DOCSLIB.ORG

Edge of Settlement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edge of Settlement Borough Local Plan Edge of Settlement Part 2 Constraints, Opportunities and Delivery Assessment July 2016 Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 3 Purpose of the study 3 Edge of Settlement - Part 1 Green Belt Purpose Assessment 4 Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 4 2 Policy context 7 National Planning Policy Framework 7 National Planning Practice Guidance 7 National Planning Policy for Waste 8 Borough Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation (January 2014) 8 Summary: policy context 11 3 Methodology 12 Stage 4: Constraints, opportunities and delivery considerations 13 4 Conclusions 15 Stage 5: Presenting the assessment 15 Appendicies A Glossary 17 B Consultation statement 19 C Summary of constraint considerations 28 D Summary of opportunity considerations 33 E Assessment pro-forma 36 F Parcel assessments 40 A3 - Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot 40 A6 - Land including Ascot Railway Station car park, Station Hill, Ascot 46 A7 - Land south of Hermitage Parade, High Street, Ascot 52 A8 - Land west of St. George's Lane, including Shorts Recycling, Ascot 59 A20 - Sacred Heart Church, London Road, Sunningdale 65 C9 - Land between Southwood Road and Lower Mount Farm, Long Lane, Cookham Rise 70 C12 - Land east of Strande Park Caravan Park, Cookham Rise 75 D3 - Land north of Eton Road, adjacent to St. Augustine's Church, Datchet 80 D4 - Land between Slough Road and the M4, south east of allotments, Datchet 86 D5 - Land north and east of Churchmede Secondary School, Priory Road, Datchet 91 D6 - Land enclosed by London Road, the M4 and Riding Court Road, Datchet 97 D7 - Land south of Austin Way, Langley 102 E4 - Land south of Eton Wick Road, comprising Eton College sports ground, Eton 107 Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 Contents H2 - Land west of Crown Meadow, Brands Hill 113 M2 - Land known as Spencer's Farm, north of Lutman Lane, Maidenhead 119 M5 - Land east of Whitebrook Park, Lower Cookham Road, north of Islet Park Drive, Maidenhead 125 M7 - Maidenhead Sailing Club, Summerleaze Road, Maidenhead 131 M8 - Summerlease office and workshop, Summerleaze Road, Maidenhead 136 M12 - Land north of Bradcroft Lane and south of the raiwlay line, Maidenhead 142 M16 - Land east of Woodlands Park Avenue, north of Woodlands Business Park Maidenhead 148 M20 - Land south of Manor Lane including Shoppenhangers Manor and Manor House, Maidenhead 154 M21 - Land enclosed by Kimbers Lane, Harvest Hill Road, A308(M) and A404(M), Maidenhead 160 M22 - Triangle enclosed by M4, A308(M) and Ascot Road, Maidenhead 166 M23 - Maidenhead Golf Course, Shoppenhangers Road, Maidenhead 172 M24 - Braywick Park extending to Hibbert Road, Maidenhead 179 M25 - Land south of Stafferton Way, Maidenhead 185 M35 - Land between Windsor Road and Bray Lake, Maidenhead 192 M38 - Land west of Monkey Island Lane, including water treatment works, Maidenhead 198 W1 - Land north of A308, south of Maidenhead Road, Windsor 204 W2 - Land south of A308, north of Dedworth Road, Windsor 210 WR1 - Land south of The Drve, Wraysbury 216 WR2 - Land south of Old Ferry Drive, Wraysbury 222 WR5 - Land including Tithe Farm, Tithe Lane, Wraysbury 228 Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 3 Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead is preparing a new Borough Local Plan. This will set out the vision and framework for future development, addressing needs and opportunities in relation to housing, the economy, community facilities and infrastructure - as well as a basis for safeguarding the environment, adapting to climate change and securing good design. 1.2 It is important that the Borough Local Plan is based on a good understanding of future development needs and opportunities. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) says that: 1. Plans should positively seek opportunities to meet development needs, and 2. Plans should meet objectively assessed needs unless: - the impact of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole, or - specific policies in the Framework indicate that development should be restricted.(1) 1.3 Accordingly the Council is taking the detailed step of reviewing existing planning designations (for example employment land, retail need and Green Belt). It should be understood that the act of reviewing a designation does not in itself indicate that the designation will change, that is a review can find the existing designation remains valid. Purpose of the study 1.4 This assessment is the second half of a two stage process which considers the suitability of land on the edge of settlements which are themselves excluded from the Green Belt for development.(2) This process supersedes that undertaken in 2014.(3) 1.5 The purpose of this Part 2 assessment is to consider a wide range of factors including constraints, opportunities and matters which affect the suitability, availability and achievability of development. 