DOCSLIB.ORG

Vision for Science and Mathematics Education Science Policy Centre Report 01/14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vision for Science and Mathematics Education Science Policy Centre Report 01/14 Vision for science and mathematics and science educationVision for June 2014 The Royal Society The Royal Vision for science and mathematics education Science Policy Centre report 01/14 Science Policy Vision for science and mathematics education The Royal Society Science Policy Centre report 01/14 Issued: June 2014 DES3090 ISBN: 978-1-78252-081-8 © The Royal Society, 2014 The text of this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA. The license is available at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Images are not covered by this license and requests to use them should be submitted to the below address. Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: The Royal Society Science Policy Centre 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG T +44 20 7451 2500 E [email protected] W royalsociety.org This report can be viewed online at royalsociety.org/vision Cover image: ‘Making lightening’ at the Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition, 2012. Exhibit: Listening to Storms and Volcanoes, by the Met Office. Contents Foreword 5 Summary 7 Part one. Education in changing times 15 1.1 The importance of education 16 1.2 The educational and economic importance of science and mathematics 17 1.3 The global focus on improving education 17 1.4 The need for improvement in science and mathematics education 18 1.5 About this report 20 1.6 Building a sound evidence base for policy and practice 22 Part two. Thinking scientifically and mathematically 25 2.1 The importance of being able to think scientifically and mathematically 26 2.2 Nurturing scientific and mathematical thinking 27 2.3 Challenges to developing a scientifically and mathematically informed society 30 Part three. Placing science and mathematics at the heart of education 33 3.1 New baccalaureate-style educational frameworks across the UK 34 3.2 Mathematics education to age 18 37 3.3 Science education to age 18 38 3.3.1 Computing 40 3.3.2 Design and technology 40 3.3.3 Post-16 science 41 3.4 Vocational education and training 42 3.4.1 Apprenticeships 45 3.5 Essentials of science and mathematics education 47 3.5.1 Practical work and problem-solving 47 3.5.2 Interdisciplinary learning 49 3.5.3 New technology to transform science and mathematics education 51 3.5.4 Informal learning and the role of parents 52 3.5.5 Prospective impact of neuroscience and psychological research on learning 55 3.5.6 Work experience and careers guidance 56 3.5.7 Valuing what works 68 3.5.8 How work experience and careers guidance should change 60 3.5.9 The importance of nurturing a positive STEM culture in schools and colleges 60 3.5.10 Leadership for science and mathematics education 62 VISION FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 3 Part four. Quality, coherence and innovation 65 4.1 The value of National Curricula 66 4.2 Stability and innovation in the curriculum for the long term 66 4.3 The role of the STEM community 68 4.4 Subject committees for the sciences and mathematics 70 4.5 New independent curriculum and assessment bodies for England and Wales 71 4.6 Trusting teachers to assess achievement in science and mathematics 72 4.7 Assessing science and mathematics 75 4.8 The relationship between assessment and accountability 76 Part five. Inspirational science and mathematics teaching 83 5.1 Recognising the professionalism of teachers 84 5.2 The supply of science and mathematics teachers 84 5.2.1 Primary science and mathematics teachers 85 5.2.2 Secondary science and mathematics teachers 85 5.3 The importance of subject specialism 85 5.4 Role of the STEM community in improving supply of science and mathematics teachers 87 5.4.1 Initial teacher education and teacher retention 89 5.4.2 Professional development 92 5.4.3 A new college of teaching 97 Part six. Achieving the Vision 99 Part seven. Appendices 101 Appendix 7.1 Membership: Vision for Science and Mathematics Education Committee 102 Appendix 7.2 Methodology of study 104 Appendix 7.3 The Vision Committee’s Terms of Reference 107 Appendix 7.4 Review Panel 108 Appendix 7.5 Acknowledgements 109 Appendix 7.6 Glossary 111 Appendix 7.7 Table: Students numbers in the UK 113 Appendix 7.8 Table: Education systems in the UK 114 Appendix 7.9 Assessment of practical science and mathematics 115 4 VISION FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION SUMMARY Foreword The ability of people to understand The report, a product of a major the world in which they live and programme of work over the past two work increasingly depends on their years, also outlines how the vision can understanding of scientific ideas be achieved. The programme was and associated technologies and led by a committee with a wide span