AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN 16Th – 31St January 2019 Edition No: 002 ABOUT AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN 16Th – 31St January 2019 Edition No: 002 ABOUT AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA اﻻتحاد اﻻفريقي ACSRT/CAERT African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism Centre Africain d’Etudes et de Recherche sur le Terrorisme AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN 16th – 31st January 2019 Edition No: 002 ABOUT AFRICA TERRORISM BULLETIN As part of its mandate to help build Counter Terrorism capacity of African Union Member States, and keep African Counter Terrorism Practitioners abreast with current trends of terrorism in Africa, the African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism (ACSRT) has developed tools that allow it to collect, analyze and disseminate terrorism related incidents in Africa. The information gathering, processing and data analysis allow the ACSRT to provide Member States and P/CVE Practitioners with relevant information on trends and development of terrorism in Africa. The ACSRT disseminates its analysis of data collected on terrorism incidents through various productions. The Africa Terrorism Bulletin, a fortnightly compilation and data analysis is to form the basis for an African Terrorism Trend Analysis to be published by the Centre quarterly. THE BULLETIN IS PRODUCED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF H.E. Larry GBEVLO-LARTEY Esq., AU Special Representative for Counter Terrorism Cooperation / Director ACSRT RESEARCHERS Mr. Aristide IGIRANEZA, ACSRT Mr. Richard APAU, ACSRT Mr. Joseph Kiéba TINDANO, ACSRT REVIEWERS Dr. Fiifi EDU-AFFUL, KAIPTC Dr. Festus Kofi AUBYN, KAIPTC Mr. Idriss Mounir LALLALI, ACSRT Col. Christian Emmanuel MOUAYA POUYI, ACSRT Mr. Inusah ZIBLIM, ACSRT Mr. Adjewoda KUTOATI, ACSRT El Waled Elamir Mohamed, ACSRT © African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism (ACSRT) 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE 1 Title Page 1 2 Table of Content 2 3 Executive Summary 3 4 Terrorism in Africa: Issue of Definition 4 5 Introduction 4 6 Threats Update 5 7 General Trend: Terrorism Incidents/CT Response 6 8 Total Number of Terrorist Attacks 6 9 Attacks by Region 7 10 Means of Attacks 7 11 Terrorist Groups and their Means of Attack 8 12 Primary Targets 9 13 Terrorist Groups and their Primary Targets 9 14 Total Terrorism Related Deaths 10 15 Deaths by Region 12 16 Deaths by Means of Attack 13 17 Attacks/Victims by Terrorist Groups 13 18 Members of Terrorist Groups Killed 15 19 Areas with High Recorded Incidents 16 20 Most Fatal Terrorism Incidents 17 21 In Focus: The Sahel Region 17 22 Total Attacks in the Sahel 18 23 Means of Attacks in the Sahel 18 24 Total Deaths in the Sahel 19 25 Deaths By Category in the Sahel 20 26 Synthesis Table of Terrorism Incidents 21 27 Synthesis Table of Terrorist Groups Activities 22 28 Record of Terrorism Incidents by Regions 23 29 Central Africa 23 30 East Africa 24 31 North Africa 27 32 Southern Africa 28 33 West Africa 29 34 Terrorism Related News 33 35 Conclusion 34 36 About the ACSRT 35 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY QUICK HIGHLIGHTS Al-Shabaab lost 107 members during CT operations. Other IS affiliates (in Sinai, Egypt) th st The period under review (16 -31 on the other hand, lost 75 members in CT January 2019) recorded a total of 59 operations. Boko Haram, ISWAP and JNIM, terrorists’ attacks, 1 clash between lost 6, 5 and 3 of their members to CT terrorist groups and a total of 555 operations respectively. 111 others killed by terrorism related deaths. counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency belong to unidentified/ unaffiliated groups. Out of the 555 terrorism related deaths, 283 resulted directly from terrorist Five countries most affected by terrorism attacks, whereas 272 were deaths during the period are Mali, Somalia, Nigeria, recorded during counter terrorism Burkina Faso, and Niger. (In decreasing operation by security forces. order). 55% (307) of the casualties were The Sahel region recorded 37 out of 59 members of terrorists groups. Security incidents of terrorist attacks, and a total deaths forces and Civilian casualties were 25% of 253 out of 555 representing 46% of the (140) and 20% (108) respectively. terrorism related deaths for the period. Out of the 253, 94 terrorists, 83 civilians and 76 In 35 out of the 59 attacks, the terrorists security and military personnel died in the used Small Arms and Light Weapons Sahel region. (SALW). 18 attacks involved the use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), 4 More civilians (77%) and military forces (54%) kidnappings for ransom and 2 mixed died in the Sahel than the rest of Africa. 31% (SALW & IEDs). of terrorists were killed in the Sahel as against 69% in the rest of Africa. Al-Shabaab and Jama’a Nusrat ul-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) used IEDs more RECENT HIGH PROFILE INCIDENTS in their attacks than SALW. All attacks Recent high profile attacks include: by Boko Haram and Ansarul Islam used - The 16th January 2019 armed men attack on SALW. two villages in Menaka (Mali) in which 34 Tuareg civilians were killed. 