DOCSLIB.ORG

Andrew Johnson and the Patronage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Andrew Johnson and the Patronage University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-1968 Andrew Johnson and the Patronage James Lewis Baumgardner Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the American Politics Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Baumgardner, James Lewis, "Andrew Johnson and the Patronage. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1968. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1874 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by James Lewis Baumgardner entitled "Andrew Johnson and the Patronage." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. LeRoy Graf, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: John Muldowney, D. H. Carlisle, Harold S. Fink, Richard C. Marins Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) November 22, 1968 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by James Lewi s Baumgardner entitled "Andrew Johnson and the Patronage . " I recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a maj or in History. We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance : Accepted for the Council: Vice Chancellor for Graduate Studies and Research D!: S SEi:T.r\TIOf,: Blr:n :. :: 6639 �:\EE:� ANDREW JO�SON AND THE PATRONAGE A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Council of The University of·Tennessee In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree .. Doctor of Philosophy by James Lewis Baumgardne� December 1968 ABSTRACT The Constitution bestows upon the president the right to make appointments "by and with the advice and consent of the Senate" to federal posi tiona at home and abroad. Over the passage of time, through free use of this power and the implied power of removal, the several chief executives constructed a vast patronage system, ot which one primary goal was to reward the party tai thf'ul for their services. The purpose of this dissertation is to determine how well Andrew Johnson, the unexpected successor of Abraham Lincoln, used the seemingly powerful patronage weapon. and the reasons why he used it as he did. Prior to his elevation to the presidency, Johnson had been a Jacksonian Democrat with a great faith in the wisdom of the masses of people. As such, he had subscribed to the spoils system with its attend­ ant principles of loyalty to the party and rotation in office. There is little evidence to indicate that he subsequently changed his views, despite the tact that they were of questionable validity in the unbal­ anced postwar political context of 1865-1869. Andrew Johnson was also a decided individualist, a characteristic which showed itself on several occasions during his presidential career . This trait at times overshadowed his political co�victions and, increas­ ingly during the course of his presidency, dictated his actions. Nowhere was this tact more clearly evident than in his use of the patronage . As president, Johnson initially was allowed a tree patronage hand, but as he and the dominant element of the Republican party, the Radicals ; ii 81:Jl62 iii increasingly clashed on the issues of reconstruction, the latter moved to wrest control of the system trom him. Seeking endorsement for his policies, he appealed to the people in the 1866 congressional campaign. Many of his supporters urged that he use the federal patronage to affect the outcome of the elections , and a number of changes were made, but the Radicals emerged victorious. Some observers, both at that time and later, charged that this result occurred because Johnson misused his patronage powers , but he probably realized that he could not have changed the outcome of the elections regardless of how he might have used his powers of removal and appointment. Having failed to win popular support for his position, Johnson then faced the alternative of either turning to the Democratic party and bolstering it with the federal patronage or becoming politically isolated. The leaders of that party .both expected and encouraged him to return to the fold, but the chief executive steadfastly refused to do so. The people had not elected a Democratic president in 1864 and Johnson's integrity and honesty dictated that they were not to receive one against their will. While becoming increasingly politically isolated, Johnson sought to reward those who had remained faithful to him. Close supporters were appointed to office, and despite demands from Democrats that changes be made, he refused to remove loyal cabinet members from their posts. At the same time, however, the president would not tolerate disloyalty. Wh�n his secretary of war proved unfaithful, Johnson, defying Radical legislative �fforts to secure Edwin M. Stanton in his position, removed iv him-from office. This move led to the chief executive's impeachment and trial, a process which the Radicals unsuccessfully attempted to turn into a condemnation of his entire patronage policy. Both primary and secondary sources were used for this study. Heavy dependence was placed upon certain manuscript collections, parti­ cularly those of Andrew Johnson, Senators John Sherman and Lyman Trum­ bull, and Representative Elihu B. Washburne. The Congressional Globe, the United States Senate Executive Journal, and the official account·of the impeachment trial were also of considerable value. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 I. PATRONAGE : THE PRE-PRESIDENTIAL VIEW 13 II . A TIME OF CONSENSUS 36 III . FOR WANT OF A POLICY • 61 IV. LAME DUCK PATRONAGE 96 V. THE INHERITED FAMILY • 114 VI . PRESIDENTIAL PATRONAGE ON TRIAL 136 VII. IN SEARCH OF A POLICY 155 BIBLIOGRAPHY 167 APPENDIX 175 VITA ••• 179 v INTRODUCTION Two clauses of the Constitution relate to the subject of execut ive patronage . The first provides that the president shall nominate , and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate , shall appoint Amb assadors , other public Ministers and Consuls , Judges of the supreme Court , and all other Officers of the United.States , whose Appointments are not herein other­ wise provided for , and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers , as they think proper , in the President alone , in the Courts of Law , or in the Heads of Departments.1 Wh ile the Constitution thus gave the president an extensive role in the process of appointment to federal office , it ·failed to make any provision for removals . Under what circumstances and by whom were removals to be made? This question became the center of a prolonged discussion in·the First Congress when the bill establishing the Depart- ment of Foreign Affairs (later State Department ) came before that body in June , 1789 , with the provision that the secretary was "to be removable by the President ." During the course of the debat e in the House of Representatives several greatly variant ideas were aired, but the central issue for the maj ority of the members was whether the right to remove was an � officio power of the president or an incident of the power to 2 appoint and therefore to be shared by the president and the Senate. !united States Constitution, Art icle II , Section 2, Clau se 2. The only restriction placed on this provision was that incumbent congress­ men could not hold other federal offices . Ibid. , Article I, Section 6 , · Clause 2. -- 2virtually unsupported was the position of William Smith of South Carolina who insisted that the only provision made by the Constitution 1 2 The latter view was presented clearly by Alexander White of Virginia, who maintained that , since the Constitution divided the power of appointment between the president and the Senate , "they ought also to 3 be associated in the dismission from office. " In support of the view, John Page , a fellow Virginian , gave expression to a thought which undoubt- edly also was troubling some of his colleagues. Arguing that leaving the power of removal with the president alone would encourage the growth of an organization of civil servant s loyal to him, Page warned that "con- ferring this power , so far from making the President more responsible , diminishes his responsibility , and inclines to establish him an independent 4 monarch. " The chief spokesman for the president 's right to remove from office was James Madison, who had argued in an earlier House discussion on this subject that to divide the removal power between the president and the Senate would have the effect of diminishing the president 's 5 responsibility for the actions of those officials under him. He now summarized his position : for removal was impeachment , thereby implying that offices were to be held during good behavior or at least for terms fixed by law. Annals of Congress , First Congress , 475. A view receiving some moderate sup­ port was presented by Sherman of Connecticut , who maintained that office was the creation of Congress and therefore within the limits of the Con­ stitution could be regulated in any manner Congress saw fit . Ibid. , 511. 3 Ibid.' 473. 4 Ibid. ' 540-41. 5 !bid. , 387 , 394-95. 3 Vest this power in the Senate jointly with the President , and you abolish at once that great principle of unity and responsibility in the executive department , which was in­ tended for the security of liberty and the public good.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Civil War Civil War Reconstruction
    American Civil War Civil War Reconstruction History >> Civil War Much of the Southern United States was destroyed during the Civil war. Farms and plantations were burned down and their crops destroyed. Also, many people had Confederate money which was now worthless and the local governments were in disarray. The South needed to be rebuilt. The rebuilding of the South after the Civil War is called the Reconstruction. The Reconstruction lasted from 1865 to 1877. The purpose of the Reconstruction was to help the South become a part of the Union again. Federal troops occupied much of the South during the Reconstruction to insure that laws were followed and that another uprising did not occur. A street in Charleston, SC after the war To Punish the South or Not Many people wanted the South to be punished for trying to leave the Union. Other people, however, wanted to forgive the South and let the healing of the nation begin. Lincoln's Plan for Reconstruction Abraham Lincoln wanted to be lenient to the South and make it easy for southern states to rejoin the Union. He said that any southerner who took an oath to the Union would be given a pardon. He also said that if 10% of the voters in a state supported the Union, then a state could be readmitted. Under Lincoln's plan, any state that was readmitted must make slavery illegal as part of their constitution. President Johnson President Lincoln was assassinated at the end of the Civil War, however, and never had the chance to implement his Reconstruction plan.
