DOCSLIB.ORG

Friendfeed 1 Friendfeed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Friendfeed 1 Friendfeed FriendFeed 1 FriendFeed FriendFeed [1] URL friendfeed.com Type of site Social aggregator Available language(s) English, Persian, German, Spanish, French, Japanese, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Turkish, Italian Owner Facebook Inc. Created by Bret Taylor, Jim Norris, Paul Buchheit and Sanjeev Singh Launched October 2007 [2] Alexa rank 735 Current status Online FriendFeed is a real-time feed aggregator that consolidates the updates from social media and social networking websites, social bookmarking websites, blogs and micro-blogging updates, as well as any other type of RSS/ Atom feed. It is possible to use this stream of information to create customized feeds to share, as well as originate new posts-discussions, (and comment) with friends.[3] The goal of FriendFeed according to their website is to make content on the Web more relevant and useful by using existing social network as a tool for discovering interesting information. Users can be an individual, business or organization. Bloggers writing about FriendFeed have said that this service addresses the shortcomings of social media services which exclusively facilitate tracking of their own members' social media activities on that particular social media service, whereas FriendFeed provides the facility to track these activities (such as posting on blogs, Twitter and Flickr) across a broad range of different social networks.[4] Some bloggers are concerned about readers commenting on their posts inside FriendFeed instead of on their blogs, resulting in fewer page views for the blogger.[5] The founders are all former Google Inc. employees who were involved in the launch of services such as Gmail and Google Maps. They include Paul Buchheit, Jim Norris, Sanjeev Singh and Bret Taylor. Venture capital agency Benchmark Capital is involved with the investment funding. FriendFeed is based in Mountain View, California and had on average one million monthly visitors. Employees of FriendFeed created the Simple Update Protocol to reduce the load put on sites by aggregators such as theirs. On August 10, 2009, Facebook Inc. agreed to acquire FriendFeed.[6] FriendFeed was bought for $15 million in cash, and $32.5 million in Facebook stock.[7] FriendFeed 2 Supported services A user can configure their FriendFeed account to aggregate content from the following services: Blogging Books Status Video Miscellaneous • Ameba • Goodreads • Brightkite • 12seconds • Custom RSS/Atom • Baidu Space • LibraryThing • Facebook • Dailymotion • Amazon.com • Blogger News • Gmail/Google Talk • Joost • LinkedIn • Tumblr • identi.ca • Seesmic • Netflix • Digg • LiveJournal • Plurk • Smotri • Netvibes • Google Reader • Skyrock • Twitter • Vimeo • Polyvore • Meneame • YouTube • SlideShare Bookmarking • Mixx Music • tipjoy • Delicious • Reddit • iLike Comments • Upcoming • Diigo • Last.fm • Backtype Photos • Wakoopa • Furl • Pandora • Disqus • Flickr • Yelp • Hatena • Intense Debate • Fotolog • Ma.gnolia • Photobucket • Mister Wong • Picasa • StumbleUpon • SmugMug • Twine • Zooomr References [1] http:/ / friendfeed. com/ [2] "friendfeed.com - Traffic Details from Alexa" (http:/ / www. alexa. com/ siteinfo/ friendfeed. com). Alexa Internet, Inc. Retrieved 2009-10-17. [3] "AT&T and Verizon Wireless Offer New Services for Friends" (http:/ / bits. blogs. nytimes. com/ 2008/ 09/ 09/ att-and-verizon-wireless-offer-new-services-for-friends/ ) September 9th, 2008 New York Times, retrieved September 11th, 2008 [4] FriendFeed launch cover on VentureBeat, October 1, 2007 (http:/ / venturebeat. com/ 2007/ 10/ 01/ friendfeed-a-company-lets-you-see-all-your-friends-feeds/ ) [5] "Just How Much is the Conversation Worth?" (http:/ / www. centernetworks. com/ conversation-monetization) CenterNetworks.com, July 3, 2008 [6] http:/ / www. facebook. com/ press/ releases. php?p=116581 Facebook Press Release [7] http:/ / www. techcrunch. com/ 2009/ 08/ 10/ the-cost-of-friendfeed-roughly-50-million-in-cash-and-stock/ Techcrunch Sale Price External links • FriendFeed (http:/ / friendfeed. com/ ) • FriendFeed Is This Years Twitter, But Why? (http:/ / www. techcrunch. com/ 2008/ 03/ 14/ friendfeed-is-this-years-twitter-but-why/ ) • Friendfeed.com raises $5m VC (http:/ / www. indusbusinessjournal. com/ ME2/ dirmod. asp?sid=& nm=& type=Publishing& mod=Publications::Article& mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791& tier=4& id=8B91C64FDD134A72A97A61AC49AE688B) • FriendFeed: All The Numbers That Matter (infographic) (http:/ / www. kawakumi. com/ 2010/ 08/ 02/ friendfeed-all-the-numbers-that-matter-infographics/ ) Article Sources and Contributors 3 Article Sources and Contributors FriendFeed Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=432390567 Contributors: A.Ward, Ade