DOCSLIB.ORG

February , R 1 II C- 1" , I 1979

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

I" q ... ~,... ) l 0 1 t; February , r 1 II c- 1" , I 1979 Volume xv, Number 2 Price Sl.50 1. Abraham Lincoln 2. Charles Sumner 3. William H. Seward 4. Alvan Bovay 5. Salmon P. Chase 6. John C. Fremont 7. Frederick Douglass RIPON fORCJM COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Nelson A. Rockefeller 2 Rediscovering Our Roots 3 RIPON ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1978 4 VIEW FROM HAWKINS GORE The Republican Birthday Party 6 1854 REPUBLICAN CALENDAR 7 Nelson A. Rockefeller 12Sth ANNIVERSARY CALE NDAR 8 ADDENDA AND ERRATA 8 ince its founding in December, 1962 the Ripon Society has shared the hopes, the exhilaration and the frustra­ SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY- Early Republican Party Leaders S tion that marked Nelson Rockefeller's political life. 8 Li ke "the Governor", proud of our party's long tradition of THE REPUBLICAN PLATFORM civil righ ts advocacy, we rejoiced in the mid-sixties as the OF 1854 8 nation swept away the remnants of the Jim Crow system, but grieved that our party temporized at this great moment of THE REPUBLICAN PLATfORM moral crisis. Nelson Rockefeller, a man born to privilege, OF 1860 9 was the champion of those who believed that our party THE BIRTH OF THE should represent not only the comfortable majority but also REPUBLICAN PARTY 11 the non-white and the underprivileged. ANATIONALREPUBLICAN 17 Despite the tendency of the media to create a shorthand LEADER IS BORN term "Rockefelle r Republicanism", the measure of Nelson LI NCOLN'S PEORIA SPEECH 20 Rockefeller could not be found in an ideology or political philosophy. Never a stirring orator, "Rocky" as he was THEFUTURE OF THE GOP 23 called by the man in the st reet, was instead a person to be known by his deeds. His zest for life and his genuine love for people shone through even at the end of a long day of campaigning. In the spirit of a family which has done much to shape America, Rocky poured enormous energy into his RIPON FOR~M public service and undertook to accomplish Bunyanesque Editor: Arthur M. 1I i11 11 tasks. The huge and sometimes overambitious scale of Nel­ E .~ec uti ve Editor: Steven D. Li ve ngood son Rockefeller's projects was an occasional source o f dis­ Art Director: Eli ~atJ.cth Lee (The Graphic Tun a) appointment. TH E RIPON FOR UM is pubUshcd monthly by the Ripon Society. Inc. One of the most natural campaigners in the twentieth cen­ In the publica tion, the Society hopes to proYide a forum for fresh ideas, we I! researched prOP'Osa ls, and:l spirit of creative tury, Nelson Rockefeller could never master the presidential criticism and innovation in Ih e Republican Party. Manu· nominating process of his own party. This, undoubtedly scripts and ph otographs arc so li cited , but do not represent the vie ws of the Society unless so stated. the greatest disappointmenl of his public life , could be at­ Contcnts are copyrightcd C 19 78 by the Ripon Society, Inc .• tributed to a combination o f ill·timing, bad luck and a lack 800 18th St reet, N.W. , Wa shington, D.C. 20006. of stomach for the tedious chores of organization building Second class postage and fees paid at Wa shington, D.C. and between elections, a knack developed by Richard Nixon. additional mailing offices. Subscription rates: 515 per year, 57.50 for students, service· Rockefeller's disappointments were not merely personal, men, Peace Corps. Vi sta and other volunteers. Overseas, they profoundly shaped the course of Ame rican politics. add $6. Please allow five weeks for address changes. Had Nelson Rockefe ller somehow secured his party's presi· The Ripon Society, Inc., John C. Topping, Jr., President, is a Republica n rese arch and policy organization whose members dential nomination in 1960, the Republican Party would arc business, academic, and profe ssional men and women. probably, as Robert Kennedy later suggested, have handily It is headquart ered in Washington, D.C .• with fi ft ee n chap· won the Presidency. The Civil Ri ghts revolution of the nine­ ters, several affi liatcd subchapters, and National Associate members throughout the United States. Th e Society is su p­ teen sixties would have been carried out largely under Re­ port ed by chapter dues, individual contributions, and reve­ publican auspices and the GOP might again have enjoyed nues from its publications and contract work. the allegiance of a majority of America's blacks, many union 2 Ripon Forum families and a large portion of the intellectual community. and most innovative capitalist industrial economy ever seen. While one can speculate endlessly about what might have Despite its much longer history, the Democratic Party has been had Nelson Rockefeller achieved his ultimate politi­ few achievements that can come close to the undeniably