DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Essays

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Bureau of Reclamation: History Essays from the Centennial Symposium Volumes I and II Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior Denver, Colorado 2008 Table of Contents Commissioner’s Introduction ............................................................................xxvii Senior Historian’s Introduction .......................................................................... xxix Bibliography of Papers Published in other Locations ......................................xxxiii VOLUME 1 Section I: Technological and Engineering History of Reclamation Concrete Dam Evolution: The Bureau of Reclamation’s Contributions to 2002. Gregg N. Scott, Larry K. Nuss, and John LaBoon ................. 1 I. Introduction ...........................................................................................1 II. Masonry Dams and the Early Years ......................................................4 III. The Amazing Arch and Developments of the 1920s .......................... 10 IV. Prelude to Hoover Dam ...................................................................... 14 V. Hoover Dam—Quantum Leaps Forward ............................................19 V.A. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 2— Slab Analogy Experiments, Denver 1938 ........................................22 V.B. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 3—Model Tests of Boulder Dam, Denver 1939 ....................................................................................23 V.C. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 4—Stress Studies for Boulder Dam, Denver 1939 ....................................................................................23 V.D. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 6—Model Test of Arch and Cantilever Elements, Denver 1939 ....................................................................24 V.E. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part VII—Cement and Concrete Investigations: Bulletin 1—Thermal Properties of Concrete, Denver 1940 ....................................................................................24 V.F. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part VII—Cement and Concrete Investigations: Bulletin 4—Mass Concrete Investigations, Denver, 1940. ...................................................................................25 V.G. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part VII—Cement and Concrete Investigations: Bulletin 2—Investigations of Portland Cement, Denver, 1940 ....................................................................................26 VI. Hydraulics for High Concrete Dams ................................................ 26 iii VII. World War II Era - Large Gravity Dam ............................................30 VIII. The Post-War Boom—Developments Continue ...............................34 IX. The Failure of Malpasset Dam—Rock Mechanics and Foundation Design Develops ...........................................................37 X. The Double-Curvature Arch—A New Standard for Effi ciency .........................................................................................40 XI. Structural Analysis Developments ....................................................44 A. Development and Computerization of the Trial Load Method ....................................................................................44 B. Linear Structural Analysis ..........................................................49 C. Nonlinear Structural Analysis ....................................................51 C.1. Nonlinear structural analysis of Monticello Dam ................................................................51 C.2. Nonlinear Structural Analysis of Pueblo Dam ...................................................................... 54 XII. Roller-Compacted Concrete—Rapid Construction for Gravity Dams .............................................................................55 XIII. Transition to Dam Safety—Applying Technology to Reduce Risk .....................................................................................59 XIV. Conclusions ......................................................................................63 Bibliography of Sources Consulted (in the order used in the paper.) .......63 100 Years of Embankment Dam Design and Construction in the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Richard Lyman Wiltshire .................... 67 Introduction ...............................................................................................67 Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations............................ 68 Period I (1902-1918)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................68 Period II (1919-1933)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................70 Period III (1934-1944)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................70 Period IV (1945-1975)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................71 Period V (1976-2002)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................71 Modern Embankment Dam Design and Construction ..............................72 Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction .............................................................................................. 78 Period I (1902-1918)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ......................................79 Upstream Impervious Zone Supported by Downstream Rockfi ll Zone ...................................................................................84 Upstream Impervious Zone Supported by Downstream Gravel Zone .....................................................................................84 iv Modifi ed Homogeneous Section ...................................................... 85 Belle Fourche Dam ...........................................................................85 Period II (1919-1933)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................... 93 Period III (1934-1944)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................... 99 Period IV (1945-1975)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................. 103 Period V (1976-2002)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................. 116 Conclusion ..............................................................................................131 Endnotes ..................................................................................................131 Historical Development of Durable Concrete for the Bureau of Reclamation. Timothy P. Dolen ................................................................ 135 Introduction .............................................................................................135 What is Concrete? ...................................................................................135 Early Obstacles to Durable Concrete ......................................................136 Mechanisms of Deterioration in the Western United States ................... 137 Sulfate Attack ....................................................................................137 Alkali-aggregate Reactions ...............................................................138 Freezing and Thawing Deterioration ................................................139 Developing the State-of-the-Art of Concrete Technology ......................139 The Early Years–The Concrete Pioneers (1902-1918) ..................... 140 The Abrams Generation (1918-1928) ...............................................142 Boulder Dam / The “Hoover Generation” (1928-1945) ................... 143 The Post-War Generation: “The Constructors” (1945-1990) ........... 146 The Present Generation and Beyond (1990- ) ................................147 Conclusions .............................................................................................147 The Author’s Closure: The Challenge for the Twenty-fi rst Century—Identify, Protect, Preserve ................................................149 Endnotes ..................................................................................................150 History of Drainage in the Bureau of Reclamation: A History of Subsurface Drainage in the Bureau of Reclamation. Rodney G. TeKrony, Glenn D. Sanders, and Billy Cummins ........... 153 Abstract ...................................................................................................153 Introduction .............................................................................................154 Legislation ..................................................................................................157 Fact Finder’s Act (December 5, 1924), (ch. 4, 43 Stat. 672 .................157 Omnibus Adjustment Act (May 25, 1926) ........................................... 157 Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (August 4, 1939) (ch. 418, 53 Stat. 1187) ....................................................................................157 v Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1953 (July 9, 1952) (ch. 597, 66 Stat. 445) ........................................................................158
Recommended publications

