DOCSLIB.ORG

Business Case Slough Borough Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Business Case Slough Borough Council Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Slough Borough Council 8 November 2016 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Slough Borough Council’s information and use in relation to the Langley Station and Access Improvements Scheme Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 71 pages including the cover but not including appendices. Document history Job number: 5149496 Document ref: 5149496-DOC-001 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Structure DW Rev 1.1 Initial issue to WYG CT/JH TC LW DW 15/09/16 Rev 1.2 Second issue to WYG CT/JH TC LW DW 28/10/16 Rev 1.3 Final issue to WYG TC DW DW DW 08/11/16 Client signoff Client Slough Borough Council Project Langley Station and Access Improvements Document title Business Case Job no. 5149496 Copy no. Document 5149496-DOC-001 reference ii Atkins Business Case | Version 1.3 | 8 November 2016 | 5149496 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 1 The Langley Station and Access Improvements scheme 1 Background to the Business Case 1 Purpose of this document 2 Structure of the document 2 2. Scheme description 4 The proposed scheme 4 Complementary measures 6 3. The Strategic Case 8 Area description 8 Strategic external relationships 9 Business strategy 10 Problems identified 14 Drivers for change 14 The impact of not changing 16 Objectives 17 Measures for success 17 Scope 18 Constraints 18 Inter-dependencies 18 Stakeholders 19 Options 20 4. The Economic Case 21 Outline approach to assessing value for money 21 Options appraised 21 Assumptions 22 Appraisal summary table 23 Value for Money statement 23 Assessment of social impacts 37 Value for Money 43 5. The Financial Case 46 Introduction 46 Outline approach 46 Cost estimates 46 Budgets/ Funding cover 48 Accounting implications 48 6. The Commercial Case 49 Outline approach 49 Output based specification 49 Procurement strategy 50 Sourcing options 51 Human Resource issues 53 Payment/ Charging mechanisms and framework 53 Risk allocation and transfer 53 Contract length 55 Contract management 55 7. The Management Case 56 Outline approach 56 iii Atkins Business Case | Version 1.3 | 8 November 2016 | 5149496 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Evidence of similar projects 56 Programme / Project dependencies 57 Contract management 57 Governance, organisational structure & roles 58 Programme / Project plan 60 Assurance & approval plan 60 Communications & stakeholder management 60 Programme / Project reporting 61 Implementation of work streams 61 Key issues for implementation 62 Risk management strategy 62 Benefits realisation plan 63 Monitoring and evaluation 64 8. Summary and conclusion 69 Appendices 72 Appendix A. Scheme Drawings Appendix B. Landscape and Architecture Report Appendix C. Option Assessment Report Appendix D. Appraisal Specification Report Appendix E. Modelling Report Appendix F. Appraisal Summary Table Appendix G. PERS and VURT report Appendix H. Risk Register Appendix I. Programme Appendix J. Flooding and Groundwater Report Appendix K. Support Letters Tables Table 1-1 Key objectives of the scheme 1 Table 1-2 BTLB programme management 2 Table 3-1 TVP LEP Strategic Economic Plan priorities 12 Table 3-2 Objectives and desired outcomes 17 Table 3-3 Option concepts 20 Table 4-1 Passenger demand 25 Table 4-2 Peak and off-peak standard fares, by destination 26 Table 4-3 Demand uplift 28 Table 4-4 Security benefits as new fare revenue 28 Table 4-5 Benefit values of changes in rail facilities (pence/journey) 29 Table 4-6 Benefit values of changes in cycling facilities (pence/journey) 29 Table 4-7 Cycle facilities benefits sensitivity tests (values in £ PV) 30 Table 4-8 Facilities benefits output - annual benefits as a result of rail and cycling facilities improvements to the pedestrian environment (values in £ PV) 30 Table 4-9 HEAT cycling benefits sensitivity tests 30 Table 4-10 Optimism bias mitigation 33 Table 4-11 Transport Economic Efficiency (£000s) – Core Scenario 35 Table 4-12 Public Accounts (£000s) – Core Scenario and Alternative Scenario 36 Table 4-13 Analysis of Monetised Costs and Benefits (£000s) 40 Table 4-14 Optimism bias sensitivity tests 41 Table 4-14 Scheme benefits sensitivity tests 42 Table 4-15 Non-monetised impacts of the Core Scenario 44 Table 4-16 Non-monetised impacts of the Alternative Scenario 45 Table 5-1 Breakdown of costs for the highway scheme 46 Table 5-2 Quantified Cost Estimate (millions, outturn) 47 Table 5.3 Funding