social questions. For most people of expertise, and it was distinguished such understanding will come mainly by its breadth of engagement with through education. This report sets out individuals and groups concerned with the Royal Society’s vision for science science, mathematics, teaching, and and mathematics education over the education systems. next 20 years. It is about how such education can enable people to make The report addresses questions of informed choices, empower them to importance and urgency. I hope you shape scientific and technological will find it thought-provoking and developments, and equip them to compelling. work in an advanced economy. Such outcomes are necessary if the UK is to maintain its position as a world leader in science and engineering and achieve economic growth and to Paul Nurse secure the health and well-being of President of the Royal Society the nation. VISION FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 5 SUMMARY 6 VISION FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION SUMMARY Science and mathematics education for 2030 Science and mathematics are at the There is excellent practice in primary heart of modern life. They are essential to and secondary schools across the UK’s understanding the world and provide the four nations. Our Vision for science and foundations for economic prosperity. mathematics education from 5–18 years of age offers a way to build on these The UK is a world leader in science and foundations. engineering. To maintain and capitalise on this position, the UK needs to strengthen Firstly, in order to ensure young people have its science, technology, engineering and a broad and balanced education through mathematics (STEM) education. to age 18, baccalaureate-style frameworks should be introduced. Inspirational science Our Vision aims to raise the general level and mathematics curricula should be placed of mathematical and scientific knowledge at the heart of these, and should emphasise and confidence in the population. Scientific practical work and problem-solving. The new discovery and technological innovation can frameworks should incorporate subjects in the provide solutions to challenges such as arts, humanities and social sciences and place scarcity of food and water, energy supply and equal value on vocational learning. security and climate change, but they also raise social and ethical dilemmas. All citizens Secondly, education systems need to provide need the skills and knowledge to be able to stability for the curriculum and its assessment make informed decisions about how society in order to support excellent teaching and handles these issues. enable innovation. To achieve this, new, independent, expert bodies that draw on the In addition, our Vision seeks to link people’s wider STEM professional community need to learning and skills to the current and be created in England and Wales to determine future needs of the economy. Science curricula and assessment in STEM subjects. and technology open doors to jobs in Existing infrastructures in Northern Ireland and many sectors where the analytical and Scotland should be similarly supported. problem-solving skills acquired by studying mathematics and science are greatly prized. These skills are vital if the UK is to remain competitive internationally and to ensure that people are productively employed throughout their lives. Left Young person at the Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition, 2012. Exhibit: DNA is not your only destiny; epigenetics behind the scenes. VISION FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 7 SUMMARY Thirdly, many more inspiring teachers will be Our Vision takes the long view but recognises needed. For this to happen, a sustained effort that there is both urgency and great is required to recognise their professionalism opportunity for Governments to act now. and raise their status. To keep up-to-date and There is a persistent dearth of young people maintain a passion for their subject, teachers taking science, technology, engineering and need time and resources to undertake mathematics qualifications after the age of 16 subject-specific professional development, across the UK. Employers report that the skills with this being linked to career progression. and numbers of students leaving education do not fully match their needs. And estimates In order to realise our Vision, we envisage a suggest that one million new science, significant role for the science, technology, engineering and technology professionals – engineering and mathematics professional including technicians – will be required in the community including: UK by 2020.1 • playing a leading role in the proposed This is an exciting and important time in independent expert curriculum and education as countries world-wide recognise assessment bodies; the importance of high-level skills and their impact on economic growth, well- • championing more and better quality being and prosperity. Digital technologies, educational research; cross-disciplinary skills and the age of big data will all have a significant impact in the • supporting excellence in teaching classroom and on teachers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • You and AI Conversations About AI Technologies and Their Implications for Society
