DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Reg 18 Report November 2016 Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Regulation 18 Report LC-273 Document Control Box Client Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Report Title Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 Status Final Filename LC-273_RBWM_SA_Report_9_301116RC.docx Date November 2016 Author RB & RC Checked FG Approved ND Front credit: Windsor Caste by Jean-Marc Astesana Sustainability Appraisal for the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 November 2016 LC-273_RBWM_SA_Report_9_301116RC.docx About this report & Notes for reader Lepus Consulting Ltd (Lepus) has prepared this draft report for sites, conservation areas, flood risk areas and watercourses, and the use of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. There the range of uses taking place. The assessment was prepared are a number of limitations, which should be borne in mind when between October and November 2016 and is subject to and considering the results and conclusions of this report. No party limited by the information available during this time. should alter or change this report whatsoever without written permission from Lepus. This report has been produced to assess the sustainability effects © Lepus Consulting Ltd of the Emerging Local Plan. It is not intended to be a substitute for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Appropriate SEA and SA are tools for predicting potential significant effects. Assessment (AA). For further information on the differences The actual effects may be different from those identified. between the products please see: Prediction of effects is made using an evidence-based approach https://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/environmentalassessment_tc and incorporates a judgement. m9-257008.pdf The assessments above are based on the best available Client comments can be sent to Lepus using the following information, including that provided to Lepus by the Council and address. information that is publicly available. No attempt to verify these 1 Bath Street, secondary data sources has been made and they have assumed Cheltenham to be accurate as published. Gloucestershire GL50 1YE Every attempt has been made to predict effects as accurately as Telephone: 01242 525222 possible using the available information. Many effects will E-mail: [email protected] depend on the size and location of development, building design www.lepusconsulting.com and construction, proximity to sensitive receptors such as wildlife © Lepus Consulting for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead i Sustainability Appraisal for the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 November 2016 LC-273_RBWM_SA_Report_9_301116RC.docx This page is deliberately blank. © Lepus Consulting for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ii Sustainability Appraisal for the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 November 2016 LC-273_RBWM_SA_Report_9_301116RC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 The RBWM Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 .................................................................................. 2 1.4 About RBWM ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Policies ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.6 Sites .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.7 Strategic Locations ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.8 Strategic Scenarios ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.9 Using this document .............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Approach to assessment ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Appraisal process .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Geographic scale .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Impact magnitude .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.5 Assumptions and limitations to assessment ............................................................................... 12 3 Assessment of policies ................................................................................................ 18 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 18 3.2 SP 1 Spatial Strategy for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead .................... 18 3.3 SP 2 Community Led Development ............................................................................................... 19 3.4 SP 3 Design .............................................................................................................................................. 19 3.5 SP 4 Townscape and Landscape ................................................................................................... 20 3.6 SP 5 River Thames Corridor ............................................................................................................. 20 3.7 SP 6 Development in the Green Belt ............................................................................................. 21 3.8 SP 7 Countryside character ............................................................................................................... 21 3.9 HO 1 Housing Development Sites ................................................................................................... 22 3.10 HO 2 Meeting housing need .............................................................................................................. 22 3.11 HO 3 Affordable Housing .................................................................................................................. 23 3.12 HO 4 Gypsies and Travellers ............................................................................................................ 23 3.13 HO 5 Housing layout and design .................................................................................................... 24 3.14 HO 6 Density and Amenity ............................................................................................................... 