R. R. 2 Paris, France Victoria, B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

R. R. 2 Paris, France Victoria, B - .. Participants in Third Pugwash Conference of Nuclear Scientists Kitzbuhel- Vienna, Austria, September 14-21, 1958 Australia Denmark Professor M. L. Oliphant Professor Mogens Pihl Research School of Physical Sciences Universitetets Institut for Teoretisk Fysik Australian National University Blegdamsvej 15 Box 4, G. P. 0. Copenhagen r}, Denmark Canberra, Australia France Austria Father Daniel DuBarle Professor Hans Thirring 29 Boulevard Latour-Maubourg Studlhofgasse 13 Paris VII, France Vienna IX, Austria Dr. Bernard P. Gregory Bulgaria Frecambaut Elancourt (S et 0), France Academician G. Nadjakov Vice President Dr. J. Gueron Academy of Science 15 Rue de Siam Sofia, Bulgaria 'Paris 16, France Canada Professor A. Lacassagne Institut du Radium Dr. Brock Chisholm 26 Rue d'Ulm R. R. 2 Paris, France Victoria, B. C. , Canada German Democratic Republic Sir Robert Watson- Watt Box 323, Church Lane Prof. Dr. Gunther Rienacker Thornhill, Ontario, Canada Tschaikowskystrasse 40/42 Berlin-Nieder s chonha us en Czechoslovakia German Democratic Republic Prof. Dr. Viktor Knapp Federal Republic of Germany Praha 1 Parizska Tr. 27 Dr. Max Born Pravnicka, Fakulta, Czechoslovakia 4 Marcardstrasse Bad Pyrmont, West Germany Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Kozesnik Secretary General, Academy of Sciences Prof. Dr. Gerd Burkhardt Narodni Trida 3 Tizianstrasse 5 Prague, Czechoslovakia Hannover, West Germany .. -2- Federal Republic of Germany (cont. ) Hungary Prof. Dr. Helmut Honl Professor Lajos Janossy Zabiusstrasse 117 Academy of Sciences Freiburg/ Breisgau, West Germany Budapest, Hungary Professor Werner Kliefoth India Muehlestrasse 10 (14A) Heidenheim/ Brenz Dr. H. J. Bhabha West Germany Gave rnment of India Atomic Energy Commission Dr. Hanfried Lenz Apollo Pier Road Potschner Stras se 8 Bombay 1, India Munchen 19, West Germany Sir K. S. Krishnan Great Britain National Physical Laboratory New Delhi 12, India Lord Boyd-Orr Bre chin-Angus Professor P. C. Mahalanobis Scotland Indian Statistical Institute Calcutta 35, India Prof. Dame Kathleen Lansdale 121 Station Road West Drayton Middlesex, England Professor E. Amaldi Via le Parioli 50 Professor C. F. Powell Rome, Italy H. H. Wills Physical Laboratory Bristol, England Professor E. Boeri Institute of Human Physiology Prof. M. H. L. Pryce, F.R.S. Universita H. H. Wills Physical Laboratory Ferrara, Italy Bristol, England Japan Professor J. Rotblat Physics Department Professor Yasuo Miyake Medical College of St. Bartholomew's Meteorological Research Institute Hospital Mabashi, Suginami, Japan Charterhouse Square London, E. C. 1, England Professor Iwao Ogawa Department of Physics Rt. Hon. Earl Russell St. Paul's (Rikkyo) University Plas Penrhyn Ikebukuro Penrhyndeudraeth Tokyo, Japan Merioneth, North Wales Professor Schoichi Sakata Sir George Thomson 3-41 Takugawayama, Chikusaku Corpus Christi College Nagoya, Japan Cambridge, England -3- Japan (cont.) United States (cont.) Professor S. Tomonaga Professor William Davidon Department of Physics Argonne National Laboratory Tokyo University of Education Box 299 Tokyo, Japan Lemont, Illinois, U.S. A. Professor Hideki Yukawa, Director Professor Bernard T. Feld Research Institute for Fundamental Physics Physics Department 26-405 Tokyo University Mass. Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan Cambridge 39, Massachusetts, U.S. A. Netherlands Prof. H. Bentley Glass Department of Biology Professor B. R. A. Nijboer Johns Hopkins University Institute for Theoretical Physics Baltimore 18, Maryland, U.S. A. Maliesingel 23 Utrecht, Holland Dr. Morton Grodzins, (untill0-1-59) Center for Advanced Study in the Norway Behavioral Sciences Stanford, California, U.S. A. Dr. Gunnar Randers Trosterud Stien 4 Dr. David L. Hill Slemdal, Oslo, Norway American Management Counsel 515 Madison Avenue Poland New York 22, New York, U.S. A. Professor Leopold Infeld Dr. Martin Kaplan Instytur Fizyki La Chenaie Uniwer sytetu Warszawakiego La Pallanterie Fizyka Teoretyczana Vesenaz-Geneva, Switzerland Warszawa, Poland Prof. Hermann J. Muller United States Zoology Department Indiana University Professor Harrison Brown Bloomington, Indiana, U.S. A. Division of Geological Sciences California Institute of Technology Professor Jay Orear Pasadena, California, U.S. A. Department of Physics Cornell University Dr. David Cavers Ithaca, New York, U.S. A. 639 Mirada Avenue Stanford, California, U.S. A. Dr. H. Palevsky Physics Department Professor Charles Coryell Brookhaven National Laboratory Department of Chemistry Upton, Long Island, New York, U.S. A. Mass. Institute of Technology Cambridge 39, Massachusetts, U. S. A. -4- United States (cont. ) Professo:r E. K. Fedorov Academy Nauk Professor Linus Pauling Len L~ sky Prospect 13-22 3500 Fairpoint Street Moscow, U.S. S. R. Pasadena, California, U.S. A. P rofesso·r Eugene Korovin Professor Eugene Rabinowitch R ue J oukovsky 11 l og. 22 Department of Botany Moscow, U.S.S.R. University of Illinois Pro£esE:or A. M. Kuz.in Urbana, Illinois, U.S. A. Academy of Sciences Bi ophysical I nstitute Professor Frederick Seitz Leninskiy prospect 33 Physics Department Moscow, U.S.S.R. University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois, U.S. A. Mr. V. P. Pavlichenko Academy of Sciences Professor Walter Selove Leninskiy prospect 14 Physics Department Moscow, U.S.S.R. University of Pennsyl vania Philadelphia 4, Pennsylvania, U.S. A. Academician D. V. Skobeltzyn, Director T. N. Lebedev Institute of Physics Professor Leo Szilard Leninsldy prospect University of Chicago Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1155 East 57th Street Chicago 3 7, Illinois, U.S. A. Academician A. V. Topchiev Academy of Sciences Dr. Alvin M. Weinberg Len:i.nskiy prospect 14 111 Maylon Lane Mosr.ow, U.S.S.R. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S. A. Dr. Victor S. VavEov T. N. Lebedev Institute of Physics Professor Victo1· Weisskopf Lenlnskiy p r ospect Department of Physics Moscow, U.S.S.R. Massachusetts Institute of Tedmology Massachusetts, U.S. A. Cambridge, Academician A. P. Vinogradov Academy of Sciences Professor Eugene P. Wigner Vernadsky's Inst. of Geochemistry and 8 Ober Road Anal ytical Chemistry Princeton, New Jersey, U.S. A. Vorabievskoe shosse 47 a Moscow, U.S.S.R. U.S.S.R. Yugoslavia Academician N. N. Bogolubov Steklof Mathematical Institute Professor P avle Savic Moscow, U.S.S.R. Institute of Nuclear Sciences "Boris Kidrich" p. f. 522 Professor N. Dobrotin Beograd, Yugoslavia Physical Institute, Academy of Sciences Moscow, U.S. S. R. APPENDIX APPENDIX I List of those attending the first Pug\YfiSh Conference at Pug wash, Nova Scotia, July 6 to 11, 1957: M. L. E. Oliphant (physics) Australia. H. Thirring (physics) Austria. G. Brock Chisholm (psychiatry) Canada. JohnS. Foster (physics) Canada. Chou Pei Yuan (physics) China. A.M. B. Lacass.'tgne (medicine) France. C. F. Powell (physics) Great