1.6 In broad terms this Part 2 assessment will: Assess how individual parcels of land perform against a wider range of factors; and Identify those areas which are more or less suitable for development. 1.7 It is important to note that this Part 2 assessment does not allocate land for development nor does it imply that land is suitable for development. The NPPF makes it clear that in order to make changes to the Green Belt boundary there have to be "exceptional circumstances."(4) Such a consideration must be informed by a number of other documents and reports including those on future housing and economic development needs, decisions on spatial strategy and public consultation, in addition to this assessment. Study purpose at a glance What it will do What it won't do Identify areas which are more or less suitable, Set future development requirements available and achievable for development Amend the boundary of the Green Belt Indicate whether exceptional circumstances exist which support the alteration to the boundary of the Green Belt Allocate land for development 1 NPPF, paragraph 14. 2 See the below sub-section Edge of Settlement Analysis: Part 1 Green Belt Purpose Assessment. 3 Edge of Settlement Analysis January 2014. 4 NPPF, paragraph 83. 4 Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 1 Introduction Edge of Settlement - Part 1 Green Belt Purpose Assessment 1.8 The Edge of Settlement: Part 1 Green Belt Purpose Assessment constituted the first half of the two stage process which considered the suitability of land on the edge of settlements by specifically considering how land currently designated Green Belt performs against the purposes of Green Belt as defined in the NPPF.(5) 1.9 The outcome of the Part 1 assessment was the identification of parcels of land which perform less well against the purposes of the Green Belt. In summary: Fifteen parcels were found as making a none/limited or lower contribution to the purposes of the Green Belt. Three additional parcels were assessed as performing an important role but provided opportunities to support regeneration or community initiatives. Fifteen parcels were assessed as making a moderate performance to one or more purposes. Sixty five parcels were assessed as performing strongly or very strongly to the purposes of the Green Belt. 1.10 Maps showing these parcels are provided on the following pages. Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 1.11 The outcome of the Edge of Settlement Analysis Part 1 and Part 2 studies will feed into the Council's Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA). The HELAA is a technical study of all potential housing, economic and retail sites. It performs the following functions: it identifies potential sites for housing, employment and retail from a variety of different sources; it gives an indication of the potential overall scale of land that may be available for development; it looks at their suitability for housing, employment and retail use, with likely timescales for deliverability; and it does not make policy decisions or allocate sites but informs plan making. 1.12 The requirement for a HELAA is set out in paragraph 159 of the Framework and in the Department for Community and Local Government (DCLG) Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) under the section ‘Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment’, which provides detailed guidance on how to carry out a HELAA. The HELAA presents a strategic picture of the availability and suitability of land for development, providing a key component of the evidence base to inform the preparation of the new Local Plan. It attempts to establish realistic assumptions about the number of homes, employment and retail floorspace that this land could yield and the timeframe within which this might come forward. 5 NPPF, paragraph 80 states that Green Belt serves the five purposes: to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas; to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another; to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment; to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 5 Introduction 1 Map 1 Parcels assessed as performing last well against the purpose of Green Belt and parcels which provided an opportunity to support regeneration initiatives. 6 Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 1 Introduction Map 2 Parcels assessed as making a moderate performance to one or more purposes of Green Belt. Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 7 Policy context 2 POLICY CONTEXT National Planning Policy Framework 2.1 In England, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) sets out the government’s policy on planning including the context in which Local Plans must be prepared.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Budget 2018/19