24 3.15 HO 7 Sub Division of Dwellings ...................................................................................................... 25 3.16 HO 8 Development involving residential gardens ................................................................... 26 3.17 HO 9 Extensions and outbuildings in residential curtilages ................................................ 26 3.18 ED 1 Economic Development ............................................................................................................ 27 3.19 ED 2 Defined Employment Sites ..................................................................................................... 27 3.20 ED 3 Other sites and loss of employment floorspace ........................................................... 28 3.21 TR 1 Hierarchy of centres .................................................................................................................. 28 3.22 TR 2 Windsor town centre ................................................................................................................ 29 3.23 TR 3 Maidenhead town centre ........................................................................................................ 29 3.24 TR 4 District centres ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.25 TR 5 Local centres ............................................................................................................................... 30 3.26 TR 6 Strengthening the Role of centres ....................................................................................... 31 3.27 TR 7 Shops and parades outside of defined centres ............................................................. 32 3.28 TR 8 Markets .......................................................................................................................................... 32 3.29 VT 1 Visitor Development .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachments, Bridge Platforms? • Design Aspects: Include In/ 200M of the Station
    Option Selection Report Version 1 Project Name: Crossrail Step Free Access Langley Mainline Railway Station OP Reference: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Sponsor/Client: Crossrail Project Manager: Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Version: 01 Date: 19/12/2013 Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 OPTIONS REPORT & CONCEPT DESIGNS 2 2.1 Selected Option 4 2.1.1 Station Access 5 2.1.2 Platform Access 5 2.2 Discarded Options 5 2.2.1 Viable Options 5 2.2.2 Non Viable Options 6 2.3 Constructability Assessment 6 2.4 Access and Possession Strategy 7 2.5 Project Schedule 7 2.6 Whole Life Cost Assessment of Options 7 2.7 Estimates (excluding whole life costings) 8 2.8 QRA 8 2.9 Risk Register 8 2.10 Assumptions 8 2.11 Signed Design Compliance Certificate 8 2.12 Asset Condition Surveys / GI / Topographical 8 3 INTERFACES WITH OTHER PROJECTS 8 4 CDM INFORMATION 9 5 SAFETY VERIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 9 6 CONSENTS STRATEGY 10 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 10 8 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS STRATEGY 10 9 ENGINEERING OUTPUTS 10 10 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 11 FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF SELECTED OPTION BY CLIENT, FUNDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS 11 APPENDICES 12 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Version: 01 Date: 19/12/2013 APPENDICES A. Information received B. Description of accessible route C. Listing of works required D. Photos E. Drawings F. Risk register G. Information required H. Hazard log I. Investigation reports / summaries J. Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Version: 01 Date: 19/12/2013 Issue Record Issue No Brief History Of Amendment Date of Issue 00 Draft Issue 06/12/2013 01 First Issue 19/12/2013 Distribution List Name Organisation Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 597 23 June 2015 No. 21 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 23 June 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 735 23 JUNE 2015 736 is my right hon. Friend taking to support such charities House of Commons and to ensure that offenders leave prison ready to face the world of work? Tuesday 23 June 2015 Michael Gove: I commend my hon. Friend for raising the work of those two voluntary sector organisations. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Without the work of voluntary and third sector organisations, we would not be able to provide the educational and rehabilitative services that enable people PRAYERS who are currently in our prisons to have a second chance. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Michael Fabricant: Not just voluntary services have a role to play, but private businesses such as Marks & Spencer, and indeed other well known department stores. Does my right hon. Friend agree that we should encourage Oral Answers to Questions private enterprise to help in the rehabilitation of offenders to get them back to work? Michael Gove: I absolutely agree—that is a very good JUSTICE point. May I single out for praise the John Lewis Partnership, which does such a fantastic job in helping people from a variety of backgrounds to be all they can The Secretary of State was asked— be? I stress that there are other organisations, such as Greggs the bakers and, of course, Timpson, the shoe Prisoner Rehabilitation Services and key repair firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Slough Local Plan (Adopted March 2004)