    You and AI Conversations about AI technologies and their implications for society SUPPORTED BY CONVERSATIONS ABOUT AI TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIETY DeepMind1 2 CONVERSATIONS ABOUT AI TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIETY You and AI Conversations about AI technologies and their implications for society Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the science of making computer systems smart, and an umbrella term for a range of technologies that carry out functions that typically require intelligence in humans. AI technologies already support many everyday products and services, and the power and reach of these technologies are advancing at pace. The Royal Society is working to support an environment of careful stewardship of AI technologies, so that their benefits can be brought into being safely and rapidly, and shared across society. In support of this aim, the Society’s You and AI series brought together leading AI researchers to contribute to a public conversation about advances in AI and their implications for society. CONVERSATIONS ABOUT AI TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIETY 3 What AI can, and cannot, do The last decade has seen exciting developments in AI – and AI researchers are tackling some fundamental challenges to develop it further AI research seeks to understand what happens or inputs do not follow a standard intelligence is, and then recreate this through pattern, these systems cannot adapt their computer systems that can automatically rules or adjust their approach. perform tasks that require some level of reasoning or intelligence in humans. In the last decade, new methods that use learning algorithms have helped create In the past, AI research has concentrated computer systems that are more flexible on creating detailed rules for how to carry and adaptive, and Demis Hassabis FRS out a task and then developing computer (co-founder, DeepMind) has been at the systems that could carry out these rules; forefront of many of these developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Mathematics Newsletter
    AUTUMN 2011 NEWSLETTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Mathematics NEWS 1 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS NEWS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR It has been another exciting year The positive developments reported in this newsletter stand for our department. The work of in contrast to a backdrop of (global) financial and politi- the faculty has been recognized cal uncertainty. In the fourth year of the financial crisis, in a number of ways, includ- the end is not yet in sight. Repeated cuts in state support, ing the AMS Bôcher Prize and coupled with tuition increases, spell a fundamental shift the SIAM Kleinman Prize pre- in the funding of state universities. At the same time, the sented to Gunther Uhlmann, need to re-tool to pursue new career paths in a changing and the NSF CAREER award to economy, the return of soldiers from overseas deployments, Max Lieblich. As you will see on and the coming of age of the baby-boom echo generation page 15, the numbers of majors bring increasing numbers of students to our campus and to in the Mathematics program and the joint ACMS (Applied our department. and Computational Mathematical Sciences) program have Until the situation settles, new resources are generally made continued to rise, as have the numbers of degrees awarded. available to us in the form of temporary allocations instead In addition, these programs attract outstanding students of tenure-track faculty positions, which would require long- who continue to make us proud. For example, Math majors term financial commitments. This policy is understandable.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Fellows of the Royal Society