Re· cal ambition, this son of Dartmouth, Pocantico Hills and publican Emancipation Proclamation, Thirteenth, Four­ Manhattan left an impact on his country more enduring than teenth and Fifteenth Amendments, the Homestead Act, the that of most twentieth century Presidents. As perhaps the land Grant Act or the Sherman Anti·Trust Act. outstanding governor of the second half of the twentieth century, Rockefeller showed that creative state government In contrast to these achievements which have undergirded was an alternative to expansion of the Federal leviathan. He the growth of a free and competitive enterprise system, the re cruited int o public service some of the ablest Ameri cans of Democrats have offered often only a curious amalgam of our time. Henry Ki ssinger is the best known Rockefeller reo slogans and acronyms. In case our yearning for novelty was cruit, but Nelson Rockefeller attracted hundreds of other not slaked by the New Deal or the New Frontier, Jimmy Car· able Americans into public service , from whence many went ter offers us a New Foundation. His Administration has not on to serve Presidents and governors of both parties. Left yet been able to produce a coherent energy policy, but he and right wing conspiracy theorists have delighted in tieing and his feUow Democrats have given us a DOE. We can ex· such appointments to some sinister Rockefeller conspiracy. pect a similar stroke of Democratic ingenuity to solve the Instead Rocke feller's ability to funnel brilliant people into crisis of rampant illiteracy , crime and truancy in our public public life was more a testament to "the Governor's" guts, schools. Before the year is out the Democrats undoubtedly personal drive and commitment to excellence. will have given us a second DOE and the quality of educa· tion will have slipped only a little bit more. During the past year the nation and the Rockefeller family have been saddened by the death of two remarkable bro­ There is a circus·like atmosphere to that coUection of politi· thers. John D. Rockefeller III , as private a personality as his cians who parade under the label of Democrats, "friends of younger brother Nelson was a public personage, provided the common man". Jerry Brown seems to have concluded worldwide leadership in such areas as population planning that what this country yearns fo r is strong followership. and private philanthropy. Both brothers in their own way Carter appears to curry popular favo r by firing his own fulfilled to the best of their ability the sense of duty incul­ appointees. More and more he looks like the craftsman who cated in them by their parents. In so doing they have greatly blames his shoddy work on his tools. enriched ou r world . The Democratic Party is today. just as it was in the eighteen fifties , a disparate collection of interest groups, politicians and ideologues. It is a party incapable of a unifying vis ion and bound together only by a desire to cling to the levers of Rediscovering power. Our Roots In this setting Republicans can redirect the poli tical des· tiny of this nation. particularly if they emulate the example of early party Jeaders. The passion for human freedom that motivated such early RepUblicans as Charles Sumner, Wil­ us t a year ago many political pundits and quite a few liam Seward, Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln can Republicans were questioning whether the Republican be manifested today in a sustained defense of individual J Party would go the way of the Whigs. Yet now , as righ ts against bureaucratic encroachment. Rather than fol· the GOP begins to celebrate the 1251h anniversary of its lowing the sterile "stoke the bureaucracy" urban policy ap­ birth, our party has regained its self confidence. Under the proach of today's Democrats our party can, in the spirit of brilliant leadership of Bill Brock the Republican Party has be­ the Homestead Act , promote neighborhood empowerment. gun to reverse a generation long erosion in its strength at the grass roots. This Re publican resurgence is not merely the The "free labor" concept so dear to ea rly Republican think· product of superbly executed "nuts and bolts" politics. in ­ ing can translate into a sustained party commitment to max· creaSingl y the RepUblican Party is seizing the intellectual imize the opportunity for the entrepreneur, the inventor or high ground and demorali zed Democrats, inheritors or a the risk·taker. A tax policy that encourages innovation and series of shopworn and anachronistic cliches, are in disarray. risk·taking should be pursued vigorously. From its founding in 1854 in the Midwestern Heartland until These radical concepts that gave birth to our party can pro· the dawn of the New Deal , the RepUblican Party dominated vide some guide as we prepare to emancipate our country the political agenda of America.
Recommended publications
  • Lincoln Lore

