DOCSLIB.ORG

Influencing Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | FALL 2016 Facebook Confronts Questions, Criticisms over News Distribution, Censorship, and “Fake News” Influencing Election uring the autumn of 2016, social media giant individuals would remain involved in the Trending section Facebook was the target of significant criticism of the site, but their roles would be reduced to ensuring that for its role as a distributor of news to the public. the algorithm was working properly. In August 2016, Facebook replaced its human Quartz reported that Facebook’s decision to rely upon an editors who curated the site’s “Trending” topics algorithm rather than human editors to choose topics came Dsection, a feature that provides users with topics and news after the social media site faced criticisms over political bias. that are currently popular on Facebook, with an algorithm In May, Gizmodo reported that Facebook’s human editors that would determine which topics should be featured. had regularly sought to suppress news topics that might be However, shortly after Facebook deployed the algorithm, of interest to conservatives. Although it denied the reports, a fake news story was promoted in the Trending stories Facebook faced significant criticisms in conservative news section, prompting significant criticism. Facebook faced circles, and the news prompted Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), more controversy in September after it removed a Pulitzer the chairman of the Senate’s Commerce, Science, and Prize-winning Vietnam war photograph from a Norwegian Transportation Committee, to send a letter to Facebook newspaper’s page. In November, Facebook again found itself CEO Mark Zuckerberg asking him to explain whether the in crosshairs as critics accused the social media company company had sought to suppress conservative viewpoints. of failing to filter out fake news during the tumultuous 2016 Press advocates pushed back against Republicans, noting Presidential election season. that the First Amendment allows private companies to Observers of the news industry have suggested that these choose what types of content they publish. types of controversies are important because social media In its August 26 blog post, Facebook said that it has become an increasingly import source from which investigated the bias claims but found no evidence that Americans obtain news. In May 2016, the Pew Research it actually existed. Nevertheless, the social media site Center released the results of a survey indicating that 62 maintained that the switch to an algorithm was still percent of U.S. adults get news from social media, and 44 necessary. “[M]aking these changes to the product allows percent of those surveyed indicated that they specifically our team to make fewer individual decisions about topics,” used Facebook to get news. As a result, critics have argued the company wrote. “Facebook is a platform for all ideas, that Facebook is becoming a key news information source and we’re committed to maintaining Trending as a way for for much of the American public and urged the social media people to access a breadth of ideas and commentary about a site to take greater responsibility in its role as a distributor variety of topics.” of news. On August 29, The Atlantic reported that Facebook found itself at the center of controversy when the Trending Facebook “Trending” Topics Promotes Fake News section featured a topic titled “Megyn Kelly.” The topic itself after Human Editors Laid Off featured a fake news story by a website Ending the Fed On Aug. 26, 2016, Quartz reported that Facebook had that claimed that Megyn Kelly had been fired by Fox News fired its team of human editors who curated and wrote after she endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary descriptions for its “Trending” topics section on the social Clinton. In reality, Fox News had not fired Kelly nor had she media site. In an August 26 post on its “Newsroom” blog, endorsed any presidential candidate. The Atlantic reported Facebook announced that it would use an algorithm that despite the news being false, more than 200,000 people to populate the Trending topics section of the site. The had liked posts on Facebook related to the fake story algorithm would choose the various topics based on the following the website’s promotion of the story through the number of Facebook users’ original posts, mentions, and Trending section algorithm. The story was featured in the shares of the particular subject. Facebook noted that human Facebook, continued on page 3 Inside This Issue Fall 2016: Volume 22, No. 1 1 Facebook Confronts Questions, Criticisms over News 23 Advocates Criticize Law Enforcement Officials’ Deceptive Distribution, Censorship, and “Fake News” Influencing Activities Involving the Press