Black Beetle: Lessons from the Past and Options for the Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Beetle: Lessons from the Past and Options for the Future 119 Black beetle: lessons from the past and options for the future N.L. BELL1, R.J. TOWNSEND2, A.J. POpaY1, C.F. MERCER3, and T.A. JACKSON2 1AgResearch, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 2AgResearch, Canterbury Science Centre, Lincoln 3AgResearch, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North [email protected] Abstract North Island, with an earlier report of an occurrence An outbreak of the pasture insect pest black beetle in Canterbury (Brown 1964) presumably a mistaken began in the Waikato and Bay of Plenty in 2007/8 and identity. Beetles were first reported from areas around has persisted. The extent and severity of damage caused Auckland in the late 1930s and by the late 1950s by black beetle during the current outbreak has focused had been observed as far north as Dargaville with its farmer and researcher attention on methods to maintain southern continuous extent being from the base of persistent pasture now and in future outbreaks. This the Awhitu Peninsula to the base of the Coromandel paper reviews previous research in combination with Peninsula with pockets of infestation reported around data from the current outbreak and relates these to the Gisborne area (Todd 1959). By the early 1970s the current pasture management practice. The possibility continuous distribution extended to the northern-most of being able to predict the distribution, occurrence tip of the North Island and southwards to Raglan on the and duration of black beetle outbreaks is explored west coast and across to Tauranga in the east, including while actual and potential means of controlling black a coastal strip to near the tip of East Cape (Esson 1973). beetle are outlined. We conclude that there are methods The occurrence in the Gisborne area was, by then, available to successfully renew pastures in the presence confirmed (Esson 1973). Watson (1979) considered of black beetle but that outbreak situations increase the distribution of black beetle to be confined to areas risks and may limit subsequent pasture persistence. with a mean annual soil surface temperature of 12.8°C There are fewer readily available options to maintain an which, based on current National Institute of Water and existing pasture and more research is urgently needed Atmospheric Research Virtual Climate Station (VCS) to provide these options. data (Tait & Woods 2007), would include a continuous Keywords: Heteronychus arator, paspalum, pasture, coastal strip around East Cape and down to Cape pasture renewal, pest resistance, pest tolerance, ryegrass Kidnappers in the east with a southerly distribution including a strip of the west coast to about Whanganui Introduction (Fig. 1). This indicates that the range has gradually Black beetle (Heteronychus arator (Fabricius)) was extended south over the last 30–40 years, incorporating first observed in New Zealand in the late 1930s (Todd southern parts of Waikato and Bay of Plenty and parts 1959) and has since become an established pest in of inland Hawkes Bay. This places new areas at risk of the northern part of the country. This review aims to significant damage during outbreaks. give background to black beetle research that has been conducted in New Zealand, to identify gaps in Lifecycle and flight behaviour knowledge which would assist in management of The black beetle has a single generation per year (Fig. this pest and to give some indications of the control 2). In warmer areas of the country, spring development methods currently available to land managers in new may be much quicker than shown in Fig. 2 with first- and existing pastures. stage larvae being observed in early October in sandy soil near Dargaville (Esson 1973). Feeding on grass Distribution – worldwide and entry to New Zealand roots close to the soil surface by the third-stage larvae Black beetle was originally described from the Cape from mid-January to March causes severe damage at of Good Hope, South Africa as Scarabaeus arator a time when plants are already under moisture and (Fabricius 1775). It is now known to be distributed temperature stress and inevitably kills plants. throughout southern and eastern Africa (Ethiopia Adult beetles can fly and large massed flights can be to South Africa) and has spread to South America, observed in the autumn of outbreak years, with Watson Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, South (1979) trapping >85,000 beetles in massed flights in Australia, Western Australia and Norfolk Island) and March 1975. Much smaller flights normally occur in New Zealand (CAB International 2000). spring from late September to December, but these In New Zealand, black beetle is confined to the upper are also massed such that most flights occur on few 120 Pasture Persistence – Grassland Research and Practice Series 15: 119-124 (2011) (≤four) evenings per season (Watson 1979). During cm square spade divots approx. 