DOCSLIB.ORG

United Republic of Tanzania President's Office Regional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Republic of Tanzania President's Office Regional UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT IRINGA DISTRICT COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN 2015/2016-2020/2021 District Executive Director, P. Box. 108, Iringa Tel: +255 26 2702828 Fax: +255 26 2702585 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.iringadc.go.tz FEBRUARY, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The local Government system in Tanzania was established under the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977 under section 145 and 146. The operationalization of the Local Government system is pursued through the District Councils Authorities. Iringa district council like any other Council in Tanzania operates with statutory powers and in line with legislation and regulations enacted by the parliament under the Local Government Act No. 7 of 1982. This Act states the basic functions of the District Council as provision of social and economic services to the people within its area of jurisdiction hence promote their social welfare and economic well-being. This Strategic Plan therefore provides a framework for improving performance of service delivery in the District Council through the established priorities for efficient and effective allocation of resources. The strategic plan is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the background information based on the general profile of the district. Second chapter provides the Analysis of internal and external environment of the district council, where the internal environmental scan gives the situational analysis report in 19 service areas and identifies issues of major concern obstructing the performance of the District council in service delivery. While the external environmental scans furnish the analysis of national Sectoral policies and international goals or conventions which the district council strives to achieve. Third chapter provides analysis on performance review on the implementation of the medium term strategic plan 2011/2012-2015/2016; it identifies key issues to be rolled in the succeeding strategic plan. Forth chapter describes the vision, mission, strategic objectives, key targets, strategies and performance indicators. The Vision of Iringa District Council is to have a community with improved living standards and sustainable development by 2025. The Mission of Iringa District Council is to provide improved socio-economic services to the community through effective and efficient use of available resources for sustainable development. Where the achievement of the District‟s Vision and Mission will be guided by six core values which form the enduring believes of the organization staff which includes: diligence and integrity, team spirit, customer focus with courtesy, accountability, continuous learning and disaster management preparedness. Chapter Five describes the implementation, monitoring, evaluation, review frameworks, Risk analysis and assumptions. The successful implementation of the strategic plan will be the responsibility and accountability of the District Executive Director (DED), who is the Chief Executive Officer of the Council. With respect to this strategic plan, DED will be an overseer for the strategic plan implementation process. DED shall be responsible and accountable for the implementation of the Iringa District Council‟s (2015/2016 – 2020/2021) Strategic Plan. The Directorwith the support of the Management team shall regularly report to the Full Council with regards to the Plan implementation and its overall performance. TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYM ................................................................................................ i Ministry of Education and Vocational training ............................................................................................. i Statement of the District Council Chairman ...................................................................................................iv Statement of the District Director ................................................................................................................... v CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................. 1 BACKROUND INFORMATIONAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS ................................................... 1 1.1 Background Information........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Location and boundaries ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Administrative Unit ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Climate and Soil ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.9 Strategic Planning Process ...................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................................ 7 ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Analysis of Internal Environment ............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Administration and Human Resource ................................................................................................... 7 Administration and Human Resource is facing the following problems:......................................................... 8 2.2.2 Land and Natural Resources ................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.3 Planning Monitoring and Statistics ...................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Primary Education .............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.5 Secondary Education.......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.6 Community Development ................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.7 Livestock and Fisheries Development ................................................................................................ 21 2.2.8 Water....................................................................................................................................... 