DOCSLIB.ORG

The Euphronios Krater? Nationalism and Internationalism in the Protection of Archaeological Heritage Marina Papa-Sokal*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Euphronios Krater? Nationalism and Internationalism in the Protection of Archaeological Heritage Marina Papa-Sokal* Present Pasts Vol. 3, 2011, 2-8 doi: 10.5334/pp.37 Who “Owns” the Euphronios Krater? Nationalism and Internationalism in the Protection of Archaeological Heritage Marina Papa-Sokal* This paper is based in part on a longer article, “Beyond the nationalist–internationalist polarisa- tion in the protection of archaeological heritage: A response to Professor Merryman”, that was published in Art Antiquity and Law, vol. XIV, no. 3 (October 2009), pp. 237–274. We thank the editor of Art Antiquity and Law for permission to republish some of this material here. “Sublime” and “smuggled in for sure” were some of the But in 1992, the special branch of the Italian Carabi- thoughts that went through the mind of Thomas Hoving, nieri dedicated to the protection of the country’s cul- then Director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New tural patrimony opened a criminal investigation against York, when he first set his eyes on this Krater by Euphroni- Giacomo Medici, a notorious antiquities dealer, after a os (Figure 1) — as he himself recounts the story in his au- series of raids at his home in Italy and at a large ware- tobiography and other writings (Hoving,1993: 312; 2010). house he kept in the Geneva freeport revealed compel- ling evidence of a massive smuggling operation of antiq- uities from Italy and elsewhere. Medici himself was put on trial and convicted, but the investigation ended up impli cating a number of major American museums and collectors as likely buyers of illegally excavated Italian antiquities, including the Met, the Getty Museum in Los Angeles, the Cleveland Museum, the Princeton Univer- sity Art Museum and the prominent New York collectors Leon Levy and Shelby White. After lengthy negotiations be tween them and the Italian government, a number of antiquities thought to have been illegally exported from Italy over the past decades were returned to the Italian state. In addition, two prominent figures in the art world, Marion True, chief curator of Greek and Roman antiqui- ties at the Getty Museum, and Robert Hecht, the prolific antiquities dealer who had sold the Euphronios Krater to the Met, are now facing criminal charges at a high-profile trial in Rome. Among the recovered objects was the Euphronios Krater. The Italian investigation established that, in all Fig. 1: The Euphronios Krater. likelihood, the Krater had been illicitly excavated in the area of Greppe Sant’Angelo, near Cerveteri, in December 1971 by a gang of tombaroli. The vase, together with 68 Despite serious doubts about the Krater’s provenance, other recovered antiquities, was triumphantly displayed the Metropolitan Museum decided to acquire the vase at a widely acclaimed exhibition at the Palazzo del Quiri- in 1972, for one million dollars, at the time a staggering nale in Rome in 2008. The suggestive title of the exhibi- amount of money for an antiquity, from an American art tion was Nostoi: Capolavori Ritrovati — an obvious allusion dealer based in Rome. The acquisition was closely scruti- to the homecoming journeys of the Greek heroes from the nized in the press and openly condemned in some quar- Trojan war. ters. Nevertheless, the Euphronios Krater remained one of Italy is not, in fact, the only country seeking restitution the crowning glories of the Met’s collection for over 30 of its illegally excavated or illegally exported antiquities. years. Greece, Turkey, Peru and several other countries have made highly publicized claims in recent years, mostly against museums and collectors in the United States. * UCL Institute of Archaeology Papa-Sokol: Who “Owns” the Euphronios Krater? 3 However, at this point, one may begin to wonder wheth- erate internationalism that opposes all private ownership er we are actually making a mistake by framing the de- of antiquities while encouraging the international circula- bate about how best to protect the world’s archaeological tion of art and antiquities among public institutions. The heritage around the narrow legal concepts of “property” ultimate goal is to move beyond the nationalist vs. inter- and “ownership”. Perhaps, by conceiving more broadly the nationalist polarization and to devise means to protect different types of protection that archaeological re sources the world cultural heritage while making it available to can receive — and the different actors who might be au- citizens of all countries. thorized to make decisions about that protection — we It is useful to start by being clear about what the prob- might make more progress on the problem. lem is. Of course, as we archaeologists well know — but Incidentally, it is worth remembering that the concept the general public and politicians often do not ap preciate of cultural “property” is a peculiarly English terminology. — the purpose of archaeology is not just to recover pretty In Italian, we usually talk of “beni” culturali, just as in objects from the ground; it is to reconstruct the history