8-cm deep, across each outbreak years, spring flights may be considerably paddock. If the average number of beetles found in the larger than normal (P.D. King quoted in Watson 1979). paddock was above 10/m2 the pasture was considered to Initial autumn flights appear to be triggered by the first be at risk of suffering significant damage the following significant rainfall after adults emerge from pupae, summer. A damaging larval population was defined as with these and subsequent flights occurring when 40–60 larvae/ m2 dependent on a range of abiotic and soil surface temperatures exceed about 17°C at dusk biotic factors such as soil moisture, soil temperature with calm wind conditions (Watson 1979). Density- and host availability (King 1979; King et al. 1982). dependent spring flight migrations prior to oviposition Using pitfall traps to estimate black beetle populations may also occur (King et al. 1981d). Dispersal of the in spring pasture was an unreliable method of assessing beetles during autumn and spring potentially plays a beetle density (King et al. 1980). crucial role in infesting new pastures during outbreak years. Further research is needed to increase our Population levels and modelling understanding of this, particularly as it relates to the use Populations of black beetle undergo periodic outbreaks of endophyte and insecticidal seed coatings to reduce during which severe pasture damage occurs. Population black beetle infestations. modelling work conducted in the early 1980s (King et al. 1981d) attempted to understand what drove Hosts outbreaks and thereby allow prediction of them. That Grasses, including paspalum (Paspalum dilatatum) and work was largely carried out in paspalum-dominated ryegrasses (Lolium spp.), are the preferred hosts of both pastures which were common at that time and produced larval and adult black beetle (King 1976; King et al. more stable beetle populations than the ryegrass 1981c; King et al. 1981e; King et al. 1981f; King et pastures with which they were compared (King et al. al. 1981g; Todd 1959) and these also act as preferred 1981f). The ryegrass cultivars used (e.g., Grasslands oviposition sites (King et al. 1981b). Although black Ruanui (King et al. 1981e)) would most likely have beetle larvae will consume white clover (Trifolium contained standard endophyte (see Endophyte section repens) when given no choice (King et al. 1981g), it for explanation of endophyte strains). Therefore, the appears that legumes are generally unfavourable hosts decline in beetle populations they observed from (King et al. 1981a; Sutherland & Greenfield 1978). February to September in ryegrass plots, leading to the Carrots are suitable food for larvae and adults in the conclusion that ryegrass pastures were suitable habitats laboratory (King, 1981c; pers obs). It appears that soil only over the spring and summer periods (King et al. organic matter may act as a feeding stimulant for larval 1981f), may well have been an effect of the endophyte black beetle (King 1977), which may have implications status of the plants rather than their suitability as a food for the amount of plant damage incurred in peat soils. source per se. By sowing a non-host crop in spring such as From the models developed in the 1980s in brassicas, legumes or chicory it may be possible to paspalum, the critical factors to black beetle population disrupt larval feeding over summer thus breaking the increase were: thermal units above 15°C between 1 black beetle lifecycle and helping to ensure a low September and 30 November; and density-dependent population density is present once pastures are resown variation in natality (King et al. 1981d). The thermal in autumn. A cropping phase would also allow for units calculation for September–November seems to fit control of weedy host grasses such as paspalum and both paspalum and ryegrass data (King et al. 1981d) annual poa (Poa annua). but some of the other key factors in the beetle life cycle were thought to be more important beneath ryegrass Sampling methods for on-farm monitoring than paspalum. High soil moistures, for instance, appear To make timely treatment decisions or to adjust farm to be unfavourable for young larvae (King 1979). King management strategies which compensate for pasture et al. (1981d) noted that their model was preliminary production losses, farmers need a way to predict and needed to be tested with data added from a broader potential future black beetle populations. Watson et range of pasture types. Additionally they noted that adult al. (1980a) showed that it is possible to determine flight dispersal needed to be investigated and the impact whether individual paddocks were at risk of developing this may have on population dynamics incorporated damaging summer populations of black beetle larvae into the model. It is unclear, therefore, how well the by monitoring black beetle adults during the preceding population models developed previously fit with the spring. The monitoring system advocated required current situation and across a wider geographical range. approximately half a person-hour per paddock to assess Although climatic factors are obviously an important beetle numbers from nine representative samples, 20- determinant in black beetle population changes, the Black beetle: lessons from the past and options for the..
