1. Raymond Williams, the Long Revolution (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1965)
Notes Introduction Creativity: The Theoretical Context 1. Raymond Williams, The Long Revolution (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1965). 2. Williams argues that while Plato and Aristotle shared the conception of art as essentially mimetic they drew different conclusions from it. Plato regarded art as a pale and worthless imitation of reality while Aristotle saw art as reflecting an idealised or higher reality. In The Creativity Question (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1976), Albert Rothenberg and Carl Hausman identify the differences be- tween Plato and Aristotle's conception of creativity. Plato saw creativ- ity as divine inspiration, the intervention of the Gods, while Aristotle tended to regard creativity as a productive activity following natural laws. 3. M. H. Abrams, The Mirror and the Lamp (London: Oxford University Press, 1953). 4. Colin Campbell, The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Consumerism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), p. 182. 5. The phrase is borrowed from the seminal work by Mario Praz, The Romantic Agony (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933). 6. Frank Kermode, Romantic Image (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957). 7. Karl Miller examines numerous literary examples of 'the dynamic metaphor of the second self' in Doubles: Studies in Literary History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985). 8. Williams, p. 44. 9. Warren Steinkraus, 'Artistic Creativity and Pain' in M. Mitias (ed.), Creativity in Art, Religion and Culture (Amsterdam, 1985), talks about various aspects of pain associated with the creative process including the pain of making a selection from limitless material, the pain of personal exposure; of having one's innermost feelings made transpa- rent through the art-work, and the pain of suppressed emotion.
[Show full text]