DOCSLIB.ORG

Tongass National Forest 2015 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tongass National Forest 2015 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Summary United States Department of Agriculture Tongass National Forest 2015 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Summary Forest Service Tongass National Forest R10-MB-811 June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Tongass National Forest 2015 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Summary Contents Monitoring Overview ............................................................................................................................... 1 Monitoring and Evaluation Program ........................................................................................................ 1 Physical and Biological Environment ........................................................................................................... 2 1. Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Climate Change ................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Biodiversity – Restocked Harvested Forest Lands .......................................................................... 5 4. Biodiversity – Habitat for Old-growth Associated Species ............................................................. 5 5. Biodiversity – Young-growth Treatments ....................................................................................... 7 6. Insects and Disease .......................................................................................................................... 8 7. Invasive Species – Status and Trends .............................................................................................. 8 8. Invasive Species – Prevention and Control...................................................................................... 9 9. Biodiversity Ecosystem – Old-growth Associated Species and Subspecies .................................. 11 10. Biodiversity Ecosystem – Change in Old-Growth by Biogeographic Province ......................... 11 11. Biodiversity Ecosystem – Old-Growth Matrix ........................................................................... 13 12. Biodiversity Ecosystem – Rare Plants ........................................................................................ 14 13. Stream-Fish Habitat – Management Indicator Species ............................................................... 16 14. Streams-Fish Habitat – Aquatic Habitat Condition (Fish Passage) ............................................ 18 15. Streams-Fish Habitat – Riparian Vegetation............................................................................... 20 16. Wildlife Terrestrial Habitat – Management Indicator Species.................................................... 22 17. Wildlife Terrestrial Habitat – Federally Listed Threatened or Endangered and Region-sensitive Species .................................................................................................................................................... 24 18. Wildlife Terrestrial Habitat – Geographic Distribution .............................................................. 25 19. Soil and Water – Soil Productivity ............................................................................................. 25 20. Soil and Water – State Water Quality Standards ........................................................................ 30 21. Soil and Water – Watershed Health ............................................................................................ 33 22. Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 36 23. Karst and Cave Ecosystems ........................................................................................................ 36 Human Uses and Land Management .......................................................................................................... 37 24. Timber Resources – Economic Timber Sales, Shelf Volume, and Contract Volume ................. 37 25. Timber Resources – Standards and Guidelines ........................................................................... 38 26. Timber Resources – Allowable Sale Quantity ............................................................................ 39 27. Timber Resources – Tongass Timber Reform Act ..................................................................... 40 28. Timber Resources – Adaptive Management Strategy Threshold................................................ 41 29. Timber Management – Non-interchangeable Components ........................................................ 41 30. Timber Management – Proportional Mix of Non-interchangeable Components I and II ........... 41 31. Transportation System ................................................................................................................ 42 32. Transportation System ................................................................................................................ 43 33. Mining and Minerals Exploration ............................................................................................... 45 34. Subsistence Management ............................................................................................................ 45 35. Wilderness ................................................................................................................................... 46 36. Heritage Resources ..................................................................................................................... 47 37. Recreation ................................................................................................................................... 48 38. Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ......................................................................................... 49 39. Scenery ........................................................................................................................................ 50 Economic and Social Environment ............................................................................................................. 51 40. Economics ................................................................................................................................... 51 41. Costs and Outputs ....................................................................................................................... 54 Program Contact ..................................................................................................................................... 55 i Tongass National Forest 2015 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Summary Monitoring Overview The 2015 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Report summarizes specific monitoring completed during fiscal year (FY) 2015 in accordance with the Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan (forest plan). Chapter 6 of the 2008 forest plan specified an annual written summary of forest-wide monitoring programs. Some monitoring protocols and questions were updated to better define and focus monitoring work during the completion of the 2008 Forest Plan amendment. Monitoring work is currently underway for most of the questions in this report. Monitoring is completed through years of data collection and evaluation. This report serves as the annual written summary of forest-wide monitoring program. A five- year summary of forest plan monitoring was completed in 2012. Changes relative to recommendations in the five-year evaluation and a transition to comply with the 2012 Planning rule is ongoing. The 2012 Planning Rule requires a biennial monitoring report instead of an annual report. The next scheduled