25 2.2.9 Health ............................................................................................................................................ 26 2.2.10Cleaning and Environment ......................................................................................................... 29 2.2.11 Beekeeping ....................................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.12 Legal ................................................................................................................................................. 34 2.2.13 Agriculture, Irrigation and Cooperatives .................................................................................. 35 2.2.14 Works ............................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2.15 Finance and Trade............................................................................................................................ 38 2.2.16Internal Audit ..................................................................................................................................... 39 2.2.17 Procurement Management Unit ............................................................................................ 40 2.2.18 Information Communication Technology (ICT) ....................................................................... 42 2.2.19 Election Unit ............................................................................................................................... 42 2.3 Analysis of External Environment .......................................................................................................... 43 2.3.1 Open Government Partnership (OGP) ........................................................................................ 43 2.3. 2 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) ................................................................................. 43 2.3.3 The Tanzania National Development Vision (2025) ................................................................... 44 2.3.4 Tanzania Five Years Development Plan (2011/12 – 2015/16) .................................................... 45 2.3.5 Big Result Now (BRN) initiatives ................................................................................................ 46 2.3.6 Agricultural Sector Development Strategy and Kilimo Kwanza Initiative ............................... 47 2.3.7Small and Medium Enterprise Development Policy 2002
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact Evaluation of HIMA Iringa Region Tanzania
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Danida) Impact Evaluation of HIMA Iringa Region Tanzania Annex 7: Satellite Image Analysis Prepared jointly by: Orbicon A/S Ringstedvej 20 DK-4000 Roskilde Denmark Goss Gilroy Inc. Management Consultants Suite 900, 150 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1P1, Canada October 2007 1.0 Concepts of Using Satellite Images as a Monitoring Tool In the ToR defining activities for the Evaluation, it was anticipated that satellite images were to be used in the HIMA implementation period and that the images should be used for “before and after” assessment of physical HIMA interventions. However, satellite images were not used in any documents despite several reports stating that such analysis could be valuable for monitoring purposes. Although considered several times by various project management teams as well as the RDE staff, the HIMA project never purchased any satellite images. In 2000, air photos were taken of divisions in both Makete and Njombe districts. The photos from Makete were missing and a series of photos in a scale of 1:50,000 covering Imalinyi and Lupembe divisions in Njombe division were available. Unidentified air photos from 1985 and 1986 (incomplete series) from the former IRADEP (Iringa agricultural development project, EEC) in a scale of 1:25,000 were also found. The incomplete regional IRADEP photos from 1985 and the HIMA photos from 2000 are missing the “flight run maps”, are lacking in even basic initial ground interpretation, as well as field verification and do not include photos over several years within the impact measurement period. Ultimately, the photos are of no value to the Evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Farmers' Characteristics and Perception Towards Climate
    Journal of Environment and Earth Science www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3216 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0948 (Online) Vol.5, No.8, 2015 Women Farmers’ Characteristics and Perception towards Climate Change and Variability in Iringa District, Tanzania Frank Phillipo 1, Magreth Bushesha 2 and Zebedayo S.K. Mvena 3 1. Department of Community Development, University of Iringa, P.O Box 200 Iringa, Tanzania 2. Directorate of Quality Assurance and Control, The Open University of Tanzania, P.O Box 23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 3. Department of Agricultural Education and Extension, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.0 Box 3024, Morogoro, Tanzania *E-mail of corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Perception is widely recognized to be a precondition for adaptation to climate change and variability. This study was conducted in the semi-arid part of Iringa District in Tanzania to establish association between women farmers’ characteristics and perception towards climate change and variability. A cross-sectional research design and multistage random sampling technique was used in selecting 385 women farmers. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software and content analysis respectively. Findings show that majority of women farmers in study area have perceived high perception on climate change and variability as indicated by increase in number of seasons without enough rainfall, poor distribution of rainfall during rain season, rainfall peak season ending earlier than normal and increases of temperature in the study area. The study also observed significant difference (P< 0.05) in perception between women farmers with less numbers of years in farming and those with more.