Britain . •T. Rotblat (physics) Great Britain. I. Ogawa (physics) Japan. H. Yukawa (physics) Japan. S. Tomonaga (physics) Japan. M. Danysz (physics) Poland. D. F. Cavers (law) U.S.A. L. Szilard (physics) U.S.A. H. J. Muller (genetics) U.S.A. P. Doty (chemistry) U.S.A. E. Rabinowitch (biophysics) U.S.A. W. Selove (physics) U.S.A. Y. Weisskopf (physics) U.S.A. A. i\1. Kuzin (biophysics) U.S.S.R. D. F. Skobeltzyn (physics) U.S.S.R. A. V. Topchiev (chemistry) U.S.S.R.1 List of those attending the second Pngwash Conference at Lac Beanport, Que· bee, March 31 to Aprilll, 1958 : Prof. M. L. Oliphant, Australia. Prof. Cyrias Ouellet, Canada. Sir Robert Watson-,Vatt, Canada. Prof. Chou Pei Yuan, Peoples Republic of Chiun. Prof. Bernard Gregory, France. Prof. C. F. von Weizsacker, Germany. Sir Charles G. Darwin, Great Britain. Prof. C. F. Powell, Great Britain. Prof. J. Rotblat. Great Britain. Prof. C. H. Waddington, Great Britain. Prof. A.M. Kuzin, Soviet Union. Academician D. F . Skobeltzyn, Soviet Union. Academician A. V. Topchiev, Soviet Union. Academician A. P. Vinograclov, Soviet Un ion. Prof. John Edsall, United States. Prof. Morton Groclzins, United States. Mr. William A. Higinbotham, United Stnte.. Col. RichardS. Leghorn, United States. Prof. Linus Pauling, United States. Prof. Eugene Rabinowitch, United States. Prof. Leo Szilard, United States. Prof. Jerome B. Wiesner, United States.' 1 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September 1957, p. 248. 'Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 1958, p. 195. 95 96 THE PUGWASH CONFERENCES List of those attending the third Pugwash Conference at Kitzbuhel, Austria, September 14 to 19, and at Vienna, September 20, 1958: Australia: Japan-Continued M. L. E. Oliphant Schoichi Sakata Austria: Hideki Yukawa Hans Thirring Netherlands: Canada: B. R. A. Nijboer Brock Chisholm Norway: Robert Watson-Watt Gunnar Randers Czechoslovakia : Poland: Viktor Knapp Leopold Infeld J. Kozefiik U.S.A.: Denmark: Harrison Brown Mogens Pihl David Cavers France: Charles Coryell Daniel DuBarle William Davidon Bernard Gregory Bernard Felcl J. Gueron Bentley Glass Antoine Lacassagne Morton Grodziu;; German Democratic Republic : David Hill GUnther Rienacker Martin Kaplan Federal Republic of Germany : H. J. Muller i\Iax Born Jay Orear G. Burkhardt Harry Palevsky Helmut Honl Linus Pauling Werner Kliefoth Eugene Rabinowitch llanfried Lenz l!,rederick Sei t:r. Great Britain: Walter Selove John Boyd-Orr Leo Szilard Kathleen Lonsdale Alvin Weinberg C. F. Powell Yictor \Veisskopf ;\I. H. L. Pryce Eugene Wigner J. Rotblat U.S.S.R.: Bertrand Russell N. N. BogolubOI' George Thomson X. A. Dobrotin Hungary: E. K. Fedorov Laj o,; J anossy lD. A. Korovin India: A.l\1. Kuzin II.. J. Bbabba V. P. Pavlichenko K. S. Krishnan D. V. Slwbelt:r.yu P. C. Mahalanobis A. Y. Topchiev Italy: V. S. Vavilov E. Amaldi A. P. Vinogratlov lD. Boeri Yugoslavia: Ja1>an: Paul Sa vic" Iwao Ogawa S. Tomonaga Yasuo Miyake 'Bullrtln of the Atomic Scientists, Novcmbrr 1958, p. 343. THE PUGVVASH CONFERENCES 125 on phasing and how you get from an arms race to a disarmed world; secondly: that the revolutionary fervour has been increased, that there is the desire to tal'e over the noncompetitively, the result of the Chinese bu8ine8s has been in­ creased, this is going to make it a\vfully complicated. But anyway, we l.Ja ve got to probe their governmental intentions, and if they really feel the way their scientists do, we are at a significant turning point in history .