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Code of Practice for Wood Processing Facilities (Sawmills & Lumberyards)
    CODE OF PRACTICE FOR WOOD PROCESSING FACILITIES (SAWMILLS & LUMBERYARDS) Version 2 January 2012 Guyana Forestry Commission Table of Contents FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Wood Processing................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Development of the Code ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Scope of the Code ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Objectives of the Code ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Implementation of the Code ............................................................................................................. 10 2.0 PRE-SAWMILLING RECOMMENDATIONS. ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Market Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 General ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest History Oral History Project Minnesota Historical Society
    Marion Brown Narrator John Esse Interviewer October 29, 1975 Grand Rapids, Minnesota Marion Brown -MB John Esse -JE JE: This is October 29th, 1975 and were taping this morning up in the ProjectFirst National Bank Building which is presently our office space, and with us today is Marion Brown who is a one time resident of Deer River and who presides out in California for part of the time, part of the year, and who has a considerable amount of knowledge on the background of the railroad, mainly because he did work on the railroad and also of course I believeSociety Marion, raised in Deer River? History MB: Was born in Grand Rapids. JE: You were born in Grand Rapids, and thenOral your father? MB: Well moved to Deer River when I was aboutHistorical a year and a half old. JE: Okay, now how old are you now, when were you born? MB: Seventy three. History JE: So you were born? MB: September 3rd, 1902. JE: OkayForest now how didMinnesota your father get to Grand Rapids then? MB: Well my father came here originally in about 1898 I think it was, to teach school. He taught school in the Trout Lake area that was the Trout Lake by Coleraine. JE: Okay. MB: In fact he and my mother both taught in that area, that’s where they met, they taught at separate schools but they stayed with the same family, a family by the name of Faulkner. 1 JE: Uh huh. MB: Mrs. Faulkner, their daughter Bessie Faulkner was of course was a very good friend of my mothers and she is still living and her name is Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5--Commercial Lumber
    Chapter 5 Commercial Lumber Kent A. McDonald and David E. Kretschmann n a broad sense, commercial lumber is any lumber Contents that is bought or sold in the normal channels of Hardwood Lumber 5–1 commerce. Commercial lumber may be found in a variety of forms, species, and types, and in various commer- Factory Lumber 5–2 cial establishments, both wholesale and retail. Most com- Dimension and Component Parts 5–2 mercial lumber is graded by standardized rules that make purchasing more or less uniform throughout the country. Finished Market Products 5–6 When sawn, a log yields lumber of varying quality. To Lumber Species 5–7 enable users to buy the quality that best suits their purposes, Softwood Lumber 5–7 lumber is graded into use categories, each having an appro- priate range in quality. Lumber Grades 5–7 Lumber Manufacture 5–10 Generally, the grade of a piece of lumber is based on the number, character, and location of features that may lower the Softwood Lumber Species 5–12 strength, durability, or utility value of the lumber. Among Softwood Lumber Grading 5–12 the more common visual features are knots, checks, pitch pockets, shake, and stain, some of which are a natural part of Purchase of Lumber 5–12 the tree. Some grades are free or practically free from these features. Other grades, which constitute the great bulk of Retail Yard Inventory 5–16 lumber, contain fairly numerous knots and other features. Important Purchase Considerations 5–17 With proper grading, lumber containing these features is entirely satisfactory for many uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Fplgtr113.Pdf
    Abstract Summarizes information on wood as an engineering material. Presents properties of wood and wood-based products of particular concern to the architect and engineer. Includes discussion of designing with wood and wood-based products along with some pertinent uses. Keywords: wood structure, physical properties (wood), mechanical properties (wood), lumber, wood-based composites, plywood, panel products, design, fastenings, wood moisture, drying, gluing, fire resistance, finishing, decay, sandwich construction, preservation, and wood- based products On the cover: (Left to right, top to bottom) 1. Research at the Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin, contributes to maximizing benefits of the Nation’s timber resource. 2. Testing the behavior of wood in fire helps enhance fire safety. 3. The all-wood, 162-m (530-ft ) clear-span Tacoma Dome exemplifies the structural and esthetic potential of wood construction (photo courtesy of Western Wood Structures, Inc., Tualatin, Oregon). 4. Bending tests are commonly used to determine the engineering properties of wood. 5. Engineered wood trusses exemplify research that has led to more efficient use of wood. 6. The Teal River stress-laminated deck bridge is March 1999 located in Sawyer County, Wisconsin. 7. Kiln drying of wood is an important procedure Forest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook—Wood as an during lumber manufacturing. engineering material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL–GTR–113. Madison, WI: 8. Legging adhesive (photo courtesy of Air Products U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown Pennsylvania). Laboratory. 463 p. Adhesive bonding is a critical component in the A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the performance of many wood products.
