MAX WEBER, DEMOCRACY and MODERNIZATION Also by Ralph Schroeder

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MAX WEBER, DEMOCRACY and MODERNIZATION Also by Ralph Schroeder MAX WEBER, DEMOCRACY AND MODERNIZATION Also by Ralph Schroeder MAX WEBER AND THE SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE POSSIBLE WORLDS: The Social Dynamic of Virtual Reality Technology Max Weber, Democracy and Modernization Edited by Ralph Schroeder Professor School of Technology Management and Economics Chalmers University palgrave First published in Oreat Britain 1998 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire R021 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-0-333-71254-2 ISBN 978-1-349-26836-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-26836-8 First published in the United States of America 1998 by ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-21244-5 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Max Weber, democracy and modernization 1 edited by Ralph Schroeder. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-21244-5 (cloth) 1. Weber, Max, 1864-192O--Contributions in political science. 2. Weber, Max, 1864-1920-Views on democracy. 3. Democracy. I. Schroeder, Ralph. JC263.W42M37 1998 301'.092-dc21 97-38682 CIP Selection, editorial matter and Chapter 6 © Ralph Schroeder 1998 Chapters 1-5,7-12 © Macmillan Press Ltd 1998 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WIP 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Contents Abbreviations of Weber's Works vii Notes on the Contributors viii Introduction x The Concept of Democracy in Weber's Political Sociology Stefan Breuer 1 2 Democratization in World-Historical Perspective Randall Collins 14 3 State Formation and the Disciplined Individual in Weber's Historical Sociology Roland Axtmann 32 4 Max Weber and Plebiscitary Democracy Sven Eliaeson 47 5 The Nation-State, the Protestant Ethic and Modernization Sam Whimster 61 6 From Weber's Political Sociology to Contemporary Liberal Democracy Ralph Schroeder 79 7 Tocqueville and Weber on the Sociological Origins of Citizenship: The Political Culture of American Democracy Stephen Kalberg 93 8 Max Weber and European Integration Carl Levy 113 9 Back to 'Mitte/europa'? Weber, Germany, and Contemporary Central Europe Zdzislaw Krasnodebski 129 10 Soviet Communism and Weberian Sociology Stefan Breuer 145 v vi Contents 11 Western Impact and Asian Values in Japan's Modernization: A Weberian Critique Wolfgang Schwentker 166 12 Reframing Orientalism: Weber and Islam Mohammad Nafissi 182 Index 202 Abbreviations of Weber's Works The following abbreviations are used whenever reference is made to Max Weber's works. Where references in brackets list both the German and English versions of the same text, this indicates that authors have preferred to use their own translation. AC The Agrarian Sociology of Ancient Civilizations. London: New Left Books, 1976. AJ Ancient Judaism. New York: Free Press, 1952. CS '''Churches'' and "Sects" in North America: An Ecclesiastical Socio­ Political Sketch'. Sociological Theory. 3: 7-13,1985. ES Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968. FMW From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948. GEH General Economic History. New York: Greenberg, 1927. GSW Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Ttibingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1924. MSS The Methodology ofthe Social Sciences. New York: Free Press, 1949. MWG Max Weber Gesamtausgabe. Ttibingen: J.c.B. Mohr, 1984-. PE The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin, 1930. PEK Die Protestantische Ethik I/. Hamburg: Siebenstern Taschenbuch Verlag, 1972. PS Gesammelte Politische Schriften. 4th edn. Ttibingen: J.c.B. Mohr, 1980. PW Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. ROC The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York: Free Press, 1951. ROI The Religion ofIndia: The Sociology ofHinduism and Buddhism. Glencoe, Ill., Free Press. RS Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Religionssoziologie. 3 vols. Ttibingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1920-1. STA 'Ein Vortrag Max Webers tiber die Probleme der Staatssoziologie (Wien)' . Neue Freie Presse. no.19102, 10,26.10.1917. WG Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 5th edn. Ttibingen: J.c.B. Mohr, 1980. WIR Wirtschaftsgeschichte. 4th edn. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1981. WL Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Wissenschaftslehre. 