Election Law Enforcement Conflicts Cover Story 25 U.S. Government Ends Formal Oversight of Key Internet 9 Restrictions on “Ballot Selfies” Raise First Amendment Infrastructure Functions Amidst Censorship Concerns Issues During 2016 Election Internet Technology First Amendment 27 Rolling Stone Found Liable for Defaming Dean in Now- 12 President Barack Obama Leaves Mixed Legacy on Retracted Campus Rape Story Government Transparency Defamation Press Freedom 30 Gawker and Hogan Reach $31 Million Settlement in Invasion of Privacy Suit 17 United States Supreme Court Set to Hear Oral Arguments on “Disparaging” Trademarks Invasion of Privacy Supreme Court News 33 State Courts Consider Reporter’s Privilege Issues Reporter’s Privilege 18 American Bar Association Expresses Concerns over Publishing Report Calling Donald Trump a “Libel Bully” 37 Independent Journalists Face Threats to Newsgathering Libel Rights Newsgathering 20 Congress Adopts Law Protecting Online Consumer Reviews Online Speech 40 Media Law Issues at the Forefront in Several States State Law Updates 22 The Daily Beast Pulls Article Effectively Outing Olympic Athletes 45 31st Annual Silha Lecture Examines Freedom of Expression and Racial Justice Tensions on College Campuses Media Ethics Silha Center Events SILHA CENTER STAFF JANE E. KIRTLEY SILHA CENTER DIRECTOR AND SILHA PROFESSOR OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW CASEY CARMODY SILHA BULLETIN EDITOR SCOTT MEMMEL SILHA RESEARCH ASSISTANT RONALD WACLAWSKI SILHA RESEARCH ASSISTANT ELAINE HARGROVE SILHA CENTER STAFF 2 Facebook, continued from page 1 and then offer a “related fact check” link to such websites Trending section for approximately eight hours, according to underneath posts that contain dubious news. However, The Atlantic. Mantzarlis was unsure whether Facebook would be willing The promotion of a fake news story three days after its to entertain the idea of hiring fact checkers. decision to terminate human editors was embarrassing for “Is Facebook game? [At an August 29 appearance at Luiss Facebook. CBS News reported on August 29 that the gaffe University in Rome], Zuckerberg repeated that he did not prompted Facebook Vice President of Global Operations want Facebook to become a media organization,” Mantzarlis Justin Osofsky to release a statement apologizing and wrote. “Regardless of whether that ship has sailed or explaining why such a story was promoted in the Trending not, hiring fact-checkers does not have to compromise topics section. “This was a mistake for which we apologize, his vision. It would, in fact, reinforce Facebook’s stated and it has been corrected,” Osofsky said in the statement. ‘News Feed Values,’ which say the network’s experience “We also want to share a bit more context on how it should be ‘informative.’ And it would represent a private happened. A topic is eligible for Trending if it meets the criteria for being a real-world news event and there are a “The algorithm gets smart enough that, sufficient number of relevant articles and posts about that topic. Over the weekend, this topic met those conditions and even if the casino isn’t looking to put a the Trending review team accepted it thumb on the scale, thumbs will appear. thinking it was a real-world topic. We This isn’t just Facebook’s problem — this COVER STORY then re-reviewed the topic based on the likelihood that there were inaccuracies is one of the profound problems of our in the articles. We determined it was time.” a hoax and it is no longer being shown in Trending. We’re working to make our detection of hoax and satirical stories — Jonathan Zittrain, quicker and more accurate.” Harvard Law School professor Despite the apology, critics argued that Facebook’s decision to use algorithms, rather than humans, to determine which news stories were important could create serious company responding to concerns from its users about the problems for the presentation of news on its site. In an trustworthiness of the information available on the network. August 30 interview with The Atlantic, Harvard Law School Most importantly, it would have the added benefit of helping Professor Jonathan Zittrain argued that allowing algorithms reduce misinformation.” to determine what news stories were trending was like a game of roulette. “Even the casino isn’t supposed to know Facebook Faces Criticism After Censoring “Napalm what number is going to win when it spins. And so, if Girl” Photograph there’s some issue, at least it isn’t intentional manipulation On Sept. 9, 2016, The Guardian reported that Facebook by Facebook,” Zittrain said. However, Zittrain noted that faced new criticisms when Norway’s largest newspaper problems could arise when programmers design algorithms published a front-page open letter addressed to Facebook
Recommended publications
  • Broadcasting Ii Aug 5

