DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural and Cultural Heritage Proposal 9 Revised Proposal For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural and Cultural Heritage Proposal 9 Revised Proposal For 3723 CCC Revised Proposal TRACKED 21.04.16 Page 1 of 323 Natural and Cultural Heritage Proposal 9 Revised Proposal for Topic 9.3 Historic 20 April 2016 3723 CCC Revised Proposal TRACKED 21.04.16 Page 2 of 323 Key: 1. Rules within this chapter which have immediate legal effect at the time of public notification are shown in blue. 2. Black bold underline and strikethrough are changes that were made to the notified proposal, and filed on 4 November 2015. 3. Red bold underline and strikethrough show further changes to the revised proposal of 4 November 2015, and are made in conjunction with Caroline Rachlin's evidence in chief filed on 18 December 2015. 4. Red bold underline and strikethrough changes made to Appendix 9.3.6.3 - Heritage Item and Heritage Setting Exemptions from Zone and Transport Rules as consequential changes resulting from decisions or current revised proposals of other Chapters and therefore are not notated with submission number and name references. 5. Purple bold underline and strikethrough show further changes to the revised proposal of 18 December 2015, and are made in conjunction with Caroline Rachlin's rebuttal evidence filed on 15 January 2016. 6. Green bold underline and strikethrough show further changes to the revised proposal of 17 January, made in conjunction with information tabled by Caroline Rachlin at the Proposal 9 Hearings on 2 February 2016. 7. Bold blue underline and strikethrough show further changes to: a. The 2 February tabled version (as relates to the objectives, policies and rules and the changes and new definitions of demolition and deconstruction respectively); and b. Those definitions which formed part of the revised proposal set out under point 5 above. With this including changes following mediations on 21, 22 and 30 March 2016 and discussions with submitters. Words in orange underlined are definitions and will be linked to the definition in Chapter 2. c. Minor changes which were made through Council's revised proposal of 16/03/16 as part of the definitions evidence / revised proposal for stage 2/3 definitions is shown within the definitions below (as italics - black bold underline and strikethrough). Note: This updated Revised Proposal includes only Section 1: Historic Heritage provisions, and Definitions for Historic Heritage. 3723 CCC Revised Proposal TRACKED 21.04.16 Page 3 of 323 9.3 Historic Heritage 9.3.1 Objective – Historic Heritage a. The contribution of Hhistoric heritage is maintained recognising the important contribution it makes to the district’s distinctive character and identity is maintained through the protection and conservation of significant and its role in recovery. b. Maintain historic heritage in a way which through: i. a. Enables and supports the ongoing use and adaptive re-use of The appropriate management of identified historic heritage values; and ii. b. Facilitatesing the retention, repair, and reconstruction recovery of damaged heritage items damaged in the Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011; while; and, iii. c. Recognising Takes into account the condition of buildings, particularly those that have suffered effects of the Canterbury earthquakes damage, and the effect of financial and engineering factors on the ability to retain, restore, and continue using them. heritage items. [#3721.418 - 422, Crown, pg90, and 3721.418.304, Crown, pg71] 9.3.2 Policies 9.3.2.1 Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Cultural Significance a. Work with Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and Papatipu Rūnanga to identify and assess sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance for listing in the District Plan, including culturally significant landscapes, wāhi tapu and wāhi taonga. b. List sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance in the District Plan and recognise and protect Ngāi Tahu values, including protection from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. c. Protect sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance listed in the District Plan, through providing for their protection from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. [#3722.1 Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu, pg3] 9.3.2.2 Policy - Protection of Significant Historic Heritage – Heritage Items and Heritage Settings a. Protect from inappropriate subdivision, use and development, heritage items and heritage settings which are listed in the District Plan as High Significance [Group 1], or Significant [Group 2]. The identification of significance [including for High Significance] is based on assessment according to the values set out under Policy 9.3.2.3 [i] – [vi], and the assessment for a level of High Significance under Policy 9.3.2.3[b]. [#3721, Crown, 3721.424, pg91] 3723 CCC Revised Proposal TRACKED 21.04.16 Page 4 of 323 9.3.2.321 Policy - Protection of Significant Historic Heritage - Identification and Assessment of Historic Heritage Places for Scheduling in the District plan Heritage Items and Heritage Settings - Assessment and Identification a. Identify historic heritage places which represent cultural and historic themes and activities of importance to the district, and assess them for significance according to the following values: i. Historical and social value:; Historical and social values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular person, group, organisation, institution, event, phase or activity; the continuity and/or change of a phase or activity; social, historical, traditional, economic, political or other patterns; ii. Cultural and spiritual value: ; Cultural and spiritual values that demonstrate or are associated with the distinctive characteristics of a way of life, philosophy, tradition, religion, or other belief, including: the symbolic or commemorative value of the place; significance to Tangata Whenua; and/or associations with an identifiable group and esteemed by this group for its cultural values; iii. Architectural and aesthetic value:; Architectural and aesthetic values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular style, period or designer, design values, form, scale, colour, texture and material of the place; iv. Technological and craftsmanship value:; Technological and craftsmanship values that demonstrate or are associated with: the nature and use of materials, finishes and/or technological or constructional methods which were innovative, or of notable quality for the period; v. Contextual value:; Contextual values that demonstrate or are associated with: a relationship to the environment (constructed and natural), a landscape, setting, group, precinct or streetscape; a degree of consistency in terms of type, scale, form, materials, texture, colour, style and/or detail; recognised landmarks and landscape which are recognised and contribute to the unique identity of the environment; and vi. Archaeological and scientific significance value; Archaeological or scientific values that demonstrate or are associated with: the potential to provide information through physical or scientific evidence an understanding about social historical, cultural, spiritual, technological or other values of past events, activities, structures or people; and b. Assess whether the historic heritage places has met a level of either for High 'Significant' ce or High Significance, through assessing it against the following: based on whether they have: i. To meet the level of Significant (Group 2) the historic heritage place must: A. Meet at least one of the values under Policy 9.3.2.1 (a)(i)-(vi) at a significant or high level; and 3723 CCC Revised Proposal TRACKED 21.04.16 Page 5 of 323 B. Be of significance to the Christchurch District (and may also be of significance nationally or internationally), because it conveys aspects of the district's contextual/thematic development, and thereby contributes to the district's sense of place and identity; and C. Have a moderate degree of authenticity (based on physical and documentary evidence) to justify that it is of significance to the district ; and D. Have a moderate degree of integrity (based on how whole or intact it is) to clearly demonstrate that it is of significance to the district. ii. To meet High Significance (Group 1) the historic heritage place must: A. Meet at least one criterion of the values under (a)(i)- (vi) above at a high level; and B. Be of significance to the Christchurch District (and may also be of significance nationally or internationally), because it conveys important aspects of the district's contextual/thematic development, and thereby makes a strong contribution to the district's sense of place and identity, and C. Have a high degree of authenticity (based on physical and documentary evidence); and D. Have a high degree of integrity (particularly whole or intact heritage fabric and heritage values). (i) a high degree of authenticity (based on physical and documentary evidence) ,; and (ii) a high degree of authenticity and/or integrity (particularly whole or intact heritage fabric and values) [including overall form and level of intactness], and (iii) and have a high overall significance to the district, or beyond the district, make an important because they: A. convey important aspects of contribution to the district's contextual development; and B. because of