    Budget 2018/19 ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR AND MAIDENHEAD BUDGET 2018/19 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR……………………………………………………... 5 GENERAL STATISTICS………………………………………………………………………………… 7 SUMMARIES AND STATEMENTS …………………………………………………………………... 13 Council Tax for all Bands of Property………………………………………………………………… 15 Parish Precepts………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 Subjective Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………… 18 Collection Fund………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 Revenue Budget Movement Statement……………………………………………………………… 21 Medium Term Financial Plan………………………………………………………………………….. 22 General Fund Cost Direct Cost Budget Summary & Working Balances………………………… 24 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT - DIRECT COST Managing Director - Direct Cost Summary & Details………………………………………..…… 27 Communities Directorate - Direct Cost Summary & Details…………………………………….. 57 Place Directorate - Direct Cost Summary & Details……………………………………………… 81 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT - FULL COST Full Cost Budget Summaries………………………………………………………………………….. 95 FEES & CHARGES ……………………….…………………………………………………………….. 105 Managing Director……………………………………………………………………………………. 107 Place Directorate……………………………………………………………………………. 115 Communities Directorate…………………………………………………………………………….. 118 CAPITAL PROGRAMME ………………..……………………………………………………………. 145 Summary Capital Programme………………………………………………………………………… 147 Managing Director ………………………………………………………………………………….. 148 Communities Directorate ….…………………………………….…………………………………. 151 Place Directorate …………………………………………………..……………………………….. 158 GLOSSARY OF TERMS…………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword
    Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Submission version Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword Foreword by Leader of the Council and the Lead Member for Planning We are delighted to present the Borough Local Plan for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The Borough Local Plan promotes a sustainable pattern of development for the Borough until 2033. The new development that is proposed in this plan aims to provide for new housing and affordable housing to fulfil the needs of all of our residents, whilst at the same time protecting our valued natural and built historic environment and assets. The plan aims to protect and enhance those elements that make our Borough special in the eyes of not only our residents but all those who choose to visit, work and invest in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. We are privileged to be home to one of the most recognisable and valued historic assets in the country, Windsor Castle and the Windsor Great Park which the Borough Local Plan seeks to protect not only for our own benefit but also for future generations. The Borough Local Plan is based on a substantial and robust evidence base and on the results of the consultation exercises we have carried out in the past, as guided by national policy and legislation. We have worked with partners including our neighbouring local authorities, statutory bodies and local communities and agencies, as well as considering the many emerging and adopted Neighbourhood Development Plans being prepared by parishes and neighbourhood forums. Planning often presents difficult choices and requires a balance of national policy and local wishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Contextual Data at the University of Warwick Please Use
    Use of contextual data at the University of Warwick Please use the table below to check whether your school meets the eligibility criteria for a contextual offer. For more information about our contextual offer please visit our website or contact the Undergraduate Admissions Team. School Name School Postcode School Performance Free School Meals 'Y' indicates a school which meets the 'Y' indicates a school which meets the Free School Meal criteria. Schools are listed in alphabetical order. school performance citeria. 'N/A' indicates a school for which the data is not available. 6th Form at Swakeleys UB10 0EJ N Y Abbey College, Ramsey PE26 1DG Y N Abbey Court Community Special School ME2 3SP N Y Abbey Grange Church of England Academy LS16 5EA Y N Abbey Hill School and Performing Arts College ST2 8LG Y Y Abbey Hill School and Technology College, Stockton TS19 8BU Y Y Abbey School, Faversham ME13 8RZ Y Y Abbeyfield School, Northampton NN4 8BU Y Y Abbeywood Community School BS34 8SF Y N Abbot Beyne School and Arts College, Burton Upon Trent DE15 0JL Y Y Abbot's Lea School, Liverpool L25 6EE Y Y Abbotsfield School UB10 0EX Y N Abbotsfield School, Uxbridge UB10 0EX Y N School Name School Postcode School Performance Free School Meals Abbs Cross School and Arts College RM12 4YQ Y N Abbs Cross School, Hornchurch RM12 4YB Y N Abingdon And Witney College OX14 1GG Y NA Abraham Darby Academy TF7 5HX Y Y Abraham Guest Academy WN5 0DQ Y Y Abraham Moss High School, Manchester M8 5UF Y Y Academy 360 SR4 9BA Y Y Accrington Academy BB5 4FF Y Y Acklam Grange
    [Show full text]
  • Academy Schools
