<<

2019 Fishery and Survey Data Update Report for the Longfin Inshore ( (Amerigo) pealeii) Stock

by Lisa C. Hendrickson

Population Dynamics Branch National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, MA 02543 April 9, 2019

1.0 Background

This report was prepared for the May 7, 2019 meeting of the Science and Statistics Committee (SSC) of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC). During the meeting, the SSC members will recommend a 2020 Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) for the (Doryteuthis (Amerigo) pealeii) stock. The report contains updates of the landings and the landings spatial distributions of the directed fishery as well as relative abundance and biomass indices for the Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) and Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program (NEAMAP) surveys through 2018.

D. pealeii has a lifespan of less than one year (Macy and Brodziak 2001). The species inhabits the continental shelf and upper slope and ranges between southern Newfoundland and the Gulf of Venezuela, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea (Jereb et al. 2010). The species is most abundant between Georges Bank and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina where a small-mesh bottom trawl fishery occurs throughout the year; offshore during late fall through early spring and inshore during the remainder of the year. The longfin squid population that inhabits the region between the Gulf of Maine and Cape Hatteras, NC (Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Subareas 5 and 6, Figure 1) is managed as a single stock based on evidence from genetics studies (Arkhipkin et al. 2015). The stock is managed by the Mid- Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

2.0 Commercial Fishery Data

During 1967-1986, D. pealeii landings in Subareas 5+6 (Figure 1) were predominately from international fleets. During 1963-1986, total landings averaged 16,489 mt and reached a time series peak of 37,613 mt in 1973 (Table 1, Figure 2). Since 1987, landings have been solely from a domestic, small-mesh bottom trawl fishery that occurs throughout the year. During 1987-2017, landings averaged 15,250 mt with a peak of 23,733 mt in 1989 (Table 1, Figure 2). During this time period, landings were highest during 1988-1995, averaging 20,304 mt, but then gradually decreased between 1999 and 2010 from 19,173 mt to 6,751 mt, respectively. During 2012-2015, landings averaged 12,011 mt and increased to 18,224 mt in 2016. Preliminary landings for 2018, which do not include landings from state-permitted vessels, totaled 11,612 mt. The 2018 landings from state-permitted vessels are not expected to be very high based on the average of 1.4% during 2007-2015.

1

Annual quotas (TACs) for the U.S. fishery were exceeded only once, during the first year (2000) of in-season quotas, but 93%-99% of the annual quotas of 17,000 mt were harvested during 2002 and 2004-2006 (Table 1). With the exception of 2016, when 81% of the annual quota was harvested, only 36%-58% of the annual quotas were harvested during 2009-2017. During 2018, 51% of the quota was harvested.

In addition to stock abundance, availability to the fishery and global loliginid squid prices, D. pealeii landings trends have been affected by in-season quotas since 2000. In-season quotas were quarterly during 2001-2006 and trimester-based during 2000 and since 2007. Landings trends have also been affected by trimester-based catch quotas for Atlantic butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus) since 2011 and discard quotas since March 5, 2013. During Trimester 1 of 2012, the longfin squid fishery was closed when the butterfish catch cap was attained (Table 2, Figure 3). Since 2000, one or more longfin squid fishery closures have occurred per year, with the exceptions of 2010, 2013, 2015, 2017 and 2018, due to harvesting of the quota buffer amount (Table 2).