of French we say “biens” culturels. the human past. Indeed, some of the most useful infor- Furthermore, it is often difficult to attribute “owner- mation for archaeologists comes from items that have no ship” to one particular coun try. Modern state borders monetary or aesthetic value at all: pottery shards, pieces rarely coincide with those of ancient civilizations. In ad- of charcoal, human and animal bones, even seeds and dition, because of trade within the ancient world, objects pollen. All the information that could be obtained by sci- may be found in archae ological sites far from the place entific excavation is irreparably destroyed every time an where they had been originally produced. In purely con- archaeological site is plundered. At best we are left with a ceptual terms, why should an Attic vase found in an Etrus- few objects, beautiful as they may be, but silent. can tomb at Cerveteri or Vulci be considered the “prop- In the past two decades, the looting of the human past erty” of Italy rather than, say, Greece? Or, for that matter, has become a large-scale industry. Archaeological sites shouldn’t we consider cultural heritage as belonging to around the world are being stripped clean to feed the humanity as a whole? world market in antiquities. As journalist Roger Atwood There are, in fact, huge legal and ethical questions in- documents in his recent book Stealing History, looters are volved and making the right decision is not always easy well-organized and increasingly well-informed about the or clear-cut. tastes of collectors in rich countries (Atwood, 2004).The In this paper I would like to address the debate between pillage of archaeological sites, no less than the drug trade, nationalist and interna tionalist approaches to the protec- is driven by demand from the market. tion of cultural heritage, as well as the quite different de- Several detailed case studies have given additional quan- bate between the supporters of a freer trade vs. the sup- titative documentation of the trade in specific categories porters of more stringent regulations on the movement of of illicitly excavated antiquities. For instance, Ricardo Elia cultural property. Most importantly, I would like to help has carried out an exhaustive analysis of the Apulian red- disentangle and clarify a number of confusions that have figure vases in museums, private collections and the pri- long marred this debate: vate market, using the comprehensive vase lists published in 1978–1993 by Trendall and Cambitoglou together with 1. miscasting the controversy as a dichotomy between all Sotheby’s London and New York antiquities catalogues “nationalist” and “interna tionalist” approaches in for the period 1960–98 (Elia, 2001: 145-153). He docu- which “nationalist” is assumed to be a synonym for ments “a virtual flooding of the international market [in “anti-market” and “internationalist” for “pro-mar- the 1980s] with previously undoc umented Apulian vases, ket”. I shall argue that this conflation is improper: as well as robust collecting, both by museums and espe- internationalists can perfectly well oppose the pri- cially by private collectors” (ibid. 148-149). He concludes vate collecting of antiquities, just as nationalists that: can support it. 2. failing to stress the crucial difference between mu- Since the only possible source of genuine, new seums and public institutions on the one hand and Apulian pottery is looted archaeological sites in private collectors on the other. Puglia, the updated vase lists published by Tren dall 3. failing to take proper account of the differences be- and Cambitoglou in effect provide documentary tween antiquities and other classes of art. evidence of massive looting of archaeological sites 4. indiscriminately using the word “market” to denote in Puglia in recent years (ibid. 149) very different types of trans action, between differ- ent types of buyers and sellers. Moreover, for each valuable (i.e., marketable) object re- 5. eliding the fundamental differences between ex- covered by looters, many more sites are destroyed in the port control laws and national patrimony laws. process. On the basis of vase counts from archaeolog ically excavated Apulian tombs, Elia estimates that The key issue, I will argue, is not whether all archaeo- logical material should necessar ily be kept in its country several thousands, even tens of thousands, of an- of origin; it is how best to safeguard archaeological sites cient tombs [must] have been plundered to obtain from looting and pillage. I shall therefore defend a mod- the more than 13,600 Apulian red-figure vases that Papa-Sokol: Who “Owns” the Euphronios Krater? 4 exist throughout the world and were recovered in a particular, for antiquities, we need laws, such as patrimony non-archaeological manner. (ibid. 151) laws that assign ownership of all undiscovered antiquities to the State, to ensure the protection not just of what is Nationalism vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Priceless Artifacts Return to Italy and Greece, but Their Histories Remain