    Female Fellows of the Royal Society Professor Jan Anderson FRS [1996] Professor Ruth Lynden-Bell FRS [2006] Professor Judith Armitage FRS [2013] Dr Mary Lyon FRS [1973] Professor Frances Ashcroft FMedSci FRS [1999] Professor Georgina Mace CBE FRS [2002] Professor Gillian Bates FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Trudy Mackay FRS [2006] Professor Jean Beggs CBE FRS [1998] Professor Enid MacRobbie FRS [1991] Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell DBE FRS [2003] Dr Philippa Marrack FMedSci FRS [1997] Dame Valerie Beral DBE FMedSci FRS [2006] Professor Dusa McDuff FRS [1994] Dr Mariann Bienz FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Angela McLean FRS [2009] Professor Elizabeth Blackburn AC FRS [1992] Professor Anne Mills FMedSci FRS [2013] Professor Andrea Brand FMedSci FRS [2010] Professor Brenda Milner CC FRS [1979] Professor Eleanor Burbidge FRS [1964] Dr Anne O'Garra FMedSci FRS [2008] Professor Eleanor Campbell FRS [2010] Dame Bridget Ogilvie AC DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Doreen Cantrell FMedSci FRS [2011] Baroness Onora O'Neill * CBE FBA FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Lorna Casselton CBE FRS [1999] Dame Linda Partridge DBE FMedSci FRS [1996] Professor Deborah Charlesworth FRS [2005] Dr Barbara Pearse FRS [1988] Professor Jennifer Clack FRS [2009] Professor Fiona Powrie FRS [2011] Professor Nicola Clayton FRS [2010] Professor Susan Rees FRS [2002] Professor Suzanne Cory AC FRS [1992] Professor Daniela Rhodes FRS [2007] Dame Kay Davies DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Elizabeth Robertson FRS [2003] Professor Caroline Dean OBE FRS [2004] Dame Carol Robinson DBE FMedSci
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Engineering Fixing the Talent Pipeline
    REPORT WOMEN IN ENGINEERING FIXING THE TALENT PIPELINE Amna Silim and Cait Crosse September 2014 © IPPR 2014 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in September 2014. © 2014 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors’ only. NEW IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................1 Introduction: Why should we care about the lack of women in engineering? .....2 1. The scale of the challenge in the UK .............................................................3 2. The choices girls make in education ..............................................................5 2.1 Choices at school ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 Choices in higher education ............................................................................. 6 2.3 Choices in employment.................................................................................... 7 3. Why do girls reject the idea of a career in engineering?..............................10 3.1 Perception of STEM subjects and engineering careers ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Peter Goldreich Member of the Board of Adjudicators Chairman of the Selection Committee for the Prize in Astronomy
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have recently achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in academic and scientific research or applications, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity’s spiritual civilization. Preference is to be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved and who are currently active in their respective fields. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw. Mr Shaw, born in China in 1907, was a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother’s film company in China in the 1920s. During the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (HK) Limited in Hong Kong. He was one of the founding members of Television Broadcasts Limited launched in Hong Kong in 1967. Mr Shaw also founded two charities, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong and The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive I warmly congratulate the six Shaw Laureates of 2014. Established in 2002 under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw, the Shaw Prize is a highly prestigious recognition of the role that scientists play in shaping the development of a modern world. Since the first award in 2004, 54 leading international scientists have been honoured for their ground-breaking discoveries which have expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and made significant contributions to humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Science
    SPRING 2009 NEWS FROM THE ROYAL SOCIETY INSIDE SCIENCE YOUNG EXPLORERS TOUCHDOWN IN NEW ZEALAND International Expedition Prize is a ‘once in a lifetime experience’ SCIENCE TAKES TO THE STAGE The Royal Shakespeare Company premiers a new play on the emergence of modern science UPDATE FROM THE ROYAL SOCIETY This third issue of Inside Science contains early information DID YOU KNOW? about exciting plans for the Royal Society’s 350th Anniversary in 2010. The Anniversary is a marvellous STEADY FOOTING, opportunity to increase the profile of science, explore its SHAKY BRIDGE benefits and address the challenges it presents for society On its opening day, crowds of but perhaps most important of all to inspire young minds pedestrians experienced unexpected with the excitement of scientific discovery. swaying as they walked across London’s Our policy work continues to address major scientific issues Millennium Bridge. Whilst pedestrians affecting the UK. In December we cautioned the Government on fondly nicknamed it the ‘wobbly bridge’, the levels of separated plutonium stockpiled in the UK – currently physicists were busy exploring the the highest in the world. With support from our Plutonium Working Group, the Society has reasons for the phenomenon. submitted detailed comment to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) for a report to The view was widely held that the Government on management options for the stockpile. ‘wobble’ was due to crowd loading and Late last year we ran an extremely successful MP-Scientist pairing scheme, helping to build pedestrians synchronising their footsteps bridges between parliamentarians and some of the best young scientists in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Officers in Institutions Placed Under the Supervision of the General Board
