Snake Salt River Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Snake Salt River Basin Snake/Salt River Basin Hoback River Table of Contents Watershed Description ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Aquatic Wildlife ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Identification of Conservation Areas ..................................................................................................................... 5 Threats......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Conservation Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................... .8 Recommended Conservation Actions .................................................................................................................. 11 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Wyoming State Wildlife Action Plan – 2017 Page III – 16 - 1 Aquatic Basins Wyoming Game and Fish Department Snake/Salt River Basin Watershed Description Wyoming’s Lincoln, Teton, Sublette, and Park counties. Land ownership is predominantly Six major basins were identified for public with only 8% privately held. These conservation planning purposes under this State private lands, however, tend to be vital for Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) using aquatic wildlife along the riparian corridors. hydrographic boundaries and fisheries Public land is primarily managed by the U.S. assemblage and management considerations. Forest Service (69%) and National Park Service The basins each include one to four sub-regions (Grand Teton National Park, 21%). (4-digit hydrologic unit code [HUC] There are approximately 4,900 miles of streams watersheds). This approach allows the nesting on the USGS National Hydrography Dataset in of multiple spatial and temporal scales for the Snake/Salt River basin. Major drainages in planning and prioritizing conservation actions. the basin include the Salt, Hoback, Gros Ventre, The Snake/Salt River basin corresponds with Buffalo Fork and Snake rivers. the Upper Snake sub-region. It includes two 6- Additional information about the basins digit HUCs: Snake Headwaters and Upper drainages, geography, geology, land forms, Snake River (Figure 9), eight sub-basins (8-digit climate, dams, reservoirs and diversions, HUCs) and twenty-nine watersheds (10-digit hydrology, habitat types, land use and HUCs). These watersheds span an area of classifications are detailed in the 2010 SWAP. about 5,100 square miles in northwestern Wyoming State Wildlife Action Plan – 2017 Page III – 16- 2 Aquatic Basins Wyoming Game and Fish Department Snake/Salt River Basin Figure 9. Snake/Salt River Basin. Wyoming State Wildlife Action Plan – 2017 Page III – 16- 3 Aquatic Basins Wyoming Game and Fish Department Snake/Salt River Basin Aquatic Wildlife The native gamefish community is composed only of Snake River and Yellowstone Cutthroat Fish Trout and Mountain Whitefish. The nonnative Twenty-three fish species are found in the basin. gamefish community consists of seven species Cutthroat trout are represented by Yellowstone of introduced salmonids and chars. The Cutthroat Trout O. clarkii bouvieri and an nongame fish community consists of 10 native unnamed presumed subspecies, the fine-spotted species and the introduced Fathead Minnow or Snake River Cutthroat Trout O. clarkii ssp. and White Sucker. Additionally, various tropical Thirteen species or subspecies are native to the fish species have been illegally introduced into basin, and ten are introduced. The WGFD Kelly Warm Springs. recognizes and manages fine-spotted Snake Simon (1951) surveyed 10 sites in the River Cutthroat Trout separately from other Snake/Salt River basin and documented the cutthroats. This distinction has been made presence of all known native species, as well as within the WGFD management program since Arctic Grayling. The Snake River Cutthroat 1955. Trout has been considered a distinct, undefined, fine-spotted variety of cutthroat trout (Behnke 1992). Table 9. Fishes present in the Snake/Salt River basin. Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are followed by an asterisk (*). Native game Native nongame Nonnative game Nonnative nongame Mountain Whitefish Bluehead Sucker* Bear River Cutthroat Fathead Minnow Snake River Cutthroat Longnose Dace Trout White Sucker Trout* Mottled Sculpin Brook Trout Yellowstone Cutthroat Mountain Sucker Brown Trout Trout* Northern Leatherside Golden Trout Chub* Grayling Paiute Sculpin Kokanee Salmon Redside Shiner Lake Trout Speckled Dace Rainbow Trout Utah Chub Utah Sucker Four fishes, including both subspecies of introduced in the basin although the timing and cutthroat trout, are considered Species of location is unknown. While White Sucker Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN). The two remain rare, White Sucker x Utah Sucker cutthroat subspecies have long been the focus hybrids were common in samples recently of fisheries management efforts in the basin. analyzed (Mandeville et al. 2015). Bluehead Sucker and Northern Leatherside Chub are also SGCN. Aquatic Reptiles No