    Lincoln Lore

    Lincoln Lore Bulletin of the Loui.s A. WatTen Lincoln Library and Museum. Mark 1-:. NeeJy. Jr., Editor. Mory Jane Hubler. Editorial Assistant. Published each month by the June, !980 Lincoln National Life lna:uranoeCompany, 1-"ort Wayne, Indiana 4680l. Number 1708 BLAIR The elder statesman is a familiar ft.xture on the Washington triumph of their conservative-even react.ionary- constitu· political seene U)day. In recent years, the names of Clark tional ideas after Lincoln's death has not endeared the Blairs Clifford and Averell Harriman have often appeared in the to modern historians. Eight years ago, when I asked a college headlines at times of national crisis. Abraham Lincoln's professor what was the point of his lecture on Reconstruction administration was one long crisis, and Francis Preston Blair in an American history survey course, he replied humorously. was the Civil War•s elder statesman. A relic of the Presidency ''To hell with Montgomery Blair." Smith's biography, which of Andrew Jackson, Blair was innuential because of his is particularly strong on the Blair familyjs inner workings. is prox_imity tQ Washington. his blurred partisanship, his many a valuable corrective to this hostility absorbed by so many political connections, and his age and experience. At last he historians in recent years. It is most illuminating to discover has a modern biographer, Elbert B. Smith, who gives consid· how personally likable the old man was. Even tbe unbudging erable stress to the Civil War years in Francis Preston Blair Charles Sumner never took personal exception to attacks on (New York: The Free Press, 1980).
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]

    [Pennsylvania County Histories]

    REFEI IENCE Ji ffi OOLLE( ]TIONS S-A 9"7 Y.<P H VCf Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun66unse as ... > . INDEX, Page B Page ft <H 4 • H 'p5 'i'T* ^ l I y,bV INDEX. 5age S '1 ' 3age Pag* "S i • s . *■ • • W T uv w IL . 1. , j ’■- w* W ■ : XYZ . I r—;-- Mb . ,_ tr_ .... »> '' mi - . ■ nothing? It is rather a new method to white- I “ nuts for future historians TO CRACK.” * wash one’s “great-grandfather” by blacken-P % ing another man’s “grandfather.” Is it to ' Immense and '(Overwhelming in importance j make money ? Alas! Mr. Editor, for the to future historians as Mr. Smith’s work is, j sake’ of decency I regret to say it is. t we confess after cracking his nuts we found! The long delay in the publication, the the kernels to be wretchedly shrivelled-up i frequent announcements in the newspapers affairs. They are, most of them, what Mr. 1 of what teas to appear, as though held Toots would say, “ decidedly of no conse- | I in terror en% over parties known to be j quence.” After investigating his labors we 1 ■ sensitive on the subject, conclusively show <; have arrived at this conclusion, that the:| Cr' this to be the object. But if more be author, notwithstanding his literary anteee-! wanting, Mr.
  • Blair Family Papers

    Blair Family Papers

    Blair Family Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Prepared by Paul Ledvina and Margaret McAleer Revised and expanded by Michael Spangler Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2003 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 1998 Finding aid URL: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998026 Latest revision: 2010 March Collection Summary Title: Blair Family Papers Span Dates: 1755-1968 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1829-1892) ID No.: MSS12930 Creator: Blair family Extent: 19,050 items; 73 containers plus 1 oversize; 29.5 linear feet; 49 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in English Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: Prominent family in nineteenth century national politics. Correspondence, speeches and writings, legal files, financial records, historical research files, printed matter, and estate records documenting principally the careers of Francis Preston Blair, journalist and presidential advisor, Frank P. Blair, soldier and politician, and Montgomery Blair, lawyer and cabinet officer. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Andrew, John A. (John Albion), 1818-1867--Correspondence. Barnard, J. G. (John Gross), 1815-1882--Correspondence. Benton, Thomas Hart, 1782-1858--Correspondence. Bernays, Charles S.--Correspondence. Blair family--Correspondence. Blair family. Blair, Francis Preston, 1791-1876. Francis Preston Blair papers. Blair, Frank P. (Frank Preston), 1821-1875.
  • National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options

