DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Landscape & Visual Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Central and Eastern Berkshire Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Strategic Landscape & Visual Assessment July 2020 (Proposed Submission) Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 Study Aim .......................................................................................................................... 5 Potential Allocations .......................................................................................................... 5 Policy Context ................................................................................................................... 6 National Policy ............................................................................................................... 6 Local Policy and Landscape Character Assessment ...................................................... 6 2. Bracknell Forest Local Planning Authority Area ............................................................. 8 Local Planning Policy ........................................................................................................ 8 Landscape Character Assessment .................................................................................... 8 3. Wokingham Borough Council Local Planning Authority Area ......................................... 9 Local Planning Policy ........................................................................................................ 9 Landscape Character Assessment .................................................................................. 10 4. Windsor and Maidenhead Local Planning Authority Area ............................................. 21 Local Planning Policy ...................................................................................................... 21 Landscape Character Assessment .................................................................................. 21 Glossary.............................................................................................................................. 59 Appendix 1: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology ................................ 63 Landscape Character Assessments ................................................................................ 63 Methodology for Site Assessments .................................................................................. 63 Desk Study .................................................................................................................. 63 Field Study ................................................................................................................... 63 Data Analysis and Presentation of Results ................................................................... 64 Mitigation and restoration ............................................................................................. 64 Landscape Character ................................................................................................... 64 Defining threshold criteria sensitivity levels .................................................................. 65 Assessment Structures ................................................................................................ 72 Appendix 2: Bracknell Forest Policies ................................................................................. 74 Appendix 3: Wokingham Policies ........................................................................................ 76 Appendix 4: Windsor & Maidenhead Policies ...................................................................... 81 Prepared by Hampshire Services © Crown copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 100018817 Hampshire County Council Derived from 1:50000 scale BGS Digital Data www.hants.gov.uk/sharedexpertise under Licence 2011/049F, British Geological Survey ©NERC Executive Summary This report has been produced to give an overview of the site assessment process that was used to carry out the Strategic Landscape and Visual Assessment (SLVA). The findings of the assessment will be used to inform potential site allocations in the Central and Eastern Berkshire Joint Minerals and Waste Plan (JMWP). A SLVA was prepared in 2018 to support the Draft Plan which was subject to consultation. This SLVA takes into account the comments received on the Draft Plan and updates on the potential allocations. Since the Draft Plan consultation, a number of sites have gained planning permission and are no longer considered within this assessment, namely: Poyle Quarry, Riding Court Farm and Water Oakley (subject to legal agreements). In addition, further sites were identified and assessed for their suitability for inclusion in the JMWP. The assessments of these sites are set out in this report. This section provides an overview of the likely impact on visual and landscape character of each of the proposed site allocations to support the JMWP. Mitigation measures are also outlined which could be put in place to offset those effects which have been identified. Central and Eastern Berkshire comprises the four Unitary Authorities: Bracknell Forest Council, Reading Borough Council, the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead and Wokingham Borough Council. For ease of reference, the sites have been listed: first by Local Planning Authority (LPA) area; second by the site code and, third by proposed type of site (either Waste management or Mineral extraction). Windsor and Maidenhead LPA has the highest number of sites assessed, having two proposed Waste and six proposed Minerals sites. Wokingham LPA has one Minerals site proposed. There are no proposed allocations In Bracknell Forest LPA or Reading LPA Key for both Landscape Character and Visual Impact Slight Positive Slight Positive Neutral Neutral Slight Adverse Slight adverse Moderate Adverse Moderate Adverse Large Adverse Large Adverse Strategic Landscape and Visual Assessment (July 2020) 1 Summary of Site Assessments Site Site name Likely Likely Key Issues and Mitigation measures Code Landscape Visual Effects Effects Bracknell Forest LPA Waste / Minerals N/A Wokingham LPA Mineral CEB7 Bridge Farm Large Large Phased extraction and restoration may limit the overall impact of mineral extraction on the (Withdrawn) Adverse Adverse character of the landscape. Visual impacts could be mitigated by advanced planting of screening vegetation along the roads and footpaths. The hedgerow along the A325 Reading Road needs to be thickened to provide a greater screen. The fields adjacent to the River Loddon are very sensitive and an ever diminishing landscape resource. If extraction is required, they should be restored to agriculture and not to water bodies. River side pasture is becoming a rare habitat in this area and ponds are abundant. This site will impact a number of footpaths: ARBO FP 21, 22II, 20II & 20III. These paths will need to be protected and given adequate space to remain without being confined into narrow corridors created by high mounds. The paths should be a minimum of 5m wide and include views out over the landscape. Small scale sequential extraction and restoration is required to minimise visual effects All woodland and hedgerows with trees should be protected by leaving wide buffers to ensure their long-term health and viability. Restoration should include recreating the original field boundaries and planting hedgerows Waste N/A Windsor and Maidenhead LPA Mineral Strategic Landscape and Visual Assessment (July 2020) 2 Summary of Site Assessments Site Site name Likely Likely Key Issues and Mitigation measures Code Landscape Visual Effects Effects CEB16 Ham Island Large Large The Island is in the Thames floodplain in a highly sensitive location (Not allocated in Adverse Adverse There are residential areas on and adjoining the island, plus a horse rescue centre. the Proposed There are archaeological remains within the site. Submission Busy recreational routes (River Thames and Thames Path) run past the site. Plan) Road access, consisting of a narrow single-track lane, already used for sewage works access, passes through a residential area of Old Windsor. Limited development, linked to water transport, may be acceptable, provided adequate screen planting is included to protect the residential and recreational environment. CEB18 Poyle Quarry Slight Slight The site consists mainly of existing arable fields with pylons running through. Aircraft fly low, Extension Areas Adverse Adverse directly overhead. Sensitivities include Colnbrook village (Conservation Area) and proposed housing site to north, nature reserve to south, and the Colne Valley Way footpath route (Hort/4) which adjoins its west side. Heathrow Hilton to west adjoins the proposed new access route. It will be essential for adequate space for strong new landscape structure to be included in any proposals. CEB26 Monkey Island Moderate Slight The site is adjacent The Cut channel, close to the River Thames, and Bray Lake Recreation Area. Lane Wharf, Adverse Adverse A high level of public access in this area raises sensitivity. Bray Public access should be accommodated alongside the development. Existing landscape structures should be strengthened, including waterside vegetation, to integrate new structures. CEB27 Bray Quarry Moderate / Moderate The site is close to the edge of Bray village and conservation area,
Recommended publications
  • Bpnp Pre-Submission Consultation Public and Statutory Body Responses and Outcomes