5th edn. Ttibingen: J.e.B. Mohr, 1982. Vll Notes on the Contributors Roland Axtmann is a lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Rela­ tions at the University of Aberdeen. His publications include Liberal Democracy into the Twenty-First Century. Stefan Breuer is Professor of Sociology at the Hochschule fUr Wirtschaft und Po­ litik in Hamburg. He has published two books in German on Weber's political sociology, Max Webers Herrschaftssoziologie [Max Weber's Sociology of Domi­ nation] and Biirokratie und Charisma [Bureaucracy and Charisma]. Randall Collins is Professor of Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania. His publications include two books on Weber; Max Weber: A Skeleton Key and Weberian Sociological Theory. His most recent book is The Sociology of Philoso­ phies. Sven Eliaeson is Professor of Political Science at the University of Karlstad and a docent at the University of Stockholm. In addition to a number of articles on Weber, he has published Bilden av Max Weber [The Image of Max Weber] and the forth­ coming Max Weber's Methodologies. Stephen Kalberg is Associate Professor of Sociology at Boston University. He is the author of Max Weber's Comparative-Historical Sociology, the forthcoming Max Weber and the Sociology of Civilisations, and a number of articles on Weber and on comparisons of German and American society. He is currently researching the cultural foundations of citizenship. Zdzislaw Krasnodebski is Professor for Eastern European Cultural History at the University of Bremen. His main publications (in Polish) include The Understand­ ing of Human Behaviour, The Decline of the Idea of Progress, The Postmodern Cultural Dilemma, and a forthcoming book on Max Weber. Carl Levy is lecturer in European Politics at Goldsmith's College. He has writ­ ten a number of essays on Weber and has edited Socialism and the European Intelligentsia, 1880-1914 and Italian Regionalism: History, Identity, and Politics. He is also the coeditor of The Future of Europe: Problems and Issues for the Twenty-First Century. Mohammad Nafissi is Principal Lecturer in the Department of Policy, Politics and Social Research at the University of North London. He has completed a study of viii Notes on the Contributors ix Weber, Karl Polanyi and Moses Finley and published a number of essays on con­ temporary Middle Eastern politics. Ralph Schroeder is Professor in the School of Technology Management and Eco­ nomics at Chalmers University in Gothenburg. He is the author of Max Weber and the Sociology of Culture and Possible Worlds: The Social Dynamic of Virtual Reality Technology. Wolfgang Schwentker is lecturer in modem history at the University of Diissel­ dorf. He coedited Max Weber und seine Zeitgenossen [Max Weber and his Contem­ poraries] and volume 16 of Weber's Collected Works in German [Political Writings 1918-20]. He has published widely on German and Japanese history and his forth­ coming book, Max Weber in Japan. Eine Untersuchung zur Wirkungsgeschichte 1905-95 is about Weber's reception in Japan. Sam Whimster is Reader in Sociology at London Guildhall University. He has edited Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity and Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy. Introduction Before the end of the Cold War, there was a constant rivalry between Marxian and Weberian sociologists which revolved around the economic determination of polit­ ical change (Marx's position) as against the autonomy of political institutions (Weber's). This volume takes as its point of departure that this pitched theoretical battle, which only ever reached a stand-off, is now over. After the collapse of com­ munism, it is clear that a number of areas - including nationalism, state-formation, legitimacy, and especially the preconditions of democracy and its strengthening - must be reexamined outside the constraints of this polarized debate. And at its broad­ est, the whole question about politics and modernization needs now to be recon­ sidered in sociology. Weber's political sociology has entered subsequent sociological thinking in two ways: on one side, there have been attempts to explicate and systematize his writ­ ings on politics. This literature has not, on the whole, brought Weber's thought to bear on contemporary change. Recent political sociogists who argue in a Weberian vein, on the other hand, have tended to make use of only a few of Weber's ideal types - the state, legitimacy, and bureaucracy - and ignored the question of the dis­ tinctiveness ofthe Weberian perspective. In other words, they have used Weber as a toolkit without engaging with the substance of his ideas. This split reflects a tension within Weber's own writings on politics, some of which were interventions in the political debates of his day, while others were part of the conceptual apparatus that he developed, mainly in Economy and Society. Here the distinction between his various writings will be left to one side; this book is not about the interpretation ofW eber' s work, but about applying his ideas to contempo­ rary political change.