Landings by trimester have changed over the years. During 2007-2018, quota allocations for Trimesters 1-3 were 43%, 17%, and 40%, respectively. These quota allocations were implemented in 2000 and based on the observed landings percentages, by trimester, during 1994- 1998 (MAFMC 2008). However, the Trimester 2 allocations were impacted by a regulatory change that was implemented in 2010. During 1996-1999 (no in-season quotas) and 2001-2006 (quarterly quotas) longfin squid landings during Trimester 2 totaled 15% and 17%, respectively, of the combined annual landings during these time periods. However, since 2011, most of the annual landings have occurred during Trimester 2 (with the exception of 2013). The Trimester 2 fishery occurs on the species’ spawning grounds. Data from the Northeast Fisheries Observer Program indicate that inshore fishery catches consist of both spawners and incidental catches of their egg masses, which females attach to the seabed. During 2011-2012 and 2014-2017 the Trimester 2 landings comprised 46%, 62%, 48%, 40%, 47% and 48%, respectively, of the annual landings (Figure 3). Landings during Trimesters 1, 2 and 3 comprised 24%, 45%, and 31%, respectively, of the combined landings during 2011-2017. This trend coincided with a decline in the number of large vessels operating in the offshore fishery during 2007-2012 (Arkhipkin et al. 2015) and with a 2010 regulatory change that allowed a Trimester 2 quota increase. The 2010 regulation allowed up to 50% (no cap in 2010) of the Trimester 1 quota underage that was greater than 25% to be rolled-over to Trimester 2. Trimester 2 rollovers from Trimester 1 occurred every year during 2011-2017 and the increased Trimester 2 quotas were exceeded during 2012 (140%), 2014 (104%) and 2016 (148%). During 2018, landings were highest during Trimester 1 (36% of the annual quota) and totaled 31% and 33% of the annual quota during Trimesters 2 and 3, respectively.

D. pealeii landings from 1996 onward are considered the most accurate because reporting of squid landings purchased by federally permitted dealers became mandatory in 1996. The submittal of Vessel Trip Reports (VTRs), which are the current source of fishing effort and location data, also became mandatory in 1996 for longfin squid/butterfish moratorium permit holders.

2

Spatial distributions of D. pealeii landings by the directed fishery, trips with landings greater than 1,134 kg (the regulatory landings limit during fishery closures), were mapped as the sum of the landings by ten-minute square (TNMS) and trimester for 2017 and 2018 combined (Figure 3). The maps were prepared with data from the VTR database because the database comprised of merged records from the 2018 VTR and Dealer Weighout databases were not available yet. As is typical during Trimesters 1 and 3, landings were concentrated along the edge of the continental shelf and were highest in Statistical Areas (SAs) 616 and 622. As is typical during Trimester 2, landings were concentrated on the inshore squid spawning grounds, with the largest area of concentration in Nantucket Sound and south of the islands located off MA, but also in SAs 612 and 613 south of Long Island and in SA 539 located south of Narragansett Bay in RI. Based on the presence of TNMSs with landings at depths greater than 400 m, some misreporting of fishing location data on VTRs is evident.

The landings distribution patterns indicated in Figures 4 and 5 are typical for the fishery, which generally occurs offshore during October-March and inshore during April-September (NEFSC 2011). Landings distribution patterns for the two time blocks were similar during Trimester 1, but were different during Trimesters 2 and 3. During Trimester 2, landings south of Long Island were high along the entire coast during 2009-2012, but were high only along the eastern coast during 2013-2016. During 2013-2016, landings remained high near shore during Trimester 3 and were also concentrated along most of the shelf edge from southern Georges Bank to North Carolina. Landings were mainly concentrated around Hudson Canyon (in Statistical Area 616 and the offshore portion of 613) during Trimester 3 of 2009-2012. Based on the presence of TNMS with landings at depths greater than 400 m, some misreporting of fishing location data is evident in all six maps.

3.0 Survey Data

The capture efficiency of the NEFSC survey bottom trawl gear for D. pealeii, a diel vertical migrator, is highest during the daytime (Jacobson et al. 2015). Indices of relative abundance (stratified mean number per tow) and biomass (stratified mean kg per tow) were derived using daytime tows (tows with solar zenith angles of 43°-80°) from NEFSC fall bottom trawl surveys conducted during 1975-2018 based on the methods described in NEFSC (2011). Indices included catches from inshore strata 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44-46, 59-61 and 65-66 plus offshore strata 1-23, 25-26, and 61-76. FSV H. B. Bigelow indices for 2009 onward were converted to RV Albatross IV units using daytime conversion factors, computed for all sizes combined, from a 2008 vessel calibration study conducted with both vessels during the fall (NEFSC 2011). Coefficients of variation of the survey indices accounted for the variance associated with the Bigelow conversion factors (Table 3). Stratified mean body weights of D. pealeii were computed as the annual stratified mean weight per tow divided by the stratified mean number per tow of squid caught during NEFSC fall research bottom trawl surveys.