    Broadcasting Ii Aug 5

    The Fifth Estate R A D I O T E L E V I S I O N C A B L E S A T E L L I T E Broadcasting ii Aug 5 WE'RE PROUD TO BE VOTED THE TWIN CITIES' #1 MUSIC STATION FOR 7 YEARS IN A ROW.* And now, VIKINGS Football! Exciting play -by-play with Joe McConnell and Stu Voigt, plus Bud Grant 4 times a week. Buy a network of 55 stations. Contact Tim Monahan at 612/642 -4141 or Christal Radio for details AIWAYS 95 AND SUNNY.° 'Art:ron 1Y+ Metro Shares 6A/12M, Mon /Sun, 1979-1985 K57P-FM, A SUBSIDIARY OF HUBBARD BROADCASTING. INC. I984 SUhT OGlf ZZ T s S-lnd st-'/AON )IMM 49£21 Z IT 9.c_. I Have a Dream ... Dr. Martin Luther KingJr On January 15, 1986 Dr. King's birthday becomes a National Holiday KING... MONTGOMERY For more information contact: LEGACY OF A DREAM a Fox /Lorber Representative hour) MEMPHIS (Two Hours) (One-half TO Written produced and directed Produced by Ely Landau and Kaplan. First Richard Kaplan. Nominated for MFOXILORBER by Richrd at the Americ Film Festival. Narrated Academy Award. Introduced by by Jones. Harry Belafonte. JamcsEarl "Perhaps the most important film FOX /LORBER Associates, Inc. "This is a powerful film, a stirring documentary ever made" 432 Park Avenue South film. se who view it cannot Philadelphia Bulletin New York, N.Y. 10016 fail to be moved." Film News Telephone: (212) 686 -6777 Presented by The Dr.Martin Luther KingJr.Foundation in association with Richard Kaplan Productions.
  • The Politics of Social Media. Facebook Control and Resistance

    The Politics of Social Media. Facebook Control and Resistance

    The Politics of Social Media Facebook: Control and Resistance Master thesis Name: Marc Stumpel Student number: 5850002 Email: [email protected] Date: August 16, 2010 Supervisor: Dr Thomas Poell Second reader: Dr Geert Lovink Institution: University of Amsterdam Department: Media Studies (New Media) Keywords Facebook, Network-making power, Counterpower, Framing, Protocol, Tactical Media, Exploitation, Open-source, Agonistic Pluralism, Neodemocracy Abstract This thesis examines the governance of contemporary social media and the potential of resistance. In particular, it sheds light on several cases in which Facebook has met with resistance in its attempt to exercise control. This social networking site has raised concerns over privacy, the constraints of its software, and the exploitation of user-generated content. By critically analyzing the confrontations over these issues, this thesis aims to provide a framework for thinking about an emerging political field. This thesis argues that discursive processes and (counter)protocological implementations should be regarded as essential political factors in governing the user activities and conditions on large social networking sites. A discourse analysis unveils how Facebook enacts a recurrent pattern of discursive framing and agenda-setting to support the immediate changes it makes to the platform. It shows how contestation leads to the reconfiguration and retraction of certain software implementations. Furthermore, a software study analyzes how the users are affected by Facebook‘s reconfiguration of protocological assemblages. Several tactical media projects are examined in order to demonstrate the mutability of platform‘s software. 2 Foreword My inspiration for this thesis came largely from the thought-provoking discussions in the New Media and the Transformation of Politics course.
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware Karen Sbriglio, Firemen’S ) Retirement System of St

    In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware Karen Sbriglio, Firemen’S ) Retirement System of St

    EFiled: Aug 06 2021 03:34PM EDT Transaction ID 66784692 Case No. 2018-0307-JRS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KAREN SBRIGLIO, FIREMEN’S ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. ) LOUIS, CALIFORNIA STATE ) TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ) CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL ) BUILDING LABORERS’ LOCAL NO. ) 79 GENERAL FUND, CITY OF ) BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND ) RELIEF SYSTEM, and LIDIA LEVY, derivatively on behalf of Nominal ) C.A. No. 2018-0307-JRS Defendant FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) PUBLIC INSPECTION VERSION ) FILED AUGUST 6, 2021 v. ) ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL SANDBERG, PEGGY ALFORD, ) ) MARC ANDREESSEN, KENNETH CHENAULT, PETER THIEL, JEFFREY ) ZIENTS, ERSKINE BOWLES, SUSAN ) DESMOND-HELLMANN, REED ) HASTINGS, JAN KOUM, ) KONSTANTINOS PAPAMILTIADIS, ) DAVID FISCHER, MICHAEL ) SCHROEPFER, and DAVID WEHNER ) ) Defendants, ) -and- ) ) FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) I. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION...................................................................... 5 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ....................................................................19 III. PARTIES .......................................................................................................20 A. Plaintiffs ..............................................................................................20 B. Director Defendants ............................................................................26 C. Officer Defendants ..............................................................................28
  • Facebook, Social Media Privacy, and the Use and Abuse of Data