    [Show full text]
  • ONE of the Largest Producing Lumber Companies in The
    THE WHEELER AND DUSENBURY LUMBER COMPANY OF FOREST AND WARREN COUNTIES; BY SAMUEL A. WILHELM ONE of the largest producing lumber companies in the north- western section of Pennsylvania during the nineteenth cen- tury, as well as one of the most exciting from the standpoint oE daring and pioneering activities, was the Wheeler and Dusenburv Lumber Company located at Stowtown (now Endeavor) in Forest County. This company, the first to open lumber operations along the Tionesta Creek section of Forest County on any noteworthy scale, started in 1837 and ended in 1939, a period of one hundred two years.1 William F. Wheeler, a dominant figure in the company, w\as brought up in a lumber-operating family. He was born in the town of Hancock, Delaware County, New York, on June 13, 1811, of parents who had migrated there from Blandford, Massachusetts.2 His father, in association with others, purchased and cut pinc timber on the hills overlooking the Delaware River and sent it for delivery in the market at Philadelphia. The first raft was " stoved," in raftmen's terms, that is, dashed to pieces and lost; but the owners, still with good credit, continued to cut timber and send it to Philadelphia. In 1813, the Wheeler family moved to Deposit, New York, which was fourteen miles from a tract of timber and sawmills owned by the father. Young William Wheeler's parents had intended that be should be a farmer, but, when the boy was fifteen years old, he went to Philadelphia with his father's lumber and at that time contracted a taste for rafts and the life of a lumberman.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Lumber, Round Timbers, and Ties David E
    CHAPTER 6 Commercial Lumber, Round Timbers, and Ties David E. Kretschmann, Research General Engineer When sawn, a log yields round timber, ties, or lumber of varying quality. This chapter presents a general discussion of grading, standards, and specifications for these commer- cial products. Contents Hardwood Lumber 6–2 In a broad sense, commercial lumber is any lumber that is Factory Lumber 6–2 bought or sold in the normal channels of commerce. Com- mercial lumber may be found in a variety of forms, species, Dimension and Component Parts 6–4 and types, and in various commercial establishments, both Finished Market Products 6–4 wholesale and retail. Most commercial lumber is graded by Lumber Species 6–6 standardized rules that make purchasing more or less uni- form throughout the country. Softwood Lumber 6–6 Lumber Grades 6–7 Round timbers and ties represent some of the most effi- cient uses of our forest resources. They require a minimum Lumber Manufacture 6–10 of processing between harvesting the tree and marketing Softwood Lumber Species 6–11 the structural commodity. Poles and piles are debarked or Softwood Lumber Grading 6–12 peeled, seasoned, and often treated with preservative prior to use as structural members. Construction logs are usually Purchase of Lumber 6–12 shaped to facilitate construction. Ties, used for railroads, Retail Yard Inventory 6–12 landscaping, and mining, are slab-cut to provide flat surfac- Important Purchase Considerations 6–17 es. Because these products are relatively economical to pro- duce compared with glulam, steel, and concrete products, Round Timbers and Ties 6–18 they are commonly used throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMERCIAL Green Lumber Dingess
    COMMERCIAL Green Lumber Northwest Hardwoods, Inc. Randolph Dingess Lumber Co., Inc. Barbour Tanner Lumber Co. Randolph Flooring Jim C. Hamer Co. Boone AFP Logs and Lumber Upshur Allegheny Dimension LLC Grant Braxton Lumber Co., Inc. Braxton Phillips Sawmill, Inc. Upshur Mullican Flooring, LP Greenbrier Pierson Lumber Co., Inc. Clay West Virginia Split Rail, Inc. Upshur Renick Millworks, LLC Greenbrier Hinzman Mill Works, Inc. Doddridge Woody Forest Products, Inc. Upshur Shingleton Quality Wood Products Hampshire American Timber Marketing Group, LLC Fayette Quality Lumber Wayne Hartland Planing Mill Co. Harrison Allegheny Wood Products Greenbrier Allegheny Wood Products Webster MCM Mouldings, Inc. Jackson Allegheny Wood Products Greenbrier Jim C. Hamer Co. Webster Quality Woods Kanawha Meadow River Hardwood Lumber Co., LLC Greenbrier Northwest Hardwoods, Inc. Webster Columbia Flooring Mingo Brent L. Combs Hampshire Mountain Craft Wide Plank Preston Shingleton Timber & Truck, Inc. Hampshire