    ntiquities dealers Robert Hecht and Giacomo Medici should have tidied up their desks. Raids by the Italian police in 1995 and 2000 yielded a mountain Aof evidence—from photos of Greek and Roman artifacts still in the ground to Hecht’s handwritten memoir—that showed exactly how A Tangled Journey Home the two had been trafficking looted antiquities through the international art market for decades Priceless artifacts return to Italy (“Raiding the Tomb Raiders,” July/August and greece, but their histories 2006). Their clients included, among others, three preeminent American cultural institutions: remain lost. the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; and the J. Paul by Eti Bonn-Muller and Eric A. Powell Getty Museum, Malibu. Italy and Greece were simultaneously outraged and delighted with the news. Their long-standing suspicions were confirmed: Metropolitan MuSeuM of art artifacts recently acquired by major museums New York, New York had been looted from their soil. And they lthough the Met maintains that it acquired the jumped at the opportunity to get them back. artifacts in good faith, the museum has already trans- Years of negotiations in the style of a Greek Aferred title of 21 objects to Italy’s Ministry of Culture. So tragedy finally paid off and have resulted in some far, the Met has sent back four terracotta vessels and is planning delicately worded agreements providing for to return the other objects over the next few years. As part of the repatriations and reciprocal long-term loans. 2006 agreement, the Ministry is allowing the Met to display the The following pages showcase a handful of remaining pieces for a while longer to coincide with the opening of the 62 artifacts that have been (or are slated to the museum’s new Greek and Roman galleries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underworld Krater from Altamura
    The Underworld Krater from Altamura The Underworld krater was found in 1847 in Altamura in 1 7 Persephone and Hades Herakles and Kerberos ITALY southeastern Italy. The ancient name of the town is unknown, Hades, ruler of the Underworld, was the brother of Zeus (king of the gods) and Poseidon (god of The most terrifying of Herakles’s twelve labors was to kidnap the guard dog of the Underworld. APULIA Naples but by the fourth century bc it was one of the largest fortified Altamura the sea). He abducted Persephone, daughter of the goddess Demeter, to be his wife and queen. For anyone who attempted to leave the realm of the dead without permission, Kerberos (Latin, Taranto (Taras) m settlements in the region. There is little information about Although Hades eventually agreed to release Persephone, he had tricked her into eating the seeds Cerberus) was a threatening opponent. The poet Hesiod (active about 700 BC) described the e d i t e r of a pomegranate, and so she was required to descend to the Underworld for part of each year. “bronze-voiced” dog as having fifty heads; later texts and depictions give it two or three. r a what else was deposited with the krater, but its scale suggests n e a n Here Persephone sits beside Hades in their palace. s e a that it came from the tomb of a prominent individual whose community had the resources to create and transport such a 2 9 substantial vessel. 2 The Children of Herakles and Megara 8 Woman Riding a Hippocamp Map of southern Italy marking key locations mentioned in this gallery The inhabitants of southeastern Italy—collectively known as The Herakleidai (children of Herakles) and their mother, Megara, are identified by the Greek The young woman riding a creature that is part horse, part fish is a puzzling presence in the Apulians—buried their dead with assemblages of pottery and other goods, and large vessels inscriptions above their heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Kourimos Parthenos
    KOURIMOS PARTHENOS The fragments of an oinochoe ' illustrated here preserve for us the earliest known representation in any medium of the dress and the masks worn by actors in Attic tragedy.2 The style of the vase suggests a date in the neighborhood of 470: 3 a time, that is, when both Aischylos and Sophokles 4 were active in the theatre. Thus, even though our fragments may not shed much new light on the " dark history of the IInv. No. P 11810. Three fragments, mended from five. Height; a, 0.073 m.; b, 0.046 m.; c, 0.065 m. From a round-bodied oinochoe, Beazley Shape III; fairly thin fabric, excellent glaze; relief contour except for the mask; sketch lines on the boy's body. The use of added color is described below, p. 269. For the lower border, a running spiral, with small loops between the spirals. Inside, dull black to brown glaze wash. The fragments were found just outside the Agora Excava- tions, near the bottom of a modern sewer trench along the south side of the Theseion Square, some 200 m. to the south of the temple, at a depth of about 3 m. below the street level. 2 For the fifth century, certainly, relevant comparative material has been limited to three pieces: the relief from the Peiraeus, now in the National Museum, Athens (N. M. 1500; Svoronos, Athener Nationalmuseum, pl. 82), which shows three actors, two of them carrying masks, approaching a reclining Dionysos; the Pronomos vase in Naples (Furtwangler-Reichhold, pls. 143-145), with its elaborate preparations for a satyr-play; and the pelike in Boston, by the Phiale painter (Att.