    Facebook, Social Media Privacy, and the Use and Abuse of Data

    S. HRG. 115–683 FACEBOOK, SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY, AND THE USE AND ABUSE OF DATA JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE AND THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 10, 2018 Serial No. J–115–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:24 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 S:\GPO\DOCS\37801.TXT JACKIE FACEBOOK, SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY, AND THE USE AND ABUSE OF DATA VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:24 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 S:\GPO\DOCS\37801.TXT JACKIE S. HRG. 115–683 FACEBOOK, SOCIAL MEDIA PRIVACY, AND THE USE AND ABUSE OF DATA JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE AND THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 10, 2018 Serial No. J–115–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 37–801 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:24 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\37801.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JOHN THUNE, South Dakota, Chairman ROGER WICKER, Mississippi BILL NELSON, Florida, Ranking ROY BLUNT, Missouri MARIA
  • Chitwood Family

    Chitwood Family

    Early Family History and Background Chitwood Family (and related lines) Jean (Cragun) Tombaugh TOMBAUGH HOUSE 700 Pontiac Street Rochester, Indiana 46975 Early Family History and Background Copyright © 1965 Jean (Cragun) Tombaugh First Printing (by mimeograph) 1965 Wendell C. Tombaugh Second Printing (by offset press) 1976 Tombaugh Publishing House Third Printing (by copier) 1981 Tombaugh Publishing House Fourth Printing (by IBM computer) 1989 TOMBAUGH HOUSE Fifth Printing (by Macintosh computer) 1992 TOMBAUGH HOUSE Passages from Shakespeare of London by Marchette Chute, copyright, 1949, by E. P. Dutton & co., Inc., reprinted by permission of the publishers. Also see Acknowledgments. Early Family History and Background PREFACE The purpose of this book is to preserve family history and to perpetuate pride in the accomplishments of our pioneer ancestors. It is understandable that the contents of Chapter One may be tiresome reading to some. However, it was included for the benefit of those who might want to go more thoroughly into the background of the family. The old and original spellings - and misspellings - have been used. This book is not intended to be a final story of the Chitwood family of Virginia, but, rather, a first chapter of the story, which we hope will never be ended. It may appear strange that a native of Illinois, born of parents from Kansas, living in Indiana, writes a book about people in Virginia. True, much information is available, if at all, only in Virginia. But, the Indiana State Library, the Fort Wayne (Ind.) Public Library and the National Archives have vast amounts of pertinent information on their shelves, on microfilm and on microcards; and the courteous assistance of their personnel must be remembered.
  • REGULATION’: a PROCESS ONAPROCNOT a TEXT ESSNOTAT Extfacebcreate Working Paper 2020/7

    REGULATION’: a PROCESS ONAPROCNOT a TEXT ESSNOTAT Extfacebcreate Working Paper 2020/7

    FACEBOOK FACEBOOK REGULATI‘REGULATION’: A PROCESS ONAPROCNOT A TEXT ESSNOTAT EXTFACEBCREATe Working Paper 2020/7 OOKREGULLEIGHTON ANDREWS ATIONAPR OCESSNOT Facebook ‘Regulation’: a process not a text1 Leighton Andrews2 Abstract Discussions of platform governance frequently focus on issues of platform liability and online harm to the exclusion of other issues; perpetuate the myth that ‘the internet’ is unregulated; reinforce the same internet exceptionalism as the Silicon Valley companies themselves; and, by adopting the language of governance rather than regulation, diminish the role of the state. Over the last three years, UK governments, lawmakers and regulators, with expert advice, have contributed to the development of a broader range of regulatory concerns and options, leading to an emergent political economy of advertiser-funded platforms. These politicians and regulators have engaged in a process of sense-making, building their discursive capacity in a range of technical and novel issues. Studying an ‘actually existing’ regulatory process as it emerges enables us to look afresh at concepts of platform regulation and governance. This working paper has a particular focus on the regulatory approach to Facebook, which is presented as a case study. But it engages more widely with the issues of platform regulation through a careful interpretive analysis of official documentation from the UK government, regulatory and parliamentary bodies, and company reports. The regulatory process uncovered builds on existing regulatory frameworks and illustrates that platform regulation is a process, not a finished text. Introduction There is a recurrent tendency in political commentary about major Big Tech platforms to assert that ‘they must be regulated’, as though they exist in some kind of regulatory limbo.
  • Campaign Addresses Illegal Downloads Employees Take Courses