oshineye, Aeon17x, AloneGarcon, Alteregoz, Avian, Bazonka, Berker.peksag, Bonadea, Brian.Rainbow, Cagedether, Cem live, Chris9086, CyberSkull, D2s, Dreamyshade, Dweekly, Ebraminio, Ericross, Fngosa, FrankTobia, Fukumoto, Grazfather, Gych, Hasantosun, Igorberger, Jaavid, Jake Wasdin, Jhs, Jimcripps, Khatru2, Leki, Liamfahy1, LimeHat, LouCypher, Mark Renier, Mystalic, Nealmcb, Nestea Zen, Nil Einne, O.neill.kid, Ontarioemperor, Philwiki, Rampley, Rat2, Rutja76, Savism, Shashkina, Silverspark, Squids and Chips, Steven Walling, Tanath, Toussaint, Tweetfeeds, Vlad, Voyagerfan5761, Yellowdesk, 51 anonymous edits Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors Image:FriendFeed.png Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:FriendFeed.png License: Fair Use Contributors: Avian License Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported http:/ / creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by-sa/ 3. 0/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Principles, Models, and Methods for the Characterization and Analysis of Lurkers in Online Social Networks
    Principles, models, and methods for the characterization and analysis of lurkers in online social networks Roberto Interdonato, Andrea Tagarelli DIMES Dept., Università della Calabria, Italy The 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods Lurk(er): what meanings Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods “Lurker”: let’s google it … Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods Lurk(er): what meanings Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods Outline 1. Lurking in online communities 2. Modeling lurking behaviors Topology-driven lurking definition The issue of controversial definitions Lurking and online behavioral 3. Lurker ranking methods models 4. Experimental evaluation The opportunity of de-lurking Static scenarios Dynamic scenarios 5. Applications to other domains Vicariously learning Lurking in social trust contexts 6. Delurking via Targeted Influence Maximization The DEvOTION algorithm 7. Conclusion and future work Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods LURKING IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods The 1:9:90 rule of participation inequality (1/3) Arthur, C. (2006). What is the 1% rule? In: The guardian. UK: Guardian News and Media. Lurking in OSNs: Principles, Models, and Methods The 1:9:90 rule of participation inequality (2/3) • [Nonnecke & Preece, 2000] Email-based discussion lists: • 77 online health support groups and 21 online technical support groups • 46% of the health support group members and 82% of the technical support group members are lurkers • [Swartz, 2006] On Wikipedia: over 50% of all the edits are done by only 0.7% of the users • [van Mierlo, 2014] On four DHSNs (AlcoholHelpCenter, DepressionCenter, PanicCenter, and StopSmokingCenter): • 63,990 users, 578,349 posts • Lurkers account for 1.3% (n=4668), Contributors for 24.0% (n=88,732), and Superusers for 74.7% (n=276,034) of content Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Unanticipated Outcomes of Having a Fun Organizational Culture
    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga UTC Scholar Student Research, Creative Works, and Honors Theses Publications 5-2018 An examination of the unanticipated outcomes of having a fun organizational culture Victoria Baltz University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons Recommended Citation Baltz, Victoria, "An examination of the unanticipated outcomes of having a fun organizational culture" (2018). Honors Theses. This Theses is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research, Creative Works, and Publications at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Page 1 An Examination of the Unanticipated Outcomes of Having a Fun Organizational Culture Victoria Baltz Departmental Honors Thesis The University of Tennessee Chattanooga Management Examination Date: March 26th, 2018 Randy Evans, Ph.D. Philip Roundy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Management, UC Foundation Assistant Professor of UC Foundation Associate Professor Entrepreneurship Thesis Advisor Department Advisor Richard Allen, Ph.D. UC Foundation Professor of Management Department Advisor Page 2 Abstract Fun organizational cultures break the social constructs of the traditional work environment. Fun organizational cultures have been gaining popularity over the past couple decades. Since fun cultures are gaining attractiveness due to reports focused primarily on the positive aspects of fun cultures, this study examined if there were any unanticipated negative outcomes of a having a fun organizational culture. Qualitative data was pulled from interviews conducted with various members of fun organizational cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 6 C O R P O R a T E Amazon/Acquisitions the Chart