their important contribution to district sense of place and identity; and [#3721.25, Crown; #3630.6, Annandale, pg5; #3646.11, GT Developments (2011) Ltd, p6] c. Schedule List (#3674, Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga) significant historic heritage places [heritage as heritage items and heritage settings] where: (i) The thresholds for that are of High Significance (Group 1)and Significant (Group 2) or High Significance (Group 1) in the District Plan,. are met as outlined in 9.3.2.1b; and and protect them from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. [#3721.424, Crown, pg 91] (ii) The physical condition of the heritage item, and any necessary retention, repairs or reinstatement work would not significantly compromise the heritage values and 3723 CCC Revised Proposal TRACKED 21.04.16 Page 6 of 323 integrity of the heritage item to the extent that it would no longer retain its heritage significance; unless (iii) Any engineering and financial factors are identified that would make it unreasonable to schedule the heritage item.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Future Christchurch Update
    Future Christchurch Update The voice of the Canterbury rebuild MAY 2016 Regenerate Christchurch board announced Page 3 Exciting time for Sumner Pages 6–7 SCIRT – rebuilding stronger and better Pages 8–9 Pacific women celebrating post-quake identity Page 14 Words designed to reflect the feelings of the people of Christchurch now adorn this 100-metre-long wall in the central city as part of this year’s SPECTRUM Festival. Street art for the people of Christchurch I always knew you would come back. Local writer Hannah Herchenbach came up with the They were painted on a prominent wall in the South phrase, I always knew you would come back. Frame by international street artist Elliott Routledge, These are the words that took out the recent WORD aka Numskull (pictured above). UP competition to find a phrase that captured the way Festival Director George Shaw says the words Christchurch people feel about their city. describe the personal journey that resonates with More details on page 15. many Christchurch people. WORD UP formed part of the finale of the third annual SPECTRUM street art festival in central Christchurch. Future Christchurch Update May 2016 CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Karleen Edwards Inside: Christchurch City Council Chief Executive Officer 3 New regeneration leaders announced This month we experienced organisations which will have such an and development of much-loved a significant development in impact on our city’s rejuvenation. I am community facilities such as the 4–5 Christchurch City Christchurch’s rebuild journey. confident that in working alongside new Aranui-Wainoni Community Council facilities Regenerate Christchurch and Ōtākaro Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch City Council Agenda
    CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA THURSDAY 9 JULY 2015 9.30AM COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET We’re on the Web! www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/Agendas/ AGENDA - OPEN CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Thursday 9 July 2015 at 9.30am in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street Council: The Mayor, (Chairperson). Councillors, Vicki Buck, Jimmy Chen, Phil Clearwater, Pauline Cotter, David East, Jamie Gough, Yani Johanson, Ali Jones, Glenn Livingstone, Paul Lonsdale, Raf Manji, Tim Scandrett, Andrew Turner ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO 1. APOLOGIES 1 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST 1 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1 4. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS 1 5. REPORT OF THE AKAROA/WAIREWA COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 6 MAY 2015 3 6. REPORT OF THE LYTTELTON/MT HERBERT COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 20 MAY 2015 7 7. REPORT OF THE HAGLEY/FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 3 JUNE 2015 13 8. REPORT OF THE HAGLEY/FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 17 JUNE 2015 19 9. REPORT OF THE RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 2 JUNE 2015 23 10. REPORT OF THE RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 16 JUNE 2015 33 11. REPORT OF THE JOINT EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF THE SPREYDON/HEATHCOTE 39 COMMUNITY BOARD AND RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD OF 8 JUNE 2015 12. REPORT OF THE SHIRLEY/PAPANUI COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 3 JUNE 2015 61 13. REPORT OF THE SHIRLEY/PAPANUI COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 17 JUNE 2015 73 14. REPORT OF THE SPREYDON/HEATHCOTE COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 3 JUNE 2015 79 15. REPORT OF THE BURWOOD/PEGASUS COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 2 JUNE 2015 85 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Three Year Plan
    CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY 24, TUESDAY 25 AND WEDNESDAY 26 JUNE 2013 9.30AM COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET We’re on the Web! www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/Agendas/ AGENDA - OPEN CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Monday 24, Tuesday 25 and Wednesday 26 June 2013 at 9.30am in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street Council: The Mayor, Bob Parker (Chairperson). Councillors Peter Beck, Helen Broughton, Sally Buck, Ngaire Button, Tim Carter, Jimmy Chen, Barry Corbett, Jamie Gough, Yani Johanson, Aaron Keown, Glenn Livingstone, Claudia Reid and Sue Wells. ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. 1. APOLOGIES 1 2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES – DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN HEARINGS PANEL MEETINGS OF: 1 13 MAY, 14 MAY AND 15 MAY 2013 3. RELOCATION OF THE CHRISTCHURCH KART CLUB AND THE CANTERBURY 5 GREYHOUNDS, CARRS RESERVE, HALSWELL 4. RECOMMENDED THREE YEAR PLAN 2013-16 23 APPENDIX – A AN ANALYSIS OF THE WRITTEN AND VERBAL SUBMISSIONS 27 MADE IN RESPONSE TO THE DRAFT 2013-16 THREE YEAR PLAN, AS WELL AS A SUMMARY OF THE SUBMISSIONS AND MAYOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS WITH REGARD TO THEM APPENDIX – B SUMMARY OF THE MAYOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS 67 APPENDIX – C A SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL CHANGES TO THE DRAFT THREE 77 YEAR PLAN, SHOULD THE MAYOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS BE ADOPTED APPENDIX – D A SCHEDULE CONTAINING THE RATES INFORMATION REQUIRED 79 TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE 2013-16 THREE YEAR PLAN APPENDIX – E SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT PLAN, STAFF 81 COMMENTS AND MAYOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1 COUNCIL 24. 6. 2013, 25. 6. 2013 AND 26. 6. 2013 1.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2008 NEWSLETTER
    NEWSLETTER January 2008 NEWS Gordon Kirk, QSM Gordon’s skills however, extended far beyond building tracks. He was The 25th July last year was a sad very active in the Society’s objection occasion for the Society, with the death to the construction of the gondola, of Gordon Kirk. Gordon, whose obituary and the experience he gained in the appeared in the Christchurch Press, complexities of planning and the made a very significant contribution Resource Management Act was a to the Society and its work over many major asset to the Society. Gordon years, covering the whole range of our went on to be active in the lengthy activities. He was a past President, and processes associated with the Banks a regular attendee at Board meetings, Peninsula District Plan, the Selwyn where he could be relied on to ensure District Plan and Christchurch’s City that there was a lively debate about Plan, and numerous other planning- many of the issues we have looked at related issues dealt with by the Society over the years. Gordon was awarded since. the Queen’s Service Medal for services Gordon’s most important and visible 1925–2007 to the voluntary sector. legacy, however, is Ohinetahi Reserve. Gordon was an early member of the From his own detailed knowledge of hill work parties, and in the 1980’s was the Port Hills, Gordon identified an Gordon recognised the importance of the leading figure in creating the Mt opportunity for the Society to purchase having the local community on board, Pleasant Bluffs Track. Looking at the land above Governors Bay, and and put a lot of effort into the area track now, which many people consider persuaded the Board that to become around the Bay Heights entrance to one of the best and most impressive a landowner was the Society’s next the reserve, which is now showing on the Port Hills, it is easy to overlook logical step in its development.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Published Sources on Christchurch