    2 OFFICERS NUMBER–MICHAELMAS TERM 2009 [SPECIAL NO.7 PART I Chancellor: H.R.H. The Prince PHILIP, Duke of Edinburgh, T Vice-Chancellor: 2003, Prof. ALISON FETTES RICHARD, N, 2010 Deputy Vice-Chancellors for 2009–2010: Dame SANDRA DAWSON, SID,ATHENE DONALD, R,GORDON JOHNSON, W,STUART LAING, CC,DAVID DUNCAN ROBINSON, M,JEREMY KEITH MORRIS SANDERS, SE, SARAH LAETITIA SQUIRE, HH, the Pro-Vice-Chancellors Pro-Vice-Chancellors: 2004, ANDREW DAVID CLIFF, CHR, 31 Dec. 2009 2004, IAN MALCOLM LESLIE, CHR, 31 Dec. 2009 2008, JOHN MARTIN RALLISON, T, 30 Sept. 2011 2004, KATHARINE BRIDGET PRETTY, HO, 31 Dec. 2009 2009, STEPHEN JOHN YOUNG, EM, 31 July 2012 High Steward: 2001, Dame BRIDGET OGILVIE, G Deputy High Steward: 2009, ANNE MARY LONSDALE, NH Commissary: 2002, The Rt Hon. Lord MACKAY OF CLASHFERN, T Proctors for 2009–2010: JEREMY LLOYD CADDICK, EM LINDSAY ANNE YATES, JN Deputy Proctors for MARGARET ANN GUITE, G 2009–2010: PAUL DUNCAN BEATTIE, CC Orator: 2008, RUPERT THOMPSON, SE Registrary: 2007, JONATHAN WILLIAM NICHOLLS, EM Librarian: 2009, ANNE JARVIS, W Acting Deputy Librarian: 2009, SUSANNE MEHRER Director of the Fitzwilliam Museum and Marlay Curator: 2008, TIMOTHY FAULKNER POTTS, CL Director of Development and Alumni Relations: 2002, PETER LAWSON AGAR, SE Esquire Bedells: 2003, NICOLA HARDY, JE 2009, ROGER DERRICK GREEVES, CL University Advocate: 2004, PHILIPPA JANE ROGERSON, CAI, 2010 Deputy University Advocates: 2007, ROSAMUND ELLEN THORNTON, EM, 2010 2006, CHRISTOPHER FORBES FORSYTH, R, 2010 OFFICERS IN INSTITUTIONS PLACED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL BOARD PROFESSORS Accounting 2003 GEOFFREY MEEKS, DAR Active Tectonics 2002 JAMES ANTHONY JACKSON, Q Aeronautical Engineering, Francis Mond 1996 WILLIAM NICHOLAS DAWES, CHU Aerothermal Technology 2000 HOWARD PETER HODSON, G Algebra 2003 JAN SAXL, CAI Algebraic Geometry (2000) 2000 NICHOLAS IAN SHEPHERD-BARRON, T Algebraic Geometry (2001) 2001 PELHAM MARK HEDLEY WILSON, T American History, Paul Mellon 1992 ANTHONY JOHN BADGER, CL American History and Institutions, Pitt 2009 NANCY A.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Society, 1985
    The Public Understanding of Science Report of a Royal Society adhoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SWlY 5AG CONTENTS Page Preface 5 Summary 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Why it matters 9 3. The present position 12 4. Formal education 17 5. The mass media 2 1 6. ' The scientific community 24 7. Public lectures, children's activities, museums and libraries 27 8. Industry 29 9. Conclusions and recommendations 31 Annexes A. List of those submitting evidence B. Visits and seminars C. Selected bibliography PREFACE This report was prepared by an ad hoc group under the chairmanship of Dr W.F. Bodmer, F.R.S.; it has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. It deals with an issue that is important not only, or even mainly, for the scientific community but also for the nation as a whole and for each individual within it. More than ever, people need some understanding of science, whether they are involved in decision-making at a national or local level, in managing industrial companies, in skilled or semi-skilled employment, in voting as private citizens or in making a wide range of personal decisions. In publishing this report the Council hopes that it will highlight this need for an overall awareness of the nature of science and, more particularly, of the way that science and technology pervade modern life, and that it will generate both debate and decisions on how best they can be fostered. The report makes a number of recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Physics Review
