DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimizing Fertilizer Use In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimizing Fertilizer Use In Optimizing Fertilizer Use in Results of a Baseline Survey of Fertileer ft1 Adoption in Arsi Zone 5- ? • \ /■'% o-%.\ / i t ' - Z ' ■''\s : / a - ? v 4 - » iVv- '■ i i ' f * ^ 4a Setotaw Ferede, Hugo Verkuijl,Douglas G. Tanner and Takele Gebre Study sponsored and implemented by $ e t ii \coO . ^ , c iM m y t . p f & Q * * < Ethiopian Agricultural international Maize and - •* > Research Organizat^J v Wheat Improvement Center Sasakawa-Global 2000 Ministry of Agriculture Optimizing Fertilizer Use in Ethiopia Results of a Baseline Survey of Fertilizer Adoption in Arsi Zone Setotaw Ferede, Hugo Verkuijl, Douglas G. Tanner, and Takele Gebre Study sponsored and implemented by Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Sasakawa-Globa! 2000 Ministry of Agriculture CIMMYT® 2000 Sasakawa-Global 2000, Addis Ababa 2000 Published by Sasakawa-Global 2000, c/o Ministry of Agriculture, Agriculture Extension Department, P.O. Box 12771, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Correct citation: Setotaw Ferede, H. Verkuijl, D. G. Tanner, and Takele Gebre. 2000. Optimizing fertilizer use in Ethiopia: Results of a baseline survey of fertilizer adoption in Arsi Zone. Addis Ababa: Sasakawa-Global 2000. CONTENTS List of Tables...................................... .............................................................................. iv Foreword......................................................... ...............................................................vii Acknowledgments............................... .......................................................................viii Executive Summary................................... .................................................................... ix 1. Introduction........... .....................................................................................................1 2. Methodology........................................................................................................... 4 3. Socio-economic characteristics of the study area................................................ 5 4. Fertilizer use and sources of financing............................................................... 10 5. Cropping patterns and fertilizer adoption .............................. ......................... 14 6. Farmers' perceptions of soil fertility management practices.....................,...31 7. Relationships among farmers' reported crop yields and measured soil parameters................................ ..................................................... 36 8. Conclusions and recommendations.................................................................... 45 References........................................................................................................- ........... 48 Appendices......................................................... ...........................................................49 LIST OF TABLES 3.1. Family composition and activities of average households............................................................5 3.2. Family age distribution of average households........................................................................... 5 3.3. Education of average households........................................... ........................................................... 6 3.4. Average land holding........................................................................................................................... 6 3.5. Reasons for sharing or renting-out land................ ...... .....:..............................................................6 3.6. Type of livestock owned...................................................................................................................... 7 3.7. Purpose of owning livestock................................................ ................................................... ;........7 3.8. Land allocation to different crops by wo red a ................ ........................ ........................................8 3.9. Priorities in the disposal of crops produced................................................................................— 8 3.10. Assets owned by surveyed farmers.................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Fertilizer prices and annual fertilizer consumption per farmer.................................................. 10 4.2. Farmers' sources of fertilizer.... ......................................................................................................... 11 4.3. Month of fertilizer purchase..... ...........,........................................................... ...............................12 4.4. Average distance of fertilizer distribution centers from farm ............................................... 12 4.5. Preferences for alternative fertilizer package sizes................................................................ 13 4.6. Reasons for preferences for alternative package sizes..;................................................................ 13 4.7. Sources of finance for fertilizer purchase.........................................................................................13 5.1. Adoption of wheat varieties ......................................................................................................... ■■ 14 5.2. Average area (per adopter) sown to individual wheat varieties.................................................14 5.3. Adoption of barley varieties...............................................................................................................15 5.4. Average area (per adopter) sown to individual barley varieties.................................................15 5.5. Soil types in relation to crop grown.................................................................................................. 