    [Show full text]
  • A Masterpiece of Ancient Greece
    Press Release A Masterpiece of Ancient Multimedia Greece: a World of Men, Feb. 01 - Sept. 01 2013 Gods, and Heroes DNP, Gotanda Building, Tokyo Louvre - DNP Museum Lab Tenth presentation in Tokyo The tenth Louvre - DNP Museum Lab presentation, which closes the second phase of this partnership between the Louvre and Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd (DNP), invites visitors to discover the art of ancient Greece, a civilization which had a significant impact on Western art and culture. They will be able to admire four works from the Louvre's Greek art collection, and in particular a ceramic masterpiece known as the Krater of Antaeus. This experimental exhibition features a series of original multimedia displays designed to enhance the observation and understanding of Greek artworks. Three of the displays designed for this presentation are scheduled for relocation in 2014 to the Louvre in Paris. They will be installed in three rooms of the Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Red-figure calyx krater Signed by the painter Euphronios, attributed to the Antiquities, one of which is currently home to the Venus de Milo. potter Euxitheos. Athens, c. 515–510 BC. Clay The first two phases of this project, conducted over a seven-year Paris, Musée du Louvre. G 103 period, have allowed the Louvre and DNP to explore new © Photo DNP / Philippe Fuzeau approaches to art using digital and imaging technologies; the results have convinced them of the interest of this joint venture, which they now intend to pursue along different lines. Location : Louvre – DNP Museum Lab Ground Floor, DNP - Gotanda 3-5-20 Nishi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo The "Krater of Antaeus", one of the Louvre's must-see masterpieces, Opening period : provides a perfect illustration of the beauty and quality of Greek Friday February 1 to Sunday September 1, ceramics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mycenaean Ritual Vase from the Temple at Ayia Irini, Keos
    A MYCENAEAN RITUAL VASE FROM THE TEMPLE AT AYIA IRINI, KEOS (PLATE 18) D URING the 1963 excavations of the University of Cincinnatiat Ayia Irini, a number of fragments belonging to a curious and important Mycenaean vase were discovered in the Temple, mostly in Rooms IV and XI where they were found widely scattered in the post-Late Minoan IB earthquake strata.' Since it is impos- sible to date the vase stratigraphically, it is hoped that analysis of its shape and decoration may contribute something to our knowledge of the later history of the Temple in its Mycenaean period. Unfortunately, the vase is so fragmentary and its decoration so unstandardized that this is no simple task. It is the goal of this paper to look critically at the fragments and see what they suggest for the re- construction of the vase, its probable date and affinities, and its function in the Temple. Following two main lines of approach, we will first attempt a reconstruction of the shape and then analyze the pictorial decoration. Both are important in deter- mining date, possible provenience, and function. The fragments fall into three main groups: 1) those coming from the shoulder and upper part of an ovoid closed pot with narrow neck, now made up into two large fragments which do not join but which constitute about one-third the circumference (P1. 18 :a, b, c); 2) at least two fragments from the lower part of a tapering piriform shape (P1. 18 :d, d and e) ; 3) fragments of one or more hollow ring handles (P1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vases and Kalos-Names from an Agora Well
    VASES AND KALOS-NAMES FROM AN AGORA WELL A collection of graffiti on vases, found in a well in the Agora during the 1935 campaign,' has provided a fresh grouping of Attic kalos-inscriptions, and has added new names to the list. Our brief inspection of this material falls into three parts: we must consider the few figured pieces found in the well, the inscriptions as such, and the shapes of the vases, plain black-glazed and unglazed, on and in connection with which the inscriptions appear. The black-glazed table wares and substantial household furnishings with which the well was filled had only three figured companions. Of these the most interesting is illustrated in Figure 1. Preserved is more than half of one side of a double-disk, or bobbin.2 On it, Helios rising in his chariot drawn by winged white horses, is about to crest the sun-tipped waves. This theme, familiar from black-figured lekythoi, here finds its most elaborate expression. Our composition refines upon the solidity and power of the Brygos painter's Selene,3 to which it is most nearly related. The delicately curving wings of the horses, echoing the rim-circle, provide a second frame for the figlure of the god. Beneath the horses, all is tumult. Wave upon wave seems ready to engulf so dainty a team. But above, remote from confusions, stands the charioteer, confident and serene, his divine nature indicated by the great disk of the sun lightly poised upon his head. The contest between natural forces and the divine is a well-loved theme of Greek art; but it is rare to find, as liere, an element and not its personification.