    The Blackett Laboratory Department of Physics Review Faculty of Natural Sciences 2008/09 Contents Preface from the Head of Department 2 Undergraduate Teaching 54 Academic Staff group photograph 9 Postgraduate Studies 59 General Departmental Information 10 PhD degrees awarded (by research group) 61 Research Groups 11 Research Grants Grants obtained by research group 64 Astrophysics 12 Technical Development, Intellectual Property 69 and Commercial Interactions (by research group) Condensed Matter Theory 17 Academic Staff 72 Experimental Solid State 20 Administrative and Support Staff 76 High Energy Physics 25 Optics - Laser Consortium 30 Optics - Photonics 33 Optics - Quantum Optics and Laser Science 41 Plasma Physics 38 Space and Atmospheric Physics 45 Theoretical Physics 49 Front cover: Laser probing images of jet propagating in ambient plasma and a density map from a 3D simulation of a nested, stainless steel, wire array experiment - see Plamsa Physics group page 38. 1 Preface from the Heads of Department During 2008 much of the headline were invited by, Ian Pearson MP, the within the IOP Juno code of practice grabbing news focused on ‘big science’ Minister of State for Science and (available to download at with serious financial problems at the Innovation, to initiate a broad ranging www.ioppublishing.com/activity/diver Science and Technology Facilities review of physics research under sity/Gender/Juno_code_of_practice/ Council (STFC) (we note that some the chairmanship of Professor Bill page_31619.html). As noted in the 40% of the Department’s research Wakeham (Vice-Chancellor of IOP document, “The code … sets expenditure is STFC derived) and Southampton University). The stated out practical ideas for actions that the start-up of the Large Hadron purpose of the review was to examine departments can take to address the Collider at CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry for All Reducing Inequalities in Chemistry Aspirations and Attitudes
    Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Institute of Education 2 Chemistry for All Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes Findings from the Chemistry for All research and evaluation programme November 2020 Authors Dr Tamjid Mujtaba Dr Richard Sheldrake Professor Michael J. Reiss UCL Institute of Education, University College London Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the students and staff from across the participating schools. The authors would also like to thank the Chemistry for All programme delivery teams and members of the programme steering group. The research was conducted independently by the UCL Institute of Education with funding from the Royal Society of Chemistry. For further information For further information on the Chemistry for All project, including requests for related publications or the next phase of the work, please contact Dr Tamjid Mujtaba ([email protected]). 3 1. Executive summary 5 9.3. Results for science as of Year 11 82 1.1. Background and context 6 9.3.1. Predicting students’ science aspirations 1.2. Chemistry for All programme 7 (A-Level, university, jobs) as of Year 11 82 1.3. Research and evaluation programme 7 9.3.2. Predicting students’ science aspirations for A-Level as of Year 11 85 CONTENTS 1.4. Research results and insights 8 1.4.1. Insights into students’ changing attitudes and aspirations 8 9.3.3. Predicting students’ science aspirations for careers as of Year 11 86 1.4.2. Insights into students’ attitudes and views 9 9.3.4. Predicting students’ science aspirations for university 1.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Crystalline Polymers: Second Edition A
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-58001-4 - Liquid Crystalline Polymers: Second Edition A. M. Donald, A. H. Windle, and S. Hanna Frontmatter More information LIQUID CRYSTALLINE POLYMERS SECOND EDITION The new edition of this authoritative guide on liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) science has been produced in response to the wealth of new material recently generated in the field. It takes the reader through the theoretical underpinnings to real-world applications of LCP technology in a logical, well-integrated manner. A chapter on liquid crystalline biopolymers has been introduced, whilst the in-depth discussion on applications describes not only maturing fields of high strength structural LCPs, but also a detailed analysis of the developing area of functional materials. The in-depth coverage and detailed glossary establish this as an indispensable text for graduate students and researchers in the polymer field, as well as being of interest to those working in chemistry, physics and materials science. A THENE D ONALD became Professor of Experimental Physics at the University of Cambridge in 1998 after many years as a lecturer and then reader. She was elected as Fellow of the Royal Society in 1999. She is the author of over 200 papers in the general field of soft matter physics, with interests spanning from synthetic to biologically relevant polymers. A LAN W INDLE is Professor of Materials Science at the University of Cambridge, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and Fellow of the Royal Society. He is the author of around 200 papers on polymer structure, LCPs and carbon nanotubes. He has previously held positions as head of the Materials Science department in Cambridge and director of the Cambridge MIT Institute.
    [Show full text]