Recommended publications
  • Heteronychus Arator
    Heteronychus arator Scientific Name Heteronychus arator (Fabricius) Synonyms: Heteronychus arator australis Endrödi, Heteronychus indenticulatus Endrodi, Heteronychus madagassus Endrodi, Heteronychus sanctaehelenae Blanchard, Heteronychus transvaalensis Peringuey, Scarabaeus arator Fabricius Common Name(s) Black maize beetle, African black beetle, black lawn beetle, black beetle Type of Pest Beetle Figure 1. Illustration of each stage of the life Taxonomic Position cycle of the black maize beetle, showing a close up view of each stage and a Insecta, Coleoptera, Class: Order: background view showing that the eggs, Family: Scarabaeidae larvae, and pupae are all underground stages with the adults being the only stage Reason for Inclusion appearing above ground. Illustration CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List- courtesy of NSW Agriculture. http://www.ricecrc.org/Hort/ascu/zecl/zeck11 2006 – 2009 3.htm Pest Description Life stages are shown in Figures 1 and 2. 1 Eggs: White, oval, and measuring approximately 1.8 mm (approx. /16 in) long at time of oviposition. Eggs grow larger through development and become more 3 round in shape. Eggs are laid singly at a soil depth of 1 to 5 cm (approx. /8 to 2 in). Females each lay between 12 to 20 eggs total. In the field, eggs hatch after approximately 20 days. Larvae can be seen clearly with the naked eye (CABI, 2007; Matthiessen and Learmoth, 2005). Larvae: There are three larval instars. Larvae are creamy-white except for the brown head capsule and hind segments, which appear dark where the contents of the gut show through the body wall. The head capsule is smooth textured, 1 1 measuring 1.5 mm (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !
    ! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<!
    [Show full text]
  • Early Warning System for the Black Maize Beetle (Heteronychus Arator Fabricius) in a Major Maize
    Early warning system for the black maize beetle (Heteronychus arator Fabricius) in a major maize producing region of South Africa by Nicolene de Klerk Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in Entomology Department of Zoology and Entomology Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa 2015 Supervisor: Prof. S.vd M. Louw Co-supervisor: Prof. J.B.J. van Rensburg Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation submitted by me for the degree Magister Scientiae at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and that I have not previously submitted the same work at another University / Faculty. I furthermore concede copyright of the dissertation to the University of the Free State. ……………………………… Nicolene de Klerk 15 May 2015 i Acknowledgements During the course of this study people from various departments and institutions assisted which led to the completion of this study. Appreciation is expressed to all. Financial aid was provided by the ARC (Agricultural Research Council) and the Maize Trust. Assistance by ARC staff included Mabel du Toit and Mischack Moroladi. Special thanks to Dr. T.W. Drinkwater. Weather data were obtained from SA (South African) weather services as well as from ARC-ISCW (Agricultural Research Council – Institute for Soil, Climate and Water). Statistical support was provided by Nicolene Thiebaut, Frikkie Calitz and Wiltrud Durand. Thanks to all 99 maize producers that assisted with capturing the insect populations over the years. To my husband, Adriaan and my children, Angelene, Lee-Ann, Niané, Lichané and Adriaan thank you all for supporting me in the many struggles that faced us throughout the journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografi 2003 Proquest