turtles are native to the Snake/Salt River No known native species have been extirpated basin and none have been introduced. from the watershed, but two introduced nongame species have been documented in the Freshwater Mollusks and Crayfishes past decade. Fathead Minnow was first Wyoming is still in the discovery phase in terms documented in the Snake River below Jackson of its freshwater mussels and gastropods. Lake Dam in 2002 and in the Lower Salt basin Although fingernail and pill clams and aquatic in 2003. White Sucker have also been gastropods are often encountered during Wyoming State Wildlife Action Plan – 2017 Page III – 16- 4 Aquatic Basins Wyoming Game and Fish Department Snake/Salt River Basin invertebrate sampling, few published accounts Table 10. Species of Greatest Conservation exist (Beetle 1989, Henderson 1924, Hoke 1979, Need present in the Snake/Salt River Basin Hovingh 2004). Many native mussels, clams, and gastropods are considered SGCN by the Fish Bluehead Sucker WGFD due to a lack of information regarding Northern Leatherside Chub status. Snake River Cutthroat Trout Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout A single species of mussel, the Western Pearlshell, is known to inhabit the Snake/Salt Crustaceans River basin. Western Pearlshell are widespread Pilose Crayfish and are not considered a SGCN (Mathias 2014). Little is known about species present and Mollusks Jackson Lake Springsnail distributions of gastropods in the basin. One native species, the Jackson Lake Springsnail, has been documented in the watershed. The nonnative New Zealand Mudsnail has been introduced to the basin above Jackson Lake. All of the native gastropods in the basin are considered SGCN. Identification of Conservation Areas The only crayfish species that has been Most of the Snake/Salt basin is of high documented in the Snake/Salt River basin is the conservation value for SGCN. Priority areas for Pilose Crayfish. This is a native species found conservation activities during the term of this during both recent surveys (Hubert 1988, plan are shown in Figure 10. Hubert 2010). There is no evidence of the presence of non-indigenous crayfishes in the Aquatic conservation priorities in the watershed Snake River drainage. include, but are not limited to, the mainstem Snake and Salt River corridors, spring streams tributary to these rivers, the lower reaches of Pacific Creek, and Snake and Salt River tributaries that sustain wild cutthroat populations and Bluehead Suckers. Additionally the Gros Ventre River drainage is a priority for both cutthroat trout and Northern Leatherside Chub. Wyoming State Wildlife Action Plan – 2017 Page III – 16- 5 Aquatic Basins Wyoming Game and Fish Department Snake/Salt River Basin Figure 10. Aquatic Wildlife Conservation Areas in the Snake/Salt River Basin. Threats drainage severely fragment the watershed and limit fish movement, mainly through stream dewatering. Lateral and longitudinal hydrologic Water development/altered flow regimes – connectivity is reduced and fish populations are Moderate physically restricted from habitats necessary to Natural flow regimes in stream segments complete their life history in many parts of the around the state have been altered by human drainage. activities, including irrigation diversions and water developments for enhanced water supply, The combined effects of Jackson Lake Dam and hydropower, and flood control. These altered the levee system have altered flow regimes, flow regimes are also a consequence of broad- instream habitat, and riparian function. Levees scale changes in land use and management were initially used in the 1950s to protect associated with agriculture, grazing, timber private property and now constrain the Snake harvest, and housing development (see River from Grand Teton National Park to south Wyoming Leading Wildlife Conservation of Jackson. Jackson Lake Dam has altered flow Challenges – Disruption of Historic regimes and blocked
Recommended publications
  • Wild & Scenic River
    APPENDIX 2-E WILD & SCENIC RIVER ELIGIBILITY EVALUATION BRIDGER-TETON NATIONAL FOREST Background Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, Congress declared that there are certain rivers in the nation that possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, and cultural values that should be preserved in a free-flowing condition. These rivers and their environments should be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. During forest plan revision, a comprehensive evaluation of the forest‘s rivers is required to identify those that have potential to be included in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Forest planning must address rivers that meet one of these criteria: Are wholly or partially on National Forest System lands Were identified by Congress for further study Are in the Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) Have been identified as a potential Wild and Scenic River by inventory conducted by the agency. The BTNF identified 31 river segments as potential Wild and Scenic Rivers during an inventory in 1991-1992; a number of additional eligible segments have been identified since and they have been added to the total list of __ river segments and __ miles in each of the following categories. In order to be considered eligible rivers must be essentially free flowing and have one or more outstandingly remarkable values. Rivers identified as eligible will be managed to maintain eligibility until suitability is determined. Rivers determined to be eligible were given a tentative classification as wild, scenic, or recreational according to their proximity to development and level of access.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou National Forest Monitoring And
