DOCSLIB.ORG

2020.10 Dashboard HRP Final 3E Trimestre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020.10 Dashboard HRP Final 3E Trimestre Dashboard de suivi réponse HRP 2020 juillet-septembre 2020 OS 1: Fournir une réponse d’urgence aux CHIFFRES CLES Cadre Harmonisé - Mars 2020 personnes en situation d’insécurité alimentaire Situation projetée Assistance alimentaire* 78% Nombre de personnes PERSONNES CIBLEES ayant reçu une assistance alimentaire 3,4 millions Cible: 2 354 669 OS 2: Préserver les moyens d'existence des 51% Femme 49% Homme personnes en situation d'insécurité alimentaire Appui aux moyens d’existence STATUT FINANCIER (USD) Gap Nombre de personnes ayant reçu un appui pour 78% 22% Financé 9% 196 leurs moyens d’existence Cible: 3 370 355 millions * L’assistance alimentaire comprend la réponse soudure, l’assistance requis alimentaire d’urgence Covid19 et l’assistance aux IDPs dans le Lac. Au 23 octobre 2020 Nombre129 des partenaires Nombre51 des projets Nombre29* des partenaires Légende du cluster mis en oeuvre par les ayant rapporté leurs Limites partenaires du cluster activités au cluster Province * Tous les partenaires ne mettent pas en oeuvre des projets , faute de financements. Département Cadre Harmonisé, situation Les activités liées au HRP ont touché 1 845 780 personnes en assistance projetée juin-août 2020 alimentaire, dans toutes les provinces du pays ainsi que N’Djamena et les IDPs Minimale au Lac, soit un taux de réalisation de 78%. Au Lac, les 80% de réalisation s’expli- Sous pression quent par le fait que le nombre des IDPs ne cesse d’augmenter dépassant ainsi la cible initiale de planification lors de la révision du HRP de mai. Crise L’appui aux moyens d’existence a touché 312 331 pour la plupart en appui Taux de couverture par province xx% à la campagne agropastorale (semences pluviales, outils, formations), pour un taux de réalisation de 9% par rapport à la cible. Le tracé des frontières ou limites et les appellations employées dans la présente Date de production : 6 octobre 2020 h�p://fscluster.org/chad [email protected] publication n’impliquent aucune prise de position de la. part des Nations Unies. Sources de données : partenaires du Cluster SA [email protected] Dashboard de suivi réponse HRP 2020 juillet-septembre 2020 Assistance alimentaire Appui aux moyens d’existence Tibesti Ouest Tibesti Tibesti Tibesti Ouest Est Tibesti Tibesti Est 64% Fada Fada Am-Djarass Am-Djarass Ennedi Ouest Ennedi 100% Ouest Ennedi Ennedi Borkou Est Borkou Est Yala Yala Borkou Borkou Borkou 100% Borkou Mourtcha 92% Mourtcha Nord Wadi Hawar Nord Wadi Hawar Kanem Kanem Kobé Kanem Barh-El-Gazel Kobé Mégri Kanem Barh-El-Gazel Nord Biltine Mégri Wadi Fira Nord Biltine Barh-El-Gazel 12% 3% Wadi Fira Batha Barh-El-Gazel 100% Batha 100% Ouest Fouli Dar-Tama Ouest Batha Fouli Dar-Tama Kanem 4% Ouara Kanem Assoungha Batha Ouara 100% Batha Assoungha Kaya Wadi Barh-El- Ouaddaï 35% 3% Batha Barh-El Kaya Wadi Barh-El- Ouaddaï Lac Bissam Gazel Est Barh-El -Gazel Lac Bissam Gazel Est 6% 80% Mamdi Sud 57% -Gazel Wayi Ouest 66% Mamdi Sud Wayi Ouest Dagana Abdi 23% Fitri Dagana Fitri Abdi Hadjer-Lamis Mangalmé Hadjer-Lamis Haraze-Al-Biar Djourf Al Mangalmé Djourf Al Ahmar Haraze-Al-Biar Guéra Kimiti Guéra Ahmar N'Djaména Dababa Sila 24% Dababa Kimiti 14% Abtouyour N'Djaména Abtouyour Sila Chari Baguirmi Chari Baguirmi Aboudéia Chari-Baguirmi Bahr-Azoum 2% Aboudéia Guéra Chari-Baguirmi Guéra Bahr-Azoum 100% Barh-Signaka 17% 42%Mayo- 100% 62% Mayo- Barh-Signaka Salamat Kebbi Kebbi Est Salamat Est Bahr-Köh Bahr-Köh Haraze-Mangueigne