    Service Name Service Area Provided Academy Schools Asbestos Burchetts Green CE Infant School Premises & Facilities Val Derrett 8/06/2016 Register Asbestos Knowl Hill CE Primary Academy School Premises & Facilities Miles Woodhouse 14/06/2016 Register Asbestos St Lukes CE Primary School Premises & Facilities Charlotte Watson 7/06/2016 Register Asbestos St Marys Catholic Primary Academy Premises & Facilities Neelam Chawla 7/06/2016 Register Asbestos St Peters CE Middle School Premises & Facilities Mrs Sidnam 9/06/2016 Register Asbestos Maureen Carlton, Mark Eymor The Windsor Boys' School Premises & Facilities Register 24/05/2016 Asbestos White Waltham C of E Academy Premises & Facilities Miles Woodhouse 8/06/2016 Register Asbestos Windsor Girls' School Premises & Facilities Nicola Lovett 10/06/2016 Register Asbestos Datchet St Marys Primary Premises & Facilities Register Rupert Blackley 21/06/2016 Asbestos Dedworth Middle School Premises & Facilities Register Mike Hazell 21/06/2016 Asbestos Holyport CE Primary Premises & Facilities Register Jo Hargreeves 27/06/2016 Asbestos Newlands Girls School Premises & Facilities Register Nick Piggott 23/06/2016 LQ Asbestos Audit & Re-inspection Date Row Labels Maintained Schools Alexander First School LQ & T Searle Type 2 & R&D 20/04/2016 All Saints CE Junior School Rob Andrews 22/07/2016 Bisham CE Primary School Varsha Sidpara 14/07/2016 Boyne Hill Infants & Nursery School Declan McKenna 18/07/2016 Braywood CE First School Sam Moore 4/07/2016 Cheapside CE Primary School Sue Ellis 11-7-2016 Churchmead
    [Show full text]
  • Bpnp Pre-Submission Consultation Public and Statutory Body Responses and Outcomes
    BPNP PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION PUBLIC AND STATUTORY BODY RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES This document summarises the responses received from the public and from statutory consultees to the pre-submission consultation of the BP Neighbourhood Plan. While every effort has been made to reflect the representations in a full, fair and balanced manner, this document is only intended to provide a summary (the representations are also available in their entirety, referenced by number). This document also sets out the BPNP Steering Group's comments to the responses received and any outcomes resulting. SOME RELEVANT DATE POLICY / No. METHOD POST CODE ADDRESS NAME E-MAIL SUMMARY OF RESPONSE RECEIVED CONSIDERATIONS & OTHER BPNP SG COMMENTS & OUTCOMES RECEIVED SECTION FACTORS RESIDENTS CONSULTATION RESPONSES On-Line 26 Court Close, Agree. Give thought to any possible future fracking. If sited sympathetically 19-May-15 SL6 2DL P.J.N. Harvey [email protected] BE15 R01 Survey Maidenhead it may provide healthy income for the Parish without negative consequences. Agree. There should be a footpath from Holyport village all the way to TI4 Holyport College. Cycle routes should not have frequent give way stops. The whole point of easy cycling is to get going and keep going. Agree. However I am concerned that from time to time some of our lovely village pubs put up marquees and close for private functions. My view is that these premises have insufficient facilities for these type of events (parking On-Line Glen Eyre, Holyport 20-May-15 SL6 2EY Mr R.T. Gibson [email protected] E3 and WC in particularly) and should not prohibit their usual customers.
    [Show full text]
  • SEND Steering Board Tuesday 23 April 2019, 10.00 Am - 12.00 Pm Maidenhead Project Centre, Reform Road
    SEND Steering Board Tuesday 23 April 2019, 10.00 am - 12.00 pm Maidenhead Project Centre, Reform Road Present: Kevin McDaniel (Interim Chair)- Director of Children’s Services Liz Kelsall (Vice-Chair) – Chair of PaCiP Sarah Bellars – Director of Nursing and Quality, Clinical Commissioning Group Cllr N. Airey – Lead Member for Children’s Services RBWM Helen Hannam – Deputy Head Teacher, Manor Green School Alison Crossick – Associate Director for Inclusion (Interim) Karen Cridland – Director of Children’s Service, BHFT Hannah Golec (Minutes) - Business Support Team Leader for CYPDSm Early Help and Education, AfC Apologies: Joolz Scarlett – Head Teacher, Manor Green School Chris Tomes – Head Teacher, Churchmead School Jennifer Humphreys – Communications and Marketing Officer, RBWM Louise Kerfoot – Learning Disability Service Manager (Optalis) Janette Fullwood – Head of CYP&F Clinical Commissioning Group Debbie Hartrick – Designated Clinical Officer SEND, Clinical Commissioning Group Minutes 1. Welcome and apologies The Steering Board agreed for Kevin McDaniel to chair this meeting. Helen Hannam attended as a representative for Joolz Scarlett. The Steering Board reported that a primary school representative is needed now that Nick Stevens, former Head teacher of Riverside Primary School, has left the borough. 2. Minutes of last meeting, actions and matters arising The minutes from the SEND Steering Board meeting on Tuesday 19 March 2019 were reviewed for accuracy and for actions outstanding: ● Alison Crossick to create a headline powerpoint - Alison Crossick reported this action is halfway complete and will be presented at the next Steering Board. ● Hannah Golec to circulate information about Helios to the SEND Steering Board - action complete. 1 ● Inclusion Summit Planning Group - Alison Crossick discussed the progress with Suki Hayes and whether further input is required from senior management.