16 5.6. Rotation crops...................................................................................................................................... 16 5.7. Farmers' perceptions of the advantages of crop rotation..............................................................16 5.8. Reasons for not using crop rotation............................. — ........................................................ 17 5.9. Frequency of ploughing with a mares ha ............................. ...........................................................18 5.10. Fertilizer rates adopted on major crops.................. ................................................................. 18 5.11. Method of applying DAP and urea................................................................... .............................. 18 5.12. Average hand weeding frequency in major crops.........................................................................19 5.13. Time of first and second hand weedings in wheat, barley, tef, and maize............................... 20 5.14. Herbicide rate by crop....................................................................... ................................................ 20 5.15. Time of herbicide application....................................................... .................................................... 21 5.16. Methods of harvesting and handling crops....................................................................................21 5.17. Yields of major crops.............................................................................................................................21 5.18. Wheat yield by variety........................................................................................................................22 5.19. Barley yield by variety............................................................................... ......................................... 22 5.20. Farmers' experience with fertilizer for wheat after break crops.................................................23 5.21. Fertilizer rates used on wheat after a break crop ........................................................................... 23 5.22. History of fertilizer adoption..... ............................... .................................................... .................. 23 5.23. Farmers' experience with fertilizer rates after legume break crops................. ................... 24 5.24. Reasons for reducing fertilizer rates after legume break crops....................................................24 5.25. Duration of reduced fertilizer rates after legume break crops........................................... .......24 5.26. Average duration of continuous production of wheat or barley........................................ ......24 5.27. Farmers' experience with wheat production without fertilizer............................................... 25 5.28. Reasons for producing wheat without fertilizer............................................... ............................. 25 5.29. Farmers' perceptions of the rate of fertilizer used on all wheat fields.......................................25 5.30. Factors affecting the rate of fertilizer applied on wheat fields.................................... ................ 26 5.31. Farmers' perceptions of yield difference due to changed fertilizer rates...................................26 5.32. Reasons for fertilizer application in alternate years....................................................................... 26 5.33. Timeliness of fertilizer delivery............. ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Download
    Integrated Blood Pressure Control Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Knowledge and Attitude of Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure Among Adult Hypertensive Patients on Follow-Up at Selected Public Hospitals in Arsi Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Integrated Blood Pressure Control Addisu Dabi Wake 1 Background: Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients is an Daniel Mengistu Bekele 2 important aspect of the management and prevention of complication related to hypertension. Techane Sisay Tuji 1 However, self-monitoring of BP among hypertensive patients on scheduled follow-up in hospitals in Ethiopia is unknown. The aim of the study was to assess knowledge and attitude 1Nursing Department, College of Medical and Health Sciences, Arsi University, of self-monitoring of BP among adult hypertensive patients. Asella, Ethiopia; 2School of Nursing and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 400 adult hypertensive patients attend- Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, ing follow-up clinics at four public hospitals of Arsi Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia The data were collected from patients from March 10, 2019 to April 8, 2019 by face-to-face interview using a pretested questionnaire and augmented by a retrospective patients’ medical records review. The data were analyzed using the SPSS version 21.0 software. Results: A total of 400 patients were enrolled into the study with the response rate of 97.6%. The median age of the participants was 49 years (range 23–90 years).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Report (Pdf)
    Working Together The sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages A WELL study produced under Task 510 by Brian Reed WELL Water and Environmental Health at London and Loughborough Water, Engineering and Development Centre Loughborough University Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK [email protected] www.lboro.ac.uk/WELL © LSHTM/WEDC, 2001 Reed, B.J. (2001) Working Together -the sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages WELL. Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 Draft final July 01 APC 2 Final 01/10/01 APC Designed and produced at WEDC Task Management by Andrew Cotton Quality Assurance by Andrew Cotton Cover photograph: Brian Reed (W/r Dirbe Ebrahem, village water committee member and w/r Likehesh Mengesha, tap attendant, Tereta, Ethiopia) WELL TASK 510 Working Together: draft final report Table of contents Table of contents...........................................................................................................................i List of tables................................................................................................................................ ii List of figures .............................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................iii Summary .......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Aalborg Universitet Restructuring State and Society Ethnic
