The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought: Toward an Integrated Global Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought: Toward an Integrated Global Assessment A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Nkonya, Ephraim et al. Working Paper The economics of desertification, land degradation, and drought: Toward an integrated global assessment ZEF Discussion Papers on Development Policy, No. 150 Provided in Cooperation with: Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung / Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn Suggested Citation: Nkonya, Ephraim et al. (2011) : The economics of desertification, land degradation, and drought: Toward an integrated global assessment, ZEF Discussion Papers on Development Policy, No. 150, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/84788 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ZEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 150 Ephraim Nkonya, Nicolas Gerber, Philipp Baumgartner, Joachim von Braun, Alex De Pinto, Valerie Graw, Edward Kato, Julia Kloos, Teresa Walter The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought Toward an Integrated Global Assessment Bonn, May 2011 The CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH (ZEF) was established in 1995 as an international, interdisciplinary research institute at the University of Bonn. Research and teaching at ZEF addresses political, economic and ecological development problems. ZEF closely cooperates with national and international partners in research and development organizations. For information, see: www.zef.de. ZEF – Discussion Papers on Development Policy are intended to stimulate discussion among researchers, practitioners and policy makers on current and emerging development issues. Each paper has been exposed to an internal discussion within the Center for Development Research (ZEF) and an external review. The papers mostly reflect work in progress. The Editorial Committee of the ZEF – DISCUSSION PAPERS ON DEVELOPMENT POLICY include Joachim von Braun (Chair), Solvey Gerke, and Manfred Denich. Ephraim Nkonya, Nicolas Gerber, Philipp Baumgartner, Joachim von Braun, Alex De Pinto, Valerie Graw, Edward Kato, Julia Kloos, Teresa Walter, The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought Toward an Integrated Global Assessment, ZEF- Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 150, Center for Development Research, Bonn, May 2011, pp. 184. ISSN: 1436-9931 Published by: Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung (ZEF) Center for Development Research Walter-Flex-Straße 3 D – 53113 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-73-1861 Fax: +49-228-73-1869 E-Mail: [email protected] www.zef.de The authors: Ephraim Nkonya , International Food Policy Research Institute. Contact: [email protected] Nicolas Gerber , Center for Development Research. Contact: [email protected] Philipp Baumgartner , Center for Development Research. Contact: [email protected] Joachim von Braun , Center for Development Research. Contact: [email protected] Alex De Pinto , International Food Policy Research Institute. Contact: [email protected] Valerie Graw , Center for Development Research. Contact: [email protected] Edward Kato , International Food Policy Research Institute. Contact: [email protected] Julia Kloos , Center for Development Research. Contact: [email protected] Teresa Walter , formerly with Center for Development Research (ZEF), now with Department of Land Use Economics in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim. Contact: teresa.walter@uni- hohenheim.de Contents Acknowledgments vii Executive Summary viii 1. Introduction 1 2. Assessment of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought 11 3. Economics of DLDD 60 4. Actors, Incentives, and Institutions Governing Land Management 85 5. Actions for Improvements 93 6. Case Studies 103 7. Partnership Concept 121 8. Conclusions 133 Appendix A: Supplementary Tables 137 Appendix B: Supplementary Figures 151 Abbreviations and Acronyms 153 References 156 iii List of Figures Table 2.1—GLASOD (1991) extent of human-induced soil degradation (in million hectares) 13 Table 2.2—Nitrogen application rates in selected eastern and southern African countries 24 Table 2.3—Global land degradation assessment studies 34 Table 2.4—Trends in the spatial extent of drought for various baseline values 38 Table 2.5—Estimated effect of climate change on drought frequency in 2030 39 Table 2.6—Extent and severity of global soil nutrient depletion, 1990–1999 (in million hectares) 41 Table 2.7— Selected variables used to analyze relationships with NDVI 50 Table 2.8—Correlation of NDVI with selected biophysical and socio-economic factors 51 Table 2.9—OLS