    Bpnp Pre-Submission Consultation Public and Statutory Body Responses and Outcomes

    BPNP PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION PUBLIC AND STATUTORY BODY RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES This document summarises the responses received from the public and from statutory consultees to the pre-submission consultation of the BP Neighbourhood Plan. While every effort has been made to reflect the representations in a full, fair and balanced manner, this document is only intended to provide a summary (the representations are also available in their entirety, referenced by number). This document also sets out the BPNP Steering Group's comments to the responses received and any outcomes resulting. SOME RELEVANT DATE POLICY / No. METHOD POST CODE ADDRESS NAME E-MAIL SUMMARY OF RESPONSE RECEIVED CONSIDERATIONS & OTHER BPNP SG COMMENTS & OUTCOMES RECEIVED SECTION FACTORS RESIDENTS CONSULTATION RESPONSES On-Line 26 Court Close, Agree. Give thought to any possible future fracking. If sited sympathetically 19-May-15 SL6 2DL P.J.N. Harvey [email protected] BE15 R01 Survey Maidenhead it may provide healthy income for the Parish without negative consequences. Agree. There should be a footpath from Holyport village all the way to TI4 Holyport College. Cycle routes should not have frequent give way stops. The whole point of easy cycling is to get going and keep going. Agree. However I am concerned that from time to time some of our lovely village pubs put up marquees and close for private functions. My view is that these premises have insufficient facilities for these type of events (parking On-Line Glen Eyre, Holyport 20-May-15 SL6 2EY Mr R.T. Gibson [email protected] E3 and WC in particularly) and should not prohibit their usual customers.
  • Jealott's Hill, Warfield Technical Summary