    [Show full text]
  • LINCOLN's OFFICIAL FAMILY-Bffiuography
    LINCOLN LORE Bulletin of the Lincoln National Life Foundation -- --- Dr. Louis A. WarreniEditor Published each week by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Fort Wayne, ndlana Number 753 FORT WAYNE, INDIANA September 13, 1943 LINCOLN'S OFFICIAL FAMILY-BffiUOGRAPHY Sometimes the appearance of a new Salmon P. Chase, 1861-1864 Seward, F. W., Stward at Wa8hington book will call to the attention of the 1.18 Senat<w and Secretary of State, public a considerable number of titles Schuckers, J. W., Life and Public Serv· ices of Salm<m Portland Clwse, 1846·1881, 650pp., 1891. with which it may be classified. Gideon Seward, F. W., Seward at Washington \Velles, Lincoln's Navy Department, 669pp., 1874. is such a book. Chase, S. P., AgaimJt tl~ Re,Jealof the as Sent~.t<w and Secretary of State, Missottri Prohibition of Suwery, 1861-187!, 561pp., 1891. Just outside the pale which separates 16pJ>., 1854. Bancroft, F., Life of William H. Sew· Lincolniana from a general library is ard, 2 vols., 1900. an indefinite number of books called Luthin, R. H., Salmon P. Chase'tt P(}o­ collateral items. A bibliography of this litical Career Bef&re the Civil ll'ar. Seward, 0. R., William H. Seward's (23) pp., 1943. Travel• Arormd the World, 730pp., large number of Lincoln J'cference 1873. items has never been attempted, except Chase, S. P., Diary and Cor-rcttpon· in Civil War compilations, where many tlence of S. P. Cl1.0.11c, 2 vols., 1903. Seward, W. H., Recent SpeecJwg and of them properly belong, yet, most of Writing• of William H.
    [Show full text]
  • To the William Howard Taft Papers. Volume 1
    THE L I 13 R A R Y 0 F CO 0.: G R 1 ~ ~ ~ • P R I ~ ~ I I) I ~ \J T ~' PAP E R ~ J N 1) E X ~ E R IE S INDEX TO THE William Howard Taft Papers LIBRARY OF CONGRESS • PRESIDENTS' PAPERS INDEX SERIES INDEX TO THE William Ho-ward Taft Papers VOLUME 1 INTRODUCTION AND PRESIDENTIAL PERIOD SUBJECT TITLES MANUSCRIPT DIVISION • REFERENCE DEPARTMENT LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON : 1972 Library of Congress 'Cataloging in Publication Data United States. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. Index to the William Howard Taft papers. (Its Presidents' papers index series) 1. Taft, William Howard, Pres. U.S., 1857-1930.­ Manuscripts-Indexes. I. Title. II. Series. Z6616.T18U6 016.97391'2'0924 70-608096 ISBN 0-8444-0028-9 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $24 per set. Sold in'sets only. Stock Number 3003-0010 Preface THIS INDEX to the William Howard Taft Papers is a direct result of the wish of the Congress and the President, as expressed by Public Law 85-147 approved August 16, 1957, and amended by Public Laws 87-263 approved September 21, 1961, and 88-299 approved April 27, 1964, to arrange, index, and microfilm the papers of the Presidents in the Library of Congress in order "to preserve their contents against destruction by war or other calamity," to make the Presidential Papers more "readily available for study and research," and to inspire informed patriotism. Presidents whose papers are in the Library are: George Washington James K.
    [Show full text]
  • 5, Webisode 7
    Please note: Each segment in this Webisode has its own Teaching Guide Rutherford B. Hayes Reconstruction—the process by which the Confederate states returned to full membership in the Union—jolted along not under the generous and steady leadership of Abraham Lincoln but under the late president’s successor, Andrew Johnson. Johnson, a Southerner, thwarted almost all congressional moves to assure African Americans the rights of full citizenship. The South was in ruins, its economy flattened. Fields were empty, and so were Southern pocketbooks. Many Southerners were angry; they had lost their enslaved work force and political clout, and now they had to accept former slaves as equals. While Johnson looked the other way, Southern legislators created black codes, which restricted the civil rights of African Americans. Other white men, hiding under white hoods, terrified African Americans by using violence and intimidation. African Americans saw the hard-earned reforms of Reconstruction evaporate under black codes, voting restrictions, and the intimidation of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacy groups. Johnson’s successor, Civil War hero Ulysses S. Grant, was an ineffective president whose administration was immobilized by the corruption of those he appointed. Reconstruction policies eventually determined the disputed election of 1876 between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford B. Hayes; when Hayes promised to pull federal troops out of the South, an election commission awarded him all the disputed votes and thus the presidency. Teacher Directions 1. Use the following questions to guide class discussion. • Which amendment gave African American men the right to vote? • What obstacles did African Americans in the South face? • What were Redeemers? • Why was Ulysses S.