    Aalborg Universitet Restructuring State and Society Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia Balcha, Berhanu Publication date: 2007 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Balcha, B. (2007). Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia. SPIRIT. Spirit PhD Series No. 8 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: November 29, 2020 SPIRIT Doctoral Programme Aalborg University Kroghstraede 3-3.237 DK-9220 Aalborg East Phone: +45 9940 9810 Mail: [email protected] Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia Berhanu Gutema Balcha SPIRIT PhD Series Thesis no. 8 ISSN: 1903-7783 © 2007 Berhanu Gutema Balcha Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia SPIRIT – Doctoral Programme Aalborg University Denmark SPIRIT PhD Series Thesis no.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Yield Potential and Yield Gaps of Faba Bean in Ethiopia
    Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci. 29(3)105-120 (2019) Wondafrash et al. [105] Quantifying Yield Potential and Yield Gaps of Faba Bean in Ethiopia Wondafrash Mulugeta1, Kindie Tesfaye2, Mezegebu Getnet3, Seid Ahmed4, Amsalu Nebiyu1, and Fasil Mekuanint5 1Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (JUCAVM) Jimma, Ethiopia. 2International Wheat and Maize Research Center (CIMMYT), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 3 International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 4 International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat, Morocco. 5 Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) አህፅሮት ኢትዮጵያ ባቄላ በዓለም አቀፍ ደረጃ በዋናነት ከሚመረትበቸው አገሮች አንዶ ናት፡፡ ነገር ግን የባቄላ ምርታማነትን በአገር አቀፍ ደረጃ በአማካይ በሄክታር ከ 2 ቶን አይበልጥም፡፡ ለዚህም ዝቅተኛ የዝራያዎች ምርታማነት ፣ ኋላ ቀር የሰብል ጥበቃና አያያዝ ፣ እንዲሁም የአፈር ለምነት መቀነስ እንደ ምክንያት ይጠቀሳሉ ፡፡ የዚህ ምርምር ጥናት ዓላማ የሰብል ዕድገት ሞዴልን በመጠቀም የባቄላን ከፍተኛ ምርታማነትን ካለምንም ማነቆዎች እና በዝናብ ዕጥረት ሁኔታ ያለውን ምርታማነት በመለየት ከአርሶ አደሩ ምርታማነት ጋር ያለውን ክፍተት ማወቅ ነው ፡፡ ለዚህም በኢትዮጵያ ሁኔታ ተስማሚነቱ የተሞከረ Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer(DSSAT)- CROPGRO-faba bean የተባለውን ሞዴል ተጠቅመናል፡፡ ይህም ከመሥክ በተገኘ መረጃ በንፅፅርና በማረጋገጥ ስሌት የተደገፈ ሲሆን የአርሶ አደሩን ምርታማነት ከተፃፉ መዛግብት ወስደናል፡፡ የጥናቱ ውጤት እንደሚያሳየው የባቄላ ምርታማነት ካለምንም ማነቆዎችና በዝናብ ዕጥረት ሁኔታ የምርታማነት ክፍተት በዋና ባቄላ አምራች ዞኖች ከፍተኛ ነው፡፡ በአሁኑ ወቅት በዋና ባቄላ አምራች ዞኖች የሚገኙ አርሶ አደሮች በዝናብ ዕጥረት ሁኔታ ከሚገኘው ምርታማነት በ40 % ያነሰ ምርት ያገኛሉ፡፡ የምርምር ጥናቱ ግኝት እንደሚያመለክተው ከፍተኛ ዝናብ የሚያገኙ ቦታዎች ከፍተኛ የምርታማነት ክፍተት ያሳያሉ ፡፡በተጨማሪ የምርታማነት ክፍተት ደረጃ ምርታማነት አቅምን ለመለየት በምንጠቀምባቸው ዠርያዎች ዓይነት ይወሰናል፡፡ በአጠቃላይ የጥናቱ ግኝት እንደሚያመለክተው የሰብል አያያዝን ትክክለኛና ወቅቱን የጠበቀ የሰብል ጥበቃ በሥራ ላይ በማዋል የባቄላ ምርታማነት ከ 100-300 % መጨመር ይቻላል፡፡ Abstract Ethiopia is one of the major faba bean growing countries in the world but with a low average national yield (≤ 2 t ha-1) compared to yield levels in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • WIDE3 Stage1 Paper on Ethiopia's Rural Youth
    LONG TERM PERSPECTIVES ON DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS IN RURAL ETHIOPIA YOUTH ON THE PATH TO ADULTHOOD IN CHANGING RURAL ETHIOPIA September 2011 Philippa Bevan with Rebecca Carter and Agazi Tiumelissan Acknowledgements Contributions to the thinking and evidence behind this paper have come from many sources. Chief among them are Alula Pankhurst, Catherine Dom and the many Ethiopian field researchers who have been engaged in the Ethiopia Longitudinal Community Study since it began in 1994. Funding for the research in the mid-1990s came from the UK Overseas Aid Administration (DFID's predecessor) and in the mid-2000s from the UK Economic and Social Research Council. The 2010 research was funded by J-GAM and this paper was commissioned by DFID. The paper includes Annex 1 prepared by Agazi Tiumelissan and Annex 2 by Rebecca Carter. Table of contents Part I: Introduction and conceptual framework -------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 Motivation for the paper .................................................................................................................................... 7 Young people in Ethiopia.................................................................................................................................... 8 Youth and policy in Ethiopia ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spiiced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nation State a Wrong Model for the Horn of Africa Edition Open Access
    The Nation State A Wrong Model for the Horn of Africa Edition Open Access Series Editors Ian T. Baldwin, Gerd Graßhoff, Jürgen Renn, Dagmar Schäfer, Robert Schlögl, Bernard F. Schutz Edition Open Access Development Team Lindy Divarci, Sylvia Szenti, Klaus Thoden The Edition Open Access (EOA) platform was founded to bring together publication ini­ tiatives seeking to disseminate the results of scholarly work in a format that combines tra­ ditional publications with the digital medium. It currently hosts the open­access publica­ tions of the “Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge” (MPRL) and “Edition Open Sources” (EOS). EOA is open to host other open access initia­ tives similar in conception and spirit, in accordance with the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the sciences and humanities, which was launched by the Max Planck Society in 2003. By combining the advantages of traditional publications and the digital medium, the platform offers a new way of publishing research and of studying historical topics or current issues in relation to primary materials that are otherwise not easily