    Jealott's Hill, Warfield Technical Summary

    JEALOTT’S HILL, WARFIELD TECHNICAL SUMMARY/OVERVIEW NOTE ON ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES Executive Summary Development at the Jealott’s Hill site offers the opportunity to create extensive areas of new species and wildflower-rich mesotrophic grassland, through the reversion of arable land and through the diversification of existing improved grassland currently in agricultural use. Small patches of existing more diverse semi-improved grassland around the current research campus buildings could also form the basis of a significant project to create or restore new areas of ‘lowland meadow’ priority habitat; either through their retention and positive management in situ to promote enhancement, or through the use of the soil seed bank in these areas to diversify larger parts of the rural hinterland of the estate currently in agricultural use. Existing species-rich hedgerows can also be subject to positive future management using traditional conservation-friendly methods such as laying, with older hedgerows prioritised for retention within the layout, and new species-rich native hedgerows planted in conjunction with the proposals. Existing ponds can be subject to ecological restoration to improve their suitability for a range of species including aquatic invertebrates, amphibians, foraging bats and hunting Grass Snake. The habitats present both on site and in the wider area are likely to support a range of fauna of varying ecological importance including; amphibians, reptiles, breeding and overwintering birds (particularly farmland birds), mammals such as bats and Badgers, and invertebrate assemblages. The scale of the proposals and large areas of proposed Green Infrastructure being brought forward will provide the means to deliver new habitat for these species and this will be informed by further ecological survey work in due course.
  • Environmental Report SA/SEA

    Environmental Report SA/SEA

    Central and Eastern Berkshire Authorities Joint Minerals and Waste Plan Environmental Report SA/SEA July 2020 Contents Non Technical Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................... 26 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 26 1.2 The SA/SEA Process ..................................................................................................... 27 1.3 Meeting the requirements of the SEA Directive ............................................................. 30 1.4 Requirements of SA ....................................................................................................... 32 1.5 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) ...................................................................... 32 1.6 JMWP Background ........................................................................................................ 33 1.7 JMWP Vision .................................................................................................................. 34 2. Stage A Scoping Appraisal Findings ................................................................................. 36 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 36 2.2 Task A1 Review of Plans
  • Rare Plant Register

    Rare Plant Register

    1 BSBI RARE PLANT REGISTER Berkshire & South Oxfordshire V.C. 22 MICHAEL J. CRAWLEY FRS UPDATED APRIL 2005 2 Symbols and conventions The Latin binomial (from Stace, 1997) appears on the left of the first line in bold, followed by the authority in Roman font and the English Name in italics. Names on subsequent lines in Roman font are synonyms (including names that appear in Druce’s (1897) or Bowen’s (1964) Flora of Berkshire that are different from the name of the same species in Stace). At the right hand side of the first line is a set of symbols showing - status (if non-native) - growth form - flowering time - trend in abundance (if any) The status is one of three categories: if the plant arrived in Britain after the last ice age without the direct help of humans it is defined as a native, and there is no symbol in this position. If the archaeological or documentary evidence indicates that a plant was brought to Berkshire intentionally of unintentionally by people, then that species is an alien. The alien species are in two categories ● neophytes ○ archaeophytes Neophytes are aliens that were introduced by people in recent times (post-1500 by convention) and for which we typically have precise dates for their first British and first Berkshire records. Neophytes may be naturalized (forming self-replacing populations) or casual (relying on repeated introduction). Archaeophytes are naturalized aliens that were carried about by people in pre-historic times, either intentionally for their utility, or unintentionally as contaminants of crop seeds. Archaeophytes were typically classified as natives in older floras.
  • Draft Plan Consultation Paper Is Supported by a Number of Reports Which Set out the Evidence for the Contents Provided

    Draft Plan Consultation Paper Is Supported by a Number of Reports Which Set out the Evidence for the Contents Provided

    Central and Eastern Berkshire Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Draft Plan Consultation Paper June 2018 Prepared by Hampshire Services © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Hampshire County Council Ordnance Survey 100018817 Derived from 1:50000 scale BGS Digital www.hants.gov.uk/sharedexpertise Data under Licence 2011/049F, British Geological Survey ©NERC About this document and the Draft Plan consultation Central and Eastern Berkshire – Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Local Planning Authorities have a statutory responsibility to prepare and maintain an up-to-date local plan. Bracknell Forest Council, Reading Borough Council, the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham Borough Council (collectively referred to as the ‘Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities’) are working in partnership to produce a Joint Minerals & Waste Plan which will guide minerals and waste decision-making in the Plan area for the period up to 2036. The Joint Minerals & Waste Plan will build upon the formerly adopted minerals and waste plans for the Berkshire area, and improve, update and strengthen the policies and provide details of strategic sites that are proposed to deliver the vision. The currently adopted minerals and waste plans for the Berkshire area1 are the Replacement Minerals Local Plan for Berkshire, adopted in 1995 and subsequently adopted alterations in 1997 and 20012 (including Appendices3 and saved policies4) and the Waste Local Plan for Berkshire adopted in 19985 (including saved policies). The Minerals Local Plan and Waste Local Plan cover the administrative areas of the Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities, as well as Slough Borough Council and West Berkshire Council. While these plans cover the period until 2006, the Secretary of State has directed that a number of policies in them should be saved indefinitely until replaced by national, regional or local minerals and waste policies.
  • Strategic Landscape & Visual Assessment