    Local history resources An annotated bibliography of published sources on the history of Christchurch, Lyttelton, and Banks Peninsula. Map of Banks Peninsula showing principal surviving European and Maori place-names, 1927 From: Place-names of Banks Peninsula : a topographical history / by Johannes C. Andersen. Wellington [N.Z.] CCLMaps 536127 Introduction Local History Resources: an annotated bibliography of published sources on the history of Christchurch, Lyttelton and Banks Peninsula is based on material held in the Aotearoa New Zealand Centre (ANZC), Christchurch City Libraries. The classification numbers provided are those used in ANZC and may differ from those used elsewhere in the network. Unless otherwise stated, all the material listed is held in ANZC, but the pathfinder does include material held elsewhere in the network, including local history information files held in some community libraries. The material in the Aotearoa New Zealand Centre is for reference only. Additional copies of many of these works are available for borrowing through the network of libraries that comprise Christchurch City Libraries. Check the catalogue for the classification number used at your local library. Historical newspapers are held only in ANZC. To simplify the use of this pathfinder only author and title details and the publication date of the works have been given. Further bibliographic information can be obtained from the Library's catalogues. This document is accessible through the Christchurch City Libraries’ web site at https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/local-history-resources-bibliography/
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday 27 June 2013 9.30Am Council Chamber, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street
    CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA THURSDAY 27 JUNE 2013 9.30AM COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET We’re on the Web! www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/Agendas/ AGENDA - OPEN CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Thursday 27 June 2013 at 9.30am in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street Council: The Mayor, Bob Parker (Chairperson). Councillors Peter Beck, Helen Broughton, Sally Buck, Ngaire Button, Tim Carter, Jimmy Chen, Barry Corbett, Jamie Gough, Yani Johanson, Aaron Keown, Glenn Livingstone, Claudia Reid and Sue Wells. ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. 1. APOLOGIES 1 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 1 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - COUNCIL MEETINGS OF 30 MAY 2013 AND 13 JUNE 2013 1 4. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS 1 5. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY, RECREATION AND CULTURE 21 COMMITTEE MEETING OF 4 JUNE 2013 6. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE: MEETING OF 5 JUNE 2013 131 7. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE: MEETING OF 18 JUNE 2013 185 8. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE: 201 MEETING OF 6 JUNE 2013 9. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE CORPORATE AND FINANCIAL COMMITTEE: MEETING 277 OF 7 JUNE 2013 10. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT SUBCOMITTEE: 323 MEETING OF 29 MAY 2013 11. REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE JOINT FENDALTON/WAIMAIRI AND SHIRLEY/PAPANUI 325 COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING OF 28 MAY 2013 12. REPORT OF THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE HAGLEY FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD: 337 MEETING OF 18 JUNE 2013 13. REGISTER OF COUNCILLOR’S INTEREST 423 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Symphony Orchestra 16, 17, 18 Bershire Quartet 44, 45 Beryl Kimber L9 N.Z.B.C
    .3‘ THE CHRISTCURCH PAN PACIFIC ARTS FESTIVAL 26th FEBRUARY to 6th MARCH, 1964 CONTENTS Page Page Foreword 3 Festival Evensong 29 Mayor’s Message 5 New Zealand Ballet Company 30, 31 Chairman’s Message 7 Places of Interest in Christchurch 32, 33 . t _ Sponsors 9 York Cycle of Mystery Plays 34, 35 1* ‘Mi'iiiiii . _ ~ '. I _ ' ~. "I ' - z , Festival Committee 10 Decorations 37 4 ‘ " ' Committees 11 New Zealand Opera Company 38, 39, 40 Christchurch—the Festival City 12, 13 Japanese Floral Art 41 Sir Malcolm Sargent 14, 15 Horticultural Exhibition 43 Victorian Symphony Orchestra 16, 17, 18 Bershire Quartet 44, 45 Beryl Kimber l9 N.Z.B.C. Symphony Orchestra 46, 47 Festival Choir 20, 21 Soloists with the Orchestra 48, 49 Timetable 22, 23 University of Denver Jazz Band 50, 51 Exhibitions 25 Brass Bands 53 Shoji Hamada 26, 27, 28 Massed Children’s Choir 54, 55 Christchurch Cathedral Festival Massed Children’s Orchestra 57 Recitals 28 Vintage Cars 60, 61 Credits for Photographs: Christchurch “Star,” New Zealand Broadcasting Corporation, Australian Broadcasting Commission, Canterbury Museum, George Scandrett, Robin Smith. Inside front cover: Dr. Barker took this view of Oxford Terrace, from just south of Gloucester ‘ Street, in 1858. Inside back cover: A recent aerial view of Christchurch City. 1 FOREWORD Rt. Hon. K. I. HOLYOAKE Prime Minister Prime Minister, Wellington, New Zealand The City of Christchurch has a long-standing and enviable reputation for its cultivation and appreciation of the arts. I’m sure this reputation will stand even WE ARE TIIE higher following the staging of the Christchurch Pan Pacific Arts Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Hackthorne Road, Christchurch