    BIBLIOGRAFI 2003 PROQUEST Accumulation of fumonisins B1 and B2 in freshly harvested Brazilian commercial maize at three locations during two nonconsecutive seasons/Simone M. Camargos, Lucia M. Valente Soares, Eduardo Sawazaki, Denizart Bolonhezi, Jairo L. Castro, Nelson Bortolleto. Mycopathologia. Dordrecht:May 2003. Vol. 155, Iss. 4, p. 219-228 Best types of maize hybrids for the Western High Plains of the USA/F R Guillen-Portal, W K Russell, D D Baltensperger, K M Eskridge, et al. Crop Science. Madison:Nov/Dec 2003. Vol. 43, Iss. 6, p. 2065-2070 Canning Gold: Northern New England's Sweet Corn Industry/ Derek Oden. Agricultural History. Berkeley:Fall 2003. Vol. 77, Iss. 4, p. 617-619 Canopy Structure, Light Interception, and Photosynthesis in Maize/D W Stewart, C Costa, L M Dwyer, D L Smith, et al. Agronomy Journal. Madison:Nov/Dec 2003. Vol. 95, Iss. 6, p. 1465-1474 Chaco corn import /Constance Holden. Science. Washington:Oct 24, 2003. Vol. 302, Iss. 5645, p. 561 Characterization of the stimulating effect of low-dose stressors in maize and bean seedlings/Peter Nyitrai, Karoly Boka, Laszlo Gaspar, Eva Sarvari, et al. Journal of Plant Physiology. Stuttgart:Oct 2003. v. 160, Iss. 10, p. 1175-83 Comparing methods for integrating exotic germplasm into European forage maize breeding programs1/Domagoj Simic, Thomas Presterl, Gunter Seitz, Hartwig H Geiger. Crop Science. Madison:Nov/Dec 2003. Vol. 43, Iss. 6, p. 1952-1959 Bibliografi Hasil Penelitian Pertanian : Komoditas Jagung 1 Comparison of Broiler Performance When Fed Diets Containing Grain from Yield Gard1 Rootworm (MON863), YieldGard Plus (MON810 W MON863), Nontransgenic Control, or Commercial Reference Corn Hybrids/M L Taylor, Y Hyun, G F Hartnell, S G Riordan, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteronychus Arator (Fabricius)
    Black Maize Beetle Screening Aid Heteronychus arator (Fabricius) Hanna R. Royals1, Todd M. Gilligan1 and Charles F. Brodel2 1) Identification Technology Program (ITP) / Colorado State University, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology (S&T), 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 U.S.A. (Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]) 2) USDA-APHIS-PPQ, Miami Inspection Station, 6302 NW 36th St, Miami, FL 33122 U.S.A. (Email: [email protected]) Version 1.0 This CAPS (Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey) screening aid produced for and distributed by: 21 February USDA-APHIS-PPQ National Identification Services (NIS) 2017 This and other identification resources are available at: http://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/taxonomic_services The black maize beetle, Heteronychus arator (F.), is a scarab beetle native to Africa and introduced into Australia, New Zealand, and Central and South America. This scarab is a member of the subfamily Dynastinae, the rhinoceros beetles. Adults are characterized by robust body shapes, exposed pygidia, dark coloration, and mandibles that are generally visible from the dorsal aspect. Damage to agricultural crops occurs mostly due to adults feeding on stems and plant bases, particularly those of seedlings, resulting in plant death. African black beetles have been recorded feeding on Ananas comosus (pineapple), Eucalyptus, Solanum tuberosum (potato), Vitis vinifera Fig. 1: Lateral view of Heteronychus arator (grapevine), and seem to have a preference for a large number (Photo by Hanna Royals). of plants in the Poaceae such as: Bromus catharticus (prairie grass), Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass), Pennisetum clandestinum (kikuyu grass), Saccharum officinarum (sugar cane), and Zea mays (maize).