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Caribou- Targhee National Forest 1 Caribou Monitoring Report: 2002-2003 Caribou - Targhee National Forest Caribou Monitoring and Evaluation Report Abstract The Caribou and Targhee National Forests were officially combined in the spring of 2000. The Caribou zone published an Analysis of the Management Situation in 1999 that identified several Needs for Change. The AMS determined that many of the Caribou’s ecological communities are “functioning but at risk” and the 1985 LRMP management was not adequate to improve these conditions. As a result, the Caribou Plan was revised. On February 19, 2003, Regional Forester Jack Troyer approved the Caribou Revised Forest Plan. Forest managers began implementing the Caribou RFP on May 12, 2003. The monitoring required during the 2003 has not been entirely completed or compiled and will not be reported until 2004. This report touches on most of the functional areas of the Caribou but highlights areas where we have made extensive strides towards enhancing the human and natural environment. At the end of the field season the Forest expects to have completed fish distribution surveys on all perennials streams. These surveys show which streams are “strongholds” for the sensitive Yellowstone and Bonneville cutthroat trout. The Caribou RFP includes new livestock utilization standards designed to enable the Forest to allow grazing while maintaining or improving stream conditions. For the past two years, the Montpelier District has been working with the research division of the Forest Service to develop effective methods for restoring tall forb communities. The Selenium Area-Wide Advisory Committee continues to work on reducing selenium risk in new mining operations and developing methods to clean up areas currently contaminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 1 the Columbia River, a River of Power
    Lesson 1 The Columbia River, a River of Power Overview RIVER OF POWER BIG IDEA: The Columbia River System was initially changed and engineered for human benefit Disciplinary Core Ideas in the 20th Century, but now balance is being sought between human needs and restoration of habitat. Science 4-ESS3-1 – Obtain and combine Lesson 1 introduces students to the River of Power information to describe that energy curriculum unit and the main ideas that they will investigate and fuels are derived from natural resources and their uses affect the during the eleven lessons that make up the unit. This lesson environment. (Clarification Statement: focuses students on the topics of the Columbia River, dams, Examples of renewable energy and stakeholders. Through an initial brain storming session resources could include wind energy, students record and share their current understanding of the water behind dams, and sunlight; main ideas of the unit. This serves as a pre-unit assessment nonrenewable energy resources are fossil fuels and fissile materials. of their understanding and an opportunity to identify student Examples of environmental effects misconceptions. Students are also introduced to the main could include loss of habitat to dams, ideas of the unit by viewing the DVD selection Rivers to loss of habitat from surface mining, Power. Their understanding of the Columbia River and the and air pollution from burning of fossil fuels.) stakeholders who depend on the river is deepened through the initial reading selection in the student book Voyage to the Social Studies Pacific. Economics 2.4.1 Understands how geography, natural resources, Students set up their science notebook, which they will climate, and available labor use to record ideas and observations throughout the unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River 1157 Wildlife Habitat Information to Inform the Plan- Ton, and Northeast Oregon
