DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis L.B.M. Neven

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis L.B.M. Neven REPRESENTATIONS OF THE OLD AND AGEING IN THE DESIGN OF THE NEW AND EMERGING Assessing the design of Ambient Intelligence technologies for older people Graduation Committee Chair: prof. dr. R.A. Wessel Secretary: prof. dr. R.A. Wessel University of Twente Promotor: prof. dr. N.E.J. Oudshoorn University of Twente Referees dr. ir. A. Peine Utrecht University dr. K.E. Konrad University of Twente Members: prof. dr. S. Wyatt University of Maastricht prof. dr. ir. P.P.C.C. Verbeek University of Twente prof. dr. S. Kuhlmann University of Twente dr. E.H.M. Moors Utrecht University The research that led to this thesis was funded entirely by the University of Twente This dissertation was printed with financial support from the Netherlands Graduate School of Science, Technology and Modern Culture (WTMC) and from the department Science, Technology and Policy Studies (STePS) at the University of Twente Cover photography by Marieke van Kammen Language editing by Clare Shelley-Egan Printed by Ipskamp Drukkers BV, Enschede © Louis Neven 2011 ISBN: 978-90-365-3224-2 2 REPRESENTATIONS OF THE OLD AND AGEING IN THE DESIGN OF THE NEW AND EMERGING ASSESSING THE DESIGN OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES FOR OLDER PEOPLE PROEFSCHRIFT Ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Twente, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H. Brinksma, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 1 september 2011 om 14:45 uur door Louis Barbara Maria Neven geboren op 4 november 1978 te Meerssen 3 Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. Nelly Oudshoorn © Louis Neven 2011 ISBN: 978-90-365-3224-2 4 The endless cycle of idea and action, Endless invention, endless experiment, Brings knowledge of motion, but not of stillness; Knowledge of speech, but not of silence. T.S. Eliot – Choruses from ‘The Rock’ 5 6 Acknowledgements This is a book about representations. It is only fitting to start such a book with a small comment on a common representation in academia: that of ‘doing a PhD’ as a solitary affair. For a PhD student their thesis is indeed their major project and chief responsibility and in the latter parts of the process it does generally – and certainly did in this case – involve months of semi-voluntary solitary confinement while the ‘writing up’ is going on. However, one need only look at the acknowledgements of PhD theses to see that doing a PhD is also a distinctly social affair.1 And, indeed, I too owe much to many intelligent, considerate and friendly people. I would first like to go back to the years which preceded my time as a PhD student, as the people who helped me then have also had a major influence on my PhD thesis. Without them I would have never been able to start this thesis in the first place. A special thank you to Thijs Hoex and Geert Somsen for supporting me as a bachelor student during a period that my mind was willing, but my body wasn’t always playing ball. Thanks to Bernike Pasveer for caring about the “technological culture” master students and for forwarding me the job ad that led to this thesis. Thanks to Michiel van Well who took a young intern under his wing and taught me many skills, tricks and lessons valuable to a young researcher. Thanks to Wiebe Bijker for suggesting that I should consider doing a PhD, which made me realize that I could consider doing a PhD. Above all I would like to thank Nelly Oudshoorn. Nelly is the kind of supervisor who never forgets an appointment, who always keeps her promises and who always has sharp and constructive comments. Apart from being a true professional, I also got to know Nelly as an empathic and warm person with an eye for both the development and wellbeing of a young researcher. I simply could not have asked for a better supervisor. I would also like to thank Barend van der Meulen for his role as co-supervisor in the first part of my PhD track. Unfortunately Barend could not stay involved in my project till the end, but for the time that he was involved, Barend proved a sharp observer and a great lateral thinker, who often encouraged me to come up with better and clearer arguments for the choices I wanted to make. For giving me the opportunity to engage in various teaching activities – and for teaching me how to teach – I would like to thank Barend van der Meulen, Ellen van Oost, Nelly Oudshoorn and in particular Willem Halffman (if only for Willems heroic act of teaching first year policy students about equality and fair distribution by illegally sneaking three herrings into a lecture theatre). 1 Indeed the social study of acknowledgments could be an interesting STS project. 7 I would further like to thank all colleagues STeHPS\STePS, and in particular Evelien Rietberg, Hilde Meijer and Marjatta Kemppainen for being friendly, kind and very helpful with all matters, however big or small. Thanks to the organizers of and the attendants to the STePS colloquia, research days, methodology seminars and user cluster meetings at which I have presented my work and have received many helpful questions and encouraging comments. Thanks to Stefan Kuhlmann for being very open to the idea of having a PhD student on the STePS daily board. Thanks to all the members of the STePS daily board and the WTMC education committee for providing a nice and cooperative atmosphere and for taking the plight of PhD students seriously. Thanks to Sally Wyatt, Els Rommes, Willem Halffman and Marjatta Kemppainen for organizing very informative and enjoyable WTMC workshops and summer schools in Ravenstein. I would also like to thank Kelly Joyce and