    [Show full text]
  • From Boston to Rome: Reflections on Returning Antiquities David Gill* and Christopher Chippindale**
    International Journal of Cultural Property (2006) 13:311–331. Printed in the USA. Copyright © 2006 International Cultural Property Society DOI: 10.1017/S0940739106060206 From Boston to Rome: Reflections on Returning Antiquities David Gill* and Christopher Chippindale** Abstract: The return of 13 classical antiquities from Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) to Italy provides a glimpse into a major museum’s acquisition patterns from 1971 to 1999. Evidence emerging during the trial of Marion True and Robert E. Hecht Jr. in Rome is allowing the Italian authorities to identify antiquities that have been removed from their archaeological contexts by illicit digging. Key dealers and galleries are identified, and with them other objects that have followed the same route. The fabrication of old collections to hide the recent surfacing of antiquities is also explored. In October 2006 the MFA agreed to return to Italy a series of 13 antiquities (Ap- pendix). These included Attic, Apulian, and Lucanian pottery as well as a Roman portrait of Sabina and a Roman relief fragment.1 This return is forming a pattern as other museums in North America are invited to deaccession antiquities that are claimed to have been illegally removed from Italy. The evidence that the pieces were acquired in a less than transparent way is beginning to emerge. For example, a Polaroid photograph of the portrait of Sabina (Appendix no. 1) was seized in the raid on the warehousing facility of Giacomo Medici in the Geneva Freeport.2 Polaroids of two Apulian pots, an amphora (no. 9) and a loutrophoros (no. 11), were also seized.3 As other photographic and documentary evidence emerges dur- ing the ongoing legal case against Marion True and Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Pottery Gallery Activity
    SMART KIDS Greek Pottery The ancient Greeks were Greek pottery comes in many excellent pot-makers. Clay different shapes and sizes. was easy to find, and when This is because the vessels it was fired in a kiln, or hot were used for different oven, it became very strong. purposes; some were used for They decorated pottery with transportation and storage, scenes from stories as well some were for mixing, eating, as everyday life. Historians or drinking. Below are some have been able to learn a of the most common shapes. great deal about what life See if you can find examples was like in ancient Greece by of each of them in the gallery. studying the scenes painted on these vessels. Greek, Attic, in the manner of the Berlin Painter. Panathenaic amphora, ca. 500–490 B.C. Ceramic. Bequest of Mrs. Allan Marquand (y1950-10). Photo: Bruce M. White Amphora Hydria The name of this three-handled The amphora was a large, two- vase comes from the Greek word handled, oval-shaped vase with for water. Hydriai were used for a narrow neck. It was used for drawing water and also as urns storage and transport. to hold the ashes of the dead. Krater Oinochoe The word krater means “mixing The Oinochoe was a small pitcher bowl.” This large, two-handled used for pouring wine from a krater vase with a broad body and wide into a drinking cup. The word mouth was used for mixing wine oinochoe means “wine-pourer.” with water. Kylix Lekythos This narrow-necked vase with The kylix was a drinking cup with one handle usually held olive a broad, relatively shallow body.
    [Show full text]
  • Empty International Museums' Trophy Cases of Their Looted Treasures
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 36 Number 1 Winter Article 5 April 2020 Empty International Museums' Trophy Cases of Their Looted Treasures and Return Stolen Property to the Countries of Origin and the Rightful Heirs of Those Wrongfully Dispossessed Michael J. Reppas II Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Michael J. Reppas, Empty International Museums' Trophy Cases of Their Looted Treasures and Return Stolen Property to the Countries of Origin and the Rightful Heirs of Those Wrongfully Dispossessed, 36 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 93 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. EMPTY "INTERNATIONAL" MUSEUMS' TROPHY CASES OF THEIR LOOTED TREASURES AND RETURN STOLEN PROPERTY TO THE COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN AND THE RIGHTFUL HEIRS OF THOSE WRONGFULLY DISPOSSESSED MICHAEL J. REPPAS II * The discovery of the earliestcivilizations [in the 19 th Century] was a glorious adventure story.... Kings visited digs in Greece and Egypt, banner headlines announced the latestfinds, and thousandsflocked to see exotic artifactsfrom distant millennia in London, Berlin, and Paris. These were the pioneer days of archaeology,when excavators.., used battering rams, bruteforce, and hundreds of workmen in a frenzied searchfor ancientcities and spectacular artifacts. From these excavations was born the science of archaeology. They also spawned a past.I terrible legacy - concerted efforts to loot and rob the The ethical questions surrounding the acquisition and retention of looted property by museums and art dealers were once a subject reserved for mock-trial competitions in undergraduate humanities and pre-law classes.