package (£m, outturn) 48 Table 6-1 Procurement options 52 Table 6-2 Key project risks 55 Table 8-1 Quantified Cost Estimate (millions, outturn) 70 iv Atkins Business Case | Version 1.3 | 8 November 2016 | 5149496 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Figures Figure 4-1 PERS link assessment 31 Figure 7-1 Langley Station and Access Improvements scheme project governance structure (Highways elements) 59 Figure 7-2 Intervention logic map for the Langley Station and Access Improvements scheme 65 v Atkins Business Case | Version 1.3 | 8 November 2016 | 5149496 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Executive summary Langley Station and Access Improvements Scheme Slough Borough Council, Network Rail, Rail for London (Crossrail) and Great Western Railway hold a joint interest in how the borough’s three national rail stations are accessed by those living or working in Slough. With the arrival of Crossrail services scheduled from 2019, with the associated enhanced travel opportunities and improved regional connectivity, the accessibility and quality of facilities at and around the borough’s three stations will become even more crucial. Langley Station will be a gateway for Crossrail within Slough, providing rail access and connectivity between the residential areas in the east of the Borough with both the wider Thames Valley Berkshire sub-region and London. The Langley Station and Access Improvement scheme is expected to support the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (TVBLEP) aims of investing in infrastructure that would help grow employment, enterprise and industrial opportunities in the sub-region and enhance cross-boundary connectivity. The Core Scheme aims to improve pedestrian and cyclist access to Langley Station, provide reconfigured parking arrangements and drop-off facility for the station, and improve the perception of safety and security at and around the station. This includes measures such as new provisions and improvements of pedestrian facilities, introduction of shared use areas for pedestrians and cyclists, improvement of cycling facilities both within and around the station, reconfiguration of station car park including a new drop-off (kiss-and-ride) area in the station forecourt, and improvement in the landscaping around the station as well as the public realm. The scheme will also include elements undertaken by Crossrail/Rail for London under their On-Station Improvement Programme Step Free Access scheme. Problems and objectives The Langley Station and Access Improvement scheme would provide an opportunity to improve pedestrian and cycling access to and around the station, thereby encouraging increased walking and cycling trips. Improving access and safety at and around Langley Station would improve the attractiveness of Langley Station, and therefore support the TVBLEP aims of investing in infrastructure that would unlock future opportunities to enhance cross-boundary partnerships. The Langley Station and Access Improvement scheme’s public realm enhancements are expected to widen the influence of the Heart of Slough regeneration within Slough town centre, as well as wider infrastructure improvement projects within the town. The improvements to the station facilities, including a lift, wider stairs, minor station refurbishment works, and modified platform furniture will enhance perceptions and safety at this station. The Langley Station and Access Improvements scheme would ensure users with reduced mobility will be able to use the new rail services serving Langley Station. These users are currently unable to access existing services to and from the station, with the current layout necessitating that they travel to Slough or Datchet stations at present. Generally improving connectivity from Langley Station would contribute to improving people’s ability to access employment and education opportunities. Public realm improvements will also support local affordable transport in order to reach these opportunities, especially for pedestrians and cyclists. vi Atkins Business Case | Version 1.3 | 8 November 2016 | 5149496 Langley Station and Access Improvements Business Case Objectives Desired outcomes (1) Improve Facilitate / encourage commuter travel to/from Langley station pedestrian Encourage mode shift for journeys to/from the station towards sustainable access to and active travel Langley Enhance the legibility and visibility of Langley station to residents and station commuters in the wider area Improve safety and journey times for pedestrians using the key Station Road / Waterside Drive junction Maximise benefits accruing from rail operator investment into improving the services and passenger facilities at Langley station Transform the area around the station to a less car-dominated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachments, Bridge Platforms? • Design Aspects: Include In/ 200M of the Station