Meika Loe for bearing with an inexperienced young writer, for inviting me to speak at the plenary session during a conference at the British Library, but most important of all, for unwittingly making an invaluable contribution to the overall focus and theoretical background of this thesis. I would further like to thank Alexander Peine, for working together on presentations and publications, for the inspiring discussions over coffee at the library café in Utrecht, and for sharing my enthusiasm for the subject of ageing and technology. Then there were my forays to, in Julian’s words, ‘a potty little place’ in the North-West of England. I would like to thank Arie Rip for sending me on my Lancaster tangent. All my visits to Lancaster, however short or long, have been memorable for all the right reasons. This would not have been possible without Maggie Mort, Celia Roberts, Lucy Suchman, Elizabeth Shove and all the other researchers and (visiting) PhD students at the Lancaster University Sociology department. I would particularly like to thank Maggie Mort, Celia Roberts, Christine Milligan, Elham Kashefi, Josie Baxter and all the other people involved in the EFORTT project for taking me to Barcelona, but, odd as it may seem, even more so for taking me to Morecambe and Preston (see e.g. chapter 7). Thanks to my Lancastrian friends for making my time as a visiting PhD student to the Lancaster University Sociology department very enjoyable. In particular I would like to thank Linda and Julian for their friendship and hospitality. And a special thank you to Lenneke Kuijer; Lancastrian office mate, friend, and organizer of a workshop at the Delft University of Technology which allowed me to try out my ‘seven suggestions’ on four engineers ‘in the wild.’ I would further like to thank all the PhD students and post-docs who have worked at or visited the STeHPS/STePS department over the years for all the serious and less serious discussions at the coffee machine, over lunch or over a beer in the pub. 8 Thanks to Clare Shelley-Egan for being a great office mate, for suffering through all our questions about the English language and for doing the language editing for this thesis. A very big thank you to Haico te Kulve and Frank van der Most for being, in Franks words, my “roomies” from the start, but more so, for sharing the trials and tribulations of PhD life and for having become dear friends. I would like to thank my sister and my ‘non-academic’ friends for sticking with me through more and less difficult times, for providing me with great opportunities to take my mind off of work and for generally being a great bunch of people that I enjoy spending my time with. I would like to thank my parents for their support, particularly towards the end when it mattered most. Finally, I would like to thank Marieke for not complaining too much – or too little (‘tu lavori sempre’) – about my working habits, for being there during the ups and the downs, and for being the kind of girl who occasionally still does a handstand. Being a PhD student has been a rewarding experience. I got to travel far and wide, got to speak at major conferences, got to publish in nice journals and books, got the opportunity to live abroad for a while, met many interesting people and I got to make some new friends. Nevertheless, everyone who has written a PhD thesis knows that this is no picnic, and at times it can be, and indeed was, rather tough. It is at these times that many people have come through for me. I am very grateful for that. De lètste wöärd hiej zeen in ’t plat. Dit proofschrif weurt opgedraage ter noagedagtenis aan Maria Johanna Antoinette ‘Tant Net’ Neven, die altied ’n ljèrares hauw wille weure en dat nwats gewóre is, mèh mich toch de allerbelangriekste dinger geljèrd hèt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Products As Agents: Metaphors for Designing the Products of the Iot
    Products as Agents: Metaphors for Designing the Products of the IoT Age Nazli Cila1, Iskander Smit2, Elisa Giaccardi3, Ben Kröse1 1 Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Digital Life Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, [email protected], [email protected] 2 Info.nl, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, [email protected] 3 Delft University of Technology, Department of Industrial Design, Delft, The Netherlands, [email protected] ABSTRACT empower people and enrich their everyday life. In order to Design-based inquiries into the networked products of the gain insights on how to create networked products that Internet of Things (IoT) lack a coherent understanding of attain these aims, as design researchers, we are required to the effect of such products on society. This paper proposes better understand not only the technical infrastructure and a new taxonomy for networked products, which would technological parameters of networked products (as IoT is allow articulation on their current state and future, and generally tackled in engineering and computer sciences), provide insights to designers for creating meaningful and but also the social relationships of these products with aesthetic products of IoT. Central to this framework is the everyday practices of people [37]. proposition that our current product-scape should be understood as a distribution of material agencies and best For the past couple of decades, there has been a shift in the analyzed through the metaphor of “agency”. We identify definition of designers’ main task from designing “things”, three types of agencies, i.e., the Collector, the Actor, and which are objects, to designing Things, namely socio- the Creator, and discuss how this approach could create material assemblies [6,7].