Recommended publications
  • The Decline of Buddhism in India
    The Decline of Buddhism in India It is almost impossible to provide a continuous account of the near disappearance of Buddhism from the plains of India. This is primarily so because of the dearth of archaeological material and the stunning silence of the indigenous literature on this subject. Interestingly, the subject itself has remained one of the most neglected topics in the history of India. In this book apart from the history of the decline of Buddhism in India, various issues relating to this decline have been critically examined. Following this methodology, an attempt has been made at a region-wise survey of the decline in Sind, Kashmir, northwestern India, central India, the Deccan, western India, Bengal, Orissa, and Assam, followed by a detailed analysis of the different hypotheses that propose to explain this decline. This is followed by author’s proposed model of decline of Buddhism in India. K.T.S. Sarao is currently Professor and Head of the Department of Buddhist Studies at the University of Delhi. He holds doctoral degrees from the universities of Delhi and Cambridge and an honorary doctorate from the P.S.R. Buddhist University, Phnom Penh. The Decline of Buddhism in India A Fresh Perspective K.T.S. Sarao Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 978-81-215-1241-1 First published 2012 © 2012, Sarao, K.T.S. All rights reserved including those of translation into other languages. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Beliefs of Hinduism and Buddhism
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Honors Theses Carl Goodson Honors Program 1970 The Basic Beliefs of Hinduism and Buddhism Joyce Mason Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Buddhist Studies Commons, and the Hindu Studies Commons Recommended Citation Mason, Joyce, "The Basic Beliefs of Hinduism and Buddhism" (1970). Honors Theses. 437. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J.f-;_,~--·-- ' (3 ~J~v THE BASIC BELIEFS OF HINDUISM AND BUDDHISM Joyce Mason Special Studies H-490 Religion and Philosophy Dr. Ves ter Wolber January 12, 1970 THE BASIC BELIEFS OF HINDUISM AND BUDDHISM In the world today there are approximately three billion people, who belong to 11 major religions. Nearly all belong to the religion and denomination into which they were born, and accept it naturally, and are loyal to it as they are loyal to their nationality. Religion so exists for many men. "They have been born into a culture, and it ts unthinkable that religion can be anything but part of their being. "l As far as can be determined, religion has existed in every society. The more we learn about the days of man on earth, the more evidence there is that all societies have one thing in common--some form of reli- gion.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Culture, and Economic Performance
    RELIGION, CULTURE, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE Marcus Noland Senior Fellow Institute for International Economics Abstract The hypothesis that the coefficients on variables of religious affiliation are jointly equal to zero can frequently be rejected at conventional levels of statistical significance (i.e., religion matters), but no robust relationship between adherence to major world religions and national economic performance is uncovered, using both cross-national and subnational data. The results with respect to Islam do not support the notion that it is inimical to growth. On the contrary, virtually every statistically significant coefficient on Muslim population shares reported in this paper—in both cross-country and within-country statistical analyses—is positive. If anything, Islam promotes growth. JEL codes: O40, Z12 Keywords: economic growth, convergence, religion, Islam, India, Malaysia, Ghana Author’s note: I would like to thank Scott Holladay, Paul Karner, and Josh Catlin for essential research assistance. Fred Bergsten, Jari Eloranta, Howard Pack, Dave Richardson, and seminar participants at the Korea Development Institute, the East Asia Economics Association meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Middle East Technical University, and the Institute for International Economics offered helpful comments on an earlier draft. Email address: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Abundant evidence affirms that religious belief affects a wide range of behavioral outcomes (Iannaccone 1998), and religious activity can affect economic performance at the level
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes of Unrest: Herbert Giersch and the Origins of Neoliberal Economic Geography