regression of mean NDVI on selected biophysical and socio-economic variables 54 Table 3.1—Main valuation techniques 72 Table 3.2—Drought loss, 1900–2004 82 Table 3.3—Economic valuation techniques for the estimation of various types of costs 83 Table 4.1—List of actors affecting land use decisions 88 Table 5.1—Type of land degradation and their solutions 94 Table 5.2—Status, trend, and drivers of pastoral livestock population 98 Table 6.1—Land resources and severity of land degradation 104 Table 6.2—Effects of increased salinity on yields and profit for wheat and cotton, Uzbekistan 105 Table 6.3—Soil loss, yields, and profit for land in different slope classes, Uzbekistan 106 Table 6.4—Adoption rates of land management practices in Kenya and Niger 107 Table 6.5—Trend of total factor productivity growth of major crops, India 114 Table 6.6—Economic loss due to overgrazing, Kenya 116 Table 6.7—Value of tropical forest ecosystem goods and services 120 Table 7.1—Partnerships and the role and strengths of partners in conducting global E-DLDD 126 Table 7.2—Essential climate variable monitoring programs of the terrestrial ecosystem services (part of SB1 and SB2) 129 Table 7.3—Example of E-DLDD research partnership team (SB1) 131 Table A.1—Land degradation assessments on the national level 137 Table A.2—Land degradation assessment on the local and subnational levels 138 Table A.2—Continued 139 Table A.3—Review of studies estimating off-site costs of land degradation (in chronological order) 139 Table A.4—Review of studies estimating the net present value (NPV) of returns to different conservation measures (in chronological order) 144 Table A.5—Costs of land degradation (mainly soil erosion) 149 iv List of Figures Figure 1.1—Conceptual framework for assessing the costs of action versus the costs of inaction regarding DLDD (with net present value outcomes). 4 Figure 1.2—Costs and benefits—Concepts 5 Figure 1.3—Prevention, mitigation, and rehabilitation costs over time 8 Figure 1.4—Illustration of the vicious circle connecting poverty, discount rates, and land degradation 9 Figure 2.1—GLASOD (1991) global assessment of the status of human-induced soil degradation 14 Figure 2.2—Desertification vulnerability 15 Figure 2.3—Areas vulnerable to human-induced desertification 16 Figure 2.4—Loss of annual NPP, GLADA, 1981–2003 20 Figure 2.5—Degraded area as a percentage of total global degraded land area across agroclimatic zones, GLADA, 1981–2003 20 Figure 2.6—Areas most affected by land degradation, GLADA, 1981–2003 21 Figure 2.7—Annual loss of NPP in eastern and southern Africa, 1981–2003 22 Figure 2.8—Yield trend of major cereals in southern Africa, 1981–2009 23 Figure 2.9—Yield trend of major cereals in eastern Africa, 1981–2009 23 Figure 2.10—Cereal yield trend in Cameroon, 1981–2009 23 Figure 2.11—Long-term degradation of green biomass 25 Figure 2.12—Areas affected by human-induced land degradation measured by a declining NDVI (Change in NDVI from 1982–2003 with a three-year base- and endline) 26 Figure 2.13—The six axes of GLADIS: Four biophysical axes (green) and two socioeconomic axes (pink) 27 Figure 2.14—Ecosystem Service Status Index, GLADIS 28 Figure 2.15—Land Degradation Index (LDI), GLADIS 29 Figure 2.16—Biophysical Degradation Index (BDI), GLADIS 29 Figure 2.17—Land Degradation Impact Index (LDII), GLADIS 30 Figure 2.18—Methods for the assessment of land degradation 40 Figure 2.19—Trend of per capita arable land across regions 46 Figure 2.20—Relationship between change in NDVI and population density 51 Figure 2.21—Relationship between GDP and NDVI 52 Figure 2.22—Relationship between government effectiveness and NDVI 52 Figure 2.23—Relationship between fertilizer application and NDVI 53 Figure 2.24—Impact of soil erosion on wheat yield 55 Figure 2.25—Impact of soil erosion on maize yield 55 Figure 2.26—Impact of soil erosion on millet
Recommended publications
  • Keeping Global Warming Within 1.5°C Constrains Emergence of Aridification
    ` Keeping global warming within 1.5°C constrains emergence of aridification Chang-Eui Park1, Su-Jong Jeong1*, Manoj Joshi2, Timothy J. Osborn2, Chang-Hoi Ho3, Shilong Piao4,5,6, Deliang Chen7, Junguo Liu1, Hong Yang8,9, Hoonyoung Park3, Baek-Min Kim10, Song Feng11 1School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen, China 2Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK 3School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 4Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 5Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 6Center for Excellence in Tibetan Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 8EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland 9Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 10Korea Polar Research