Recommended publications
  • Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1989 Between Two Amnesties: Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848 Leopold G. Glueckert Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Glueckert, Leopold G., "Between Two Amnesties: Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848" (1989). Dissertations. 2639. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2639 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1989 Leopold G. Glueckert BETWEEN TWO AMNESTIES: FORMER POLITICAL PRISONERS AND EXILES IN THE ROMAN REVOLUTION OF 1848 by Leopold G. Glueckert, O.Carm. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1989 Leopold G. Glueckert 1989 © All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with any paper which has been under way for so long, many people have shared in this work and deserve thanks. Above all, I would like to thank my director, Dr. Anthony Cardoza, and the members of my committee, Dr. Walter Gray and Fr. Richard Costigan. Their patience and encourage­ ment have been every bit as important to me as their good advice and professionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Peace Prize
    TITLE: Learning From Peace Makers OVERVIEW: Students examine The Dalai Lama as a Nobel Laureate and compare / contrast his contributions to the world with the contributions of other Nobel Laureates. SUBJECT AREA / GRADE LEVEL: Civics and Government 7 / 12 STATE CONTENT STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS: -Identify, research, and clarify an event, issue, problem or phenomenon of significance to society. -Gather, use, and evaluate researched information to support analysis and conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The student will demonstrate the ability to... -know and understand The Dalai Lama as an advocate for peace. -research and report the contributions of others who are recognized as advocates for peace, such as those attending the Peace Conference in Portland: Aldolfo Perez Esquivel, Robert Musil, William Schulz, Betty Williams, and Helen Caldicott. -compare and contrast the contributions of several Nobel Laureates with The Dalai Lama. MATERIALS: -Copies of biographical statements of The Dalai Lama. -List of Nobel Peace Prize winners. -Copy of The Dalai Lama's acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize. -Bulletin board for display. PRESENTATION STEPS: 1) Students read one of the brief biographies of The Dalai Lama, including his Five Point Plan for Peace in Tibet, and his acceptance speech for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace. 2) Follow with a class discussion regarding the biography and / or the text of the acceptance speech. 3) Distribute and examine the list of Nobel Peace Prize winners. 4) Individually, or in cooperative groups, select one of the Nobel Laureates (give special consideration to those coming to the Portland Peace Conference). Research and prepare to report to the class who the person was and why he / she / they won the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Peace Prize
    The Nobel Peace Prize The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded seven times Ralph Bunche, U.S., UN Mediator in Palestine to the United Nations, its leadership and its (1948), for his leadership in the armistice agreements organizations signed in 1949 by Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria 1954 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner 1957 for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to refugees Lester Pearson, Canada, ex-Secretary of State, President, 7th Session of the UN General Assembly, 1961 for a lifetime of work for peace and for leading UN Dag Hammarskjöld, Sweden, Secretary-General efforts to resolve the Suez Canal crisis of the UN, for his work in helping to settle the Congo crisis 1974 Sean MacBride, Ireland, UN Commissioner for 1965 Namibia Office of the United Nations High United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), for its Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, for its work in helping save lives of the world's children assistance to European refugees . 1969 1994 International Labour Organisation (ILO), Geneva, for its progress in establishing workers' rights and Yasser Arafat , Chairman of the Executive protections Committee of the PLO, President of the Palestinian National Authority. Shimon Peres, Foreign Minister 1981 of Israel. Yitzhak Rabin, Prime Minister of Israel. for Office of the United Nations High Commissioner their efforts to create peace in the Middle East. for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to Asian refugees 1996 1988 Carlos Felipe Ximenes Belo and Jose Ramos-Hort United Nations Peace-keeping Forces, for its for their work towards a just and peaceful solution to peace-keeping operations the conflict in East Timor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Journey to Rome
    A Literary Journey to Rome A Literary Journey to Rome: From the Sweet Life to the Great Beauty By Christina Höfferer A Literary Journey to Rome: From the Sweet Life to the Great Beauty By Christina Höfferer This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by Christina Höfferer All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7328-4 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-7328-4 CONTENTS When the Signora Bachmann Came: A Roman Reportage ......................... 1 Street Art Feminism: Alice Pasquini Spray Paints the Walls of Rome ....... 7 Eataly: The Temple of Slow-food Close to the Pyramide ......................... 11 24 Hours at Ponte Milvio: The Lovers’ Bridge ......................................... 15 The English in Rome: The Keats-Shelley House at the Spanish Steps ...... 21 An Espresso with the Senator: High-level Politics at Caffè Sant'Eustachio ........................................................................................... 25 Ferragosto: When the Romans Leave Rome ............................................. 29 Myths and Legends, Truth and Fiction: How Secret is the Vatican Archive? ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Universities, Academic Freedom, Labour, and the Left
