RUTH ADRIANA SALCEDO Finalx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RUTH ADRIANA SALCEDO Finalx FRONTIERS OF IDENTITY: TRANSNATIONAL DISPLACEMENT, CLANDESTINITY AND CONFLICT IN THE ECUADORIAN-COLOMBIAN BORDERLANDS AND INNER CITIES IN ECUADOR by Ruth Adriana Salcedo A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Conflict Analysis and Resolution Committee: Chair of Committee Graduate Program Director Dean, School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution Date: Spring Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Frontiers of Identity: Transnational Displacement, Clandestinity and Conflict in the Ecuadorian-Colombian Borderlands and Inner Cities in Ecuador A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Ruth Adriana Salcedo Master of International Relations Simón Bolívar Andean University, 2005 Bachelor of Anthropology Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, 1998 Director: Mark Goodale, Associate Professor of Conflict Analysis and Professor of Anthropology Spring Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA This work is licensed under a creative commons attribution-noderivs 3.0 unported license . ii DEDICATION To refugees around the world, whose journeys of courage and resistance stand as examples of hope and resilience for the whole of humanity. May this research serve, even in small measure, to pave your way towards achieving justice, reconciliation and peace in your lives and communities. I hope I have done justice to your voices And To my incredible family, who stand by my side in every moment of my life. To my loving husband Mac, for his care, patience, solidarity and love throughout the years and to my lovely daughter Nina Rafaella, who was born almost at the same time that this research began. Without your help my angel, I would probably have finished this dissertation two years ago… yet the path would not have been as enjoyable as it was! iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was an intriguing and sometimes challenging journey. It was made possible only with the support of many people and organizations in the United States, Colombia and Ecuador. Although the reader will mostly recognize my voice throughout these pages, many individuals contributed to this research in different ways. From the academic discussions to the ethical debates and difficult conversations, all of them were helpful in providing feedback, challenging me with their questions, reminding me to stay loyal to my beliefs and methods and inspiring me in the final stretch of this research. My special gratitude goes to Dr. Mark Goodale, my committee chair, whose mentorship and friendship accompanied me throughout my years in SCAR. Your dedication and guidance not only provided important insights for this dissertation, but throughout my entire academic career. Thank you Mark for showing me how a passionate ethnographer engages and interacts in the field with rigor and critical thinking. My sincere gratitude also goes to Dr. Kevin Avruch, whose academic knowledge and advice went far beyond the classrooms at SCAR. Most of my understanding of the Conflict Analysis and Resolution (CAR) field as a vocation, rather than a job or a profession is due to him. Thank you Kevin for your guidance and for generously sharing with me your expertise and knowledge. My sincere thanks also go to Dr. John Dale, who was extremely important in giving shape to this research during its initial phase. His thoughtful suggestions regarding bibliographic sources helped to feed and inform my research from the beginning. Thank you John for your time, commitment and willingness to support my academic journey. I am also extremely grateful to the George Mason University Provost’s Office which supported me throughout my passage through SCAR. This dissertation is a product of their vote of confidence and faith in the university’s multi-cultural student body. Thank you to so many of my colleagues and friends at SCAR as well as to the administrative staff, who were always ready to answer my many, many questions. To Dr. Jo Won Jeong, my academic advisor; Dr. Sandra Cheldelin, Doctorate Program Director and other faculty members whose thoughtful engagement with the field make of SCAR a unique space for academic reflection and social awareness. Special and sincere thanks go to Dr. Christopher Mitchell and Dr. Wallace Warfield (+), with whom I had the privilege of sharing the preparation of several editions of the OAS workshops, and of learning iv from their views, efforts and commitment to advancing the field of Conflict Analysis and Resolution in the Latin American Region. Chris, it has been really an honor and privilege to work with and learn from you. In addition, many colleagues and friends in Quito, Cuenca, Bogota and Pasto were particularly helpful in accompanying my research progress. Especially, Claudia Gomez from the University of Pasto (Colombia), who managed to accommodate many of my requirements during the field work in the borderlands of Colombia and Ecuador. In Quito, several of my colleagues at the Latin American Faculty of Social Science (FLACSO) and at the Simón Bolívar