  • South Fork of the Flathead River Originates in the South End of the Bob Marshall Wilderness and Flows Northward to Hungry Horse Reservoir

    The South Fork Acclaimed as one of Montana’s most pristine and remote rivers, the Wild and Scenic South Fork of the Flathead River originates in the south end of the Bob Marshall Wilderness and flows northward to Hungry Horse Reservoir. Boats and supplies are generally packed in on mules or horses over mountain passes to reach the headwa- ters and then packed again from the take-out just above Meadow Creek Gorge, to Meadow Creek Trailhead. There are several commercial outfitters who can provide packing services or full-service floats, but plan ahead as they have limited space available. The floating season is generally from mid-June through late August. The river is Class II-III with standing river waves and shallow rocky shoals. Log jams and other hazards exist, and may change and move seasonally. Always scout from shore prior to floating into any river feature without clear passage. Due to its remoteness, the South Fork requires advanced planning and preparation. Contact the Spotted Bear Ranger Station for updated informa- tion on river and trail conditions, regulations and list of permitted outfitters. Restrictions All sections of the South Fork • Solid human waste containment and the use of fire pans and blankets is recommended. • Store your attractants in a bear resistant manner, in an approved container or vehicle, or hang. Section Specific Restrictions - Confluence with Youngs Creek to Cedar Flats - • Wilderness Section • The party size is limited to 15 people per group and 35 head of stock per party. • Use of weed free stock feed is required. • No wheeled carts or wheelbarrows.
  • Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey

    Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey

    THEODORE ROOSEVELT RESERVOIR 1995 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY 1.FOkTF1Ep02. RESOiJ U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation ERRATA Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey Page 10, Table 1, item 9: This should read 2,100 feet rather than 2214. Page 12, Table 1, item 47,footnote 1: Modifications to Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised the dam elevation and lowered the spillway sill elevation. The original dam elevation was 2142 and the spiliway elevation (top of radial gates) was 2136. Page 13. Table 2, ,foolnole 7: Computed sediment expressed as a percentage of total computed sediment (182,185 acre-feet). REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE FormApproved J 0MB No. 0704-0188 Pubhc reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the cotlection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suit 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paper-work Reduction Report (0704-0188), Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 1996 Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTiTLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey PR 6. AUTHOR(S) Joe Lyons and Lori Lest 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bureau of Reclamation REPORT NUMBER Technical Service Center Denver CO 80225 9.
  • American Burying Beetle Nebraska Distribution

    American Burying Beetle Nebraska Distribution

    Building Merritt Dam The What the Beetle Does Excavation of the core trench on the west side of Merritt Dam during May 1963. Note the series of 1 wells and waterlines to 1) Using their antennae, they have an dewater the work. American amazing ability to detect a carcass, such as a ground squirrel, up to two miles away. Even if it died only a few hours before. These carcasses are Burying scarce and the perfect place to find a mate. A dragline is setting the form in place for the Beetle 2 morning glory section of the spillway inlet structure during June 1963. 2) If the carcass is the right size, the pair will move it up to a few feet to a spot where the ground is soft enough for burial. This creature has an amazing ability to keep our landscape clean. Although they are only 1½ to 2 inches long, these beetles work hard to find and bury dead and decaying animals (carrion). To the beetles, carrion is food and necessary for their complex reproductive process. To humans, their activities benefit the entire ecosystem by recycling nutrients. They are so efficient that they often complete their task before flies can use the carcass for A Jersey spreader lays down their own breeding, which helps keep pest fly populations in check. Researchers are also investigating soil cement facing on Merritt 3 Dam in November 1963. antimicrobial properties of their secretions for pharmaceutical use. 3) Using bulldozer like movements, they plow through the ground, moving Nebraska provides one of the last strongholds for this species declared endangered in 1983.
  • Campaign and Transition Collection: 1928