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter; Slobodian, Quinn Article — Published Version Landscapes of unrest: Herbert Giersch and the origins of neoliberal economic geography Modern Intellectual History Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter; Slobodian, Quinn (2019) : Landscapes of unrest: Herbert Giersch and the origins of neoliberal economic geography, Modern Intellectual History, ISSN 1479-2451, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, pp. 185-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244317000324 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181676 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available
    [Show full text]
  • Class, Caste, and Social Stratification in India: Weberian Legacy
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333560917 Class, caste, and social stratification in india: Weberian legacy Article · May 2019 CITATIONS READS 0 4,726 1 author: Hira Singh York University 16 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Ambedkar-Gandhi Debate on Caste View project All content following this page was uploaded by Hira Singh on 02 June 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Class, Caste, and Social Stratification in India: Weberian Legacy Oxford Handbooks Online Class, Caste, and Social Stratification in India: Weberian Legacy Hira Singh The Oxford Handbook of Max Weber Edited by Edith Hanke, Lawrence Scaff, and Sam Whimster Subject: Sociology, Social Theory, Economic Sociology Online Publication Date: May 2019 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679545.013.21 Abstract and Keywords Max Weber’s distinction between class and status, identifying caste as the latter, is the single most important influence on the mainstream sociology of caste. There is ambiguity in Weber’s conceptualization in the sense that the contrast between class and status is marked by precarity in the long run when stabilization of economic power serves as a condition for the predominance of status usurpations. This ambiguity remains unresolved in Weber’s conceptual formulation. Mainstream sociology of caste owing allegiance to Weber reifies the contrast between caste as status and class. In Weber, caste is part of global-historical enquiry. In mainstream sociology, caste is uniquely Indian. It is argued that a critical scrutiny separating the rational and historically verifiable from the irrational empirically-historically unverifiable elements in Weber’s conceptual and theoretical formulations will enrich the Weberian legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Max Weber. <I>Politik Als Beruf (“Politics As a Vocation”)</I>
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 84 Number 84 Spring 2021 Article 12 2021 Book Review: Max Weber. Politik als Beruf (“Politics as a Vocation”) Bertil Haggman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Haggman, Bertil (2021) "Book Review: Max Weber. Politik als Beruf (“Politics as a Vocation”)," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 84 : No. 84 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol84/iss84/12 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Haggman: Book Review: Max Weber. <i>Politik als Beruf (“Politics as a Voca 130 Number 84, Spring 2021 Max Weber. Politik als Beruf (“Politics as a Vocation”). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2010 Reviewed by Bertil Haggman “Politics is a strong and slow drilling of hard boards.” (Die Politik bedeutet ein starkes langsames Bohren von harten Brettern….) This is a quote from the work of one of the most famous sociologists ever, German Professor Max Weber. In 2010 a new edition of his work Politics as a Vocation was published in Berlin, Germany. It is the first in a planned series of new editions of works of the great German sociologist including Staatssoziologie (Sociology of the State) and Wirtschaftsgeschichte (General Economic History). Max Weber was born in 1864 and passed away in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • The Near-Death of Liberal Capitalism: Perceptions from the Weber to the Polanyi Brothers
    10.1177/0032329203252271POLITICSGUENTHERARTICLE & ROTHSOCIETY The Near-Death of Liberal Capitalism: Perceptions from the Weber to the Polanyi Brothers GUENTHER ROTH Karl Polanyi and Max Weber held radically different views of liberal capitalism, but they also came to differ in significant respects with their brothers Michael Polanyi and Alfred Weber. The first section provides an overview of some critical moments in the history of liberal capitalism as perceived by some historical witnesses. The second treats the views of the Weber brothers on the world economy before 1914. The third deals with Max Weber’s overlooked treatment of G. F.Knapp’s once famous state the- ory of money. The fourth (re)turns to the circle of cosmopolitan Austro-Hungarian intellectuals who passionately debated the future of liberal capitalism and almost all of whom became political refugees. Keywords: Karl Polanyi; Max Weber; liberal capitalism; Austro-Hungarian intellectuals; state theory of money I would like to treat some historical moments of the near-death and “miracu- lous” resurrection of liberal capitalism as a particularly fateful lesson in historical contingency. By liberal capitalism (or economic liberalism) I mean first of all multilateral world trade by private enterprise and the currency and credit arrange- ments required by it. Today we often speak of globalization instead of liberal capi- talism and project that term backward. Thus, Harold James’s recent book The End of Globalization turns out to provide, as the subtitle reveals to the unwary reader, Lessons from the Great Depression.1 The first globalization saw the rise, in the nineteenth century, of a liberal world economy, which was characterized by the relatively free movement of persons, capital, goods, and information in an arena POLITICS & SOCIETY, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Charismatic Power