    CORPORATE Amazon/Acquisitions The chart below delineates Amazon’s biggest acquisitions, according to Thomson Reuters Deal Intelligence, as reported by The Wall Street Journal: Company Deal Value (Billions) Whole Foods MarKet $13.70 Zappos.com $1.20 Twitch Interactive $0.97 Kiva Systems $0.78 Souq.com $0.70 Quidsi $0.55 Elemental Technologies $0.30 Atlas Air Worldwide $0.28 Alexa Internet $0.26 Exchange.com $0.25 SoftBanK/Charter In early August, Charter Communications passed on the idea of acquiring Sprint, which is majority owned by SoftBanK, a Japanese telecommunications company. Last week, rumors began to circulate that SoftBank is exploring a complex taKeover of Charter. FAST FOOD Little Caesars/Portal Pizza chain Little Caesars introduce The Pizza Portal, a machine that lets Machine customers who order pies to skip the line, grab their pizza and go in more than a dozen locations in the Tucson (AZ) area. How it worKs: download an app to order and pay for food, receive a three digit or QR code and once in the store enter or scan the code to open a self-service hot box at the shop. GLOBAL Nuclear Warheads Estimated nuclear warhead inventories, as reported by The Wall Street Journal: Country Warheads Country Warheads Russia 7,000 Pakistan 140 U.S. 6,800 India 130 France 300 Israel 80 China 270 North Korea 10* U.K. 215 Pakistan 140 *Projection 1 of 6 MOVIES TicKet Sales According to Nielsen, North American box office ticKet sales are down 2.9% even with ticKet prices higher than the prior year – maKing up for some of the diminished theater attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet and Drug Markets
    INSIGHTS EN ISSN THE INTERNET AND DRUG MARKETS 2314-9264 The internet and drug markets 21 The internet and drug markets EMCDDA project group Jane Mounteney, Alessandra Bo and Alberto Oteo 21 Legal notice This publication of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) is protected by copyright. The EMCDDA accepts no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of the data contained in this document. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the EMCDDA’s partners, any EU Member State or any agency or institution of the European Union. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 ISBN: 978-92-9168-841-8 doi:10.2810/324608 © European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. This publication should be referenced as: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2016), The internet and drug markets, EMCDDA Insights 21, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. References to chapters in this publication should include, where relevant, references to the authors of each chapter, together with a reference to the wider publication. For example: Mounteney, J., Oteo, A. and Griffiths, P.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRUTH CAN CATCH the LIE: the FLAWED UNDERSTANDING of ONLINE SPEECH in INRE Anonymous ONLINE SPEAKERS Musetta Durkeet
    THE TRUTH CAN CATCH THE LIE: THE FLAWED UNDERSTANDING OF ONLINE SPEECH IN INRE ANoNYMous ONLINE SPEAKERS Musetta Durkeet In the early years of the Internet, many cases seeking disclosure of anonymous online speakers involved large companies seeking to unveil identities of anonymous posters criticizing the companies on online financial message boards.' In such situations, Internet service providers (ISPs)-or, less often, online service providers (OSPs)2-- disclosed individually- identifying information, often without providing defendants notice of this disclosure,' and judges showed hostility towards defendants' motions to quash.4 Often these subpoenas were issued by parties alleging various civil causes of action, including defamation and tortious interference with business contracts.s These cases occurred in a time when courts and the general public alike pictured the Internet as a wild west-like "frontier society,"' devoid of governing norms, where anonymous personalities ran C 2011 Musetta Durkee. t J.D. Candidate, 2012, University of California, Berkeley School of Law. 1. Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Anonymity in Cyberspace: What Can We LearnfromJohn Doe?, 50 B.C. L. REv. 1373, 1373-74 (2009). 2. As will be discussed below, there has been some conflation of two separate services that allow users to access the Internet, on the one hand, and engage in various activities, speech, and communication, on the other. Most basically, this Note distinguishes between Internet Service Providers (JSPs) and Online Service Providers (OSPs) in order to separate those services and companies involved with providing subscribers access to the infrastructure of the Internet (ISPs, and their subscribers) and those services and companies involved with providing users with online applications, services, platforms, and spaces on the Internet (OSPs and their users).