    Campaign and Transition Collection: 1928

    HERBERT HOOVER PAPERS CAMPAIGN LITERATURE SERIES, 1925-1928 16 linear feet (31 manuscript boxes and 7 card boxes) Herbert Hoover Presidential Library 151 Campaign Literature – General 152-156 Campaign Literature by Title 157-162 Press Releases Arranged Chronologically 163-164 Campaign Literature by Publisher 165-180 Press Releases Arranged by Subject 181-188 National Who’s Who Poll Box Contents 151 Campaign Literature – General California Elephant Campaign Feature Service Campaign Series 1928 (numerical index) Cartoons (2 folders, includes Satterfield) Clipsheets Editorial Digest Editorials Form Letters Highlights on Hoover Booklets Massachusetts Elephant Political Advertisements Political Features – NY State Republican Editorial Committee Posters Editorial Committee Progressive Magazine 1928 Republic Bulletin Republican Feature Service Republican National Committee Press Division pamphlets by Arch Kirchoffer Series. Previously Marked Women's Page Service Unpublished 152 Campaign Literature – Alphabetical by Title Abstract of Address by Robert L. Owen (oversize, brittle) Achievements and Public Services of Herbert Hoover Address of Acceptance by Charles Curtis Address of Acceptance by Herbert Hoover Address of John H. Bartlett (Herbert Hoover and the American Home), Oct 2, 1928 Address of Charles D., Dawes, Oct 22, 1928 Address by Simeon D. Fess, Dec 6, 1927 Address of Mr. Herbert Hoover – Boston, Massachusetts, Oct 15, 1928 Address of Mr. Herbert Hoover – Elizabethton, Tennessee. Oct 6, 1928 Address of Mr. Herbert Hoover – New York, New York, Oct 22, 1928 Address of Mr. Herbert Hoover – Newark, New Jersey, Sep 17, 1928 Address of Mr. Herbert Hoover – St. Louis, Missouri, Nov 2, 1928 Address of W. M. Jardine, Oct. 4, 1928 Address of John L. McNabb, June 14, 1928 Address of U.
  • San Diego River Park Master Plan

    San Diego River Park Master Plan

    San Diego River Park Master Plan City of San Diego, California DRAFT – May 2013 San Diego River Park Master Plan The City of San Diego Adopted by the: Council of the City of San Diego Draft: May 2013 Resolution Number: R- San Diego River Park Master Plan – Draft May 2013 | i San Diego River Park Master Plan Amendments Amendment Date Approved by Resolution Date Adopted by City Resolution Planning Commission Number Council Number San Diego River Park Master Plan Certified by the California Coastal Commission on San Diego River Park Master Plan – Draft May 2013 | ii Mayor Bob Filner City Council Planning Commission District 1, Councilmember Sherri Lightner Eric Naslund, Chairperson District 2, Councilmember Kevin Faulconer Tim Golba, Vice-Chairperson District 3, Council President Todd Gloria Robert Griswold District 4, Councilmember Vacant Stephen Haase District 5, Councilmember Mark Kersey Sue Peerson District 6, Councilmember Lorie Zapf Michael Smiley District 7, Councilmember Scott Sherman District 8, Councilmember David Alvarez District 9, Councilmember Marti Emerald City Attorney Jan Goldsmith San Diego River Park Master Plan – Draft May 2013 | iii Acknowledgements San Diego River Park Foundation Development Services Department and San Diego River Coalition Kelly Broughton, Director Rob Hutsel, Executive Director Nancy Bragado, Principal Planner Michael Beck, Chair of the Board of Directors Robin Shifflet, Park Designer/Project Manager M. Lea Rudee, Ph.D., Vice Chair Jeff Harkness, Park Designer Janie DeCelles, Secretary Myra Herrmann, Senior Planner Charles V. Berwanger, Treasurer Dan Monroe, Senior Planner Jo Ann Anderson Dan Normandin, Senior Planner Sam Duran Brian Schoenfisch, Senior Planner Joan Embery Alan Grant City of San Diego Park and Recreation Board Cary Lowe Wilbur Smith, Chairperson James Peugh Bruce Brown Phil Pryde Rick Bussell James Ryan Amy Denhart Tom Sudberry William Diehl Claudia Dunaway Vickie Granowitz Master Plan Design Consultants Bobby Hughes Civitas, Inc.
  • UCRC Annual Report for Water Year 2019