    Option Selection Report Version 1 Project Name: Crossrail Step Free Access Langley Mainline Railway Station OP Reference: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Sponsor/Client: Crossrail Project Manager: Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Version: 01 Date: 19/12/2013 Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 OPTIONS REPORT & CONCEPT DESIGNS 2 2.1 Selected Option 4 2.1.1 Station Access 5 2.1.2 Platform Access 5 2.2 Discarded Options 5 2.2.1 Viable Options 5 2.2.2 Non Viable Options 6 2.3 Constructability Assessment 6 2.4 Access and Possession Strategy 7 2.5 Project Schedule 7 2.6 Whole Life Cost Assessment of Options 7 2.7 Estimates (excluding whole life costings) 8 2.8 QRA 8 2.9 Risk Register 8 2.10 Assumptions 8 2.11 Signed Design Compliance Certificate 8 2.12 Asset Condition Surveys / GI / Topographical 8 3 INTERFACES WITH OTHER PROJECTS 8 4 CDM INFORMATION 9 5 SAFETY VERIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 9 6 CONSENTS STRATEGY 10 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 10 8 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS STRATEGY 10 9 ENGINEERING OUTPUTS 10 10 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 11 FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF SELECTED OPTION BY CLIENT, FUNDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS 11 APPENDICES 12 Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Version: 01 Date: 19/12/2013 APPENDICES A. Information received B. Description of accessible route C. Listing of works required D. Photos E. Drawings F. Risk register G. Information required H. Hazard log I. Investigation reports / summaries J. Ref: 317520/MMRA/WO023/0003 Version: 01 Date: 19/12/2013 Issue Record Issue No Brief History Of Amendment Date of Issue 00 Draft Issue 06/12/2013 01 First Issue 19/12/2013 Distribution List Name Organisation Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 597 23 June 2015 No. 21 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 23 June 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 735 23 JUNE 2015 736 is my right hon. Friend taking to support such charities House of Commons and to ensure that offenders leave prison ready to face the world of work? Tuesday 23 June 2015 Michael Gove: I commend my hon. Friend for raising the work of those two voluntary sector organisations. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Without the work of voluntary and third sector organisations, we would not be able to provide the educational and rehabilitative services that enable people PRAYERS who are currently in our prisons to have a second chance. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Michael Fabricant: Not just voluntary services have a role to play, but private businesses such as Marks & Spencer, and indeed other well known department stores. Does my right hon. Friend agree that we should encourage Oral Answers to Questions private enterprise to help in the rehabilitation of offenders to get them back to work? Michael Gove: I absolutely agree—that is a very good JUSTICE point. May I single out for praise the John Lewis Partnership, which does such a fantastic job in helping people from a variety of backgrounds to be all they can The Secretary of State was asked— be? I stress that there are other organisations, such as Greggs the bakers and, of course, Timpson, the shoe Prisoner Rehabilitation Services and key repair firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Slough Local Plan (Adopted March 2004)
    Slough Local Plan (adopted March 2004) Saved Policies and Policies still in use at December 2010 Key Policies not in use are struck-through as follows Policy X - not saved at September 2007 Policy X - no longer implemented at 08/09 AMR – superseded by the Core Strategy DPD Policy X - no longer implemented at 09/10 AMR – superseded by the Site Allocations DPD Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION AND STRATEGY PAGE1 No. Chapter 2: HOUSING 9 Housing Objectives Introduction Overall Housing Allocation Policy H1 (Housing Allocation) 10 Components of the Housing Provision Housing Capacity of the Slough Urban Area Green Belt Sites Policy H2 (Housing Sites) 14 Policy H3 (Additional Housing Sites) 14 Phasing Policy H4 (Phasing) 15 