Institution, Inchon, Korea 11Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 72701, AR, USA Nature Climate Change (Accepted) *Corresponding author: Prof. Su-Jong Jeong, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China ([email protected]) ` Aridity – the ratio of atmospheric water supply (precipitation; P) to demand (potential evapotranspiration; PET) – is projected to decrease (i.e., become drier) as a consequence of anthropogenic climate change, aggravating land degradation and desertification1-6. However, the timing of significant aridification relative to natural variability – defined here as the time of emergence for aridification (ToEA) – is unknown, despite its importance in designing and implementing mitigation policy7-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Land Evaluation of Floodplains Under Conditions of Aridification Based on the Assessment of Ecosystem Services
    DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.69.3.1Lóczy, D. et al. HungarianHungarian Geographical Geographical Bulletin Bulletin 69 (2020) 69 2020 (3) 227–243. (3) 227–243.227 Perspectives of land evaluation of floodplains under conditions of aridification based on the assessment of ecosystem services Dénes LÓCZY1, Gergely TÓTH2, Tamás HERMANN2, Marietta REZSEK3, Gábor NAGY1, József DEZSŐ1, Ali SALEM3,4, Péter GYENIZSE1, Anne GOBIN5 and Andrea VACCA6 Abstract Global climate change has discernible impacts on the quality of the landscapes of Hungary. Only a dynamic and spatially differentiated land evaluation methodology can properly reflect these changes. The provision level, rate of transformation and spatial distribution of ecosystem services (ESs) are fundamental properties of landscapes and have to be integral parts of an up-to-date land evaluation. For agricultural land capability assessment soil fertility is a major supporting ES, directly associated with climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration as regulationg services. Since for Hungary aridification is the most severe consequence of climate change, water-related ESs, such as water retention and storage on and below the surface as well as control of floods, water pollution and soil erosion, are of increasing importance. The productivity of agricultural crops is enhanced by more atmospheric CO2 but restricted by higher drought susceptibility. The value of floodplain landscapes, i.e. their agroecological, nature conservation, tourism (aesthetic) and other potentials, however, will be increasingly controlled by their water supply, which is characterized by hydrometeorological parameters. Case studies are presented for the estimation of the value of two water-related regulating ESs (water retention and groundwater recharge capacities) in the floodplains of the Kapos and Drava rivers, Southwest Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Desertification in Iran
    hydrology Article Drought and Desertification in Iran Iraj Emadodin *, Thorsten Reinsch and Friedhelm Taube Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Group of Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-880-1516 Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Iran has different climatic and geographical zones (mountainous and desert areas), mostly arid and semi-arid, which are suffering from land degradation. Desertification as a land degradation process in Iran is created by natural and anthropogenic driving forces. Meteorological drought is a major natural driving force of desertification and occurs due to the extended periods of low precipitation. Scarcity of water, as well as the excessive use of water resources, mainly for agriculture, creates negative water balances and changes in plant cover, and accelerates desertification. Despite various political measures having been taken in the past, desertification is still a serious environmental problem in many regions in Iran. In this study, drought and aridity indices derived from long-term temperature and precipitation data were used in order to show long-term drought occurrence in different climatic zones in Iran. The results indicated the occurrence of severe and extremely severe meteorological droughts in recent decades in the areas studied. Moreover, the De Martonne Aridity Index (IDM) and precipitation variability index (PVI) showed an ongoing negative trend on the basis of long-term data and the conducted regression analysis. Rapid population growth, soil salinization, and poor water resource management are also considered as the main anthropogenic drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Afforestation for Restoration of Land and Climate Change Mitigation