Since 2009, NEFSC survey strata ranging in depth from 6 m to 18 m can no longer be sampled because they are too shallow for operation of the FSV H. B. Bigelow. These strata constitute habitat for longfin squid, primarily pre-recruits (≤ 10 cm dorsal length), during the fall (Brodziak and Hendrickson 1999). Therefore, longfin squid relative abundance and biomass indices are also provided for the 2007-2018 fall NEAMAP bottom trawl surveys. The NEAMAP

3

surveys, which have been funded by NOAA Fisheries and conducted by staffs from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, were designed to sample the nearshore strata sampled during NEFSC surveys prior to 2009. The stratified random survey is conducted by a fishing vessel (FV Darana R) with a smaller version of the trawl gear used by the FSV Bigelow. The difference between the NEAMAP and NEFSC survey gears is a 3-in. cookie sweep versus a 16-in. diameter rockhopper sweep (14-in. diameter on the wings, Politis et al. 2014), respectively. Both surveys use the same towing protocols (20 min. at 3.0 kts). During the fall NEAMAP surveys, most of the tows were conducted during October. The NEAMAP surveys occur between Rhode Island Sound and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina and all stations are sampled between sunrise and sunset (approximately 0715-1715). Survey sampling methods and protocols and the methods used to derive the longfin squid relative abundance and biomass indices are provided in Bonzek et al. (2015). However, the longfin squid survey indices included in Bonzek et al. (2015) contained some errors and the corrected fall indices are provided herein. The indices were derived by NEAMAP staff as the back-transformed, stratified geometric mean catch per area- swept by the trawl (in numbers and kg) and include longfin squid catches from all survey strata (Jim Gartland, pers. comm.).

Relative abundance and biomass indices from the NEFSC fall bottom trawl surveys were highly variable (Figure 6), making any underlying trends difficult to discern. In general, relative abundance was below the 1975-2017 median of 638 squid per tow during most years between 1975 and 1998, which averaged 582 squid per tow (Table 3, Figure 6). During this same time period, relative abundance reached a peak of 2,029 squid per tow in 1992. Relative abundance was above the median during most years between 1999 and 2008 and averaged 1,086 squid per tow. During 2012-2016, relative abundance decreased from 1,371 squid per tow to 536 squid per tow, respectively. The 2017 fall survey indices were not computed because the primary regions of longfin squid habitat during the fall, the Mid-Atlantic Bight and Southern New England, were not sampled due to vessel mechanical problems. During 2018, relative abundance was 616 squid per tow (CV = 17%), which was slightly below the median.

Relative abundance and biomass indices were derived using data from the NEFSC spring surveys during1976-2018 based on the methods described in NEFSC (2011). The spring indices were much lower than the fall survey indices (Figure 6), which may be due availability issues because an unknown portion of the stock is distributed south of Cape Hatteras at this time. Spring relative abundance was at or below the 1976-2018 median (97 squid per tow) during most of 1977-1987 and 1993-1998 and was mostly at or above the median during 1988-1992 and 1999-2018. Relative abundance indices in 2017 and 2018 were similar (157 and 156 squid per tow, respectively).