    [Show full text]
  • This Pdf of Your Paper in Athenian Potters and Painters Volume III Belongs to the Publishers Oxbow Books and It Is Their Copyright
    This pdf of your paper in Athenian Potters and Painters Volume III belongs to the publishers Oxbow Books and it is their copyright. As author you are licenced to make up to 50 offprints from it, but be- yond that you may not publish it on the World Wide Web until three years from publication (August 2017), unless the site is a limited access intranet (password protected). If you have queries about this please contact the editorial department at Oxbow Books (editorial@ oxbowbooks.com). An offprint from Athenian Pot ters and Painters Volume III edited by John H. Oakley Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-663-9 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-664-6 © Oxbow Books 2014 Oxford & Philadelphia www.oxbowbooks.com Published in the United Kingdom in 2014 by OXBOW BOOKS 10 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford OX1 2EW and in the United States by OXBOW BOOKS 908 Darby Road, Havertown, PA 19083 © Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2014 Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-663-9 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-664-6 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Control Number: 2010290514 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher in writing. Printed in the United Kingdom by Short Run Press, Exeter For a complete list of Oxbow titles, please contact: UNITED KINGDOM Oxbow Books Telephone (01865) 241249, Fax (01865)
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 Winter 2014
    Volume 16 Winter 2014 Tomb 6423 At right, the Below is the A Digger’s View: lastra sealing chamber as The Tomb of the Hanging the chamber found at the The perspective of a field Aryballos, Tarquinia shown in situ. moment of archaeologist by Alessandro Mandolesi Above it is the opening, by Maria Rosa Lucidi another lastra on the back The University of Turin and the possibly reut- wall a little The discovery of the tomb of the Superintendency for the Archaeological ilzed spolia aryballos still “hanging aryballos" has aroused great Heritage of Southern Etruria have been interest among the public in both Italy taken from hangs on its investigating the Tumulus of the Queen and internationally. The integrity of the original nail. and the necropolis surrounding it, the the tumulus unviolated tomb is definitely one of the Doganaccia, since 2008. The excava- of the queen, (photographs reasons for the attention it has received. tions have brought forth many important which stands by Massimo The uniqueness is even more pro- and unexpected results, thanks to subse- nearby. Legni). nounced when one considers that since quent research, and the infor- the second half of the nine- mation relating to the differ- teenth century the English ent phases of its use has made traveler George Dennis it possible to clarify many blamed the inability to recov- obscure points about the great er the contexts from intact era of the monumental tumuli chamber tombs in Etruscan at Tarquinia. Tarquinia on repeated looting Archaeologists working since ancient times. The
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Without
    Culture Without The Newsletter of the Illicit Antiquities Research Centre Issue 20 , Spring 2007 _ .. 0 ~ The Illicit Antiquities Research Centre is a project of the Mc Donald Institute for Archaeological Research. Editorial announcement stated UCL's intention to publish th e report's conclusions, but thi s has not hap­ pened. Furthermore, UCL has recently informed have been asked several times recentl y about several people (myself included) that the report I the genesis o f the government's Illicit Trade is a confidential document and that UCL is not Advisory Panel, whose report in December 2000 able to enter into di scussions about its subject is genera ll y considered responsible for the United matter. No ex planation has been offered as to Kingdom's accession to the 1970 UN ESCO Con­ why UCL appears to have changed its mind over vention. For once, it is a question I can answer pub Iication . with some degree of authority. In April 2000, the On 9 March 2007 th e Schoyen Coll ection IARC was working with Mauri ce Da vies of the announced th at it was to commence legal pro­ Museums Association towa rds a fina l draft of ceedings against UCL for the return of the bowls. Stealing HistDlY, a report commissioned by the These legal proceedings have now concluded. On Museums Association and ICOM-UK to recom­ 26 June 2007 the Schoyen Coll ection and UCL mend guidelines for museums poli cy toward s issued ajoint press rel ease announcing that 'UCL the trade in cultural and natural materi als.
    [Show full text]