Andean University, challenged me to think once again about the role of academia in social contexts marked by violence and conflict. Many thanks also to the many organizations in Ecuador that work on the matter of refuge that opened their doors for me to inquire about their work: the General Directorate of Refugees, UNHCR-Ecuador, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the Jesuit Refugee Service, as well as organizations of Colombian refugees, especially National Federation of Organizations of Colombian Refugees in Ecuador (FENARE), among others. To my family in Ecuador and in the United States, but especially to my parents Manuel and Ruth who always stood by my side unconditionally in all the projects and decisions in my life. This is also your achievement and a testament to all the hard work and efforts that you devoted to me. To my loving companion in life, my husband Mac, who stood by my side with his solidarity and love and who performed several tasks in the completion of this dissertation: from careful editor of my text to mail courier taking books back and forth between Arlington, Virginia and the Dominican Republic (where this research was completed). To my sweet daughter Nina Rafaella, whose existence is my inspiration to continue searching for non-violent ways to achieve a more just, equal and peaceful world. To my dearest friends, Ana Maria Vicuña, Harbey Peña and Upulee Dasanayake, it was a truly a blessing to count with your support during the different stages of this process. To my dear friends and colleagues Maneshka Eliatamby and Yves-Renée Jennings, who besides continuously encouraging me during this whole research, also set the bar very high with their own academic achievements. Now we share the “academic sisterhood” besides that of being women dedicated to achieving social justice and peace around the world. I cannot finish these acknowledgements without expressing my deepest gratitude to the Colombian refugees who privileged me with their trust and knowledge, allowing me to transit in and out of their life experiences, which sometimes meant wandering through the prickly zones of oblivion and memory. Their accounts reflected in this research are sad reminders that there are no anonymous victims of violence; all of them have their stories, their passions, their struggles and achievements. Theirs are life stories v like yours and mine. It is only if these stories are told and kept in our collective memory, that perhaps they will be valued and transformed into the seeds of a more just world. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... xi Abstract............................................................................................................................xiii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION................................................................................. 1 General Overview of the Area ........................................................................................ 3 Border Dynamics: Sovereign Policies, the Absence of the State, and Vulnerability in Borderlands ..................................................................................................................... 8 Historical Background on Human Mobility.................................................................. 12 Key Terminology .......................................................................................................... 17 General Description of the Research............................................................................. 20 Organization of this Research ....................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER TWO: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK...................................................... 25 Conceiving this Study ................................................................................................... 25 Significance of the Study .............................................................................................. 36 Statement of the Problem .............................................................................................. 38 Exploring the Research Questions
Recommended publications
  • FARC-EP) Marxist-Leninist Insurgency Or Criminal Enterprise?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2005-12 The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army (FARC-EP) Marxist-Leninist insurgency or criminal enterprise? Saskiewicz, Paul E. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1809 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES OF COLOMBIA – PEOPLE’S ARMY (FARC-EP): MARXIST-LENINIST INSURGENCY OR CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE? by Paul E. Saskiewicz December 2005 Thesis Advisor: Jeanne Giraldo Co-Advisor: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2005 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE: The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (FARC- 5. FUNDING NUMBERS EP): Marxist-Leninist Insurgency or Criminal Enterprise? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Colombia's FARC Conflict: Dealing the Right Card