Haraze-Mangueigne Tandjilé Lac Iro 7% Lac Iro Mayo- 100% Mayo- Tandjilé Moyen-Chari Moyen-Chari Kebbi Kebbi 13% 82% Ouest Ouest Logone Logone Occidental Mandoul 82% Occidental Grande Mandoul Grande Logone 79%Barh- Sido Logone Barh- Sido 48% Oriental Sara Oriental Monts Mo5%nts Sara La Nya de Lam de Lam La Nya Pendé Pendé 100% 11 19 38 2 acteurs21 avec 19 partenaires Projets mis en oeuvre Acteurs font l’appui Projets mis en oeuvre apportent l’assistance alimentaire par les partenaires aux moyens d’existence par les partenaires Le tracé des frontières ou limites et les appellations employées dans la présente Date de production : 6 octobre 2020 h�p://fscluster.org/chad [email protected] publication n’impliquent aucune prise de position de la. part des Nations Unies. Sources de données : partenaires du Cluster SA [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary of Protected Areas in Chad
    CHAD Community Based Integrated Ecosystem Management Project Under PROADEL GEF Project Brief Africa Regional Office Public Disclosure Authorized AFTS4 Date: September 24, 2002 Team Leader: Noel Rene Chabeuf Sector Manager: Joseph Baah-Dwomoh Country Director: Ali Khadr Project ID: P066998 Lending Instrument: Adaptable Program Loan (APL) Sector(s): Other social services (60%), Sub- national government administration (20%), Central government administration (20%) Theme(s): Decentralization (P), Rural services Public Disclosure Authorized and infrastructure (P), Other human development (P), Participation and civic engagement (S), Poverty strategy, analysis and monitoring (S) Global Supplemental ID: P078138 Team Leader: Noel Rene Chabeuf Sector Manager/Director: Joseph Baah-Dwomoh Lending Instrument: Adaptable Program Loan (APL) Focal Area: M - Multi-focal area Supplement Fully Blended? No Sector(s): General agriculture, fishing and forestry sector (100%) Theme(s): Biodiversity (P) , Water resource Public Disclosure Authorized management (S), Other environment and natural resources management (S) Program Financing Data Estimated APL Indicative Financing Plan Implementation Period Borrower (Bank FY) IDA Others GEF Total Commitment Closing US$ m % US$ m US$ m Date Date APL 1 23.00 50.0 17.00 6.00 46.00 11/12/2003 10/31/2008 Government of Chad Loan/ Credit APL 2 20.00 40.0 30.00 0 50.00 07/15/2007 06/30/2012 Government of Chad Loan/ Credit Public Disclosure Authorized APL 3 20.00 33.3 40.00 0 60.00 03/15/2011 12/31/2015 Government of Chad Loan/ Credit Total 63.00 93.00 156.00 1 [ ] Loan [X] Credit [X] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other: APL2 and APL3 IDA amounts are indicative.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Submitted for Presentation at UNU-WIDER’S Conference, Held in Maputo on 5-6 July 2017
    DRAFT WIDER Development Conference Public economics for development 5-6 July 2017 | Maputo, Mozambique This is a draft version of a conference paper submitted for presentation at UNU-WIDER’s conference, held in Maputo on 5-6 July 2017. This is not a formal publication of UNU-WIDER and may refl ect work-in-progress. THIS DRAFT IS NOT TO BE CITED, QUOTED OR ATTRIBUTED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM AUTHOR(S). The impact of oil exploitation on wellbeing in Chad Abstract This study assesses the impact of oil revenues on wellbeing in Chad. Data used come from the two last Chad Household Consumption and Informal Sector Surveys ECOSIT 2 & 3 conducted in 2003 and 2011 by the National Institute of Statistics and Demographic Studies. A synthetic index of multidimensional wellbeing (MDW) is first estimated using a multiple components analysis based on a large set of welfare indicators. The Difference-in-Difference approach is then employed to assess the impact of oil revenues on the average MDW at departmental level. Results show that departments receiving intense oil transfers increased their MDW about 35% more than those disadvantaged by the oil revenues redistribution policy. Also, the farther a department is from the capital city N’Djamena, the lower its average MDW. Economic inclusion may be better promoted in Chad if oil revenues fit local development needs and are effectively directed to the poorest departments. Keys words: Poverty, Multidimensional wellbeing, Oil exploitation, Chad, Redistribution policy. JEL Codes: I32, D63, O13, O15 Authors Gadom
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 2017-06
    worki! ownng pap er 2017-06 Universite Laval The impact of oil exploitation on wellbeing in Chad Gadom Djal Gadom Armand Mboutchouang Kountchou Gbetoton Nadège Adèle Djossou Gilles Quentin Kane Abdelkrim Araar February 2017 i The impact of oil exploitation on wellbeing in Chad Abstract This study assesses the impact of oil revenues on wellbeing in Chad using data from the two last Chad Household Consumption and Informal Sector Surveys (ECOSIT 2 & 3), conducted in 2003 and 2011, respectively, by the National Institute of Statistics for Economics and Demographic Studies (INSEED) and, from the College for Control and monitoring of Oil Revenues (CCSRP). To achieve the research objective, we first estimate a synthetic index of multidimensional wellbeing (MDW) based on a large set of welfare indicators. Then, the Difference-in-Difference (DID) approach is used to assess the impact of oil revenues on the average MDW at departmental level. We find evidence that departments receiving intense oil transfers increased their MDW about 35% more than those disadvantaged by the oil revenues redistribution policy. Moreover, the further a department is from the capital city N’Djamena, the lower its average MDW. We conclude that to better promote economic inclusion in Chad, the government should implement a specific policy to better direct the oil revenue investment in the poorest departments. Keys words: Poverty, Multidimensional wellbeing, Oil exploitation, Chad, Redistribution policy. JEL Codes: I32, D63, O13, O15 Authors Gadom Djal Gadom Mboutchouang
    [Show full text]
  • CAR CMP Population Moveme
    CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC SITUATION Election-related displacements in CAR Cluster Protec�on République Centrafricaine As of 30 April 2021 Chari Dababa Guéra KEY FIGURES Refugee camp Number of CAR IDPs Mukjar As Salam - SD Logone-et-Chari Abtouyour Aboudéia !? Entry point Baguirmi newly displaced Kimi� Mayo-Sava Tulus Gereida Interna�onal boundaries Number of CAR returns Rehaid Albirdi Mayo-Lemié Abu Jabrah 11,148 15,728 Administra�ve boundaries level 2 Barh-Signaka Bahr-Azoum Diamaré SUDAN Total number of IDPs Total number of Um Dafoug due to electoral crisis IDPs returned during Mayo-Danay during April April Mayo-Kani CHAD Mayo-Boneye Birao Bahr-Köh Mayo-Binder Mont Illi Moyo Al Radoum Lac Léré Kabbia Tandjile Est Lac Iro Tandjile Ouest Total number of IDPs ! Aweil North 175,529 displaced due to crisis Mayo-Dallah Mandoul Oriental Ouanda-Djalle Aweil West La Pendé Lac Wey Dodjé La Nya Raja Belom Ndele Mayo-Rey Barh-Sara Aweil Centre NEWLY DISPLACED PERSONS BY ZONE Gondje ?! Kouh Ouest Monts de Lam 3,727 8,087 Ouadda SOUTH SUDAN Sous- Dosseye 1,914 Kabo Bamingui Prefecture # IDPs CAMEROON ?! ! Markounda ! prefecture ?! Batangafo 5,168!31 Kaga-Bandoro ! 168 Yalinga Ouham Kabo 8,087 Ngaoundaye Nangha ! ! Wau Vina ?! ! Ouham Markounda 1,914 Paoua Boguila 229 Bocaranga Nana Mbres Ouham-Pendé Koui 406 Borgop Koui ?! Bakassa Bria Djema TOuham-Pendéotal Bocaranga 366 !406 !366 Bossangoa Bakala Ippy ! Mbéré Bozoum Bouca Others* Others* 375 ?! 281 Bouar Mala Total 11,148 Ngam Baboua Dekoa Tambura ?! ! Bossemtele 2,154 Bambari Gado 273 Sibut Grimari