Local Housing Needs Policy H5 (Social Housing) 17 Policy H6 (Other Forms of Affordable Housing) 18 Town Centre Policy H7 (Town Centre Housing) 19 Loss of Potential Housing Land and Existing Residential Accommodation Policy H8 (Loss of Housing) 19 Future Residential Provision Policy H9 (Comprehensive Planning) 20 Housing Densities Policy H10 (Minimum Density) 21 Conversions and Changes of Use from Commercial to Residential Policy H11 (Change of Use to Residential) 22 Residential Area of Exceptional Character Policy H12 (Residential Areas of Exceptional Character) 23 Backland/Infill Development Policy H13 (Backland/Infill Development) 24 Amenity Space Policy H14 (Amenity Space) 25 Extensions to Existing Residential Properties Policy H15 (Residential Extensions) 26 Development within the Residential Curtilage Policy H16 (Garages, Outbuildings,
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033
    Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Reg 18 Report November 2016 Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Regulation 18 Report LC-273 Document Control Box Client Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Report Title Sustainability Appraisal of the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 Status Final Filename LC-273_RBWM_SA_Report_9_301116RC.docx Date November 2016 Author RB & RC Checked FG Approved ND Front credit: Windsor Caste by Jean-Marc Astesana Sustainability Appraisal for the Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 November 2016 LC-273_RBWM_SA_Report_9_301116RC.docx About this report & Notes for reader Lepus Consulting Ltd (Lepus) has prepared this draft report for sites, conservation areas, flood risk areas and watercourses, and the use of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. There the range of uses taking place. The assessment was prepared are a number of limitations, which should be borne in mind when between October and November 2016 and is subject to and considering the results and conclusions of this report. No party limited by the information available during this time. should alter or change this report whatsoever without written permission from Lepus. This report has been produced to assess the sustainability effects © Lepus Consulting Ltd of the Emerging Local Plan. It is not intended to be a substitute for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Appropriate SEA and SA are tools for predicting potential significant effects. Assessment (AA). For further information on the differences The actual effects may be different from those identified. between the products please see: Prediction of effects is made using an evidence-based approach https://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/environmentalassessment_tc and incorporates a judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue.Pdf
    Barnett Ross THURSDAY 9TH MAY 2013 At The Radisson Blu Portman Hotel 22 Portman Square London W1H 7BG Commencing at 12.00 p.m. Light refreshments served at 11.30 a.m. AUCTION 9TH MAY 2013 Auctioneers J. Barnett FRICS J. L. G. Ross MRICS Tel: 020 8492 9449 Fax: 020 8492 7373 Notice to all Bidders 1. Please note the General Conditions of Sale which are included with this catalogue and the Special Conditions of Sale which are available on request. An Addendum will be made available on the Auction Day and the bidder should check whether the lot which he/she is interested in bidding for is included. 2. Prospective purchasers are assumed to have inspected the properties in which they are interested and to have made all usual pre-contract searches and enquiries. 3. The successful Bidder is Bound under Contract as soon as the Auctioneer’s gavel falls on his/her final bid. Immediately thereafter the successful Bidder will be handed a Form to fill out supplying details of his/her name and address together with (if different) the name and address of the purchaser and those of his/her solicitors. He/she must also supply a cheque for the deposit, which we will hold at our office. The bidder will be given our bank account details and must arrange to transfer the deposit monies to our client bank account the following day by way of a ‘same day CHAPS payment.’ Once these funds are received we will return the bidder’s cheque by post. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill As Amended in the House of Commons Select Committee