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Human Centric Challenges in Ambient Intelligence Environments to Meet Societal Needs
    Solving Human Centric Challenges in Ambient Intelligence Environments to Meet Societal Needs A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy (Computer Science) by Erin Griffiths December 2019 © 2019 Erin Griffiths Approval Sheet This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Computer Science) Erin Griffiths This dissertation has been read and approved by the Examining Committee: Kamin Whitehouse, Adviser Jack Stankovic, Committee Chair Mary Lou Soffa A.J. Brush John Lach Accepted for the School of Engineering and Applied Science: Dean, School of Engineering and Applied Science December 2019 i To everyone who has helped me along the way. ii Abstract In the world today there exists a large number of problems that are of great societal concern, but suffer from a problem called the tragedy of the commons where there isn`t enough individual incentive for people to change their behavior to benefit the whole. One of the biggest examples of this is in energy consumption where research has shown that we can reduce 20-50% of the energy used in buildings if people would consistently modify their behavior. However, consistent behavior modification to meet societal goals that are often low priority on a personal level is often prohibitively difficult in the long term. Even systems design to assist in meeting these needs may be unused or disabled if they require too much effort, infringe on privacy, or are frustratingly inaccurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambient Intelligence
    Ambient intelligence Ambient intelligence is closely related to the long term vision of an intelligent service system in which technolo- gies are able to automate a platform embedding the re- quired devices for powering context aware, personalized, adaptive and anticipatory services. Where in other me- dia environment the interface is clearly distinct, in an ubiquitous environment 'content' differs. Artur Lugmayr defined such a smart environment by describing it as ambient media. It is constituted of the communication of information in ubiquitous and pervasive environments. The concept of ambient media relates to ambient media form, ambient media content, and ambient media tech- nology. Its principles have been established by Artur Lug- mayr and are manifestation, morphing, intelligence, and experience.[1][2] An (expected) evolution of computing from 1960–2010. A typical context of ambient intelligence environment is In computing, ambient intelligence (AmI) refers to a Home environment (Bieliková & Krajcovic 2001). electronic environments that are sensitive and respon- sive to the presence of people. Ambient intelligence is a vision on the future of consumer electronics, 1 Overview telecommunications and computing that was originally developed in the late 1990s for the time frame 2010– 2020. In an ambient intelligence world, devices work in More and more people make decisions based on the effect concert to support people in carrying out their everyday their actions will have on their own inner, mental world. life activities, tasks and rituals in an easy, natural way us- This experience-driven way of acting is a change from ing information and intelligence that is hidden in the net- the past when people were primarily concerned about the work connecting these devices (see Internet of Things).