    National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options

    National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options Updated December 3, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42812 National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options Summary The National Statuary Hall Collection, located in the U.S. Capitol, comprises 100 statues provided by individual states to honor persons notable for their historic renown or for distinguished services. The collection was authorized in 1864, at the same time that Congress redesignated the hall where the House of Representatives formerly met as National Statuary Hall. The first statue, depicting Nathanael Greene, was provided in 1870 by Rhode Island. The collection has consisted of 100 statues—two statues per state—since 2005, when New Mexico sent a statue of Po’pay. At various times, aesthetic and structural concerns necessitated the relocation of some statues throughout the Capitol. Today, some of the 100 individual statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection are located in the House and Senate wings of the Capitol, the Rotunda, the Crypt, and the Capitol Visitor Center. Legislation to increase the size of the National Statuary Hall Collection was introduced in several Congresses. These measures would permit states to furnish more than two statues or allow the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories to provide statues to the collection. None of these proposals were enacted. Should Congress choose to expand the number of statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection, the Joint Committee on the Library and the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) may need to address statue location to address aesthetic, structural, and safety concerns in National Statuary Hall, the Capitol Visitor Center, and other areas of the Capitol.
  • Free Soil Movement in Illinois

    Free Soil Movement in Illinois

    A HISTORY OF THE FREE SOIL MOVEMENT IN ILLINOIS, TOGETHER WITH A REVIEW OE THE KINDRED POLITICAL A N T I-M E R Y MOVEMENTS CULMINATING IN THE EORMATION OE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, . by . AUREKA BELLE KILER. THE FOR THE DEGREE OF A. B„ COLLEGE OF LFl'ERATURE AND ARTS. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. 1896. PRESS OF THE GAZETTE CHAMPAIGN U, A HISTORY OP THE PREE-SOIL MOVEMENT IN ILLINOIS. TOGETHER WITH A REVIEW OP THE KINDRED POLITICAL ANTI-SLAVERY MOVEMENTS CULMINATING IN THE FORMATION OP THE REPUBLICAN PARTY Table of Contents. Cause of the organization of the Free-Soil party. Names of leaders. Nomination of Taylor by the Whigs. Purposes of the new party. Convention held at Buffalo in 1848. Principles of this party. Martin Van Buren nominated for President. Number of Free-Soil votes cast. Convention of 1852, at Pittsburgh. John P. Hale nominated for President. Votes cast in State and Nation. Decrease in number of votes cast. This the last Free-Soil convention held. Political and Conscientious Free-Soilers. Illinois. No slave State, still there were slaves. Extinct by 1850. Administration of Governor Coles. Elements in the population of the State. Influence of the foreigners. Attitude toward Abolitionists. Judge Cunningham’s experience. Votes cast for Birney, Abolition candidate for President, in 1840 and ’44. Counties in the 4th Congressional District. Abolition votes cast in the 4th district in ’43, *44, '46, •48, for Congressmen. Presidential votes cast in 1848 in this district. Votes were cast for Van Buren and not the principle. Largest anti-Slavery vote ever cast in Illinois.
  • The Presidents House in Philadelphia: the Rediscovery of a Lost Landmark

    The Presidents House in Philadelphia: the Rediscovery of a Lost Landmark

    The Presidents House in Philadelphia: The Rediscovery of a Lost Landmark I R MORE THAN 150 YEARS there has been confusion about the fPresident's House in Philadelphia (fig. 1), the building which served s the executive mansion of the United States from 1790 to 1800, the "White House" of George Washington and John Adams. Congress had named Philadelphia the temporary national capital for a ten-year period while the new Federal City (now Washington, D.C.) was under con- struction, and one of the finest houses in Philadelphia was selected for President Washington's residence and office. Prior to its tenure as the President's House, the building had housed such other famous (or infamous) residents as proprietary governor Richard Penn, British general Sir William Howe, American general Benedict Arnold, French consul John Holker, and financier Robert Morris. Historians have long recognized the importance of the house, and many have attempted to tell its story, but most of them have gotten the facts wrong about how the building looked when Washington and Adams lived there, and even about where it stood. 1 am indebted to John Alviti, Penelope Hartshorne Batcheler, George Brighitbill, Mr. and Mrs. Nathaniel Burt, Jeffrey A- Cohen, William Creech, David Dashiell, Scott DeHaven, Susan Drinan, Kenneth Fmkel, Jeffrey Faherty, Marsha Fritz, Kristen Froehlich, Roy Harker, Sharon Ann Holt, Sue Keeler, Roger G. Kennedy, Bruce Laverty, Edward Lawler, Sr., Jack and Alice-Mary Lawler, Joann Lawler, Andrea Ashby Lerari, Mark Fraze Lloyd, Barbara A. McMillan, Jefferson M. Moak, Howell T. Morgan, Gene Morris, Roger W. Moss, C.
  • CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN's WESTERN MANHOOD in the URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 a Dissertation Submitted to the Kent S

    CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN's WESTERN MANHOOD in the URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 a Dissertation Submitted to the Kent S

    CONSUMING LINCOLN: ABRAHAM LINCOLN’S WESTERN MANHOOD IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1848-1861 A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By David Demaree August 2018 © Copyright All right reserved Except for previously published materials A dissertation written by David Demaree B.A., Geneva College, 2008 M.A., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2012 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by ____________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kevin Adams, Ph.D. ____________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Elaine Frantz, Ph.D. ____________________________, Lesley J. Gordon, Ph.D. ____________________________, Sara Hume, Ph.D. ____________________________ Robert W. Trogdon, Ph.D. Accepted by ____________________________, Chair, Department of History Brian M. Hayashi, Ph.D. ____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences James L. Blank, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1
  • Republican National Convention Firsts

    Republican National Convention Firsts

    Republican National Convention Firsts The first convention § June 1856: the first Republican national convention was held at Musical Fund Hall in Philadelphia. § The key plank on the party platform: opposition to the extension of slavery in new U.S. territories. § The party’s nominee for president: John C. Fremont, Musical Fund Hall a 43-year-old retired Army officer. § Abraham Lincoln was a contender for vice president, but lost out to William L. Dayton, a former senator from New Jersey. § About 600 delegates attended the convention, along with more than 100 newspaper reporters. To compare: 45,000 delegates, alternate delegates and members of the media are expected at the 2008 convention. William L. Dayton John C. Fremont FNC Republican National Convention Firsts Pioneering women § May 1960: New Covenant co-editor Mary Livermore became the first woman to cover a national political convention when she reported on the Republican meeting in Chicago. § June 15, 1876: Sara Andrews Spencer became the first woman to address a national political convention. She spoke in support of women’s suffrage at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. § June 1892: Therese Jenkins and Cora Carleton of Wyoming became the first women to attend a national political convention as delegates. They served as alternates at the Republican convention in Minneapolis. Margaret Chase Smith at the 1964 convention § July 1964: At the Republican convention in San Francisco, Sen. Margaret Chase Smith of Maine became the first woman to seek a major party's nomination for president. She received 27 votes; nominee Barry Goldwater got 883. FNC Republican National Convention Firsts On the airwaves § June 1924: The Republican National Convention in Cleveland became the first convention to be broadcast on radio.
  • Guide to State Statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection

    Guide to State Statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection

    U.S. CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER GUide To STATe STATUes iN The NATioNAl STATUArY HAll CollecTioN CVC 19-107 Edition V Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii addresses a group of high school students gathered in front of the statue of King Kamehameha in the Capitol Visitor Center. TOM FONTANA U.S. CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER GUide To STATe STATUes iN The NATioNAl STATUArY HAll CollecTioN STATE PAGE STATE PAGE Alabama . 3 Montana . .28 Alaska . 4 Nebraska . .29 Arizona . .5 Nevada . 30 Arkansas . 6 New Hampshire . .31 California . .7 New Jersey . 32 Colorado . 8 New Mexico . 33 Connecticut . 9 New York . .34 Delaware . .10 North Carolina . 35 Florida . .11 North Dakota . .36 Georgia . 12 Ohio . 37 Hawaii . .13 Oklahoma . 38 Idaho . 14 Oregon . 39 Illinois . .15 Pennsylvania . 40 Indiana . 16 Rhode Island . 41 Iowa . .17 South Carolina . 42 Kansas . .18 South Dakota . .43 Kentucky . .19 Tennessee . 44 Louisiana . .20 Texas . 45 Maine . .21 Utah . 46 Maryland . .22 Vermont . .47 Massachusetts . .23 Virginia . 48 Michigan . .24 Washington . .49 Minnesota . 25 West Virginia . 50 Mississippi . 26 Wisconsin . 51 Missouri . .27 Wyoming . .52 Statue photography by Architect of the Capitol The Guide to State Statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection is available as a free mobile app via the iTunes app store or Google play. 2 GUIDE TO STATE STATUES IN THE NATIONAL STATUARY HALL COLLECTION U.S. CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER AlabaMa he National Statuary Hall Collection in the United States Capitol is comprised of statues donated by individual states to honor persons notable in their history. The entire collection now consists of 100 statues contributed by 50 states.
  • Washington's Second Blair House