    [Show full text]
  • Jealott's Hill, Warfield Technical Summary
    JEALOTT’S HILL, WARFIELD TECHNICAL SUMMARY/OVERVIEW NOTE ON ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES Executive Summary Development at the Jealott’s Hill site offers the opportunity to create extensive areas of new species and wildflower-rich mesotrophic grassland, through the reversion of arable land and through the diversification of existing improved grassland currently in agricultural use. Small patches of existing more diverse semi-improved grassland around the current research campus buildings could also form the basis of a significant project to create or restore new areas of ‘lowland meadow’ priority habitat; either through their retention and positive management in situ to promote enhancement, or through the use of the soil seed bank in these areas to diversify larger parts of the rural hinterland of the estate currently in agricultural use. Existing species-rich hedgerows can also be subject to positive future management using traditional conservation-friendly methods such as laying, with older hedgerows prioritised for retention within the layout, and new species-rich native hedgerows planted in conjunction with the proposals. Existing ponds can be subject to ecological restoration to improve their suitability for a range of species including aquatic invertebrates, amphibians, foraging bats and hunting Grass Snake. The habitats present both on site and in the wider area are likely to support a range of fauna of varying ecological importance including; amphibians, reptiles, breeding and overwintering birds (particularly farmland birds), mammals such as bats and Badgers, and invertebrate assemblages. The scale of the proposals and large areas of proposed Green Infrastructure being brought forward will provide the means to deliver new habitat for these species and this will be informed by further ecological survey work in due course.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Systematic List
    SyStematic LiSt Bird report for 2000–2001 observers Please see the list of contributors at the end of this report to whom we extend our thanks. abbreviations and place names The normal abbreviations are shown below in the table. For place names difficulties arise where there are several names for the same sites including where, for example, a gravel pit complex is named but not the individual pit. A map and guide to the main sites is included towards the end of the report to assist with identification. age/Sex pLaceS/ LocaLitieS ad adult com Common f/s First summer cp Country Park f/w First winter (plumage) fm Farm imm Immature gc Golf course Juv Juvenile gp Gravel Pit(s) m Male res Reservoir pr pair r. River f or fem Female Sf Sewage Farm r/h Redhead StW Sewage Treatment Works r/t Ringtail S/p Summer plumage e Berks East Berkshire S/s Second summer m.Berks Mid Berkshire S/w Second winter W Berks West Berkshire W/p Winter plumage dorney W Dorney Wetlands W Winter K&a Kennet and Avon 3/s Third summer Qmr Queen Mother Reservoir 3/w Third winter In an attempt to show the national status of our breeding birds, any species that is protected under Schedule One of the Wildlife and Countryside Act and any species that may be red or amber listed in the most recent list of Birds of conservation concern for the UK will have the species status placed in brackets after the county status which precedes the species account.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted
    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVED Projects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERS Projects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTS Approved projects at main contract awarded stage. Planning authority: Rugby Job: Outline Developer: Ian H Bix & Associates, Sandpiper Road Wythall £13.35m Properties Ltd Agent: Malcolm Tempest Ltd, Christopher Street, London, EC2A 2BS Tel: Humberside, HU13 9PB Tel: 101 01482 326415 Plans Submitted for 5 houses Client: Mr. House, Leete Way, West Winch, King’s Lynn, Planning authority: Bromsgrove Job: High Parks, Newton-le-Willows, Bedale, 020 7843 3199 KNARESBOROUGH £1M Contracts MIDLANDS/ EAST Brian Swan Agent: Mrs. Beverley Bates, 25 Norfolk, PE33 0ST Tel: 01553 844077 Reserved Matters Granted for 174 houses & 4 North Yorkshire, DL8 1TP Tel: 01677 450777 HULL £10M St James Retail Park, Grimbald Crag Main Road, Kilsby, Rugby, Warwickshire, CV23 NOTTINGHAM £1M bungalows Client: Miller Homes (East BEDLINGTON £1.05M Carlam Hill Farm, Carlam Lane Wawne Road BARNSLEY £7.275M ANGLIA 8XR Tel: 01788 822486 Cafe and residential Units, Clifton Lane Midlands) Agent: Miller Homes (East Land South Of Red House Farm E, Red Planning authority: Kingston-Upon-Hull Planning authority: Harrogate Job: Detail Land at, Ellwood Off Wilson SOLIHULL £0.5M Planning authority: Nottingham Job: Detail Midlands), 2 Centro Place, Pride Park, Derby, House Farm Estate Job: Detailed Plans Submitted for solar Plans Granted
    [Show full text]
  • Apts-School Govs