    Campaign Addresses Illegal Downloads Employees Take Courses

    the Observer The Independent Newspaper Serving Notre Dame and Saint Mary’s ndsmcobserver.com Volume 44 : Issue 117 THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2011 ndsmcobserver.com Campaign addresses illegal downloads Professor By AMANDA GRAY researches News Writer A campaign to inform students education about illegal file sharing began recently, Robert Casarez, assis- tant director of the Office of By ANNA BOARINI Resident Life and Housing News Writer (ORLH), said Wednesday. The campaign, held in con- Peace studies Professor junction with the Office of Catherine Bolten, an anthro- Information Technology (OIT) pologist by trade, has focused and help from the Office of her research on the state of General Counsel (OGC), launched education in post-war soci- this week to educate students eties, specifically Sierra about the consequences of Leone. engaging in illegal file sharing, “I started out working as an Casarez said. apprentice for a medicine “We would like to take a proac- man studying ethnobotany in tive approach on the issue rather Botswana 15 years ago, than waiting for the violations,” Bolten said. “When I went to he said. “Over the last year, the LAUREN KALINOSKI | Observer Graphic Cambridge for my master’s I number of copyright infringe- wanted to study AIDS, but ment notices that the University is engaging in illegal download- expressed permission from the Copyright Act representative in after I made a very good has received has more than dou- ing or sharing of copyrighted copyright owner, Casarez said. the OGC, which is then forward- friend from Sierra Leone, bled, and we are aiming to keep material on the University’s net- File sharing is monitored on the ed on to our office for identifica- they convinced me I would be as many students out of the disci- work at any given time.
  • Your Post Has Been Removed

    Your Post Has Been Removed

    Frederik Stjernfelt & Anne Mette Lauritzen YOUR POST HAS BEEN REMOVED Tech Giants and Freedom of Speech Your Post has been Removed Frederik Stjernfelt Anne Mette Lauritzen Your Post has been Removed Tech Giants and Freedom of Speech Frederik Stjernfelt Anne Mette Lauritzen Humanomics Center, Center for Information and Communication/AAU Bubble Studies Aalborg University University of Copenhagen Copenhagen København S, København SV, København, Denmark København, Denmark ISBN 978-3-030-25967-9 ISBN 978-3-030-25968-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25968-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permit- ted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
  • How George Soros Sacked Glenn Beck | the Soros Files

    How George Soros Sacked Glenn Beck | the Soros Files

    12/19/2015 How George Soros Sacked Glenn Beck | The Soros Files ASI You Tube Conference Docs Conference Speeches Contact Us FREE NEWSLETTER Sitemap Who We Are How George Soros Sacked Glenn Beck by Cliff Kincaid on 19 Oct 2011 A recent interview of Fox News chief Roger Ailes by Howard Kurtz suggested that the channel is becoming less conservative by design. The real question, not addressed in the piece, is whether the relentless attacks on the channel by George Soros­funded groups have anything to do with this change in the direction of the popular channel and the demise of the Glenn Beck program in particular. On Glenn Beck’s new TV program, carried on the Internet, Beck himself seemed to indicate this was the case. Talking about Orson Wells, his career, vision and his “Citizen Kane” movie, Beck said, “One of the biggest things [he taught me was] he picked a lot of ill­advised fights, sometimes risking his entire career against titans of industry. It did occur to me recently maybe I should have considered that little part of his life a little more before I locked horns with George Soros.”1 The implication is that Beck’s battle with Soros left him without a job on Fox News. If this is the case, then we have reached a point in the United States when a private individual has obtained the power to prevent the most popular cable news channel in the country from subjecting his financial and political influence to scrutiny. It is important to see how this was done.
  • Reality Check Facebook, Inc