available. The volumes are available both as printed books and as online open access publications. They are directed at scholars and students of various disciplines, as well as at a broader public interested in how science shapes our world. The Nation State A Wrong Model for the Horn of Africa John Markakis, Günther Schlee, and John Young Studies 14 Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Studies 14 Cover Image: The wrong model: Nation states as islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Central Eastern Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED BULBULLA IAIP AND SHASHEMEME RTC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CENTRAL EASTERN OROMIA REGION, ETHIOPIA JuneOctober2020 2018 Report produced by: Engineer Tequam Water Resources Development and Environment Consultancy (ETWRDEC) 2nd Floor, Lex Plaza Building, Haile Gebre Sellassie Road, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia In collaboration with WSP/UNOPS On behalf of: UNIDO and Oromia Industrial Parks Development Corporation, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Preamble This ESIA report was an Initial document prepared in July 2018 for the Yirgalem IAIP and Dilla RTC to fulfill the National EIA requirements and AfDB ESS. The present ESIA report was submitted to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) in early 2018 for review and approval, following which it was approved by the stated National competent authority and has been issued with environmental clearance certificate to precede in late 2018. The review and approval process carried by the competent authority involved public disclosure and information dissemination of the ESIA findings contained in the document befor issuance of the environmental clearance. Valuable comments were also provided by the competent authority to be considered during the project implementation phases. The present review and update process of the ESIA carried during October 2020 was initiated to integrate the proposed project activities to be supported by the GCF funds. Efforts were also made to update the ESIA by addressing aspects that occurred in the IAIP and RTC during the past two years of implementation. The ESIA and RAP reports of IAIP and RTC have been prepared comprehensively covering the development of all infrastructure components and operational activities that will take place during the construction and operation phases of the IAIP and RTC project.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Mapping of Climate Change Risk and Vulnerability in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
    African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 22, Issue Supplement s4, pp. 807 - 818 ISSN 1021-9730/2014 $4.00 Printed in Uganda. All rights reserved ©2014, African Crop Science Society ANALYSIS AND MAPPING OF CLIMATE CHANGE RISK AND VULNERABILITY IN CENTRAL RIFT VALLEY OF ETHIOPIA L. GIZACHEW and A. SHIMELIS1 Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Biometerics, GIS and Agrometeorology (BGA) Research Process, P. O. Box 436, Ethiopia 1Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Head Quarter (HQ), Biometerics,GIS and Agrometeorology (BGA) Research Process, P. O. Box 2003, Ethiopia Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT There is growing demand for spatially explicit information among stakeholders across public and private institutions regarding vulnerability to climate change at the local scale. This study was conducted over 16 districts in Central Rift Valley (CRV) of Ethiopia, to determine the degree of climate risk and the relative vulnerability of the districts, to climate change and, thereby identify vulnerable hotspots. A biophysical and socio-economic indicator based integrated vulnerability assessment technique was used to map climate change vulnerability. Indicators were generated and analysed under three components of vulnerability, namely exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity; and finally aggregated into a single vulnerability index. The values of all indicators were normalised by considering their functional relationship with vulnerability, and expert judgment was then used to assign weights to all indicators. Aggregate vulnerability index (VI) was finally determined from the weighted sum of all indicators and mapped over the 16 districts. Selti, Dodotana-Sire and Tiyo districts had relatively high vulnerability to climate change; while Arsinegele, Adamitulu-Jido-Kombolcha and Dugda-Bora were the least vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Comprehensive Family Planning Training Evaluation
    Comprehensive Family Planning Training Evaluation Report Conducted in Ethiopia by FHI 360 November 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report contains findings from the evaluation undertaken by FHI 360 – Ethiopia on the comprehensive family planning training carried out by partners of Ethiopia’s Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) in October and November 2011. We are thankful to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for providing us with the funds to support the FMOH on family planning monitoring and evaluation activities. We are grateful to the FMOH for giving us the opportunity and support to evaluate and monitor the training of health professionals on comprehensive family planning methods. We are grateful to the staff of the Integrated Family Health Program (IFHP) for granting us permission to evaluate their training activities. We appreciate the willingness of trainees to allow us to observe them during their training, and the family planning clients who allowed us to observe them during the implant and IUCD insertion and removal procedures. DISCLAIMER This work was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Financial assistance was provided to FHI 360 by USAID under the terms of Cooperative Agreement GPO-A-00-08-00001-00 for the Program Research for Strengthening Services (PROGRESS) project. FHI 360 PROGRESS Project i ACRONYMS FHI 360 Family Health
    [Show full text]