    UCRC Annual Report for Water Year 2019

    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2 UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 355 South 400 East • Salt Lake City, UT 84111 • 801-531-1150 • www.ucrcommission.com June 1, 2021 President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Biden: The Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission, as required by Article VIII(d)(13) of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948 (“Compact”), is enclosed. The report also has been transmitted to the Governors of each state signatory to the Compact, which include Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona. The budget of the Commission for Fiscal Year 2021 (July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021) is included in this report as Appendix B. Respectfully yours, Amy I. Haas Executive Director and Secretary Enclosure 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................. 8 COMMISSIONERS .................................................................................... 9 ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS ........................................................... 10 OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION ....................................................... 10 COMMISSION STAFF ............................................................................. 10 COMMITTEES ......................................................................................... 11 LEGAL COMMITTEE ................................................................................
  • Current Hydraulic Laboratory Research in the United States

    Current Hydraulic Laboratory Research in the United States

    Reference No. YI-6/lNHU U. S. DEPARTMENT OR COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OR STANDARDS Lyman J. Briggs Director V \> X .2 ' v National Bureau of Standards Hydraulic Laboratory Bulletin Series A CURRENT HYDRAULIC LABORATORY RESEARCH IN THE UNITED STATES. Bulletin IV-1 January 1, 193^ WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page Introduction. 1 Current projects in hydraulic laboratories. 2 Completed projects. 1. Abstracts.. ... 73 " 11 2. Publications. 79 References to publications.... 79 Translations.. 82 Foreign pamphlets received by the National Bureau of Standards.. 84 Hydraulic Research in India. 89 The Scientific Research Institute.for Hydrotechnics at Leningrad. 90 U.S.S.R. Commission for Exchange of Hydraulic Laboratory Research Results. 91 International Association for Research on Hydraulic Structures... 92 Hydraulic Research Committees. 9° Glossaries and Standard Symbols for Use in.Hydraulics. 99 Index to Pi’ojects. 100 DIRECTORY. Baldwin-Southwark Corporation, 2 Philadelphia, Pa. California, University of, 3» 02 College of Engineering and Tidal Model Laboratory, Berkeley, California. California., University of, College of Agriculture, Davis, California. 66 California Institute of Technology, 67 Pasadena, California. Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, pa. 39 Case School of Applied Science, 6 Department of Civil Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio. Cornell University, 11,79 School of Civil Engineering, Ithaca^ H. Y. Harvard University, 11 The Harvard Engineering School, Cambridge, Mass. Horton Hydraulic and Hydrologic Laboratory, 12 Voorheesville, Now York. Page Illinois, University of, 14 Urbaaa, Illinois. Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, 15, 79 The State University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. Louisiana State University and Agricultural raid Mechanical College, 23 Baton Rouge, La. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 25 Department of Civil and Sanitary Engineering, Camsridge A, Mass.
  • BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans

    BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans

    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business DECEMBER 2018 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or Washington, DC 20425 national origin, or in the administration of justice. (202) 376-8128 voice • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information TTY Relay: 711 in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, www.usccr.gov religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
  • The Central Arizona Project

    The Central Arizona Project

    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short 1982 Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10) 6-9-1982 The Central Arizona Project Jon Kyl Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy- development-and-growth-interbasin-transfers Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Animal Law Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Contracts Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Hydrology Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Kyl, Jon, "The Central Arizona Project" (1982). New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy-development-and-growth-interbasin- transfers/21 Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. Jon Kyl, The Central Arizona Project, in NEW SOURCES OF WATER FOR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH: INTERBASIN TRANSFERS (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 1982). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School.
  • The Salt River – by Elly – Summer 2016