Sawmill Quality Woods, Inc. Putnam Brill's Lumber & Logging Hardy Dingess Lumber Co., Inc. Barbour Bruce Hardwood Flooring, LLC Randolph Facemyer Lumber Co., Inc. Jackson Jim C. Hamer Co. Boone Tygart Valley Industries, LLC Randolph Cabin Creek Lumber Co. Kanawha Appalachian Timber Services, Inc. Braxton Wilson Quality Millwork, Inc. Randolph Sugar Tree Lumber Co. Lincoln Braxton Lumber Co., Inc. Braxton DJM Hardwoods & Veneer, Inc. Mason STRATA Manufacturing, Inc. Braxton Moulding / Millwork Twin River Hardwoods Mason Pierson Lumber Co., Inc. Clay Allegheny Dimension LLC Grant Allegheny Wood Products Mercer Hinzman Mill Works, Inc. Doddridge Architectural Wood, LLC Greenbrier Kenneth E. Snider, Inc. Mercer American Timber Marketing Group, LLC Fayette Renick Millworks, LLC Greenbrier Kessel Lumber Products, Inc. Mineral Allegheny Wood Products Greenbrier Shingleton Quality Wood Products Hampshire Sisler Lumber Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Drying Hardwood Lumber
    United States Department of Agriculture Drying Hardwood Forest Service Forest Lumber Products Laboratory General Technical Joseph Denig Report Eugene M. Wengert − − FPL GTR 118 William T. Simpson Abstract Units of Measurement Drying Hardwood Lumber focuses on common methods for In this manual, measurements are expressed in both English drying lumber of different thickness, with minimal drying (inch–pound) and SI units. The following provides SI defects, for high quality applications. This manual also equivalents for lumber thickness sizes, dimension lumber, includes predrying treatments that, when part of an overall board foot volume, and other units. quality-oriented drying system, reduce defects and improve drying quality, especially of oak lumber. Special attention is given to drying white wood, such as hard maple and ash, without sticker shadow or other discoloration. Several special SI equivalents for lumber thickness sizes drying methods, such as solar drying, are described, and 3/4 19 mm proper techniques for storing dried lumber are discussed. 4/4 25 mm Suggestions are provided for ways to economize on drying costs by reducing drying time and energy demands when 5/4 32 mm feasible. Each chapter is accompanied by a list of references. 6/4 38 mm Some references are cited in the chapter; others are listed as 8/4 51 mm additional sources of information. 10/4 64 mm 12/4 76 mm Keywords: drying, hardwood, lumber, warp, kiln 14/4 89 mm 16/4 102 mm SI equivalents for dimension lumber Nominal (in.) Standard (mm) 2 by 4 38 by 89 2 by 6 38 by 102 2 by 10 38 by 165 September 2000 Denig, Joseph; Wengert, Eugene M.; Simpson, William T.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Products
    The Forest Products www.softwoodbuyer.com Vol. 28 No.4 The Softwood Industryʼs Only Newspaper...Now Reaching 39,725 firms (20,000 per issue) July/August 2013 Pacific Coast Welcomes Annual Builders Conference Photos By Teresa Fae San Diego, Calif.–Launched in 1959 as the Pacific Coast Builders Conference, tects, investors and PCBC brings together the housing industryʼs leading builders, developers, archi- product manufactur- ers for a two-day con- ference, product display and business exchange. This year, the San Diego Con- vention Center hosted the heavily at- tended event. In addition to hun- dreds of exhibitor booths that attendees Lance De Vol and Heath Staf, Boise Cascade, Boise, Idaho could peruse, also available were various informational sessions. Keynote guest addresses were pro- vided by two noted speakers. First, Richard Florida, a senior editor with The Atlantic, which covers urban design, transit, planning, jobs, housing and lifestyles internation- ally, offered his insight. Florida has championed what he refers to as the “creative class,” which he believes will invigorate cities rather than make an appeal to major Tom Scott, Brian Hurdle and Kevin Paldino, The Collins Companies, Portland, Ore. Additional photos on pages 10 & 12 Continued on page 25 NAWLA Leadership Conference SFPA Annual Meeting Hosts Expo University Addresses Lumber’s Path To Recovery Photos By Terry Miller Photos By Terry Miller Atlanta, Ga.–The Omni Hotel at CNN Palm Harbor, Fla.–“Big Ideas. Bold Impact. Big Thinking.” That was the title for Center, located here, the North recently hosted the an- American nual meeting of the Wholesale Southern Forest Prod- Lumber ucts Association Associa- (SFPA), which was at- tionʼs tended by 55 dele- (NAWLA) gates.