    [Show full text]
  • Iringa Region Socio-Economic Profile, 2013
    The United Republic of Tanzania IRINGA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2013 October, 2013 The United Republic of Tanzania IRINGA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2013 Jointly prepared Ministry of Finance, National Bureau of Statistics and Iringa Regional Secretariat National Bureau of Statistics Dar es Salaam October, 2013 Iringa Region Socio-Economic Profile, 2013 Foreword The goals of Tanzania‟s Development Vision 2025 are in line with United Nation‟s Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are pursued through the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) or MKUKUTA II. The major goals are to achieve a high-quality livelihood for the people, attain good governance through the rule of law and develop a strong and competitive economy. To monitor the progress in achieving these goals, there is need for timely, accurate data and information at all levels. Problems especially in rural areas are many and demanding. Social and economic Tservices require sustainable improvement. The high primary school enrolment rates recently attained have to be maintained and so is the policy of making sure that all pupils who pass standard seven examinations join Form One. The food situation is still precarious; infant and maternal mortality rates continue are high and unemployment triggers mass migration of youths from rural areas to the already overcrowded urban centres. Added to the above problems, is the menace posed by HIV/AIDS, the prevalence of which hinders efforts to advance into the 21st century of science and technology. The pandemic has been quite severe among the economically active population leaving in its wake an increasing number of orphans, broken families and much suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Baseline Studies in Selected Wildlife Management Areas Under the Financial Crisis Initiative/Cash-For-Work Program
    Socio-Economic Baseline Studies in Selected Wildlife Management Areas under the Financial Crisis Initiative/Cash-for-Work Program MBOMIPA WMA Report A zebra grazing in MBOMIPA WMA HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS Associates in Professional Public Health and Development Consulting 2ND FLOOR NAKIETE HOUSE, ALI HASSAN MWINYI ROAD P.O. BOX 33335 ,TEL: +255 22 27728 16 , FAX:+255 22 27728 14 DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA Final Report, October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF PLATES ...................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Iringa Region
    FOCUS: IRINGA REGION The view of the countryside from a hilltop outside Mufindi, Iringa region. Introduction Agriculture: The Distinction Between Cash and Food Crops As the closest out of the fertile and Blurs picturesque southern highlands regions to Dar es Salaam, Iringa region acts as a Though farmers in Iringa are making more gateway to the lucrative market. It is an money from their harvests in recent years, intensely agricultural region, with the vast this has not been coming only from the majority of the population employed in small- cultivation of traditional cash crops. Though scale farming. This combination of location tea and tobacco cultivation are healthy, the and fertility make its largest urban area, largest increases are among foods that can Iringa Town, a natural location for a growing fetch a good price from national or regional cluster of agro-processors such as makers of consumers as food crops. Similar to the way dairy products, sauce and canned fruit, that Irish Potatoes went from being unheard vegetable oil, and dried paprika, among of to commonplace in very little time, there others. have been large increases in the cultivation of spices such as paprika and unusual crops Iringa demonstrates both the advantages such as mushrooms, as well as large and perils of the liberalized economy, with increases in familiar vegetables such as many taking advantages of market tomatoes, cabbage, onions, and sunflower opportunities to make a better living, but seeds, which are used for oil. Other others trapped on the outside looking in, agriculture or forestry-related industries unable to get good prices for their produce which are active in Iringa are the timber and because of road and storage problems and a paper industries and beekeeping.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Extent of Human Pressures and Impact on Natural Forests of Uttl
    ANALYSIS OF THE EXTENT OF HUMAN PRESSURES AND IMPACT ON NATURAL FORESTS OF UTTL Unilever Tea Tanzania Limited (UTT) ANALYSIS OF THE EXTENT OF HUMAN PRESSURES AND IMPACT ON NATURAL FORESTS OF UNILEVER TEA TANZANIA LIMITED FINAL REPORT #"$"4 B u re a u fo r A g ric u ltu ra l C o n s u lta n c y a n d A d v is o ry S e rv ic e S o k o in e U n iv e rs ity o f A g ric u ltu re E-m a il b a c a s @ s u a n e t.a c .tz D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 7 BACAS i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Unilever Tea Tanzania Limited located in Mufindi district, Iringa region has a long- term lease of 20,000 hectares out of which relatively undisturbed natural forests, wetlands and grasslands cover 65%, which are part of the Udzungwa biodiversity ‘hot spot’, one of 24 in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and Tanzania. The UTT forests are interlinked with other natural forests in Mufindi including Kigogo forest.Communities bordering the estate’s boundaries are exerting pressure on the forests because of demand for its products mainly for fuel wood, building materials and medicinal plants. This is likely to affect the biodiversity found in the natural forests. The aim of this study was to establish the extent of local community dependence on the natural forests and propose mitigating measures for protection of important animal and plant species in the forest ‘hot spot’ through the local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Analysis of Irrigation Schemes in Iringa Rural District, Tanzania Master Thesis