    ENDING COLOMBIA’S FARC CONFLICT: DEALING THE RIGHT CARD Latin America Report N°30 – 26 March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. FARC STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES................................................................... 2 A. ADAPTIVE CAPACITY ...................................................................................................................4 B. AN ORGANISATION UNDER STRESS ..............................................................................................5 1. Strategy and tactics ......................................................................................................................5 2. Combatant strength and firepower...............................................................................................7 3. Politics, recruitment, indoctrination.............................................................................................8 4. Withdrawal and survival ..............................................................................................................9 5. Urban warfare ............................................................................................................................11 6. War economy .............................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Colombia's FARC Conflict
    ENDING COLOMBIA’S FARC CONFLICT: DEALING THE RIGHT CARD Latin America Report N°30 – 26 March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. FARC STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES................................................................... 2 A. ADAPTIVE CAPACITY ...................................................................................................................4 B. AN ORGANISATION UNDER STRESS ..............................................................................................5 1. Strategy and tactics ......................................................................................................................5 2. Combatant strength and firepower...............................................................................................7 3. Politics, recruitment, indoctrination.............................................................................................8 4. Withdrawal and survival ..............................................................................................................9 5. Urban warfare ............................................................................................................................11 6. War economy .............................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidating “Consolidation” Colombia’S “Security and Development” Zones Await a Civilian Handoff, While Washington Backs Away from the Concept
    Consolidating “Consolidation” Colombia’s “security and development” zones await a civilian handoff, while Washington backs away from the concept by Adam Isacson WOLA Senior Associate for Regional Security Policy WOLA WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA December 2012 2 Consolidating “Consolidation” Introduction worried that the model was bringing short-term military occupation instead of long-term governance. This report is the result of an attempt to answer By mid-2012, though, the still-relevant question a question that has bedeviled state-building, of military-to-civilian transitions was being eclipsed stabilization, and development efforts in conflict by a more fundamental concern: “Does this concept zones worldwide: “When can the civilians take over?” have a future?” During the year between posing Focusing on recent experiences in Colombia and our initial question and the publication of this comparing what we learned there with the United paper, the Consolidation model and its closest U.S. States’ experiences in post-surge Iraq and especially analogue, the “Stability Operations” component of Afghanistan, WOLA sought to identify the conditions counterinsurgency (COIN), have lost significant that should be in place for civilians to replace military momentum within the Colombian and U.S. leaderships. personnel as quickly as possible in previously The problem has grown so acute that key personnel are ungoverned and conflictive areas. now leaving. This report will lay out some of these conditions. Frustration with both the Colombian and Afghan They include clear criteria for security, as would be models may be justified, as they have been more expected—but security has, in fact, been the easier part.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambio De Estrategia Política Y Militar De Las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias De Colombia -Farc- Durante El Segundo Periodo Presidencial De Álvaro Uribe Vélez