Relative abundance indices for the fall NEAMAP surveys increased between 2010 and 2014, from below the 2007-2017 median (97 squid per tow) in 2010 (38 squid per tow) to a peak of 260 squid per tow in 2014. Thereafter, relative abundance decreased to below the median again in 2017 and was 73 squid per tow in 2018 (Table 4, Figure 7). Trends in relative abundance and biomass were similar. The NEAMAP survey indices were provided as back-transformed geometric means, and as such, cannot be compared directly with the NEFSC survey indices which were computed as arithmetic means. In addition, the NEAMAP and NEFSC survey time series cannot be compared because there are no gear/vessel conversion coefficients available with which to standardize longfin squid catches between the two surveys. Furthermore, longfin

4 squid migration rates between the two survey areas are unknown. The NEAMAP spring survey indices were computed using the same method that was used to compute the fall survey indices (Bonzek et al. 2015). Similar to the NEFSC spring and fall survey indices, the spring NEAMAP indices, for 2008-2018, were much lower than the fall NEAMAP indices (Figure 7). The trends were different between the spring and fall NEAMAP survey indices and the spring peak of 119 squid per tow occurred during 2012 rather than the 2014. After the 2012 peak, spring relative abundance decreased to the lowest level of the time series and remained below the median of 23 squid per tow until 2016 (23 squid per tow). Spring relative abundance during 2018 (46 squid per tow) was above the median. The 2017 spring indices were not computed because, due to vessel problems, the survey was conducted in June (June 13-23) rather than May and sampling only occurred in a portion of longfin squid habitat, between Rhode Island Sound and Atlantic City, New Jersey (49 stations within the longfin squid strata set).

Stratified mean body weights of longfin squid caught during the NEFSC fall bottom trawl surveys were above the 1975-2017 median of 20 g during most years between 1976 and 1994 and were at or below the median during 1995-2018 (Figure 8). As noted above, the indices for 2017 were not computed due to inadequate sampling of D. pealeii habitat. Mean body weight trends reflect the combined effects of growth, mortality, emigration and immigration. For D. pealeii, these factors are primarily influenced by water temperatures during the early life history stages (Dawe et al. 2007).

4.0 Summary

Trimester-based quotas were implemented in 2007, and since then, landings have been below the 1987-2017 mean of 12,250 mt with the exception of 2016. During 2018 the landings were 11,612 mt. Since 2011, most of the annual landings were harvested during Trimester 2 and ranged from 40% to 62%. Fishery closures have also occurred during Trimester 2 in most years since 2011. Annual quotas (TACs) for the U.S. fishery were exceeded only once, during 2000, but 94%-99% of the annual quotas of 17,000 mt were attained during 2002, 2005 and 2006. During 2016, 81% of the annual quota was landed; the highest percentage since 2012 when quotas ranged between about 22,000 and 22,500.

As is typical for squid species, relative abundance and biomass indices were highly variable due to the rapid response of the population to changes in environmental conditions. Relative abundance indices from the fall NEFSC and NEAMAP surveys decreased after 2012 and 2014, respectively, and were below their time series medians during 2015-2016 and 2017, respectively. Abundance and biomass indices were not computed for the 2017 NEFSC fall survey due to the lack of sampling in the areas of primary D. pealeii habitat because of vessel mechanical problems. During 2018, relative abundance indices in both fall surveys were slightly below their medians.

Relative abundance and biomass indices for the NEFSC and NEAMAP spring surveys are much lower than the fall indices for both surveys, which may be due to availability. With the exception of 2013, spring relative abundance indices for the NEFSC surveys have been above the time series median (97 squid per tow) since 2012. The 2018 index (156 squid per tow) was similar to 2017 index. The 2017 index for the spring NEAMAP survey was not computed because only a

5

portion of longfin squid habitat was sampled and the survey was conducted later than normal due to vessel problems. During 2018, spring relative abundance (46 squid per tow) was twice as high as the median.

5.0 Acknowledgements

I thank Chris Tholke (NEFSC) for creating the distribution maps and to Jim Gartland (VIMS) for providing the longfin squid relative abundance and biomass indices from the NEAMAP surveys. I am also very grateful to all of the scientists who collected the data during the NEFSC and NEAMAP bottom trawl surveys.