    Ronja Hüppe A Puzzle with Missing Pieces: Institutional Analysis of Irrigation Schemes in Iringa Rural District, Tanzania Master Thesis The Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, is the international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). Eight departments, associated research institutions and the Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine in Oslo. Established in 1986, Noragric’s contribution to international development lies in the interface between research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments. The Noragric Master Thesis is the final thesis submitted by students in order to fulfil the requirements under the Noragric Master programme “International Environmental Studies”, “International Development Studies” and “International Relations”. The findings in this thesis do not necessarily reflect the views of Noragric. Extracts from this publication may only be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation contact Noragric. © Ronja Hüppe, December 2014 [email protected] [email protected] Noragric Department of International Environment and Development Studies P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway Tel.: +47 64 96 52 00 Fax: +47 64 96 52 01 Internet: http://www.nmbu.no/noragric II Declaration I, Ronja Hüppe, declare that this thesis is a result of my research investigations and findings. Sources of information other than my own have been acknowledged and a reference list has been appended. This work has not been previously submitted to any other university for award of any type of academic degree. Signature..................................... Date........................................... III IV Acknowledgements Writing this thesis has been an eye-opening journey through Norway and Tanzania, which I truly enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Iringa - Kilolo Workshop Report
    IRINGA - KILOLO WORKSHOP REPORT Building Future Governance, Land Use, and Carbon Management Scenarios at the Landscape Scale in the Kilolo District Global Comparative Study on REDD+ Multilevel Governance and Carbon Management at the Landscape Scale Martin Kijazi April 2015 Iringa - Kilolo Workshop Report Building Future Governance, Land Use, and Carbon Management Scenarios at the Landscape Scale in the Kilolo District Global Comparative Study on REDD+ Multilevel Governance and Carbon Management at the Landscape Scale Martin Kijazi April 2015 Report © 2015 Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved. Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Kijazi M. 2015. Building Future Governance, Land Use, and Carbon Management Scenarios at the Landscape Scale in the Kilolo District. Report. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org 1 Table of Contents 2 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................ 3 3 Introduction and Objectives.................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Overall objective of the workshop ................................................................................... 4 3.2 Specific Objectives of the workshop...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by Iringa Municipal Council FOREWORD Historically, Iringa
    Iringa Master Plan 2015 – 2035 (Main Report) FOREWORD Historically, Iringa was established as an administrative centre for the southern highland regions of Settlements Development, the Iringa Region Administrative Secretariat, the Technical Team, Public Tanganyika during the German Colonial rule. While its resource base has remained almost the same, and Private Institutions and individuals. I remain hopeful and optimistic that this Mater Plan will be the economic base has transformed significantly from agro-based processing to education and fruitfully used to spearhead the social, economic and 1environmental development of Iringa tourism. From the 1960s, Iringa used to be an industrial centre for maize processing vegetable and Municipality. fruit canning, diamond cutting, tobacco processing, cotton ginning and production of soft drinks. Most of these industries collapsed in the 1980s following the world economic recession that was precipitated by the rise in fossil fuel prices and structural adjustment programmes. It was until the 1990s when higher learning institutions started to locate in Iringa that the economy of the town re- emerged. The resurgence of the economy has been accompanied with the booming population resulting into a number of challenges. These include; the rapid growth of unplanned settlements, William V. Lukuvi (MP) depletion of forest resources along mountain slopes, limited number of surveyed and serviced land Minister for Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development and deteriorating buildings and infrastructure both in the central business district and peri-urban Tanzania areas. Date 30th June, 2017 The preparation and completion of this master plan is a timely endeavor that will not only address these challenges but also provide a framework for charting out courses of action and formulating programmes and projects to realize the vision of the municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruaha Ecosystem and Selous Ecosystem in Central Eastern, Tanzania
    Feasibility Study on Elephant Movement between the Greater Ruaha Ecosystem and Selous Ecosystem in Central Eastern, Tanzania By Cuthbert Leonard Nahonyo Department of Zoology and Wildlife Conservation University of Dar es Salaam P. O. Box 35064 Dar es salaam, Tanzania Email: [email protected], [email protected] May 2009 ABSTRACT The study to conduct a preliminary investigation of the elephant migration between Greater Ruaha and Selous ecosystems was conducted in 2008/2009. The study was intended to establish if there are elephant movements between Ruaha and Mikumi NPs. Specifically the study attempted to establish and track the existing and possibly dead elephant migration routes from Ruaha to Mikumi, and identifying important locations along the route and threats facing the corridor and elephants in the survey area. The survey used a number of techniques including literature survey, interviews and direct field observations. Researchers tracked on foot from Ruaha to Mikumi the elephant routes, taking GPS coordinates at important locations, taking photographs, interviewing people and assessing habitat and elephant dung along the migration routes. Vehicles, motorcycles and bicycles were used to assist researchers reach certain locations for investigation. The study was spread in three regions of Iringa, Dodoma and Morogoro and encompassing four districts of Iringa rural, Mpwapwa, Kilolo and Kilosa. Villages covered during the study from Ruaha National Park towards Mikumi National Park include Kinyika, Kisanga, Mboliboli, Makuka, Izazi, Migori, Makatapora (Kinyari subvillage), Migori in Iringa Rural District, Mkulula, Nyanzwa, Igunda, Mgowero, Mtandika and Ruaha Mbuyuni in Kilolo District. Others are Malolo, Kisanga, Msolwa, Madizini, Kidai, and Ihombwe in Kilosa District.
