DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study for the Rexland Acres – Sewer Expansion Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Study for the Rexland Acres – Sewer Expansion Project INITIAL STUDY FOR THE REXLAND ACRES – SEWER EXPANSION PROJECT Prepared for: Kern County Public Works Department 2700 “M” Street, Suite 400 Bakersfield, California 93301-2323 Prepared by: Tom Dodson & Associates P.O. Box 2307 San Bernardino, California 92406-2307 (909) 882-3612 July 2020 Rexland Acres - Sewer Expansion Project TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ....................................................................... 3 Determination ................................................................................................................... 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ................................................................................ 5 I. Aesthetics ........................................................................................................... 7 II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources ................................................................... 8 III. Air Quality ........................................................................................................... 9 IV. Biological Resources .......................................................................................... 19 V. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 21 VI. Energy ................................................................................................................ 22 VII. Geology and Soils .............................................................................................. 23 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................... 26 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...................................................................... 29 X. Hydrology and Water Quality .............................................................................. 31 XI. Land Use and Planning ...................................................................................... 33 XII. Mineral Resources .............................................................................................. 33 XIII. Noise .................................................................................................................. 34 XIV. Population and Housing ...................................................................................... 36 XV. Public Services ................................................................................................... 37 XVI. Recreation .......................................................................................................... 37 XVII. Transportation .................................................................................................... 38 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources ................................................................................... 39 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems .............................................................................. 40 XX. Wildfire ............................................................................................................... 41 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................... 42 Summary of Mitigation Measures ...................................................................................... 44 References ....................................................................................................................... 47 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix 2 – Air Quality / GHG Analysis Appendix 3 – Biological Resources Assessment Appendix 4 – Cultural Resources (CONFIDENTIAL) TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page ii Rexland Acres - Sewer Expansion Project TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES Figure 1-1 Project Location Figure 1-2 Sewer Collection System – Alternative 1 Figure 1-3 Sewer Collection System – Alternative 2 Figure 1-4 Area of Potential Effects TABLES Table III-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................................................. 10 Table III-2 Health Effects of Major Criteria Pollutants ............................................ 11 Table III-3 Air Quality Monitoring Summary (2015-2017) ....................................... 13 Table III-4 San Joaquin Valley Air Basin Attainment Study ................................... 14 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page iii Rexland Acres - Sewer Expansion Project INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INTRODUCTION 1. Project Title: Rexland Acres – Sewer Expansion Project 2. Lead Agency Name: Kern County Public Works Department Address: 2700 “M” Street, Suite 400 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2323 3. Contact Person: Alexa Kolosky Phone Number: (661) 862-5002 4. Project Location: The community of Rexland Acres is located at the southeast intersection of South Union Avenue and East Pacheco Road, south of Bakersfield, Kern Island Canal on the east, South Union Avenue on the west, and Price Road on the south. The project area is located within a portion of Section 20, T30S, R28E, MDB&M, County of Kern, State of California. The sewage generated by this project area will be delivered to an existing sewer force main installed as part of the original Rexland Acres Sewer Project that will transport the sewage to the Kern Sanitation Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant (KSAWWTP) in Section 3, via Sections 20, 21, 22, 15, 10, and 3 all in T30S, R29E, MDB&M. Refer to Figures 1-1 and 1-4. 