    [Show full text]
  • A. Define and Explain the Internet of Things
    IoT Solutions 1. Attempt any three of the following: a. Define and explain the Internet of Things. Ans: The Internet of things is defined as a paradigm in which objects equipped with sensors, actuators, and processors communicate with each other to serve a meaningful purpose. Equation of Internet of Things: Physical Object + Controllers, Sensors and Actuators + Internet = Internet of Things Physical Object: Devices, vehicles, buildings and other items which are embedded with electronics, software, sensors, and network connectivity, which enables these objects to collect and exchange data. Controllers: A controller, in a computing context, is a hardware device or a software program that manages or directs the flow of data between two entities In a general sense, a controller can be thought of as something or someone that interfaces between two systems and manages communications between them. Sensors: Sensor is a device, module, or subsystem whose purpose is to detect events or changes in its environment and send the information to other electronics, frequently a computer processor. A sensor is always used with other electronics. Actuators: An actuator is a component of a machine that is responsible for moving and controlling a mechanism or system. Internet: The internet is a globally connected network system that uses TCP/IP to transmit data via various types of media. The internet is a network of global exchanges – including private, public, business, academic and government networks – connected by guided, wireless and fiber-optic technologies. Example of Internet of Things: In your kitchen, a blinking light reminds you it’s time to take your tablets.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Concept: the Internet of Things and the Explosion of Interconnectivity
    CORE CONCEPTS The Internet of Things and the explosion of interconnectivity CORE CONCEPTS Stephen Ornes, Science Writer It was 1982, and a group of computer science graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, was thirsty for more than knowledge: some wanted a Coca Cola. But the researchers were frustrated. The Coke machine was on the third floor of the university’s Wean Hall, and oftentimes they’d venture up to the dis- penser only to find it empty, or worse, full of warm soda. So the scientists connected the machine to the university’s computer network. By checking online, thirsty researchers could ensure the machine was stocked with cold bottles before visiting. This turned out to be more than an achieve- ment in efficient caffeine delivery; it’s thought to be one of the first noncomputer objects to go online (1). The notion of pervasive computing entails a vision of the world in which computing isn’t limited to tab- lets, smartphones, and laptops. The realization of this vision, called the “Internet of Things” (IoT), is the ever- expanding collection of connected devices that cap- ture and share data. Any object, outfitted with the right Pervasive computing and its realization, known as the “Internet of Things,” entails sensors, can observe and interact with its environment. an ever-expanding collection of connected devices that capture and share data. A homeowner can adjust the thermostat, close the Image courtesy of Shutterstock/a-image. blinds, or raise a garage door with a voice command to a smartphone app. A connected refrigerator can send a list of its inventory to a shopper.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitous Computing Research at PARC in the Late 1980S
    The origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s by M. Weiser R. Gold † J. S. Brown ‡ Ubiquitous computing began in the Electronics At the same time, the anthropologists of the Work and Imaging Laboratory of the Xerox Palo Alto Practices and Technology area within PARC, led by Research Center. This essay tells the inside story of its evolution from “computer walls” to “calm Lucy Suchman, were observing the way people re- computing.” ally used technology, not just the way they claimed to use technology. To some of the technologists at PARC, myself included, their observations led toward thinking less about particular features of a comput- er—such as random access memory and number of pixels or megahertz—and much more about the de- n late 1987, Bob Sprague, Richard Bruce, and tailed situational use of the technology. In partic- other members of the Xerox Palo Alto Research I ular, how were computers embedded within the com- Center (PARC) Electronics and Imaging Laboratory plex social framework of daily activity, and how did (EIL) proposed fabricating large, wall-sized, flat- they interplay with the rest of our densely woven panel computer displays from large-area amorphous physical environment (also known as “the real silicon sheets. It was thought at the time that this world”)? technology might also permit these displays to func- tion as input devices for electronic pens and also for From these converging forces (“from atoms to cul- the scanning of images (by placing documents di- ture,” as we like to say of PARC) emerged the Ubiq- rectly against the displays).