    Washington's Second Blair House

    Washington’s WA 1607 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20009 USA SHING WWW.GHI-DC.ORG Second Blair House [email protected] TO N’S SE 1607 New Hampshire Ave NW CO ND BLAIR HOUSE An Illustrated History 2nd Rev ised Ed ition For editorial comments or inquiries on this anniversary publication, please contact the editor Patricia C. Sutcliffe at [email protected] or at the address below. For further information about the GHI, please visit our website: www.ghi-dc.org. For general inquiries, please send an e-mail to [email protected]. German Historical Institute 1607 New Hampshire Ave NW Washington DC 20009-2562 Phone: (202) 387-3355 Fax: (202) 483-3430 © German Historical Institute 2017 All rights reserved Cover: The Second Blair House, c. 1923. Architectural Catalog of J.H. de Sibour (Washington, 1923). Division of Prints and Photographs, Library of Congress, blended with a modern-day photograph by Tom Koltermann. Design by Bryan Hart. Washington’s Second BLAIR HOUSE 1607 New Hampshire Avenue NW An Illustrated History Malve Slocum Burns 2nd revised edition Atiba Pertilla with the assistance of Patricia C. Sutcliffe and photographs by Tom Koltermann TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE v INTRODUCTION TO WASHINGTON’S SECOND BLAIR HOUSE 1 WOODBURY BLAIR, SCION OF A POLITICAL CLAN 5 WOODBURY BLAIR IN HIS LETTERS 19 WOODBURY AND EMILY BLAIR AT THE SECOND BLAIR HOUSE 45 JULES HENRI DE SIBOUR, THE BLAIRS’ ARCHITECT 63 A TOUR OF THE SECOND BLAIR HOUSE 69 ENDNOTES 85 SELECTED SECONDARY SOURCES/RECOMMENDED READING 97 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FOR THE NEW EDITION 99 IMAGES AND CREDITS 99 PREFACE Shortly after it was founded in 1987, the German Historical Institute of Washington, DC, needed larger quarters for its growing staff and li- brary.
  • Building the Illinois Republican Party (1855-1857) “You Enquire W

    Building the Illinois Republican Party (1855-1857) “You Enquire W

    Chapter Eleven “Unite with Us, and Help Us to Triumph”: Building the Illinois Republican Party (1855-1857) “You enquire where I now stand,” Lincoln wrote to Joshua Speed in the summer of 1855. “This is a disputed point. I think I am a Whig; but others say there are no whigs, and that I am an abolitionist.” That was not the case, he averred, for “I now do no more than oppose the extension of slavery.”1 To unite all who shared his goal became Lincoln’s main objective. As he helped build a new antislavery party to replace the defunct Whig organization, he little imagined that he would soon become its standard bearer.2 In this endeavor, he displayed the statesmanlike qualities that would characterize his presidency: eloquence, shrewdness, industry, patience, selflessness, tact, commitment to principle, willingness to shoulder responsibility, and a preternatural sense of timing.3 Hostility to the South in general, not just to slavery, helped swell the Republican ranks.4 Lincoln, however, did not appeal to sectional prejudice but focused on the evils of the peculiar institution. 1 Lincoln to Joshua Speed, Springfield, 24 August 1855, Roy P. Basler et al., eds., The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln (8 vols. plus index; New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953-55), 2:322-23. 2 In 1855, Lincoln, like other Whigs, bemoaned the death of his party, which had been disintegrating for three years. Michael Holt, The Rise and Fall of the Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 909-50.
  • Lincoln, Slavery and Springfield: How Public Opinion in Central Illinois Influenced Abraham Lincoln's Positions on Slavery

    Lincoln, Slavery and Springfield: How Public Opinion in Central Illinois Influenced Abraham Lincoln's Positions on Slavery

    Lincoln, Slavery and Springfield: How Public Opinion in Central Illinois Influenced Abraham Lincoln's Positions on Slavery The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Mcclelland, Edward. 2019. Lincoln, Slavery and Springfield: How Public Opinion in Central Illinois Influenced Abraham Lincoln's Positions on Slavery. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42004076 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Lincoln, Slavery and Springfield: How Popular Opinion in Central Illinois Influenced Abraham Lincoln’s Views on Slavery Edward McClelland A Thesis in the Field of History for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University March 2019 !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Copyright 2018 [Edward McClelland] "!! ! Abstract Abraham Lincoln won the Republican nomination in 1860 because he was seen as less radical on the slavery than his rivals William Seward and Salmon P. Chase, and less conservative than Edward Bates. This thesis explores how his career as a politician in Central Illinois – a region that contained of mix of settlers from both New England and the South – required him to navigate between the extremes of the slavery question,