22 of the attacks targeted civilians, 22 - The 27th January 2019 suspected armed men targeted security forces, 8 targeted from Anasrul Islam attack in Sikire, Soum International Organizations (MINUSMA (Burkina Faso) in which 10 civilians were and AMISOM), and 7 targeted killed and 2 injured. Government Institutions and Officials. th - The 20 January 2019 JNIM attacked on MINUSMA camp in Arguelhok, Kidal (Mali) All attacks by Boko Haran (Islamic State killing 10 Soldiers of Chadian nationalities in West Africa Province (ISWAP) and injuring 25. faction) and Ansarul Islam targeted Security/Military forces. Majority of Al- Security forces have remained responsive to the Shabaab and JNIM attacks targeted situation. Counter -Terrorism Operations have been Security forces and international significant in January 2019. 305 members of terrorist organization (MINUSMA and AMISOM groups have been killed in CT Operations. These troops), Boko Haram (Shekau faction) include 75 suspected terrorists killed in Sinai targeted civilians most in their attacks. Peninsula between 19th and 27th January 2019. In Somalia, 73 al-Shabaab members were killed in Bar- Al-Shabaab killed 56 (54 military), th ISWAP killed 51 (all military), Ansarul Sanguni, Juba on 19 January 2019. Similarly, the Islam killed 5 (all military), Other IS Nigeria Armed Forces killed 58 armed bandits in th Affiliates killed 7 (all military) and Boko Zamfara on 20 January 2019. Haram killed 8 (all civilians). 3 TERRORISM IN AFRICA: ISSUE OF DEFINITION Notwithstanding the lack of a universal definition of terrorism, article 1 paragraph 3, (a) and (b) and article 3 of the African Union in its 1999 CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND COMBATING OF TERRORISM, defines what constitutes a Terrorist Act. The African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism (ACSRT) and therefore this Africa Terrorism Bulletin defers to this definition. INTRODUCTION The objective of the Africa Terrorism Bulletin is to provide a fortnight assessment of terrorism and violent extremism situation and trends on the continent. This is aimed at providing African Union Member States up to date information on terrorism incidents and its related activities. The data for the analysis of this Bulletin, is limited to information stored in the ACSRT Database, collected in conformity with the definition of terrorist acts as defined by the 1999 OAU Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism. The ACSRT maintains a robust database that stores information on terrorism, more specifically, on terrorist groups and individuals, terrorist activities and related scourges, and avail this information to the African Union Commission and the African Union Member States. The information for the Database is collected by the ACSRT Situation Room Team using the Africa Media Monitor (AMM) developed in collaboration with the European Union Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) for advanced web mining and information extraction. By dint of the AMM, the Situation Room Team scans and accesses over 1400 websites 7/24 and retrieves real time information on terrorist incidents in the four official AU languages (English, French, Arabic and Portuguese). The Centre also stores terrorism related information received from Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and Regional Mechanisms (RMs) based on existing cooperation, in addition to information received through the AU Continental Early Warning Situation-Room as well as reports from AU Field Missions. To ensure validity and reliability of the data stored in the database, the Centre verifies all terrorism incidents retrieved by means of the AMM, RECs and RMs from the ACSRT Focal Points of the Member States. The Focal Points are the official representatives appointed by each of the 55 Member States to collaborate and share information on terrorism and related activities with the ACSRT. As a mandated body of the African Union, the information provided by the Member States on terrorism regarding the number of attacks, deaths and injuries recorded and as verified by the Focal Points are considered the right number and official data for the ACSRT Database irrespective of any conflicting number from other sources. 4 THREAT UPDATE Terrorism and Violent Extremism remain significant threats to international peace and security. Although no country is immune to these threats, Africa has been particularly susceptible. Weak institutions, porous borders, inadequately trained or ill-equipped security forces, historical grievances and lack of economic opportunities have created conditions for terrorism and violent extremism to grow and fester in parts of the continent. Acts of terrorism and violent extremism, have emerged as major threats to peace, security, stability and development on the continent of Africa. West Africa and the Sahel regions have become home to terrorist groups in recent times such that numerous protracted atrocities have been committed against innocent civilians, security forces, international organizations and government agencies by the various terrorist groups.