    HIGH SPEED TWO PHASE ONE INFORMATION PAPER B10: HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL AS AMENDED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE This paper outlines the amendments made to the High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill by the Select Committee in the House of Commons. It will be of particular interest to those potentially affected by the Government’s proposals for high speed rail. This paper was prepared in relation to the promotion of the Bill for Phase One of the scheme which is now enacted. Although the contents were maintained and updated as considered appropriate during the passage of the Bill (including shortly prior to the enactment of the Bill in February 2017) the contents are now historic and are no longer maintained. If you have any queries about this paper or about how it might apply to you, please contact the HS2 Helpdesk in the first instance. The Helpdesk can be reached at: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham, B4 6GA by email: [email protected] or by phone: 08081 434 434 (lines are open 24 hours) Version 1.1 Last update 23rd February 2017 1 B10: HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL AS AMENDED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE 1. Introduction High Speed Two (HS2) is the Government’s proposal for a new, high speed north-south railway. The proposal is being taken forward in two phases: Phase One will connect London with Birmingham and the West Midlands; Phase Two will extend the route to Manchester, Leeds and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Sites Available Hounslow, Langley, West Drayton, Ladbroke Grove
    MULTIPLE SITES AVAILABLE HOUNSLOW, LANGLEY, WEST DRAYTON, LADBROKE GROVE Patrick Rosso: Isa Naeem: Mobile: 07825 571048 Mobile: 07889 432972 Phone: 01895 457714 Phone: 01895 457726 01895 813344 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] colliers.com/uk/industrial Batching Plant, Cranford Lane South, Hounslow, TW6 2DN LOCATION LEASE TERMS Situated within the prominent Heathrow Cargo 28 day rolling licence Area, access to the A30 is available within 0.3 miles providing easy onward access to the M25, SERVICE CHARGE via either Junction 13 or 14, in turn the national motorway network and Central London. A service charge is levied for the upkeep and maintenance of the The A30 also allows for access to the A312 common areas. Further details are towards greater West London areas such as available upon request. Hayes and Southall, as well as access to the M4 via Junction 3. LEGAL COSTS Each party will be responsible for their Hatton Cross Underground Station is located own legal costs incurred in this within 0.5 miles and provides routes into Central transaction. London via the Piccadilly line. BUSINESS RATES DESCRIPTION £1.50 per sq ft AREAS The Open Storage yard benefits from on site amenities and 24 hour on site security, areas RENT Sq Ft Sq M are available as per the schedule displayed. £7.50 per sq ft Area 1 8,608 799.71 KEY FEATURES VAT Area 2 13,342 1239.51 • 24 hour on site security Applicable TOTAL 21,950 2039.22 • Power and Water facilities provided • Unrestricted Access available Misrepresentation Act Colliers International gives notice that these particulars are set out as a general outline only for the guidance of intending Purchasers or Lessees and do not constitute any part of an offer or contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Note
    Meeting note File reference TR040009 Status Final Author Ewa Sherman Date 20 February 2014 Meeting with Network Rail Venue Temple Quay House, Bristol Attendees Network Rail: Malcolm Parsons – Senior Programme Development Manager, Network Rail Colin Field –Town Planning Manager, Network Rail John Lewis – Divisional Director, Jacobs Huw Williams - Senior Consultant (Planning and Development), Jacobs Dan O’Kelly - Principal Environmental Scientist, Jacobs Planning Inspectorate: Jessica Powis – Infrastructure Planning Lead Katherine Chapman – Case Manager Ewa Sherman – Case Officer Sheila Twidle – Head of Environmental Services Jill Warren – Senior EIA Advisor Meeting Initial meeting between the Planning Inspectorate and Network objectives Rail (NR) to discuss the proposed Western Rail Access to Heathrow (WRAtH) Circulation All attendees Introductions Introductions were made by all attendees and roles explained. The Planning Inspectorate (the Inspectorate) explained its openness policy and advised that a note of the meeting would be published on the project page, together with any advice given in accordance with s51 of the Planning Act 2008 (PA2008). Applicant’s presentation Network Rail (NR) delivered a project presentation which provided an overview of the proposed scheme and timescales in relation to the pre-application period and submitting the application. Discussion between the developer and the Inspectorate was structured around the presentation slides and the various matters were raised in relation to the main issues. They were the following: Objectives Funding Benefits Opioneering and Preferred Option Construction and tunnelling Notional programme Consultation Scheme overview and objectives The project named Western Rail Access to Heathrow (WRAtH) proposes a new railway link between the Great Western Mainline (GWML) approximately 800m east of Langley Railway Station to Heathrow Airport Terminal 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Growth Funds
