The Bone People As Postcolonial Gothic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A haunted and homesick nation Keri Hulme’s The Bone People as Postcolonial Gothic Josefine Vassjø Master’s thesis in Comparative Literature Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages Faculty of Humanities UNIVERSITY OF OSLO May 2018 II A haunted and homesick nation Keri Hulme’s The Bone People as Postcolonial Gothic Josefine Vassjø III IV © Josefine Vassjø 2018 A haunted and homesick nation: Keri Hulme’s The Bone People as Postcolonial Gothic Josefine Vassjø http://www.duo.uio.no Print: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo V VI Abstract This thesis explores the ways in which Keri Hulme, in her novel The Bone People, depicts New Zealand as a nation haunted by its repressed colonial past, causing it to suffer from homesickness. This unhomeliness is shown in the architecture of society as well as in the body of the individual, particularly in that of the indigene. The novel illustrates how the effects of colonial abuse prevails, inhibiting the Maori population of New Zealand to feel at home in the nation. My argument is that by utilising the mode of the Gothic uncanny, Hulme reveals how the local and national home have become unhomely, shedding light on the brutal violence hidden within familiar constructions, and furthermore, delineates how to decolonise these structures in order to make the nation homely; thus The Bone People may be read as a Postcolonial Gothic narrative. VII VIII Acknowledgements I would like to give my warmest thanks to my supervisor Tone Selboe, for her guidance and encouragement, and for all the engaging conversations. Her insights and many assurances have been invaluable to me during the process of birthing this thesis. I would also like to thank my dear friend Hanna Giæver for reading through my drafts and giving me her shrewd feedback. Furthermore, thanks to the other members of Supperådet for support and encouragement in these trying times––I am looking forward to resuming our adventures now that I have been set free. Also, my endless gratitude to the McElroy family for keeping me as sane as possible, making me laugh when I probably would have been crying instead. IX X Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 1 Theoretical framework .............................................................................................. 10 1.1 The uncanny .................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 The postcolonial Gothic ................................................................................................ 15 1.3 The monster, the other ................................................................................................... 17 2 Unhomely homes .................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Kerewin’s Tower ........................................................................................................... 20 2.2 The Gillayley house ....................................................................................................... 23 2.3 The ghost of violence .................................................................................................... 26 2.4 “… but it’s a bloody kind of love that has violence as a silent partner” ...................... 28 2.5 Structuring and restructuring ......................................................................................... 29 2.6 A visionary architect ..................................................................................................... 32 2.7 The murderous and the domestic ................................................................................... 37 3 Monstrous others .................................................................................................... 44 3.1 Simon, the stranger ........................................................................................................ 44 3.2 The agency of the child, the agency of the monster ...................................................... 45 3.3 The disabled child ......................................................................................................... 49 3.4 Disability as social ability ............................................................................................. 51 3.5 Kerewin, the abhuman ................................................................................................... 52 3.6 Monstrous liminality ..................................................................................................... 54 3.7 “Obfuscation is my trade” ............................................................................................. 56 3.8 The compromised identity of the indigene: the hunting of the snark ............................ 57 3.9 Mirrortalk ...................................................................................................................... 59 3.10 A case of self-haunting ................................................................................................ 61 3.11 “But what to call that sport, the neuter human?” ........................................................ 63 3.12 The horrific re-making of the human subject .............................................................. 67 4 The structuring spiral ............................................................................................ 70 4.1 The spiral as a home, the novel as a home .................................................................... 70 4.2 The spiral as time and history ........................................................................................ 74 4.3 Time and the indigene ................................................................................................... 77 4.4 A consideration of Gothic inversion ............................................................................. 79 Concluding remarks ..................................................................................................... 82 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 84 XI 1 Introduction The Bone People by Keri Hulme is a novel that has garnered much critical attention since its publication in 1984, particularly within postcolonial and world literature studies. However, the road to its publication was not an easy one, as Hulme was rejected by several publishers, one of them stating that, “[u]ndoubtedly Miss Hulme can write but unfortunately we don't understand what she is writing about.”1 It was, presumably, Hulme’s unusual prose and strange subject matter that was the objection among sundry publishers. Finally, the small feminist publishing house Spiral Collective took Hulme on, and The Bone People went on to win the prestigious Booker prize a year later, after having received both the New Zealand Book Award for Fiction and the Pegasus Award for Maori Literature. These prizes are a testament to the novel’s success and its popularity, both in New Zealand and worldwide. It has been suggested that its fame in New Zealand stems from The Bone People’s representation of a unified New Zealand, and its mitigating effect on what seems to be a fraught society, with its history of violent and structural oppression and exploitation of the indigenous Maori population before and after the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, which saw New Zealand as an official colony of the British Crown.2 The way The Bone People was heralded as The New Zealand Novel in the 1980s was telling in that it showed the apparent lack of Kiwi fiction able to satisfactorily capture and represent New Zealand life. For a young country like New Zealand, with its fragile and insecure identity,3 it is perhaps not so strange that New Zealanders would latch on to Hulme’s novel, despite its rather troubling content. One of the novel’s most alluring aspects, perhaps, is how it appears to reconcile and unite Pakeha (white European culture) and Maori culture, even when this unification is presented as something quite brutal and not at all harmonious. As Erin Mercer points out, “[t]he ecstatic reception of Keri Hulme's 1984 Booker Prize winning novel the bone people is inextricably linked to its interpretation as a fundamentally New Zealand novel capable of creating a new national identity in bicultural terms.”4 Presumably, this wish for a new national identity made it easier for readers to look past all the violence in the novel, allowing critics to interpret it as 1 Jim Weir, Strong language: very quotable New Zealand quotes. (Auckland: New Holland Publishers, 22 Claudia Orange, The Treaty of Waitangi. (Wellington: Bridget Williams Books Ltd., 1997, c1987), 85 3 Ian Conrich, “New Zealand Gothic,” in A New Companion to the Gothic, ed. David Punter (Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: 2012), 397 4 Erin Mercer. ”'Frae ghosties an ghoulies deliver us': Keri Hulme's the bone people and the Bicultural Gothic,” in i Journal of New Zealand Literature. (JNZL, No. 27: 2009), 111 2 a “novel of healing.”5 Even though it may be interpreted as such––this paper also argues for the restorative impulses of the novel––the way in which the violence was addressed or, indeed, not addressed is troubling. However, the optimistic conclusion of the novel has been met with some resistance; Antje M. Rauwerda, for example, is of the opinion that the reconciliation depicted ”is a Maori one that includes Pakeha only to