Recommended publications
  • Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives
    Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives ALASDAIR MCKAY, ABIGAIL WATSON & MEGAN KARLSHØJ-PEDERSEN This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives EDITED BY ALASDAIR MCKAY, ABIGAIL WATSON AND MEGAN KARLSHØJ-PEDERSEN ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2021 ISBN 978-1-910814-56-7 This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/scholarly use. Production: Michael Tang Cover Image: Ruslan Shugushev/Shutterstock A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • LET4CAP Law Enforcement Training for Capacity Building NIGER
    Co-funded by the Internal Security Fund of the European Union LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING FOR CAPACITY BUILDING LET4CAP Law Enforcement Training for Capacity Building NIGER Downloadable Country Booklet DL. 2.5 (Ve 1.2) Dissemination level: PU Let4Cap Grant Contract no.: HOME/ 2015/ISFP/AG/LETX/8753 Start date: 01/11/2016 Duration: 33 months Dissemination Level PU: Public X PP: Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission) RE: Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission) Revision history Rev. Date Author Notes 1.0 20/03/2018 SSSA Overall structure and first draft 1.1 06/05/2018 SSSA Second version after internal feedback among SSSA staff 1.2 09/05/2018 SSSA Final version version before feedback from partners LET4CAP_WorkpackageNumber 2 Deliverable_2.5 VER1.2 WorkpackageNumber 2 Deliverable Deliverable 2.5 Downloadable country booklets VER V. 1 . 2 2 NIGER Country Information Package 3 This Country Information Package has been prepared by Eric REPETTO and Claudia KNERING, under the scientific supervision of Professor Andrea de GUTTRY and Dr. Annalisa CRETA. Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy www.santannapisa.it LET4CAP, co-funded by the Internal Security Fund of the European Union, aims to contribute to more consistent and efficient assistance in law enforcement capacity building to third countries. The Project consists in the design and provision of training interventions drawn on the experience of the partners and fine-tuned after a piloting and consolidation phase. © 2018 by LET4CAP All rights reserved. 4 Table of contents 1. Country Profile 1.1Country in Brief 1.2Modern and Contemporary History of Niger 1.3 Geography 1.4Territorial and Administrative Units 1.5 Population 1.6Ethnic Groups, Languages, Religion 1.7Health 1.8Education and Literacy 1.9Country Economy 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 254 the Social Roots of Jihadist Violence in Burkina Fasos North
    The Social Roots of Jihadist Violence in Burkina Faso’s North Africa Report N°254 | 12 October 2017 Translation from French Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 The Social Roots of the Crisis ........................................................................................... 3 A. Malam Ibrahim Dicko, from the Radio to Jihad ....................................................... 3 B. The Challenge to an Ossified and Unequal Social Order .......................................... 4 C. A Distant Relationship with the Government ........................................................... 7 D. An Especially Vulnerable Province on the Border with Mali .................................... 9 A Considerable Military Effort ......................................................................................... 11 A. The Sahel Region under Threat ................................................................................. 11 B. A Security Apparatus under Reconstruction ............................................................. 13 C. Regional and International Cooperation ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Framework for US Policy in the Sahel
    Marcellus POLICY ANALYSIS Spring 2021 - Marcellus Policy Analysis No. 1 A New Framework for U.S. Policy in the Sahel by John Ramming Chappell EXECUTIVE SUMMARY merican foreign policy in the Sahel has not worked. Counterterrorism has pre- dominated in the U.S. approach to the region since 2001, resulting in a policy focused on security assistance and military cooperation. However, the influ- ence of Salafi-jihadist groups in the region has markedly increased, civilian Afatalities have skyrocketed, and a militarized approach has undermined security sector governance. U.S. strategy has not adequately addressed the root causes of conflict—po- litical marginalization, poverty, and environmental pressures—that have contributed to a vicious cycle of conflict and fragility. The challenges facing the Sahel call for a new ap- proach. To effect lasting change in the Sahel, the United States needs to replace the overmilita- rized status quo with an affirmative strategy of diplomatic engagement.The United States should reduce military engagement in the Sahel, which is disproportionate to relatively limited interests. However, withdrawal alone would be insufficient to shift regional -dy namics because other stakeholders would continue counterterrorism campaigns based on the American model. Therefore, the Biden administration should implement the Global Fragility Strategy in the Sahel and phase out the Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership to right the bal- ance between diplomatic and military tools. The United States should work with regional stakeholders to coordinate a broader shift in its Sahel policy. 1 The Status Quo Approach to the Initiatives Such as the TSCTP and Sahel Has Failed AFRICOM Have Failed to Curb Militancy The Sahel is a semi-arid strip of grassland stretching The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sahel Blog Translation Projects, Number 1 October 2020 An