    [Show full text]
  • Web Hacking 101 How to Make Money Hacking Ethically
    Web Hacking 101 How to Make Money Hacking Ethically Peter Yaworski © 2015 - 2016 Peter Yaworski Tweet This Book! Please help Peter Yaworski by spreading the word about this book on Twitter! The suggested tweet for this book is: Can’t wait to read Web Hacking 101: How to Make Money Hacking Ethically by @yaworsk #bugbounty The suggested hashtag for this book is #bugbounty. Find out what other people are saying about the book by clicking on this link to search for this hashtag on Twitter: https://twitter.com/search?q=#bugbounty For Andrea and Ellie. Thanks for supporting my constant roller coaster of motivation and confidence. This book wouldn’t be what it is if it were not for the HackerOne Team, thank you for all the support, feedback and work that you contributed to make this book more than just an analysis of 30 disclosures. Contents 1. Foreword ....................................... 1 2. Attention Hackers! .................................. 3 3. Introduction ..................................... 4 How It All Started ................................. 4 Just 30 Examples and My First Sale ........................ 5 Who This Book Is Written For ........................... 7 Chapter Overview ................................. 8 Word of Warning and a Favour .......................... 10 4. Background ...................................... 11 5. HTML Injection .................................... 14 Description ....................................... 14 Examples ........................................ 14 1. Coinbase Comments .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Venture Capital and Antitrust, February 12, 2020
    Venture Capital and Antitrust Transcript of Proceedings at the Public Workshop Held by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice February 12, 2020 Paul Brest Hall Stanford University 555 Salvatierra Walk Stanford, CA 94305 Table of Contents Opening Remarks ......................................................................................................................... 1 Fireside Chat with Michael Moritz: Trends in VC Investment: How did we get here? ........ 5 Antitrust for VCs: A Discussion with Stanford Law Professor Doug Melamed ................... 14 Panel 1: What explains the Kill Zones? .................................................................................... 22 Afternoon Remarks .................................................................................................................... 40 Panel 2: Monetizing data ............................................................................................................ 42 Panel 3: Investing in platform-dominated markets ................................................................. 62 Roundtable: Is there a problem and what is the solution? ..................................................... 84 Closing Remarks ......................................................................................................................... 99 Public Workshop on Venture Capital and Antitrust, February 12, 2020 Opening Remarks • Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice MAKAN
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Why You Should Care What Is Social Media? Social Network
    Social Media Why You Should Care IST 331 - Olivier Georgeon, Frank Ritter 31 oct 15 • eMarketer (2007) estimated by 2011 one-half Examples of all Internet users will use social networking • Facebook regulary. • YouTube • By 2015, 75% use • Myspace • Twitter • Del.icio.us • Digg • Etc… 2 What is Social Media? Social Network • Social Network • Online communities of people who share • User Generated Content (UGC) interests and activities, • Social Bookmarking • … or who are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others. • Examples: Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Orkut • Falls to analysis with tools in Ch. 9 3 4 User Generated Content (UGC) Social Bookmarking • A method for Internet users to store, organize, search, • or Consumer Generated Media (CGM) and manage bookmarks of web pages on the Internet with the help of metadata. • Based on communities; • Defined: Media content that is publicly – The more people who bookmark a piece of content, the more available and produced by end-users (user). value it is determined to have. • Examples: Digg, Del.icio.us, StumbleUpon, and reddit….and now combinations • Usually supported by a social network • Examples: Blogs, Micro-blogs, YouTube video, Flickr photos, Wiki content, Facebook wall posts, reddit, Second Life… 5 6 Social Media Principles Generate an activity stream • Automatic • Who you are – Google History, Google Analytics – Personalization • Blog • Who you know • Micro-blog – Browse network – Twitter, yammer, identi.ca • What you do • Mailing groups – Generate an activity stream
    [Show full text]
  • POPULAR SOCIAL MEDIA SITES Below Is a List of Some of the Most Commonly Used Youth and Teen Social Networking Sites and Tools
    POPULAR SOCIAL MEDIA SITES Below is a list of some of the most commonly used youth and teen social networking sites and tools. Ask.fm (http://ask.fm) Participants log on, post a question anonymously and anyone may answer anonymously. “Do you think I am fat?” or “Would you date me?” are examples of questions posted in the past. There have also been examples in which individuals were encouraged to kill themselves. The site has courted controversy by not having workable reporting, tracking or parental control processes, which have become the norm on other social media websites. Twitter (https://twitter.com) An online social networking and microblogging service that enables users to send and read "tweets", which are text messages limited to 140 characters. Instagram (http://instagram.com) A photo-sharing app for iPhone. Kik (http://kik.com) Kik is as an alternative to email or text messaging and its popularity has grown in the last two years. Kik is accessible on smartphones and supports over 4 million users, called “Kicksters.” Users are not restricted to sending text messages with Kik. Images, videos, sketches, emoticions and more may be sent. A user can block users on Kik from contacting them. Wanelo (http://wanelo.com) Wanelo (from Want, Need, Love) sells unique products online, all posted by users. Products posted for sale range from dishes, clothing, intimate wear and other potentially “R-Rated” products. Vine (https://vine.co) Vine is used to create and share free and instant six-second videos. Topic and content ranges. Snapchat (http://www.snapchat.com) A photo messaging application.