    Theory and Society https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09392-3 Gender and charismatic power Paul Joosse1 & Robin Willey2 # Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Working beyond the inclination to inaugurate alternative theoretical traditions along- side canonical sociology, this article demonstrates the value of recovering latent gender theory from within classic concepts—in this case, Weber’s “charisma.” Close readings of Weber reveal, (a) tools for theorizing extraordinary, non-masculinist agency, and, (b) clues that account for the conventional wisdom (popular and scholastic) that charisma is “not for women.” While contemporary movements may be tempted to eschew charismatic leadership per se because of legacies of dominance by men, there is value in Weber’s formulation, which anticipated the performative turn in social theory that would destabilize biologistic gender ontologies. Value in this exchange also flows back to Weber: by confronting his intermittent tendency to describe charisma in terms that we now recognize as “customs of manly power,” we reveal heretofore unseen imper- fections (i.e., traditionalist modes of legitimation) in his ideal-type. This engagement thus demonstrates an empowering mutuality between contemporary gender theory and “the classics.” The article ends by theorising the nexus of gender and charisma in the case of Trump, pointing to possibilities for vitiating Donald Trump’s charisma, as well as for anti-Trumpian charisma. Keywords Charisma . Donald Trump . Gender. Politics . Populism . Weber Myra Marx Ferree and Carol Mueller (2004) advocated for a push beyond shopworn debates about what the women’smovementis, outlining instead what it is not—in their words, “not new, not only Western, and not always feminist” (2004, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Guru Is the Only Cause, the Ultimate Source and the Bridge That Car- Ries You Across This World
    SPRAWY NARODOWOŚCIOWE Seria nowa / nATIOnALITIEs AFFAIrs New series, 47/2015: 159–174 DOI: 10.11649/sn.2015.064 AnushA GAvAnkAr हेतवे जगतामेव संसारार्णवसेतवे। प्रभवे सर्वविद्यानां शम्भवे गुरवे नमः॥३३॥ hetave jagatāmeva sam˙sārārn.avasetave Prabhave sarvavidyānām˙ śambhave gurave namah. || 33 || The Guru is the only cause, the ultimate source and the bridge that car- ries you across this world. Bow to the one with all knowledge. || 33 || Guru Gita, Skanda Purana1 ‘Guru’ dEvOTIOn In IndIA sOcIO-cuLTurAL PErsPEcTIvEs And currEnT TrEnds To know and understand India one has to travel far in time and space… (Nehru, 1946/1985, p. 200) A b s t r a c t Though the academic study of religion is considered nascent in India, eminent scholars speak of Hindu restoration and the evolution of a guru. In a highly dynamic and pluralistic India, various sociological perspectives stand valid even today, for a better understanding into the spurt of the new movements – religious, spiritual and charismatic. These offer several in- sights into the evolution of the ‘guru phenomenon’ in the ............................... country. We have come a long way from the traditional guru AnushA GAvAnkAr to the contemporary godman (godwoman). The ‘Guru’ in India University of Mumbai, India has today entered the realm of religion. Despite having access E-mail: [email protected] to a wide pantheon of divine entities, what makes a people This work was supported by the author’s own resources. of a nation in current civilized and better literate times, cut No competing interests across all barriers of caste and religion (also class) and surren- have been declared.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI Working Papers MWP 2008/35