    Sahel Blog Translation Projects, Number 1 October 2020 An Annotated Translation of the Islamic State’s “Liptako: Graveyard of Crusaders and Apostates” Alex Thurston Translator’s Introduction The Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS) is a key armed actor in the tri-border zone between Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso.1 ISGS is the central counterterrorism target for those governments and especially for France, and the tri-border zone has become the key priority for France’s Sahel-focused counterterrorism mission, Operation Barkhane. That zone is also the priority for the French-backed G5 Sahel Joint Force, which draws soldiers from Mauritania and Chad in addition to the three countries that make up the tri-border zone.2 The Joint Force was created in 2017.3 ISGS emerged out of a May 2015 rupture within al-Murabitun, itself a breakaway faction of al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).4 ISGS’ leader, Adnan Abu Walid al-Sahrawi, pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. Over time, his unit has gained more recognition from the Islamic State central leadership, which labels ISGS a part of the “Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP).” At the international level, ISGS is most famous for its October 2017 ambush on a joint American-Nigerien patrol outside the Nigerien village of Tongo- Tongo.5 1 For background on the violence in the tri-border zone, see William Assanvo, Baba Dakono, Lori-Anne Théroux- Bénoni and Ibrahim Maïga, “Violent extremism, Organised Crime and Local Conflicts in Liptako-Gourma,” Institute for Security Studies, December 2019, https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/war-26-eng.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transmutation of Jihadi Organizations in the Sahel and the Regional Security Architecture
    No. 10, April 2018 FUTURE NOTES THE TRANSMUTATION OF JIHADI ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SAHEL AND THE REGIONAL SECURITY ARCHITECTURE Djallil Lounnas This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement No 693244 Middle East and North Africa Regional Architecture: Mapping Geopolitical Shifts, regional Order and Domestic Transformations FUTURE NOTES No. 10, April 2018 THE TRANSMUTATION OF JIHADI ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SAHEL AND THE REGIONAL SECURITY ARCHITECTURE Djallil Lounnas1 In March 2017, the four most powerful jihadi organizations in the Sahel, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Ansar al-Din, Al-Mourabitoun and Katibat Macina – the latter three linked directly or indirectly to Al-Qaeda – announced their unification and the creation of the Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin’ (JNIM) also known as Group in Support of Islam and Muslims (GSIM), under the leadership of Iyad Ag Ghali. This unification ended the factionalism that had long characterized jihadi organizations in the region and gave birth to what can be considered as one of the most powerful Al-Qaeda affiliates. The creation of the GSIM is especially dangerous in view of the fact that the Sahelian sub-regional system is composed of weak states unable to quell the jihadi threat and geographically linked to Libya, a collapsed state and considered a safe haven for jihadi organizations, in spite of the presence of the international community, especially the French military operation Barkhane. Even more dangerous is the presence of an affiliate of the Islamic State, the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS) led by Abu Walid al-Sahrawi, an organization which, although on the surface appearing to be the main rival of the GSIM, has been following a strategy of rapprochement with Iyad Ag Ghali.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Terrorism 2019