    [Show full text]
  • Erenoğlu Danişmanlik Tercümanlik Ve Diş Ticaret
    ANNEX –1 HARMFUL ORGANISMS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO QUARANTINE AND THAT HINDER IMPORTATION A-HARMFUL ORGANISMS NOT KNOWN TO OCCUR IN TURKEY, THAT ARE SUBJECT TO QUARANTINE AND THAT HINDER IMPORTATION Insects Acleris gloverana Acleris variana Aeolesthes sarta Agrilus auroguttatus Agrilus anxius Agrilus planipennis Aleurolobus marlatti Amauromyza maculosa Anastrepha fraterculus Anastrepha ludens Anastrepha obliqua Anastrepha suspensa Anoplophora glabripennis Anoplophora malasiaca Anthonomus bisignifer Anthonomus eugenii Anthonomus grandis Anthonomus quadrigibbus Anthonomus signatus Apriona cinerea Apriona germari Apriona japonica Aromia bungii Arrhenodes minutus 11Bactericera cockerelli Bactrocera ciliatus Bactrocera cucumis Bactrocera cucurbitae Bactrocera latifrons Bactrocera minax Bactrocera dorsalis Bactrocera tryoni Bactrocera tsuneonis Bactrocera zonatus Blitopertha orientalis Cacyreus marshalli 1Carneocephala fulgida Ceratitis rosa Choristoneura spp. Conotrachelus nenuphar Cydia inopinata Cydia packardi 1 Dendroctonus adjunctus Dendroctonus brevicomis Dendroctonus frontalis Dendroctonus ponderosae Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Dendroctonus rufipennis Dendrolimus sibiricus Diabrotica balteata Diabrotica barberi Diabrotica speciosa Diabrotica trivittata Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Diabrotica undecimpunctata undecimpunctata Diabrotica virgifera zeae 2Diaphorina citri Diabrotica virgifera 2Diaphorina citri Diaprepes abbreviatus 1Draeculacephala minerva Drosophila suzukii Dryocoetes confusus Epichoristodes acerbella Epitrix cucumeris Epitrix
    [Show full text]
  • African Black Beetle
    Biosecurity fact sheet October 2010 African Black Beetle (Heteronychus arator) Important note African black beetle is a List A pest under the Tasmanian Plant Quarantine Act 1997. If you think you have seen it, please report to DPIPWE on 1300 368 550 There are two species of cockchafer present in Tasmania that, at the adult stage, look similar to, and can be easily confused with, African black beetle. If you see what you think are cockchafers, please use this fact sheet to ensure they are not African black beetle (see overleaf). If in doubt, please contact us. Background The first Australian records of African black beetle are from Wyong NSW in the 1920s (Australian Plant Pest Database, 2010). It is now present in Victoria, NSW, South Australia, Queensland and Western Australia but has not been recorded in Tasmania. Why it is a pest African black beetle can cause significant economic damage to horticultural crops – in particular potatoes, vines, olives and various vegetables. It can be a significant pest in newly-sown pasture and lawns. It can also affect some ornamental tree and shrub species. Host plants It has many host plants but pasture or amenity grasses are the preferred hosts and potato (Solanum tuberosum) is the most important crop host. Other hosts include: Grains such as maize Grapevine Fruit such as pineapple and strawberry Vegetables such as turnip, cabbage, cauliflower, cucurbits, carrot, lettuce, pea, tomato, rhubarb Many ornamentals, eg begonia, calendula, petunia. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment DPIPWE biosecurity fact sheet – African black beetle Identification of larvae or grubs C shaped Fully grown larvae or grubs are approximately 25 mm long Feed below soil surface Brown/tan head capsule.