6.0 References

Arkhipkin, Alexander, I., Paul G. K. Rodhouse, Graham J. Pierce, Warwick Sauer, Mitsuo Sakai, Louise Allcock, Juan Arguelles, John R. Bower, Gladis Castillo, Luca Ceriola, Chih-Shin Chen, Xinjun Chen, Mariana Diaz-Santana, Nicola Downey, Angel F. González, Jasmin Granados Amores, Corey P. Green, Angel Guerra, Lisa C. Hendrickson, Christian Ibáñez, Kingo Ito, Patrizia Jereb, Yoshiki Kato, Oleg N. Katugin, Mitsuhisa Kawano, Hideaki Kidokoro, Vladimir V. Kulik, Vladimir V. Laptikhovsky, Marek R. Lipinski, Bilin Liu, Luis Mariátegui, Wilbert Marin, Ana Medina, Katsuhiro Miki, Kazutaka Miyahara, Natalie Moltschaniwskyj, Hassan Moustahfid, Jaruwat Nabhitabhata, Nobuaki Nanjo, Chingis M. Nigmatullin, Tetsuya Ohtani, Gretta Pecl, J. Angel A. Perez, Uwe Piatkowski, Pirochana Saikliang, Cesar A. Salinas-Zavala, Michael Steer, Yongjun Tian, Yukio Ueta, Dharmamony Vijai, Toshie Wakabayashi, Tadanori Yamaguchi, Carmen Yamashiro, Norio Yamashita & Louis D. Zeidberg. 2015. World squid fisheries. Rev. in Fish. Sci. & Aquacult., 23:2, 92-252. DOI: 10.1080/23308249.2015.1026226.

Bonzek, C. F., J. Gartland, D. J. Gauthier, and R. J. Latour. Data collection and analysis in support of single and multispecies stock assessments in the Mid-Atlantic: Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program Near Shore Trawl Survey Final Report. March, 2015. 325 p.

Brodziak, J. and L. C. Hendrickson. 1999. An analysis of environmental effects on survey catches of , pealei and Illex illecebrosus, in the Northwest Atlantic. Fish. Bull., 97: 9–24.

Dawe, E. G., L. C. Hendrickson, E. B. Colburne, K. F. Drinkwater, and M. A. Showell. 2007. Ocean climate effects on the relative abundance of short-finned (Illex illecebrosus) and long-finned (Loligo pealeii) squid in the Northwest . Fish. Oceanogr. 16 (4): 303–316.

Gartland, J. March 23, 2016. Personal communication. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA.

6

Hatfield E. M. C. and S. X. Cadrin. 2002. Geographic and temporal patterns in size and maturity of the longfin inshore squid (L oligo pealeii) off the northeastern United States. Fish. Bull. 100 (2): 200-213.

Jacobson, L.D., L.C. Hendrickson and J. Tang. 2015. Solar zenith angles for biological research and an expected catch model for diel vertical migration patterns that affect stock size estimates for longfin inshore squid (Doryteuthis pealeii). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 72: 1329–1338, http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0436.

Jereb, P., M. Vecchione and C. F. E. Roper. Family . 2010. In: of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species known to date. Volume 2. Myopsid and Oegopsid Squids. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 4, Vol. 2, pp. 38–117 (P. Jereb and C.F.E. Roper, Eds.). Rome, Italy: FAO.

Macy, W. K. and J. K. T. Brodziak. 2001. Seasonal maturity and size at age of Loligo pealeii in waters of southern New England. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 58(4): 852–864.

MAFMC [Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council]. 2008. 2008 Atlantic Mackerel, Squid and butterfish specifications, 204 p.

Northeast Fisheries Science Center [NEFSC]. 2011. 51st Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop (51st SAW) Assessment Report. Northeast Fish. Sci. Center Ref. Doc. 11-02, 856p.

Politis, P. J., J. K Galbraith, P. Kostovick, R. W. Brown. 2014. Northeast Fisheries Science Center bottom trawl survey protocols for the NOAA Ship Henry B. Bigelow. US Dept. Commer., Northeast Fish. Sci. Cent. Ref. Doc. 14-06, 138 p.