    Slough Local Plan (adopted March 2004) Saved Policies and Policies still in use at December 2010 Key Policies not in use are struck-through as follows Policy X - not saved at September 2007 Policy X - no longer implemented at 08/09 AMR – superseded by the Core Strategy DPD Policy X - no longer implemented at 09/10 AMR – superseded by the Site Allocations DPD Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION AND STRATEGY PAGE1 No. Chapter 2: HOUSING 9 Housing Objectives Introduction Overall Housing Allocation Policy H1 (Housing Allocation) 10 Components of the Housing Provision Housing Capacity of the Slough Urban Area Green Belt Sites Policy H2 (Housing Sites) 14 Policy H3 (Additional Housing Sites) 14 Phasing Policy H4 (Phasing) 15 Local Housing Needs Policy H5 (Social Housing) 17 Policy H6 (Other Forms of Affordable Housing) 18 Town Centre Policy H7 (Town Centre Housing) 19 Loss of Potential Housing Land and Existing Residential Accommodation Policy H8 (Loss of Housing) 19 Future Residential Provision Policy H9 (Comprehensive Planning) 20 Housing Densities Policy H10 (Minimum Density) 21 Conversions and Changes of Use from Commercial to Residential Policy H11 (Change of Use to Residential) 22 Residential Area of Exceptional Character Policy H12 (Residential Areas of Exceptional Character) 23 Backland/Infill Development Policy H13 (Backland/Infill Development) 24 Amenity Space Policy H14 (Amenity Space) 25 Extensions to Existing Residential Properties Policy H15 (Residential Extensions) 26 Development within the Residential Curtilage Policy H16 (Garages, Outbuildings,
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Consultation December 2022 2 | Timetable Consultation December 2022
    Timetable consultation December 2022 2 | Timetable Consultation December 2022 Contents 3 Foreword 4 About this consultation South Western Railway 5 who we are and what we do 7 About Network Rail 8 Context 12 Passenger forecasts Route by route specifications 16 Main Suburban routes 21 Windsor routes 27 Mainline routes 14 34 West of England routes 37 Island Line routes 37 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads 37 Heart of Wessex 39 Outcomes 41 FAQs 42 Feedback questions and how you can respond 43 What happens next? Some images in this document were taken before Covid. 3 | Timetable Consultation December 2022 Foreword We are acutely aware that in the past we have responded to ever growing customer demand by increasing the number of trains on the South Western Railway (SWR) network, often at the expense of the performance and reliability of our services. But, as we emerge from the Covid-19 pandemic, we have a unique opportunity to build back a better railway for the future. Since March 2020, we have been supported by SWR, Network Rail and the Department for the Government to run a reduced service that has Transport are therefore undertaking a strategic kept key workers moving. This period has shown review of our timetable. We are proposing changes that our performance improves significantly when which, while resulting in a slight reduction in we are able to run fewer trains while still meeting frequencies, will still deliver capacity at 93% of customer demand for our services. Customer pre-Covid levels and improve significantly on the satisfaction has also increased in this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue.Pdf
    Barnett Ross THURSDAY 9TH MAY 2013 At The Radisson Blu Portman Hotel 22 Portman Square London W1H 7BG Commencing at 12.00 p.m. Light refreshments served at 11.30 a.m. AUCTION 9TH MAY 2013 Auctioneers J. Barnett FRICS J. L. G. Ross MRICS Tel: 020 8492 9449 Fax: 020 8492 7373 Notice to all Bidders 1. Please note the General Conditions of Sale which are included with this catalogue and the Special Conditions of Sale which are available on request. An Addendum will be made available on the Auction Day and the bidder should check whether the lot which he/she is interested in bidding for is included. 2. Prospective purchasers are assumed to have inspected the properties in which they are interested and to have made all usual pre-contract searches and enquiries. 3. The successful Bidder is Bound under Contract as soon as the Auctioneer’s gavel falls on his/her final bid. Immediately thereafter the successful Bidder will be handed a Form to fill out supplying details of his/her name and address together with (if different) the name and address of the purchaser and those of his/her solicitors. He/she must also supply a cheque for the deposit, which we will hold at our office. The bidder will be given our bank account details and must arrange to transfer the deposit monies to our client bank account the following day by way of a ‘same day CHAPS payment.’ Once these funds are received we will return the bidder’s cheque by post. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Edited0001
    PLANS. PROTESTS. PROHIBITIONS. The original call for a Railway came from Bristol. Ever growing volumes of goods and necessity of their prompt delivery to London became a matter of urgency. Waterways were almost the only means, by Kennet and Avon Canal to Reading, then by Thames to the metropolis. Terribly slow, entirely dependant on the weather, frost could close the Canal, floods wreck the barges, and in a dry season waters too shallow to negotiate. The Bristol merchants had seen the invention of the steam engine and the opening of the first railway - Liverpool to Manchester in 1850. A Committee was set up. The designer of the Clifton Suspension Bridge, Isambard Kingdom Brunei, was asked to investigate the possibility of a railway link to London. He presented his proposals and then was approved a go-ahead to raise the money and to apply to Parliament for the necessary powers. The estimate was £2.805.350. to build 120 miles of railroad, taking 4 to 5 years. Opposition came from the Commissioners of Thames Navigation who would lose tolls and in some cases were interested landowners, Canal managers, and dtage-coach proprietors, plus a few towns who thought they were being left out of prospective advantages. A Bill was presented to Parliament but opposition caused it to be thrown out. Controversy continued for two more years. Only a quarter of the money had been raised. A decision was then made to apply by another Bill to construct from London to Reading with a Branch to Windsor. More heated opposition. Oxford University joined in.