    Chapter 2 Afforestation for Restoration of Land and Climate Change Mitigation Authors Imre Berki András Bidló Áron Drüszler Attila Eredics Borbála Gálos Csaba Mátyás Norbert Móricz Ervin Rasztovits University of West Hungary Bajcsy-Zs, 4, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary University of West Hungary, Sopron, Hungary Chapter 2.1 Reforestation under climate change in temperate, water limited regions: current views and challenges Csaba Mátyás ABSTRACT reduce groundwater table level due to higher water use with consequences for water management. The forest/grassland transition zone is especially vulnerable to projected drastic temperature and precipitation shifts in the future. In spite of regional climate conditions is restricted. Ecologically conscious forest policy and management requires the consideration of local conditions, of projections of future climatic conditions and also of non-forest alternatives of land use. The chapter investigates some of the relevant aspects of the ecological role of forests at the dryland edges on the example of three countries/regions on three continents. 55 Chapter 2 1 INTRODUCTION In the drought-threatened regions of the Eurasian and North American forest steppe1 2 has been long considered as crucial in rehabilitating of degraded, over-exploited climatic conditions. resources are presently debated. Due to the limited understanding of interactions between physical processes and land cover, the dispute is still unresolved (Ellison et al. 2011), although the opinion prevails that in the forest steppe zone, water consumption not achieve the goals of environmental protection (Jackson et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2006; Andréassian, 2004; Brown et al., 2005; Wang, Y. et al., 2008). Projected changes in global climate pose a further challenge on dryland ecosystems, as relatively small changes in the moisture balance may lead to considerable ecological shifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality
    SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND DEGRADATION NEUTRALITY A Report of the Science-Policy Interface The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not this have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by the UNCCD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the UNCCD. SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND DEGRADATION NEUTRALITY A Report of the Science-Policy Interface How to cite this document: Orr, B.J., A.L. Cowie, V.M. Castillo Sanchez, P. Chasek, N.D. Crossman, A. Erlewein, G. Louwagie, M. Maron, G.I. Metternicht, S. Minelli, A.E. Tengberg, S. Walter, and S. Welton. 2017. Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. A Report of the Science-Policy Interface. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, Germany. Published in 2017 by United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn, Germany © 2017 UNCCD. All rights reserved. UNCCD-SPI Technical Series No.01 ISBN 978-92-95110-60-1
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Impacts on Plant Biodiversity
    IMPACTS OF CLIMATIC CHANGE IN SPAIN 5. IMPACTS ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY Federico Fernández-González, Javier Loidi and Juan Carlos Moreno Contributing authors M. del Arco, A. Fernández Cancio, X. Font, C. Galán, H. García Mozo, R. Gavilán, A. Penas, R. Pérez Badia, S. del Río, S. Rivas-Martínez, S. Sardinero, L. Villar Reviewers F. Alcaraz, E. Bermejo, J. Izco, J. Jiménez García-Herrera, J. Martín Herrero, J. Molero, C. Morillo, J. Muñoz, M. T. Tellería C. Blasi 179 PLANT BIODIVERSITY 180 IMPACTS OF CLIMATIC CHANGE IN SPAIN ABSTRACT The direct impacts of climate change on plant biodiversity will occur through two antagonistic effects: warming, which lengthens the period of activity and increases plant productivity, and the reduction in water availability. The projections of the model Promes indicate the first will prevail in the north of the Iberian Peninsula and in the mountains, while the second will affect mainly to the southern half of Spain. Hence, the “mediterraneisation” of the North of the Peninsula and the “aridification” in the South are the most significant tendencies for the next century. The more severe scenario involves a climatic displacement of almost a whole bioclimatic belt, particularly in the South, whereas in the more moderate scenario the change is equivalent to half of the altitudinal interval of a belt. Such displacements exceed the migration thresholds of most species. The biggest indirect impacts are those deriving from edaphic changes, changes in the fire regime and the rise in sea level. Interactions with other components of global change (land use changes, modification in atmospheric composition) constitute another important potential source of impacts for which evidence is now beginning to accumulate.