    Reality Check Facebook, Inc

    Reality Check Facebook, Inc. NASDAQ: FB January 24, 2019 “unequivocally wrong” “completely wrong” “not based on any facts or research” —Facebook, Inc. Author Aaron Greenspan Disclosures Aaron Greenspan owns FB put options in his personal capacity. He entered into a confidential settlement with Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, Inc. in 2009. Legal Notices Copyright © 2018-2019 Think Computer Corporation. All Rights Reserved. PlainSite is a registered trademark of Think Computer Corporation. This report is not legal or investment advice. Trade at your own risk. About PlainSite® PlainSite is a legal research initiative jointly run by Think Computer Corporation, a for-profit computer software company, and Think Computer Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. The PlainSite website at https://www.plainsite.org hosts information regarding over eleven million court dockets, as well as millions of documents and government records from federal and state entities. Think Computer Foundation, which also sponsors activities for individuals with disabilities in the Cleveland area, is funded in part by donations from Think Computer Corporation. Visit the Facebook, Inc. PlainSite profile at https://www.plainsite.org/profiles/facebook-inc/. Read our other Reality Check reports at http://www.plainsite.org/realitycheck/. Contact For PlainSite Pro Investor paid early access to future reports, questions, or comments, contact us by e-mail at [email protected]. Executive Summary On paper, Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) is one of the most successful companies in history. With a market capitalization that peaked at over $600 billion, Facebook has been the envy of blue chip executives, entrepreneurs, and FB Price Per Share venture capitalists since it exploded onto the global stage.
  • Censorship, Free Speech & Facebook

    Censorship, Free Speech & Facebook

    Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Volume 15 Issue 1 Article 3 12-13-2019 Censorship, Free Speech & Facebook: Applying the First Amendment to Social Media Platforms via the Public Function Exception Matthew P. Hooker Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjlta Part of the First Amendment Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew P. Hooker, Censorship, Free Speech & Facebook: Applying the First Amendment to Social Media Platforms via the Public Function Exception, 15 WASH. J. L. TECH. & ARTS 36 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjlta/vol15/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hooker: Censorship, Free Speech & Facebook: Applying the First Amendment WASHINGTON JOURNAL OF LAW, TECHNOLOGY & ARTS VOLUME 15, ISSUE 1 FALL 2019 CENSORSHIP, FREE SPEECH & FACEBOOK: APPLYING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS VIA THE PUBLIC FUNCTION EXCEPTION Matthew P. Hooker* CITE AS: M HOOKER, 15 WASH. J.L. TECH. & ARTS 36 (2019) https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context= wjlta ABSTRACT Society has a love-hate relationship with social media. Thanks to social media platforms, the world is more connected than ever before. But with the ever-growing dominance of social media there have come a mass of challenges. What is okay to post? What isn’t? And who or what should be regulating those standards? Platforms are now constantly criticized for their content regulation policies, sometimes because they are viewed as too harsh and other times because they are characterized as too lax.
  • Book Review Justice Beyond Dispute

    Book Review Justice Beyond Dispute

    BOOK REVIEW JUSTICE BEYOND DISPUTE DIGITAL JUSTICE: TECHNOLOGY AND THE INTERNET OF DISPUTES. By Ethan Katsh and Orna Rabinovich-Einy. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 2017. Pp. xi, 910. $24.95. Reviewed by Mary Anne Franks∗ I. INTRODUCTION Jiranuch Triratana was watching her brother scroll through his Facebook feed on April 24, 2017, when they came upon a startling live- stream broadcast. It was from Jiranuch’s boyfriend, Wuttisan Wongtalay.1 He was filming himself and the couple’s eleven-month-old daughter, Natalie, from the roof of a building.2 There was a rope tied around Natalie’s neck.3 As Jiranuch and her brother watched in horror, Wongtalay dropped the infant off the side of the building.4 Jiranuch alerted the police, who found the lifeless bodies of Natalie and her father hanging from ropes off the side of an abandoned hotel in Phuket a few hours later.5 Wongtalay had killed his daughter and then himself.6 Wongtalay’s smartphone was propped up against a nearby wall.7 The two Facebook Live videos showing Wongtalay murdering his daughter were available on the platform for roughly twenty-four hours.8 Before Facebook removed them, one video had been viewed 112,000 times and the other 258,000 times.9 Both had been uploaded to YouTube.10 Facebook responded with a statement that called the killing ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law. 1 Agence France-Presse, Thai Mother Saw Daughter Being Killed on Facebook Live, THE GUARDIAN (Apr. 27, 2017, 2:49 AM), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/27/thai- mother-watched-daughter-being-killed-on-facebook-live [https://perma.cc/KFK6-5UXK].