    Local Growth Funds Contents Newbury: King’s Road Link Road ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Newbury: London Road Industrial Estate ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Newbury: Sandleford Park .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Newbury : Railway Station ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Reading: Green Park Railway Station ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Reading: South Reading Mass Rapid Transit .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Reading: East Reading Mass Rapid Transit .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Wokingham: Thames Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts
    Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts Technical Report Mott MacDonald Ltd Cross London Rail Links Limited Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts Technical Report Volume 1 of 2 February 2005 Crossrail Reference 1E0322-C1E00-00013 P:\Croydon\MMH\WEM\PROJ\211152 Crossrail Conland Assessment\final reports\1E0322-C1E00-00013.doc Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts Technical Report Mott MacDonald Ltd Cross London Rail Links Limited Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts Technical Report - Volume 1 of 2 February 2005 Crossrail Reference 1E0322-C1E00-00013 Mott MacDonald Limited REVISION HISTORY Rev Date Prepared Review Approved Accepted Description Final 14/02/05 SA FS JB TH Final Report MD FS Cross London Rail Links Limited 1, Butler Place LONDON SW1H 0PT Tel: 020 7941 7600 Fax: 020 7941 7703 www.crossrail.co.uk i P:\Croydon\MMH\WEM\PROJ\211152 Crossrail Conland Assessment\final reports\1E0322-C1E00-00013.doc Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts Technical Report Mott MacDonald Ltd Cross London Rail Links Limited Assessment of Contaminated Land Impacts Document Number 1E0322-C1E00-00013 Technical Report Volume 1 of 2 February 2005 This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting there from.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Rivers District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Three Rivers District Council Local Development Framework Infrastructure Delivery Plan March 2012 Contents Page Introduction 2 Policy and Background 2 Methodology 3 Limitations of the Study 3 Local Strategic Partnership 3 Hertfordshire Infrastructure and Investment Strategy 4 Summary of Findings 4 Three Rivers in Context 4 Location 5 Population 5 General Transport 6 Assessment of Infrastructure Capacity 7 Health 7 GPs 7 Local Strategic Partnership Projects 9 Hospitals/Acute Provision 9 Dentists 10 Education and Schools 12 Primary Schools 13 Secondary Schools 16 Emergency Services 21 Police 21 Fire 23 Cultural Services 25 Libraries 25 Cemeteries 26 Waste 27 Composting Facility 27 Strategic Transport 28 Croxley Rail Link 28 M25 Widening 29 Local Transport 30 Traffic Management/Highway Improvements 30 Bus Network 32 Cycling Facilities 34 Green Infrastructure 35 Open Spaces, Parks & Gardens and Amenity Greenspace 35 Parks and Gardens 35 Natural and Semi-Natural Green Space 35 Amenity Green Space 36 Provision for Children and Young People 36 Water Infrastructure 36 Waste Water and Sewage 37 Water Supply 37 Energy Infrastructure 39 Electricity Transmission 39 Electricity Distribution 39 Gas Transmission 39 Gas Distribution 39 Infrastructure Delivery Schedule 41 Glossary and Abbreviations 48 Background Papers 52 1 Introduction This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) seeks to establish what additional infrastructure is required to support the planned increase in new homes and jobs, and the projected population growth within the District up to 2026. It includes a review of existing provision for social infrastructure, (such as health and education facilities), physical infrastructure, (such as transport and utilities) and green infrastructure, (such as parks and open spaces).
    [Show full text]