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2019 BUREAU OF COUNTERTERRORISM Country Reports on Terrorism 2019 is submitted in compliance with Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f (the “Act”), which requires the Department of State to provide to Congress a full and complete annual report on terrorism for those countries and groups meeting the criteria of the Act. Foreword In 2019, the United States and our partners made major strides to defeat and degrade international terrorist organizations. Along with the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, in March, the United States completed the destruction of the so-called “caliphate” in Iraq and Syria. In October, the United States launched a military operation that resulted in the death of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the self-proclaimed “caliph” of ISIS. As part of the maximum pressure campaign against the Iranian regime – the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism – the United States and our partners imposed new sanctions on Tehran and its proxies. In April, the United States designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including its Qods Force, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) – the first time such a designation has been applied to part of another government. And throughout the year, a number of countries in Western Europe and South America joined the United States in designating Iran-backed Hizballah as a terrorist group in its entirety. Despite these successes, dangerous terrorist threats persisted around the world. Even as ISIS lost its leader and territory, the group adapted to continue the fight from its affiliates across the globe and by inspiring followers to commit attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in Marginalized African Societies∗
    NATION-STATE OR NATION-FAMILY?NATIONALISM IN MARGINALIZED AFRICAN SOCIETIES∗ Forthcoming in the Journal of Modern African Studies Abhit Bhandariy Lisa Muellerz December 26, 2018 Scholars have long puzzled over strong nationalism in weak African states. Existing theories suggest that a) incumbent leaders use nationalistic appeals to distract people from state weak- ness; or b) citizens use nationalistic claims to exclude rival groups from accessing patronage and public goods. But what explains robust nationalism in places where politicians seldom visit and where the state under-provides resources, as is true across much of Africa? We pro- pose a theory of familial nationalism, arguing that people profess attachment to a nation-family instead of to a nation-state under conditions where the family, and not the state, is the main lifeline. We substantiate it using surveys from the border between Niger and Burkina Faso, where an international court ruling allowed people to choose their citizenship, thus providing a test for nationalism in marginalized communities. We supplement the border data with surveys and focus groups from the capitals of both countries. ∗For invaluable research assistance and data collection we thank Thierno Mamadou Sow, Bachirou Ayouba Tinni, and Adam Malah. We thank Amadou Tankoana for insight on his role in the ICJ border dispute case and Issa Abdou Yonlihinza for his input on mining in western Niger. For helpful comments we thank seminar participants at ASA, APSA, Northwestern, and WGAPE. The DeWitt Wallace Fund provided generous fieldwork funding. This project was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Macalester College and Columbia University (IRB-AAAQ5013).
    [Show full text]
  • Penempatan Pasukan Amerika Serikat Di Niger Sebagai Bagian Dari Kebijakan Global War on Terror Tahun 2013 - 2017
    PENEMPATAN PASUKAN AMERIKA SERIKAT DI NIGER SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI KEBIJAKAN GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR TAHUN 2013 - 2017 Dewa Made Nanda Wijaya1), D.A. Wiwik Dharmiasih2), A.A. Bagus Surya Widya Nugraha3) 123)Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Udayana Email: [email protected]), [email protected]),[email protected]) ABSTRACT United States as the victim of 9/11 tragedy launch the Global War on Terror to combat global terrorism and to secure its national security. Sahel as a region passed by the Sahara Dessert is becoming a place to hide, recruit, financing and training camp for global terrorist network. The rise of terrorist network in the Sahel cannot be separated from Sahel States condition which been categorized as least developed countries. To counter the rise of terrorist threat in the Sahel Region. United States deploy its military forces in Niger. This research analyzes and describe the objective of United States military deployment in Niger, especially from 2013 until 2017. This research used security and counterterrorism framework to explain the objective of United States military deployment in Niger. Methodology that used in this research is qualitative-descriptive. Data in this research were gathers from multiple sources such as book, journal, and government reports that related with this research. Keywords: United States of America, Niger, Security Cooperation, Counterterrorism. 1. PENDAHULUAN sebagai ancaman fundamental bagi stabilitas Amerika Serikat merupakan negara keamanan nasional dan internasional (Bush yang mengalami serangan terorisme dalam White House, 2003). Untuk menghancurkan Tragedi 9/11. Serangan tersebut ditujukan dan meminimalisir potensi ancaman, GWOT terhadap simbol ekonomi dan militer Amerika menekankan pada tindakan militer terhadap Serikat, yaitu gedung kembar World Trade jaringan kelompok teroris transnasional, Center (WTC) dan Pentagon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Varied Effects of Military Intervention on Public Schooling in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso
    Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Honors Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2021 Education Amid Stabilization: The Varied Effects of Military Intervention on Public Schooling in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso Arjun S. Mehta Bowdoin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects Part of the African Studies Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Mehta, Arjun S., "Education Amid Stabilization: The Varied Effects of Military Intervention on Public Schooling in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso" (2021). Honors Projects. 268. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/268 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Education Amid Stabilization The Varied Effects of Military Intervention on Public Schooling in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso An honors paper for the Department of Government and Legal Studies By Arjun S. Mehta Bowdoin College, 2021 © 2021 Arjun S. Mehta Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Abstract iv List of Tables, Figures, and Maps v List of Abbreviations vi Chapter I: Introduction & Literature Review 1 Hypothesis and Methodology 4 Research Questions 6 Structure of
    [Show full text]
  • Burkina Faso
    Burkina Faso: June – October 2018 Chronology of Violent Incidents Related to Al-Qaeda affiliates Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimeen (JNIM) and Ansaroul Islam, and Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS) November 1st , 2018 By Rida Lyammouri Disclaimer: This report was compiled from open-source documents, social media, news reports, and local participants. 2016-2018 Sahel MeMo LLC All Rights Reserved. Burkina Faso: June – October 2018 Takeaways and Trends • Militants activity in Burkina Faso have been on the rise for the past two years. Since June 2018 Sahel MeMo observed similar trend with an expansion from Northern parts bordering Mali and Niger, to the Est Region on the borders with Benin, Niger, and Togo. Militant groups have been trying to establish a base there since early 2016, explaining groups’ ability to carry complex deadly attacks, including the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). • Violence in the eastern part of Burkina Faso by militant groups most likely to continue. In addition to targeting security forces and intimidation acts against civil servants, militants will look to continue to disrupt gold mining in the area. In fact, security forces in charge of protecting gold mines or escorting staff have been subject to attacks by militants at least in August 2018. If this to continue, livelihoods of local communities benefiting from gold mining could be at risk if security situation continues to deteriorate in the region. • These attacks are mostly attributed rather than claimed by militant groups known to operate in Burkina Faso. These militant groups include Ansaroul Islam, Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen (JNIM), and Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS).
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Challenges and U.S. Military Activities in the Greater Middle East and Africa
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 116–10] NATIONAL SECURITY CHALLENGES AND U.S. MILITARY ACTIVITIES IN THE GREATER MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD MARCH 7, 2019 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–296 WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS ADAM SMITH, Washington, Chairman SUSAN A. DAVIS, California WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island JOE WILSON, South Carolina RICK LARSEN, Washington ROB BISHOP, Utah JIM COOPER, Tennessee MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOHN GARAMENDI, California K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JACKIE SPEIER, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri RUBEN GALLEGO, Arizona AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts MO BROOKS, Alabama SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California PAUL COOK, California ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland, Vice BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama Chair SAM GRAVES, Missouri RO KHANNA, California ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee FILEMON VELA, Texas RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana ANDY KIM, New Jersey TRENT KELLY, Mississippi KENDRA S. HORN, Oklahoma MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin GILBERT RAY CISNEROS, Jr., California MATT GAETZ, Florida CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania DON BACON, Nebraska JASON CROW, Colorado JIM BANKS, Indiana XOCHITL TORRES SMALL, New Mexico LIZ CHENEY, Wyoming ELISSA SLOTKIN, Michigan PAUL MITCHELL, Michigan MIKIE SHERRILL, New Jersey JACK BERGMAN, Michigan KATIE HILL, California MICHAEL WALTZ, Florida VERONICA ESCOBAR, Texas DEBRA A. HAALAND, New Mexico JARED F. GOLDEN, Maine LORI TRAHAN, Massachusetts ELAINE G. LURIA, Virginia PAUL ARCANGELI, Staff Director WILL T.
    [Show full text]