    [Show full text]
  • Virus and Virus-Like Particles Found in Southern Pine Beetle Adults in Mississippi and Georgia Contents
    Virus and Virus-Like Particles Found in Southern Pine Beetle Adults in Mississippi and Georgia P.P. Sikorowski A.M. Lawrence Professor, Entomology Senior Research Assistant, Entomology Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Mississippi State University Mississippi State University T.E. Nebeker T.S. Price Professor, Entomology Forest Entomologist Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Georgia Forestry Commission Mississippi State University Macon, Georgia Published by the Office of Agricultural Communications (Publications), Division of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University. Edited by Keith H. Remy, Senior Publications Editor. Cover designed by George Taylor, Chief Illustrator. Contents Introduction Insect Viruses Materials and Methods Results Family Picornaviridae Family Bunyaviridae Family Baculoviridae -- Nonoccluded Group Infectious Flacherie Virus (IFV) Unknown (recently found) RNA Virus Discussion References Cited Introduction The Southern Pine Beetle (SPB), Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), is the most destructive insect pest of pine forests in the southeastern United States and in parts of Mexico and Central America (Payne, 1980). It usually is endemic, but appears periodically in epidemic outbreaks (Blackman, 1949). During 1995, it was estimated that in Mississippi more than $15 million in timber was lost to the SPB (Nebeker, unpublished), and losses in South Carolina were estimated at more than $100 million (Mike Remion, personal communication). From 1960-1990, U.S. timber losses to the SPB have been estimated at $901.8 million (Price et al., 1990). Current methods of minimizing SPB losses, according to Lorio (1980), include these: (1) salvage, (2) cut and leave, (3) fell and spray with insecticides, or (4) pile and burn.
    [Show full text]
  • Logs and Chips of Eighteen Eucalypt Species from Australia
    United States Department of Agriculture Pest Risk Assessment Forest Service of the Importation Into Forest Products Laboratory the United States of General Technical Report Unprocessed Logs and FPL−GTR−137 Chips of Eighteen Eucalypt Species From Australia P. (=Tryphocaria) solida, P. tricuspis; Scolecobrotus westwoodi; Abstract Tessaromma undatum; Zygocera canosa], ghost moths and carpen- The unmitigated pest risk potential for the importation of unproc- terworms [Abantiades latipennis; Aenetus eximius, A. ligniveren, essed logs and chips of 18 species of eucalypts (Eucalyptus amyg- A. paradiseus; Zelotypia stacyi; Endoxyla cinereus (=Xyleutes dalina, E. cloeziana, E. delegatensis, E. diversicolor, E. dunnii, boisduvali), Endoxyla spp. (=Xyleutes spp.)], true powderpost E. globulus, E. grandis, E. nitens, E. obliqua, E. ovata, E. pilularis, beetles (Lyctus brunneus, L. costatus, L. discedens, L. parallelocol- E. regnans, E. saligna, E. sieberi, E. viminalis, Corymbia calo- lis; Minthea rugicollis), false powderpost or auger beetles (Bo- phylla, C. citriodora, and C. maculata) from Australia into the strychopsis jesuita; Mesoxylion collaris; Sinoxylon anale; Xylion United States was assessed by estimating the likelihood and conse- cylindricus; Xylobosca bispinosa; Xylodeleis obsipa, Xylopsocus quences of introduction of representative insects and pathogens of gibbicollis; Xylothrips religiosus; Xylotillus lindi), dampwood concern. Twenty-two individual pest risk assessments were pre- termite (Porotermes adamsoni), giant termite (Mastotermes dar- pared, fifteen dealing with insects and seven with pathogens. The winiensis), drywood termites (Neotermes insularis; Kalotermes selected organisms were representative examples of insects and rufinotum, K. banksiae; Ceratokalotermes spoliator; Glyptotermes pathogens found on foliage, on the bark, in the bark, and in the tuberculatus; Bifiditermes condonensis; Cryptotermes primus, wood of eucalypts. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Carilla 1 Del Tríptico