    Strategic Landscape & Visual Assessment

    Central and Eastern Berkshire Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Strategic Landscape & Visual Assessment June 2018 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6 2. Bracknell Forest Local Planning Authority Area ................................................... 8 Local Planning Policy .............................................................................................. 8 Landscape Character Assessment ......................................................................... 8 3. Wokingham Borough Council Local Planning Authority Area ............................ 14 Local Planning Policy ............................................................................................ 14 Landscape Character Assessment ....................................................................... 14 4. Windsor and Maidenhead Local Planning Authority Area .................................. 24 Local Planning Policy ............................................................................................ 25 Landscape Character Assessment ....................................................................... 25 Glossary of Terms………………………………………………………………………….65 Appendix 1: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Methodology..................... 63 Landscape Character Assessments ....................................................................
  • JCEB Plan Consultation Document Proposed Submission V6 June 2020

    JCEB Plan Consultation Document Proposed Submission V6 June 2020

    Central and Eastern Berkshire Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Proposed Submission Plan July 2020 Prepared by Hampshire Services © Crown copyright and database rights Hampshire County Council 2019 Ordnance Survey 100018817 Derived from 1:50000 scale BGS Digital www.hants.gov.uk/sharedexpertise Data under Licence 2011/049F, British Geological Survey ©NERC About the Proposed Submission Plan Central and Eastern Berkshire – Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Local Planning Authorities have a statutory responsibility to prepare and maintain an up-to-date local plan. Bracknell Forest Council, Reading Borough Council, the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham Borough Council (collectively referred to as the ‘Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities’) are working in partnership to produce a Joint Minerals & Waste Plan which will guide minerals and waste decision-making in the Plan area for the period up to 2036. The Joint Minerals & Waste Plan will build upon the currently adopted minerals and waste plans for the Berkshire area, and improve, update, and strengthen the policies and provide details of strategic sites that are proposed to deliver the vision. The currently adopted minerals and waste plans for the Berkshire area are the Replacement Minerals Local Plan for Berkshire, adopted in 1995 with subsequently adopted alterations in 1997 and 20011 and the Waste Local Plan for Berkshire adopted in 19982. The Minerals Local Plan and Waste Local Plan cover the administrative areas of the Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities, as well as Slough Borough Council and West Berkshire Council. While these plans covered the period until 2006, the Secretary of State directed that a number of policies in them should be saved indefinitely until replaced by national, regional or local minerals and waste policies.
  • Berkshire Lowland Unimproved Grassland BAP 1999-2005

    Berkshire Lowland Unimproved Grassland BAP 1999-2005

    July 1999 Berkshire Lowland Unimproved Grassland BAP 1999-2005 BERKSHIRE LOWLAND UNIMPROVED GRASSLAND BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Produced by English Nature on behalf of the Berkshire Nature Conservation Forum Coordinator - Sarah Davies Compiler - Jo Lewis Contributors - Sarah Davies, Graham Steven, Wanda Fojt This plan covers the three main types of Lowland Grassland habitat found in Berkshire - calcareous , neutral (MG5) and acid grasslands. These botanically rich grasslands have escaped agricultural improvement or development and now represent an important and scarce resource which was once much more widespread. Unimproved grasslands are rich, diverse habitats supporting a wide range of plants and animals. They have very high conservation value in terms of contribution to overall biodiversity but also have significant aesthetic, historic and recreational value. Wet neutral grasslands of high botanical interest (eg MG4, MG8, MG11, MG 13) and/or of high interest for breeding birds (MG10) are not covered by this action plan but can be found in the River Valley Habitats Action Plan. Similarly, acid grassland where it occurs as a mosaic with heathland is covered by the Heathland Action Plan. 1 CURRENT STATUS SSSIs are designated under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 with the aim of identifying and protecting sites which 1.1 In Europe represent the best examples of all the natural habitats found in this country. Dry semi-natural lowland grasslands, which were once widespread in Europe, are now a In compliance with the Convention on scarce and threatened habitat. There are no Biological Diversity (1992 Earth Summit) the overall estimates available for extent of this UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UKBAP) lays out type of habitat in Europe as a whole but losses national strategies for the protection and to development and agricultural intensification sustainable use of Biodiversity.