    [Show full text]
  • READYFORMONEYMEN Sswsur«=?£
    3 any. The book la on* of the cleverest *oi- umN ever printed mvJ will probably serve as ft text book on national ftnanoe. It In divided Into three sections. The first auc¬ oyr suits tion la entitled "National Finances" and Why ® contalna crtiolos on national money mat- - »( tera by the heada of the bureaus of tho IhoSd their ® 0 ^ Treasury Department, the leading article being on "The Public Credit," by Secretary m Shaw. The second section of th« volume shape. Reliable fa devoted to Washington, city and capital, 3 and contalna a doaen carefully preform! They are btiHt on a sub¬ artlolea on Washington life. The third stantial framework. This section deala wtth Washington financial in¬ stitutions and was very carefully prepare.! framework is made of fine Shoe Hotmses by men who are authorities on the sub¬ hair¬ jects with which they deal. By far the French canvas and stiff best feature of the book, however, is to-bo cloth. It can't wrinkle, Will Be found In Its Illustrations. The bank-note- green cloth cover contains a* embossed neither can it shrink. We picture of the south front of the treasury tailor the shape, your shape, building and the title page Is rrtade ffom CLOSED masoerated money. The city and country into this stiff interlining', and were ransacked for pictures to go Into "the it's there to stay. And not work, and from the collections of half a Tomorrow, dosen bibliophiles photographs were Ob¬ until we get this foundation tained that are of a moat unusual charac¬ do we cover it with ter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Lore
    Lincoln Lore Bulletin of the Loui.s A. WatTen Lincoln Library and Museum. Mark 1-:. NeeJy. Jr., Editor. Mory Jane Hubler. Editorial Assistant. Published each month by the June, !980 Lincoln National Life lna:uranoeCompany, 1-"ort Wayne, Indiana 4680l. Number 1708 BLAIR The elder statesman is a familiar ft.xture on the Washington triumph of their conservative-even react.ionary- constitu· political seene U)day. In recent years, the names of Clark tional ideas after Lincoln's death has not endeared the Blairs Clifford and Averell Harriman have often appeared in the to modern historians. Eight years ago, when I asked a college headlines at times of national crisis. Abraham Lincoln's professor what was the point of his lecture on Reconstruction administration was one long crisis, and Francis Preston Blair in an American history survey course, he replied humorously. was the Civil War•s elder statesman. A relic of the Presidency ''To hell with Montgomery Blair." Smith's biography, which of Andrew Jackson, Blair was innuential because of his is particularly strong on the Blair familyjs inner workings. is prox_imity tQ Washington. his blurred partisanship, his many a valuable corrective to this hostility absorbed by so many political connections, and his age and experience. At last he historians in recent years. It is most illuminating to discover has a modern biographer, Elbert B. Smith, who gives consid· how personally likable the old man was. Even tbe unbudging erable stress to the Civil War years in Francis Preston Blair Charles Sumner never took personal exception to attacks on (New York: The Free Press, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Repudiation! the Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870
    Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva Pierre du Bois Foundation GOVERNMENT DEBT CRISES: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, AND HISTORY December 14-15, 2012 Repudiation! The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Dr. Franklin Noll President Noll Historical Consulting, LLC Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196409 Repudiation! The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Dr. Franklin Noll President Noll Historical Consulting, LLC 220 Lastner Lane Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.franklinnoll.com The author would like to thank Bruce Baker, Jane Flaherty, and Julia Ott for their comments. Abstract: From 1865 to 1870, a crisis atmosphere hovered around the issue of the massive public debt created during the recently concluded Civil War, leading, in part, to the passage of a Constitutional Amendment ensuring the “validity of the public debt.” However, the Civil War debt crisis was not a financial one, but a political one. The Republican and Democratic Parties took concerns over the public debt and magnified them into panics so that they could serve political ends—there was never any real danger that the United States would default on its debt for financial reasons. There were, in fact, three interrelated crises generated during the period: a repudiation crisis (grounded upon fears of the cancellation of the war debt), a repayment crisis (arising from calls to repay the debt in depreciated currency), and a refunding crisis (stemming from a concern of a run on the Treasury). The end of the Civil War debt crisis came only when there was no more political advantage to be gained from exploiting the issue of the public debt.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook for Fall & Lame Duck
    ML Strategies Update ML Strategies, LLC 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 USA FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: @MLStrategies 202 296 3622 www.mlstrategies.com AUGUST 30, 2016 OUTLOOK FOR FALL & LAME DUCK As summer ends and we look ahead to cooler weather, a historic presidential election, and a legislative and regulatory calendar that has numerous measures ready for activity, ML Strategies is pleased to share our outlook on what to expect in the final quarter of 2016. The House and Senate are both set to return September 6 from an exceptionally long August recess that started this year in mid-July to accommodate the party presidential nominating conventions in Cleveland and Philadelphia. The House is scheduled to be in session for four weeks and the Senate for five weeks when they will both break again for the month of October to campaign. Elections are held on Tuesday, November 8 and the outcome – the election of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump to the presidency, and decisions by voters that will impact which party will hold the majorities in the House and Senate – will play a significant role in determining the legislative calendar and agenda for the remainder of the year. The current lame duck calendar has the House in session for 16 days and the Senate in session for 20 days between the election and year-end. We can count on some bills moving during the September work period, such as a short-term Continuing Resolution (CR) to fund the federal government for some period of time, likely into mid- December.