    [Show full text]
  • M&A @ Facebook: Strategy, Themes and Drivers
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from NOVA – School of Business and Economics M&A @ FACEBOOK: STRATEGY, THEMES AND DRIVERS TOMÁS BRANCO GONÇALVES STUDENT NUMBER 3200 A Project carried out on the Masters in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Pedro Carvalho January 2018 Abstract Most deals are motivated by the recognition of a strategic threat or opportunity in the firm’s competitive arena. These deals seek to improve the firm’s competitive position or even obtain resources and new capabilities that are vital to future prosperity, and improve the firm’s agility. The purpose of this work project is to make an analysis on Facebook’s acquisitions’ strategy going through the key acquisitions in the company’s history. More than understanding the economics of its most relevant acquisitions, the main research is aimed at understanding the strategic view and key drivers behind them, and trying to set a pattern through hypotheses testing, always bearing in mind the following question: Why does Facebook acquire emerging companies instead of replicating their key success factors? Keywords Facebook; Acquisitions; Strategy; M&A Drivers “The biggest risk is not taking any risk... In a world that is changing really quickly, the only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks.” Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook 2 Literature Review M&A activity has had peaks throughout the course of history and different key industry-related drivers triggered that same activity (Sudarsanam, 2003). Historically, the appearance of the first mergers and acquisitions coincides with the existence of the first companies and, since then, in the US market, there have been five major waves of M&A activity (as summarized by T.J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: a Review and Framework
    Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework Item Type Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated) Authors Trant, Jennifer Citation Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework 2009-01, 10(1) Journal of Digital Information Journal Journal of Digital Information Download date 02/10/2021 03:25:18 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105375 Trant, Jennifer (2009) Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework. Journal of Digital Information 10(1). Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework J. Trant, University of Toronto / Archives & Museum Informatics 158 Lee Ave, Toronto, ON Canada M4E 2P3 jtrant [at] archimuse.com Abstract This paper reviews research into social tagging and folksonomy (as reflected in about 180 sources published through December 2007). Methods of researching the contribution of social tagging and folksonomy are described, and outstanding research questions are presented. This is a new area of research, where theoretical perspectives and relevant research methods are only now being defined. This paper provides a framework for the study of folksonomy, tagging and social tagging systems. Three broad approaches are identified, focusing first, on the folksonomy itself (and the role of tags in indexing and retrieval); secondly, on tagging (and the behaviour of users); and thirdly, on the nature of social tagging systems (as socio-technical frameworks). Keywords: Social tagging, folksonomy, tagging, literature review, research review 1. Introduction User-generated keywords – tags – have been suggested as a lightweight way of enhancing descriptions of on-line information resources, and improving their access through broader indexing. “Social Tagging” refers to the practice of publicly labeling or categorizing resources in a shared, on-line environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms
    Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms Jing Peng1, Ashish Agarwal2, Kartik Hosanagar3, Raghuram Iyengar3 1School of Business, University of Connecticut 2McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin 3The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania [email protected] [email protected] {kartikh, riyengar}@wharton.upenn.edu February 15, 2017 Acknowledgments. We benefited from feedback from session participants at 2013 Symposium on Statistical Challenges in eCommerce Research, 2014 International Conference on Information Systems, 2015 Workshop on Information in Networks, 2015 INFORMS Annual Meeting, and 2015 Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. The authors would like to thank Professors Christophe Van den Bulte, Paul Shaman, and Dylan Small for helpful discussions. This project was made possible by financial support extended to the first author through Mack Institute Research Fellowship, President Gutmann's Leadership Award, and Baker Retailing Center PhD Research Grant. 1 Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms ABSTRACT We study the impact of network overlap – the overlap in network connections between two users – on content sharing in directed social media platforms. We propose a hazards model that flexibly captures the impact of three different measures of network overlap (i.e., common followees, common followers and common mutual followers) on content sharing. Our results indicate a receiver is more likely to share content from a sender with whom they share more common followees, common followers or common mutual followers after accounting for other measures. Additionally, the effect of common followers and common mutual followers is positive when the content is novel but decreases, and may even become negative, when many others in the network have already adopted it.
    [Show full text]