    1 EUI Working Papers MWP 2008/35 Max Weber in the 21st Century: Transdisciplinarity within the Social Sciences Frank Adloff and Manuel Borutta (Editors) EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE MAX WEBER PROGRAMME Max Weber in the 21st Century: Transdisciplinarity within the Social Sciences FRANK ADLOFF and MANUEL BORUTTA (Editors) EUI Working Paper MWP No. 2008/35 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. The author(s)/editor(s) should inform the Max Weber Programme of the EUI if the paper is to be published elsewhere, and should also assume responsibility for any consequent obligation(s). ISSN 1830-7728 © 2008 Frank Adloff and Manuel Borutta (selection and editorial matter); individual sections contributors Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy http://www.eui.eu/ http://cadmus.eui.eu/ Table of Contents Foreword Ramon Marimon I. Max Weber in the 21st Century or: how is Transdisciplinarity within the Social Sciences Possible Today?.......................................................................................................01 by Frank Adloff and Manuel Borutta II. Max Weber between ‘Eruptive Creativity’ and ‘Disciplined Transdisciplinarity’…………………………………………………13 by Joachim Radkau III. Weber’s Foundations of the Social Sciences and Rational Choice Theory………………………………………………….......…..31 by Sandro Segre IV. Weber, Marx and Contemporary Economic Theory: a Secular Theory of the Spirit of Capitalism………………………………......43 by Fabrizio Zilibotti V.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Weber Studies
    Max Weber Studies Download Charlemagne font to printer before printing this (use Adobe Downloader). NB. This note will not show up as the text is white—do not delete. MAX WEBER STUDIES Editor Professor Sam Whimster (London) Associate Editors: Dr Austin Harrington (Leeds), Dr Duncan Kelly (Cambridge) Review Editor: Associate Professor Joshua Derman (Hong Kong) Editorial Board Professor Martin Albrow (London), Professor Peter Baehr (Hong Kong), Professor Hinnerk Bruhns (Paris), Professor Hans Henrik Bruun (Copenhagen), Professor David Chalcraft (Sheffield), Dr Xiangqun Chang (London), Professor Sven Eliæson (Uppsala), Dr A’gnes Erde’lyi (Budapest), Dr Jean-Pierre Grossein (Marseille), Dr Edith Hanke (Munich), Professor Dirk Kaesler (Marburg), Professor S tephen Kalberg (Boston, MA), Professor Thomas Kemple (Vancouver, BC), Professor Sung Ho Kim (Seoul), Professor Rainer Lepsius† (Heidelberg), Professor Klaus Lichtblau (Frankfurt), Dr Tom Neuhaus (Derby), Dr David Owen (Southampton, UK), Professor Kari Palonen (Jyväskylä, Fin- land), Professor Gianfranco Poggi (Trento, Italy), Professor Larry Ray (Canterbury, UK), Professor Guenther Roth (New York), Professor Lawrence Scaff (Detroit), Professor Ralph Schroeder (Oxford), Professor Wolfgang Schwentker (Osaka), Professor Alan Scott (New South Wales), Professor Alan Sica (Pennsylvania), Professor Richard Swedberg (Ithaca), Professor Ken’ichi Tominaga (Yokohama), Dr Keith Tribe (Worcester, UK), Professor Stephen Turner (Tampa, FL), Professor Johannes Weiss (Kassel, Germany), Dr Yoshiro Yano (Tokyo), Professor Gina Zabludovsky (Mexico City) Max Weber Studies is published twice a year in January and July. For more information go to www. maxweberstudies.org. Access to the online journal archive at http://mws.quotus.org. Subscription prices: Individuals Institutions Print €39.00 Print €208.65 Online €39.00 Online €232,05 Print + online €44.00 Print + online €243.16 Prices include German VAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing the Axial Age: the Origins and Uses of a Historical Concept
    Theor Soc DOI 10.1007/s11186-013-9193-0 Inventing the axial age: the origins and uses of a historical concept John D. Boy & John Torpey # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Abstract The concept of the axial age, initially proposed by the philosopher Karl Jaspers to refer to a period in the first millennium BCE that saw the rise of major religious and philosophical figures and ideas throughout Eurasia, has gained an established position in a number of fields, including historical sociology, cultural sociology, and the sociology of religion. We explore whether the notion of an “axial age” has historical and intellectual cogency, or whether the authors who use the label of a more free-floating “axiality” to connote varied “breakthroughs” in human experience may have a more compelling case. Throughout, we draw attention to ways in which uses of the axial age concept in contemporary social science vary in these and other respects. In the conclusion, we reflect on the value of the concept and its current uses and their utility in making sense of human experience. Keywords History of social thought . Civilizations . Axial Age . Axiality. Religion . Historical sociology . Cultural sociology Until recently, it was widely said that we live in a time that has exhausted all “grand narratives.” Yet recently some of the biggest names in contemporary scholarship have taken up studies of the very longue durée, and of world history as a whole, in efforts to grasp central aspects of human experience. For example, the sociologist Robert Bellah, the anthropologist David Graeber, the ancient historian Ian Morris, and the psychologist Stephen Pinker have published massive studies going back millennia in time to make sense of our proclivity for religion, the origin of basic categories of economic life, relations of world domination and subordination, and our (putatively declining) propensity toward violence, respectively.
    [Show full text]