5. Project Sponsor’s Kern County Engineering and Survey Services Department Name and Address: 2700 “M” Street, Suite 400, Bakersfield, CA 93301-2323 6. Project Description: Introduction The purpose for installing the original Rexland Acres Sewer System and for implementing the proposed expanded sewer system is that the density of residential development within the project area has resulted in degradation of water qualify due to use of subsurface septic tank and leach lines to manage wastewater generated from individual homes, and collectively, within the project area. Connecting to the area WWTP will remove this area source of groundwater contamination and minimize ongoing future contamination. Refer to Figure 1-1 (Project Location), Figure 1-2 the Alternative 1 Sewer Collection System, and Figure 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3 the Alternative 2 Sewer Collection System. Project Description The proposed project is the construction of additional sewer lines within the rural community of Rexland Acres for collection and delivery of wastewater to the KSAWWTP for treatment and discharge. After comparing Alternatives 1 and 2, addressed in the October 2018 Preliminary Engineering Report (PER, refer to Appendix 1 of his document), the PER recommends implementation of Alternative 1 for the Sewer Expansion Project. Alternative 1 consists of the following specific project components. TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 1 Rexland Acres - Sewer Expansion Project INITIAL STUDY 620 linear feet (LF) of 12" PVC sewer main 16,140 LF of 8" PVC sewer main 182 sewer laterals, assumed to average 75 feet in length (13,650 LF), four (4) inches diameter 43 sewer manholes three (3) sewer clean-outs No land acquisition as all pipelines will be installed in public roads, for which a construction easement may be required repair of roads, including resurfacing of paved areas where required a connection to the existing Rexland Acres sewer system pipeline trenches will vary between 24" and 36", with a maximum depth of twelve (12) feet modification to the existing lift station to increase pumping capacity closure/destruction of the septic tanks assuming 182 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) for this project, average daily flows are estimated to be about 45,500 gallons per day (gpd) based on generation of 250 gallons per day per EDU Funding is being sought from the State Water Resources Control Board to support implementation of this proposed project. It is anticipated that the area shown on Figure 1-2 will be integrated into Kern Sanitation Authority as part of the overall project. 7. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Briefly describe the project’s surroundings) Surrounding land uses include: to the north are single-family residences and agricultural lands; to the east are Kern Island Canal and agricultural uses; to the south are single family residences; to the west is south Union Avenue, single family residential and commercial uses. 8. Other agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) State Water Resources Control Board San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Because the County has existing right-of-way on Union Avenue through this area, it is not anticipated that an encroachment permit will be required from Caltrans. 9. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and cultural affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun? Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Habitat Assessment for California Correctional Institution Solar Project
    Biological Habitat Assessment For California Correctional Institution Solar Project (APN #376-013-02-5) Cummings Mountain 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Section 29, Township 32 S, Range 32 E Tehachapi, Kern County, California Prepared for Forefront Power, LLC 100 Montgomery St., Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Prepared by Report Prepared by Ryan Young Field Work Performed by Mikaila Buchanan Phoenix Biological Consulting PO Box 2238 Tehachapi, CA 93581 (949) 887 0859 cell July 1, 2019 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary: ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction and Purpose: .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Description: ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Location: ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Habitat and Land Use: ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Target Sensitive Species Natural History Description:.................................................................................................. 5 CNDDB Rarefind Database
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page
    BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY FOR WOODVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT’S WATER WELL REPLACEMENT PROJECT ( NEAR WOODVILLE, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ) Prepared for Woodville Public Utility District P.O. Box 4567 16716 Avenue 168 Woodville, CA 93258 (559) 686-9649 September 2019 Prepared by HALSTEAD & ASSOCIATES Environmental / Biological Consultants 296 Burgan Avenue, Clovis, CA 93611 Office (559) 298-2334; Mobile (559) 970-2875 Fax (559) 322-0769; [email protected] Table of Contents Page 1. Summary ..............................................................................................................................1 2. Background ..........................................................................................................................2 3. Project Location ...................................................................................................................2 4. Project Description...............................................................................................................2 5. Project Site Description .......................................................................................................2 6. Regulatory Overview ...........................................................................................................3 7. Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................7 8. Wildlife Resources in the Project Area ................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Strategies and Resulting Patterns in Mate Guarding Crustaceans : an Empirical and Theoretical Approach Matthias Galipaud
    Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans : an empirical and theoretical approach Matthias Galipaud To cite this version: Matthias Galipaud. Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans : an empir- ical and theoretical approach. Reproductive Biology. Université de Bourgogne, 2012. English. NNT : 2012DIJOS111. tel-01124096 HAL Id: tel-01124096 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01124096 Submitted on 6 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Université de Bourgogne UMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences THÈSE Pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université de Bourgogne Discipline : Sciences de la Vie Spécialité : Ecologie Evolutive Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans: an empirical and theoretical approach Matthias Galipaud Directeur de thèse : Loïc Bollache Co-directeur de thèse : François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont Jury Loïc Bollache, Professeur, Université de Bourgogne Directeur Frank Cézilly, Professeur, Université de Bourgogne Examinateur François-Xavier
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for HUD-Funded Proposals Recommended Format Per 24 CFR 58.36, Revised March 2005 [Previously Recommended EA Formats Are Obsolete]
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development San Francisco Regional Office - Region IX 600 Harrison Street San Francisco, California 94107-1387 www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov Environmental Assessment for HUD-funded Proposals Recommended format per 24 CFR 58.36, revised March 2005 [Previously recommended EA formats are obsolete]. Project Identification: Winterhaven Public Safety Facility Preparer: Kevin L. Grant, Ericsson-Grant, Inc. Responsible Entity: County of Imperial Month/Year: February/2017 1 Environmental Assessment Responsible Entity:_County of Imperial___ _____________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(7)] Certifying Officer:_Ralph Cordova, Jr. ___ ______________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(2)] Project Name: Winterhaven Public Safety Facility____________________________________ Project Location: 518 Railroad Avenue, Winterhaven, CA 92281________________________ Estimated total project cost: $2,870,446__________________________________________ Grant Recipient County of Imperial_______________________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(5)] Recipient Address: 940 W. Main Street, Suite 208, El Centro, CA 92243 Project Representative: Esperanza Colio Warren, Community & Economic Development Manager Telephone Number: (442) 265-1100 Conditions for Approval: (List all mitigation measures adopted by the responsible entity to eliminate or minimize adverse environmental impacts. These conditions must be included in project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements). [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1505.2(c)] Mitigation Measure AQ-1: During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, excessive fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by the following techniques: Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph. Limit the simultaneous disturbance area to as small an area as practical when winds exceed 25 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resource Evaluation
    Biological Resource Evaluation Sage Ranch Residential Development Kern County, California PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: City of Tehachapi Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC 21508 Mountain Drive 9493 N Fort Washington Road, Suite 108 Tehachapi, CA 93561 Fresno, CA 93730 August 2019 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ iv 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Location ............................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................................... 4 1.5.1 State Requirements .................................................................................................. 4 1.5.2 Federal Requirements .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 177/Monday
    49022 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 1998 / Rules and Regulations Species Historic range Family Status When listed Critical Special Scientific name Common name habitat rules ******* Poa atropurpurea ..... San Bernardino U.S.A.(CA) .............. PoaceaeÐGrass ..... E 644 NA NA bluegrass. ******* Taraxacum California taraxacum U.S.A.(CA) .............. AsteraceaeÐSun- E 644 NA NA californicum. flower. ******* Trichostema Hidden Lake U.S.A.(CA) .............. LamiaceaeÐMint .... T 644 NA NA austromontanum bluecurls. ssp. compactum. ******* Dated: September 1, 1998. (Rawhide Hill onion), Carpenteria notice for these six taxa concurrently Jamie Rappaport Clark, californica (carpenteria), Fritillaria with this final rule. This final rule Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. striata (Greenhorn adobe lily), Lupinus discusses the final determination to list [FR Doc. 98±24502 Filed 9±11±98; 8:45 am] citrinus var. deflexus (Mariposa lupine), four species as threatened. Robert Hoover (1938) first described BILLING CODE 4310±55±P Mimulus shevockii (Kelso Creek monkeyflower) and Navarretia setiloba Brodiaea pallida based on specimens (Piute Mountain navarretia) is being collected near Chinese Camp in DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR published concurrently with this final Tuolumne County. Brodiaea pallida is rule. an erect, herbaceous perennial plant Fish and Wildlife Service DATES: This rule becomes effective belonging to the lily family (Liliaceae). October 14, 1998. Brodiaea pallida grows from 50 CFR Part 17 underground bulbs to a height of 1 to 3 ADDRESSES: The complete file for this decimeters (dm) (4 to 12 inches (in)), RIN 1018±AC99 rule is available for public inspection, and has long, narrow, thick, succulent by appointment, during normal business Endangered and Threatened Wildlife leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Wolves Botanical Survey Report