    Canadian Universities, Academic Freedom, Labour, and the Left Michiel Horn IN 1934 THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA classicist William Hardy Alexander used the pages of a recently established left-wing periodical to pose the question: "Will radical leadership emerge from our Canadian universities?" He answered in the negative. "The 'successful1 way of life in our universities may be equated wiUi the life of conformity both to doctrine and authority."1 Five years later, Alexander wrote in a Canadian Forum article that there was an agreeable future in academe for the acquiescent, those willing to fit in, but not for those of a critical disposition. Addressing himself to a fictional "young man contemplating an academic career," Alexander noted that capitalism sanctioned "a most painfully unbalanced distribu­ tion of the satisfactions and opportunities of life, to say nothin of the bare necessities." But it was dangerous for academics to point this out, he added, for in a state university it was "invariably described as Bolshevism," and in a privately endowed institution the situation was even worse. "An unflinching examination of the defeat sustained by the 'good life' in modern capitalistic conditions is regarded as a personal criticism of the benevolent persons who have established the academic foundation."2 Most professors wisely did not challenge the economic status quo, Alexander continued: they were easily replaced, and the principle of academic freedom offered them little protection. If such freedom had ever existed in the past, and he did not think it ever did "in things deemed by the ruling powers to be essential to the preservation of their power," it was now in decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Global Empire Internals.Indd
    1 Genesis of an empire ‘We look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilisation’ — Voltaire he Scottish Empire is, of course, illusory but the giants who spread their infl uence Tacross the globe off er tangible evidence that, had they had the mind to make it so, the saltire of St Andrew or the more fl amboyant lion rampant might have fl own across much of the civilised world and the atlases could have had a very diff erent hue. Th is, however, is not an empire of colonisation that diminishes or enslaves those whom it embraces. It involves neither the greed nor the ruthlessness so oft en inherent in empire-building. It is without condescension: an empire that breaks down barriers rather than creating ownership and, it can be claimed, enhances civilisation. Where would you plant the fl ag to claim sovereignty of ideas and philosophies? Th is is not a recital of the adventures of conquering heroes, although some are included. Th e empire I have in mind is more an outreach of ideas, the story of human endeavour in its many forms, pushing at the boundaries of the imagination and stretching the accepted order. It sweeps from the foothills of press freedom to the high plains of moral philosophy; from the oceans of ingenuity to the great rivers of physical courage; from the borderlands where determination meets initiative to the mighty mountain ranges of originality. It encompasses everything from the spirit of pioneering to the mystical qualities of leadership. It’s luckily not dependent on a seat of power and nor is it aff ected by the bruising arguments about Scotland’s place within the UK or as an independent state.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome: a New Planning Strategy
    a selected chapter from Rome: A New Planning Strategy by Franco Archibugi draft of a forthcoming book to be published by Gordon and Breach, New York an overview of this book CHAPTER 5: THE NEW STRATEGY FOR ROME 1. The "Catchment Areas" of the New "Urban Centres" 2. The Spatial Distribution of the Catchment Areas Table 2 - Catchment Areas of the Roman Metropolitan System (by thousands of inhabitants) 3. What decentralization of services for the new "urban centres"? 4. What "City Architecture"? 5. What Strategy for "Urban Greenery"? 6. Programmed Mobility 7. A "Metropolitan" Residentiality Notes References Further Reading THE NEW STRATEGY FOR ROME Authentic "polycentrism", therefore, is founded first of all on an evaluation of the "catchment areas" of the services that define it. The location of the centers and infrastructures of such services is a subsequent question (we would say "secondary" if with this adjective is meant not inferiority in importance, but rather a temporal and conceptual subordination). The polycentrism supported here in Rome means, first of all, a theoretical assignation of the potentiality of the catchment area of the Roman system to respective "units" of service that locationally assume the 1 role of realizing the objectives, reasserted by everybody numerous times of: integrating functions, improving accessibility, distances, traveling times, not exceeding the thresholds that have been indicated as "overloading". The locational problem of the new strategy therefore, is posed as a problem of not letting all the users participate in any function in any part of the system (the 2,8 million Roman citizens plus the by now recognized other 700 thousand citizens of the Roman "system"); but to functionally distribute the services in such a way as to not render "indifferent" (but on the contrary very..