7

Table 1. Landings (mt) of Doryteuthis pealeii, by fleet, during 1963-20181,2,3,4,5.

Year USA International Total TAC1 % of TAC 1963 1,294 0 1,294 1964 576 2 578 1965 709 99 808 1966 722 226 948 1967 547 1,130 1,677 1968 1,084 2,327 3,411 1969 899 8,643 9,542 1970 653 16,732 17,385 1971 727 17,442 18,169 1972 725 29,009 29,734 1973 1,105 36,508 37,613 1974 2,274 32,576 34,850 70,000 1975 1,621 32,180 33,801 70,000 1976 3,602 21,682 25,284 44,000 57 1977 1,088 15,586 16,674 44,000 38 1978 1,476 9,355 10,831 44,000 25 1979 4,252 13,068 17,320 44,000 39 1980 3,996 19,750 23,746 44,000 54 1981 2,316 20,212 22,528 44,000 51 1982 2,848 15,805 18,653 44,000 42 1983 10,867 11,720 22,587 44,000 51 1984 7,689 11,031 18,720 44,000 43 1985 6,899 6,549 13,448 44,000 31 1986 11,525 4,598 16,123 44,000 37 1987 10,367 2 10,369 44,000 24 1988 18,593 3 18,596 44,000 42 1989 23,733 5 23,738 44,000 54 1990 15,399 0 15,399 44,000 35 1991 20,299 0 20,299 44,000 46 1992 19,018 0 19,018 44,000 43 1993 23,020 0 23,020 44,000 52 1994 23,480 0 23,480 44,000 53 1995 18,880 0 18,880 36,000 52 1996 12,503 0 12,503 25,000 50 1997 16,270 0 16,270 21,000 77 1998 19,145 0 19,145 21,000 91 1999 19,173 0 19,173 21,000 91 2000 17,540 0 17,540 15,000 117 2001 14,345 0 14,345 17,000 84 2002 16,868 0 16,868 17,000 99 2003 11,941 0 11,941 17,000 70

8

Table 1. (cont.)

Year USA International Total TAC1 % of TAC

2004 15,738 0 15,738 17,000 93 2005 16,720 0 16,720 17,000 98 2006 15,920 0 15,920 17,000 94 2007 12,342 0 12,342 17,000 73 2008 11,418 0 11,418 17,000 67 2009 9,307 0 9,307 19,000 49 2010 6,751 0 6,751 18,667 36 2011 9,557 0 9,557 19,906 48 2012 12,822 0 12,822 22,220 58 2013 11,212 0 11,212 22,049 51 2014 12,058 0 12,058 22,049 55 2015 11,953 0 11,953 22,445 53 2016 18,182 0 18,182 22,445 81 2017 8,191 0 8,191 22,445 36 2018 11,612 0 11,612 22,445 51

Averages 1963-1986 2,896 13,593 16,489 1987-2017 15,250 0 15,250 2007-2017 11,254 0 11,254 1 Landings during 1963-1978 are from Lange and Sissenwine (1983) and were prorated for countries that did not report by squid species during some years. 2 During 1981-1991, includes Joint-Venture landings between domestic and international vessels. 3 During 1982-1995, includes unclassified squid which were pro-rated by month and 2-digit Statistical Area to separate Illex illecebrosus and D.pealeii landings; post-1996 unclassified landings amounts were small and assumed to be D.pealeii. 4 Landings for 2018 are preliminary because they do not include the landings from state-permitted vessels. 5 TACs for 1974 and 1975 are for I. illecebrosus and D. pealeii combined. .

9

Table 2. Doryteuthis pealeii fishery closures which occurred during 2000-2018 when in-season quotas were in effect. Quotas were trimester-based during 2000 and 2007-2018 and quarterly during 2001-2006. Closures during 2000-2018 triggered a regulatory trip limit of 1,134 kg of D. pealeii.