    CAMBIO DE ESTRATEGIA POLÍTICA Y MILITAR DE LAS FUERZAS ARMADAS REVOLUCIONARIAS DE COLOMBIA -FARC- DURANTE EL SEGUNDO PERIODO PRESIDENCIAL DE ÁLVARO URIBE VÉLEZ PAULA JULIANA TOVAR ORDÓÑEZ UNIVERSIDAD COLEGIO MAYOR DE NUESTRA SEÑORA DEL ROSARIO FACULTAD DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA Y GOBIERNO BOGOTÁ D.C., 2012 “Cambio de estrategia política y militar de las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia –FARC- durante el segundo periodo presidencial de Álvaro Uribe Vélez” Estudio de Caso Presentado como requisito para optar al título de Politóloga En la Facultad de Ciencia Política y Gobierno Universidad Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario Presentado por: Paula Juliana Tovar Ordóñez Dirigido por: Vicente Torrijos Rivera Semestre I, 2012 CONTENIDO Pág. INTRODUCCIÓN 1 1. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LA DINÁMICA DEL CONFLICTO ARMADO EN COLOMBIA 5 2. CAMBIO DE ESTRATEGIA POLÍTICA Y MILIAR DE LAS FARC DURANTE EL SEGUNDO PREIODO PRESIDENCIAL DE ÁLVARO URIBE VÉLEZ 14 2.1. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PLAN RENACER Y DEL PLAN 2010 DE LAS FARC 16 2.2. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PLAN COLOMBIA Y EL PLAN PATRIOTA 21 2.3 DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PLAN NACIONAL DE CONSOLIDACIÓN 23 2.4. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PLAN BURBUJA 28 3. ANÁLISIS DEL CAMBIO DE ESTRATEGIA POLÍTICA Y MILITAR DE LAS FARC Y LOS AVANCES DEL GOBIERNO EN SU LUCHA CONTRA LAS MISMAS, DURANTE EL PERIODO 2006-2010 30 3.1. BLOQUE CARIBE 31 3.2. BLOQUE JOSÉ MARÍA CÓRDOBA 33 3.3. BLOQUE MAGDALENA MEDIO 36 3.4. BLOQUE ORIENTAL 38 3.5. COMANDO CONJUNTO CENTRAL – CCC 42 3.6. COMANDO CONJUNTO DE OCCIDENTE – CCO 44 3.7. BLOQUE SUR 46 4. CONCLUSIONES 54 BIBLIOGRAFÍA ANEXOS LISTA DE MAPAS, GRÁFICAS Y TABLAS Pág.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Narcotic Economies and State Fragmentation: Colombia and Afghanistan
    ILLICIT NARCOTIC ECONOMIES AND STATE FRAGMENTATION: COLOMBIA AND AFGHANISTAN University of Sydney Honours IV 2011 Government and International Relations Word Count: 18 681 SID: 308211979 Huixin Shirley Cheng 1 This work is substantially my own, and where any part of this work is not my own, I have indicated this by acknowledging the source of that part of those parts of the work 2 ABSTRACT This thesis argues that the illicit narcotics economy in Afghanistan and Colombia is the central force fragmenting state power through two main processes of internal regression and external attack. Internal regression refers to the capture, infiltration and corruption of the state by the drug industry that impairs effective state function. External attack refers to the territorial control, coercive force and political legitimacy that the illicit economy provides non-state armed actors. In this way, I contend that the fragmentation of state power by the illicit narcotics economy is two- fold. First, it diminishes state power in absolute terms - hindering the effective state function in terms of key institutions. Second the illicit narcotics reduces state power in relative terms - drug rents providing for the growth in reach and operational capacities of non-state power rivals when the state at the same time is losing its own. 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 ARGUMENT 7 OUTLINE OF THESIS 7 CHAPTER ONE: ILLICIT NARCOTICS ECONOMIES AND ORGANISED CRIME, CONFLICT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 9 ILLICIT NARCOTICS ECONOMY AND ORGANISED CRIME 9 CONFLICT AND RESOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicto Armado En Caquetá Y Putumayo Y Su Impacto Humanitario
    Área de Dinámicas del Conflicto y Negociaciones de Paz UNIDAD DE ANÁLISIS ‘SIGUIENDO EL CONFLICTO’ - BOLETÍN # 73 CONFLICTO ARMADO EN CAQUETÁ Y PUTUMAYO Y SU IMPACTO HUMANITARIO JUNIO DE 2014 Fuente: Base de Datos del Conflicto –Unidad de Análisis Siguiendo el Conflicto 1 RESUMEN EJECUTIVO1 Desde 1965 hasta la actualidad, los departamentos de Caquetá y Putumayo han contado con la presencia de diferentes grupos armados ilegales. Para las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC), estos departamentos –especialmente Caquetá– tienen un carácter histórico y político: fueron la cuna del bloque Sur de esta guerrilla, albergan a comandantes de su Secretariado y fueron sede de las negociaciones entre el gobierno de Andrés Pastrana y las FARC, desarrolladas entre 1998 y 2002. De igual forma, desde 1980, estos departamentos cobraron gran importancia para la expansión y financiación de las FARC, al involucrarse en actividades relacionadas con el narcotráfico. Desde el 2000, los departamentos de Caquetá y Putumayo se han convertido en casos emblemáticos de las transformaciones del conflicto armado colombiano, siendo el bloque Sur de las FARC uno de sus protagonistas. Caquetá –bastión político y militar de las FARC– se convirtió en objeto principal de planes sistemáticos de recuperación territorial por parte de los últimos cuatro gobiernos nacionales; mientras que Putumayo asumió el rol de zona de repliegue de las FARC, especialmente entre 2005 y 2008, y de implementación del plan “Renacer” de la guerrilla en 2009. Este último consistió en mantener el control en zonas de frontera nacional, de baja presencia estatal y relevancia estratégica para el narcotráfico. En ambos departamentos se focalizan actualmente planes de la fuerza pública como “Espada de Honor I” y “Espada de Honor II”, y el Plan de Consolidación Territorial.