    [Show full text]
  • GFD/FFA) Et Nutritionnel (Bfs) Dans La Bande Sahélien – 2014
    Operations d’assistance alimentaire (GFD/FFA) et nutritionnel (BFs) dans la bande sahélien – 2014 Meeting WFP/Partners 04/04/2014 Food Insecure Population (ENSA nov. 2013/CH mars 2014) Food insecure population (as per Food insecure population (as per CH Region ENSA projection - Nov.2013) projection - Mar.2014) Barh El gazel 78,910 88,542 Barh EL Gazel Nord 33,443 Barh El gazel Sud 45,467 Batha 63,981 39,939 Batha Est 24,248 Batha Ouest 20,854 Fitri 18,879 Guera 91,706 114,312 Abtouyour 21,696 Barh Signaka 19,445 Guera 34,276 Mangalme 16,289 Kanem 83,175 116,764 Kanem 37,763 Nord Kanem 24,557 Wadi-Bissam 20,855 Lac 49,052 20,762 Mamdi 19,235 Wayi 29,817 Ouaddaï 76,777 34,686 Abdi 10,242 Assoungha 22,682 Ouara 43,854 Sila 53,318 9,210 Djourouf Al Amar 14,039 Kimiti 39,279 Wadi Fira 130,095 158,459 Biltine 47,709 Dar-Tama 44,866 Kobe 37,521 Grand Total 627,014 582,674 Food Insecure Population &WFP Response Plan Food insecure population (as per Food insecure population (as per CH WFP Targeted Region ENSA projection - Nov.2013) projection - Mar.2014) Beneficiaries (GFD+FFA) GFD BF FFA Barh El gazel 78,910 88,542 83,188 60,000 11,739 4,636HH Barh EL Gazel Nord 33,443 20,000 20,000 11,739 On going Barh El gazel Sud 45,467 63,188 40,000 Batha 63,981 39,939 43,750 35,000 13,715 8,750 Batha Est 24,248 25,000 20,000 8,488 5,000 Batha Ouest 20,854 Fitri 18,879 18,750 15,000 5,227 3,750 Guera 91,706 114,312 60,750 52,000 8,082 8,750 Abtouyour 21,696 Barh Signaka 19,445 Guera 34,276 35,000 22,000 8,082 5,000 Mangalme 16,289 25,750 30,000 3,750 Kanem
    [Show full text]
  • Tchad: Situations De Conflits, Inondations Et Ennemis Des Cultures Mise À Jour Du 9 Octobre 2017
    Tchad: situations de conflits, inondations et ennemis des cultures Mise à jour du 9 octobre 2017 Légendes Tibesti Ouest TIBESTI Inondations Tibesti Est Conflits éleveurs Oiseaux granivores Chenilles légionnaires Fada ENNEDI OUEST Am-Djarass Borkou Yala ENNEDI EST 7 oct. à Koundjourou BORKOU (Dpt de Batha Ouest) Destruction des Borkou cultures par les Mourtcha oiseaux granivores à 14.000 ha envahies, Wadi Hawar 6.241,8 t détruites et Nord Kanem Kobé 4.964 ménages KANEM WADI FIRA Mégri touchés Biltine Barh-El-Gazel Nord 7 oct. Dar-Tama Batha Ouest à Ouaddi Faman Kanem BARH-EL-GAZEL Fouli (18.108 habitants) BATHA Batha Est Barh-El-Gazel Sud Ouara Assoungha dans la sous- Kaya LAC Wadi Bissam OUADDAÏ Wayi Barh-El-Gazel Ouest préfecture d’Arada Mamdi (Dpt de Biltine). Dagana Abdi Fitri Conflits ente HADJER-LAMIS Mangalmé Haraze-Al-Biar éleveurs 4 oct. N’Djamena Dababa Djourf Al Ahmar N'Djaména Guéra SILA 3 morts. Invasion de champ Abtouyour dans la banlieue de N'DJAMENA Kimiti Chari Baguirmi et du champ de GUÉRA Aboudéia maïs de l’ITRAD par CHARI-BAGUIRMI Inondations: Bahr-Azoum les chenilles Mayo-Lemié Barh-Signaka Salamat: Barh Azoum: env. 388,5 ha SALAMAT légionnaires détruites Loug-Chari Mayo-Boneye Mandoul: Mandoul Oriental: 42 villages, MAYO-KEBBI EST 1.445 personnes touchées, 1.453 ha. Pas