    David Magney Environmental Consulting RARE PLANT SURVEY OF THE WIND WOLVES PRESERVE, KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: THE WILDLANDS CONSERVANCY July 2010 DMEC Mission Statement: To provide quality environmental consulting services, with integrity, that protect and enhance the human and natural environment. David Magney Environmental Consulting Rare Plant Survey for the Wind Wolves Preserve, Kern County, California Prepared for: The Wildlands Conservancy 16019 Highway 166, Bakersfield, California 93313 Contact: Dan York, Associate Director Phone: 661/858-1115 Prepared by: David Magney Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 1346, Ojai, California 93024-1346 Contact: David Magney, President Phone: 805/646-6045 Prepared on Behalf of: California State University Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program P.O. Box 9622, Bakersfield, California 93389 Contact: Brian Cypher, Associate Director and Research Ecologist Phone: 661/835-7810 31 July 2010 DMEC Mission Statement: To provide quality environmental consulting services, with integrity, that protect and enhance the human and natural environment. This document should be cited as: David Magney Environmental Consulting. 2010. Rare Plant Survey of the Wind Wolves Preserve, Kern County, California. 31 July 2010. (PN 10-0061.) Ojai, California. Prepared for The Wildlands Conservancy, Maricopa, California, on behalf of the California State University, Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, Bakersfield, California. The Wildlands Conservancy – Rare Plant Survey of the Wind Wolves Preserve
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 177/Monday, September 14, 1998
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 1998 / Proposed Rules 49065 other six plant taxa included in the not substantive evidence that these and the length and shape of perianth proposed rule with A. johnstonii are threats are sufficiently widespread to segments (sepals and petals). discussed in a separate Federal Register pose a significant threat. Some of these Allium tuolumnense is an erect, final rule published concurrently with plants are vulnerable to extirpation from herbaceous perennial of the lily family this withdrawal. random events due to their small (Liliaceae) that grows from underground population size, small numbers of References Cited bulbs. This species has fleshy, green populations, and/or small range but this A list of all references cited herein is entire leaves that reach a height of 25 to vulnerability, in and of itself, is not 50 centimeters (cm) (10 to 20 inches available upon request from the U.S. sufficient justification to warrant their Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish (in)). The loose, 20 to 60 flowered, listing. Therefore, the Service finds that white- or pink-flushed inflorescence and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES the six plant species are not threatened section). appears in late March to early May. with extinction throughout all or a Allium tuolumnense differs from A. Author: The primary author of this significant portion of their ranges in the sanbornii and A. jepsonii in its entire, withdrawal notice is Gary Wallace, foreseeable future and do not meet the spreading perianth segments, fringed Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES definition of threatened or endangered ovarian bumps (processes), and early section).
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Assessment of Insect Diversity at Organic Central Coast Vegetable Farms on Two Spatial Scales
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2013 An Ecological Assessment of Insect Diversity at Organic Central Coast Vegetable Farms on Two Spatial Scales Emily Musgrave San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Musgrave, Emily, "An Ecological Assessment of Insect Diversity at Organic Central Coast Vegetable Farms on Two Spatial Scales" (2013). Master's Theses. 4298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.yw3p-kgs5 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4298 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF INSECT DIVERSITY AT ORGANIC CENTRAL COAST VEGETABLE FARMS ON TWO SPATIAL SCALES A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Environmental Studies San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Emily A. Musgrave May 2013 © 2013 Emily A. Musgrave ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled AN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF INSECT DIVERSITY AT ORGANIC CENTRAL COAST VEGETABLE FARMS ON TWO SPATIAL SCALES by Emily A. Musgrave APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY May 2013 Dr. Rachel O’Malley Department of Environmental Studies Dr. Lynne Trulio Department of Environmental Studies Dr. Deborah Letourneau Department of Environmental Studies University of California, Santa Cruz #$564#%6 AN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF INSECT DIVERSITY AT ORGANIC CENTRAL COAST VEGETABLE FARMS ON TWO SPATIAL SCALES D[Emily A.
    [Show full text]