    The Salt River – by Elly – Summer 2016

    The Salt River – by Elly – Summer 2016 After living in Arizona for many years, I only recently discovered the pleasure of kayaking and tubing. So far, I have been on the river below Saguaro Lake, on Saguaro Lake, and on Canyon Lake; the other two lakes created in the Salt River, Apache and Roosevelt Lakes, (hopefully) remain to be explored. The Rio Salado, or Salt River, was dammed between the early 1900s and 1930s to provide water and electricity to the Phoenix area, and later served recreational needs. The first dam to be constructed was Roosevelt so my description goes from the `younger’ to the `older’ lakes. Some of my information on the river comes from here. The Four Lakes of the Salt River, from left to right: Saguaro, Canyon, Apache, and Roosevelt The Salt River flows into the Gila River to the West of Phoenix and the Gila contributes to the Colorado, near Yuma, in the Southwest of Arizona. This river is supposed to end in the Gulf of California but rarely has enough water (see here). The ecological impact of dams has been huge. Edward Abbey and others are famous for having suggested Monkey Wrenches to sabotage the plans for the dams in the West. There is always talk of restoring the natural flow in the river; see here. Apart from the ecological impact on bird populations, salinization, and silting, the politics behind dams is ugly. The 1972 Damming the West details the lobbying of the Bureau of Reclamation to keep new projects going even though there was no (agricultural) need for them.
  • Restoration Plan for Bull Trout in the Clark Fork River Basin and Kootenai River Basin Montana

    Restoration Plan for Bull Trout in the Clark Fork River Basin and Kootenai River Basin Montana

    RESTORATION PLAN FOR BULL TROUT IN THE CLARK FORK RIVER BASIN AND KOOTENAI RIVER BASIN MONTANA Prepared by: MONTANA BULL TROUT RESTORATION TEAM FOR GOVERNOR MARC RACICOT c/o Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks 1420 East Sixth Avenue Helena, Montana 59601 JUNE 2000 RESTORATION PLAN FOR BULL TROUT IN THE CLARK FORK RIVER BASIN AND KOOTENAI RIVER BASIN, MONTANA This restoration plan for bull trout in Montana was developed collaboratively by, and is supported by, the Montana Bull Trout Restoration Team, appointed by Governor Marc Racicot. Restoration Team members represented the organizations listed below. All parties to this restoration plan recognize that they each have specific statutory responsibilities that cannot be abdicated, particularly with respect to the management and conservation of fish and wildlife, their habitat, and the management, development and allocation of land and water resources. Nothing in this plan is intended to abrogate any of the parties' respective responsibilities. Each party has final approval authority for any activities undertaken as a result of this agreement on the lands owned or administered by them. The Restoration Plan was developed by the Montana Bull Trout Restoration Team, represented by the following organizations and agencies (arranged in alphabetical order by agency/organization): American Fisheries Society Bonneville Power Administration Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation National
  • Preface Chapter 1

    Preface Chapter 1

    Notes Preface 1. Alfred Pearce Dennis, “Humanizing the Department of Commerce,” Saturday Evening Post, June 6, 1925, 8. 2. Herbert Hoover, Memoirs: The Cabinet and the Presidency, 1920–1930 (New York: Macmillan, 1952), 184. 3. Herbert Hoover, “The Larger Purposes of the Department of Commerce,” in “Republi- can National Committee, Brief Review of Activities and Policies of the Federal Executive Departments,” Bulletin No. 6, 1928, Herbert Hoover Papers, Campaign and Transition Period, Box 6, “Subject: Republican National Committee,” Hoover Presidential Library, West Branch, Iowa. 4. Herbert Hoover, “Responsibility of America for World Peace,” address before national con- vention of National League of Women Voters, Des Moines, Iowa, April 11, 1923, Bible no. 303, Hoover Presidential Library. 5. Bruce Bliven, “Hoover—And the Rest,” Independent, May 29, 1920, 275. Chapter 1 1. John W. Hallowell to Arthur (Hallowell?), November 21, 1918, Hoover Papers, Pre-Com- merce Period, Hoover Presidential Library, West Branch, Iowa, Box 6, “Hallowell, John W., 1917–1920”; Julius Barnes to Gertrude Barnes, November 27 and December 5, 1918, ibid., Box 2, “Barnes, Julius H., Nov. 27, 1918–Jan. 17, 1919”; Lewis Strauss, “Further Notes for Mr. Irwin,” ca. February 1928, Subject File, Lewis L. Strauss Papers, Hoover Presidential Library, West Branch, Iowa, Box 10, “Campaign of 1928: Campaign Literature, Speeches, etc., Press Releases, Speeches, etc., 1928 Feb.–Nov.”; Strauss, handwritten notes, December 1, 1918, ibid., Box 76, “Strauss, Lewis L., Diaries, 1917–19.” 2. The men who sailed with Hoover to Europe on the Olympic on November 18, 1918, were Julius Barnes, Frederick Chatfi eld, John Hallowell, Lewis Strauss, Robert Taft, and Alonzo Taylor.