    [Show full text]
  • War for Sale! Battlefield Contractors in Latin America &
    University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 4-1-2005 War For Sale! Battlefieldon C tractors in Latin America & the 'Corporatization' of America's War on Drugs Kristen McCallion Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Kristen McCallion, War For Sale! Battlefield Contractors in Latin America & the 'Corporatization' of America's War on Drugs, 36 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 317 (2005) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol36/iss2/8 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Inter- American Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 317 War For Sale! Battlefield Contractors in Latin America & the 'Corporatization' of America's War on Drugs Kristen McCallion* I. INTRODUCTION The Pentagon's efforts to increase efficiency by utilizing troops for purely military missions, combined with the incredible technological development in aircraft and military equipment, have resulted in a largely accepted, yet hardly understood phe- nomenon - the outsourcing of military work to private military companies. Private military companies ("PMCs") are business organizations which provide professional services inexorably linked to warfare.1 PMCs deliver military services, conduct mili- tary and combat training, provide security services, and supply technical expertise and intelligence to the United States govern- ment all over the world. The global business of PMCs is thriving, but to what extent we do not exactly know.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Thomas W
    STATEMENT BY THOMAS W. O’CONNELL ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS AND LOW INTENSITY CONFLICT BEFORE THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 108th CONGRESS STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD JUNE 17, 2004 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COUNTERNARCOTICS IN COLOMBIA Chairman Davis, Representative Waxman, and distinguished members of the Committee, it is my honor to appear before you today to discuss the Department of Defense programs and policy that support for National Drug Control Strategy and to provide a current assessment of this strategy’s effectiveness in Colombia. The Department appreciates that the support Congress provides is critical to our efforts in fighting narcoterrorism in Colombia. DoD’S Role in the National Drug Control Strategy The Office of Counternarcotics is the focal point for DoD’s counterdrug activities, which support the National Drug Control Strategy. The Department’s counternarcotics missions include detection and monitoring, demand reduction, support to domestic and host nation law enforcement and/or military forces. The Department carries out these activities by acting as the lead federal agency to detect and monitor the aerial and maritime transit of illegal drugs toward the United States; collecting, analyzing and disseminating intelligence on drug activity; and providing training for U.S. and foreign drug law enforcement agencies and foreign military forces with drug enforcement responsibilities. In the international arena, the Department of Defense provides much of its counternarcotics support through deployments and programs to train, equip and furnish intelligence and operational support for drug detection, monitoring, and interdiction operations conducted by partner counterdrug forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia: Background and U.S. Relations
    Colombia: Background and U.S. Relations Updated October 26, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43813 SUMMARY R43813 Colombia: Background and U.S. Relations October 26, 2020 Colombia, a key U.S. ally in Latin America, endured from the mid-1960s more than a half of century of internal armed conflict. To address the country’s prominence in illegal June S. Beittel drug production, the United States and Colombia have forged a close relationship over Analyst in Latin American the past two decades. Plan Colombia, a program focused initially on counternarcotics Affairs and later on counterterrorism, laid the foundation for an enduring security partnership. President Juan Manuel Santos (2010-2018) made concluding a peace accord with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)—the country’s largest leftist guerrilla organization at the time—his government’s primary focus. Following four years of peace negotiations, Colombia’s Congress ratified the FARC-government peace accord in November 2016. During a U.N.