Year Quota period I Quota period II Quota period III Quota period IV

2000 Mar 25 – Apr 30 Jul 1- Aug 31 Sep 7 – Oct 6, Oct 26 - Dec 31 2001 May 29 – Jun 30 2002 May 28 – Jun 30 Aug 16 – Sep 30 Nov 2 - Dec 11, Dec 24 – Dec 31 2003 Mar 25 - Mar 31 2004 Mar 5 - Mar 31 2005 Feb 20 - Mar 31 Apr 25 - Jun 30 Dec 18 - Dec 31 2006 Feb 13 - Mar 31 Apr 21 - Apr 27, Sep 2 - Sep 30 May 23 - Jun 30 2007 Apr 13 - Apr 30 2008 July 17 - Aug 31 2009 Aug 6 - Aug 31 2010 2011 Aug 23-Aug 31 2012 *Apr 17-Apr 30 July 10 - Aug 31 2013 2014 Aug 11-Aug 31 2015 2016 June 27-Aug 31 2017 2018 * Closure due to attaining the incidental catch cap for Atlantic butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus).

10

Table 3. Relative abundance (stratified mean number per tow) and biomass (stratified mean kg per tow) indices for Doryteuthis pealeii, and CVs (%), derived using daytime tows (tows conducted when solar zenith angles were between 43° and 80°) from NEFSC fall bottom trawl surveys conducted during 1975-2017. Indices include catches from inshore strata 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44-46, 59-61 and 65-66 plus offshore strata 1-23, 25-26, and 61-76. FSV H. B. Bigelow indices for 2009 onward were converted to RV Albatross IV units using “daytime”, fall survey conversion factors computed for all sizes combined based on NEFSC (2011). CVs from 2009 onward account for the variance associated with the FSV Bigelow conversion factors. Year Number per tow CV (%) Kg per tow CV (%) 1975 1,038 14 14.4 11 1976 730 12 18.8 15 1977 513 14 11.5 18 1978 270 16 7.6 11 1979 376 12 8.2 12 1980 562 13 14.2 8 1981 402 10 12.5 6 1982 529 13 12.4 15 1983 814 14 23.7 20 1984 625 10 20.8 17 1985 709 15 19.6 11 1986 720 13 14.8 4 1987 101 9 2.8 9 1988 651 14 9.3 13 1989 830 25 21.5 34 1990 480 12 10.4 14 1991 375 12 11.5 10 1992 2,029 27 10.4 20 1993 185 26 4.9 10 1994 905 11 27.5 15 1995 340 15 5.8 8 1996 306 18 3.8 20 1997 548 21 10.3 22 1998 381 14 5.3 14 1999 1,341 10 15.4 10 2000 1,035 12 30.4 7 2001 431 11 8.5 8 2002 1,960 4 23.4 5 2003 951 8 14.0 11 2004 1,055 14 8.6 10 2005 530 14 9.9 20 2006 1,778 10 22.9 6 2007 1,111 17 10.1 18 2008 667 18 11.3 25 2009 416 9 6.3 13 2010 708 21 15.0 12

11

Table 3. (cont.) Year Number per tow CV (%) Kg per tow CV (%) 2011 339 16 6.6 12 2012 1,371 11 21.0 9 2013 1,012 36 13.3 16 2014 744 13 12.8 11 2015 596 8 9.7 8 2016 536 12 10.6 6 20171 - - 2018 616 17 7.4 18 Median 1975-2017 638 11.8 1 The 2017 fall survey indices were not computed because the primary regions of longfin squid habitat during the fall, the Mid-Atlantic Bight and Southern New England, were not sampled due to vessel mechanical problems.

12

Table 4. Relative abundance and biomass indices (back-transformed, stratified geometric mean number and kg, respectively, per area-swept) for Doryteuthis pealeii, and 95% confidence limits, derived using data from NEAMAP fall bottom trawl surveys conducted during 2007-2018. All tows were conducted between sunrise and sunset.