    [Show full text]
  • TERC Submission Environmental Protection Services NT
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The contents of this submission seek to define the potential of accounting for and investing in natural capital to produce income, improve environmental outcomes and improve landscape resilience. We address this with reference to natural capital, carbon and water and broadly address the methodologies to repair landscapes, thereby facilitating the potential to receive income from the carbon and natural capital markets. We note general landscape degradation over widespread areas of the NT. Mechanisms causing the degradation vary however eroded, dehydrated, less diverse and less productive landscapes are the all too common result. Nature based solutions are a logical investment. They are typically cost effective and offer benefits potentially worth billions of dollars a year to the NT through increased income, environmental resilience and human health outcomes. We use examples that have synergies with various other submissions and plans but emphasize a thought and decision making process with solutions focused on assessing and using multiple potentials in any given situation rather than advocating a specific plan. Investment can be considerable and some returns slow to be realised, but they then tend to grow exponentially to capacity. What gets financed gets done. We suggest any stimulus funding should be connected to long term environmental outcomes as there is an imperative to make decisions and investments that help shift us to a resilient sustainable approach to future economic growth and development. Defining or agreeing methodologies to account for impact of actions taken and finance mechanisms are the primary blocks to the market. These issues can be overcome, indeed much has already been done and this space dynamic.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforestation and Surface Cooling in Temperate Zones: Mechanisms and Implications
    Received: 1 October 2019 | Accepted: 15 February 2020 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15069 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE Reforestation and surface cooling in temperate zones: Mechanisms and implications Quan Zhang1,2 | Mallory Barnes2 | Michael Benson2 | Elizabeth Burakowski3 | A. Christopher Oishi4 | Andrew Ouimette3 | Rebecca Sanders-DeMott3 | Paul C. Stoy5,6 | Matt Wenzel7 | Lihua Xiong1 | Koong Yi8 | Kimberly A. Novick2 1State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China 2O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA 3Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA 4Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Otto, NC, USA 5Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA 6Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA 7National Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle, Jamestown, ND, USA 8Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA Correspondence Quan Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Water Abstract Resources and Hydropower Engineering Land-use/cover change (LUCC) is an important driver of environmental change, Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Email: [email protected] occurring at the same time as, and often interacting with, global climate change. Reforestation and deforestation have been critical aspects of LUCC
    [Show full text]
  • A Seesaw in Mediterranean Precipitation During the Roman Period Linked to Millennial-Scale Changes in the North Atlantic
    Clim. Past, 8, 637–651, 2012 www.clim-past.net/8/637/2012/ Climate doi:10.5194/cp-8-637-2012 of the Past © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A seesaw in Mediterranean precipitation during the Roman Period linked to millennial-scale changes in the North Atlantic B. J. Dermody1, H. J. de Boer1, M. F. P. Bierkens2, S. L. Weber3, M. J. Wassen1, and S. C. Dekker1 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, The Netherlands 2Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, The Netherlands 3Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands Correspondence to: B. J. Dermody ([email protected]) Received: 17 June 2011 – Published in Clim. Past Discuss.: 14 July 2011 Revised: 20 February 2012 – Accepted: 28 February 2012 – Published: 29 March 2012 Abstract. We present a reconstruction of the change in cli- 1 Introduction matic humidity around the Mediterranean between 3000– 1000 yr BP. Using a range of proxy archives and model sim- How human civilisation will adapt to future climate change ulations we demonstrate that climate during this period was caused by natural and anthropogenic forcings is an issue of typified by a millennial-scale seesaw in climatic humid- extensive research and intense debate (IPCC, 2007). How- ity between Spain and Israel on one side and the Central ever, climate change is nothing new for human civilisation Mediterranean and Turkey on the other, similar to precipita- and much can be learned from understanding how past so- tion anomalies associated with the East Atlantic/West Russia cieties responded to changes in climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Desertification