    [Show full text]
  • December 10, 2010 by Electronic Delivery Donald S. Clark Secretary Federal Trade Commission Room H-135 (Annex J) 600 Pennsylvani
    FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL UNITED STATES The mark of responsible forestry © FSC 1996 FSC-SECR-0004 By Electronic Delivery December 10, 2010 Donald S. Clark Secretary Federal Trade Commission Room H-135 (Annex J) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 RE: Proposed, Revised Green Guides, 16 CFR Part 260, Project No. P954501 Dear Mr. Clark, I submit the attached comments on behalf of the Forest Stewardship Council – United States, in response to the invitation of the Federal Trade Commission for comments on the proposed revisions to the Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims (the “Green Guides”), 75 Fed. Reg. 63551 (Oct. 15, 2010). We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and welcome any questions that the Commission or staff have as the Commission finalizes its Green Guides. Sincerely, Corey Brinkema, President cc: David C. Vladeck, Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection James A. Kohm, Associate Director, Division of Enforcement 212 Third Avenue North, Suite 504, Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 353-4511 WWW.FSCUS.ORG Forest Stewardship Council Response to Invitation for Comments on Proposed Green Guides These comments are submitted on behalf of the Forest Stewardship Council – United States (“FSC-US”), a not-for-profit organization established to promote responsible forest management, to provide comments in response to the invitation of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) for comments on the proposed revisions to the Commission’s Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims (the “Green Guides” or “Guides”), 16 C.F.R. Part 260, published in the Federal Register, 75 Fed. Reg. 63551, 63597-98 (Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Sawmill Operator's Manual
    01452 SMAL SAWMILi; OPERATOR MANUAL 5">>i~» J* Agriculture Handbook No. 27 n?' IE î^ U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Agriculture Handbook No. 27 January 1952 Approved for reprinting July 1958 SMALL SAWMILL OPERATOR'S MANUAL By C. J. TELFORD, Small Sawmill Specialist Forest Products Laboratory, Branch of Research, Forest Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D. C. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 65 cents ACKNOWLEDGMENT Acknowledgment is made of the assistance given by the following indi- viduals and firms in the form of technical data, advice, and many of the photo- graphs and drawings which appear in this manual: American Sawmill Machin- ery Co., Hackettstown, N. J. ; Andrus Manufacturers, Eugene, Oreg. ; Atkins, E; C, and Co., Cincinnati, Ohio ; Bowden, J. E., Alpha, Oreg. ; Chattanooga Saw Works, Chattanooga, Tenn.; Churchill, George, Drain, Oreg.; Corinth Machinery Co., Corinth, Miss.; Corley Manufacturing Co., Chattanooga, Tenn. Crabb Gas Engine Co., Independence, la.; Disston, Henry, Sons Inc., Phil- adelphia, Pa.; Enterprise Co., Columbiana, Ohio; Forano Co., Ltd., Plessisville, Quebec, Canada ; Farquhar, A. B., Co., Ltd., York, Pa. ; Fisher-Davis Co., St. Louis, Mo. ; Foshee, H. B., Jacksonville, Fla. ; Frick Co., Waynesboro, Pa. ; Fug- lie, E. A., Winona, Minn.; Gordon Hollow Blast Grate Co., Greenville, Mich.; Hallock, Hiram, Madison, Wis. ; Hanchett Co., Big Rapids, Mich. ; Hart Bros. Machinery Co., Clarksburg, W. Va. ; Hoe, R., and Co., Inc., New York, N. Y. ; Howell R. R., and Co., Minneapohs, Minn. ; Ireland Mill and Supply Co., Cayuta, N. Y. ; Jackson Box Co., Black River Falls, Wis. ; Jackson Harvester, Inc., Brew- ton, Ala.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Wood-Framed Building Deconstruction and Reused Wood Building Materials Companies, 2005
    United States Department of Agriculture Directory of Wood-Framed Forest Service Building Deconstruction Forest Products Laboratory and Reused Building General Technical Materials Companies, 2005 Report FPL−GTR−150 Abstract Acknowledgment This is a directory of companies involved in wood-framed Thanks to Vicki Hall, former FPL employee, who helped building deconstruction, dismantling and reused building create the first list of companies from which this directory materials, with an emphasis on those that use, resell, and/or evolved. re-manufacture salvaged wood. Companies in this directory range in scope from those that carryout targeted building removals, such as historic barns, strictly for the purpose of harvesting the antique wood in these buildings, to companies Contents that conduct residential and commercial demolition where the primary goal is building removal, and the recovery of Page materials is conducted opportunistically as a by-product. The Preface ..................................................................................i bulk of companies listed are those that either salvage or sell building materials. For ease of use, the directory lists com- Wood-Framed Deconstruction and Building panies two ways, alphabetically by state and then alphabeti- Materials Salvage: An Overview ......................................... 1 cally by company type, and alphabetically by company type and then alphabetically by state. Telephone Survey Results.................................................... 1 Keywords: deconstruction, used
    [Show full text]