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Spatial Inequalities and Urban Transformation. the Case of Rome
    Socio-Economic Planning Sciences xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Socio-Economic Planning Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/seps Socio-spatial inequalities and urban transformation. The case of Rome districts ∗ Keti Leloa, Salvatore Monnib, , Federico Tomassic a Department of Business Studies, Roma Tre University, Via Silvio D'amico 77, Rome, 00145, Italy b Department of Economics, Roma Tre University; Via Silvio D'amico 77, Rome, 00145, Italy c Italian Agency for Territorial Cohesion, Rome, Via Sicilia 162, Rome, 00187, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Over the past thirty years, public policy in Rome has failed to effectively address a rising level of socio-economic Socio-spatial inequalities inequality. Indicators such as level of education or number of household members appear to be geographically Mapping concentrated and sensitive to the distance from the city centre. The hypothesis that socio-spatial inequalities Periphery strongly influence economic performance and foster political instability has been subject to numerous empirical Rome investigations. Nevertheless, studies of specific urban contexts are not common. The absence of empirical ap- plications at this scale is probably due to the fact that variables used for analysing the economic and social performance of regions are difficult to quantify or inapplicable at the micro level. The purpose of this paperisto examine the spatial distribution of socioeconomic inequalities in the municipal territory of Rome and to explore the conditions that account for them. We will analyse the spatial distribution of urban quality indicators and socio-economic profiles with data from different sources, aggregated at the neighbourhood level. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Death of Roma and Sinti in Italy: a Modern Tragedy
    n o t e b o o k ITALY’S BAD EXAMPLE The Life and Death of Roma and Sinti in Italy: A Modern Tragedy Henry Scicluna1 oma have been present in Italy since spite of the fact that they have been living the 15th century, partly as a result of uninterrupted in Italy for several decades.2 migrations from Southeast Europe caused by the expansion of the Ot- It is estimated today that the Romani toman Empire. Romani groups from population in Italy numbers around 140,000. the Ionic and Adriatic coast settled in the south Eighty thousand of them have Italian nationality. R th of Italy, followed in the 16 century by the settle- The recent census shows there are 12,346 Roma ment of Sinti groups from Northern Europe in the living around Rome, Naples and Milan. The north of Italy. Vlax Roma arrived from Moldavia Government estimates that 12,000, mostly and Valacchia in the 19th century. At the end of from Romania, left Italy between the beginning the First World War all Roma in the annexed ter- of June 2008 and October 2008, when the ritories became Italian citizens. government undertook a census.3 Another migration, this time from Croatia and Slovenia, occurred during the Second The Italian perception of Roma and Sinti World War. Starting in the 1960s, there were other waves of migration from Poland, Roma and Sinti in Italy are referred to as “nomads” Hungary and ex-Yugoslavia, particularly after (Nomadi) by both the authorities and the general the disintegration of the latter and the Balkan population, who believe that these communities wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Der Nobelpreisträger