Mayo-Binder Mont Illi Haraze-Mangueigne de données sur le Mandoul Oriental et Lac Léré Lac Iro Kabbia Tandjilé Est Bahr-Köh Barh Sara affectés aussi MAYO-KEBBI OUEST Tandjile OuestTANDJILÉ MOYEN-CHARI Tandjilé Centre Logone Oriental: Dpt de Nya Pende: Mayo-Dallah Mandoul Oriental Guéni Ngourkosso La Pendé 465 ha détruites – pas de ménages Lac Wey Dodjé MANDOUL touchés estimés La NyaMandoul Occidental LOGONE OCCIDENTAL Grande Sido Kouh Est Nya, Kouh-Est, Pende: pas de données LOGONE ORIENTAL Barh-Sara Kouh Ouest sur les personnes et superficies Monts de Lam La Nya Pendé Affectées Moyen Chari: Grande Sido: env.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Livelihood Zone Profiles for Chad
    RAPID LIVELIHOOD ZONE PROFILES A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) August 2011 Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 The Uses of the Profiles ............................................................................................................................ 4 Key Concepts ............................................................................................................................................. 5 What is in a Livelihood Profile .................................................................................................................. 7 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Rapid Livelihood Zone Profiles for Chad ....................................................................................................... 9 National Overview .................................................................................................................................... 9 Zone 1: South cereals and cash crops ..................................................................................................... 13 Zone 2: Southwest Rice Dominant .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAD Food Security Outlook June 2016 to January 2017
    CHAD Food Security Outlook June 2016 to January 2017 Early rains improve household food security in the Sudanian zone KEY MESSAGES Current food security outcomes for June 2016 The 2016 rainy season in the Sudanian zone began the middle of April, a month earlier than usual, which improved food consumption and shortened the lean season for pastoral households. Cumulative rainfall totals as of the second dekad of June show a large to moderate excess in practically all parts of this zone, allowing for early crop planting and raising expectations for average to above-average crop yields. Minimal (IPC Phase 1) food insecurity in the Sudanian zone will continue through January 2017. Reduced incomes from local livelihoods and cereal stock depletion in the Lac region due to security issues widened the food consumption gaps as the peak of the lean season approaches. These security problems are restricting access to land for the current growing season. High cereal prices are restricting food access. The entire region is in Crisis (IPC Phase 3), where it will stay through the month of October, when expected humanitarian assistance will contain food insecurity at Stressed (IPC Phase 2!) Source: FEWS NET This map shows relevant current acute food insecurity levels. outcomes for emergency decision-making. It does not reflect The scarcity of pasture lands is steadily eroding the physical chronic food insecurity. conditions of animals in the Hadjer Lamis, Barh El Gazel, Kanem, Batha, and Wadi Fira regions. The situation is becoming critical, with reports of a number of animal deaths in areas with virtually no watering holes.