    Snake River 1157 wildlife habitat information to inform the plan- ton, and northeast Oregon. +roughout its long ning decisions for renewable energy. history, volcanoes, flooding, and glaciers have Climate change impacts may be felt in the arid shaped the river and its shores. region; nitrogen deposits, atmospheric carbon +e Snake River plain was created by a volca- dioxide, and other changes will impact the grass- nic hotspot beneath Yellowstone National Park, lands. Climate change may impact the size of the which holds the headwaters and origin of the river. sagebrush areas, for example, which in turn con- Flooding as the glaciers retreated after the ice age stricts grouse and other birds and mammals liv- created the current landscape, including eroded ing in these habitats. canyons and valleys. Mountains and plains are typical terrain along the river. +e Snake River has P J. C more than 20 major tributaries, most of them in the mountains; Hells Canyon is the deepest river Further Reading gorge in North America. Cutright, Paul Russell. Lewis and Clark: Pioneering +e Snake River is home to salmon and steel- Naturalists . Lincoln: University of Nebraska head, which were central to the lives of the Nez Press, 2003. Perce and Shoshone, the dominant tribal nations Petersen, Keith C. River of Life, Channel of Death: before the Europeans came. People have lived Fish and Dams on the Lower Snake . Corvallis: along the Snake River for over 15,000 years. +e Oregon State University Press, 2001. Snake River may have been given its name by the Waring, Gwendolyn. L. A Natural History of Shoshones, as a hand signal made by the Shosho- the Intermountain West: Its Ecological and nes representing fish was misinterpreted by Euro- Evolutionary Story.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Snake River Canyon Indicated by Revised Stratigraphy of Snake River Group Near Hagerman and King Hill, Idaho
    History of Snake River Canyon Indicated by Revised Stratigraphy of Snake River Group Near Hagerman and King Hill, Idaho GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 644-F History of Snake River Canyon Indicated by Revised Stratigraphy of Snake River Group Near Hagerman and King Hill, Idaho By HAROLD E. MALDE With a section on PALEOMAGNETISM By ALLAN COX SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 644-F Lavaflows and river deposits contemporaneous with entrenchment of the Snake River canyon indicate drainage changes that provide a basis for improved understanding of the late Pleistocene history UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-171031 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1128 CONTENTS Page page Abstract ___________________________________________ Fl Late Pleistocene history of Snake River_ _ F9 Introduction.______________________________________ 2 Predecessors of Sand Springs Basalt. 13 Acknowledgments --..______-__-____--__-_---__-_____ 2 Wendell Grade Basalt-________ 14 Age of the McKinney and Wendell Grade Basalts. _____ 2 McKinney Basalt. ____---__---__ 16 Correlation of lava previously called Bancroft Springs Bonneville Flood.________________ 18 Basalt_________________________________________ Conclusion___________________________ 19 Equivalence of pillow lava near Bliss to McKinney Paleomagnetism, by Allan Cox_________ 19 Basalt.._________________________ References cited._____________________ 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Index map of Idaho showing area discussed.______________________________________________________ F2 2. Chart showing stratigraphy of Snake River Group..____________________________._____--___-_-_-_-.
    [Show full text]
  • Teton County Wildlife Crossings Master Plan
    Teton County Wildlife Crossings Master Plan by Marcel P. Huijser, PhD1 Corinna Riginos, PhD2 Matt Blank, PhD1 Rob Ament, MSc1 James S. Begley, MSc1 and Edward R. Jenne, BSc3 1Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University 2Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative 3E.R. Jenne Illustration FINAL REPORT Western Transportation Institute, College of Engineering, Montana State University, P.O. Box 174250. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 A report prepared for Teton County 320 S. King Street, Jackson, Wyoming 83001, USA June 23, 2018 Teton County Wildlife Crossings Master Plan Disclaimer and Acknowledgements DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Western Transportation Institute (WTI) or Montana State University (MSU). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors of this report would like to thank Teton County for funding this project. Special thanks are due to the following organizations and individuals who have provided data or other information. Their contributions have been critical to the project’s success. • Chris Colligan (Greater Yellowstone Coalition) • Alyson Courtemanch (Wyoming Game & Fish Department) • Keith Compton (WYDOT) • Gary Fralick (Wyoming Game & Fish Department) • Morgan Graham (Teton Conservation District) • Susan Johnson (Teton County) • Jon Mobeck (Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation)
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest
    Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest Prepared for Bridger-Teton National Forest P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, WY 83001 by Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Dept 3381, 1000 E. University Avenue University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 21 February 2012 Cooperative Agreement No. 07-CS-11040300-019 ABSTRACT Three sensitive and two other Wyoming species of concern were inventoried in the Wyoming and Salt River Ranges at over 20 locations. The results provided a significant set of trend data for Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii), expanded the known distribution of Robbin’s milkvetch (Astragalus robbinsii var. minor), and relocated and expanded the local distributions of three calciphilic species at select sites as a springboard for expanded surveys. Results to date are presented with the rest of species’ information for sensitive species program reference. This report is submitted as an interim report representing the format of a final report. Tentative priorities for 2012 work include new Payson’s milkvetch surveys in major recent wildfires, and expanded Rockcress draba (Draba globosa) surveys, both intended to fill key gaps in status information that contribute to maintenance of sensitive plant resources and information on the Forest. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All 2011 field surveys of Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii) were conducted by Klara Varga. These and the rest of 2011 surveys built on the 2010 work of Hollis Marriott and the earlier work of she and Walter Fertig as lead botanists of Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. This project was initially coordinated by Faith Ryan (Bridger-Teton National Forest), with the current coordination and consultation of Gary Hanvey and Tyler Johnson.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Plan Amendment No. 30 Clearwater National Forest Latah
    Forest Plan AmendmentNo. 30 Clearwater National Forest Latah County, Idaho The purpose of Amendment No. 30 is to changethe water quality objectives in Appendix K of the Clearwater National Forest Plan for Little Boulder Creek, East Fork Potlatch River, and Ruby Creek, plus, add the Potlatch River. Currently the water quality objective for Little Boulder, East Fork Potlatch and Ruby Creek is "Minimum viable" and the fish speciesis listed as rainbow. Minimum Viable does not support the requirements of the Clean Water Act to provide fishable streams. It only provides a minimal population and does not reflect the listing of the species or importance of the area for spawning. Surveys have documented steelhead in Little Boulder, East Fork Potlatph Riyer, and Ruby Creek. Steelheadwas listed as a Threatened Species within the Snake River in 1997. The Potlatch River, a migratory channel for steelhead,had only been listed in Appendix K as a placeholder to indicate the watershed geography. Stream surveys have shown the river to have a C channel and steelheadas the fish species. Spawning occurs in the East Fork Potlatch, and rearing occurs in most of the tributaries of the Potlatch River. Since the Potlatch River is proposed as critical habitat for steelhead,the water quality objective is being changed from "Minimum Viable" to "High Fish" to follow the direction of the Clean Water Act and Endangered SpeciesAct. Also, as part of the high fish standard, threshold levels of sediment for the Potlatch River should not exceed 10 out of 30 years. Since the proposed changes are not significant, adoption of this amendmentwould not significantly change the forest-wide environmental impacts disclosed in the Clearwater National Forest Plan EIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Snake/Salt River Basin Water Plan Update Groundwater Study Level 1 (2011 - 2014) Available Groundwater Determination Technical Memorandum No. 7 Executive Summary Karl G. Taboga Prepared for the Wyoming Water Development Commission June 2014 INTRODUCTION Between 2001 and 2006 the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) completed individual water plans for each of Wyoming’s seven major river basins. Technical Memorandum S of the previous Snake/Salt River Basin Water Plan (Sunrise Engineering and others, 2003) contains a groundwater resource investigation that thoroughly examines the basin’s resources and usage. The 2014 Available Groundwater Determination presented in this report updates and expands the previous technical memorandum with a new compilation of information and represents the most current assessment of the groundwater resources of the Snake/Salt River Basin. This technical memorandum has the following objectives: • Identify the major (most widely used) aquifers in the Snake/Salt River Basin. • Define the three-dimensional extent of the aquifers. • Describe the physical characteristics, water chemistry, and potential contaminants of the aquifers and confining (hydrogeologic) units. • Estimate the quantity of water in the aquifers. • Describe the aquifer recharge areas. • Estimate aquifer recharge rates. • Estimate the “safe yield” potential of the aquifers and describe implications of hydrologically connected groundwater and surface water. • Describe and evaluate existing groundwater studies and models. • Identify future groundwater development opportunities to satisfy projected agricultural, municipal, and industrial demands. SNAKE/SALT RIVER BASIN DESCRIPTION This report examines groundwater resources that underlie the Snake/Salt River drainage basin in Wyoming as well as areas in Idaho that are tributary to the Wyoming part of this basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Snake River Dams Stakeholder Engagement Report