    Physiologie Wirtschafts- Jahr Physik Chemie oder Literatur Frieden wissenschaften Medizin Wilhelm Henry Dunant Jacobus H. Emil von Sully 1901 Conrad — van ’t Hoff Behring Prudhomme Röntgen Frédéric Passy Hendrik Antoon Theodor Élie Ducommun 1902 Emil Fischer Ronald Ross — Lorentz Mommsen Pieter Zeeman Albert Gobat Henri Becquerel Svante Niels Ryberg Bjørnstjerne 1903 William Randal Cremer — Pierre Curie Arrhenius Finsen Bjørnson Marie Curie Frédéric John William William Mistral 1904 Iwan Pawlow Institut de Droit international — Strutt Ramsay José Echegaray Adolf von Henryk 1905 Philipp Lenard Robert Koch Bertha von Suttner — Baeyer Sienkiewicz Camillo Golgi Joseph John Giosuè 1906 Henri Moissan Theodore Roosevelt — Thomson Santiago Carducci Ramón y Cajal Albert A. Alphonse Rudyard \Ernesto Teodoro Moneta 1907 Eduard Buchner — Michelson Laveran Kipling Louis Renault Ilja Gabriel Ernest Rudolf Klas Pontus Arnoldson 1908 Metschnikow — Lippmann Rutherford Eucken Paul Ehrlich Fredrik Bajer Theodor Auguste Beernaert Guglielmo Wilhelm Kocher Selma 1909 — Marconi Ostwald Ferdinand Lagerlöf Paul Henri d’Estournelles de Braun Constant Johannes Albrecht Ständiges Internationales 1910 Diderik van Otto Wallach Paul Heyse — Kossel Friedensbüro der Waals Allvar Maurice Tobias Asser 1911 Wilhelm Wien Marie Curie — Gullstrand Maeterlinck Alfred Fried Victor Grignard Gerhart 1912 Gustaf Dalén Alexis Carrel Elihu Root — Paul Sabatier Hauptmann Heike Charles Rabindranath 1913 Kamerlingh Alfred Werner Henri La Fontaine — Robert Richet Tagore Onnes Theodore
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Institute of Agriculture Georgika
    Sydney Institute of Agriculture Georgika Edition 3, December 2020 Georgika - an online newsletter for those interested in academic aspects of the Ag sector From the Director Alex McBratney Please enjoy the latest edition of Georgika where we highlight our research work in agriculture, our people and our ongoing links to our alumni and collaborators and stakeholders in the agricultural sector. This has been an unparalleled year in many ways – a pandemic and record yields on our farms. Something to remember forever. Some of us think the sooner we get to a new one the better. I’d like to thank everyone for all their diligent hard work over such a difficult year – despite the challenges I believe we are in a stronger position institutionally and nationally in relation to our agricultural effort, commitment, and standing than we were at the beginning of the year. So, I wish you a wonderful break. Take it – enjoy it. Wishing you a very happy and successful 2021 – it’s got to be better than this one. Distant links to Sydney I have been to loads of agriculture conferences around the world and we are often reminded of the phenomenal pioneering crop-breeding work of the Iowan, Norman Borlaug and his many colleagues and co-workers that led to his being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970. Often this is stated as the first, and the only, Nobel prize in agriculture. In the nineteen twenties and thirties John Boyd Orr was Director of the Rowett Research Institute, famous for its work on animal nutrition.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Physics in Poland Before 1939*
    THEORETICAL PHYSICS IN POLAND BEFORE 1939* 1. INTRODUCTION Science, and in particular the exact sciences, is not a part of culture easily accessible to people outside a small group of experts in the given field. There is, however, at least one aspect of science - which seems not to be always duly appreciated - that can be found equally interesting and worthy of attention by both specialists and non-specialists, scientists and non-scientists. It is the history of science, of scientific institutions and of the people of science. The main goal of this work is to describe the genesis and development of theoretical physics in Poland till 1939. In the sketch presented here I begin by recalling the history of physics as a whole in Poland up to the moment when theoretical physics became a distinct field. This happened in the late 19th century. From that moment on I will focus only on theoretical physics. On its substance, I find it reasonable to split the history of physics in Poland before 1939 into the following periods: - first: up to the establishment of the Commission for National Education; - second: up to the end of the 19th century; - third: up to World War II. It is probably no coincidence that the abovementioned stages correspond roughly to the stages we find in the history of science, and of physics in particular, in the rest of the world. One may say that the first period is that of the origins of modern physics as an empirical and rational science, crowned by the works of Newton and their development in the 18th century.
    [Show full text]