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex Route Study: Final
    Long Term Planning Process Wessex Route Study August 2015 Contents Page August 2015 Network Rail – Wessex Route Study 02 Foreword 03 Executive Summary 04 Introduction 14 Consultation Responses 20 Baseline 24 Conditional Outputs 46 Accommodating the Conditional Outputs 69 Summary 120 Appendix A - Appraisal Results 137 Appendix B - CP6 Scheme Details 141 Glossary 152 Foreword August 2015 Network Rail – Wessex Route Study 03 We are delighted to present this Wessex Route Study, which sets out Network Rail has led the production of this Route Study on behalf of the strategic vision for the future of this vital part of the rail network the Industry and as such it has been developed collaboratively with over the next 30 years. industry partners and wider stakeholders including passenger and freight operators, the Department for Transport, Transport for Each weekday this railway carries more than 50,000 people in the London, Local Authorities and Local Enterprise Partnerships. We high peak hour alone into central London, with many thousands thank them all for their contribution. more accessing key interchange points and travelling between regional centres on the Route. Even before future growth is considered, some services on the route are already carrying significant numbers of passengers in excess of realistic capacity. Standing is commonplace from Woking and Basingstoke, with passengers standing from as far away as Winchester on fast Paul Plummer Tim Shoveller services to London Waterloo. Group Strategy Director Managing Director Significant volumes of freight traffic are conveyed on the route, with the majority of movements focused on the busy corridor between Network Rail Stagecoach South Western Trains the Port of Southampton and the Route boundary north of Basingstoke (on the Basingstoke to Reading line).
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill As Amended in the House of Commons Select Committee
    HIGH SPEED TWO PHASE ONE INFORMATION PAPER B10: HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL AS AMENDED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE This paper outlines the amendments made to the High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill by the Select Committee in the House of Commons. It will be of particular interest to those potentially affected by the Government’s proposals for high speed rail. This paper was prepared in relation to the promotion of the Bill for Phase One of the scheme which is now enacted. Although the contents were maintained and updated as considered appropriate during the passage of the Bill (including shortly prior to the enactment of the Bill in February 2017) the contents are now historic and are no longer maintained. If you have any queries about this paper or about how it might apply to you, please contact the HS2 Helpdesk in the first instance. The Helpdesk can be reached at: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham, B4 6GA by email: [email protected] or by phone: 08081 434 434 (lines are open 24 hours) Version 1.1 Last update 23rd February 2017 1 B10: HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL AS AMENDED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE 1. Introduction High Speed Two (HS2) is the Government’s proposal for a new, high speed north-south railway. The proposal is being taken forward in two phases: Phase One will connect London with Birmingham and the West Midlands; Phase Two will extend the route to Manchester, Leeds and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Case Slough Borough Council
    Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Slough Borough Council 8 November 2016 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Slough Borough Council’s information and use in relation to the Langley Station and Access Improvements Scheme Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 71 pages including the cover but not including appendices. Document history Job number: 5149496 Document ref: 5149496-DOC-001 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Structure DW Rev 1.1 Initial issue to WYG CT/JH TC LW DW 15/09/16 Rev 1.2 Second issue to WYG CT/JH TC LW DW 28/10/16 Rev 1.3 Final issue to WYG TC DW DW DW 08/11/16 Client signoff Client Slough Borough Council Project Langley Station and Access Improvements Document title Business Case Job no. 5149496 Copy no. Document 5149496-DOC-001 reference ii Atkins Business Case | Version 1.3 | 8 November 2016 | 5149496 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 1 The Langley Station and Access Improvements scheme 1 Background to the Business Case 1 Purpose of this document 2 Structure of the document 2 2. Scheme description 4 The proposed scheme 4 Complementary measures 6 3. The Strategic Case 8 Area description 8 Strategic external relationships 9 Business strategy 10 Problems identified 14 Drivers for change 14 The impact of not changing 16 Objectives 17 Measures for success 17 Scope 18 Constraints 18 Inter-dependencies 18 Stakeholders 19 Options 20 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Edge of Settlement