    Lower Snake River Dams Stakeholder Engagement Report FINAL DRAFT March 6, 2020 Prepared by: Kramer Consulting Ross Strategic White Bluffs Consulting Contents Executive Summary .......................................................... 1 Opportunities to Increase Understanding .................................... 52 Background and Context ............................................................... 2 Public Comments Related to Agriculture ..................................... 52 Major Findings and Perspectives ................................................... 3 Section 7: Transportation .............................................. 53 Opportunities to Increase Understanding .................................... 12 Context ........................................................................................ 53 Moving Forward ........................................................................... 13 Perspectives ................................................................................ 60 Section 1: Purpose and Scope of Report ..................... 15 Opportunities to Increase Understanding .................................... 62 Background .................................................................................. 15 Public Comments Related to Transportation............................... 62 The Intent of the Report and Engagement Process .................... 15 Section 8: Recreation ..................................................... 64 Methodology................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Fur Trade Far West
    HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN FUR TRADE OF THE FAR WEST THE American Fur Trade OF THE Far West A History of the Pioneer Trading Posts and Early Fu.r Companies of the Missouri Valley and the Rocky Mountains and of the Overland Commerce with Santa Fe. AIAP AND ILLUSTRATIONS BY HIRAM MAR TIN CHITTENDEN captain Corps of Engineers, U.S. A., Author of "The Yellowstone." THREE VOLUMES VO~UME III. NEW YORK FRANCIS P. HARPER 1902 CoPYRIGHT, 1901, BY FRANCIS P. HARPER All rights reserved APPENDICES. C< ;py OF LETTER FROM PIERRE l\IENARD TO PIERRE CHOLTTE;\L'. An account of the first attack by the Blackfeet upon the :\Iissouri Fur Company at the Three Forks of the Missouri in the summer of 1810. Below are given in the original and corrected French and in English translation copies of a letter found among the Chouteau papers. It is probably the only document in exist­ ence that was written upon the identical spot where the old fort of the St. Louis Missouri Fur Company stood at the Three Forks of the Missouri. It narrates an important event in the series of disasters which overtook the company in that quarter, and is a genuine messenger from that forlorn band under Henry who later, when driven from this position, crossed the Divide and built the first trading establishment upon Columbian waters. The original of this letter, in four pages, written upon a sheet of fine light blue paper. full let­ ter size, and still in excellent preservation, is in the posses­ sion of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Web Monthly Report
    Business.Bus Name Business.Mail Addr1 Business.Mail Cit Business.MBusiness.Mail Abadan Intermountain Dist 110 S 500 West Provo UT 84601 Cache Creek Tax & Accounting, L970 W Broadway PMB 101 Jackson WY 83001 Field CPAs PC 145 E. Snow King Jackson WY 83001 Green, James S. CPA PO Box 4996 Jackson WY 83001 Hawkins, Kominsky & DeVries 175 East Deloney Jackson WY 83001 Kobert CPA, Kraig A. 610 W Broadway Jackson WY 83001 Leavell & Associates PO Box 1830 Jackson WY 83001 Line One Inc PO Box 4485 Jackson WY 83001 Linsenmann & Linsenmann LLC PO Box 7879 Jackson WY 83002 Norman Mellor III P.A. 970 W Broadway Jackson WY 83001 Sorensen & Sorensen PC 280 E. Broadway Jackson WY 83001 Thompson Palmer & Associates 275 East Broadway Jackson WY 83001 Wilkinson Associates, LLC PO BOX 627 Jackson WY 83001 Circumerro Inc. PO Box 4980 Jackson WY 83001 Finegan/Thompson Advertising PO Box 3860 Jackson WY 83001 Gliffen Designs PO Box 12932 Jackson WY 83002 Jackson Hole Attraction Menu PO Box 34 Jackson WY 83001 Jackson Hole Enterprises 2340 Grand Teton Circle Jackson WY 83002 Local Pages, The 4910 West Amelia Earhart Drive Salt Lake CIty UT 84116 Phone Directories Co. LP PO Box 2277 Orem UT 84059-2277 Rocky Mountain Marketing Soluti PO Box 8669 Jackson WY 83002 Atelier One, Ltd. 125 South King Street Jackson WY 83001 Berlin Architects, LLC PO Box 4119 Jackson WY 83001 Bluesky Creative LLC PO Box 7009 Jackson WY 83002 Bozart Design LTD PO Box 8789 Jackson WY 83002 Bulat, Paul Architect 745 West Broadway Jackson WY 83001 Burke, Carolyn Coleman 3083 Rangeview Jackson WY 83001 Burton Design, Inc.
    [Show full text]