    SPM3 Desertification Coordinating Lead Authors: Alisher Mirzabaev (Germany/Uzbekistan), Jianguo Wu (China) Lead Authors: Jason Evans (Australia), Felipe García-Oliva (Mexico), Ismail Abdel Galil Hussein (Egypt), Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal (Pakistan), Joyce Kimutai (Kenya), Tony Knowles (South Africa), Francisco Meza (Chile), Dalila Nedjraoui (Algeria), Fasil Tena (Ethiopia), Murat Türkeş (Turkey), Ranses José Vázquez (Cuba), Mark Weltz (The United States of America) Contributing Authors: Mansour Almazroui (Saudi Arabia), Hamda Aloui (Tunisia), Hesham El-Askary (Egypt), Abdul Rasul Awan (Pakistan), Céline Bellard (France), Arden Burrell (Australia), Stefan van der Esch (The Netherlands), Robyn Hetem (South Africa), Kathleen Hermans (Germany), Margot Hurlbert (Canada), Jagdish Krishnaswamy (India), Zaneta Kubik (Poland), German Kust (The Russian Federation), Eike Lüdeling (Germany), Johan Meijer (The Netherlands), Ali Mohammed (Egypt), Katerina Michaelides (Cyprus/United Kingdom), Lindsay Stringer (United Kingdom), Stefan Martin Strohmeier (Austria), Grace Villamor (The Philippines) Review Editors: Mariam Akhtar-Schuster (Germany), Fatima Driouech (Morocco), Mahesh Sankaran (India) Chapter Scientists: Chuck Chuan Ng (Malaysia), Helen Berga Paulos (Ethiopia) This chapter should be cited as: Mirzabaev, A., J. Wu, J. Evans, F. García-Oliva, I.A.G. Hussein, M.H. Iqbal, J. Kimutai, T. Knowles, F. Meza, D. Nedjraoui, F. Tena, M. Türkeş, R.J. Vázquez, M. Weltz, 2019: Desertification. In:Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Record and Causes of Late Triassic Extinctions
    Earth-Science Reviews 65 (2004) 103–139 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Assessing the record and causes of Late Triassic extinctions L.H. Tannera,*, S.G. Lucasb, M.G. Chapmanc a Departments of Geography and Geoscience, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, USA b New Mexico Museum of Natural History, 1801 Mountain Rd. N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87104, USA c Astrogeology Team, U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA Abstract Accelerated biotic turnover during the Late Triassic has led to the perception of an end-Triassic mass extinction event, now regarded as one of the ‘‘big five’’ extinctions. Close examination of the fossil record reveals that many groups thought to be affected severely by this event, such as ammonoids, bivalves and conodonts, instead were in decline throughout the Late Triassic, and that other groups were relatively unaffected or subject to only regional effects. Explanations for the biotic turnover have included both gradualistic and catastrophic mechanisms. Regression during the Rhaetian, with consequent habitat loss, is compatible with the disappearance of some marine faunal groups, but may be regional, not global in scale, and cannot explain apparent synchronous decline in the terrestrial realm. Gradual, widespread aridification of the Pangaean supercontinent could explain a decline in terrestrial diversity during the Late Triassic. Although evidence for an impact precisely at the boundary is lacking, the presence of impact structures with Late Triassic ages suggests the possibility of bolide impact-induced environmental degradation prior to the end-Triassic. Widespread eruptions of flood basalts of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) were synchronous with or slightly postdate the system boundary; emissions of CO2 and SO2 during these eruptions were substantial, but the contradictory evidence for the environmental effects of outgassing of these lavas remains to be resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Agroecology to Build Climate-Resilient Livelihoods and Food Systems
    THE POTENTIAL OF AGROECOLOGY TO BUILD CLIMATE-RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SYSTEMS REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE CARIBBEAN Gaps and opportunities in the agriculture and land use sectors THE POTENTIAL OF AGROECOLOGY TO BUILD CLIMATE-RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SYSTEMS Lead Authors: Fabio Leippert Biovision Maryline Darmaun Martial Bernoux Molefi Mpheshea Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations PUBLISHED BY THE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND BIOVISION FOUNDATION FOR ECOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ROME, 2020 Required citation: Leippert, F., Darmaun, M., Bernoux, M. and Mpheshea, M. 2020. The potential of agroecology to build climate-resilient livelihoods and food systems. Rome. FAO and Biovision. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb0438en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Biovision Foundation for Ecological Development concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or Biovision in preference to others of a simi- lar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or Biovisioin. ISBN 978-92-5-133109-5 © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]