    [Show full text]
  • TCHAD : Persistance D'une Situation Nutritionnelle Sérieuse À Critique En
    TCHAD : Persistance d’une situation ANALYSE IPC DE LA MALNUTRITION AIGUË Août 2019 – mai 2020 nutritionnelle sérieuse à critique en 2020 Publié en mars 2020 Facteurs déterminants de la MAG IPC Phase 3 & 4 Chiffres-clés août 2019 – mai 2020 - La mauvaise qualité de l’apport alimentaire : faible diversité alimentaire, régime alimentaire minimum Malnutrition aiguë sévère 461 186 acceptable inadéquate, faible fréquence minimum des Nombre de cas repas. -Augmentation de la morbidité due à: Diarrhée, 1 864 904 Malnutrition aiguë modérée 1 403 718 paludisme, Infections respiratoire aigüe, anémie et Nombre de cas rougeole. Enfants de 6-59 mois malnutris aigus -Mauvaises pratiques ANJE, faible couverture d’accès à 330 633 l’eau potable et conditions d’hygiène inadéquate. AYANT BESOIN D'UN TRAITEMENT au cours de Femmes enceintes ou allaitantes -Insécurité alimentaire aigue. l’année 2020 Malnutries aiguës -Insécurité résiduelle et conflits intercommunautaires. AYANT BESOIN D'UN TRAITEMENT Situation actuelle IPC malnutrition aiguë août –septembre 2019 Au total, 6 provinces et 27 Sévère à quel point ? combien ? et quand ? départements sont dans une situation nutritionnelle Sérieuse (IPC phase 3) à Critique (IPC phase 4) entre aout-septembre 2019, qui coïncide à la période de pic de la malnutrition. Il est estimé que plus que 1,8 million d’enfants de 6 à 59 mois souffriront de malnutrition aigüe durant l’année 2020 sur la base des résultats de l’enquête SMART nationale réalisée en aout 2019. Entre 0ctobre et décembre 2019, la situation devrait s’améliorer avec 4 provinces et 13 départements en situation Sérieuse à Critique. A partir de mai 2020, si des dispositions nécessaires ne seront pas prise, nous pourrions assister de nouveau à une détérioration assez marquée de la situation nutritionnelle avec 5 provinces et 16 départements qui basculeraient en phase Sérieuse à Critique (IPC Phase 3 et 4).
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Nigeria DTM COVID-19 Point of Entry Dashboard
    COVID-19 Point of Entry Dashboard 44: DTM North East Nigeria Nigeria 13 - 19 MARCH 2021 Fouli Kanem Fouli Fouli Kanem KEY FIGURES Fouli KayaKaya Kaya KanemKanem WadiKanem Bissam Wadi Bissam Lac Lac Wayi 3 Wayi 388 Mamdi Mamdi Points of Entry Total movements (incoming and outgoing) observed Mamdi OVERVIEW During the COVID-19 pandemic, IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) in Dagana Yobe DaganaDagana collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) monitors the Yobe Hadjer-Lamis movement to and from Nigeria's Adamawa and Borno States, located in the Hadjer-Lamis North East Zone. Assessments are conducted at Points of Entry located along Haraze-Al-BiarHaraze-Al-Biar Haraze-Al-Biar the border with Cameroon. Ghana Ghana Ngala Ngala RannRann NgalaNgala Rann Ngala N'Djamena 96 N'Djamena During the period 13 - 19 March 2021, 388 movements were observed at three 96 N'DjaménaN'Djaména 9 KalaKala balgebalge N'Djaména Borno Kala balge Borno Kala/BalgeKala/Balge Points of Entry in Borno State. Of the total movements recorded, 227 were Kala/Balge4848 JereJere 25 incoming from the Far North Region in Cameroon. Additionally, 161 outgoing Jere movements were recorded from Borno State to the Far North Region in Maiduguri ChariChari Cameroon. Chari Chari-Baguirmi BamaBama Chari-Baguirmi Bama BaguirmiBaguirmi Yobe Baguirmi Yobe 83Bama83Bama A range of data is collected during the assessment to better inform on Nigeria 15Bama travellers’ nationalities, sex, reasons for moving, mode of transportation and BankiBanki timeline of movement as shown in figures 1 to 4 below: ChadChad GwozaGwoza Gwoza NATIONALITIES OF TRAVELLERS (FIG. 1) SEX (FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Nigeria DTM COVID-19 Point of Entry Dashboard