Year LCI Number per tow UCI LCI Kg per tow UCI 2007 116.5 143 174.4 4.2 4.9 5.8 2008 38.1 48 60.9 2.4 2.8 3.3 2009 91.6 118 152.0 5.0 5.8 6.9 2010 29.3 38 48.8 2.9 3.4 4.1 2011 38.1 46 56.0 2.7 3.1 3.5 2012 49.1 60 74.0 2.9 3.4 3.9 2013 76.5 97 123.6 4.8 5.7 6.8 2014 208.4 260 324.0 9.4 11.0 12.8 2015 87.9 105 126.3 6.5 7.5 8.7 2016 78.4 99 125.1 5.4 6.4 7.5 2017 50.8 63 78.4 4.0 4.6 5.3 2018 56.7 73 92.2 5.5 6.6 7.8 Median 2007-2017 97 4.9

13

Figure 1. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) nominal catch reporting areas, Subareas 3-6 and associated Divisions, for fisheries conducted in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean.

14

Figure 2. Landings (000’s mt) of Doryteuthis pealeii, by fleet, and TACs (000’s mt) during 1963-2018. The 2018 landings are preliminary because landings from state-permitted vessels were not available.

Figure 3. Percentages of the annual landings of Doryteuthis pealeii, by Trimester (T1, T2 and T3), during the current management regime of trimester-based quotas. Landings during 2018 are preliminary because landings from state-permitted vessels were not available. Asterisks indicate D. pealeii fishery closures during a portion of the trimester due to attaining the buffer percentage of the specific trimester quota for D. pealeii. The T1 fishery closure during 2012 was attributable to attaining the incidental catch cap for Atlantic butterfish (Peprilus triancanthus).

15

Figure 4. Distribution of landings (mt) from bottom trawl trips with Doryteuthis pealeii landings greater than 1,134 mt (2,500 lbs), summed by ten-minute square and trimester, for 2017 and 2018 combined. The Southern Gear Restricted Area (GRA) is in effect from January 1 to March 15 (Trimester 1) and the Northern GRA is in effect from November 1 to December 31. Squid fishing is not permitted in the GRAs during these time periods because bottom trawls with a codend mesh size less than 127 mm diamond mesh (5.0 in., inside stretched mesh) are prohibited. East of 72º 30’ N, squid fishing is only permitted in small-mesh exemption areas which are not shown here. The 100 m and 400 m isobaths are shown. Landings in ten-minute squares shown at depths greater than 400 m are incorrect fishing locations that were reported in the Vessel Trip Reports.

16

Figure 5. Doryteuthis pealeii indices of relative abundance (stratified mean number per tow) and biomass (stratified mean kg per tow) indices derived using daytime tows (solar zenith angles of 43°-80°) from NEFSC fall bottom trawl surveys conducted during 1975-2018. The 2017 survey indices were not computed because the primary regions of D. pealeii habitat during the fall were not sampled due to vessel mechanical problems.

Figure 6. Doryteuthis pealeii indices of relative abundance (stratified mean number per tow) and biomass (stratified mean kg per tow) derived using daytime tows (solar zenith angles of 29°-84°) from NEFSC spring bottom trawl surveys conducted during 1976-2018. The 2014 survey indices were not computed because the primary regions of D. pealeii habitat during the spring were not sampled due to vessel mechanical problems.

17

Figure 7. Doryteuthis pealeii indices of relative abundance (stratified geometric mean number per tow) and biomass (stratified geometric mean kg per tow) derived with data from NEAMAP fall (top) bottom trawl surveys conducted during 2007-2018 and spring (bottom) bottom trawl surveys conducted during 2008-2018.

18

Figure 8. Stratified mean body weights of Doryteuthis pealeii (stratified mean kg per tow/ stratified mean number per tow) derived from NEFSC fall bottom trawl survey data, 1967-2018. The dashed line represents the 1967-2017 median body weight. The 2017 fall survey indices were not computed because the primary regions of D. pealeii habitat during the fall, the Mid- Atlantic Bight and Southern New England, were not sampled due to vessel mechanical problems.

19