    [Show full text]
  • Reconceptualizing Spatial Privacy for the Internet of Everything E. Anne
    Reconceptualizing Spatial Privacy for the Internet of Everything E. Anne Uteck Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree in Law Faculty of Law Common Law Section University of Ottawa © E. Anne Uteck, Ottawa, Canada, 2013 DEDICATION For Carole Lucock We began together, we shared it together, we finish together. This is our accomplishment my friend. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With the biggest and deepest love rushes and profound thanks to my children Spencer and Kate who bravely left their lives in Halifax to come with me to Ottawa on this crazy quest of mine to get a PhD. Being at the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, and most especially the opportunity to be involved with the inter-disciplinary research project, ‘On the Identity Trail: Understanding the Importance and Impact of Anonymity and Authentication in a Networked Society’ has been an invaluable experience. Part of this experience was the opportunity to meet and work with two wonderful individuals and talented scholars, Jane Bailey and Val Steeves. They have enriched my life in Ottawa and provided an exemplary research standard to which we should all strive to attain. And they are, quite simply, just plain fun to be around. My heartfelt thanks to Teresa Scassa for her constant support and encouragement over the years in Halifax and in Ottawa – and regularly bringing perspective back into the life of a doctoral candidate. I could not have made it this far or accomplished what I have without Teresa Scassa. I have benefitted from her mentorship and value our friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Ubiquitous Computing and Networking Management
    APNOMS 2003 DEP, Fukuoka, Japan Challenges in Ubiquitous Computing and Networking Management Jong T. Park ([email protected]) Kyungpook National University Korea Ubiquitous Computing & Networking Environment Electronic Cyber Space Smart Real Space Internet Internet Home Network Server (G)MPLS Server Fusion IPv6 Hot Spots 3G/4G Convergence UWB Tiny Invisible Objects Notebook Smart Interface Sensors Web/XML Actuators Bluetooth Multimedia Wearable Handheld Device Computing KNU AIN Lab. APNOMS’2003 2 Features of Cyber Space and Smart Real Space Electronic Cyber Space Smart Real Space Any (time, where, format) Any (device, object)+ Client/Server Computing, P2P Proactive & Embedded (G)MPLS, Broadband Access Computing Network Sensors, MEMS, Wearable B3G/4G, NGN, Post PC, IPv4/v6, Computing, IPv6(+), Near Field XML Communication (UWB, ..) Converging Networks Ad-hoc networks, Home networking Communication/Banking, Comm./(Music/TV Broadcasting), Telematics/Telemetry, e-commerce/government, … u-commerce/government /university/library KNU AIN Lab. APNOMS’2003 3 Current Issues in Ubiquitous Computing and Networking Current Technical Issues Low Power Intelligent Tiny Chip and Sensors Ubiquitous Interface Near-field Communication (UWB, ..), IPv6 Protection of Privacy and Security Management Intelligent Personalization Non-Technical Issues Laws and Regulation Sociological Impact KNU AIN Lab. APNOMS’2003 4 Research Projects America MIT’s Auto-ID and Oxigen, Berkeley’s Smart Dust, NIST’s Smart Space MS’s EasyLiving, HP’s CoolTown Europe
    [Show full text]
  • The Coming Age of Calm Technology
    Bits flowing through the wires of a computer network are invisible; a “network monitor” Page 1 of 8 Bits flowing through the wires of a computer network are invisible; a “network monitor...” Page 2 of 8 for the road. Any computer with which you have a special relationship, or that fully engages or THE COMING AGE OF occupies you when you use it, is a personal computer. Most handheld computers, such as the Zaurus, the Newton, or the Pilot, are today still used as personal computers. A $500 network computer is still CALM TECHNOLOGY[1] a personal computer. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown TRANSITION - THE INTERNET AND DISTRIBUTED Xerox PARC October 5, 1996 COMPUTING A lot has been written about the Internet and where it is leading. We will say only a little. The INTRODUCTION Internet is deeply influencing the business and practice of technology. Millions of new people and their information have become interconnected. Late at night, around 6am while falling asleep after twenty hours at the keyboard, the sensitive technologist can sometimes hear those 35 million web pages, 300 thousand hosts, and 90 million users shouting "pay attention to me!" The important waves of technological change are those that fundamentally alter the place of technology in our lives. What matters is not technology itself, but its relationship to us. Interestingly, the Internet brings together elements of the mainframe era and the PC era. It is client- server computing on a massive scale, with web clients the PCs and web servers the mainframes In the past fifty years of computation there have been two great trends in this relationship: the (without the MIS department in charge).