    [Show full text]
  • Blair Family Papers
    Blair Family Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Prepared by Paul Ledvina and Margaret McAleer Revised and expanded by Michael Spangler Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2003 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 1998 Finding aid URL: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998026 Latest revision: 2010 March Collection Summary Title: Blair Family Papers Span Dates: 1755-1968 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1829-1892) ID No.: MSS12930 Creator: Blair family Extent: 19,050 items; 73 containers plus 1 oversize; 29.5 linear feet; 49 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in English Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: Prominent family in nineteenth century national politics. Correspondence, speeches and writings, legal files, financial records, historical research files, printed matter, and estate records documenting principally the careers of Francis Preston Blair, journalist and presidential advisor, Frank P. Blair, soldier and politician, and Montgomery Blair, lawyer and cabinet officer. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Andrew, John A. (John Albion), 1818-1867--Correspondence. Barnard, J. G. (John Gross), 1815-1882--Correspondence. Benton, Thomas Hart, 1782-1858--Correspondence. Bernays, Charles S.--Correspondence. Blair family--Correspondence. Blair family. Blair, Francis Preston, 1791-1876. Francis Preston Blair papers. Blair, Frank P. (Frank Preston), 1821-1875.
    [Show full text]
  • National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options
    National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options Updated December 3, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42812 National Statuary Hall Collection: Background and Legislative Options Summary The National Statuary Hall Collection, located in the U.S. Capitol, comprises 100 statues provided by individual states to honor persons notable for their historic renown or for distinguished services. The collection was authorized in 1864, at the same time that Congress redesignated the hall where the House of Representatives formerly met as National Statuary Hall. The first statue, depicting Nathanael Greene, was provided in 1870 by Rhode Island. The collection has consisted of 100 statues—two statues per state—since 2005, when New Mexico sent a statue of Po’pay. At various times, aesthetic and structural concerns necessitated the relocation of some statues throughout the Capitol. Today, some of the 100 individual statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection are located in the House and Senate wings of the Capitol, the Rotunda, the Crypt, and the Capitol Visitor Center. Legislation to increase the size of the National Statuary Hall Collection was introduced in several Congresses. These measures would permit states to furnish more than two statues or allow the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories to provide statues to the collection. None of these proposals were enacted. Should Congress choose to expand the number of statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection, the Joint Committee on the Library and the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) may need to address statue location to address aesthetic, structural, and safety concerns in National Statuary Hall, the Capitol Visitor Center, and other areas of the Capitol.
    [Show full text]
  • Contingent Election of the President and Vice President by Congress: Perspectives and Contemporary Analysis
    Contingent Election of the President and Vice President by Congress: Perspectives and Contemporary Analysis Updated October 6, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R40504 Contingent Election of the President and Vice President by Congress Summary The 12th Amendment to the Constitution requires that presidential and vice presidential candidates gain “a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed” in order to win election. With a total of 538 electors representing the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 270 electoral votes is the “magic number,” the arithmetic majority necessary to win the presidency. What would happen if no candidate won a majority of electoral votes? In these circumstances, the 12th Amendment also provides that the House of Representatives would elect the President, and the Senate would elect the Vice President, in a procedure known as “contingent election.” Contingent election has been implemented twice in the nation’s history under the 12th Amendment: first, to elect the President in 1825, and second, the Vice President in 1837. In a contingent election, the House would choose among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each state, regardless of population, casts a single vote for President in a contingent election. Representatives of states with two or more Representatives would therefore need to conduct an internal poll within their state delegation to decide which candidate would receive the state’s single vote. A majority of state votes, 26 or more, is required to elect, and the House must vote “immediately” and “by ballot.” Additional precedents exist from 1825, but they would not be binding on the House in a contemporary election.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]