kemp (Chairman), C Easton, K Kiddie and T Lewis Apologies: Councillors: J Fuller and L Hornby Substitute Members: Councillors: M Edney for J Fuller and A Thomas for L Hornby Officers in Attendance: The Electoral Services Manager (J Tovee-Galey) and the Electoral Services Officer (N Tullock). 31. MINUTES The minutes of the Electoral Arrangements Review Committee held on 29 November 2017 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. Regarding the changes made to the boundary of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Poringland, Cllr Lewis stated that he was unhappy with the outcome as he felt it would have been more logical for the area around Octagon Farm to have been moved into Framingham Earl rather than Poringland. He advised members that, although he understood that the Committee’s recommendations had been approved by Full Council and formed part of the Order, he regretted that he had not spotted the issue when the Committee had considered its recommendations using the maps provided. Members noted that the Council had recently appointed a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyst so future graphics would Electoral Arrangements Review Committee 14 August 2018 be more detailed. The Electoral Services Manager advised that, for future Community Governance Reviews, it might be advantageous for the Committee to consider the District in several smaller parts. 32. POLLING DISTRI CTS AND POLLING PLACES REVIEW 2018 The Electoral Services Manager presented her report, advising members that, following the amendment of some parish boundaries as a result of the Community Governance Review, it had been necessary to undertake an interim Polling Districts and Polling Places Review to ensure that suitable and convenient polling arrangements were in place for the May 2019 District and Parish Elections. -
Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters .......................................................................................................................................................... -
Owner of the Site 1C. Client / Landowner Details (If Different from Your Login Account)
1b. I am... - Owner of the site 1c. Client / Landowner Details (if different from your login account) 2. Site Details Site location / address and post code. (at the end of this form you will be able to plot the site on a map as part of your submission) Cherry Tree Farm Woodrow lane Great Moulton Norfolk NR15 2HZ Grid reference (if known) 616172,289727 3. Site Ownership 3a. I (or my client)... Is the sole owner of the site 3b. Please provide the name, address and contact details of the site's landowner(s) John Poole Lucinda Poole 4. Current and Historic Land Uses 4a. Current Land Use (Please describe the site’s current land use e.g. agriculture, employment, unused/vacant etc.) Garden 4b. Has the site been previously No developed? 4c. Describe any previous uses of the site. (please provide details of any relevant historic planning applications, including application numbers if known) Garden 5. Proposed Future Uses 5a. Please provide a short description of the development or land use you proposed (if you are proposing a site to be designated as local green space please go directly to question 6) Residential properties, some retail outlets and flats above. 5b. Which of the following use or uses are - Market Housing you proposing? - Affordable Housing - Business and offices 5c. Please provide further details of your proposal, including details on number of houses and proposed floorspace of commercial buildings etc. Proposal for 16 houses, a row of 3 shops units around 500 sq ft each with parking and flats above. 5d. -
Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.