    DISTRICT PLAN –LISTED HERITAGE PLACE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HERITAGE ITEM NUMBER 230 SIGN OF THE TAKAHE AND SETTING – 200 HACKTHORNE ROAD,CHRISTCHURCH PHOTOGRAPH: M.VAIR-PIOVA, 5/01/2015 HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE Historical and social values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular person, group, organisation, institution, event, phase or activity; the continuity and/or change of a phase or activity; social, historical, traditional, economic, political or other patterns. The Sign of the Takahe has high historical and social significance for its association with politician and conservationist Harry Ell (1862-1934) and as a key element within his visionary Summit Road scheme. The great life-long preoccupation of Ell, who served both as a central and local government politician, was the promotion of a summit road from Godley Head to Akaroa, providing public access to all parts of the Port Hills. Resthouses would be distributed along the route, offering refreshments and modest accommodation. The Summit Road Association was founded by Ell in 1909 to foster the objective, and although the ambitious project was incomplete at the time of his death, he had seen a substantial portion of his scheme to fruition, including the establishment of four resthouses: the Signs of the Kiwi, Bellbird, Packhorse and Takahe. The Sign of the Takahe was planned from the beginning to be the largest and most important of the resthouses. Construction of the building, begun in 1918, was sufficiently advanced for Page 1 the Tram Terminus Resthouse, as it was then known, to open for business in 1920. Argument, financial difficulty, depression and war delayed completion, however, and it was not until 1948 that the building was finally finished.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda
    CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA THURSDAY 3 AND FRIDAY 4 OCTOBER 2013 9.30AM COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET We’re on the Web! www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/Agendas/ AGENDA - OPEN CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Thursday 3 and Friday 4 October 2013 at 9.30am in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street Council: The Mayor, Bob Parker (Chairperson). Councillors Peter Beck, Helen Broughton, Sally Buck, Ngaire Button, Tim Carter, Jimmy Chen, Barry Corbett, Jamie Gough, Yani Johanson, Aaron Keown, Glenn Livingstone, Claudia Reid and Sue Wells. ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. 1. APOLOGIES 1 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST 1 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - COUNCIL MEETINGS OF: 1 29 AUGUST 2013 – 2 SEPTEMBER 2013, 6 SEPTEMBER 2013, 12 SEPTEMBER 2013 AND EXTRAORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING OF 19 SEPTEMBER 2013 4. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 1 5. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS 1 6. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE BURWOOD/PEGASUS COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING OF 31 2 SEPTEMBER 2013 7. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE BURWOOD/PEGASUS COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING OF 37 16 SEPTEMBER 2013 8. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE FENDALTON/WAIMAIRI COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING 45 OF 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 9. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE FENDALTON/WAIMAIRI COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING 51 OF 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 10. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE HAGLEY/FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING OF 63 4 SEPTEMBER 2013 11. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE HAGLEY/FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD: MEETING OF 73 18 SEPTEMBER 2013 12. REPORT OF A MEETING OF THE LYTTELTON/ MT HERBERT COMMUNITY BOARD: 109 MEETING OF 22 AUGUST 2013 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Christchurch Replacement District Plan Hearings Panel
    BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan) Order 2014 AND IN THE MATTER of the Natural and Cultural Heritage Stage 3 Proposal MEMORANDUM OF COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL 7 MARCH 2016 Barristers & Solicitors Simpson Grierson M G Conway / M J Jagusch Telephone: +64-4-499 4599 Facsimile: +64-4-472 6986 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] DX SX11174 PO Box 2402 WELLINGTON MAY IT PLEASE THE PANEL: 1. This memorandum is filed on behalf of the Christchurch City Council (Council) in response to the Minute of the Panel dated 3 March 2016 regarding the Natural and Cultural Heritage Proposal (Minute). This memorandum addresses matters relating to Topic 9.3: Historic Heritage and Topic 9.4: Significant Trees. TOPIC 9.4: SIGNIFICANT TREES 2. The Minute granted leave for the Council to file a memorandum by 7 March 2016 confirming any request for leave to file supplementary evidence. Mediation on Thursday 3 March was helpful, and the Council does not consider that supplementary evidence or further formal engagement with interested parties will be necessary in relation to Topic 9.4 except to the extent envisaged by the timetable proposed below. While not all matters have been resolved, the Council anticipates that, by the time closings are filed, the points of disagreement will be reduced and clearly defined. The proposed process set out below is similar to that which was sought for Topic 9.1: Indigenous Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Council 2002 Civic Awards Otahuna Outing 22 September 2002
    Council 2002 Civic Awards John Willocks & The Eastenders We are pleased to report the presenting of a Community Service Award to John Willocks by the Hagley-Ferrymead Community Board on 10th October. The citation reads: ‘John has been a member of the ‘Eastenders’ work party for many years and its co-ordinator for the last ten years. The Eastenders work on the Eastern Port Hills building and maintaining tracks, planting trees and controlling weeds. As part of the Summit Road Society, they work closely with the Christchurch City Council’s Park Rangers and other groups such as Turning Point 2000. Under John’s leadership membership of the group has grown and the number of days worked Otahuna Outing 22 September 2002 and the scope of work has The photo shows Geoffrey Rice addressing members during the also increased.’ Otahuna Outing. Dr Rice of the History Department at the The Society congratu- University of Canterbury last year published a book on Sir Robert Heaton Rhodes. His address described the human side and lates John Willocks for achievements of the man who created the house and garden we well-deserved recogni- were visiting and who dominated many aspects of Christchurch tion of his considerable life in the first half of the twentieth century. Your editor added efforts on our behalf. details about the Otahuna garden in the context of Christchurch As he himself remarked, garden history. the award is also rec- We were relieved to finally hold this outing. Twice cancelled due ognition of the contri- to the weather, this time a near-gale was blowing during the butions to public en- morning, which posed a potential danger in this tree-clad garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavilions, Temples & Four Square Walls
    THE ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE OF CHRISTCHURCH 10. Pavilions, temples & four square walls Christchurch pump houses and substations CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Preface The features of Christchurch today are to a large extent those history and thus their significance within their own community of the built environment. The charm of the city essentially or to the city as a whole. Many buildings are lost when they depends on the buildings, places and objects planned by simply fail to continue to meet the requirements of the community people over successive generations. The quiet dignity of the they were built for. Although the City Plan and the New Zealand city owes much to its early buildings. It is still possible to trace Historic Places Trust Pouhere Taonga encourage the the early European built history of Christchurch in the many fine preservation of historic buildings and objects it is essentially examples of colonial architecture that remain. Action by the the determination of the community that effectively protects City Council, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust Pouhere and revitalizes buildings it considers important. Taonga and other public interest groups has saved a number of important city buildings including the The Rose Chapel One of the major aims of the series, The Architectural Heritage (former Sisters of Mercy Chapel), the Sydenham Methodist of Christchurch, is the identification and description of the city’s Church, the former convent of the Sisters of Our Lady of the valuable historic buildings in the hope that greater public Missions (now the Music Centre, the Nurses Chapel, the awareness of their importance will increase their chance of former University (now the Arts Centre) and the former survival.
    [Show full text]