    [Show full text]
  • Taking the Internet to the Next Physical Level
    THE IOT CONNECTION Taking the Internet to the Next Physical Level Vint Cerf and Max Senges, Google Research Our physical universe has been transformed by computing’s ubiquity. The authors describe the challenges and delights we’ll find in a future enabled by the Internet of Things. e’ve come a long way since the article in which Mark Weiser FROM THE EDITOR envisioned small, With the realization of the ideas behind the Internet of Things (IoT)— a network ubiquitous,W connected computers of everyday items with embedded computers that can connect directly or indi- that enhanced all aspects of our rectly to the Internet—we’re entering the era of ubiquitous computing. As the IoT lives.1 Here, we present our analy- takes root, the number of devices connecting to the Internet is likely to increase sis of the architectural leitmotifs 10- or even 100-fold over the next 10 years, forever changing our relationship with that should be pursued so the In- “things”—now they’ll be smart: smart devices, smart homes, smart buildings, and ternet of Things (IoT) ecosystem smart cities. can enjoy the staggering success of Although its origins date back to 1999, the IoT’s core ideas were first described the Internet, which resulted in the in Mark Weiser’s vision of ubiquitous computing in 1988. Although these ideas have been around for more than 25 years, it has only recently become practical for World Wide Web. By success, we high-performance processing and networking to be built into everyday products. mean the economic value and the We now have the ability to augment our things’ capabilities at a reasonable cost social and technological innova- and size: this embedded computing—with the equivalent performance of a com- tion these platforms have brought plete 1980s-era workstation—can be added to products for less than $10.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Sustainable Ubiquitous Computing and Interaction
    Toward Sustainable Ubiquitous Computing and Interaction Tengxiang Zhang Assistant Research Scientist Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Contents • Background and Motivation • What is ubiquitous computing • Why sustainability is important • Thing-computer Interconnection • Redistribute resources between thing and computer • Research Areas • Thing: Self-sustainable backscatter sensors • Computer: Finger wearables • Interconnection: Power and information transfer techniques Mark Weiser’s Vision of Ubiquitous Computing Tab Inch-size ~2.5cm Pad Foot-size ~30cm Board Yard-size ~1m [Weiser, 1991] “you may see more than 100 tabs, 10 or 20 pads and one or two boards. This leads to … hundreds of computers per room.” 3 Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265, 3. Ubiquitous Computing in the IoT era Tab : Smartphone, smartwatch Pad : Tablets and laptops Board: TVs 4 Internet of Things World of Batteries A Paradigm for Sustainable Ubiquitous Computing Computer Thing Resource-abundant Resource-constrained Interconnection Power Information Necessary Functions for Computers and Things Computer Thing (sensor) Sensing Feedback Storage Sensing Feedback Storage Computation Communication Computation Communication Augmented Things Computer Thing Resource-abundant Resource-constrained Interconnection Power Information Research Taxonomy 1. Self-sustainable Backscatter Sensor Thing 2. Finger Wearables Computer 3. Power and Information Transfer Techniques Interconnection Research Taxonomy 1. Self-sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • From the Internet of Computers to the Internet of Things
    From the Internet of Computers to the Internet of Things Friedemann Mattern and Christian Floerkemeier Distributed Systems Group, Institute for Pervasive Computing, ETH Zurich {mattern,floerkem}@inf.ethz.ch Abstract. This paper1 discusses the vision, the challenges, possible usage sce- narios and technological building blocks of the “Internet of Things”. In particu- lar, we consider RFID and other important technological developments such as IP stacks and web servers for smart everyday objects. The paper concludes with a discussion of social and governance issues that are likely to arise as the vision of the Internet of Things becomes a reality. Keywords: Internet of Things, RFID, smart objects, wireless sensor networks. In a few decades time, computers will be inter- woven into almost every industrial product. Karl Steinbuch, German computer science pioneer, 1966 1 The vision The Internet of Things represents a vision in which the Internet extends into the real world embracing everyday objects. Physical items are no longer disconnected from the virtual world, but can be controlled remotely and can act as physical access points to Internet services. An Internet of Things makes computing truly ubiquitous – a concept initially put forward by Mark Weiser in the early 1990s [29]. This develop- ment is opening up huge opportunities for both the economy and individuals. However, it also involves risks and undoubtedly represents an immense technical and social challenge. The Internet of Things vision is grounded in the belief that the steady advances in microelectronics, communications and information technology we have witnessed in recent years will continue into the foreseeable future. In fact – due to their diminish- ing size, constantly falling price and declining energy consumption – processors, communications modules and other electronic components are being increasingly integrated into everyday objects today.
    [Show full text]