    Borough Local Plan Edge of Settlement Part 2 Constraints, Opportunities and Delivery Assessment July 2016 Edge of Settlement - Part 2 Constraints, Opportnities and Delivery Assessment 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 3 Purpose of the study 3 Edge of Settlement - Part 1 Green Belt Purpose Assessment 4 Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 4 2 Policy context 7 National Planning Policy Framework 7 National Planning Practice Guidance 7 National Planning Policy for Waste 8 Borough Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation (January 2014) 8 Summary: policy context 11 3 Methodology 12 Stage 4: Constraints, opportunities and delivery considerations 13 4 Conclusions 15 Stage 5: Presenting the assessment 15 Appendicies A Glossary 17 B Consultation statement 19 C Summary of constraint considerations 28 D Summary of opportunity considerations 33 E Assessment pro-forma 36 F Parcel assessments 40 A3 - Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot 40 A6 - Land including Ascot Railway Station car park, Station Hill, Ascot 46 A7 - Land south of Hermitage Parade, High Street, Ascot 52 A8 - Land west of St. George's Lane, including Shorts Recycling, Ascot 59 A20 - Sacred Heart Church, London Road, Sunningdale 65 C9 - Land between Southwood Road and Lower Mount Farm, Long Lane, Cookham Rise 70 C12 - Land east of Strande Park Caravan Park, Cookham Rise 75 D3 - Land north of Eton Road, adjacent to St. Augustine's Church, Datchet 80 D4 - Land between Slough Road and the M4, south east of allotments, Datchet 86 D5 - Land north and east of Churchmede Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Sites Available Hounslow, Langley, West Drayton, Ladbroke Grove
    MULTIPLE SITES AVAILABLE HOUNSLOW, LANGLEY, WEST DRAYTON, LADBROKE GROVE Patrick Rosso: Isa Naeem: Mobile: 07825 571048 Mobile: 07889 432972 Phone: 01895 457714 Phone: 01895 457726 01895 813344 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] colliers.com/uk/industrial Batching Plant, Cranford Lane South, Hounslow, TW6 2DN LOCATION LEASE TERMS Situated within the prominent Heathrow Cargo 28 day rolling licence Area, access to the A30 is available within 0.3 miles providing easy onward access to the M25, SERVICE CHARGE via either Junction 13 or 14, in turn the national motorway network and Central London. A service charge is levied for the upkeep and maintenance of the The A30 also allows for access to the A312 common areas. Further details are towards greater West London areas such as available upon request. Hayes and Southall, as well as access to the M4 via Junction 3. LEGAL COSTS Each party will be responsible for their Hatton Cross Underground Station is located own legal costs incurred in this within 0.5 miles and provides routes into Central transaction. London via the Piccadilly line. BUSINESS RATES DESCRIPTION £1.50 per sq ft AREAS The Open Storage yard benefits from on site amenities and 24 hour on site security, areas RENT Sq Ft Sq M are available as per the schedule displayed. £7.50 per sq ft Area 1 8,608 799.71 KEY FEATURES VAT Area 2 13,342 1239.51 • 24 hour on site security Applicable TOTAL 21,950 2039.22 • Power and Water facilities provided • Unrestricted Access available Misrepresentation Act Colliers International gives notice that these particulars are set out as a general outline only for the guidance of intending Purchasers or Lessees and do not constitute any part of an offer or contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Specification 2016
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2016 Wessex Wessex March 2016 Network Rail – Route Specifications: Wessex 02 Route C: Wessex SRS C.01 Waterloo – Woking 03 SRS C.02 Woking – Basingstoke 07 SRS C.03 Basingstoke – Southampton 11 SRS C.04 Southampton – Weymouth 15 SRS C.05 Lymington Branch 19 SRS C.06 Woking – Portsmouth 23 SRS C.07 Main Line Suburban Lines 27 SRS C.08 Redhill – Guildford 32 SRS C.09 Guildford – Wokingham 36 SRS C.10 Isle of Wight 40 SRS C.11 Cosham to St Denys/Eastleigh 44 SRS C.12 Inner Windsor Lines 48 SRS C.13 Outer Windsor Lines 53 SRS C.14 Basingstoke – Salisbury 58 SRS C.15 Salisbury – Exmouth Junction 62 SRS C.16 Redbridge/Eastleigh – Salisbury 66 SRS C.17 Brookwood – Alton 70 SRS C.99 Other Freight Lines 74 Interface with other routes SRS J.09 Reading - Basingstoke 78 SRS K.05 Castle Cary - Dorchester 82 Glossary 86 SRS C.01 Waterloo – March 2016 Network Rail – Route Specifications: Wessex 03 Woking Geographic map Route specification description of choices for addressing capacity and connectivity on this SRS. :(/ :/ / * These include strengthening of all remaining Main Line services to %2. /RQGRQ3DGGLQJWRQ )66 6WUDWHJLF5RXWH6HFWLRQ 1 +$ &% :,1 0 1 + The line between London Waterloo and Woking forms part of the & 0/ * %5 + /RQGRQ%ULGJH % + 7 * /RQGRQ:DWHUORR /%& full length; further extension of Main Suburban services to 12-car (or -$ ; 7' $7* /RQGRQ9LFWRULD * +/ 1. South West Main Line (SWML) and covers of a distance of ( / * 9DX[KDOO /RQGRQ 1. %6 / $ Crossrail 2 as an alternative); and increasing the number of services 'DWH -XQH 0DS3URGXFHG%\ $VVHW,QIRUPDWLRQ 0DSSLQJ7H67DP ) (0DLO $VVHW,QIRUPDWLRQ 0DSSLQJ7HDP#1HWZRUN5DLOFRXN * &./ 4XHHQVWRZQ5RDG %DWWHUVHD /HZLVKDP approximately 24.5 miles.
    [Show full text]