    1 1 thISBGMO Buenos Aires I ARGENTINA 2010 11th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms The role of Biosafety Research in the decision-making process Organized by the International Society for Biosafety Research {ISBR) Monday 15 November - Saturday 20 November Centro Cultural Borges Viamorte 525- Galerias Pacifico - Buenos Aires Argentina ISBR international, Society far Biosafety Research 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 3.- Sponsors Organisers ISBR International Society for Biosafety Research Ministerio de ArgenBio Agricuttura, Ganaderia y Pesca Consejo Argenhino pare la Ingot r Presidencia de la Nacion v cl De...orro llo de la Bintecno /1C4 ILSI IMMO INTA 1.11111 Iniie erSnaiheoneasl INSUIFD TITn FAUBA Sponsors F O N C Y T 200 ANOS Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia BICENTENARIO e Innovation Productive 7,) ARGENTINO Presidencia de la Nacian AGENCIA Fesoluckin N' 308/10 11: Conselho de Agro )Crop Life sobra BriO 5 I NTE RIVATI 1,1 NAL_ J) s Bioteenelogia a CI Center for ASA Environmental A.S0631.i, SenWIerosArgOnhoos Risk Assessment 2 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 3.- Contents Organising Committees Welcome Address Key note Speaker and Chair Biographies Information about Argentina and Buenos Aires Venue Social events Programme Oral Presentations Poster Sessions and Abstracts 3.1 Organising Committees Symposium Committee Jeremy Sweet (Chairman) UK Patrick Rudelsheim (Project Manager) Belgium Moises Burachik
    [Show full text]
  • Heteronychus Arator (Fabricius, 1775)
    Fact Sheet Heteronychus arator (Fabricius, 1775) Taxonomy Sub family: Dynastinae / Tribe: Pentodontini / Genus: Heteronychus Distinguishing Features Small ovate beetles, body length 12-15mm. Body colour black to dark reddish brown. Head Heteronychus arator dorsal view lacking carina and tubercles. Clypeus truncated with distinct lateral margins, and dentate Photographer: with a median denticle. Mandibles visible dorsally with 2-3 teeth present on the outer edge. Pia Scanlon Antennae 10 segmented, with a 3 segmented club. Mentum with a rounded apex. Ocular canthus glabrous. Pronotum smooth, convex, lacking punctures. Elytra with rows of shallow striae. Apex of metatibia truncate. Propygidium with a pair of stridulatory bands. Tarsal claws simple. Related and Similar Species Heteronychus arator lateral view Photographer: Heteronychus arator is a member of the tribe Pentodontini which share the following Pia Scanlon characteristics: Sexual dimorphism usually not well pronounced. Mentum not broad, and not covering basal joint of palpi. Legs shorter and stouter than those of Cyclocephalini. Anterior tibia of males not longer than females. Apex of metatibia truncated, straight, with bristles present. Elytra more or less convex, usually with double rows. Propygidium with or without stridulatory area. Heteronychus arator ventral view An updated key to the Australian genera of Pentodontini is provided by Weir et.al. (2019). Photographer: The shape of the clypeus (truncate, dentate), smooth pronotum and the presence of Pia Scanlon stridulatory bands
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F. List of Citations Accepted by ECOTOX Criteria and Database
    Appendix F. List of citations accepted by ECOTOX criteria and Database The citations in Appendices F and G were considered for inclusion in ECOTOX. Citations include the ECOTOX Reference number, as well as rejection codes (if relevant). The query was run in October, 1999 and revised March and June, 2000. References in Section F.1 include chlorpyrifos papers accepted by both ECOTOX and OPP and cited within this risk assessment. Sections F.2 through F.4. include the full list of chlorpyrifos papers from the 2007, 2008 and 2009 ECOTOX runs that were accepted by ECOTOX and OPP whether or not cited within the risk assessment and the full list of papers accepted by ECOTOX but not by OPP. ECOTOX Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes: Papers must meet minimum criteria for inclusion in the ECOTOX database as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Each study must contain all of the following: • toxic effects from a single chemical exposure; • toxic effects on an aquatic or terrestrial plant or animal species; • biological effects on live, whole organisms; • concurrent environmental chemical concentrations/doses or application rates; and • explicit duration of exposure. Appendix G includes the list of citations excluded by ECOTOX and the list of exclusion terms and descriptions. For chlorpyrifos, hundreds of references were not accepted by ECOTOX for one or more reasons. OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX should also meet OPP criterion for use in a risk assessment (Section F.1).
    [Show full text]