    [Show full text]
  • Implication of Climate Change and Variability on Stream Flow in Iringa
    Uncorrected Proof 1 © 2016 The Authors Journal of Water and Climate Change | in press | 2016 Implication of climate change and variability on stream flow in Iringa region, Tanzania Lucy Kassian, Moses Tenywa, Emma T. Liwenga, Kate Wellard Dyer and Yazidhi Bamutaze ABSTRACT This paper investigates the implication of climate change and variability on the river flow within the Lucy Kassian (corresponding author) Mkwawa University College of Education, a traditional irrigation farming system, vinyungu, in Iringa region, Tanzania. The study aimed at Constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam, establishing areas that are most impacted by climate change in terms of river flow and various P.O. Box 2513, Iringa, adaptation strategies. It is based on both primary data collected by questionnaires distributed Tanzania randomly among 189 farmers and key informant checklists conducted with villages’ leaders and E-mail: [email protected] Agriculture Extension Officers. Two focused group discussions were carried out for each village as Moses Tenywa Yazidhi Bamutaze well as the researcher’s own observations, and secondary data includes: literature review, rainfall College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and river flow data. The long-term annual trends of rainfall and river flow were analyzed via Mann– Makerere University, ’ fi P.O. Box 7062, Kendall s statistical test and linear trend analysis. Climate data on rainfall trend showed a signi cant Kampala, decreasing pattern during the last 17 years. Also, river flow data showed a slight decline within the Uganda same period. Decrement in river flow, combined with rainfall fluctuation, forced farmers to employ Emma T. Liwenga Institute of Resource Assessment, various adaptation strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Participation in Water Resource Projects Management in Iringa District Council, Tanzania
    www.ticd.ac.tz Tengeru Community Development Journal ISSN 1821-9853(Print) ISSN 2665-0584(online) Vol. 5, No.2, 2018 Community Participation in Water Resource Projects Management in Iringa District Council, Tanzania. Chumbula, J. J.1 and Massawe, F. A.2 1Department of Economics and Social Studies, Ardhi University, P.O Box 35176, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Email: [email protected]. 2Department of Policy, Planning and Management, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3035, Morogoro, Tanzania. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Community participation in water project management has received international attention to replace top down approaches to development. However, the approach receives critiques regarding the extent to which participation in water project design and implementation is meaningful and really engages communities in the process. This calls for continuous local level research to identify practices that can increase the likelihood of meaningful community participation. A cross sectional research was conducted in Iringa District, Tanzania to assess the practice of community participation on selected community water projects. The study specifically ought to assess participation of stakeholders in different stages of water projects development and to determine the role of community members in maintenance of project infrastructure. Data collection was carried out through household‟s survey, semi-structured interviews with key informants and focus groups discussions. Descriptive analysis was employed to answer key research questions. The study findings show that despite water being one of the essential needs in the respective communities, the initial idea came from donors. Generally, the community participation was low in almost all project phases.
    [Show full text]