  • Windsor and Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Windsor and Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy: Strategic Environmental Assessment - Draft Environmental Report Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead January 2015 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft for Final consultation Date October 2014 January 2015 Prepared by Russell Buckley Russell Buckley Signature Checked by Victoria Wilson Victoria Wilson Signature Authorised by Victoria Wilson Victoria Wilson Signature Project number 62003420 62003420 Report number 1 1 File reference London London Project number: 62003420 Dated: January 2015 2 Windsor and Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy: Strategic Environmental Assessment - Draft Environmental Report Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead January 2015 Client Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Consultant Russell Buckley WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Tel: +44 (0)20 7406 7190 Fax: +44 (0)20 7314 5111 www.wspgroup.com Registered Address WSP UK Ltd 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF WSP Contacts [email protected] Project number: 62003420 Dated: January 2015 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................ 5 2 Appraisal Methodology ........................................................ 12 3 Section 2: Environmental Objectives, Baseline and Context 16 4 The SEA Framework ........................................................... 25 5 Results from the assessment .............................................. 31 6 Next Steps ........................................................................... 38 Appendix A: Review of Plans and Programmes Appendix B: Environmental Baseline Appendix C: SEA Matrices Appendix D: Scoping Report Consultation Outcomes Project number: 62003420 Dated: January 2015 4 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose of this Report 1.1.1. The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) is in the process of developing its Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS).

  • Aakanksha Sinha Report Environmental Permit Variation

    Environmental Permit Variation Application Slough Heat and Power Station Application Supporting Document Slough Heat and Power Limited Project reference: 60578218 Project number: 60578218.005 60578218-ACM-PM-RP-EN-001-A 14 April 2020 Environmental Permit Variation Application Project reference: 60578218 Project number: 60578218.005 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Aakanksha Sinha Helen Watson Mark Webb Mark Webb Principal Consultant Associate Director Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Initial draft 10/03/2020 Client review Helen Watson Helen Watson Project Manager Final 14/04/2020 Issue Helen Watson Helen Watson Project Manager Prepared for: Slough Heat and Power Limited AECOM Environmental Permit Variation Application Project reference: 60578218 Project number: 60578218.005 Prepared for: Slough Heat and Power Limited Andrew Ellis 342 Edinburgh Avenue Slough SL1 4TU Prepared by: Aakanksha Sinha Principal Consultant T: +441133012442 E: [email protected] AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 5th Floor, 2 City Walk Leeds LS11 9AR United Kingdom T: +44 (0)113 391 6800 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.

  • Interim SA/SEA Report

    Central & Eastern Berkshire Authorities Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Interim SA/SEA Report June 2018 Contents Non Technical Summary .............................................................................................. 1 Cumulative Effects (Inter Plan) .................................................................................. 18 1. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................... 21 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 21 1.2 The SA/SEA Process ..................................................................................... 22 1.3 Meeting the requirements of the SEA Directive .............................................. 25 1.4 Requirements of SA ....................................................................................... 26 1.5 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) ....................................................... 27 1.6 JMWP Background ......................................................................................... 27 1.7 JMWP Vision .................................................................................................. 29 2. Stage A Scoping Appraisal Findings ................................................................. 31 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 31 2.2 Task A1 Review of Plans and Policies ...........................................................

  • Minerals: Proposal Study

    Central and Eastern Berkshire Joint Minerals & Waste Plan Minerals: Proposal Study July 2020 (Proposed Submission Plan) Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 What this study includes ......................................................................................... 4 What this study does not include ............................................................................ 5 Further information .................................................................................................. 6 2. Background and Context ..................................................................................... 7 3. Minerals Site Proposals ....................................................................................... 8 How the proposals were compiled .......................................................................... 8 Sustainability Appraisal (incorporating SEA) ..................................................... 21 Habitats Regulation Assessment ....................................................................... 21 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment ...................................................................... 21 4. Mineral site assessments .................................................................................. 22 Sand and Gravel Proposals .................................................................................