    COVID-19 Point of Entry Dashboard: DTM North East Nigeria. Nigeria Monthly Snapshot May, 2020 23 444 Nord Kanem Kanem Kanem Points of Entry Incoming movements Fouli Barh-El-Gazel Sud Niger Republic 1 Lac Kaya Wadi Bissam OVERVIEW Abadam Chad Wayi Mamdi IOM DTM in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the state Ministry of Health Mobbar Kukawa Katsina Guzamala have been conducting monitoring of individuals moving into Nigeria's conflict-affected northeastern Nile Hadjer-Lamis Dagana Gubio states of Adamawa and Borno under pillar four (Points of entry) of COVID 19 preparedness and Monguno Nganzai Haraze-Al-Biar 1 Marte GhanaGhana Gate 4 Yobe Gamboru B response planning guidelines. Jigawa Ngala Magumeri 311 N'Djamena 3 Dikwa military gate N'Djaména Jere Mafa Kala/Balge 5 Borno Dikwa Maiduguri During the period 1 to 31 May 2020, 444 movements were observed at twenty three Points of Entries in Chari Kano Kaga 5 Konduga Baguirmi Bama Adamawa and Borno states. Of the total movements recorded, 367 were incoming from Extreme-Nord, Chari-Baguirmi Pulka immigrationBokko 46 from Nord, 14 from Quest, 6 from Nord-Quest, 5 from Centre in Cameroon; 5 from N’Djamena in Gwoza Damboa Motor park 5 Chad republic and 1 from Niger Republic . Tashan Tsamiya Vidik Mayo-Lemié Chibok Biu Madagali Extreme-Nord Kamale Askira/Uba 2 1 Michika Kwaya Kusar Hawul Mubi North Mayo-Boneye A range of data was collected during the assessment to better inform on migrants’ nationalities, gender, Gombe Nzakwa 367 2 Bauchi Bayo 2 Hong Monduva reasons for moving, mode of transportation and timeline of movement as shown in Figures 1 to 4 below: Kaduna 1 Shani Gombi 28 Madanya 3 Mubi South Nigeria 2 Shelleng Mayo-Binder Guyuk Song Maiha Mont Illi Belel Mayo-Kebbi Est Lac Léré MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED (FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR CAR Regional Situati
    Chari Guéra Mukjar As Salam - SD Logone-et-Chari Aboudéia Baguirmi Abtouyour Kimiti Tulus Gereida Mayo-Sava Rehaid Albirdi Abu Jabrah Mayo-Lemié Barh-Signaka Bahr-Azoum Diamaré SUDAN Um Dafoug CHAD Birao Bahr-Köh Mayo-Binder Mont Illi Moyo 8,437 Al Radoum Aweil North Mandoul Oriental Ouanda-Djalle Aweil West Mayo-Rey Ndele Dodjé La Nya Raja Barh-Sara Belom Aweil Centre CAMEROON Gondje ?! Kouh Ouest Monts de Lam Ouadda SOUTH SUDAN Dosseye Bamingui ?! Kabo 6,692 ?! Markounda Kaga-Bandoro Yalinga Ngaoundaye Nangha Wau Vina Batangafo ?! Paoua Boguila 132,810 Nana Mbres Borgop Koui ?! Bocaranga Bakassa BriaIDPs Djema Bouca Bakala Ippy Bozoum Mbéré ?! Bossangoa Bouar Mala Ngam Dekoa Tambura ?! Bossemtele Gado Sibut Grimari Bambari Rafai Baboua Obo Bogangolo Bakouma Lom-et-Djérem Baoro Zemio Bambouti Yaloke Ndjoukou Abba Bossembele Mingala Damara ?! ?!?! Kouango Gadzi Alindao Bangassou Amada-Gaza Boali ?! Mboti Carnot Timangolo ?! Boganangone Zangba Kembe Gambo Gamboula Bili Dungu Bosobolo Mobaye Ouango Ango Berberati Boganda ?! ?! Satema Mbile Mbaiki ?! Bimbo Gbadolite Inke Bondo Kadey Lolo Boda ?! Mobayi-Mbongo Bambio Libenge 92,053 ! Ngarissingo ? Boyabou Yakoma ?! Nola Niangara Mongoumba Gemena Businga Bambesa REPUBLIC ?! Haut-Nyong DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Boumba-et-Ngoko OF CONGO Aketi Poko Bayanga Ikpengbele OF THE CONGO Buta 15 Avril Budjala Bumba Kungu Lisala Rungu 6,981 UNHCR Representative Refugee camp UNHCR Sub-Office XXX Number of CAR Refugees Sembe Ouesso Bongandanga Banalia UNHCR Field Office ? Entry point The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map no not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. UNHCR Field Unite Sources: CAR Protection Cluster for IDP figures, UNHCR (for refugees in Cameroon, Chad and Congo), Local Authorities (for refugees in DRC) Feedback: [email protected].
    [Show full text]