-monitored demobilization in 2017, approximately 13,200 FARC disarmed, demobilized, and began to reintegrate. The U.S.-Colombia partnership, originally forged on security interests, now encompasses sustainable development, human rights, trade, and wider cooperation. Support from Congress and across U.S. Administrations has been largely bipartisan. Congress appropriated more than $10 billion for Plan Colombia and its follow-on programs between FY2000 and FY2016, about 20% of which was funded through the U.S. Department of Defense. U.S. government assistance to Colombia over the past 20 years has totaled nearly $12 billion, with funds appropriated by Congress mainly for the Departments of State and Defense and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Análısıs Polítıco
    UNIVERSIDAD N A C I O N A L DE COLOMBIA INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES IEPRI DOSSIER contenido a n á l ı s ı s 4 AÑOS DEL GOBIERNO URIBE: BALANCE Y PERSPECTIVAS MAYO - AGOSTO 2006 N˚ 57 La política de seguridad democrática: 2002-2005 FRANCISCO LEAL BUITRAGO 3 Conducta de la guerrilla durante el gobierno p o l í t ı c o Uribe Vélez: de las lógicas de control territorial a las lógicas de control estratégico CAMILO ECHANDÍA CASTILLA COMITÉ EDITORIAL EDUARDO BECHARA GÓMEZ 31 FUNDADOR Francisco Leal Buitrago Proceso inconcluso, verdades a medias: Universidad de los Andes, departamento de Ciencia Política para un balance de las negociaciones DIRECTOR del gobierno Uribe con los paramilitares Luis Alberto Restrepo FERNANDO CUBIDES 55 IEPRI, Universidad Nacional de Colombia EDITORA El gobierno de Uribe y los países vecinos Diana Marcela Rojas IEPRI, Universidad Nacional de Colombia SOCORRO RAMÍREZ 65 ASESORES EDITORIALES Daniel Pécaut Balance de la política internacional Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciencies Sociales Charles Bergquist del gobierno Uribe Universidad de Washington, Seatlle, DIANA MARCELA ROJAS 85 departamento de Historia Stathis N. Kalyvas Universidad de Yale, departamento de Ciencia Política Estrenando sistema de partidos Gonzalo Sánchez Gómez FRANCISCO GUTIÉRREZ SANÍN 106 IEPRI, Universidad Nacional de Colombia William Ramírez Tobón Fundación Seguridad y Democracia, Colombia La “revolución educativa”: transcurso, Fernando Cubides Cipagauta Universidad Nacional de Colombia, resultados y perspectiva departamento de Sociología ADOLFO ATEHORTÚA CRUZ 126 Hugo Fazio Vengoa Universidad de los Andes, departamento de Historia ASISTENTE EDITORIAL Carlos Germán Sandoval IEPRI, Universidad Nacional de Colombia RESEÑAS COMITÉ CIENTÍFICO “Les mouvements indiens en Equateur.
    [Show full text]
  • Injerencia De Estados Unidos Como Un Cambio En La Política Exterior Colombiana Con Respecto Al Conflicto Armado Interno
    INJERENCIA DE ESTADOS UNIDOS COMO UN CAMBIO EN LA POLÍTICA EXTERIOR COLOMBIANA CON RESPECTO AL CONFLICTO ARMADO INTERNO. JUAN SEBASTIÁN NARVAEZ ARCINIEGAS HAROLD IVAN VILLAMARIN ROZO UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y SOCIALES PROGRAMA DE NEGOCIOS Y RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES BOGOTÁ D.C. 2020 INJERENCIA DE ESTADOS UNIDOS COMO UN CAMBIO EN LA POLÍTICA EXTERIOR COLOMBIANA CON RESPECTO AL CONFLICTO ARMADO INTERNO. JUAN SEBASTIÁN NARVAEZ ARCINIEGAS HAROLD IVAN VILLAMARIN ROZO Trabajo de grado bajo la modalidad de Desarrollo de un proyecto investigativo disciplinar para obtener el título de Profesional en Negocios y Relaciones Internacionales Director: EMERSON DAVID DEVIA ACEVEDO UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLE FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y SOCIALES PROGRAMA DE NEGOCIOS Y RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES BOGOTÁ D.C. 2020 AGRADECIMIENTOS Queremos agradecer en primer lugar a nuestras familias, por su apoyo incondicional, amor, tolerancia y dedicación durante nuestro proceso educativo, haciendo mención especial a la madre de Juan Sebastián Narváez Arciniegas, la señora Dorys Elcira Arciniegas, y a los padres de Harold Ivan Villamarin Rozo, al señor Ivan Villamarin y la señora Noelma Esperanza Rozo. Queremos agradecer de igual forma a nuestro director de tesis, el Profesor Emerson David Devia, por su apoyo y guía en este proceso y desarrollo de este trabajo de investigación. Por último, agradecer a nuestros profesores y compañeros de carrera, quienes nos apoyaron en este camino, agradecimiento a todos ellos. 3 RESUMEN El conflicto armado en Colombia, encabezado por diferentes grupos subversivos, pero principalmente por las FARC como fuerzas revolucionarias en oposición a las decisiones y posiciones del Estado, lleva desarrollándose alrededor de cincuenta años.
    [Show full text]