    SCHEDULE B DETAILS OF CANDIDATES Criteria for Appointment LEA governors will be chosen on the basis of the contribution they can bring to a school in terms of their skills and experience as specified in their nomination form, taking account of any supporting information provided by the candidate or by the school. NAME/OCCUPATION PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE REASONS FOR APPLICATION CANDIDATES SEEKING APPOINTMENT AS LEA REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNORS Mr Ian Allix Governor of Wessex Junior School 1988 - The candidate feels that his experience outside Accountant present. Has attended 3 out of a possible 6 education and as a governor are still of value main governors’ meetings in the past year, and to the school. The nomination is supported by (Wessex Junior School) serves on one sub-committee. the headteacher. ONE appointment Also served 4 years as a governor at Newlands Girls’ School. Ms Pamela Bailey Governor of The Princess Margaret Royal Has a great interest in education and would Management Consultant Free School 1992 - 2000. very much like to continue working in the Member RBWM Twinning Committee 1993 - community supporting a Windsor school. (Any Windsor, preferably Church, School) present. Believes that her experience in business ONE appointment Mayoress 1991 - 1992. management will enable her to make a Eucharistic Minister at St Edward’s, Windsor positive contribution to the work of a Knowledge of IT industry and ICT in governing body. education. Mrs Molly Baker Governor of Alexander First school 1988 to Enjoys the responsibility of helping Alexander Admin. Assistant present. Currently Vice Chairman of First School, which she believes has never governors and Chairman of Finance been an easy school of which to be a governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Consultation December 2022 2 | Timetable Consultation December 2022
    Timetable consultation December 2022 2 | Timetable Consultation December 2022 Contents 3 Foreword 4 About this consultation South Western Railway 5 who we are and what we do 7 About Network Rail 8 Context 12 Passenger forecasts Route by route specifications 16 Main Suburban routes 21 Windsor routes 27 Mainline routes 14 34 West of England routes 37 Island Line routes 37 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads 37 Heart of Wessex 39 Outcomes 41 FAQs 42 Feedback questions and how you can respond 43 What happens next? Some images in this document were taken before Covid. 3 | Timetable Consultation December 2022 Foreword We are acutely aware that in the past we have responded to ever growing customer demand by increasing the number of trains on the South Western Railway (SWR) network, often at the expense of the performance and reliability of our services. But, as we emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic, we have a unique opportunity to build back a better railway for the future. Since March 2020, we have been supported by SWR, Network Rail and the Department for the Government to run a reduced service that has Transport are therefore undertaking a strategic kept key workers moving. This period has shown review of our timetable. We are proposing changes that our performance improves significantly when which, while resulting in a slight reduction in we are able to run fewer trains while still meeting frequencies, will still deliver capacity at 93% of customer demand for our services. Customer pre-Covid levels and improve significantly on the satisfaction has also increased in this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Churches to Reflect on ‘Life in All Its Fullness’ by Jo Duckles
    www.oxford.anglican.org March 2018 No. 300 thedoor Tim discovers community organising page 11 Win a book see centrespread the Door – have your say page 3 Meet Margot Hodson page 16 Churches to reflect on ‘life in all its fullness’ By Jo Duckles THE Bishop of Oxford is calling on Christians across the diocese to join him in reflecting on the story of the raising of Lazarus this Lent. The Rt Revd Steven Croft is encouraging everyone to read the story, told in John 10 and 11. He has written Abundant Life – a series of 21 reflections, also available as podcasts, to accompany the Bible readings. The Abundant Life resources are accompanied by a verse and response style prayer and the piece of artwork pictured, which was created by Oxford based artist, Tom Bower. The booklet is selling like hot cakes. A fun companion booklet, GodVenture through the Life Of Lazarus, complete with stickers, is being used by 2,000 families. It comes hot on the heels of Exploring the Beatitudes – a three session course launched late last year. 4,000 copies have already been ordered with more than 300 small groups using the resource. In a recent blog, Bishop Steven wrote: “Lent began in the early Church as 40 days of preparation time for new Christians to prepare for baptism at Easter. The whole Church started to keep this 40 days to go back to the heart of the gospel and walk with the candidates as they prepared for this life-changing moment. “Christians give up things for Lent as a spiritual discipline, remembering the 40 days Jesus fasted in the wilderness.
    [Show full text]